Re: amd64 aalib debs in repository aren't built with X11
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 10:03:40AM -0700, Corey Hickey wrote: > Kurt Roeckx wrote: > > According to the buildd log: > > checking for X... no > > [...] > > Display drivers: > > slang > > curses > > Linux console > > > > I'll look into it shortly, and file a bug report. This is > > probably a case of incorrect build dependencies. bugs.debian.org/316557 Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: amd64 aalib debs in repository aren't built with X11
Kurt Roeckx wrote: > According to the buildd log: > checking for X... no > [...] > Display drivers: > slang > curses > Linux console > > I'll look into it shortly, and file a bug report. This is > probably a case of incorrect build dependencies. > Thank you. -Corey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: amd64 aalib debs in repository aren't built with X11
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 12:55:08AM -0700, Corey Hickey wrote: > Hello, > > I sent a message to this list on 2005-04-12: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/04/msg00370.html > > But didn't receive any response. I guess it just got lost in the pile. > For reference, I quote the body: > > --- > Aalib includes an X11 driver for its text rendering that is much faster > than the console drivers. For some reason the aalib debs on alioth > aren't built with X11 support. I can build the debs on my own machine > and they have X11 automatically, so I don't know what's wrong. According to the buildd log: checking for X... no [...] Display drivers: slang curses Linux console I'll look into it shortly, and file a bug report. This is probably a case of incorrect build dependencies. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
amd64 aalib debs in repository aren't built with X11
Hello, I sent a message to this list on 2005-04-12: http://lists.debian.org/debian-amd64/2005/04/msg00370.html But didn't receive any response. I guess it just got lost in the pile. For reference, I quote the body: --- Aalib includes an X11 driver for its text rendering that is much faster than the console drivers. For some reason the aalib debs on alioth aren't built with X11 support. I can build the debs on my own machine and they have X11 automatically, so I don't know what's wrong. --- The situation is still the same (although of course the debs are on amd64.debian.net now instead of alioth). The amd64 aalib1 package doesn't have X11 support, while the i386 deb does. By way of demonstration: --- [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ uname -a Linux bugfood 2.6.11.11 #1 Sun Jun 5 14:23:19 PDT 2005 x86_64 GNU/Linux [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache depends aalib1 aalib1 Depends: libc6 Depends: libgpmg1 Depends: libncurses5 Depends: libslang2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dchroot Executing shell in '32' chroot. [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ apt-cache depends aalib1 aalib1 Depends: libc6 Depends: libgpmg1 Depends: libncurses5 |Depends: libx11-6 Depends: xlibs Depends: slang1 --- I can't really give any more details; when I build the aalib debs from source they have X11 support and it works fine. I know this is a relatively small issue, but if you've never watched bb at high resolution with the X11 driver than you're missing out. :) -Corey -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
