Progress bars again

2003-02-24 Thread Martin Sjögren
I've been tinkering with adding progress bars to base-installer, and
it's tricky to say the least.

The info that debootstrap gives when called with --boot-floppies is very
different from the API of the cdebconf progress bars, and I'm sitting
here wondering what would be easiest of
1. changing debootstrap (perhaps add --debian-installer)
2. rewrite parts of base-installer in C, parse the info and convert it
to cdebconf progress bars
3. change the cdebconf progress bars

Yesterday, I tried attacking 2, but I'm kinda stuck. debootstrap
decouples stepping and changing the info, that's merged in cdebconf.
Unlike cdebconf, debootstrap has no concept of starting and stopping the
progress, you'll just get a new upper limit and some current step.

I'm leaning towards 1, since it'd be scary to do 3, but I have no idea
how much work 1 will be.


/Martin


signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signeradmeddelandedel


Newt screenshots

2003-02-24 Thread Martin Sjögren
Now that I found and fixed an evil segfault bug in my newt frontend,
here's some eyecandy ;)

http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/screenshots/2003-02-24/newt/


/Martin

PS: It looks much prettier under bterm + framebuffer


signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signeradmeddelandedel


Running debian-installer within bochs and uml

2003-02-24 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi.

Because I don't have a cdrw burner nor a desire to reboot my computer with the
debian-installer mirror for installing, I've been trying to run debian-installer
within a bochs simulation session and uml.
Bochs is somewhat slow, but the alternative plex86 doesn't seem to support
networking. user-mode-linux doesn't support the mapping block devices as much
AFAIK, so one has to use the ubd devices.

I've made the following observations with bochs, some of which may be bugs (I
didn't check wither they're already reported or were resolved since I've
encountered it, though. I can do this if it's interesting at all.), others of
which will certainly not be bugs, but might be helpful to others who want to try
out debian-installer with bochs.

Then I've tried uml. For that I extended the call in the build/ makefile to the
following:
linux initrd=$(INITRD) root=/dev/rd/0 ramdisk_size=8192 \
   con=fd:0,fd:1 devfs=mount eth0=tuntap,,fe:fd:0:0:0:1,192.168.100.1 \
   ubd0=thedisk.img
thedisk.img being initialized with zeros.
I also found it useful to add a call of reset after the linux call.
I can get to the point where one has to create filesystems and mount partitions
easily, but the debian-installer create fs immediately exits with messages as
shown below.
Creating or creating and mounting the /dev/ubd/0 by hand didn't help me, either,
as I still could not continue the installation of the base system.
If noone else is looking into this, I might try to fiddle with the corresponding
udebs, I'd really like to be able to do some debian-installing without having a
spare computer. (Is there anyone currently using d-i on uml? After all, the
Makefile target is there.)
One of the more important things I was missing was an option to readjust the
priorty threshold for questions.

Cheers

Thomas

Some things I did that might be relevant for others testing d-i with bochs:
In the Bochs configuration:
- enable ne2k, floppy image (might use ro), create tun setup script (you need
  sudo for ifconfig)
- Default disk size isn't good for autopartkit.
- Non-English keyboard (mine is German) may have problems with special chars
  (/,=). '/' is on the numeric keypad, but = isn't. I got around the =
  issue by enabling x11-pc-us.map (us is on purpose) and using the paste option.
  Then, of course, the keyboard layout is funny once a keyboard layout is
  selected in the debian-installer.
- In d-i: ne module needs a param io=0x280, so you need to select questions of
  low priority

Some things with debian-installer itself:
- Observations: =,/ for German keyboards
  - should keyboard table be loaded before network init?
- Messages=Medium: ne doesn't prompt for parameters, not installable
  should prompt me the second time around (similar to tfh's issue with
  autodetection)
- Along the same deal: Invalid installation source: users should be abler to
  eenter server instead of just retreiver when loading fails
- Download percentage is nan% (Maybe this is the lack of a FPU.)
- Locale has the choices (nb|nn|si)_NO|lv_LV ?
- Install base system doesn't succeed:
  [...]
  P: 46 47 Extracting packages
  I: Extracting /var/cache/apt/archives/whiptail_0.50.17-9.6_i386.deb...
  P: 47 47 Extracting packages
  I: Extracting /var/cache/apt/archives/mbr_1.1.5-1_i386.deb...
  P: 1 40 Installing base system
  I: Installing core packages...
  P: 2 40
  base-installer's postinst exited with status 256
  installer[46]: Setting main menu question priority to critical
  Debian Installer Main Menu
  [...]
- It stalled at the installing a kernel step.
  Don't really know what caused this.



