seahorse (gnome, gpg) encryption error
Been having problems with Seahorse and encryption from gnome. (Nautilus, Gedit, Evolution) When I try to sign, I get the error "Couldn't Load Keys" When I try to Encrypt, it loads the keys for selection and then exists when I try to encrypt without and error. It was working before I upgraded from sarge to testing, Is anyone else facing this same problem? I created a new user to test out any config issues, but the very same problem persists. In Evolution I get the message : "Broken Pipe, you might need to select different options", when I try to send mail, but it verifies signed mails. Logs reveal this: kernel: seahorse-tool[6411] general protection rip:2b8efb68db3a rsp:7fffaec24200 error:0 If this is indeed a bug, someone should be seeing something similar. Closest is this, but filed against vesion seahorse 0.90.2 (unsure) http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=363528 (I should mention that I can use gpg from the command line without errors) -- Running on testing, AMD64, Kernel 2.6.17-2 Seahorse : 0.9.5-2 any ideas? with best regards, Erle Pereira, Systems Consultant web: http://www.erlepereira.com -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG error when apt-get update
On Mon, Jan 30, 2006 at 02:02:30AM +0100, Francesco Namuri wrote: > hi, > > when i execute "apt-get update" twice the first time I not have any problem, > the second time > I got: "W: GPG error: http://ftp.it.debian.org testing Release: Unknown error > executing gpgv" > > any ideas? I don't know the solution, but note that it's not an error, only a warning. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Digital signature
GPG error when apt-get update
hi, when i execute "apt-get update" twice the first time I not have any problem, the second time I got: "W: GPG error: http://ftp.it.debian.org testing Release: Unknown error executing gpgv" any ideas? I check for the key of the mirror, it's in my keyring... thanks in advance and sorry for my english... :) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [SPAM] Re: apt-get: Where to get the gpg-key?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ha! Yes, my mistake. Apparently the package debian-archive-keyring was already installed on my amd64 (HP Pavilion zv6000 series - zv6100 in bios, zv6201cl on paper label), but it just popped up in the i386 mirror. My error. fgd. J. Paul Bissonnette wrote: > I know it is in the i32 repository, have used it with the amd64 yet. > Just got a amd64, haven't had much time to get the 64 bit OS running. > > Sorry for all the posting, I hit Reply to all by mistake, try not to do > that again, I hope. :) > > Fielder George Dowding wrote: > > Hmmm... it appears that the package debian-archive-keyring is new at > least to my local mirror which I have just updated today. fgd. > > J. Paul Bissonnette wrote: > > >>>> rainer herrendoerfer wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> During >>>>> >>>>> # apt-get update >>>>> >>>>> I received the >>>>> >>>>> "GPG error ... NO_PUBKEY 22DB56F984478DDF" >>>>> >>>>> I tried >>>>> >>>>> # gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys 22DB56F984478DDF >>>>> >>>>> but: >>>>> gpg: requesting key 84478DDF from hkp server wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net >>>>> gpgkeys: key 22DB56F984478DDF not found on keyserver >>>>> >>>>> keyring.debian.org worked neither. What did I miss? >>>>> >>>>> Raina >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> try >>>> apt-get install debian-archive-keyring >>>> then apt-get update >>>> >>>> Paul >>>> >>>> > > > -- > Fielder George Dowding, Chief Iceworm.^. Debian/GNU Linux > dba Iceworm Enterprises, Anchorage, Alaska /v\ "etch" Testing > Since 1976 - Over 25 Years of Service. /( )\ User Number 269482 >^^-^^ "irad" 301256 >> >> >> - -- Fielder George Dowding, Chief Iceworm.^. Debian/GNU Linux dba Iceworm Enterprises, Anchorage, Alaska /v\ "etch" Testing Since 1976 - Over 25 Years of Service. /( )\ User Number 269482 ^^-^^ "irad" 301256 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD2pS52kl99FX0AIkRAuKlAKCb1BxkYL/G4xdpkZJA5Jgt7kuy7QCghI9S 9a5Lngu6+5lsk4mQpVljpF8= =1HK2 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get: Where to get the gpg-key?
I know it is in the i32 repository, have used it with the amd64 yet. Just got a amd64, haven't had much time to get the 64 bit OS running. Sorry for all the posting, I hit Reply to all by mistake, try not to do that again, I hope. :) Fielder George Dowding wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hmmm... it appears that the package debian-archive-keyring is new at least to my local mirror which I have just updated today. fgd. J. Paul Bissonnette wrote: rainer herrendoerfer wrote: Hi, During # apt-get update I received the "GPG error ... NO_PUBKEY 22DB56F984478DDF" I tried # gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys 22DB56F984478DDF but: gpg: requesting key 84478DDF from hkp server wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net gpgkeys: key 22DB56F984478DDF not found on keyserver keyring.debian.org worked neither. What did I miss? Raina try apt-get install debian-archive-keyring then apt-get update Paul - -- Fielder George Dowding, Chief Iceworm.^. Debian/GNU Linux dba Iceworm Enterprises, Anchorage, Alaska /v\ "etch" Testing Since 1976 - Over 25 Years of Service. /( )\ User Number 269482 ^^-^^ "irad" 301256 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD2cTO2kl99FX0AIkRAuF+AJ9gII2wanX/fB1Teaqvm/6xComwxQCfXSRB 47+62lhNIgZeo3UkdLFCz+s= =Hstw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- J. Paul Bissonnette http://canadian-dream.com begin:vcard fn:J. Paul Bissonnette n:Bissonnette;J. Paul adr:;;272 Nac master Road;Antigonish;NS;B2G 2K8;Canada email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;work:1 902 872 1034 tel;fax:1 902 735 2404 tel;home:1 902 867 1897 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://http:canadian-dream.com version:2.1 end:vcard
Re: [SPAM] Re: apt-get: Where to get the gpg-key?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hmmm... it appears that the package debian-archive-keyring is new at least to my local mirror which I have just updated today. fgd. J. Paul Bissonnette wrote: > rainer herrendoerfer wrote: > >> Hi, >> During >> >> # apt-get update >> >> I received the >> >> "GPG error ... NO_PUBKEY 22DB56F984478DDF" >> >> I tried >> >> # gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys 22DB56F984478DDF >> >> but: >> gpg: requesting key 84478DDF from hkp server wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net >> gpgkeys: key 22DB56F984478DDF not found on keyserver >> >> keyring.debian.org worked neither. What did I miss? >> >> Raina >> >> >> >> > try > apt-get install debian-archive-keyring > then apt-get update > > Paul > - -- Fielder George Dowding, Chief Iceworm.^. Debian/GNU Linux dba Iceworm Enterprises, Anchorage, Alaska /v\ "etch" Testing Since 1976 - Over 25 Years of Service. /( )\ User Number 269482 ^^-^^ "irad" 301256 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFD2cTO2kl99FX0AIkRAuF+AJ9gII2wanX/fB1Teaqvm/6xComwxQCfXSRB 47+62lhNIgZeo3UkdLFCz+s= =Hstw -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get: Where to get the gpg-key?
rainer herrendoerfer wrote: Hi, During # apt-get update I received the "GPG error ... NO_PUBKEY 22DB56F984478DDF" I tried # gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys 22DB56F984478DDF but: gpg: requesting key 84478DDF from hkp server wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net gpgkeys: key 22DB56F984478DDF not found on keyserver keyring.debian.org worked neither. What did I miss? Raina try apt-get install debian-archive-keyring then apt-get update Paul -- J. Paul Bissonnette http://canadian-dream.com begin:vcard fn:J. Paul Bissonnette n:Bissonnette;J. Paul adr:;;272 Nac master Road;Antigonish;NS;B2G 2K8;Canada email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED] tel;work:1 902 872 1034 tel;fax:1 902 735 2404 tel;home:1 902 867 1897 x-mozilla-html:TRUE url:http://http:canadian-dream.com version:2.1 end:vcard
Re: apt-get: Where to get the gpg-key?
Sorry, buggy sources.list! I had a local file in it. Removed and now everything works fine again. Thanks for your efford, have a nice evening Raina -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get: Where to get the gpg-key?
