Re: etch RC1 installer

2006-12-13 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:25:56PM -0800, Francesco Pietra wrote:
 Thank you for answering, though my point was to where
 learning as this my new installation without nvidia
 works. Why should I install nvidia when it works
 perfectly and very speedy? Finally, everything was
 done through official debian and I suppose they know
 how to do.

The nvidia binary driver does DRI openGL.  The free driver is 2D only.
I also believe the free driver doesn't do video playback acceleration
while the binary one does.  Of course if you never play video or use any
opengl programs, then there is no reason to use the binary driver.

--
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: etch RC1 installer

2006-12-13 Thread Lennart Sorensen
On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 03:23:41PM +, Paul Brook wrote:
 The open source driver does support video overlays, and seems to provide 
 hardware acceleration (I see a 10x reduction in CPU usage when xv is 
 enabled).
 
 There were issues with older kernels/XOrg (I'm not sure which) that made the 
 open source driver very slow on amd64. These seem to have been resolved now 
 and it works fine for 2D and video.

Oh good.  Well then the only reason for binary drivers is opengl I
guess.  How about multi monitor support on one card?  Does the free
driver do that yet?  How about tvout?

--
Len Sorensen


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: etch RC1 installer

2006-12-13 Thread Paul Brook
 The nvidia binary driver does DRI openGL.  The free driver is 2D only.
 I also believe the free driver doesn't do video playback acceleration
 while the binary one does. 

The open source driver does support video overlays, and seems to provide 
hardware acceleration (I see a 10x reduction in CPU usage when xv is 
enabled).

There were issues with older kernels/XOrg (I'm not sure which) that made the 
open source driver very slow on amd64. These seem to have been resolved now 
and it works fine for 2D and video.

Paul


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: etch RC1 installer

2006-12-13 Thread Paul Brook
On Wednesday 13 December 2006 15:24, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
 On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 03:23:41PM +, Paul Brook wrote:
  The open source driver does support video overlays, and seems to provide
  hardware acceleration (I see a 10x reduction in CPU usage when xv is
  enabled).
 
  There were issues with older kernels/XOrg (I'm not sure which) that made
  the open source driver very slow on amd64. These seem to have been
  resolved now and it works fine for 2D and video.

 Oh good.  Well then the only reason for binary drivers is opengl I
 guess.  How about multi monitor support on one card?  Does the free
 driver do that yet?  How about tvout?

I don't know.

Paul


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: etch RC1 installer

2006-12-13 Thread Francesco Pietra
Hi Len, Hi all:

I do use openGL for my molecular mechanics software
and with the etch RC1 installation I got it working
better than on previous use of nvidia drivers. Even in
combination with povray-3.6 (provided the official
package from povray is used; with the debian package
3.6 of povray I had troubles). Perhaps also because
now I use gnome. I merely downloaded from unstable
libmotif3_2.2.3-1.5.deb and installed it on my i386
etch (I am talking here about i386; on the amd64
machine I do mechanical/quantum/chemical computation
only, so that I have not yet got X). The libmotif on
etch does not afford support to openGL on my system.
Not even before when I used nvidia drivers. In fact, I
did the same as aboveon previous use of nvidia
drivers, although I had glx installed. Probably I had
a faulty installation. Now everything is fine.

No, I never play motion-picture, no time and I don't
like it on the small screen. And the great time of
motion-pictures is over.

cheers
francesco pietra


--- Lennart Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:25:56PM -0800, Francesco
 Pietra wrote:
  Thank you for answering, though my point was to
 where
  learning as this my new installation without
 nvidia
  works. Why should I install nvidia when it works
  perfectly and very speedy? Finally, everything was
  done through official debian and I suppose they
 know
  how to do.
 
 The nvidia binary driver does DRI openGL.  The free
 driver is 2D only.
 I also believe the free driver doesn't do video
 playback acceleration
 while the binary one does.  Of course if you never
 play video or use any
 opengl programs, then there is no reason to use the
 binary driver.
 
 --
 Len Sorensen
 



 

Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com.  Try it now.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: etch RC1 installer

2006-12-13 Thread Francesco Pietra
I must add to my email of the past few minutes that
even on my debian-like pivot_root install of knoppix
5.0.1 I had to install libmotif3_2.2.3-1.5_i386.deb to
get my molecular mechanics package working (openGL).
Surely knoppix 5.0.1 has nvidia acceleration. 

However, take my information as from a non-expert,
though, no doubt, the graphics of my application is in
openGL. 
cheers
francesco pietra

--- Lennart Sorensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:

 On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 11:25:56PM -0800, Francesco
 Pietra wrote:
  Thank you for answering, though my point was to
 where
  learning as this my new installation without
 nvidia
  works. Why should I install nvidia when it works
  perfectly and very speedy? Finally, everything was
  done through official debian and I suppose they
 know
  how to do.
 
