Re: The status of ITK in Debian
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 06:43:55PM +0100, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: I'm planning to support 2.4, but I won't be able to look at it before next week. Somebody made a forward-port already, but I haven't been able to look at it in detail: http://lists.err.no/pipermail/mpm-itk/2012-February/000497.html My own patch set is out: http://mpm-itk.sesse.net/apache2.4-mpm-itk-2.4.1-pre00/ It should be suitable for experimental. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120314020024.ga22...@uio.no
Re: The status of ITK in Debian
Hi Steinar, On Wednesday 29 February 2012, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 06:29:17PM +0100, Arno Töll wrote: we're close to upload an experimental 2.4 package to Debian. Maybe you could tell us what to do with the ITK MPM? Right now we dropped it completely. Do you have any plans to support 2.4 in time of the approaching freeze? I'm planning to support 2.4, but I won't be able to look at it before next week. Somebody made a forward-port already, but I haven't been able to look at it in detail: http://lists.err.no/pipermail/mpm-itk/2012-February/000497.html There is now mod_privileges included upstream, which does something similar to mpm itk but using Solaris privileges. It would be interesting to check if ITK could use the same hooks and stop being a MPM but become a normal module. Maybe you or one of your fellow developers could have a look at it. Cheers, Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201203022306.47359...@sfritsch.de
Re: The status of ITK in Debian
On Friday 02 March 2012, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:06:47PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: There is now mod_privileges included upstream, which does something similar to mpm itk but using Solaris privileges. It would be interesting to check if ITK could use the same hooks and stop being a MPM but become a normal module. Maybe you or one of your fellow developers could have a look at it. That's interesting -- especially given how intensely Apache upstream has refused mpm-itk for ages and this seems very similar (but less portable). I'll have a look, but I'm pretty sure there won't be anything in time for the freeze; a straight port is what I'm aiming for. I guess upstream has changed, too. But to be honest, Solaris privileges are somewhat more suited to the problem than Linux capabilities: CAP_SETUID means immediate full root privileges but under Solaris, you need to have all privileges to be able to setuid to root. Cheers, Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201203022326.43762...@sfritsch.de
Re: The status of ITK in Debian
On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 11:06:47PM +0100, Stefan Fritsch wrote: There is now mod_privileges included upstream, which does something similar to mpm itk but using Solaris privileges. It would be interesting to check if ITK could use the same hooks and stop being a MPM but become a normal module. Maybe you or one of your fellow developers could have a look at it. That's interesting -- especially given how intensely Apache upstream has refused mpm-itk for ages and this seems very similar (but less portable). I'll have a look, but I'm pretty sure there won't be anything in time for the freeze; a straight port is what I'm aiming for. /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120302221131.ga31...@uio.no
Re: The status of ITK in Debian
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 29.02.2012 18:43, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote: I must admit I haven't picked up the freeze date. Do you have it handy? Debian is going to free in June and we're in a hurry to come up with an experimental package soon, as we need to manage a complex transiton of all reverse dependencies since ABIs changed by switching from 2.2 to 2.4. - -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPTmU5AAoJEMcrUe6dgPNt1QoP/AidpEz/RLn5XaW+da7DQnP6 OYRvoAehKrxEvJM+NBo7HTfqWN7KcjPY6xAWRoCTPIGqEdb5Z4UJfzbG85NnMa/A S5zcq4um248menRlfIfPTlRH7FHDezUKnph1c6X8cTmLG5aztB/7/1R72gFrMEhL UWqLtWyf5RB+kb6yXHemffMzd5B4KCXSFaBvCHhfQchkxST/1K0+wvpgI+txBDje ROrLpCDegvfMn16P+m3EScoT9RL/mUOZvZsJu0pub5v/rWqmNAAACfgxDABEEAvD NgXwB/SKGFX69i+0oJe7kGgNi/cTsxdJ9F5tPAsjrmsneaInfR2FGMM+TVdWXSh3 d6+mZR2PMlTpNN6upqFR8dzWamTzLnwrVYQSTILQVSvU7PazUiYBgePjAFqD8h4h wvG0WRl6eu+kZSAg9msw0BKLv58p7ppE1SBiNdNX3tMIaa+THx6zRGkY48IOMxwP tgiB4eZXrZ80NQXg1xOEOmhFf97Om/1KXn/bHvrxQhSpQiMhAX0HCjTORMIlDx0n fsdBFPTg5LgbujL5IQ1VR8P7VHjWuPzpFlO18b5A6ef309XtaBWlksKWcQQRBIGU oDXWJ8kDfSP77Yqlvclh12ep7of8ohYX4nasUW2LfLITd2D7C7cqPgzQSyFbuvLz MyEwywL+H/9O5fH4poS1 =xn0J -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f4e6539.5030...@toell.net
Re: The status of ITK in Debian
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 06:29:17PM +0100, Arno Töll wrote: we're close to upload an experimental 2.4 package to Debian. Maybe you could tell us what to do with the ITK MPM? Right now we dropped it completely. Do you have any plans to support 2.4 in time of the approaching freeze? I'm planning to support 2.4, but I won't be able to look at it before next week. Somebody made a forward-port already, but I haven't been able to look at it in detail: http://lists.err.no/pipermail/mpm-itk/2012-February/000497.html I must admit I haven't picked up the freeze date. Do you have it handy? /* Steinar */ -- Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-apache-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120229174355.ga29...@uio.no
