Re: Is there tomcat 5.5.x debian package ?
Hi, On Mon, Aug 21, 2006, KLEIN Stéphane wrote: Is there tomcat 5.5.x debian package ? Yes, in experimental. (Check with packages.debian.org.) debian-apache@ does not maintain tomcat, pkg-java-maintainers@ does. Bye, -- Loïc Minier [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383615: marked as done (split out libaprutil1-dev sqlite, pgsql, ldap dependencies)
Your message dated Mon, 21 Aug 2006 14:23:03 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#383615: split out libaprutil1-dev sqlite, pgsql, ldap dependencies has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) ---BeginMessage--- Package: libaprutil1-dev Version: 1.2.7-2 Severity: wishlist I would like some of the libaprutil1-dev dependencies to be split out to additional packages ala php-mysql so that the following dependencies are optional and only installed by those who need. this could maybe be achieved by creating a libaprutil1-dev-base or -common and install the -sqlite package manually. users needing all packages could just install libaprutil1-dev like they do right now and get all dependencies without any change. libldap2-dev libsqlite3-dev libpq-dev libgdbm-dev libdb4.3-dev ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- * gmu 2k6 | it's not about disk space, it's about installing as few packages as | possible to have a clean selection with a minimum of update | needs/problems. | | if Debian is the universal OS then it should allow clean installs | without falling back to apt-build. This is a _development package_, not something which drags in lots of random on a nondeveloper's system. And even if it was, it's just a few libraries and nothing complicated. Compared with the extra overhead of maintaining a split libapr-dev, it's too much so we won't do it. | one of the major reasons I'm using Debian out of the binary | distros is that it allows me to install a minimal system and let | me decide which packages I want, most of the time. although | we are much better than RPM based distros which don't seem | to have a Suggest field some packages are not done right | regarding the features one can to enable/disable during | runtime. You can't disable the fact that libapr is linked with sqlite, postgres, ldap and more at runtime. | just take the libwxgtk packages which requires esound, this | is only so because the packager did not split the package | in -base, -sound, etc. the point here is that wxWindows is | most likely used for the GUI abstraction and not for sound. | insert `apt-cache depends xchm` here. xchm doesn't depend on and sound on my system at least. | I'm using libaprutil1-dev to build Subversion =1.3.x/1.4(rc) | and the dependency I saw with it is similar to installing some | font or graphics libs which require the whole Xorg baselibs | chain. I build Subversion, because Apache 2.2 is not in etch/sid | yet and so it is built against APR 1.0.x right now my own | -DLARGEFILE aka APR 1.2.x Subversion. btw, this does not | mean I'm using mod_dav_svn, svnserve is all I need as of know. You're aware that subversion 1.4rc is in experimental, right? I'm closing this bug since we have no interest in the extra overhead; sorry. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- ---End Message---
RE: Is there tomcat 5.5.x debian package ?
