Bug#606334: apache2: fails to start with dependency based boot if DNS is required by configuration
]] Bjørn Mork | This could easily be resolved by adding | | # Should-Start: $named | | to the apache2 init script. Please fix for squeeze. Thanks. Actually, it should be Required-Start, as per http://refspecs.freestandards.org/LSB_3.1.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/facilname.html: $named: IP name-to-address translation, using the interfaces described in this specification, are available to the level the system normally provides them. Example: if a DNS query daemon normally provides this facility, then that daemon has been started I don't know if sysvinit is smart enough to know whether /etc/resolv.conf points at localhost or not, but if it's not, it should be fixed so it'll DTRT here even if there's nothing providing $named. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zksdsofu@qurzaw.varnish-software.com
Bug#583127: apache2: add monit subconfig file
]] Stefan Alfredsson | Maybe a compromise would be to include a configuration set of "core services" in | monit that are monitored by default, and more seldom used services could provide | a configuration symlink if needed (but how would monit know which services | to enable to avoid lots of "service down" warnings when e.g. apache is not even | installed...). | | Or, just go ahead and put the symlink there from the postinst script and remove it | from prerm :-). Thats what the monit.d directory is there for anyway. I'd suggest shipping the example monit config in /usr/share/doc/apache2/examples so people who use monit can integrate it easily, but installing monit doesn't mean it'll suddenly start restarting your apache just because you've moved it away from port 80, for instance. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87r5kuewqz@qurzaw.linpro.no
Bug#574565: should remove ssl-cert group at purge if unused, and maybe add user to group
severity 574565 wishlist thanks ]] Jonas Smedegaard | Package: ssl-cert | Version: 1.0.25 | Severity: serious Serious? What would the justification for that be? | ssl-cert adds a group at install which is not removed again at purge. Yes, this is normal behaviour, and I think it's wanted behaviour in this case as you'll quite easily end up with files not owned by a named group if we remove the group again. | Also, since ssl-cert creates only a group, and order of install or purge | is nondeterministic, other packages cannot reliably cleanup the group if | they are purged last. Order of install is determined by dependency fields, quite deterministic, I'd say. | Problem discovered during resolving of bug#574214. This seems to be a missing depends on the group or failing to add the group if it does not exist already, not in any way related to whether ssl-cert removes the group on purge. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87aau38i42@qurzaw.linpro.no
Bug#571714: apache 2.2.14 doesn't parse php5 in public_html
reassign 571714 libapache2-mod-php5 thanks ]] fcel2001 | Package: apache2 | Version: 2.2.14.5 | | After an update of apache2 and php5 by aptitude, apache2 stopped to | parse php scripts in ~/public_html/ : apache just let to download the | related .php files. | I tryed to change /etc/apache2/mods-available/php5.conf : This file is not shipped by apache, but by php, so reassigning this bug. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87zl2tyfrq@qurzaw.linpro.no
Bug#542950: apache2-suexec: Please change default docroot to /srv/www
]] Julien Valroff | /var/www not being defined in FHS and being under the control of the local administrator [0], | default docroot for Apache SuExec should be changed to /srv/www [1] No, it should not. You can not assume _anything_ about the structure underneath /srv. | Debian packages are not supposed to install any files in /var/www [2], but packages making use | of Apache SuExec have no other choice for now to make things work out of the box. | | Currently, dspam-webfrontend is the only package in the archive depending on apache2-suexec, and | work is in progress to update the dspam packages, with one of the goal being to move files away from | /var/www Moving to /srv/www will grant you an RC bug for a FHS violation, so while we might want to reconsider what the default docroot should be for a2-suexec, it's surely not going to be /srv/www. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#540016: ssl-cert: fails to install
]] sistemas severity 540016 normal thanks | Fails to install because of not using --force-badname when creating group | ssl-cert. This is the install log: What does «grep NAME_REGEX /etc/adduser.conf» return? -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#514008: apache2: Alias for /usr/share/images missing?
]] Reuben Thomas | On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | | > Given that /usr/share/images is not only used by web packages, I think | > the answer is «no». Those packages should make sure to set up the | > necessary aliases they need (or we could have something like | > /usr/share/httpd/images that would be shipped in apache2.2-common and | > which would be in the default config). | | Should I file bugs against packages that don't set up these links then? Yes, I think that makes sense. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#514008: apache2: Alias for /usr/share/images missing?
