Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
Hi: #apt-get --purge remove libsc8 libsc-doc libsc-dev libsc7 completed by synaptic removal of libsc-doc (which was not removed by the above command) followed by #apt-get update #apt-get upgrade now only reports errors exim4-daemon-ligth at exim4 bsd-mailx acpid mailx which (as from Floria Kulzer) seems be bug #477258, which has been fixed in Sid since April 25, exim4 version 4.69-3. The bug report describes how to repair the init script yourself. (So far the fix did not propagate to Lenny because there have been further updates in Sid, restarting the 10 days waiting period.) I do nothing more if, as I expect, "apt-get upgrade" will do the repair in due time. Why these errors did not show up of amd64 when the system complained about libsc7 is something I do not understand. I got the impression that the libsc7 deb package is faulty. Thanks francesco --- On Tue, 5/6/08, Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems > To: "Francesco Pietra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "C. Ahlstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "debian64" > , "debian-users" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2008, 11:37 AM > On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 11:33:54AM -0700, Francesco Pietra > wrote: > > I have tried with synaptic. > > > > (1) marking libsc8 (which was installed) for removal > and unmarking libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb (which was not > installed), a dist-upgrade is carried out, ending in the > same error: > > > > E: /var/cache/apt/archives/libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb > trying to overwrite > > '/usr/lib/libSCstates.so.7.1.0' whi is also in > package libsc8. > > > > Now marking libsc-dev for removal returns errors: > > > > E: exim-daemon-light subprocesses post-installation > script returned error exit status 1 > > > > E: exim4 depend problem > > > > E: bds-mailx dep problem > > > > E: acpid subprocess post-install error 1 > > > > E: mailx dep problem > > > > I.e, it drops now in the same errors that I had > reported for i386. "Florian Kulzer" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kindly advided me > that it is a bug fixed in unstable, not yet passed to > lenny. > > Try doing: > > dpkg --purge libsc8 > apt-get install libsc7 > > If the dpkg fails, then something must still be using it. > > -- > Len Sorensen > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
On 6 May, 2008, at 19:04, Francesco Pietra wrote: ___ Well, from present information is it possible to indicate how to remove those files/scripts that generate the error messages, and let lenny do upgrading correctly? Someone has kindly suggested to carry out again a dist-upgrade, though I suspect that with my system the final outcome would be the same. Thanks francesco pietra If you don't need the package anyway, why don't you simply remove it/ them? #> apt-get remove libsc8 libsc7 libsc-dev Might do the trick. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 11:33:54AM -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote: > I have tried with synaptic. > > (1) marking libsc8 (which was installed) for removal and unmarking > libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb (which was not installed), a dist-upgrade is carried > out, ending in the same error: > > E: /var/cache/apt/archives/libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb trying to overwrite > '/usr/lib/libSCstates.so.7.1.0' whi is also in package libsc8. > > Now marking libsc-dev for removal returns errors: > > E: exim-daemon-light subprocesses post-installation script returned error > exit status 1 > > E: exim4 depend problem > > E: bds-mailx dep problem > > E: acpid subprocess post-install error 1 > > E: mailx dep problem > > I.e, it drops now in the same errors that I had reported for i386. "Florian > Kulzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kindly advided me that it is a bug fixed in > unstable, not yet passed to lenny. Try doing: dpkg --purge libsc8 apt-get install libsc7 If the dpkg fails, then something must still be using it. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
I have tried with synaptic. (1) marking libsc8 (which was installed) for removal and unmarking libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb (which was not installed), a dist-upgrade is carried out, ending in the same error: E: /var/cache/apt/archives/libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libSCstates.so.7.1.0' whi is also in package libsc8. Now marking libsc-dev for removal returns errors: E: exim-daemon-light subprocesses post-installation script returned error exit status 1 E: exim4 depend problem E: bds-mailx dep problem E: acpid subprocess post-install error 1 E: mailx dep problem I.e, it drops now in the same errors that I had reported for i386. "Florian Kulzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> kindly advided me that it is a bug fixed in unstable, not yet passed to lenny. francesco --- On Tue, 