Stephanie, This resource may be of some assistance to you. http://www.crazysquirrel.com/computing/debian/tomcat55.jspx Cary Cary Pembleton IT Consultant PC Tech Help, LLC 32 Cove Lane Campbellsville, KY 42718 (270) 789-0187 Office http://www.pctechhelp.net -Original Message- From: news [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of KLEIN Stéphane Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2006 6:30 PM To: debian-apache@lists.debian.org Subject: Is there tomcat 5.5.x debian package ? Hello, Is there tomcat 5.5.x debian package ? Regards Stephane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383615: split out libaprutil1-dev sqlite, pgsql, ldap dependencies
On 8/21/06, Tollef Fog Heen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * gmu 2k6 | it's not about disk space, it's about installing as few packages as | possible to have a clean selection with a minimum of update | needs/problems. | | if Debian is the universal OS then it should allow clean installs | without falling back to apt-build. This is a _development package_, not something which drags in lots of random on a nondeveloper's system. And even if it was, it's just a few libraries and nothing complicated. Compared with the extra overhead of maintaining a split libapr-dev, it's too much so we won't do it. | one of the major reasons I'm using Debian out of the binary | distros is that it allows me to install a minimal system and let | me decide which packages I want, most of the time. although | we are much better than RPM based distros which don't seem | to have a Suggest field some packages are not done right | regarding the features one can to enable/disable during | runtime. You can't disable the fact that libapr is linked with sqlite, postgres, ldap and more at runtime. as I proposed you could build additional packages which enable the db-backends. | just take the libwxgtk packages which requires esound, this | is only so because the packager did not split the package | in -base, -sound, etc. the point here is that wxWindows is | most likely used for the GUI abstraction and not for sound. | insert `apt-cache depends xchm` here. xchm doesn't depend on and sound on my system at least. $ apt-cache depends xchm xchm Depends: libc6 Depends: libchm1 Depends: libgcc1 Depends: libstdc++6 Depends: libwxbase2.6-0 Depends: libwxgtk2.6-0 Depends: libchm1 Conflicts: chmlib $ apt-cache depends libwxgtk2.6-0 libwxgtk2.6-0 Depends: libatk1.0-0 Depends: libc6 |Depends: libesd0 Depends: libesd-alsa0 Depends: libexpat1 Depends: libfontconfig1 Depends: libgcc1 |Depends: libgl1-mesa-glx Depends: libgl1 libgl1-mesa-directfb libgl1-mesa-glide3 libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-swx11 Depends: libglib2.0-0 |Depends: libglu1-mesa Depends: libglu1 libglu1-mesa Depends: libgtk2.0-0 Depends: libjpeg62 Depends: libpango1.0-0 Depends: libpng12-0 Depends: libstdc++6 Depends: libtiff4 Depends: libwxbase2.6-0 Depends: libx11-6 | I'm using libaprutil1-dev to build Subversion =1.3.x/1.4(rc) | and the dependency I saw with it is similar to installing some | font or graphics libs which require the whole Xorg baselibs | chain. I build Subversion, because Apache 2.2 is not in etch/sid | yet and so it is built against APR 1.0.x right now my own | -DLARGEFILE aka APR 1.2.x Subversion. btw, this does not | mean I'm using mod_dav_svn, svnserve is all I need as of know. You're aware that subversion 1.4rc is in experimental, right? no, I wasn't but maybe I should start pinning some experimental packages, thanks. I'm closing this bug since we have no interest in the extra overhead; sorry. you don't have to be sorry, we did at least discuss my issue with it and now that I see your point I know that it won't change and have to find a different way to cope with it. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384117: debian/rules preselects apr_lock_method wrong
Package: apr Version: 1.2.7 Severity: important in debian/rules I had to comment out that line: ifeq ($(DEB_BUILD_ARCH),i386) # CONFFLAGS=apr_lock_method=USE_PROC_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE CONFFLAGS= else ...after some hours of investigation! I have no idea what this should be usefull for, but include/apr.h says: #define APR_USE_FLOCK_SERIALIZE 0 #define APR_USE_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZE 1 #define APR_USE_POSIXSEM_SERIALIZE0 #define APR_USE_FCNTL_SERIALIZE 0 #define APR_USE_PROC_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE0 #define APR_USE_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE 1 #define APR_HAS_FLOCK_SERIALIZE 1 #define APR_HAS_SYSVSEM_SERIALIZE 1 #define APR_HAS_POSIXSEM_SERIALIZE0 #define APR_HAS_FCNTL_SERIALIZE 1 #define APR_HAS_PROC_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE0 ./configure does not detect APR_HAS_PROC_PTHREAD_SERIALIZE, so no need to force it using that. - I forget where it broke compiling, but at least one file has some #ifdefs that look on the _HAS_ on one side and on the _USE_ on the other. They should match, but they didn't with CONFFLAGS in force. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.21 Locale: LANG=spanish, LC_CTYPE=spanish (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to es_ES) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