]] Reuben Thomas | As far as I can see, web applications designed to run under Apache | install images under /usr/share/images and expect the URL /images to be | aliased to this directory. However, I can't find any traces of it in the | default apache2 configuration, though it's easy enough to add an Alias | line to alias.conf. | | Should this not be in the default configuration? Given that /usr/share/images is not only used by web packages, I think the answer is «no». Those packages should make sure to set up the necessary aliases they need (or we could have something like /usr/share/httpd/images that would be shipped in apache2.2-common and which would be in the default config). -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: apache2 override disparity
]] Debian Installer
| apache2-mpm-event_2.2.11-1_i386.deb: package says section is web, override
says net.
| apache2-mpm-prefork_2.2.11-1_i386.deb: package says section is web, override
says net.
| apache2-mpm-worker_2.2.11-1_i386.deb: package says section is web, override
says net.
| apache2-prefork-dev_2.2.11-1_i386.deb: package says priority is extra,
override says optional.
| apache2-threaded-dev_2.2.11-1_i386.deb: package says priority is extra,
override says optional.
| apache2-utils_2.2.11-1_i386.deb: package says section is web, override says
net.
| apache2.2-common_2.2.11-1_i386.deb: package says section is web, override
says net.
| apache2_2.2.11-1_all.deb: package says section is web, override says net.
Hi,
I think the control file information in the package is correct here and
the overrides should be changed.
The web section's description on packages.d.o is «Web servers, browsers,
proxies, download tools etc.», which Apache HTTPd very much is.
apache2-{prefork,threaded}-dev are priority extra since they conflict
with each other.
--
Tollef Fog Heen
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#497065: Please build two binaries, one with inflated depends and one without
]] Peter Samuelson | What a mess. I don't think any of that is appropriate for lenny at | this time. fwiw, I don't think it's worth the effort of saving a little bit of disk space post-lenny afterwards. There shouldn't be any security implications as the backends should be loaded on demand and not by default, AIUI. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#492463: apache2.2-common: Please enable mod_deflate by default
]] Stefan Fritsch | MSIE6 still has many problems with compression, especially for | non-text/html types. For lenny+1, we could consider a configuration | that compresses more file types but disables compression for MSIE6. For lenny+1 we should hopefully be able to ignore IE6 problems, just like we would ignore problems with Mosaic, Netscape and so on. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#468690: apache2: Apache is not always intented to be run as system-wide server
* Baptiste Mille-Mathias | Package: apache2 | Version: 2.2.8-1 | Severity: important Important? This sounds more like wishlist to me. | For instance gnome-user-share (a small graphical application to share | files over WebDAV) comes ith it own configuation file for apache to | share a specific user folder) depends on it, and after the installation, | apache is automatically launched to serve web pages on port 80, which is | not the intended behaviour and thus is not really secure. I don't see what's insecure about it showing the default web pages? Your use case is something that (as you have noticed) is not supported by the current package. I am not sure the complexity of having init scripts and such in another package (which would have to not be installed by default, no less) is something I want us to support. [...] | I'll be happy if you have some advice to workaround the problem in | the meantime. Remove the startup links? -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#417551: Already fixed
Version: 1.0.14 This bug was fixed a little time ago; closing by han now: ssl-cert (1.0.14) unstable; urgency=low * Updated debconf translations: - tr, thanks to Mehmet Türker (Closes: #417551) -- Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 3 Apr 2007 13:58:19 -0500 -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are
Bug#465279: ssl-cert: /var/lib/dpkg/info/ssl-cert.postinst of version 1.0.15 hangs inside chroot
* Michael Prokop | 17145:error:0E065068:configuration file routines:STR_COPY:variable has no value:conf_def.c:629:line 5 Did you first set RANDFILE to /dev/random? Is /dev/random available in the chroot? What does strac-ing the openssl process show you, and what does ls -l /proc/$pid_of_openssl/fd show you? | My chroot system (where ssl-cert can't be installed) is named "grml" | using /etc/hostname (but /etc/init.d/hostname.sh doesn't seem to be | executed), which is different from the outer system being | randomname.grml.org (where I'm bootstrapping from and what seems to | be the output of 'hostname -f'). Until now my setup always worked | just fine. Am I doing something wrong and it worked fine until now | just because of random luck or is the "hostname -f" change of | ssl-cert causing unwanted problems? :) I doubt it has anything to do with -f or not -f. -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#261349: make-ssl-cert script hangs
* Jan Evert van Grootheest | When I attempt to create a new certificate for imapd, using | make-ssl-cert, it runs just fine through the colored questions. | Then, apparently, openssl did not like what it got from | the colored questions and starts to ask its own questions. | Unfortunately, it hangs at the first and does not accept input. Hi, you filed bug #261349[1] some years ago in the Debian BTS. I'm sorry about us not having responded to it before, but I was wondering if you were still able to reproduce this in the current version, and if so if I may have a copy of the openssl.cnf you are using. [1]: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=261349 -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#444048: apache2: CGI scripts entirely broken