> > Did you already read: http://wiki.debian.org/SecureApt ? > Meanwhile yes, but I didn't get the difference. -? I have this keys in my list: # apt-key list /etc/apt/trusted.gpg pub 1024D/B5F5BBED 2005-04-24 uid Debian AMD64 Archive Key sub 2048g/34FC6FE5 2005-04-24 pub 1024D/2D230C5F 2006-01-03 [expires: 2007-02-07] uid Debian Archive Automatic Signing Key (2006) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> So as I understand if I get a GPG error with NO_PUBKEY 22DB56F984478DDF I have to fetch it with sth. like (quote from your link): > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~>gpg --keyserver pgpkeys.mit.edu --recv-key NrOfMissingKey but the key isn't found on several keyservers. > > It depends on what package your are trying to install. > I just ran apt-get update. Didn't try to install anything. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get: Where to get the gpg-key?
On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 04:39:44PM +0100, rainer herrendoerfer wrote: > Hi, > During > > # apt-get update > > I received the > > "GPG error ... NO_PUBKEY 22DB56F984478DDF" And from where are you trying to download something? Maybe this is some package repository for something that isn't in Debian? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apt-get: Where to get the gpg-key?
It depends on what package your are trying to install. Is the package signed with a key that would be on wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net? What repository is the package from? rainer herrendoerfer wrote: > Hi, > During > > # apt-get update > > I received the > > "GPG error ... NO_PUBKEY 22DB56F984478DDF" > > I tried > > # gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys 22DB56F984478DDF > > but: > gpg: requesting key 84478DDF from hkp server wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net > gpgkeys: key 22DB56F984478DDF not found on keyserver > > keyring.debian.org worked neither. What did I miss? > > Raina > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
apt-get: Where to get the gpg-key?
Hi, During # apt-get update I received the "GPG error ... NO_PUBKEY 22DB56F984478DDF" I tried # gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys 22DB56F984478DDF but: gpg: requesting key 84478DDF from hkp server wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net gpgkeys: key 22DB56F984478DDF not found on keyserver keyring.debian.org worked neither. What did I miss? Raina -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian problems with gpg-key?
sigi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > >> > today I tried to update my debian-system, but there was a problem to >> > authenticate the gpg-keys: >> > >> >>-----< >> > W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.nerim.net etch Release: >> > The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is >> > not available: NO_PUBKEY 07DC563D1F41B907 >> >> That isn't from the Debian-amd64 port. You have to ask the owner of >> that for the right key. >> >> > W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.de.debian.org stable Release: >> > The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is >> > not available: >> > NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED >> > >> > W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.de.debian.org testing Release: >> > The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public >> > key is not available: NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED >> >> http://amd64.debian.net/archive.key >> >> pub 1024D/B5F5BBED 2005-04-24 >> Key fingerprint = C20C A1D9 499D ECBB D8BD ACF9 E415 B2B4 B5F5 BBED >> uid Debian AMD64 Archive Key >> sub 2048g/34FC6FE5 2005-04-24 >> >> That is the normal Archive key ever since the archive moved to >> amd64.debian.net. >> > > But why do I have these problems since yesterday? And why do I have the > wrong keys for _all_ my sources on my list since yesterday (not only > for the debian-servers)? Because yesterday you updated apt from sarge to etch/sid. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian problems with gpg-key?
> But why do I have these problems since yesterday? And why do I have the > wrong keys for _all_ my sources on my list since yesterday (not only > for the debian-servers)? Don't know it yet... > How/Where can I correct this? wget http://amd64.debian.net/archive.key apt-key add archive.key this worked. sigi. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian problems with gpg-key?
Hi, > > today I tried to update my debian-system, but there was a problem to > > authenticate the gpg-keys: > > > >>---------< > > W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.nerim.net etch Release: > > The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is > > not available: NO_PUBKEY 07DC563D1F41B907 > > That isn't from the Debian-amd64 port. You have to ask the owner of > that for the right key. > > > W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.de.debian.org stable Release: > > The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is > > not available: > > NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED > > > > W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.de.debian.org testing Release: > > The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public > > key is not available: NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED > > http://amd64.debian.net/archive.key > > pub 1024D/B5F5BBED 2005-04-24 > Key fingerprint = C20C A1D9 499D ECBB D8BD ACF9 E415 B2B4 B5F5 BBED > uid Debian AMD64 Archive Key > sub 2048g/34FC6FE5 2005-04-24 > > That is the normal Archive key ever since the archive moved to > amd64.debian.net. > But why do I have these problems since yesterday? And why do I have the wrong keys for _all_ my sources on my list since yesterday (not only for the debian-servers)? How/Where can I correct this? sigi. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian problems with gpg-key?
sigi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > today I tried to update my debian-system, but there was a problem to > authenticate the gpg-keys: > >>-----< > W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.nerim.net etch Release: > The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is > not available: NO_PUBKEY 07DC563D1F41B907 That isn't from the Debian-amd64 port. You have to ask the owner of that for the right key. > W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.de.debian.org stable Release: > The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is > not available: > NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED > > W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.de.debian.org testing Release: > The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public > key is not available: NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED http://amd64.debian.net/archive.key pub 1024D/B5F5BBED 2005-04-24 Key fingerprint = C20C A1D9 499D ECBB D8BD ACF9 E415 B2B4 B5F5 BBED uid Debian AMD64 Archive Key sub 2048g/34FC6FE5 2005-04-24 That is the normal Archive key ever since the archive moved to amd64.debian.net. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian problems with gpg-key?
most of the packages on my mirros (espri.arizona.edu) aren't authenticated either. I'd like to hear any information on this as well.
debian problems with gpg-key?
Hi, today I tried to update my debian-system, but there was a problem to authenticate the gpg-keys: >-< W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.nerim.net etch Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 07DC563D1F41B907 W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.de.debian.org stable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED W: GPG error: ftp://ftp.de.debian.org testing Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED [...] >< did they all generate new keys and I didn't receive them? thanks for your help, sigi. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG marillat
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 09:15, Marko Kaiser wrote: > Read this: > > http://cvs.cinelerra.org/getting_cinelerra.html > > Regards, > Marko That helps thanks. Would you know where to get the keys for the following? W: GPG error: file: sarge Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 3B9DED8C27F24D73 W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net sid Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net sarge Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED I would be nice to have aptitude install without complaining about keys... TIA Ed Tomlinson -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG marillat
Did that. Still get "untrusted source" for liblame0. Using deb http://spello.sscnet.ucla.edu/marillat/ sid main ran gpg --keyserver hkp://wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys 1F41B907 gpg --armor --export 1F41B907 | sudo apt-key add - no errors. Is this keyring for spello.sscnet.ucla.edu ? Any ideas? On Wed, 2005-09-28 at 15:15 +0200, Marko Kaiser wrote: > Read this: > > http://cvs.cinelerra.org/getting_cinelerra.html > > Regards, > Marko > > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG marillat
Read this: http://cvs.cinelerra.org/getting_cinelerra.html Regards, Marko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG marillat
On Wednesday 28 September 2005 03:11, Marko Kaiser wrote: > Hello, > > get dists/sid/Release.gpg and add that key via apt-key add. > > Bye, > Marko grover:/home/ed# apt-key add marillat_Release.gpg gpg: no valid OpenPGP data found. grover:/home/ed# cat marillat_Release.gpg -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDN7jkB9xWPR9BuQcRAomXAKCIB3mxJ/RD8ogR6nNBv3xjN6A99wCdEK5k cdav48pWw/l4U/xj5Y2vOs8= =LBMR -END PGP SIGNATURE- grover:/home/ed# What else has to be done? TIA Ed -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG marillat
Hello, get dists/sid/Release.gpg and add that key via apt-key add. Bye, Marko -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG marillat
Anyone know how to get apt to accept packages from http://spello.sscnet.ucla.edu/marillat/ sid main as trusted? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG burns my notebook!
antongiulio05 wrote:
> Hi Corey,
>
> I have launched your script in my chroot (after installed 'hwtools'), but I
> got these errors:
>
> $ sh temptests.sh all
> Running test: test_idle
> cat: /sys/bus/i2c/devices/0-0290/temp1_input: No such file or directory
> temptests.sh: line 85: / 1000: syntax error: operand expected (error token is
> "/ 1000")
>
> Giulio
>
>
Well, I'm back from vacation now.
