Re: openoffice2 on amd64
Mathieu Lutfy wrote: > Then again, I'm trying to build the source which now fails because > of an "out of memory" problem, similar to what has already been > reported in July by Rene Engelhard to debian-gcc@ list.[3] > > [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2005/07/msg00186.html Yeah, me too(TM). It's a little disconcerting seeing cc1plus using over a GB of memory and everything else on my machine swapped out. I also tried using gcc/g++ 3.2 and had the same problem. This message says it works with gcc 4.1, so I'm going to try that: http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2005/07/msg00188.html -Corey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: openoffice2 on amd64
Le 2005-09-15, à 20:55:10 +0200, v0n0 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrit: > Frederik Schueler ha scritto: > >so far all builds failed: > > > >http://amd64.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=&pkg=openoffice.org2 > >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=315643 > > And then? Well, I had two concerns.. either getting OOo2-ia32 running on amd64, or getting OOo2 to compile cleanly on amd64. I got fed up of stracing oowriter and reading bugzilla archives to find out why OOo2-ia32 fails, so I'm now trying to build it. The build logs from Frederik look rather encouraging: the first builds failed because of dependancy problems which are now fixed. The latest build fails because of a syntax error which was fixed in CVS[1][2] (afaik, I'm not familiar at all with OOo). [1] http://cvs.gnome.org/viewcvs/ooo-build/scratch/sc-vba/vbarange.cxx [2] http://lists.ximian.com/pipermail/openoffice/2005-August/001118.html Then again, I'm trying to build the source which now fails because of an "out of memory" problem, similar to what has already been reported in July by Rene Engelhard to debian-gcc@ list.[3] [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2005/07/msg00186.html But at this point, I guess we should continue this discussion on the debian-openoffice@ list because the maintainers have probably already ran into those problems, most are not amd64-specific. mathieu -- Mathieu Lutfy<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.bidon.ca GPG 0x5F5BCEB4 0D3B 1AEE EF9B FB34 2FE7 80EC 8E8D F00A 5F5B CEB4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: openoffice2 on amd64
Frederik Schueler ha scritto: >so far all builds failed: > >http://amd64.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=&pkg=openoffice.org2 > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=315643 And then? -- Alessandro Dal Grande Student In The University Of Padua - Computer Science Linux Registered User #359258 System: GNU/Linux Debian Sid Pure64 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chat: Psi ICQ) 150487234 Jabber) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Put the fan back into computing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: openoffice2 on amd64
Hello, On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 02:53:18PM +0200, Jerome Warnier wrote: > You should work together with the Debian packaging team for OOo to get > it built automatically on AMD64, if you can. > It could be very interesting to know where it fails, and what you did to > get it build. so far all builds failed: http://amd64.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=&pkg=openoffice.org2 the last run is here: http://amd64.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?&pkg=openoffice.org2&ver=1.9.125-1&arch=amd64&stamp=1125403101&file=log&as=raw Best regards Frederik Schueler -- ENOSIG signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: openoffice2 on amd64
Le jeudi 15 septembre 2005 à 10:07 +0300, Alexander Rapp a écrit : > Angel Claudio Alvarez wrote: > > >El mié, 14-09-2005 a las 20:01 -0400, Mathieu Lutfy escribió: > > > > > >>Le 2005-09-14, à 20:53:39 -0300, Angel Claudio Alvarez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > >>écrit: > >> > >> > Finally, when I tried running "oowriter2", it prints the error: > javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment! > > > >>> ^^ ^^ ^^ > >>>Have you JRE installed?? > >>> > >>> > >>I have kaffe installed, but I thought that the package > >>dependancies would include it if necessary. > >> > >>Isn't OOo built using gcj? > >> > >> > >I don't know how is OOo built > >but if you try to compile OOo from sources ( not alla debian) you need a > >jre ( and must have a JAVA_HOME declared) > > > > > I was able to compile a pure 64-bit OOo2 from the deb-src packages with > just kaffe and gcj (nothing from Sun installed). I think a lot of the > JRE-requiring items are optional and get disabled if you compile on a > machine with no JRE installed. > > In response to the original question: I'm not sure what's wrong with > your 32bit installation. However, OOo2 works fine here natively with no > ia32-libs installed, you can just compile from the source in > experimental using "apt-get source -b openoffice.org2" (assuming you > have experimental deb-src lines in your sources.list). Be warned, the > compile takes about 8 hours on a fast machine and once or twice the > process stops and you have to fiddle source files and restart the > process with dpkg-buildpackage -uc -nc, but it does actually work and > I've had no problems with the resulting 64-bit oowriter2. I have the > resulting 64bit debs here if anybody has somewhere I could upload them. You should work together with the Debian packaging team for OOo to get it built automatically on AMD64, if you can. It could be very interesting to know where it fails, and what you did to get it build. I would have proposed to help myself, but I'm leaving for 2 weeks of vacations starting from Sunday and I still have lots to do before leaving. Regards -- Jérôme Warnier FLOSS Consultant http://beeznest.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: openoffice2 on amd64
Alexander Rapp ha scritto: >Be warned, the >compile takes about 8 hours on a fast machine > and A LOT of space! About 2.5GB. -- Alessandro Dal Grande Student In The University Of Padua - Computer Science Linux Registered User #359258 System: GNU/Linux Debian Sid Pure64 on [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chat: Psi ICQ) 150487234 Jabber) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Put the fan back into computing signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: openoffice2 on amd64