* "Nick Price" | And in case it was missed, in my public_html directory there is a .htaccess | file which contains the following: | addhandler cgi-script .pl Do you have Options ExecCGI for your cgi-bin directory too? -- Tollef Fog Heen UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug status
* Andreas Barth | There are still different opinions whether this is RC, or should rather | be considered wishlist+wontfix. Until there is a consensus about the | former, I won't touch this bug. The apache cabal decided that this is just a default changing. That the user hadn't selected any preferred default is unfortunate, but not really anything we can do about. [...] | I intend to NMU the issues marked with (*) as soon as the current | apache2 package went to testing - of course, only in case nobody has an | issue with the NMU. I have an issue with people NMUing packages where the maintainer is active. You NMU has so far cost me more than an hour's work of cleanup. Please don't do that ever again. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396631: apache2: This bug is also occuring on a system with a 2.6 kernel
* Ken Bowley | I am also seeing this bug and the error.log shows a segfault when | attempting to load a file. Directory lists work fine. Any chance any of you could provide an strace of a apache2 -X run on a 2.4 kernel when trying to serve a file? -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#274891: apache2-mpm-worker: mod_autoindex listings show incorrect last-modified date
* Mark Lord | mod_autoindex in Apache2 shows incorrect datestamps for last-modified | when displaying directory names as part of a directory index. | Files appear to display with the correct last-modified, but many | directories on my system all just show up with "11-Aug-2004 23:40", | including new ones created today (4-October-2004). You reported this bug ages ago, but I'm unable to reproduce this at all on my setup here. Are you still able to reproduce this? -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#395936: Apache2 SSL service stopped working since upgrade to 2.2.3-2
* Daan Willems | Apache2 error.log shows: [client ] Invalid method in request | \x16\x03\x01 This sounds like you're missing an SSLEnable for the vhost in question. Can you please check that, and if not, send us the relevant vhost config? -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Is it safe to purge apache2-common?
* Mike Bird | In light of recent reports of symlinks being removed[1], and | the statement that apache2.2 takes care of it if apache2 is | *not* purged[2], is it now safe to purge apache2-common? Should be. If not, it's a bug we'd very much like to get reported and fixed. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#395853: apache2-common: removes symlinks on upgrade
Thomas Schoepf skrev: Then don't purge it before installing apache2.2. apache2.2-common works around this. How does it do that? It does rm -f /var/lib/dpkg/info/apache2-common.postrm in its preinst. As this seems to be an user error rather than an error in the package, there's nothing we can do to fix this. Mind if I close the bug? Yes, I do mind. At least if you insist that it was my fault. Because then I'll insist that I rely on a package not to delete files that clearly weren't created by the package itself. Oh, but they were created by apache2-common. You purged the package, which means that you want to erase all traces of it. When you at the same time installed another package providing the same files, you are (from the package management point of view) inconsistent and stuff breaks. Otherwise I don't see much point in changing a package that doesn't exist anymore. Oh, it can't be changed anywhere it matters anyway. - tfheen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#395853: apache2-common: removes symlinks on upgrade
* "Thomas Schoepf" | > Given that a2dissite is not called as part of any of the maintainer | > scripts for apache2.2-common, I somehow don't think the problem lies | > with Apache here. | | apache2-common does remove all symlinks in its postrm on purge: | | for i in `find /etc/apache2 -type l`; do | rm -f "$i" | done Then don't purge it before installing apache2.2. apache2.2-common works around this. As this seems to be an user error rather than an error in the package, there's nothing we can do to fix this. Mind if I close the bug? -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#395854: apache2.2-common: does not run cgi-bin files anymore
* "Thomas Schoepf" | upgrade from apache2-common (I'm running testing). Now, I cannot run any cgi-bin files anymore. Default configuration does not work either. | Instead of running the cgi-bin files, my browser just shows me the source code of the cgi file. Do you have mod_cgi enabled? Note that the default configuration does not run any CGI files outside of /usr/lib/cgi-bin, so if you accepted the new conffiles, you might accidentially have gotten an «AddHandler cgi-script .cgi» directive disabled. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `-
Bug#395853: apache2-common: removes symlinks on upgrade
* "Thomas Schoepf" | package: apache2-common Please don't file bugs against non-existent packages. | I just upgraded from apache2-common to apache2.2-common. After the | upgrade, the symlink from /etc/apache2/sites-enabled to my | mediawiki1.7 configuration was removed. Given that a2dissite is not called as part of any of the maintainer scripts for apache2.2-common, I somehow don't think the problem lies with Apache here. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#394714: was Re: mod_ssl preventing apache2 from starting (segfault)
* Stefan Schmidt | On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 07:13:28PM +0200, Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | > | And as i quoted below i guess someone just broke epoll detection. | > | > Yes, or rather, it doesn't do runtime detection. Recompile libapr1 or | > use a 2.6 kernel. | | Peter Samuelson told me you might have a patch to do runtime detection which i | would consider the right way to handle this problem. Maybe. However, there are other 2.6-only APR features, so I need to find out which those are and turn them off. This is really what upstream is worried about. | > | .oO( apache2 (2.2.4-1) unstable; urgency=ultimate * Upstream release fixed | > | with cluebat ) | > There is no need to turn rude. | | Sorry i didn't mean to be rude, it was just my try on beeing funny while | trying to say that i think this should be handled more graciously. Nobody disagrees that this should be fixed. :-) -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#394714: was Re: mod_ssl preventing apache2 from starting (segfault)
