Re: pbuilder maybe? Perhaps?

2004-11-01 Thread Bob Proulx
Harald Dunkel wrote:
 pbuilder seems to be missing. There were no updates in the
 amd64(gcc-3.4) pool for some days, anyway.

Of course if the gcc-3.4 archive has a problem it needs to be fixed.
But your note suggests that you are just looking for a good pbuilder
package.  So I will comment on that, since I can't help with the
other.

Since pbuilder is an all package it is not dependent upon gcc-3.4.
I just updated from the pure64 archive this morning and it did install
a new pbuilder.  If you were looking for a pbuilder update then you
may pull just the architecture pbuilder_0.118_all.deb from any of the
sid archives.

Bob


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: pbuilder maybe? Perhaps?

2004-11-01 Thread Harald Dunkel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bob Proulx wrote:
| Harald Dunkel wrote:
|
|pbuilder seems to be missing. There were no updates in the
|amd64(gcc-3.4) pool for some days, anyway.
|
|
| Of course if the gcc-3.4 archive has a problem it needs to be fixed.
| But your note suggests that you are just looking for a good pbuilder
| package.  So I will comment on that, since I can't help with the
| other.
|
| Since pbuilder is an all package it is not dependent upon gcc-3.4.
| I just updated from the pure64 archive this morning and it did install
| a new pbuilder.  If you were looking for a pbuilder update then you
| may pull just the architecture pbuilder_0.118_all.deb from any of the
| sid archives.
|
| Bob
Pbuilder is in the archive. I could manually download and
install it. But at runtime (using the same server
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4) pbuilder
complained about the Packages file and about Bash:
Distribution is sarge.
Building the build environment
~ - running debootstrap
I: Retrieving debootstrap.invalid_dists_sarge_Release
I: Validating debootstrap.invalid_dists_sarge_Release
I: Retrieving debootstrap.invalid_dists_sarge_main_binary-amd64_Packages
I: Validating debootstrap.invalid_dists_sarge_main_binary-amd64_Packages
W: 
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/dists/sarge/main/binary-amd64/Packages.gz
 was corrupt
I: Retrieving debootstrap.invalid_dists_sarge_main_binary-amd64_Packages
I: Validating debootstrap.invalid_dists_sarge_main_binary-amd64_Packages
W: 
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/dists/sarge/main/binary-amd64/Packages
 was corrupt
I: Checking apt...
:
:
I: Retrieving bash
E: Couldn't download bash
pbuilder: debootstrap failed
~ - Aborting with an error
~ - cleaning the build env
~- removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build//5703 and its 
subdirectories
Would anybody mind to check?
Many thanx
Harri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBhlxcUTlbRTxpHjcRAkXgAJ9bAkWOCLPjYIDI8XgIQnS5ubjicQCcCju3
kZjh2kVmR+/Jm6X4borpDUc=
=14pT
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: pbuilder maybe? Perhaps?

2004-11-01 Thread Andreas Jochens
On 04-Nov-01 16:55, Harald Dunkel wrote:
 Pbuilder is in the archive. I could manually download and
 install it. But at runtime (using the same server
 http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4) pbuilder
 complained about the Packages file and about Bash:
 
 Distribution is sarge.
 Building the build environment
 ~ - running debootstrap
 I: Retrieving debootstrap.invalid_dists_sarge_Release
 I: Validating debootstrap.invalid_dists_sarge_Release
 I: Retrieving debootstrap.invalid_dists_sarge_main_binary-amd64_Packages
 I: Validating debootstrap.invalid_dists_sarge_main_binary-amd64_Packages
 W: 
 http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/dists/sarge/main/binary-amd64/Packages.gz
  was corrupt
 I: Retrieving debootstrap.invalid_dists_sarge_main_binary-amd64_Packages
 I: Validating debootstrap.invalid_dists_sarge_main_binary-amd64_Packages
 W: 
 http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/dists/sarge/main/binary-amd64/Packages
  was corrupt
 I: Checking apt...
 :
 :
 I: Retrieving bash
 E: Couldn't download bash
 pbuilder: debootstrap failed
 ~ - Aborting with an error
 ~ - cleaning the build env
 ~- removing directory /var/cache/pbuilder/build//5703 and its 
 subdirectories
 
 
 Would anybody mind to check?

pbuilder is trying to debootstrap a 'sarge' chroot environment.
The gcc-3.4 archive does not have 'sarge' at the moment, only 
'unstable'. This is why the debootstrap cannot download packages
from 'sarge' and fails.

However, this may change soon. I have prepared a gcc-3.4 version
of 'sarge' and I plan to upload it to alioth at the end of this
week. The uploading process will take a few days because of the limited
upload bandwidth of my internet connection.

I had to to do some restructuring in my own gcc-3.4 archive to also 
handle 'sarge' in addition to 'unstable' and this lead to some delayed 
package updates on alioth. Sorry for the incoveniece this may have 
caused.

Regards
Andreas Jochens




Re: pbuilder maybe? Perhaps?

2004-11-01 Thread Harald Dunkel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jochens wrote:
|
| pbuilder is trying to debootstrap a 'sarge' chroot environment.
| The gcc-3.4 archive does not have 'sarge' at the moment, only
| 'unstable'. This is why the debootstrap cannot download packages
| from 'sarge' and fails.
|
Pbuilder does not support unstable, only sid. But for
sid I get the same error as for sarge:
Distribution is sid.
Building the build environment
~ - running debootstrap
I: Retrieving debootstrap.invalid_dists_sid_Release
I: Validating debootstrap.invalid_dists_sid_Release
I: Retrieving debootstrap.invalid_dists_sid_main_binary-amd64_Packages
I: Validating debootstrap.invalid_dists_sid_main_binary-amd64_Packages
W: 
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/dists/sid/main/binary-amd64/Packages.gz
 was corrupt
I: Retrieving debootstrap.invalid_dists_sid_main_binary-amd64_Packages
I: Validating debootstrap.invalid_dists_sid_main_binary-amd64_Packages
W: 
http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/gcc-3.4/dists/sid/main/binary-amd64/Packages
 was corrupt
I: Checking apt...
I: Checking base-files...
Did you note that there are some Packages.gz files from
4 days ago, while the up-to-date Packages.gz.new are
waiting to be renamed?
I would suggest to check the write permissions of the
Packages.gz and Sources.gz files and maybe the directories.
Regards
Harri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Debian - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFBhorrUTlbRTxpHjcRAiDRAJ9KQUqq1yEJf+e/bJRIr1KYdk91ZgCeK/0M
Kt8+PDtxE3OQUhTab3yG8Es=
=eioj
-END PGP SIGNATURE-



Re: pbuilder maybe? Perhaps?

2004-11-01 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 08:13:48PM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote:
 
 Did you note that there are some Packages.gz files from
 4 days ago, while the up-to-date Packages.gz.new are
 waiting to be renamed?

This seems to have been caused by the new archive key.  The
secret keyring had a size of 0.  The script stopped just
before it signed the Release file.  It's fixed now.


Kurt