If you want to run my script you need to configure it for your system. I
guess I'll go into more detail.
1. In Linux 2.6 all the lm_sensors drivers create sysfs "files". You
need to find your CPU sensor file. 'cd /sys/bus/i2c/devices' and see
what's there; you should find one or more symlinks to directories. Look
inside each one. The files named temp*_input correspond to the
temperature sensors. Cat each one until you see which corresponds to
your CPU temperature (they're probably scaled by 1000).
2. Open the script in a text editor. Near the top you'll see a
"TWEAKABLE VARIABLES" section. Think of that like a configuration file.
Replace the value being assigned to SENSOR with the path to the sysfs
file you found in the previous step. If necessary, replace the value
being assigned to DIVISOR too.
---
...at this point some people might be wondering why I don't just parse
the output of the sensors command. Catting a file and letting the shell
divide by 1000 is a lot faster than "sensors | awk '/CPU Temp:/ {print
$3}'", the fastest parse I can think of. Maybe I'm being picky, but I
wanted to avoid extra CPU use.
---
3. Look at the other values in the "TWEAKABLE VARIABLES" section. Change
them if you want.
4. Keep going down to the "TEST FUNCTIONS" section. Look at the
functions that start with test_. All the commands in those functions
must run on your system or the script will quit in the middle of a run.
You'll notice that I use dchroot for the programs that must run in my
32-bit chroot. All the other programs are in my shell's $PATH. Your
system will likely differ from mine and some of those commands will not
run. You have three options:
Option 1:
Alter the command to work on your system: remove "dchroot" if you need
to, type in an absolute path, etc.
Option 2:
Alter your system so the command works: configure dchroot, download
prime95 and cpuburn-in and put them in your $PATH, etc.
Option 3:
Remove the test if you're not interested in it or you can't make it run.
To do this, don't bother deleting the function -- just disable it by
removing its name from the ALL_TESTS variable up in the "TWEAKABLE
VARIABLES" section.
-Corey
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG burns my notebook!
I have installed gdesklets to monitoring cpu, memory, ecc via desktop, and so I have discovered strange behaviour. Example: launch from root 'cfdisk' too see partition and close it normally. On gdesklets I read CPU working ~99%. Top confirms cfdisk 'burn' my cpu and so 'killall cfdisk'. After a few of seconds, I read again CPU working ~99%. Top show 'top' self use my cpu 99% and 'killall' again. It's same thing with 'gpg' at start of this thread. Have you any idea? Thanks, Giulio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG burns my notebook!
> You should also try burnK7 of the cpuburn package. Unfortunately there > isn't an amd64 deb of cpuburn, but it works fine in my i386 chroot. > > This thread inspired me to run a few tests to see what program makes my > CPU run the hottest. My somewhat overclocked machine had been running > for over a month, even with me playing games in hotter weather than it > is now -- and burnK7 crashed my computer. > > I wrote a script to test several programs and graph the temperatures > reached. I thought it might be of general interest so I attached it and > the output on my machine. > > Run the script with no arguments for a usage explanation. It's meant to > be tweaked and I wrote it in such a way that it should be easy to do so. > Just put the script in an empty directory somewhere first; it makes a > lot of intermediate data files when it runs the tests. > > I won't be around for the next week but I wanted to get that out before > this thread sinks into oblivion. Hi Corey, I have launched your script in my chroot (after installed 'hwtools'), but I got these errors: $ sh temptests.sh all Running test: test_idle cat: /sys/bus/i2c/devices/0-0290/temp1_input: No such file or directory temptests.sh: line 85: / 1000: syntax error: operand expected (error token is "/ 1000") Giulio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG burns my notebook!
Dne ne 10. července 2005 1:51 Miroslav Maiksnar napsal(a): > I just out of curiosity tried burnK7 on my nearly 2y old A64 3200+ (oldest > 2GHz 754 socket version) and after 15 minutes CPU raises from 42 to 43 > degrees (using ondemand governor I have 800MHz idle), but system > temperature raises from some 38 to 58 degrees (and still slowly raising)... sorry for typo, it should be "from 28 to 58 degrees" Mixi
Re: GPG burns my notebook!
Dne so 9. července 2005 20:07 Corey Hickey napsal(a): > You should also try burnK7 of the cpuburn package. Unfortunately there > isn't an amd64 deb of cpuburn, but it works fine in my i386 chroot. > > This thread inspired me to run a few tests to see what program makes my > CPU run the hottest. My somewhat overclocked machine had been running > for over a month, even with me playing games in hotter weather than it > is now -- and burnK7 crashed my computer. I just out of curiosity tried burnK7 on my nearly 2y old A64 3200+ (oldest 2GHz 754 socket version) and after 15 minutes CPU raises from 42 to 43 degrees (using ondemand governor I have 800MHz idle), but system temperature raises from some 38 to 58 degrees (and still slowly raising)... kind of funny, but maybe possible since CPU has quite good active cooling and MB only passive (MSI K8T Neo). BTW, doom3 heats CPU up to 45 degrees and even don't use 100% CPU time (about 60% average), main load gets GPU @ 1600x1200 (some 82 degrees according to `nvidia-settings`) ;o) Mixi
Re: GPG burns my notebook!
antongiulio05 wrote: >>>At start, notebook temperature was for thermal 1: 40 C and thermal 2: 47 C >>>(from 'acpi -V'). Running command above (and so 'gpg' process) my system >>>becomes unstable (auto key pressing etc.), and temperature is jumped to 55 C >>>for 1, and 88 C for 2 in one minute. Top command returned 'gpg' cpu-usage >>>99%. Is it a debian problem or a notebook strange behavior? I have an acer >>>1524wlmi. >> >>It's normal for CPU activity to increase heat. It's a hardware problem if >>it increases that much. >> >>Get it serviced! > > > Yes:) However I'm running (how Gnu-Raiz suggests) "prime 95" to stress > processor. Temperature is constant. And it doesn't show unstability. I'll > continue test for many hours again. > > Thanks, > Giulio > > You should also try burnK7 of the cpuburn package. Unfortunately there isn't an amd64 deb of cpuburn, but it works fine in my i386 chroot. This thread inspired me to run a few tests to see what program makes my CPU run the hottest. My somewhat overclocked machine had been running for over a month, even with me playing games in hotter weather than it is now -- and burnK7 crashed my computer. I wrote a script to test several programs and graph the temperatures reached. I thought it might be of general interest so I attached it and the output on my machine. Run the script with no arguments for a usage explanation. It's meant to be tweaked and I wrote it in such a way that it should be easy to do so. Just put the script in an empty directory somewhere first; it makes a lot of intermediate data files when it runs the tests. I won't be around for the next week but I wanted to get that out before this thread sinks into oblivion. -Corey temptests.sh Description: Bourne shell script
Re: GPG burns my notebook!
On Fri, 8 Jul 2005, antongiulio05 wrote: Yes:) However I'm running (how Gnu-Raiz suggests) "prime 95" to stress processor. Temperature is constant. And it doesn't show unstability. I'll continue test for many hours again. Heat problems can be intermittent. Heat is regulated by some of the more unreliable mechanical systems in a computer. Fans getting stuck, etc. If I ever experienced the temps you describe, I would skip the preliminaries and send it back. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG burns my notebook!
> > At start, notebook temperature was for thermal 1: 40 C and thermal 2: 47 C > > (from 'acpi -V'). Running command above (and so 'gpg' process) my system > > becomes unstable (auto key pressing etc.), and temperature is jumped to 55 > > C for 1, and 88 C for 2 in one minute. Top command returned 'gpg' cpu-usage > > 99%. Is it a debian problem or a notebook strange behavior? I have an acer > > 1524wlmi. > > It's normal for CPU activity to increase heat. It's a hardware problem if > it increases that much. > > Get it serviced! Yes:) However I'm running (how Gnu-Raiz suggests) "prime 95" to stress processor. Temperature is constant. And it doesn't show unstability. I'll continue test for many hours again. Thanks, Giulio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG burns my notebook!