 11. Create a file system
Prompt: 1 - 18 11
Debian Installer Main Menu

Choose a configuration step
This configuration step requires one or more configuration steps that have not
yet been performed. Please select a configuration step to continue.
  1. Automatically Partition Hard Drives (unsafe) (default)
  2. I have already partitioned the hard drive
  3. Partition a hard drive
Prompt: 1 - 3 2
Warning: start=2 - this looks like a partition rather than
the entire disk. Using fdisk on it is probably meaningless.
[Use the --force option if you really want this]
di-utils-mkfs's postinst exited with status 5120
installer[42]: Setting main menu question priority to critical
Debian Installer Main Menu

Similar for Mount a Partition
or after
# mkdir /target
# mount /dev/ubd/0 /target -t ext2
Prompt: 1 - 18 13
Debian Installer Main Menu

Choose a configuration step
This configuration step requires one or more configuration steps that have not
yet been performed. Please select a configuration step to continue.
  1. Automatically Partition Hard Drives (unsafe) (default)
  2. I have already mounted the partitions
  3. Mount a partition
Prompt: 1 - 3 2
cp: /target/etc/fstab: No such file or directory
base-installer's postinst exited with status 256
installer[42]: Setting main menu question priority to critical
Debian Installer Main Menu




pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP 

debian-boot@lists.debian.org

2003-02-24 Thread John Hartnup
Hi,

I've just installed Debian on a Toshiba Libretto 50CT. It's the first
time I've installed Debian on any system, and I've very impressed by
the flexibility of the install system.

However I think I stumbled on some sort of problem with the PCMCIA support.

Linux can't use the Libretto's floppy, so I was booting from images on the
Windows filesystem using boot.bat, and using drivers.tgz as a source of
drivers, before completing the install using HTTP.

Simply using the installer interface, the PCMCIA initialisation stage
failed every time -- I tried this with all the flavours of boot image.

In the end, and for no rational reason, I untarred drivers.tgz into
/target/mods, and blithely ran install.sh from the archive, not really knowing
what it did. After doing that, the PCMCIA initialisation worked first time, and
I could complete the install with no further problems.

Hope this is useful,

John

-- 

He wasn't even a puppy -- he had a glandular problem



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Newt screenshots

2003-02-24 Thread Martin Sjögren
mån 2003-02-24 klockan 14.39 skrev Martin Sjögren:

 PS: It looks much prettier under bterm + framebuffer

After a lot of hacking (you don't want to know what my build/Makefile
looks like right now), here's a screenshot showing what it can look
like. This needs a lot more work, but at least it seems feasible.

http://people.debian.org/~sjogren/d-i/screenshots/2003-02-24/newt+i18n.png


/Martin


signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signeradmeddelandedel


Ciao Stella

2003-02-24 Thread Marianna
un bacio


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Running debian-installer within bochs and uml

2003-02-24 Thread Matt Kraai
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
  11. Create a file system
 Prompt: 1 - 18 11
 Debian Installer Main Menu
 
 Choose a configuration step
 This configuration step requires one or more configuration steps that have not
 yet been performed. Please select a configuration step to continue.
   1. Automatically Partition Hard Drives (unsafe) (default)
   2. I have already partitioned the hard drive
   3. Partition a hard drive
 Prompt: 1 - 3 2
 Warning: start=2 - this looks like a partition rather than
 the entire disk. Using fdisk on it is probably meaningless.
 [Use the --force option if you really want this]
 di-utils-mkfs's postinst exited with status 5120
 installer[42]: Setting main menu question priority to critical
 Debian Installer Main Menu
 