5/6/08, Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems > To: "Francesco Pietra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "C. Ahlstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "debian64" > > Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2008, 9:32 AM > On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 08:53:27AM -0700, Francesco Pietra > wrote: > > Hi: > > Sorry for this lengthy dealing with libsc7/libsc8, > though I would like to clean the system, i.e. not to have > these issues raised at each "apt-get upgrade". > Actually, now "apt-get upgrade" only results in: > > > > Reading package list ...Done > > Building dependency tree ... Done > > You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to > correct. > > Packages with unmet dependencies: > > libsc-dev: Depends: libsc7 (= 2.3.1-3) but it is not > installed. > > > > It seems to be unable to upgrading, unless there is > nothing else. > > > > I think that I don't need either libsc7 or libsc8. > Both come from "The Scientific Computing Toolkit" > (Sandja Lab, mpqc) an extraordinary quantum mechanical > package that I used successfully, but one that > unfortunately is not being developed toward organic > chemical applications. Therefore I don't use it any > more. There is a relationship with "ghemical" > that I don't use either on this amd64 system (I barely > run 'startx' on rare occasions) > > > > I did some search: > > > > apt-cache rdepends libsc7 > > ENTER > > Reverse Depends: > > mpqc-support > > mpqc > > libsc-dev > > libghemical3gf > > > > apt-cache rdepends libsc8 > > ENTER > > Reverse Depends: > > [nothing reported] > > > > If I carry out the same commands with i386 (where mpqc > is still installed), for libsc7 there is one line more > "libghemical0c2a", while for libsc8 the answer is > "no package found". > > Well mpqc seems to use it too. It seems odd that libsc8 > conflicts with > libsc7, in fact I would think that is a bug and should be > reported as > such. If nothing else it should conflict if it can't > be installed at > the same time. > > -- > Len Sorensen > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 10:04:06AM -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote: > Hi: > I found an e-mail from you dated Aug 22 2006 (and about amd64) that may > clarify: > > > Aimed at reinstalling mpqc 2.3.1 from scratch, I also wanted to reinstall > > required tk8.4 and libsc8 (although "apt-cache show" shows both installed > > and > > existing from The Scientific Computing Toolkit). No problem on reinstalling > > tk8.4, while: > > > > #apt-get --reinstall install libsc8 > > > > reported "not reinstalled because it cannot be downloaded" > > > > Is that libsc8 has first to be removed? Not attempted. > > > > All that because mpqc is unable to complete complex computations very > > similar > > to those that it was able to complete successfully before. I want to be > > sure > > that there is no corruption (which is not so easy - or speedy - to verify > > otherwise: with simple, speedy computations no problem arises). > > Usually that message means you have it installed, but it is no longer > available for download from one of the sites in your sources.list > (assuming it ever was). > > Since it actually appears to be one of the packages that comes from > mpqc, you should download it from where you downloaded the mpqc packages > from. Well perhaps that is where you got it from then. http://tinyplanet.ca/~lsorense/mpqc/ currently has: # libint-dev_1.1.2-0_amd64.deb # libint-dev_1.1.2-0_i386.deb # libint1_1.1.2-0_amd64.deb # libint1_1.1.2-0_i386.deb # libint_1.1.2-0.diff.gz # libint_1.1.2-0.dsc # libint_1.1.2.orig.tar.gz # libsc-dev_2.3.1-0.2_amd64.deb # libsc-dev_2.3.1-0.2_i386.deb # libsc-doc_2.3.1-0.2_all.deb # libsc8_2.3.1-0.2_amd64.deb # libsc8_2.3.1-0.2_i386.deb # mpqc-support_2.3.1-0.2_amd64.deb # mpqc-support_2.3.1-0.2_i386.deb # mpqc_2.3.1-0.2_amd64.deb # mpqc_2.3.1-0.2_i386.deb # mpqc_2.3.1.orig.tar.gz I seem to recall one of the updates I did there required the newer version. Probably the libint stuff. I suspect mpqc 2.3.1 in Debian does not have libint support. I can update the version numbers to -3.1 to make things easier to use if libint support is still desired. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
Hi: I found an e-mail from you dated Aug 22 2006 (and about amd64) that may clarify: > Aimed at reinstalling mpqc 2.3.1 from scratch, I also wanted to reinstall > required tk8.4 and libsc8 (although "apt-cache show" shows both installed and > existing from The Scientific Computing Toolkit). No problem on reinstalling > tk8.4, while: > > #apt-get --reinstall install libsc8 > > reported "not reinstalled because it cannot be downloaded" > > Is that libsc8 has first to be removed? Not attempted. > > All that because mpqc is unable to complete complex computations very similar > to those that it was able to complete successfully before. I want to be sure > that there is no corruption (which is not so easy - or speedy - to verify > otherwise: with simple, speedy computations no problem