On Thu, 7 Jul 2005, antongiulio05 wrote: At start, notebook temperature was for thermal 1: 40 C and thermal 2: 47 C (from 'acpi -V'). Running command above (and so 'gpg' process) my system becomes unstable (auto key pressing etc.), and temperature is jumped to 55 C for 1, and 88 C for 2 in one minute. Top command returned 'gpg' cpu-usage 99%. Is it a debian problem or a notebook strange behavior? I have an acer 1524wlmi. It's normal for CPU activity to increase heat. It's a hardware problem if it increases that much. Get it serviced! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG burns my notebook!
On 20:06, Thu 07 Jul 05, antongiulio05 wrote: > Hi, > > this is not a joke:) > Reading posts about GPG-errors for last apt version, I have launched: > > apt-key add keyfile. > > At start, notebook temperature was for thermal 1: 40 C and thermal 2: 47 C > (from 'acpi -V'). Running command above (and so 'gpg' process) my system > becomes unstable (auto key pressing etc.), and temperature is jumped to 55 C > for 1, and 88 C for 2 in one minute. Top command returned 'gpg' cpu-usage > 99%. Is it a debian problem or a notebook strange behavior? I have an acer > 1524wlmi. > > Thanks > Giulio > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > If your notebook is under warranty I would RMA it, also I would run some more test's such as prime 95, or RC5-72 something that will stress the processor. Even if they use a desktop chip in a laptop, the manufacture needs to remember the intended use of the laptop. An over heatings laptop is not considered workable in my book, you should be able to use the laptop as a server and still not have it over heat. In other words a laptop cpu should be able to run at 100% all the time and not have any major problems, if your needing an external cooler because its too hot this is another reason to send it back. I would also check the back connectors, such as the serial ports, and usb ports, if they feel hot to the touch, then I would send it back, maybe the cpu heatsink is not properly installed. Just because its a laptop does not mean you need to baby it, its a computer a portable one, it should be able to be used as such, if it can't then something is wrong. On my wifes laptop, it runs RC5-72 24/7, I tell her she can shut it off it she wants, but she keeps telling me that it takes too long to boot. I said thats fine leave it on then, it sometimes goes weeks without being turned off. If I sense something is wrong with it, I will not hesitate to send it back for RMA. Gnu_Raiz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG burns my notebook!
> > > sam to me. I also have an Acer1524WLMI, but everytime I use apt the > > > cooler begins to run. Don worry, this seems to be o.k. I suppose, apt is > > > using all the processing time, and so the AMD64-processor is getting hot. > > > Remember, it so not a mobile-processor. > > > > CPU on my nb runs with 800MHZ (governor: userspace - minimal frequency > > reachable) and I have an external cooler too. Does your system become > > unstable when you use apt all the processing time? > No, it does not really. Things become slow, while apt is readibg the database > from harddrive, so, some other things become slow, when they want to write or > read on the harddrive, too. But it is not getting unstable. Hi, I have tried with 2 keys. One from amd64.debian.net/archive.key that make burning my system, and one from http://wwwkeys.pgp.net:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xB5F5BBED last key works and I got soon 'OK' from apt-key add. $ diff from_debian.key from wwwkeys_pgp.key 2,3c2,3 < Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) < Comment: Joerg Jaspert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Debian Developer --- > Version: 5.0 > Comment: PGP Key Server 0.9.4+patch2+JHpatch1+p20020525 15,19c15,17 < XgQTEQIAHgUCQmvPKwIbAwYLCQgHAwIDFQIDAxYCAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDkFbK0tfW7 < 7VJ0AJ9Mo/oqzyumFCVQvWYVvxBsjk6ewgCfZZRNf/DR6JtyetzVQIJLOjl8veiI < RgQQEQIABgUCQnan1gAKCRBxXtagfnuKyYvkAJ9FnlqAN3VTaLqMv6riY5OZ8Q8I < qACfQdLinAPJsjAVtcg1UWUC7owKlm+IRgQQEQIABgUCQns3fwAKCRBBKx4xgXqZ < alDXAKCw60pcR6GYbkmMtF9nm1q/lxLbSgCguM9/1hlvBDk5gllldrFTqgVnDraI --- > RgQQEQIABgUCQns3fwAKCRBBKx4xgXqZalDXAKCw60pcR6GYbkmMtF9nm1q/lxLb > SgCguM9/1hlvBDk5gllldrFTqgVnDraIRgQQEQIABgUCQnan1gAKCRBxXtagfnuK > yYvkAJ9FnlqAN3VTaLqMv6riY5OZ8Q8IqACfQdLinAPJsjAVtcg1UWUC7owKlm+I 21c19,21 < nACeN9G21iPzqOi3Ewmf3woQcwf4wTS5Ag0EQmvPMxAIAOr1j+gORprF8BnY2/yJ --- > nACeN9G21iPzqOi3Ewmf3woQcwf4wTSIXgQTEQIAHgUCQmvPKwIbAwYLCQgHAwID > FQIDAxYCAQIeAQIXgAAKCRDkFbK0tfW77VJ0AJ9Mo/oqzyumFCVQvWYVvxBsjk6e > wgCfZZRNf/DR6JtyetzVQIJLOjl8vei5Ag0EQmvPMxAIAOr1j+gORprF8BnY2/yJ 35c35 < =Ncml --- > =gM3z Keys seem partially different. I'm not a GPG expert but I think problem is related to key. Giulio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG burns my notebook!
> I tried your settings in XF86Config-4. Sad, they do not work, same as before. > Monitor gets bright, whren switching to konsole. It seems to be a hardware > problem. Nevertheless, with your settings, the screen was not so nice as mine > (my personal meaning :)) ) So, maybe, you will try my one ? Save your own, > and test it, so you can switch back, if you do not like it. Hi Hans, nice your settings:) more clean fonts and more brightness Thanks Giulio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG burns my notebook!
Am Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2005 21:35 schrieb antongiulio05: > > What do you have for a performance with youre XF86Config-Settings ? I > > have about 3220 FPS with glxgears ( in KDE, fvwm is a little bit faster). > > I have same performances suppose: > $ glxgears > 13341 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2668.200 FPS > 15442 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3088.400 FPS > 16026 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3205.200 FPS > 14487 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2897.400 FPS > 14994 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2998.800 FPS > 14035 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2807.000 FPS > 15095 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3019.000 FPS > 15621 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3124.200 FPS > 14752 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2950.400 FPS > > (I'm using many other apps on KDE 3.4.1 now) > > I have Fvwm too, but I have not tried with it. > > Regards, > Giulio Hi Gulio, I tried your settings in XF86Config-4. Sad, they do not work, same as before. Monitor gets bright, whren switching to konsole. It seems to be a hardware problem. Nevertheless, with your settings, the screen was not so nice as mine (my personal meaning :)) ) So, maybe, you will try my one ? Save your own, and test it, so you can switch back, if you do not like it. Here it is snip --- # XF86Config-4 (XFree86 X Window System server configuration file) # # This file was generated by dexconf, the Debian X Configuration tool, using # values from the debconf database. # # Edit this file with caution, and see the XF86Config-4 manual page. # (Type "man XF86Config-4" at the shell prompt.) # # This file is automatically updated on xserver-xfree86 package upgrades *only* # if it has not been modified since the last upgrade of the xserver-xfree86 # package. # # If you have edited this file but would like it to be automatically updated # again, run the following commands as root: # # cp /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 /etc/X11/XF86Config-4.custom # md5sum /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 >/var/lib/xfree86/XF86Config-4.md5sum # dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xfree86 Section "Files" FontPath"unix/:7100"# local font server # if the local font server has problems, we can fall back on these FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/misc" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/cyrillic" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/:unscaled" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/:unscaled" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Type1" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/CID" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi" FontPath"/usr/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi" EndSection Section "Module" ## Load"GLcore" # Load"bitmap" Load"dbe" # Load"ddc" ## Load"dri" Load"extmod" Load"freetype" Load"glx" # Load"int10" # Load"record" Load"speedo" Load"type1" Load"vbe" Load"synaptics" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Driver"synaptics" Identifier"Mouse[1]" Option"Device""/dev/psaux" Option"Protocol" "auto-dev" Option"LeftEdge" "1700" Option"RightEdge" "5300" Option"TopEdge" "1700" Option"BottomEdge""4200" Option"FingerLow" "25" Option"FingerHigh""30" Option"MaxTapTime""180" Option"MaxTapMove""220" Option"VertScrollDelta" "100" Option"MinSpeed" "0.06" Option"MaxSpeed" "0.12" Option"AccelFactor" "0.0010" Option"SHMConfig" "on" # Option "Repeater" "/dev/ps2mouse" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Generic Keyboard" Driver "keyboard" Option "CoreKeyboard" Option "XkbRules" "xfree86" Option "XkbModel" "armada" Option "XkbLayout" "de" Option "XkbOptions""nodeadkeys" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Configured Mouse" Driver "mouse" # Option "CorePointer" Option "Device""/dev/psaux" Option "Protocol" "ImPS/2" Option "Emulate3Buttons" "true" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Generic Mouse" Driver "mouse" Option "SendCoreEvents""true" Option "Device""/dev/input/mice" Option "Protocol" "ImPS/2" Option "Emulate3Buttons" "true" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" EndSection Section "Device" Identifier "NVIDIA GeForce" Driver "nvidia" Option "RenderAccel" "true" O
Re: GPG burns my notebook!