* Stefan Schmidt | i see the same in gdb: | Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. | [Switching to Thread 16384 (LWP 22030)] | 0x4035016a in apr_pollset_add () from /usr/lib/libapr-1.so.0 | (gdb) bt | #0 0x4035016a in apr_pollset_add () from /usr/lib/libapr-1.so.0 | #1 0x0808851e in ap_graceful_stop_signalled () | #2 0x08088974 in ap_graceful_stop_signalled () | #3 0x0808973a in ap_mpm_run () | #4 0x080621ff in main () | | And as i quoted below i guess someone just broke epoll detection. Yes, or rather, it doesn't do runtime detection. Recompile libapr1 or use a 2.6 kernel. | Somehow i feel like CCing the apache people but as their bugzilla seems to be | unavailable and i cant find a fitting email-address i guess i have to stick | with you guys. | | .oO( apache2 (2.2.4-1) unstable; urgency=ultimate * Upstream release fixed | with cluebat ) There is no need to turn rude. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#394714: apache2-mpm-prefork: Apache2 child processes segfaults
reassign 394714 libapr1 forcemerge 392049 394714 thanks * David Muriel | It seems that the problem is related to libapr1 when using a 2.4 | kernel, so maybe this bug should be reassigned to libapr1 and merged | with those three. Indeed. Thanks for helping. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#394714: apache2-mpm-prefork: Apache2 child processes segfaults
* David Muriel | I just upgraded apache2 from version 2.0 to 2.2 and now apache2 no | longer starts. The file /var/log/apache2/error.log just shows this: This is probably a bug in some module. What modules do you have enabled? Can you get a sensible backtrace from gdb --args apache2 -X ? -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#394658: doesn't depend on correct versions
* Jayen Ashar | what's the point of having an apache2 package then? the package | doesn't really depend on anything then, just that you have any | implementation of apache2? Yes, what else would it depend on? | also, if another package depends on apache2 (>=2.2) then the apache2 | package should depend on an implementation representative of the | apache2 package's version. Why would any package depend on apache (>= 2.2)? -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#394658: doesn't depend on correct versions
severity 394658 wishlist tags 394658 + wontfix kthxbye * Jayen Ashar | I think there is a need for an exact dependency. I upgraded from | apache2 2.0.55-4.1 to apache2 2.2.3-2 and it didn't do anything. | Nothing REAL got upgraded. My copy of apache2-mpm-prefork stayed at | version 2.0.55-4.1. Yes, and? This isn't a bug, there is nothing in apache2's description which says «this ensures you have the latest version of all apache2 packages installed», and there shouldn't either. Dependencies should be as loose as possible, but no looser. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `-
Bug#394448: libapr1-dev: 'apr_off_t' errors
* Thibaut VARENE | I'm trying to build libapache-mod-musicindex on my machine for apache2. | This modules has been successfully built by the autobuilders, but here's | what happens today: use apr-util --cppflags, not just --cflags (or just use pkg-config) -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need INFLATE filter in apache 2
* (saf) | could you please upgrade to apache to version 2.2 for Debian AMD 64 port? | I need to the INFLATE filter which is only available beginning apache 2.2, | but my current amd 64 debian version uses only apache 2.0.54-5sarge1. apache2 in unstable is 2.2. There are no plans from the apache team to backport that to sarge, which you seem to be running. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#392799: Having the need to have "/proc" mounted in postinst halts installations in chroots, hence in debian-live.
Marco Amadori skrev: Alle 17:41, sabato 14 ottobre 2006, Tollef Fog Heen ha scritto: If we can't determine whether port 80 is in use or not, we assume it is. So if /proc is not mounted you could just assume that port 80 is free and do not fail the installation of package will be possible? It's actually not supposed to fail installation, just to not start apache until the NO_START switch in /etc/default/apache2 is flipped. This policy won't be changed. Patches for making the netstat not fail will probably be accepted, though. - tfheen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#392799: Having the need to have "/proc" mounted in postinst halts installations in chroots, hence in debian-live.
Marco Amadori skrev: But I think that it is not a clean way to proceed in a "create live environment" sense of a package, /proc filesystem means the "current hardware and kernel system" pack of informations and not a "generic debian system" informations nor an "hardwareless" or "kernelless" pack of information, so even if apache2 team wont fix this bug, asking to have /proc installed have only meanings of "current system" installs, not a generic one. So this bug is valid for all packages that requires /proc to finish the installation. Then you should build in a UML or Xen instance or something similar which is as close to a generic system as possible. Apache is just optimising for the common case, which is to install apache in a normal system where you don't want it to fall over because port 80 is in use already. If I dig maintainers scripts and provide a patch, could that be integrated asap or will just be a useless effort by me? I don't think you can, given that the way it currently works is by design. If we can't determine whether port 80 is in use or not, we assume it is. - tfheen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#392799: Having the need to have "/proc" mounted in postinst halts installations in chroots, hence in debian-live.