 The nvidia binary driver does DRI openGL.  The free
 driver is 2D only.
 I also believe the free driver doesn't do video
 playback acceleration
 while the binary one does.  Of course if you never
 play video or use any
 opengl programs, then there is no reason to use the
 binary driver.
 
 --
 Len Sorensen
 



 

Any questions? Get answers on any topic at www.Answers.yahoo.com.  Try it now.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: etch RC1 installer

2006-12-13 Thread Jim Crilly
On 12/13/06 03:23:41PM +, Paul Brook wrote:
  The nvidia binary driver does DRI openGL.  The free driver is 2D only.
  I also believe the free driver doesn't do video playback acceleration
  while the binary one does. 
 
 The open source driver does support video overlays, and seems to provide 
 hardware acceleration (I see a 10x reduction in CPU usage when xv is 
 enabled).
 

What about at high resolutions though? According to this[1] bug report at
fd.o it's still broken and won't be fixed until at least Xorg 7.3. And the
last time I used the nv driver it was noticably slower than the binary
nvidia driver even at normal 2D desktop stuff, not that it was unusable or
anything but the speed difference is significant.

Jim.

[1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6151


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: etch RC1 installer

2006-12-13 Thread Jim Crilly
On 12/13/06 10:18:20PM +, Paul Brook wrote:
  What about at high resolutions though? According to this[1] bug report at
  fd.o it's still broken and won't be fixed until at least Xorg 7.3. And the
  last time I used the nv driver it was noticably slower than the binary
  nvidia driver even at normal 2D desktop stuff, not that it was unusable or
  anything but the speed difference is significant.
 
 I'm running amd64 Debian unstable at 1600x1200 on a 128Mb GF4200ti.
 
 Up until a couple of months or so ago it was painfully slow. I couldn't play 
 video above about 640x480, and other things (firefox, kpdf) were noticeably 
 slower than they should be.
 

Interesting, when I ran into the problem it was with the i386 port so that
may make a difference. I had assumed that the AMD64 port would have the
same limitations since it's a video thing but maybe that's not true. If I
get a chance I'll try switching this machine over to the nv driver and see
if Xv output in mplayer works, although it's a completely different machine
so it won't be a very good test but I'd still be interested in knowing if
it works or not.

Jim.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



etch RC1 installer

2006-12-12 Thread Francesco Pietra
Aimed at adding X to my amd64 etch workstation, I
wonder whether X is treated in amd64 (no 32 chroot,
pure 64 as far as it may be pur) like in i386.

In a new installation of i386 etch netinstall with
latest etch RC1, no nvidia driver was installed. I
took notice of what was installed for X, though I
would like to be directed to where learning in detail
how X is managed this way.

Specific to i386, while the machine has an Athlon k7
cpu, 
linux-image-2.6.17-2-486 (2.6.17-9)
linux-image-2.6-486 (2.617+2)
were installed instead of the avilable k7 equivalents.
Should I better reoplace them with the latter ones?

GNOME was installed (without asking for a choice,
which turned out to be favorable because now I have
nice printing, although I dislike automatic mounting
of devices). With KDE I had recently unresolved
unacceptance of root password, while I never succeeded
to print from KDE; I had to print from applications,
such as openoffice or al.)

Thanks for answering before I go to install X on the
amd64 machine, which I have to treat with special
care.

cheers
francesco pietra


 

Do you Yahoo!?
Everyone is raving about the all-new Yahoo! Mail beta.
http://new.mail.yahoo.com


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: etch RC1 installer

2006-12-12 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
Francesco Pietra [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 Aimed at adding X to my amd64 etch workstation, I
 wonder whether X is treated in amd64 (no 32 chroot,
 pure 64 as far as it may be pur) like in i386.

 In a new installation of i386 etch netinstall with
 latest etch RC1, no nvidia driver was installed. I
 took notice of what was installed for X, though I
 would like to be directed to where learning in detail
 how X is managed this way.

There is nothing special about X on amd64. It is the same as all other
archs.

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: etch RC1 installer

2006-12-12 Thread Francesco Pietra

--- Micha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
  In a new installation of i386 etch netinstall with
  latest etch RC1, no nvidia driver was installed.
 
 Install nvidia-kernel and nvidia-glx (binary
 drivers) 
 of debian unstable, latest version 1.0.8776-3.
 It runs with Xorg 7.1.1 but maybe lower too.
 
 Install and run nvidia-xconfig, too, plus the nvidia
 
 'controlcenter' package nvidia-settings.

Thank you for answering, though my point was to where
learning as this my new installation without nvidia
works. Why should I install nvidia when it works
perfectly and very speedy? Finally, everything was
done through official debian and I suppose they know
how to do.

francesco pietra
 
 
 
 
  m°
 
 



 

Have a burning question?  
Go to www.Answers.yahoo.com and get answers from real people who know.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]