> What do you have for a performance with youre XF86Config-Settings ? I have > about 3220 FPS with glxgears ( in KDE, fvwm is a little bit faster). I have same performances suppose: $ glxgears 13341 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2668.200 FPS 15442 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3088.400 FPS 16026 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3205.200 FPS 14487 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2897.400 FPS 14994 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2998.800 FPS 14035 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2807.000 FPS 15095 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3019.000 FPS 15621 frames in 5.0 seconds = 3124.200 FPS 14752 frames in 5.0 seconds = 2950.400 FPS (I'm using many other apps on KDE 3.4.1 now) I have Fvwm too, but I have not tried with it. Regards, Giulio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG burns my notebook!
Am Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2005 21:03 schrieb antongiulio05: > Hi Hans, Hi Gulio, > > sam to me. I also have an Acer1524WLMI, but everytime I use apt the > > cooler begins to run. Don worry, this seems to be o.k. I suppose, apt is > > using all the processing time, and so the AMD64-processor is getting hot. > > Remember, it so not a mobile-processor. > > CPU on my nb runs with 800MHZ (governor: userspace - minimal frequency > reachable) and I have an external cooler too. Does your system become > unstable when you use apt all the processing time? No, it does not really. Things become slow, while apt is readibg the database from harddrive, so, some other things become slow, when they want to write or read on the harddrive, too. But it is not getting unstable. What do you have for a performance with youre XF86Config-Settings ? I have about 3220 FPS with glxgears ( in KDE, fvwm is a little bit faster). > > Othe thing by the way: I use Nvidia-acceleration, the glx module. When I > > use this, I cannot switsch to console. The screen is getting bright. > > Switching back to window-manager is o.k. This happens only with glx > > module. The nv module works fine. > > I have nvidia module installed too. In XF86Config-4 I have: > > load "glx" > > and this settings for monitor: > > Section "Modes" > Identifier "16:10" > # 1280x800 @ 50.00 Hz (GTF) hsync: 41.20 kHz; pclk: 68.56 MHz > #Modeline "1280x800" 68.56 1280 1336 1472 1664 800 801 804 824 -HSync > +Vsync ModeLine "1280x800" 68.9 1280 1304 1336 1408 800 804 808 816 > EndSection > > Section "Monitor" > Identifier "Monitor Generico" > UseModes"16:10" > #HorizSync 28-50 > #VertRefresh43-75 > Option "DPMS" > EndSection > > However I can switch to console without problems and I have not bright > problems. > > Can you use IPNCOMM 2220 wireless internal card and winmodem on debian? No, sadly I still can not. You must use ndiswrapper, but I could not find the 64-Bit-driver, only 32-Bit. So, this will not work, yet. > > Giulio Best regards Hans -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG burns my notebook!
Hi Hans, > sam to me. I also have an Acer1524WLMI, but everytime I use apt the cooler > begins to run. Don worry, this seems to be o.k. I suppose, apt is using all > the processing time, and so the AMD64-processor is getting hot. Remember, it > so not a mobile-processor. CPU on my nb runs with 800MHZ (governor: userspace - minimal frequency reachable) and I have an external cooler too. Does your system become unstable when you use apt all the processing time? > Othe thing by the way: I use Nvidia-acceleration, the glx module. When I use > this, I cannot switsch to console. The screen is getting bright. Switching > back to window-manager is o.k. This happens only with glx module. > The nv module works fine. I have nvidia module installed too. In XF86Config-4 I have: load "glx" and this settings for monitor: Section "Modes" Identifier "16:10" # 1280x800 @ 50.00 Hz (GTF) hsync: 41.20 kHz; pclk: 68.56 MHz #Modeline "1280x800" 68.56 1280 1336 1472 1664 800 801 804 824 -HSync +Vsync ModeLine "1280x800" 68.9 1280 1304 1336 1408 800 804 808 816 EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor Generico" UseModes"16:10" #HorizSync 28-50 #VertRefresh43-75 Option "DPMS" EndSection However I can switch to console without problems and I have not bright problems. Can you use IPNCOMM 2220 wireless internal card and winmodem on debian? Giulio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG burns my notebook!
Am Donnerstag, 7. Juli 2005 20:06 schrieb antongiulio05: > Hi, > > this is not a joke:) > Reading posts about GPG-errors for last apt version, I have launched: > > apt-key add keyfile. > > At start, notebook temperature was for thermal 1: 40 C and thermal 2: 47 C > (from 'acpi -V'). Running command above (and so 'gpg' process) my system > becomes unstable (auto key pressing etc.), and temperature is jumped to 55 > C for 1, and 88 C for 2 in one minute. Top command returned 'gpg' cpu-usage > 99%. Is it a debian problem or a notebook strange behavior? I have an acer > 1524wlmi. > > Thanks > Giulio Hi Gulio, sam to me. I also have an Acer1524WLMI, but everytime I use apt the cooler begins to run. Don worry, this seems to be o.k. I suppose, apt is using all the processing time, and so the AMD64-processor is getting hot. Remember, it so not a mobile-processor. Othe thing by the way: I use Nvidia-acceleration, the glx module. When I use this, I cannot switsch to console. The screen is getting bright. Switching back to window-manager is o.k. This happens only with glx module. The nv module works fine. Best regards Hans -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG burns my notebook!
Hi, this is not a joke:) Reading posts about GPG-errors for last apt version, I have launched: apt-key add keyfile. At start, notebook temperature was for thermal 1: 40 C and thermal 2: 47 C (from 'acpi -V'). Running command above (and so 'gpg' process) my system becomes unstable (auto key pressing etc.), and temperature is jumped to 55 C for 1, and 88 C for 2 in one minute. Top command returned 'gpg' cpu-usage 99%. Is it a debian problem or a notebook strange behavior? I have an acer 1524wlmi. Thanks Giulio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG problem for amd64.debian.net ?
Clive Menzies said on Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 04:30:12PM +0100,: > Try installing gnupg first (which will generate the untrusted sources > error but go ahead anyway) and then try again. I use aptitude. As root: > # aptitude install gnupg > # aptitude update I had gnupg, and was geting the same error messages, so installing gnupg is not the correct choice, afaik. But I read the list, and corrected ... g> -- Mahesh T. Pai<<>> http://paivakil.port5.com Buy Free Software -- It gives you freedom! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG problem for amd64.debian.net ?
Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Joerg Jaspert wrote: >> On 10339 March 1977, Harald Dunkel wrote: >> >> >>>>W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release: The following >>>>signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: >>>>NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED >>>>W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems >>>># >>> >>>Anybody out there? >> >> >> Yeah, read the list, was here in 3 or 4 threads already. >> Download the key, add it with apt-key add. >> > > Done. > > But the error message said "to run apt-get update to > correct these problems". Why doesn't this work? > > > Regards > > Harri Please file a bug about that. That error message is wrong. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG problem for amd64.debian.net ?