Marco Amadori skrev: I can tell you that it's not rocket science to get /proc mounted in your target chroot while installing packages and then, y'know, unmount it when you're done. In fact we did an hack for having /proc mounted in debian-live, but the bug regards also installing apache in chroots without /proc mounted, and I cannot see why having /proc mounted should be a requirements, others package maintainers have patched issues like this to have their packages building in automated building tools like pbuilder or similar, I think this could be an easy to add feature. pbuilder mounts proc. Seriously, there is no reason not to mount /proc in any and all chroots. But I think this bug instead of closed should be put on whislist at least, since it is not resolved but just put in a "I do not agree on that" form. The apache teams prefer not to have wontfix wishlist bugs around, as they're useless and clutter up the bug listing page which is big enough as is. - tfheen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#392646: apache2.2-common: doesn't start, child processes segfault
forcemerge 392049 392646 thanks John Fry skrev: Since I upgraded to apache2 on unstable, apache fails to start after trying to spawn a bunch of child processes. Here's a snippet from /var/log/apache2/error.log: Known bug in apr; it doesn't work correctly with 2.4 kernels. - tfheen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#391864: Removing apache2-common fails: API module structure `actions_module' in file /usr/lib/apache2/modules/mod_actions.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO?
Olaf van der Spek skrev: Hi, I'm still getting the DSO error although the bug is supposed to be fixed. Is there something trivial I missed (again)? Your system is in a wedged state that apache can't get you out of. Just chmod -x /usr/sbin/apache2 and the upgrade should work fine. - tfheen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#391864: apache2.2-common: install fails because all mod-enabled packages test as invalid
forcemerge 390786 391864 thanks Moshe Yudkowsky skrev: Package: apache2.2-common Version: 2.2.3-1 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable This bug has already been fixed. _PLEASE_ look at the list of recently closed bugs before filing new ones. Also, please make sure you use the latest version of the package. 2.2.3-2 was uploaded almost a week ago. - tfheen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#390819: Apache2.2 upgrade makes apache2-common --remove fail
* Madko | now that apache2 has been upgraded successfully to apache2.2, web server | cannot be started anymore: Correct, this is a bug in the PHP package. It doesn't depend on the proper ABI and a bug for this has been filed already. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#391636: Uninstallable due to unmet dep on libapr0
Tyler MacDonald skrev: Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Package: libbtutil0 Severity: serious Version: 0.0.19-1 Your package is not installable as it depends on libapr0 which is not available in unstable anymore. You might want to update the dependency to libapr1. I know. :-( Unfortunately, the apache2 in unstable doesn't install correctly anymore either because it fails to create /var/log/apache2, so I can't prove a working build in pbuilder. This has been fixed already. Somebody needs to upload a 2.2-compatible mod_perl, though. - tfheen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#385588: apache2-mpm-worker *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption
* Ruben Puettmann | *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x083af378 *** | [Fri Sep 01 13:54:19 2006] [notice] child pid 20732 exit signal Aborted (6) | *** glibc detected *** double free or corruption (!prev): 0x084355d0 *** | [Fri Sep 01 13:54:23 2006] [notice] child pid 23834 exit signal Aborted (6) This information is useless if you can't get us a backtrace. Please try to do so. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#390823: apache2-common cannot be purged.
* Steve Langasek | On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:11:04AM -0600, Steve Langasek wrote: | > So it's my recommendation to downgrade and "wontfix" this bug, since there's | > no way to fix apache2-common's postrm script after the fact without | > introducing a dummy package that re-breaks our dependency logic. | | Oh, alternatively, apache2.2-common's postinst script could have as its last | line: | |rm -f /var/lib/dpkg/info/apache2-common.postrm We discussed this fairly extensively on IRC today and are going to end up doing this. It's less crackful than the alternatives, really. Packaging apache has clearly scrambled my wits as well. :-) -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: libapache2-mod-php5
Kostas Tzounopoulos skrev: Ηi, I updated some minutes ago my debian sid amd64 to find out that libapache2-mod-php5 v5.1.6-3 is not compatible with the apache2 v2.2.3-1 with apache2.2-common v2.2.3-1 Correct, it's not compatible with the current version of apache in unstable. apache2: Syntax error on line 116 of /etc/apache2/apache2.conf: Syntax error on line 1 of /etc/apache2/mods-enabled/php5.load: API module structure `php5_module' in file /usr/lib/apache2/modules/libphp5.so is garbled - perhaps this is not an Apache module DSO? This is a bug already reported, thanks. - tfheen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#390817: apache2.2-common: /etc/apache2/*-available/ have .svn dirs inside
severity 390817 important force-merge 390817 390785 thanks Pierre Habouzit skrev: says it all. I happen to version my /etc/ files under svn, hence the loss that incured because it messed up with the .svn dirs in a bad way. Please look at already-filed bugs before filing new bugs. - tfheen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Apache 2 and LFS?