arises). Usually that message means you have it installed, but it is no longer available for download from one of the sites in your sources.list (assuming it ever was). Since it actually appears to be one of the packages that comes from mpqc, you should download it from where you downloaded the mpqc packages from. -- Len Sorensen ___ Well, from present information is it possible to indicate how to remove those files/scripts that generate the error messages, and let lenny do upgrading correctly? Someone has kindly suggested to carry out again a dist-upgrade, though I suspect that with my system the final outcome would be the same. Thanks francesco pietra --- On Tue, 5/6/08, Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems > To: "Francesco Pietra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "C. Ahlstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "debian64" > > Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2008, 9:32 AM > On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 08:53:27AM -0700, Francesco Pietra > wrote: > > Hi: > > Sorry for this lengthy dealing with libsc7/libsc8, > though I would like to clean the system, i.e. not to have > these issues raised at each "apt-get upgrade". > Actually, now "apt-get upgrade" only results in: > > > > Reading package list ...Done > > Building dependency tree ... Done > > You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to > correct. > > Packages with unmet dependencies: > > libsc-dev: Depends: libsc7 (= 2.3.1-3) but it is not > installed. > > > > It seems to be unable to upgrading, unless there is > nothing else. > > > > I think that I don't need either libsc7 or libsc8. > Both come from "The Scientific Computing Toolkit" > (Sandja Lab, mpqc) an extraordinary quantum mechanical > package that I used successfully, but one that > unfortunately is not being developed toward organic > chemical applications. Therefore I don't use it any > more. There is a relationship with "ghemical" > that I don't use either on this amd64 system (I barely > run 'startx' on rare occasions) > > > > I did some search: > > > > apt-cache rdepends libsc7 > > ENTER > > Reverse Depends: > > mpqc-support > > mpqc > > libsc-dev > > libghemical3gf > > > > apt-cache rdepends libsc8 > > ENTER > > Reverse Depends: > > [nothing reported] > > > > If I carry out the same commands with i386 (where mpqc > is still installed), for libsc7 there is one line more > "libghemical0c2a", while for libsc8 the answer is > "no package found". > > Well mpqc seems to use it too. It seems odd that libsc8 > conflicts with > libsc7, in fact I would think that is a bug and should be > reported as > such. If nothing else it should conflict if it can't > be installed at > the same time. > > -- > Len Sorensen > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Be a better friend, newshound, and know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 08:53:27AM -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote: > Hi: > Sorry for this lengthy dealing with libsc7/libsc8, though I would like to > clean the system, i.e. not to have these issues raised at each "apt-get > upgrade". Actually, now "apt-get upgrade" only results in: > > Reading package list ...Done > Building dependency tree ... Done > You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct. > Packages with unmet dependencies: > libsc-dev: Depends: libsc7 (= 2.3.1-3) but it is not installed. > > It seems to be unable to upgrading, unless there is nothing else. > > I think that I don't need either libsc7 or libsc8. Both come from "The > Scientific Computing Toolkit" (Sandja Lab, mpqc) an extraordinary quantum > mechanical package that I used successfully, but one that unfortunately is > not being developed toward organic chemical applications. Therefore I don't > use it any more. There is a relationship with "ghemical" that I don't use > either on this amd64 system (I barely run 'startx' on rare occasions) > > I did some search: > > apt-cache rdepends libsc7 > ENTER > Reverse Depends: > mpqc-support > mpqc > libsc-dev > libghemical3gf > > apt-cache rdepends libsc8 > ENTER > Reverse Depends: > [nothing reported] > > If I carry out the same commands with i386 (where mpqc is still installed), > for libsc7 there is one line more "libghemical0c2a", while for libsc8 the > answer is "no package found". Well mpqc seems to use it too. It seems odd that libsc8 conflicts with libsc7, in fact I would think that is a bug and should be reported as such. If nothing else it should conflict if it can't be installed at the same time. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
i thinc you must make apt-get dist-upgrade
2008/5/6 Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi:
> Sorry for this lengthy dealing with libsc7/libsc8, though I would like to
> clean the system, i.e. not to have these issues raised at each "apt-get
> upgrade". Actually, now "apt-get upgrade" only results in:
>
> Reading package list ...Done
> Building dependency tree ... Done
> You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct.