On (03/07/05 17:21), Harald Dunkel wrote: > Joerg Jaspert wrote: > > On 10339 March 1977, Harald Dunkel wrote: > > > > > >>>W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release: The following > >>>signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: > >>>NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED > >>>W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems > >>># > >> > >>Anybody out there? > > > > > > Yeah, read the list, was here in 3 or 4 threads already. > > Download the key, add it with apt-key add. > > > > Done. > > But the error message said "to run apt-get update to > correct these problems". Why doesn't this work? Try installing gnupg first (which will generate the untrusted sources error but go ahead anyway) and then try again. I use aptitude. As root: # aptitude install gnupg # aptitude update Regards Clive -- www.clivemenzies.co.uk ... ...strategies for business -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG problem for amd64.debian.net ?
Joerg Jaspert wrote: > On 10339 March 1977, Harald Dunkel wrote: > > >>>W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release: The following >>>signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: >>>NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED >>>W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems >>># >> >>Anybody out there? > > > Yeah, read the list, was here in 3 or 4 threads already. > Download the key, add it with apt-key add. > Done. But the error message said "to run apt-get update to correct these problems". Why doesn't this work? Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: GPG problem for amd64.debian.net ?
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 04:13:50PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > > Anybody out there? Maybe you should read my reply? Or any of the others that where on the list about the same subject? Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG problem for amd64.debian.net ?
On 10339 March 1977, Harald Dunkel wrote: >> W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release: The following >> signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: >> NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED >> W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems >> # > Anybody out there? Yeah, read the list, was here in 3 or 4 threads already. Download the key, add it with apt-key add. -- bye Joerg Some NM: Essential packages are required to provide all of their core functionality even when unconfigured, hence they cannot require libc. Libc therefore is not an essential package. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG problem for amd64.debian.net ?
Harald Dunkel wrote: > Hi folks, > > There seems to be some problem with the signatures: > > > # apt-get update > : > : > Get:4 http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release.gpg [189B] > : > : > Fetched 3683kB in 31s (118kB/s) > Reading package lists... Done > W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release: The following > signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: > NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED > W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems > # > Anybody out there? Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: GPG problem for amd64.debian.net ?
Harald Dunkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > There seems to be some problem with the signatures: > [...] > W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release: The following > signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not > available: NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED This has already been discussed at least twice during the last few days. See the threads "verification of packages with gnupg/apt-key" and "GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net sid Release: ... NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5 BBED". Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG problem for amd64.debian.net ?
On Thu, Jun 30, 2005 at 10:17:51PM +0200, Harald Dunkel wrote: > : > Fetched 3683kB in 31s (118kB/s) > Reading package lists... Done > W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release: The following > signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: > NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED > W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems wget http://amd64.debian.net/archive.key apt-key add archive.key Or: gpg --no-default-keyring --keyring /etc/apt/trusted.gpg --recv-key E415B2B4B5F5BBED Or some combinations of gpg and apt-key. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG problem for amd64.debian.net ?
Hi folks, There seems to be some problem with the signatures: # apt-get update : : Get:4 http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release.gpg [189B] : : Fetched 3683kB in 31s (118kB/s) Reading package lists... Done W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net unstable Release: The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5BBED W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems # Regards Harri signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net sid Release: ... NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5 BBED
Thomas Koeppen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > a apt-get gpg-key issue occured in my box after last apt-get upgrade, > I found no similiar reported behaviour in this list. It has just been reported on this list. See the "verification of packages with gnupg/apt-key" thread. > Possible Reason? A new version of apt, which checks signatures, has just been uploaded. > b) > trust key: > gpg --edit-key E415B2B4B5F5BBED Hopefully, you have made sure that the key is really authentic. > But that is not really the official way. Since AMD64 is not official, there probably isn't an official way. Martin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net sid Release: ... NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5 BBED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 10:24:09PM +0200, Thomas Koeppen wrote: > >>thank you, >>that's the same i did manually (got key from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net) and so issue >>was fixed. >>Perhaps there is any explanation, why this "new" key from april is required >>since yesterday and all >>my updates work well since amd64-archive move in may. > > > apt 0.6 was uploaded to unstable yesterday, and it enabled > checking the signatures by default. > > > Kurt > > that's it. thank you. Thomas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBQsMJRtvuK9oZv1geAQK8aBAAoMg3QEwaYQOJr3AyPOcIvbYSDaifae40 75P1QdqVWMcr2uVNn0X5tGHwovRAvTmUwDKJSCyunUPx2MFujc1Vlzh3VHo/qiuy IhohCtOcqJpWH998/qnrfldE2NB+JCj+aWdy2CkJ+1sSnDUMZABYjxb2qwVsSupa Mmh+FKLSaI7JVnsHXxrlLgGt8NWwxFuuDXsFbYqHRhzsrM7DFpsjELWqlU0PpGHL TzdplUnknemdD8nIbKwcCzIIuvQ4N855j9ujPQ+OqPlM0YSjWtHMOgC8/QsR3g95 JMkLhANSAVm1KEs3OlFBi7XgsX3sgOxDQQlTqOYhJsnqSzfI3FiDXfSVvoz4X1a2 d3AGMvYVqZK69C4BJ5wUmw0WjnmGJNugZ8fpAAMFmJQL+kx8J2UmnFAH7ck2uMzb lLzVFOT5UXdCXkeWeWvynMab3UebvfXSxo68oy42kPymIZ57QO/p9Mn587mp5YMF +7M3MULRke567n9wZYAz4rx9oYHVigGHc+d/5HQUpm/Q2sNtOGVVcM4jO0fG0zsO uBAz60VIhYs5MUWBG8kXG1jkDY6uaN/sqa1DPNRCAKy3jnivu7xBP7UWgLuFeOIP MhB3WaiF4z26TwARIeyKxQmKyhASgtzb4thdM7Qc4V8LoIxcRR5RvFoe3VUD525e LzYGggljMt0= =/26s -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net sid Release: ... NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5 BBED