Steve McIntyre skrev: I was doing some testing today using DVD images, and was surprised to see that the apache2 in unstable still does not have LFS support. I saw the same issue reported in #386024, and I can see #383774 asking for LFS to be enabled. There is clearly no simple fix, as mentioned there - modules need to be recompiled and tested. Thom confirmed this on irc today too. So, onto my question: The simples fix is to upload apache 2.2 to unstable, something I'm working on. It's unfortunately not very easy to help -- you can check out from svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-apache and test that upgrades, etc work correctly, and provide patches for any issues you encounter. - tfheen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#356430: Apache2 stop/reload/restart conflict
Ramon M. Branquinho skrev: apache2-mpm-prefork works fine and dandy until you install: libapache2-mod-perl2 libapache2-mod-php4 "/etc/init.d/apache2 stop" will freeze and wont kill any processes I can't reproduce this. Can you please try again and see if you still see the problem? If so, please provide an strace of apache2 -t. - tfheen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#384882: apache 2.2 does not work with current php4/php5 modules
* Laurent Bonnaud | I'm going to raise the severity of this bug because breaking another | package deserves a "grave" severity. I'd rather argue it's a wishlist priority and again PHP for that. They should build packages for experimental. | To solve this problem, why not rename the experimental apache packages | to apache2.2-* ? New and updated PHP packages could then be produced | and depend on apache2.2. It would also allow to have both apache 2.0 | and 2.2 in the archive for a smooth transition and the admin could | choose which version(s) to install (as can be currently done with apache | 1.3 and 2.0). Because there's no need to coinstall apache 2.0 and 2.2, we're not going to take on the extra maintenance burden of maintaining three different versions of apache. Two is quite enough. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#383615: split out libaprutil1-dev sqlite, pgsql, ldap dependencies
* "gmu 2k6" | I would like some of the libaprutil1-dev dependencies to be split | out to additional packages ala php-mysql so that the following | dependencies are optional and only installed by those who need. Why? I'm not inclined to do it for just a few files; disk space is cheap and even more so on development systems. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#378105: apr-util: .pc and apu-config --libs list recursive deps
* Peter Samuelson | Package: libaprutil1-dev | Version: 1.2.7-2 | Severity: minor | Tags: patch | | $ pkg-config --libs apr-util-1 | -laprutil-1 -lldap -llber -ldb-4.3 -lpq -lsqlite3 -lexpat -lapr-1 | | $ apu-1-config --libs |-lldap -llber -ldb-4.3 -lpq -lsqlite3 -lexpat | | These really should not list recursive dependencies except with the | --static flag to pkg-config. Your patch has now been applied in svn; thanks a lot. | A related point is that /usr/lib/libaprutil-1.la is not needed and | should not, IMO, be shipped. But note that deleting that would require | another trivial edit to apu-config, to make --link-libtool say the same | as --link-ld. I did not make that change. Indeed, that'd be nice. ;-) -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: runlevel priority: mysql vs. apache
* Christian Hammers [...] | So as you plan to go to 20 we will have the following? | 19 startmysql | 20 startapache/apache2 | 80 stop apache/apache2 | 81 stop mysql I was planning on keeping the S91 start link, but move the stop link from 91 to 09. I don't think the mysql packages would need adjustment at all for that? Sorry for not being clear about just changing the stop priority, but I don't see a point in changing the start priority. Apache can depend on quite a lot of other services and few services depend on apache being started, so it makes sense for it to start late. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: runlevel priority: mysql vs. apache
* Christian Hammers | Hello Tollef & co | | > > reassign -1 mysql-server | > Bug#377651: stop initscript has wrong priority | > Bug reassigned from package `apache2' to `mysql-server'. | | It's ok for me to move mysql behind apache2 but I notice that apache2 has | a stop priority of 91, which is quite high (the other daemons use the | default of 20). Was there a reason for this? Will it stay there so that | I can use e.g. 92? It'll move to something lower, like 20, yes. As for why it's 91 at the moment, see update-rc.d(8), particularly, the «stop» bit of it. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `-
Bug#376503: severity is critical
clone 376503 -1 reassign -1 mysql-server thanks * Martin Gruner | We had just this situation on one of our servers running a website | that utilizes mysql heavily. During the shutdown process, the | database could not be shut down because the website was still up, | and after the reboot the tables were corrupt. That is why from my | perspective critical is the right severity. That's a bug in mysql, then, feel free to adjust the severity of the new bug, but this one against apache is not a critical bug. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#376503: severity of 376503 is critical, according to developer information
severity 376503 minor thanks * Martin Gruner | severity critical No, it's not critical. It's minor or wishlist unless you can come up with a non-contrived example where it can cause data loss. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: apache2 problem
* nieca-onet [...] | what I'm supoposed to do now? Use a passwordless key? -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#372179: apr-util: FTBFS: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/include/apr-1.0': No such file or directory
* Mohammed Adnène Trojette
| On Wed, Jun 14, 2006, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
| > I can't reproduce this. Where's the build log available?
| >
| > (I also somehow doubt this -- the configure call includes
| > --includedir=\$${prefix}/usr/include/apr-1.0 )
|
| AFAIK, there is already a NMU addressing the issue in DELAYED queue.