> Packages with unmet dependencies:
> libsc-dev: Depends: libsc7 (= 2.3.1-3) but it is not installed.
>
> It seems to be unable to upgrading, unless there is nothing else.
>
> I think that I don't need either libsc7 or libsc8. Both come from "The
> Scientific Computing Toolkit" (Sandja Lab, mpqc) an extraordinary quantum
> mechanical package that I used successfully, but one that unfortunately is
> not being developed toward organic chemical applications. Therefore I don't
> use it any more. There is a relationship with "ghemical" that I don't use
> either on this amd64 system (I barely run 'startx' on rare occasions)
>
> I did some search:
>
> apt-cache rdepends libsc7
> ENTER
> Reverse Depends:
> mpqc-support
> mpqc
> libsc-dev
> libghemical3gf
>
> apt-cache rdepends libsc8
> ENTER
> Reverse Depends:
> [nothing reported]
>
> If I carry out the same commands with i386 (where mpqc is still installed),
> for libsc7 there is one line more "libghemical0c2a", while for libsc8 the
> answer is "no package found".
>
>
> Thanks
> francesco pietra
>
>
>
> --- On Tue, 5/6/08, Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > From: Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
> > To: "Francesco Pietra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "C. Ahlstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "debian64"
>
> > Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2008, 7:32 AM
>
>
> > On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:57:43AM -0700, Francesco Pietra
> > wrote:
> > > Hi:
> > > Following
> > >
> > > # apt-get clean
> > >
> > > then
> > >
> > > #apt-get update
> > > #apt-get upgrade
> > >
> > > the system was no more complaining about libsc7,
> > though it was about libsc7-dev (unmet dependencies as it
> > depends from libsc7). Suggested "apt-get -f
> > install", which I did; it asked permission to install
> > libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.
> > > I accepted:
> > >
> > > Get:1 http://ftp.debian.org lenny/main libsc7 2.3.1-3
> > [2840kB]
> > > Fetched 2840kB in 38s (73.3kB/s)
> > > perl: warning: setting locale failed.
> > > perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
> > > LANGUAGE = (unset)
> > > LC_ALL = (unset)
> > > LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
> > > are supported and installed on your system.
> > > perl : warning:Falling back to the standard locale
> > ("C").
> > > locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such
> > file or directory
> > > (Reading database ... 99787 files and directories
> > currently installed.)
> > > Unpacking libsc7 (from .../libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb)
> > ...
> > > dpkg: error processing
> > /var/cache/apt/archives/libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb
> > (--unpack):
> > > trying to overwrite
> > '/usr/lib/libSCstate.so.7.1.0', which is also in
> > package libsc8
> > > dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken
> > pipe)
> > > Errors encountered while processing:
> > > /var/cache/apt/archives/lisc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb
> > > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned error code (1)
> > >
> > > Now libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb (Mar 15 19:47 2840478
> > bytes) is the only file present in /var/cache/apt/archives,
> > besides file "lock" (0 bytes) and directory
> > "partial" (empty).