Angel Claudio Alvarez wrote: >El mié, 14-09-2005 a las 20:01 -0400, Mathieu Lutfy escribió: > > >>Le 2005-09-14, à 20:53:39 -0300, Angel Claudio Alvarez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) >>écrit: >> >> Finally, when I tried running "oowriter2", it prints the error: javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment! >>> ^^ ^^ ^^ >>>Have you JRE installed?? >>> >>> >>I have kaffe installed, but I thought that the package >>dependancies would include it if necessary. >> >>Isn't OOo built using gcj? >> >> >I don't know how is OOo built >but if you try to compile OOo from sources ( not alla debian) you need a >jre ( and must have a JAVA_HOME declared) > > I was able to compile a pure 64-bit OOo2 from the deb-src packages with just kaffe and gcj (nothing from Sun installed). I think a lot of the JRE-requiring items are optional and get disabled if you compile on a machine with no JRE installed. In response to the original question: I'm not sure what's wrong with your 32bit installation. However, OOo2 works fine here natively with no ia32-libs installed, you can just compile from the source in experimental using "apt-get source -b openoffice.org2" (assuming you have experimental deb-src lines in your sources.list). Be warned, the compile takes about 8 hours on a fast machine and once or twice the process stops and you have to fiddle source files and restart the process with dpkg-buildpackage -uc -nc, but it does actually work and I've had no problems with the resulting 64-bit oowriter2. I have the resulting 64bit debs here if anybody has somewhere I could upload them. -- Alexander Rapp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: openoffice2 on amd64
El mié, 14-09-2005 a las 20:01 -0400, Mathieu Lutfy escribió: > Le 2005-09-14, à 20:53:39 -0300, Angel Claudio Alvarez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > écrit: > > > Finally, when I tried running "oowriter2", it prints the error: > > > javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment! > > ^^ ^^ ^^ > > Have you JRE installed?? > > I have kaffe installed, but I thought that the package > dependancies would include it if necessary. > > Isn't OOo built using gcj? I don't know how is OOo built but if you try to compile OOo from sources ( not alla debian) you need a jre ( and must have a JAVA_HOME declared) > > mathieu > > -- > Mathieu Lutfy<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.bidon.ca > GPG 0x5F5BCEB4 0D3B 1AEE EF9B FB34 2FE7 80EC 8E8D F00A 5F5B CEB4 > > -- Angel Claudio Alvarez Usuario Linux Registrado 143466 GPG Public Key en http://pgp.mit.edu key fingerprint = 3AED D95B 7E2D E954 61C8 F505 1884 473C FC8C 8AC4 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: openoffice2 on amd64
Le 2005-09-14, à 20:53:39 -0300, Angel Claudio Alvarez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) écrit: > > Finally, when I tried running "oowriter2", it prints the error: > > javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment! > ^^ ^^ ^^ > Have you JRE installed?? I have kaffe installed, but I thought that the package dependancies would include it if necessary. Isn't OOo built using gcj? mathieu -- Mathieu Lutfy<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.bidon.ca GPG 0x5F5BCEB4 0D3B 1AEE EF9B FB34 2FE7 80EC 8E8D F00A 5F5B CEB4 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: openoffice2 on amd64
El mié, 14-09-2005 a las 19:12 -0400, Mathieu Lutfy escribió: > Hi, > > After reading the amd64 howto[1] and the wiki DebianAMD64Faq[2], > I tried to install Open Office 1.9 beta using the i386 packages, > but ran into a few problems. To be short, the error message was > javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment! > no suitable windowing system found, exiting. > > [1] https://alioth.debian.org/docman/view.php/30192/21/debian-amd64-howto.html > [2] http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianAMD64Faq > > Here's how I proceeded: > - installed ia32-libs (apt-get install ia32-libs) > - then installed most of the i386 packages for OOo2 using > dpkg -i --force-architecture *.deb > where *.deb = >openoffice.org2-common_1.9.125+2.0beta2-1_all.deb >openoffice.org2-writer_1.9.125+2.0beta2-1_i386.deb >openoffice.org2-core_1.9.125+2.0beta2-1_i386.deb >python-uno_1.9.125+2.0beta2-1_i386.deb >openoffice.org2-l10n-en-us_1.9.125+2.0beta2-1_all.deb > - installed more ia32 libs until executing oowriter2 did not > complain about linking errors, such as libstdc++6, libpam0g, > etc. I used the method recommended in the ia32 README.Debian > (# dpkg -X libfoobar_i386.deb /emul/ia32-linux) > > Finally, when I tried running "oowriter2", it prints the error: > javaldx: Could not find a Java Runtime Environment! ^^ ^^ ^^ Have you JRE installed?? > no suitable windowing system found, exiting. > > I read on some forums that this was caused by a missing > libstartup-notification, so I installed it in the /emul/ia32-linux > environment, but without any success. > > I'm guessing that since OOo2 uses the ia32-libs, I will probably > need to install many more ia32 libs, but before doing this, I would > like to know if there are any simpler ways of installing OOo2, > other documentation, etc. > > And since I'm curious: what is blocking the build of OOo2 on amd64? > There was discussion in this thread[3] but no news since. I guess > I will try to build it tomorrow, but I would prefer not loose too > much time repeating what others have probably already done. :-) > > [3] http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/09/msg00019.html > > Mathieu > > p.s. In general, installing Debian on a AMD Sempron 3100+ using > the unofficial sarge netboot CD-ROMs succeded without a glitch. > > -- > Mathieu Lutfy<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.bidon.ca > GPG 0x5F5BCEB4 0D3B 1AEE EF9B FB34 2FE7 80EC 8E8D F00A 5F5B CEB4 > > -- Angel Claudio Alvarez Usuario Linux Registrado 143466 GPG Public Key en http://pgp.mit.edu key fingerprint = 3AED D95B 7E2D E954 61C8 F505 1884 473C FC8C 8AC4 signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