There was:
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/DELAYED/2-day $ rm -f libaprutil1* apr-util_1.2.7-1.1*
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/DELAYED/2-day $
(deleted with the uploader's consent. This seems to be a change in
behaviour in autoconf, so I'll probably reassign the bug there.)
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
`. `'
`-
Bug#372179: apr-util: FTBFS: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/include/apr-1.0': No such file or directory
reassign 372179 autoconf retitle 372179 autoconf: AC_CANONICAL_SYSTEM overwrites $@ thanks (I'm leaving the severity of this bug since it causes build failures, feel free to adjust if you disagree.) It seems like the CVS snapshot of autoconf currently in unstable overwrites $@ (it does a set x $ac_cv_target among other things). This causes problems for apr-util since it needs to recover the command line arguments through the APR_PARSE_ARGUMENTS macro. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#372179: apr-util: FTBFS: cannot stat `./debian/tmp/usr/include/apr-1.0': No such file or directory
* Julien Danjou
| There was a problem while autobuilding your package:
[...]
I can't reproduce this. Where's the build log available?
(I also somehow doubt this -- the configure call includes
--includedir=\$${prefix}/usr/include/apr-1.0 )
--
Tollef Fog Heen,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
`. `'
`-
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#373290: libapr0-dev: Outdated header files?
severity 373290 normal tags 373290 + moreinfo thanks * Friedrich Dominicus | Severity: serious Uh? [...] | Could it be that the headers are outdated? I installed the very last | package and I got also the sources from libpar. In the debian package | and the apr_file_info.h header one finds: You're not describing any bug here, and I can't find any package named libpar. If you'd start by telling us what you are seeing, what you expect to be seeing and why you expect to be seeing that, it'd be a useful start. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#341022: Update Please
* Ritesh Raj Sarraf | Why doesn't any one give any update information on this bug ? Because it hasn't been discussed? | I even don't know if it's accepted/rejected. I think it should be rejected, since it's just a way for you to (mis)configure your server. Don't do that, then. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#312252: SuExec FHS compilance
* Philipp Kern | Apache 2 fails to address FHS 2.3 which mandates /srv/www for saving | web pages. No, FHS doesn't say what you think it does: : /srv : Data for services provided by this system : Purpose : : /srv contains site-specific data which is served by this system. : : Rationale : : : [...] : : The methodology used to name subdirectories of /srv is unspecified : as there is currently no consensus on how this should be done. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#303529: Please package mod-apache-snmp
reassign 303529 wnpp retitle 303529 RFP: mod-apache-snmp -- monitor apache via SNMP thanks * Thomas Kruse | Please package mod-apache-snmp. It can be found on the sf.net page: | http://sourceforge.net/projects/mod-apache-snmp/ Hi, the apache team is not responsible for packaging third party modules. I've changed your request into a «Request for Packaging», so any interested Debian Developers can look at it and optionally package it. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#293123: apache: Please add mod_spambot
retitle 293123 RFP: spambot -- prevent unwanted site downloads reassign 293123 wnpp thanks * Nigel Horne | Package: apache | Version: 1.3.33-3 | Severity: wishlist | | Please add mod_spambot to your distribution. It is an add-on module, so it would have to be packaged seperately from apache itself. I've changed your request into a RFP (Request for Package) so somebody might pick it up. The description on http://spambot.sf.net reads as follows (for whoever wants to package this): : Spambot - prevent unwanted site downloads : : Mod_Spambot is an Apache plugin which monitors the data being : downloaded from a server. When the number of requests for a client : exceeds a preset level no more downloads are allowed for a preset : time. When this happens the client received a tailored message : informing them of what has happend. Many of the features can be : tailored to the needs of the webmaster to help to prevent false : positives and to customise the definition of a client to be : blacklisted. : : If a client, that has not been whitelisted, downloads more than 100 : pages in an hour they are blacklisted unless there has been more : than 10 minutes between the downloads. All the figures are : configurable - those values are the defaults. : : The algorithm is simple, but surprisingly effective. No doubt it : will improve with time and feedback. When an IP is blacklisted, it : receives either a bespoke page, or the default 403 ErrorDocument. An : IP is then blacklisted until 10 minutes elapses between : requests. HEAD requests are ignored. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Need to remove and add virtualhosts to start apache
