Re: Progress on Bug#444271 / N2100 disk performance
On Fri, 2008-05-09 at 22:37 +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Markus Lindenberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-04-24 12:58]: i wonder if there's any progress on this one. i consider this a very limiting issue, as it renders my n2100 almost unusable regarding it's core purpose, being a high performance nas device in a gbit lan. even my slug seems to have a better disk performance. i know i could go back to thecus firmware if that's my main concern, but, you know, that's not an option either for obvious reasons. :-) Still no progress, but I just made 2.6.25 kernels available with the DMA patches applied. This kernel is largely untested, but it includes the same patch from Dan Williams that I tested before and that seems to work. Any feedback is welcome. Use at your own risk. http://merkel.debian.org/~tbm/tmp/n2100/dma/ I've been using this kernel for some time on my N2100 now, and the improvement in disk IO performance is substantial. I'd love to see this merged into lenny's kernel but I realise I should have sent this email a few weeks ago for that to be in any way possible... Ross -- Ross Burton mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://burtonini.com signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Progress on Bug#444271 / N2100 disk performance
Ross Burton wrote: I've been using this kernel for some time on my N2100 now, and the improvement in disk IO performance is substantial. I'd love to see this merged into lenny's kernel but I realise I should have sent this email a few weeks ago for that to be in any way possible... hedges.billgatliff.com/hedges.debian.org is an N2100. Might be another good place to try it out. I don't have root on hedges, and wouldn't use it even if I did--- it's debian's machine, after all. :) But I'm occasionally in physical proximity to the colo center that houses it, if necessary. Or, not. Not my call. :) b.g. -- Bill Gatliff [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Please remove gcl from arm
Camm Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Greetings! There is some segfault on gcl/arm which I cannot correct as agnesi/europa/elara are not allowing access. I don't want this to hold up the gcl programs from lenny, so please remove gcl and its dependencies from arm. If you need me to do an upload with a restricted Architecture: field, please let me know. Binary removals are not done by the release team. Marc -- BOFH #109: The electricity substation in the car park blew up. pgpBmKu8JR2Xp.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Please remove gcl from arm
On Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 11:26:06AM -0400, Camm Maguire wrote: Greetings! There is some segfault on gcl/arm which I cannot correct as agnesi/europa/elara are not allowing access. I don't want this to hold up the gcl programs from lenny, so please remove gcl and its dependencies from arm. Camm, thanks for returning. Latest build of gcl succeeded on smackdown/arm, so I believe gcl/arm removal is now unnecessary: http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=gclarch=armver=2.6.7-42stamp=1217849013file=logas=raw Cheers, Riku signature.asc Description: Digital signature