> > >
> > > I did nothing else in the fear to damage the system
> >
> > libsc7 and libsc8 appear to conflict. Apparently you
> > can't have both
> > installed at once. Most likely you want to uninstall
> > libsc7 and
> > libsc7-dev. Perhaps libsc8-dev or libsc-dev is the package
> > you want
> > instead.
> >
> > --
> > Len Sorensen
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
>
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
>
>
> --
>
>
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
Pere Nubiola Radigales
Telf: +34 656316974
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
Hi:
Sorry for this lengthy dealing with libsc7/libsc8, though I would like to clean
the system, i.e. not to have these issues raised at each "apt-get upgrade".
Actually, now "apt-get upgrade" only results in:
Reading package list ...Done
Building dependency tree ... Done
You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct.
Packages with unmet dependencies:
libsc-dev: Depends: libsc7 (= 2.3.1-3) but it is not installed.
It seems to be unable to upgrading, unless there is nothing else.
I think that I don't need either libsc7 or libsc8. Both come from "The
Scientific Computing Toolkit" (Sandja Lab, mpqc) an extraordinary quantum
mechanical package that I used successfully, but one that unfortunately is not
being developed toward organic chemical applications. Therefore I don't use it
any more. There is a relationship with "ghemical" that I don't use either on
this amd64 system (I barely run 'startx' on rare occasions)
I did some search:
apt-cache rdepends libsc7
ENTER
Reverse Depends:
mpqc-support
mpqc
libsc-dev
libghemical3gf
apt-cache rdepends libsc8
ENTER
Reverse Depends:
[nothing reported]
If I carry out the same commands with i386 (where mpqc is still installed), for
libsc7 there is one line more "libghemical0c2a", while for libsc8 the answer is
"no package found".
Thanks
francesco pietra
--- On Tue, 5/6/08, Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
> To: "Francesco Pietra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "C. Ahlstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "debian64"
>
> Date: Tuesday, May 6, 2008, 7:32 AM
> On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:57:43AM -0700, Francesco Pietra
> wrote:
> > Hi:
> > Following
> >
> > # apt-get clean
> >
> > then
> >
> > #apt-get update
> > #apt-get upgrade
> >
> > the system was no more complaining about libsc7,
> though it was about libsc7-dev (unmet dependencies as it
> depends from libsc7). Suggested "apt-get -f
> install", which I did; it asked permission to install
> libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.
> > I accepted:
> >
> > Get:1 http://ftp.debian.org lenny/main libsc7 2.3.1-3
> [2840kB]
> > Fetched 2840kB in 38s (73.3kB/s)
> > perl: warning: setting locale failed.
> > perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
> > LANGUAGE = (unset)
> > LC_ALL = (unset)
> > LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
> > are supported and installed on your system.
> > perl : warning:Falling back to the standard locale
> ("C").
> > locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such
> file or directory
> > (Reading database ... 99787 files and directories
> currently installed.)
> > Unpacking libsc7 (from .../libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb)
> ...
> > dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb
> (--unpack):
> > trying to overwrite
> '/usr/lib/libSCstate.so.7.1.0', which is also in
> package libsc8
> > dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken
> pipe)
> > Errors encountered while processing:
> > /var/cache/apt/archives/lisc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb
> > E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned error code (1)
> >
> > Now libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb (Mar 15 19:47 2840478
> bytes) is the only file present in /var/cache/apt/archives,
> besides file "lock" (0 bytes) and directory
> "partial" (empty).
> >
> > I did nothing else in the fear to damage the system
>
> libsc7 and libsc8 appear to conflict. Apparently you
> can't have both
> installed at once. Most likely you want to uninstall
> libsc7 and
> libsc7-dev. Perhaps libsc8-dev or libsc-dev is the package
> you want
> instead.
>
> --
> Len Sorensen
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 12:57:43AM -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> Hi:
> Following
>
> # apt-get clean
>
> then
>
> #apt-get update
> #apt-get upgrade
>
> the system was no more complaining about libsc7, though it was about
> libsc7-dev (unmet dependencies as it depends from libsc7). Suggested "apt-get
> -f install", which I did; it asked permission to install libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.
