Re: ia32-libs broken?
Goswin von Brederlow wrote: Directly to the author of the patch. Read changelog for email. MfG Goswin Thanks Goswin, I ended up doing that a short while back. Although, I've yet to hear back yet. Nathan Code is poetry. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ia32-libs broken?
Nathan Dragun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Nathan Dragun wrote: > >> I had issues with pre 1.4 build (non-gcc4) in which the lddlibc4 >> command couldn't be found. Fortunately in the 1.4 build it worked >> great! But now suddenly the 1.4.0.0.1.gcc4 build fails to find the >> command again. >> >> I waited a while before submitting this assuming it would draw >> attention to itself, but it hasn't. If I'm not mistaken the >> libraries were movied to the ia32-libs-extra package? I grabbed >> that as well, didn't seem to make a difference in regards to >> lddlibc4. > > > Still havn't heard word on this, anyone else having an issue with > this? If necessary, where/how should I file a bug report? > > Thanks. > Nathan > > Code is poetry. Directly to the author of the patch. Read changelog for email. MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ia32-libs broken?
Nathan Dragun wrote: I had issues with pre 1.4 build (non-gcc4) in which the lddlibc4 command couldn't be found. Fortunately in the 1.4 build it worked great! But now suddenly the 1.4.0.0.1.gcc4 build fails to find the command again. I waited a while before submitting this assuming it would draw attention to itself, but it hasn't. If I'm not mistaken the libraries were movied to the ia32-libs-extra package? I grabbed that as well, didn't seem to make a difference in regards to lddlibc4. Still havn't heard word on this, anyone else having an issue with this? If necessary, where/how should I file a bug report? Thanks. Nathan Code is poetry. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ia32-libs broken?
I had issues with pre 1.4 build (non-gcc4) in which the lddlibc4 command couldn't be found. Fortunately in the 1.4 build it worked great! But now suddenly the 1.4.0.0.1.gcc4 build fails to find the command again. I waited a while before submitting this assuming it would draw attention to itself, but it hasn't. If I'm not mistaken the libraries were movied to the ia32-libs-extra package? I grabbed that as well, didn't seem to make a difference in regards to lddlibc4. Nathan Code is poetry. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: ia32-libs: Broken on amd64 / Please revert to working and tested version 0.7
There is a bug in the current ia32-libs: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=306512 -John On 5/3/05, Andreas Jochens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Package: ia32-libs > Version: 1.3 > Severity: important > > The current version 1.3 of ia32-libs is broken on amd64. It is not > possible to build anything with 'gcc-3.4 -m32' anymore as it used > to be with the old version 0.7. > > Now you get the following error when trying to compile > with 'gcc-3.4 -m32': > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s_32 > collect2: ld returned 1 exit status > > This is not the only problem. The libc.so file is wrong and > the installation directories for some other important files > have been changed, so that they cannot be found anymore during > standard compilations. > > Please revert to the old version 0.7 which worked fine. > > Maybe a few extra libraries could be added to support openoffice.org > and other 32 bit programs, but please do not change anything else. > > The whole amd64 toolchain depends on ia32-libs via libgcc1 from gcc-3.4, > because gcc-3.4 Build-Depends on ia32-libs-dev. > > IMHO it is not the right time to experiment with a vital part of the > amd64 toolchain now. After sarge, things maybe different, of course, > and some cleanup along the lines of the newer versions > may certainly be useful then. > > We should really try to get a working and tested toolchain into sarge > and discuss any directory changes later. > > Regards > Andreas Jochens > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
ia32-libs: Broken on amd64 / Please revert to working and tested version 0.7
Package: ia32-libs Version: 1.3 Severity: important The current version 1.3 of ia32-libs is broken on amd64. It is not possible to build anything with 'gcc-3.4 -m32' anymore as it used to be with the old version 0.7. Now you get the following error when trying to compile with 'gcc-3.4 -m32': /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lgcc_s_32 collect2: ld returned 1 exit status This is not the only problem. The libc.so file is wrong and the installation directories for some other important files have been changed, so that they cannot be found anymore during standard compilations. Please revert to the old version 0.7 which worked fine. Maybe a few extra libraries could be added to support openoffice.org and other 32 bit programs, but please do not change anything else. The whole amd64 toolchain depends on ia32-libs via libgcc1 from gcc-3.4, because gcc-3.4 Build-Depends on ia32-libs-dev. IMHO it is not the right time to experiment with a vital part of the amd64 toolchain now. After sarge, things maybe different, of course, and some cleanup along the lines of the newer versions may certainly be useful then. We should really try to get a working and tested toolchain into sarge and discuss any directory changes later. Regards Andreas Jochens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