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 10:24:09PM +0200, Thomas Koeppen wrote: > thank you, > that's the same i did manually (got key from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net) and so issue > was fixed. > Perhaps there is any explanation, why this "new" key from april is required > since yesterday and all > my updates work well since amd64-archive move in may. apt 0.6 was uploaded to unstable yesterday, and it enabled checking the signatures by default. Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net sid Release: ... NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5 BBED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:05:06PM +0200, Thomas Koeppen wrote: > >>a apt-get gpg-key issue occured in my box after last apt-get upgrade, >>I found no similiar reported behaviour in this list. >>(i've been updating from amd64.debian.net since archive move many times >>without problems last weeks). > > > Get amd64.debian.net/archive.key and use apt-key add archive.key > > > Kurt > > thank you, that's the same i did manually (got key from wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net) and so issue was fixed. Perhaps there is any explanation, why this "new" key from april is required since yesterday and all my updates work well since amd64-archive move in may. Thomas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBQsMDadvuK9oZv1geAQJ5hg//VZn5+WmXv5XoyvhMLbWobzUsNOHdkkzh I+1gy1bZfy8i0IoRaBROS5DXUMe40wEZbdlAWjgrBFKTpWy7aZeEu28bRuIy1AI4 u7PBIsFVdvDC53Y5jCE1uGJFxGmLZSd0mDydtH2B0Q6uhNFGinT+KhoF4BzkVYqO HkvuDuk1O7lR9Qf5CqnfN+xe42Pv+Z+BKMsA4UdM/B7RzaJr49QtMXZw6Ti6wsrM ezprL0wKDPdSw7AkDCvGB0ynztX4sG1EluDCKEM4tRmqQPj4ilJ8f80VHKe0NKew yela0LaJbKTOWLIJhXwXhI6ymXjJ4ok9diyIGZMfaJrSu/mM7cHOg6vX3S4E8eRe drZvyrzrAZENPbj4jwVswnDWCRs5zFrrFeaqFe327ibAgbC6/oGVW4JDDfKrmt3Q FciyfpysHh5yxkmi2VGHE8rdzUj28zoZgfmLq0zi9GrsPLbQENJCtm7LmdJq1zmL ld42rqVkx9Refj89HbsqhiaC+5bKru0615yIylmc4q+ZJI9cT02/Kxw13UjFqQPr bf0IH5QKmcX7N0WMU2gqN3vkrab9zihxIHnXJDdzO/apVoyeBVh8elak78fBRwlQ uRh1Jhvh3x3l+GfJsSo7ewrdDZZoVFThkLUgcGX+TPAs9ZtSMkEMbrAz0uxJbm8v VMetddLor9c= =9D4I -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net sid Release: ... NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5 BBED
On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:05:06PM +0200, Thomas Koeppen wrote: > > a apt-get gpg-key issue occured in my box after last apt-get upgrade, > I found no similiar reported behaviour in this list. > (i've been updating from amd64.debian.net since archive move many times > without problems last weeks). Get amd64.debian.net/archive.key and use apt-key add archive.key Kurt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net sid Release: ... NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5 BBED
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 sorry, my last post not encrypted now, see below. Thomas - Original Message Subject: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net sid Release: ... NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5 BBED Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 13:55:29 -0500 (CDT) Resent-From: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:55:20 +0200 From: Thomas Koeppen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-amd64@lists.debian.org Hi all, a apt-get gpg-key issue occured in my box after last apt-get upgrade, I found no similiar reported behaviour in this list. (i've been updating from amd64.debian.net since archive move many times without problems last weeks). Issue: apt-get update Get:1 http://amd64.debian.net sid Release.gpg [189B] Get:2 http://amd64.debian.net sid Release [4800B] Ign http://amd64.debian.net sid Release Get:3 http://amd64.debian.net sid/main Packages [2622kB] Fetched 2627kB in 9s (266kB/s) Reading package lists... Done W: GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net sid Release: The following signatures coul dn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5 BBED W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems Possible Reason? wrong distributed trusted.gpg with my last apt-get upgrade ??? i read that the above key is the new key since archive move, i verified it. ls -la /etc/apt/trusted* - -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2717 Jun 29 20:24 /etc/apt/trusted.gpg - -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1303 Jun 29 20:37 /etc/apt/trusted.gpg.orig - -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2717 Jun 29 20:24 /etc/apt/trusted.gpg~ /etc/apt/sources.list # amd64 moved 20050505 deb http://amd64.debian.net/debian/ sid main my workaround: a) get new key gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net --recv-keys E415B2B4B5F5BBED gpg: requesting key B5F5BBED from hkp server wwwkeys.eu.pgp.net gpg: key B5F5BBED: public key "Debian AMD64 Archive Key " imported gpg: no ultimately trusted keys found gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: imported: 1 b) trust key: gpg --edit-key E415B2B4B5F5BBED c) gpg --armor --export E415B2B4B5F5BBED | apt-key add - OK d) apt-get update Get:1 http://amd64.debian.net sid Release.gpg [189B] Hit http://amd64.debian.net sid Release Hit http://amd64.debian.net sid/main Packages Fetched 189B in 0s (657B/s) Reading package lists... Done ... now everything's fine as expected. But that is not really the official way. Anybody knows what happen, something in the archive? regards, Thomas -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iQIVAwUBQsLw4dvuK9oZv1geAQKJ+Q//aFRy7OQADCyE1H7GrhvSVkQmU0Usj59z kxwTTlyQjKRhDHQRCzxjJW6F8LEddAvtMa+fZjdWrIEVFpvPTaXXPhpwQ+ihPHlK czZXDPoAfcrxxrfxZDqCKQXhP/p6hgocuVE0eH7Yp1LANs91pD70XqnAshm7/XQl hRRYSaEaIFdnznL5lbb6evQ3lLvrit0UQE9eElfO9n4CNq0SXTjgpAylZdzmt/7N MPazEsDcBeZybqAOAwtpaNM7fmngALn3xeA1pM2t6yN3Vql/hGx2Uw7jPBFgfCfG wKuTZtzHxGrOm0DKgQ4gJdgXctlt5CYQlkUP+6oKDjPcDITCCp/StxkT4+NED2Js bOpVznGZ/3skgx4XtrdNMaGdmuX+fFnUobwUkpgXKuixvFN3vRsKlvB+s3Q7dZYr hFpRbrIRdJ2EHa0HqgqRxnQHW2TE2OmoQtvbNj0wozjPOXnRRL38xckR40qftZhU 4laqGbAQ1Dagw9uaT3HqBp2Kts4qlKc/Z1Pqjr34p88NQzKpPRmgutQnhtcuUtZZ V6m9WK0UhN9ECEwC+8gwAZHkpuqZdbb5ITIK272woVnGEhKY+yj+lHFu56xchnC5 ZMeXAOygZqeJfEVJ+CF18E2y/dJCggKXIRIFTpRzV9G/042Obb/sj5oVLXOgwPNq Y18i4Jamr84= =TZV7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG error: http://amd64.debian.net sid Release: ... NO_PUBKEY E415B2B4B5F5 BBED