> I accepted:
>
> Get:1 http://ftp.debian.org lenny/main libsc7 2.3.1-3 [2840kB]
> Fetched 2840kB in 38s (73.3kB/s)
> perl: warning: setting locale failed.
> perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
> LANGUAGE = (unset)
> LC_ALL = (unset)
> LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
> are supported and installed on your system.
> perl : warning:Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
> locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
> (Reading database ... 99787 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking libsc7 (from .../libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb) ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb
> (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libSCstate.so.7.1.0', which is also in package
> libsc8
> dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
> Errors encountered while processing:
> /var/cache/apt/archives/lisc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned error code (1)
>
> Now libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb (Mar 15 19:47 2840478 bytes) is the only file
> present in /var/cache/apt/archives, besides file "lock" (0 bytes) and
> directory "partial" (empty).
>
> I did nothing else in the fear to damage the system
libsc7 and libsc8 appear to conflict. Apparently you can't have both
installed at once. Most likely you want to uninstall libsc7 and
libsc7-dev. Perhaps libsc8-dev or libsc-dev is the package you want
instead.
--
Len Sorensen
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
Hi:
Following
# apt-get clean
then
#apt-get update
#apt-get upgrade
the system was no more complaining about libsc7, though it was about libsc7-dev
(unmet dependencies as it depends from libsc7). Suggested "apt-get -f install",
which I did; it asked permission to install libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.
I accepted:
Get:1 http://ftp.debian.org lenny/main libsc7 2.3.1-3 [2840kB]
Fetched 2840kB in 38s (73.3kB/s)
perl: warning: setting locale failed.
perl: warning: Please check that your locale settings:
LANGUAGE = (unset)
LC_ALL = (unset)
LANG = "en_US.UTF-8"
are supported and installed on your system.
perl : warning:Falling back to the standard locale ("C").
locale: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale: No such file or directory
(Reading database ... 99787 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking libsc7 (from .../libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb) ...
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb
(--unpack):
trying to overwrite '/usr/lib/libSCstate.so.7.1.0', which is also in package
libsc8
dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
Errors encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/lisc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned error code (1)
Now libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb (Mar 15 19:47 2840478 bytes) is the only file
present in /var/cache/apt/archives, besides file "lock" (0 bytes) and directory
"partial" (empty).
I did nothing else in the fear to damage the system
Thanks for advice
francesco pietra
--- On Mon, 5/5/08, Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Lennart Sorensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
> To: "C. Ahlstrom" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: "Francesco Pietra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "debian64"
>
> Date: Monday, May 5, 2008, 11:45 AM
> On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 01:56:22PM -0400, C. Ahlstrom wrote:
> > Francesco Pietra 09:43 Mon 05 May
>
> >
> > >Also a naive question: why all those deb packages
> in
> > >/var/cache/apt/archives ?
> >
> > To save download time if needed again later.
> >
> > Every so often they fill up /var on me (I tend to
> update manually almost
> > every day) and then things stop working until I delete
> those files. I
> > hate that.
>
> 'apt-get autoclean' will delete any that are
> obsolete and can not ever
> be needed again.
> 'apt-get clean' removes all of them.
>
> --
> Len Sorensen
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 08:39:26PM -0400, Douglas A. Tutty wrote: > Run aptitude with no parameters and enter the interactive interface. > Run a search on libsc7 and see. Actually its not a long list, here it > is: > ghemical > libghemical0c2a > libsc-dev > mpqc "apt-cache rdepends libsc7" provides the same information, fyi. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:43:05AM -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote:
> I have updated from etch to lenny (UMA type machine dual opterons raid1) by
> just replacing "etch" with "lenny" in sources.list. Got a single error while
> processing
>
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb
what error exactly?
>
> Running
>
> #apt-get -f install
>
> reported the same error.
what error?
>
> I remember that library was in connection with a quantum-mechanical
> computation program "mpqc" (from the Sandja lab), which is deb
> packaged but which is no more installed on this machine ("which mpqc"
> and varieties of this command for the executable do not report
> anything).
>
> Is that library needed for something else?
