Re: libc6-i386 versus ia32-libs
Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi Goswin, > > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>> >>>But if I run 'ldconfig -v' as suggested the /emul library directories >>>are ignored. See below. The man page for ldconfig doesn't mention >>>/lib/ldconfig either. Is your version in experimental? >> >> >> No, the normal sid version. What version of libc6 do you have? Could >> it be that the libc6 and libc6-i386 have different versions? The >> libc6-i386 shoul depend on a new enough libc6 package for ldconfig to >> work. But I never checked that and don't have access to my sid system >> currently. >> > > Of course there are no pending upgrades. Esp. for libc6\*: > > % dpkg -l libc6\* > Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold > | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed > |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: > uppercase=bad) > ||/ Name VersionDescription > +++-==-==- > ii libc6 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone > un libc6-bin (no description available) > un libc6-dbg (no description available) > ii libc6-dev 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Hea > un libc6-dev-i386 (no description available) > un libc6-doc (no description available) > ii libc6-i386 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: 32bit shared libraries for AM > un libc6-pic (no description available) > un libc6-prof (no description available) > un libc6.1 (no description available) > un libc6.1-dev (no description available) > un libc6.1-pic (no description available) > > As mentioned before, the /lib/ldconfig feature is not documented > at all. Whch version of libc6* has been used for testing? [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l libc6\* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionDescription +++-==-==- ii libc6 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone ii libc6-dev 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Hea ii libc6-dev-i386 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: 32bit development libraries f un libc6-doc (no description available) ii libc6-i386 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: 32bit shared libraries for AM pn libc6-pic (no description available) un libc6-prof (no description available) un libc6.1 (no description available) un libc6.1-dev (no description available) That version works fine here. bc5c67ee8d8c763449b70936ab80a8ab /sbin/ldconfig >>>There is yet another concern: ld.so.conf also contained a search >>>sequence for library directories (AFAIK). How is this supposed to >>>work with the new directory containg symbolic links? >> >> >> Hmm. I don't think there is a concept for the search order of those >> links yet. The directory is ment only for system library dirs so there >> should be no need for ordering them I think. User dirs should still be >> in ld.so.conf >> > > There could be a conflict even for system libraries, e.g. between > a stripped-down small library in /lib used at boot time, and the > full multi-lingual version in /usr/lib, for example. That would never work since /lib is before /usr/lib hardcoded in ldconfig. > Regards > > Harri MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libc6-i386 versus ia32-libs
Hi Goswin, Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> >>But if I run 'ldconfig -v' as suggested the /emul library directories >>are ignored. See below. The man page for ldconfig doesn't mention >>/lib/ldconfig either. Is your version in experimental? > > > No, the normal sid version. What version of libc6 do you have? Could > it be that the libc6 and libc6-i386 have different versions? The > libc6-i386 shoul depend on a new enough libc6 package for ldconfig to > work. But I never checked that and don't have access to my sid system > currently. > Of course there are no pending upgrades. Esp. for libc6\*: % dpkg -l libc6\* Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name VersionDescription +++-==-==- ii libc6 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone un libc6-bin (no description available) un libc6-dbg (no description available) ii libc6-dev 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: Development Libraries and Hea un libc6-dev-i386 (no description available) un libc6-doc (no description available) ii libc6-i386 2.3.6-3GNU C Library: 32bit shared libraries for AM un libc6-pic (no description available) un libc6-prof (no description available) un libc6.1 (no description available) un libc6.1-dev (no description available) un libc6.1-pic (no description available) As mentioned before, the /lib/ldconfig feature is not documented at all. Whch version of libc6* has been used for testing? > >>There is yet another concern: ld.so.conf also contained a search >>sequence for library directories (AFAIK). How is this supposed to >>work with the new directory containg symbolic links? > > > Hmm. I don't think there is a concept for the search order of those > links yet. The directory is ment only for system library dirs so there > should be no need for ordering them I think. User dirs should still be > in ld.so.conf > There could be a conflict even for system libraries, e.g. between a stripped-down small library in /lib used at boot time, and the full multi-lingual version in /usr/lib, for example. Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: libc6-i386 versus ia32-libs
Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>> >>>Is it possible that the new ia32-libs doesn't setup ld.so.conf? >>>After changing it to >>> >>> /usr/X11R6/lib >>> /emul/ia32-linux/lib >>> /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib >>> /emul/ia32-linux/usr/X11R6/lib >>> >>>and running ldconfig I could run several 32bit applications (e.g. >>>vmware). >>> >> >> The new ia32-libs package sets up /lib/ldconfig/* links for those dirs >> and the new ldconfig from libc6 uses them. The three emul lines should >> not be needed. >> >> Please check /lib/ldconfig/ and the ldconfig -v ouput without those >> entries to verify it finds those libraries. Maybe something got >> screwed up. >> > > This seems to be not working as expected. For testing I have kicked out > /emul/* from ld.so.conf again. /lib/ldconfig is: > > # ll /lib/ldconfig > total 0 > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Mar 13 22:11 emul_ia32-linux_lib -> > /emul/ia32-linux/lib > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 Mar 13 22:11 emul_ia32-linux_usr_X11R6_lib -> > /emul/ia32-linux/usr/X11R6/lib > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Mar 13 22:11 emul_ia32-linux_usr_lib -> > /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Mar 5 08:14 x86_64-linux-gnu-lib -> > ../x86_64-linux-gnu > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 Mar 5 08:14 x86_64-linux-gnu-usr-lib -> > /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu > > But if I run 'ldconfig -v' as suggested the /emul library directories > are ignored. See below. The man page for ldconfig doesn't mention > /lib/ldconfig either. Is your version in experimental? No, the normal sid version. What version of libc6 do you have? Could it be that the libc6 and libc6-i386 have different versions? The libc6-i386 shoul depend on a new enough libc6 package for ldconfig to work. But I never checked that and don't have access to my sid system currently. > There is yet another concern: ld.so.conf also contained a search > sequence for library directories (AFAIK). How is this supposed to > work with the new directory containg symbolic links? Hmm. I don't think there is a concept for the search order of those links yet. The directory is ment only for system library dirs so there should be no need for ordering them I think. User dirs should still be in ld.so.conf If you can think of a reason requiring a specific order the links could be prefixed with a number and sorted that way I guess. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libc6-i386 versus ia32-libs
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >>Is it possible that the new ia32-libs doesn't setup ld.so.conf? >>After changing it to >> >> /usr/X11R6/lib >> /emul/ia32-linux/lib >> /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib >> /emul/ia32-linux/usr/X11R6/lib >> >>and running ldconfig I could run several 32bit applications (e.g. >>vmware). >> > > The new ia32-libs package sets up /lib/ldconfig/* links for those dirs > and the new ldconfig from libc6 uses them. The three emul lines should > not be needed. > > Please check /lib/ldconfig/ and the ldconfig -v ouput without those > entries to verify it finds those libraries. Maybe something got > screwed up. > This seems to be not working as expected. For testing I have kicked out /emul/* from ld.so.conf again. /lib/ldconfig is: # ll /lib/ldconfig total 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 20 Mar 13 22:11 emul_ia32-linux_lib -> /emul/ia32-linux/lib lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 Mar 13 22:11 emul_ia32-linux_usr_X11R6_lib -> /emul/ia32-linux/usr/X11R6/lib lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 24 Mar 13 22:11 emul_ia32-linux_usr_lib -> /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 19 Mar 5 08:14 x86_64-linux-gnu-lib -> ../x86_64-linux-gnu lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 25 Mar 5 08:14 x86_64-linux-gnu-usr-lib -> /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu But if I run 'ldconfig -v' as suggested the /emul library directories are ignored. See below. The man page for ldconfig doesn't mention /lib/ldconfig either. Is your version in experimental? There is yet another concern: ld.so.conf also contained a search sequence for library directories (AFAIK). How is this supposed to work with the new directory containg symbolic