Processed: this is an update-rc.d bug, really
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 208569 sysv-rc Bug#208569: apache2-mpm-prefork: starts before name server Bug reassigned from package `apache2-mpm-prefork' to `sysv-rc'. retitle 208569 Can't change the startup time via update-rc.d Bug#208569: apache2-mpm-prefork: starts before name server Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Re: Processed: this is an update-rc.d bug, really
reassign 208569 apache2-mpm-prefork thanks On 2003.12.29 16:03, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 208569 sysv-rc Bug#208569: apache2-mpm-prefork: starts before name server Bug reassigned from package `apache2-mpm-prefork' to `sysv-rc'. retitle 208569 Can't change the startup time via update-rc.d Bug#208569: apache2-mpm-prefork: starts before name server Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. It's not a bug, it's a feature. It works exactly as documented. If your package installed the links with the wrong sequence number, it's the responsibility of the package to detect and fix this in the postinst of the new version. This is admittedly not trivial. But it's how it works. Mike.
Processed: Re: Processed: this is an update-rc.d bug, really
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 208569 apache2-mpm-prefork Bug#208569: Can't change the startup time via update-rc.d Bug reassigned from package `sysv-rc' to `apache2-mpm-prefork'. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Bug#208569: Processed: this is an update-rc.d bug, really
* Miquel van Smoorenburg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : It's not a bug, it's a feature. It works exactly as documented. If your package installed the links with the wrong sequence number, it's the responsibility of the package to detect and fix this in the postinst of the new version. This is admittedly not trivial. But it's how it works. Um, eww. Oh well. It'd be nice if in the future you could tell update-rc.d to do it for you - something like: update-rc.d -u name new-seq old-seq and only have update-rc.d do it if the old number matched? Cheers, -Thom
Bug#208569: Processed: this is an update-rc.d bug, really
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 17:24:11, Thom May wrote: * Miquel van Smoorenburg ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote : It's not a bug, it's a feature. It works exactly as documented. If your package installed the links with the wrong sequence number, it's the responsibility of the package to detect and fix this in the postinst of the new version. This is admittedly not trivial. But it's how it works. Um, eww. Oh well. It'd be nice if in the future you could tell update-rc.d to do it for you - something like: update-rc.d -u name new-seq old-seq and only have update-rc.d do it if the old number matched? I'm thinking of adding something like that to update-rc.d, for example a -l flag (list) that shows the current settings for a script, e.g. update-rc.d -l nis would output nis start 19 2 3 4 5 . stop 19 0 1 6 . (why that syntax? That's actually the command line syntax). With that in place you can check for the wrong config and fix it. There are already bugs open against sysvinit requesting something like that. See http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=179210 Mike.