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- Charset: ISO-8859-1 Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org hQIOA7elC0E0/G/lEAgAlbutJj9sUTBAaEC6ca+k68OltqNhVCzA0uiCAaRQIMZ0 TQZy1T0P0/MgC2VoY0bEA8pJTgeLADT65QISH0ajrptPVRU2P4zm3fyfC0+rJQm3 EEpe1ljZ1Mf1tjZ2JnetmcokhQMc7I4w6s+PXDUZIAAqiUXeSYEfAhXK3ZeNZMLF CwImP2asWHcvE0L5ctgvm46UqCmWdlVRBf11y72afrlj2uJOIJgYUmJ2DbK+3UzG dmPrHsEy3odnei19IxV3bH7iuluUmpfLEPTWqK4hfXqa+Vuy8p4RKbFeVg9evYDX wFEHBeST58MFBtrl0febIn1dXeMztXyY6+CzyEQPCQf/UsRQnZstLnObw9+QMt72 e9m8oRQaH/S7RWbX06qPs4N0ndFYBZkXITKu0qpVbf/pODI5tfN61424Zas4w7FJ a/gfxw1rgYps2EcJZsElelvjkoIjkhjDjyZNxIGkOXZ8paJWiAiCbLMLx3eCplga CXL2oKKt+elM7ePWoN1uDMILW3BDgAZpsLPT0Z8vDEc/gLD63dgTi6oBS4v3brbL H8DKRKpXUgTzcyqHMUzSGNFL7cStVXEvokMZ1SFOrVrn5YBd7zIfl8SbU9CCo2X+ FKaD/ZzJpRs0v27LRz7YAzdh4DftyRtaJpaJv6AgOalY5OXuSY3I4I8BDePuLbRA NYUCDAMQOQXkoqYACwEP/ApFUqST2k/A9mbZPHOpoESNg3Dls+3o8XznT/l8hDHY yRzTb6/tLruJd6SJ+FD38uGZRgm7p3Dj24uuJ9EAqm/ROHhzB12vssKsXC+QwQX7 jHRctIz7RZu6fpcO7fB77fJ/x9LV/uH5v1h9jSgOrrf9PmZxeluNrgvWBQw78JY/ Voo/MEK+ny0citzdzBCtcz0NPBaQ4sDozY7BB7RZhr1wozLT9kPg/dFgDO3faqr1 ZQQlNRUP/AaYujIaP2P3B4LHReAqZlGkl5Q1JM8PK2/3qc6dscLpmn+A6cmmmrk1 PuGvBYNwd7mejigjzC/tB0gzOCXdJeKVAx7QljGF3AdvyR96Ub5O2moXal9BN2QA nrVhPMTQOlgt3bTo18HSdawdy0TW9eDUF+wE3qeH327pIa9vfrJciZQJcWsGOdH/ m6Uy+x5FGMgEZt7WGNFFruW4mkXiWiz95hdw+OrY+f6Ym64Nt3kprezOKfhXy2rF 0dn8G2hk22fa2CpOagm/pzsk1LVc6sYdxSBr9Pq3SsZJTBsOGEZbf7FT3Kr19rOE grxEzLgo3aQ6k+1zITMXeAOd+uGufWJizrp3rzD8Achz/8k9D9j98N1Q/pMqB/Ep Sf0guuNrGMXZIyhmmgMM3+ItjT++/BcmnFSk33AWOgmwvSHZr5XJnTCKcA+pvSk6 0uoBk07xvDojHy8BReEVauhiu2f5PJDFkPwkjUDPyJHF6giiUirP9mYPnPgBwsGZ oDmaalLV8qulkhXofU+7YdOftbhOqiXdngO97YIpBQJT0soze82GOZt2wM+nRsvj AS4nHeFUAbpWXY/+kGGBDHVWzZV/o0sj8acu1bX1uKsmwhAMM9KEWsT81ptiUk6d G03Cc2mFazn2CIgw+8dZSBzZarOzp2RLUvTw0KXIBFNd4cvs2070q7ey/530+eVA /LmQm6YlNqullzYimzc48tyz75f5dk8siVmOztZfSVWP36kyRUfen5pCwDThPZQp GH3vFhrfTPx0Yj+eYGWpArVB4SpUzI+tiL1uMFTAyAs6lI8op7ph1cKl+ASiq+Ko VaZHNSjwuzd2ff35fTv7uD3612qcRbZtySIHzg/bxYnqxcfLU/lmMr6vKPhUE4Ck ndIfnQbl9mtJoDTmJ/K6hMz1QLVey6l6OgCmlJmGsSxJknixEcw/sOUKz8KcYhYM woxjrDTsL52WPfDdQmGPuV+FJHd71okR44EX9pxRiIV0YBoeNyfrsbjGwsCJFHtS lDqvSzPL60vpVfmRd0t50skJunKLsaSlKVxT9/bHDJP9lN5b8qtcPgh43HBVPaul +6SfFyP7Z9Lxmg55inEHFsFnJVLIP/EnrTOaeT+sZzE8LFeoivBE4lazcd5Yie11 CVm7T0uOIqUGFZRC+TflSKlngI1Dw1/eB4gMrzOyTDb5HT+aeo4nRZt0rmBy9zCE Gd/ybdt7mj/bwJRujQV82sq5VSA8DNetw+AFcQXHgAcP86NQxCHYq/yRinHwdX+c KDbPrrj/Zzk0//he0NwhJjOeT9HLtkn1Woz4lGyhSPHzJq4Ze5fUoLm3QUyPlnjR ZJ3JTKXbnL+vvcBSBE4qw8xki4yxcVZ8tlH7hKiaz91if82BCiOiBhN2bs3Td4Dn Sc/9Uao49jp0iKke+hIjbDTXFUZm73QG2GmrE2Sx4L4Jx7ttpR8gf+MYGr20V/YB WhtqU8bngY9kIDtBUyvMdI1Bcdaf+uFqZa35FSZZVlGcziimDgz0npSZxdKuGH/C KKi/e7N+v1Kog6NtQ+1Isi1ElfQLtGxn1/sK+9X0NwtNZr0DJj/VEcEiVGS1bi88 K+XFmXAbFbhsZfmUGzWPS7ZGdomeKlTt/4c7MgE8UP3AhfF5DvIuDcvpJPmcel4e 7/iAMdHy+LRK3F4s+2odWKiwt8d9bnc5/4YqFp4M4PCR04ce6pinet9UjKcYNWwD tjr4PsBWpIV2IzTW7BZzuESMJkLsS2tZzmZSr3Jfg0TY3doB9ICFo3qh/ztydYbM K0Ids+r4IT7gLy/YmeLea+uh6TRJZ1EcVb2Q5WVSs/R40nOxyAtYSJaV6A+7EO5Y 2IDhSjqvjuRtwy+MlVkGmHKqbB9CgWdgZ9dAMVVVK7J/nRSymia08QBPoVbBY//9 ECeSpDzjJCHZyIxbsnfAHDkfraZs1Mj4t9HfXwS9bSWwUxlmQX7sm/1LdJmpSxIl +ey73ahd0Ta5EYz90bNIug/E8QPFaR6K3ASJogcwqnLavNy4mPY3TdgLhTHTwL8c cr07Vd/CkhERfr4yyKYWfRME6CVdoVD4tPlcloVndtH+NNRuYQDiIfrSxH63NmWT B9hTzPQIvwfM6cnBwwi2N2pmMH8GYC/izk6kPKSpGt2w0uUGc4b3sMyhb1bvWdlW 7qlbxHOQiRrGZrt9U3XUBogeMEJd8alI0pwQvAN1sF1nXVHwCkK6M0j7gKt0EmMc x2jGjVcAjfY54VDtl0tEO0Uvq6YKx7tIkoMNLQYQVrdkzprRH2w1PaxMBsMM4aBJ HPIItS01cFgHIAfTD6qCByAWNmDNOHcrURXkAkotJOndE7eNX1jTAokKrvpO2Txf Nnr9ag/Ae5UH7iYMme5cF0e8RZguhNt3lLZQ2FKJIHGC6Uibb45PgbTqJsn+d6xs Rlv4OGMGXjO5b6HjbvjWNK6S5iMfo52btXELgL4sb+p3GyukKS3rtTybXQ1yLSVg sz48qW2aOLttwrwXuuo7lEBQQJTsFc+qfINdW7YF2OtZLspOcC2Fzkk+VezlM0fw ruW0XU6OMfRcb/6YbylpJsc82TvHyfPAKUwgtbhIGqD2ESWL3Kfnmkg8SoGm8MNw hdmMI7kCgpAS+r+2uCdnp4GGP831hj+9oxwqTeW1rEoyGq1E+TIxyu/8J4MxzESu RhXoBqce9/BWBsYGVeL2b0r65hWxJyu6s6thFz0= =Lanw -END PGP MESSAGE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gpg
I seen that the amd64 ist also at the normal ftp-server. There i found the key. The key I describe in the last mail was a false one. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: gpg
Markus Boas wrote: An which keyserver is the gpg key of the amd64 mirror. I search für the pub 1024D/B5F5BBED 2005-04-24 Key fingerprint = C20C A1D9 499D ECBB D8BD ACF9 E415 B2B4 B5F5 BBED uid Debian AMD64 Archive Key sub 2048g/34FC6FE5 2005-04-24 but I found him not. thx Ryen Googling for Debian AMD64 Archive Key reveals http://bytekeeper.as28747.net/debian-amd64/archive.key (and other mirrors). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
gpg
An which keyserver is the gpg key of the amd64 mirror. I search für the pub 1024D/B5F5BBED 2005-04-24 Key fingerprint = C20C A1D9 499D ECBB D8BD ACF9 E415 B2B4 B5F5 BBED uid Debian AMD64 Archive Key sub 2048g/34FC6FE5 2005-04-24 but I found him not. thx Ryen
Re: GPG error mirroring the archive
Peter Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, my mirror of the amd64 archive recently broke becaues of the > following errors: > > gpg: Signature made Thu Jan 20 17:40:22 2005 EST using DSA key ID 2FE487B0 > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found > gpg: Signature made Thu Jan 20 17:40:22 2005 EST using DSA key ID 2FE487B0 > gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found > Failed to download some Package, Sources, Contents or release files! > > I've gotten around this by using the option --ignore-release-gpg but > I'm wondering how to properly get this key. I installed > debian-keychain, but am still seeing the error. > > And sometime soon now (yeah, I've said this before...) I'll open up my > mirror for Internet 2 users, who should be able to max out their I2 > connections getting from me. > > -Peter > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] Extract it from http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64/wanna-build/pubring.gpg MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG error mirroring the archive
Hi, my mirror of the amd64 archive recently broke becaues of the following errors: gpg: Signature made Thu Jan 20 17:40:22 2005 EST using DSA key ID 2FE487B0 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found gpg: Signature made Thu Jan 20 17:40:22 2005 EST using DSA key ID 2FE487B0 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found Failed to download some Package, Sources, Contents or release files! I've gotten around this by using the option --ignore-release-gpg but I'm wondering how to properly get this key. I installed debian-keychain, but am still seeing the error. And sometime soon now (yeah, I've said this before...) I'll open up my mirror for Internet 2 users, who should be able to max out their I2 connections getting from me. -Peter -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
