Bug#340538: followup on this bug?

2006-07-16 Thread Steinar H. Gunderson
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 09:29:20AM +0100, Thom May wrote:
 This is in progress with upstream; we've worked with them to remove zb.c
 from the upstream repository and are working to find a reasonable solution
 to the RSA licensed files.

FWIW, a reasonable usable replacement for the MD5 functions can be found at

  http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=42360

For MD4, you might find the following useful:

  http://trolocsis.com/crypto++/md4_8cpp-source.html
  
I haven't been able to track down the original public domain code it talks
about, though, but it might do -- I'm a bit worried that it doesn't
explicitly say anything about modification, though... 
 
/* Steinar */
-- 
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#340538: followup on this bug?

2006-05-31 Thread Thom May
* Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote :
 This RC bug has been open since November with no maintainer followup
 that I can see. Is anything being done to remove the problimatic files
 and/or get them properly licensed upstream?
 

This is in progress with upstream; we've worked with them to remove zb.c
from the upstream repository and are working to find a reasonable solution
to the RSA licensed files.
Cheers,
-Thom