Re: status of vmware

2005-01-16 Thread Harald Dunkel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brett Profitt wrote:
| I have had exactly the opposite experience.  Vmware 4.5 with the any-any
| patches works perfectly for me, while v5 beta won't even install,
| complaining about the ia32-libs, and asking me to upgrade from libc5 to
| glibc.  Did you do anything special to get it to install?
|
See http://bugs.debian.org/287241
You can grab the i386 library. But AFAIK this is necessary
just at installation time. VMware e.x.p-11888 includes its
own libXrender.so .
Regards
Harri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFB6ic9UTlbRTxpHjcRAo/PAJ9TIHnSb8BfWHc/3Cx5u3hiP//R+ACfbTjN
2QDtBZcUN6V1YhQaJOBXK1U=
=77ti
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: status of vmware

2005-01-15 Thread Pete
On Sat, 2005-01-15 at 20:01 +, Manuel Capinha wrote:
> Are you guys (and girls) running it under full-screen ?
> I've had no problems with vmware (4.5 with the any-any patches)
> running XP but everytime i try going full screen it freezes my machine
> :/
> 
> Wait, I have one weird problem, but I'm sure it's not debian or amd64
> related: everytime I join my vmwared XP to our Windows Domain my samba
> printer database (the .tdb files) get corrupted..
> 
> Manuel
> 
> 
I have tried running GSX server 3.1, but the any any patch says it
doesn't have a patch for the binary, and when you run vmware-console, it
just hangs.

Under 32 bit, it runs perfectly.

Pete


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: status of vmware

2005-01-15 Thread Manuel Capinha
Are you guys (and girls) running it under full-screen ?
I've had no problems with vmware (4.5 with the any-any patches)
running XP but everytime i try going full screen it freezes my machine
:/

Wait, I have one weird problem, but I'm sure it's not debian or amd64
related: everytime I join my vmwared XP to our Windows Domain my samba
printer database (the .tdb files) get corrupted..

Manuel


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: status of vmware

2005-01-15 Thread Brett Profitt
I have had exactly the opposite experience.  Vmware 4.5 with the any-any
patches works perfectly for me, while v5 beta won't even install,
complaining about the ia32-libs, and asking me to upgrade from libc5 to
glibc.  Did you do anything special to get it to install?
Thanks,
Brett
David Wood wrote:
My brief impression of vmware 4.5 with the any-any patches was that it 
was so unstable as to basically be unusuable for anything but a proof 
of concept.

Vmware has begun an open beta program for v5, which I can report is 
substantially improved (only one crash so far). However, given how 
these things could work, there could be a long lag between the beta 
shutting down and the commercial release...

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, kristian kvilekval wrote:
Could someone update what is the status of vmware
running on debian amd64.  Unfortunately I may
need to install windows and would rather stick
it in vmware than run it natively.
Thanks,
kris

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: status of vmware

2005-01-15 Thread A. P. Kennedy
> "David" == David Wood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

 David> Wait, how does this work? I thought it required kernel
 David> modules, built against the running (64-bit) kernel, which is
 David> the point of the any-any patches...

It works fine. Install the any-any update and compile a 64 bit module
for vmware. I use it almost everyday for work ;-(. The only problem
that have noticed is usb devices are not correctly handled when
running vmware under 64 bit. 

Also it is very stable, and runs my work applications nicely. 

Alan


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: status of vmware

2005-01-15 Thread Harald Dunkel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
kristian kvilekval wrote:
| Could someone update what is the status of vmware
| running on debian amd64.  Unfortunately I may
| need to install windows and would rather stick
| it in vmware than run it natively.
|
I'm running the beta of VMware5 for more than
2 weeks now. It is running absolutely stable
for my needs.
VMWare e.x.p build-11608
vanilla kernel 2.6.10
amd64(gcc-3.4)
client os: WinXP Home Edition
Regards
Harri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFB6ObhUTlbRTxpHjcRAlYFAJ46n4YeKTBluZNV+TBG8DOIBpoiyACfQ8WI
2yKbhr4a8tpw+AM0+Wrz08I=
=z5db
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: status of vmware

2005-01-14 Thread Goswin von Brederlow
kristian kvilekval <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Could someone update what is the status of vmware
> running on debian amd64.  Unfortunately I may
> need to install windows and would rather stick
> it in vmware than run it natively.
>
> Thanks,
> kris
>
>
>
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I installed the vmware beta recently under pure64 with success.

