Re: Bug#894713: stretch-pu: apache2/2.4.25-3+deb9u5

2018-06-24 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2018-06-02 at 10:29 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> +apache2 (2.4.25-3+deb9u5) stretch; urgency=medium
> +
> +  * This package upgrades mod_http2 to the version from apache2
> 2.4.33. This
> +fixes a lot of bugs and some security issues, but it also
> removes the
> +support for using HTTP/2 when running with mpm_prefork. HTTP/2
> support
> +is only provided when running with mpm_event or mpm_worker.
> +
> + -- Stefan Fritsch   Sat, 02 Jun 2018 09:51:46 +0200

Do we have any idea how common such a configuration is? (Or, indeed,
how common the use of HTTP/2 with stretch's apache is.)

Regards,

Adam



Re: apache2 still not migrating to stretch

2015-07-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2015-07-12 at 11:43 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> On Thursday 09 July 2015 14:35:17, Jean-Michel Vourgère wrote:
> > Ops, actually, the message changed, and #789914 now seems to be the
> > source of the migration blockade.
> 
> #789914 affects jessie + stretch, too. I have added a 'found' to the 
> bts so it should now migrate. I would prefer to have the current 
> package migrate before a new upload.

Was that mail CCed to the control bot? Whilst
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=789914#18 shows the
intent, there's no sign of the found version actually being added.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1436738284.1935.6.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk



Re: Bug#733564: pu: apache2 with ECDHE support

2014-06-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending

On Sun, 2014-05-25 at 17:55 +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> I have just uploaded apache2_2.2.22-13+deb7u2:

Flagged for acceptance; sorry for the delay.

> apache2 (2.2.22-13+deb7u2) wheezy; urgency=medium
> 
>   * Backport support for SSL ECC keys and ECDH ciphers.

For anyone following the bug log, testing of the above change before the
point release would be much appreciated.

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1402869965.31219.22.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org



Re: Bug#733564: pu: apache2 with ECDHE support

2014-05-12 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2014-05-12 at 23:29 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 10:34:43PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > +  * Actually restart the services when restart-without-asking is set.
> > +(Closes: #745801)
> > 
> > That change wasn't previously mentioned and is not fixed in the unstable
> > package yet; is there an ETA for doing so? (I tried to check the repo
> > mentioned in Vcs-*, but it doesn't appear to have been updated since
> > February.)
> 
> It's now uploaded to unstable, and everything should be in svn now.

Great; +deb7u8 flagged for acceptance.

> I'd also like to upload the fix for CVE-2014-0198 to
> wheezy-security.

That I can't do much about. ;)

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1399930648.4567.18.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org



Re: Bug#733564: pu: apache2 with ECDHE support

2014-05-07 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2014-05-01 at 15:59 +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 09:57:21PM +0200, Stefan Fritsch wrote:
> > Am Montag, 14. April 2014, 21:18:46 schrieb Philipp Kern:
> > > So I'd say that we should go and add ECDHE support to Apache as
> > > suggested and also patch OpenSSL for the OS X bug as the
> > > fingerprinting landed upstream and we would merely replicate
> > > current upstream behavior.
[...]
> I've just uploaded it.

+  * Actually restart the services when restart-without-asking is set.
+(Closes: #745801)

That change wasn't previously mentioned and is not fixed in the unstable
package yet; is there an ETA for doing so? (I tried to check the repo
mentioned in Vcs-*, but it doesn't appear to have been updated since
February.)

Regards,

Adam


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
https://lists.debian.org/1399498483.17873.24.ca...@jacala.jungle.funky-badger.org



Re: apr-utils: FTBFS (" expected 'int (*)(struct LDAP *, const char *, ber_tag_t, ber_int_t, void *)' but argument is of type 'int (*)(struct LDAP *, const char *, int, ber_int_t)'")

2011-12-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt

# Full quote for the benefit of the maintainers
reassign 651147 apr-util/1.3.12+dfsg-2
thanks

On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 08:04:20 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

Source: apr-utils
Severity: serious
Version: 1.3.12+dfsg-2

Hi,

apr-util FTBFS with an error in apr_ldap_rebind.c.  The failures
visible on buildd.d.o only affect armhf and s390x, as those are the
only architectures which have tried the package recently, but I've
verified with a local build that the issue also occurs on amd64, 
hence

the severity.

From the armhf build log:

ldap/apr_ldap_rebind.c: In function 'apr_ldap_rebind_set_callback':
ldap/apr_ldap_rebind.c:330:5: warning: passing argument 2 of
'ldap_set_rebind_proc' from incompatible pointer type [enabled by
default]
/usr/include/ldap.h:976:1: note: expected 'int (*)(struct LDAP *,
const char *, ber_tag_t,  ber_int_t,  void *)' but argument is of 
type

'int (*)(struct LDAP *, const char *, int,  ber_int_t)'
ldap/apr_ldap_rebind.c:330:5: error: too few arguments to function
'ldap_set_rebind_proc'
/usr/include/ldap.h:976:1: note: declared here
make[2]: *** [ldap/apr_ldap_rebind.lo] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory

`/build/buildd-apr-util_1.3.12+dfsg-2-armhf-dZS91O/apr-util-1.3.12+dfsg'
make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make: *** [build-stamp] Error 2
dpkg-buildpackage: error: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2

Full logs available via
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=apr-util

Regards,

Adam



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/86ffb939f014c9249f364ecd305e0...@mail.adsl.funky-badger.org



Bug#616323: segfaults when serving HTTP requests (including non-PHP ones) on kfreebsd-i386

2011-03-06 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 15:11 +0100, Robert Millan wrote:
> 2011/3/4 Petr Salinger :
> >
> > After rebuild of php5 against such header, apache responds.
> 
> "build-rdeps libapr1-dev" lists 25 more packages, how would we go
> about having all them binNMUed, contact buildd admins?

No, you ask debian-release.

However,
http://lists.debian.org/20110305204400.24459.21254.report...@k.lan
suggests that the majority of packages will already be dtrt and don't
need rebuilding.

Regards,

Adam




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1299425906.25972.11672.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org