Run aptitude with no parameters and enter the interactive interface.
Run a search on libsc7 and see. Actually its not a long list, here it
is:
ghemical
libghemical0c2a
libsc-dev
mpqc
So if you don't have any of those installed, you can go ahead and remove
it.
> Also a naive question: why all those deb packages in
> /var/cache/apt/archives ?
When you install a deb, the deb is archived there incase something goes
wrong during install and you need to try again without re-downloading
it, or you want to keep it around for other boxes, or you want to remove
and reinstall. You can remove all of them with aptitude clean or just
remove ones that are nolonger valid with aptitude autoclean. You can do
either from the aptitude interactive interface.
Doug.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 09:43:05AM -0700, Francesco Pietra wrote:
>
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb
>
> I remember that library was in connection with a quantum-mechanical
> computation program "mpqc" (from the Sandja lab), which is deb packaged but
> which is no more installed on this machine ("which mpqc" and varieties of
> this command for the executable do not report anything).
>
> Is that library needed for something else?
One way to find out:
sudo apt-get remove libsc7_2.3.1
It will remove all that depends on the package as well. Before doing it, it
will ask if you are sure. Say no, or hit Ctrl-C, unless the package list
looks totally harmless to you.
> Also a naive question: why all those deb packages in /var/cache/apt/archives ?
Probably to make reinstalling faster. I usually do
sudo apt-get clean
as a part of my weekly(?) update routine, and it seems to keep them away.
Actually, my routine command (cut and pasted from the wiki page where I note
the changes) is
sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get dist-upgrade -u && sudo apt-get clean
-H
--
Heikki Levanto "In Murphy We Turst" heikki (at) lsd (dot) dk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
On Mon, May 05, 2008 at 01:56:22PM -0400, C. Ahlstrom wrote: > Francesco Pietra 09:43 Mon 05 May > > >Also a naive question: why all those deb packages in > >/var/cache/apt/archives ? > > To save download time if needed again later. > > Every so often they fill up /var on me (I tend to update manually almost > every day) and then things stop working until I delete those files. I > hate that. 'apt-get autoclean' will delete any that are obsolete and can not ever be needed again. 'apt-get clean' removes all of them. -- Len Sorensen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
Francesco Pietra 09:43 Mon 05 May Also a naive question: why all those deb packages in /var/cache/apt/archives ? To save download time if needed again later. Every so often they fill up /var on me (I tend to update manually almost every day) and then things stop working until I delete those files. I hate that. Chris -- I am -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fw: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
I forgot to mention that libsc-dev has unmet dependencies, depending on libsc7
(= 2.3.1-3)
--- On Mon, 5/5/08, Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Francesco Pietra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
> To: "debian64"
> Date: Monday, May 5, 2008, 9:43 AM
> I have updated from etch to lenny (UMA type machine dual
> opterons raid1) by just replacing "etch" with
> "lenny" in sources.list. Got a single error while
> processing
>
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb
>
> Running
>
> #apt-get -f install
>
> reported the same error.
>
> I remember that library was in connection with a
> quantum-mechanical computation program "mpqc"
> (from the Sandja lab), which is deb packaged but which is
> no more installed on this machine ("which mpqc"
> and varieties of this command for the executable do not
> report anything).
>
> Is that library needed for something else?
>
> Also a naive question: why all those deb packages in
> /var/cache/apt/archives ?
>
> Thanks
> francesco pietra
>
>
>
>
> Be a better friend, newshound, and
> know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
> http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb problems
I have updated from etch to lenny (UMA type machine dual opterons raid1) by
just replacing "etch" with "lenny" in sources.list. Got a single error while
processing
/var/cache/apt/archives/libsc7_2.3.1-3_amd64.deb
Running
#apt-get -f install
reported the same error.
I remember that library was in connection with a quantum-mechanical computation
program "mpqc" (from the Sandja lab), which is deb packaged but which is no
more installed on this machine ("which mpqc" and varieties of this command for
the executable do not report anything).
Is that library needed for something else?
Also a naive question: why all those deb packages in /var/cache/apt/archives ?
Thanks
francesco pietra
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