MfG
Goswin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: status of vmware

2005-01-14 Thread David Liontooth
David Wood wrote:
Wait, how does this work? I thought it required kernel modules, built 
against the running (64-bit) kernel, which is the point of the any-any 
patches...
That's how I made it work. I haven't used it a lot, but I haven't had 
problems either. WinXP installed on Debian sid pure64. Incidentally, you 
may want to
try the free beta-version of WinXP-64bit, which seems to run better on 
amd64 hardware. I haven't tried it in vmware but would expect it to work.

Dave
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Nor wrote:

I'm running it but not in pure 64.
I've installed under /32-bit/ a debian distribution for 32 bits, and
this /etc/ld.so.conf and runs fine, but when I update glibc is nedded to
remove references to /32-bits/ libraries in /etc/ld.so.conf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/ld.so.conf
/usr/X11R6/lib
# chroot i386 system libs
/32-bits/lib
/32-bits/usr/lib
/32-bits/usr/X11R6/lib
/32-bits/usr/local/lib
If you are interested, also i also execute wine under /32-bits/ chrooted

El Viernes, 14 de Enero de 2005 22:10, kristian kvilekval escribió:
Could someone update what is the status of vmware
running on debian amd64.  Unfortunately I may
need to install windows and would rather stick
it in vmware than run it natively.
Thanks,
kris


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: status of vmware

2005-01-14 Thread David Wood
Wait, how does this work? I thought it required kernel modules, built 
against the running (64-bit) kernel, which is the point of the any-any 
patches...

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Nor wrote:

I'm running it but not in pure 64.
I've installed under /32-bit/ a debian distribution for 32 bits, and
this /etc/ld.so.conf and runs fine, but when I update glibc is nedded to
remove references to /32-bits/ libraries in /etc/ld.so.conf
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/ld.so.conf
/usr/X11R6/lib
# chroot i386 system libs
/32-bits/lib
/32-bits/usr/lib
/32-bits/usr/X11R6/lib
/32-bits/usr/local/lib
If you are interested, also i also execute wine under /32-bits/ chrooted

El Viernes, 14 de Enero de 2005 22:10, kristian kvilekval escribió:
Could someone update what is the status of vmware
running on debian amd64.  Unfortunately I may
need to install windows and would rather stick
it in vmware than run it natively.
Thanks,
kris



Re: status of vmware

2005-01-14 Thread Nor


I'm running it but not in pure 64.

I've installed under /32-bit/ a debian distribution for 32 bits, and 
this /etc/ld.so.conf and runs fine, but when I update glibc is nedded to 
remove references to /32-bits/ libraries in /etc/ld.so.conf 

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ cat /etc/ld.so.conf
/usr/X11R6/lib
# chroot i386 system libs
/32-bits/lib
/32-bits/usr/lib
/32-bits/usr/X11R6/lib
/32-bits/usr/local/lib


If you are interested, also i also execute wine under /32-bits/ chrooted



El Viernes, 14 de Enero de 2005 22:10, kristian kvilekval escribió:
> Could someone update what is the status of vmware
> running on debian amd64.  Unfortunately I may
> need to install windows and would rather stick
> it in vmware than run it natively.
>
> Thanks,
> kris



Re: status of vmware

2005-01-14 Thread David Wood
My brief impression of vmware 4.5 with the any-any patches was that it was 
so unstable as to basically be unusuable for anything but a proof of 
concept.

Vmware has begun an open beta program for v5, which I can report is 
substantially improved (only one crash so far). However, given how these 
things could work, there could be a long lag between the beta shutting 
down and the commercial release...

On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, kristian kvilekval wrote:
Could someone update what is the status of vmware
running on debian amd64.  Unfortunately I may
need to install windows and would rather stick
it in vmware than run it natively.
Thanks,
kris

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


status of vmware

2005-01-14 Thread kristian kvilekval

Could someone update what is the status of vmware
running on debian amd64.  Unfortunately I may
need to install windows and would rather stick
it in vmware than run it natively.

Thanks,
kris



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]