* Adam Rosi-Kessel | This is a very strange, unreproducible problem that occurs frequently | enough that I'm concerned. This sounds like hardware failure. Have you tried running memtest86 on the system? (I saw you said it seems stable otherwise, but I'd check that first.) -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#283396: No need to build conflict on gawk (please move to source)
severity 283396 wishlist thanks * Gianluigi Tiesi | I think there is no need to build-conflict with gawk, | AWK="/usr/bin/mawk" ... configure, seams to be enough, | ad most pkgs depend upong gawk. Most packages don't depend on gawk: : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ > apt-cache showpkg gawk Package: gawk Versions: 1:3.1.4-2(/var/lib/apt/lists/debian.samfundet.no_debian_dists_unstable_main_binary-i386_Packages)(/var/lib/dpkg/status) Reverse Depends: transcode,gawk txt2man,gawk toolchain-source,gawk tla-tools,gawk tla,gawk quilt,gawk openswan,gawk mondo,gawk mindi,gawk man2html,gawk lsb,gawk logwatch,gawk linuxdoc-tools,gawk kdesdk-scripts,gawk jablicator,gawk htdig,gawk guidedog,gawk guarddog,gawk geda-gnetlist,gawk freeswan,gawk education-common,gawk dpkg-awk,gawk 3.0.4 dpkg-awk,gawk cyrus21-common,gawk backupninja,gawk Dependencies: 1:3.1.4-2 - libc6 (2 2.3.2.ds1-4) Provides: 1:3.1.4-2 - awk Reverse Provides: : [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ > -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `-
Re: Question about maintaining the unofficial/parallel apache-lingerd package.
* dean gaudet | On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: | | > As personal opinion I need to agree with Tollef, that apache1.3 is | > basically a dead package and it might get removed from Debian | > after Sarge is released. That means providing only security | > support to it. | | aw... please don't remove 1.3... | | even though i was one of the authors of apache 2.0 i had to give up | on the project after the thing become bloated beyond sanity. i | trust 1.3 and i don't trust 2.0. If somebody steps up to maintain it, then they are free to have it (post sarge). I suspect nobody will, though. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `-
Bug#230419: apache: will not install unless /etc/init.d/apache pre-exists
* David Morse | Tollef Fog Heen wrote: | > * David Morse | abu:/var/cache/apt/archives# dpkg -i | > apache_1.3.26-0woody3_i386.deb | > | (Reading database ... 92942 files and directories currently installed.) | > | Preparing to replace apache 1.3.26-0woody3 (using apache_1.3.26-0woody3_i386.deb) ... | > You are upgrading or reinstalling, it seems? | | I had it installed a long time ago, but as far as I was able to judge, | it uninstalled as cleanly as it was coded to do. You probably ran dpkg --remove and rm -r /etc/apache /etc/init.d/apache. At least that's my guess. | > | Unpacking replacement apache ... | > | Setting up apache (1.3.26-0woody3) ... | > | update-rc.d: /etc/init.d/apache: file does not exist | > | dpkg: error processing apache (--install): | > |subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 ^ | > | Errors were encountered while processing: | > |apache | > Of course not, if you have removed it. It's a conffile. Try | > installing using dpkg -i --force-confmiss | > apache_1.3.26-0woody3_i386.deb . | | Of course it should not overwrite the /etc/init.d/apache. That's not | at all what I was considering a bug. Removing a conffile is also a modification which needs to be preserved. | What I'm complaining about is that, unless /etc/init.d/apache | exists, BEFORE INSTALLING THE DEB, dpkg will error out of the | install. It's the postinst; that's run after the deb is unpacked. I agree that it can be confusing, but it's a feature of dpkg and not something apache can do about it. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `-
Bug#229677: apache2-common: segfault-o-rama with ldap auth
* Wichert Akkerman | Previously Fabio Massimo Di Nitto wrote: | > can you test using apache2 2.0.48 and see if it still happens? | | Still happens with all apache packages at 2.0.48-4 Which mpm module are you using? I wonder if this is the same as #202452. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `-
Re: estimate on new apache2 package release?
* David Kimdon | I would like to get the new subversion package uploaded sooner rather | than later. If you can give me any sort of estimate as to when the | apache2/libapr packages that link with bdb 4.2 will be uploaded that | would be helpful to me. If I receive no more information on a | potential upload date I may end up building new subversion debs and | linking them with bdb 4.1, which I really would rather not do. I broke the package uploaded two days ago, a fixed package should hit incoming today. (It's building now.) -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `-
Bug#225287: libapache-mod-perl: perl 5.8.0-18 packages NOT AVAILABLE
* Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker | I'd very much like to know how to fix this problem at this point. Find the package on snapshot.debian.net. -- Tollef Fog Heen,''`. UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' : `. `' `-