links? Regards Harri == # dpkg -l libc6 ia32-libs Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed |/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Description +++-=-=-== ii ia32-libs 1.6 ia32 shared libraries for use on amd64 and ia64 systems ii libc6 2.3.6-3 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone data # ldconfig -v ldconfig: Path `/lib64' given more than once ldconfig: Path `/usr/lib64' given more than once /usr/X11R6/lib: ldconfig: Cannot stat /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so: No such file or directory libSM.so.6 -> libSM.so.6.0 libxkbui.so.1 -> libxkbui.so.1.0 libI810XvMC.so.1 -> libI810XvMC.so.1.0 libXRes.so.1 -> libXRes.so.1.0 libXdmcp.so.6 -> libXdmcp.so.6.0 libXinerama.so.1 -> libXinerama.so.1.0 libX11.so.6 -> libX11.so.6.2 libXi.so.6 -> libXi.so.6.0 libdmx.so.1 -> libdmx.so.1.0 libGLU.so.1 -> libGLU.so.1.3 libxkbfile.so.1 -> libxkbfile.so.1.0 libviaXvMCPro.so.1 -> libviaXvMCPro.so.1.0 libXaw.so.8 -> libXaw.so.8.0 libXaw.so.7 -> libXaw.so.7.0 libXpm.so.4 -> libXpm.so.4.11 libXvMCNVIDIA_dynamic.so.1 -> libXvMCNVIDIA.so.1.0.8178 libXaw3d.so.6 -> libXaw3d.so.6.1 libXTrap.so.6 -> libXTrap.so.6.4 libXvMCW.so.1 -> libXvMCW.so.1.0 libXvMC.so.1 -> libXvMC.so.1.0 libXau.so.6 -> libXau.so.6.0 libXext.so.6 -> libXext.so.6.4 libICE.so.6 -> libICE.so.6.4 libXxf86vm.so.1 -> libXxf86vm.so.1.0 libviaXvMC.so.1 -> libviaXvMC.so.1.0 libXtst.so.6 -> libXtst.so.6.1 libXfixes.so.3 -> libXfixes.so.3.0 libXv.so.1 -> libXv.so.1.0 libXt.so.6 -> libXt.so.6.0 libXxf86dga.so.1 -> libXxf86dga.so.1.0 libXp.so.6 -> libXp.so.6.2 libXmuu.so.1 -> libXmuu.so.1.0 libXss.so.1 -> libXss.so.1.0 libFS.so.6 -> libFS.so.6.0 libXrandr.so.2 -> libXrandr.so.2.0 libXxf86misc.so.1 -> libXxf86misc.so.1.1 libXmu.so.6 -> libXmu.so.6.2 /lib: libpam.so.0 -> libpam.so.0.79 libproc-3.2.6.so -> libproc-3.2.6.so libdl.so.2 -> libdl-2.3.6.so libncursesw.so.5 -> libncursesw.so.5.5 libBrokenLocale.so.1 -> libBrokenLocale-2.3.6.so libc.so.6 -> libc-2.3.6.so libnss_dns.so.2 -> libnss_dns-2.3.6.so libcrypt.so.1 -> libcrypt-2.3.6.so libanl.so.1 -> libanl-2.3.6.so libsepol.so.1 -> libsepol.so.1 libselinux.so.1 -> libselinux.so.1 libmemusage.so -> libmemusage.so libnss_hesiod.so.2 -> libnss_hesiod-2.3.6.so libpopt.so.0 -> libpopt.so.0.0.0 libpam_misc.so.0 -> libpam_misc.so.0.79 libnss_compat.so.2 -> libnss_compat-2.3.6.so libSegFault.so -> libSegFault.so libe2p.so.2 -> libe2p.so.2.3 libusb-0.1.so.4 -> libusb-0.1.so.4.4.3 libsysfs.so.2 -> libsysfs.so.2.0.
Re: libc6-i386 versus ia32-libs
Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi G. > > Goswin von Brederlow wrote: >> >> Yes. You can remove ia32-libs or have to wait for an update (ETA >> friday night, via NMU if the maintainer doesn't move). >> > > Is it possible that the new ia32-libs doesn't setup ld.so.conf? > After changing it to > > /usr/X11R6/lib > /emul/ia32-linux/lib > /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib > /emul/ia32-linux/usr/X11R6/lib > > and running ldconfig I could run several 32bit applications (e.g. > vmware). > > > Regards > > Harri The new ia32-libs package sets up /lib/ldconfig/* links for those dirs and the new ldconfig from libc6 uses them. The three emul lines should not be needed. Please check /lib/ldconfig/ and the ldconfig -v ouput without those entries to verify it finds those libraries. Maybe something got screwed up. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libc6-i386 versus ia32-libs
Hi G. Goswin von Brederlow wrote: > > Yes. You can remove ia32-libs or have to wait for an update (ETA > friday night, via NMU if the maintainer doesn't move). > Is it possible that the new ia32-libs doesn't setup ld.so.conf? After changing it to /usr/X11R6/lib /emul/ia32-linux/lib /emul/ia32-linux/usr/lib /emul/ia32-linux/usr/X11R6/lib and running ldconfig I could run several 32bit applications (e.g. vmware). Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: libc6-i386 versus ia32-libs
Michelasso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hello everybody, > today updating my sid I noticed this conflict, and I was wondering if > I can remove ia32-libs from my system or if I have to wait until a new > version of ia32-libs compatible with libc6-i386 comes out (and maybe > this should be the right way to do since, if I am not wrong, ia32-libs > contains many more libraries than llibc6). Yes. You can remove ia32-libs or have to wait for an update (ETA friday night, via NMU if the maintainer doesn't move). And yes, ia32-libs has a lot more libs and won't have libc6 anymore (but depend on libc6-i386) in the future. > Suggestions? Frederick and I are polishing of the package atm for either a maintainer sponsored upload or NMU. If you can't wait and can't do without ia32-libs for a while then fetch the patch from the BTS (one of those 5 merged RC bugs) and build your own ia32-libs. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