 Similar for Mount a Partition
 or after
 # mkdir /target
 # mount /dev/ubd/0 /target -t ext2
 Prompt: 1 - 18 13
 Debian Installer Main Menu
 
 Choose a configuration step
 This configuration step requires one or more configuration steps that have not
 yet been performed. Please select a configuration step to continue.
   1. Automatically Partition Hard Drives (unsafe) (default)
   2. I have already mounted the partitions
   3. Mount a partition
 Prompt: 1 - 3 2
 cp: /target/etc/fstab: No such file or directory
 base-installer's postinst exited with status 256
 installer[42]: Setting main menu question priority to critical
 Debian Installer Main Menu

base-installer requires /target/etc/fstab to exist, so you'll have to
create one.

Matt
-- 
Oink!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Running debian-installer within bochs and uml

2003-02-24 Thread Matt Kraai
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
[snip all manner of d-i bugs]

Would you please file a bug report for each problem against the
appropriate package?  You can assign them to the install
pseudo-package if you don't know which package is responsible?

Matt
-- 
Oink!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Running debian-installer within bochs and uml

2003-02-24 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Matt Kraai wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
 Would you please file a bug report for each problem against the
 appropriate package?  You can assign them to the install
 pseudo-package if you don't know which package is responsible?

I'd really prefer doing some more research on most of this. (E.g. on you
screenshots, there is a en_US locale option.)
Also, there are things that are more design decisions than bugs. For example, no
parameter prompt at default is not a problem when there is an option to increase
the number of questions asked. On the other hand, that option is not needed when
there is an automatic escalation per configuration question. (I think the latter
has been discussed at least for individual configuration questions on the list.)

On the other hand, if you prefer starting this discussion with a bug report,
I'll gladly get busy filing them.

Cheers

Thomas


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Running debian-installer within bochs and uml

2003-02-24 Thread Matt Kraai
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 06:22:23PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
 Matt Kraai wrote:
  On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:21:12PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
  Would you please file a bug report for each problem against the
  appropriate package?  You can assign them to the install
  pseudo-package if you don't know which package is responsible?
 
 I'd really prefer doing some more research on most of this. (E.g. on you
 screenshots, there is a en_US locale option.)

It's a bug for some people (e.g., you).

 Also, there are things that are more design decisions than bugs. For example, no
 parameter prompt at default is not a problem when there is an option to increase
 the number of questions asked. On the other hand, that option is not needed when
 there is an automatic escalation per configuration question. (I think the latter
 has been discussed at least for individual configuration questions on the list.)

The problem report is still valuable, even if the solution is still
under dispute.

 On the other hand, if you prefer starting this discussion with a bug report,
 I'll gladly get busy filing them.

Bug reports are less likely to be forgotten, thus more likely to be
fixed.

Matt
-- 
Oink!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



How I want languagechooser to behave

2003-02-24 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen

I find the current languagechooser complex and non-intuitive.  To make
sure everyone know where I want it to move, I wrote down a little
description on where I want the package to move.  I know we have been
discussing these things lately, so I thought this was good time to get
something down in writing.  Here is the current README.  Any comments.
Is this a good idea?


debian-installer language chooser
=

This package should behava as follows:

  0. extract available languages from list of available locales
 (mapping language code - language name)

  1. present list of language names, and ask the user to pick one.

  2. if the language is available in several regions (maps to several
 locales), ask which region / language variant to use.  (allow
 user to [back] off to the language list.

  3. pass the locale information on to the parts that needs it.

Based on this information a locale is selected.  This locale maps to
one language, one region, a priority list of fallback languages, and a
default keyboard layout.

The language code is passed into cdebconf.  The locale and priority
list of languages is passed to base-config/termwrap as LANG_INST and
LANGUAGE_INST in /target/root/dbootstrap_settings.  The 

For each supported locale, the following information must be
available:

  - language code (part of locale)
  - country code (part of locale)
  - priority list of fallback languages to use as translations
  - default keymap to use


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#180032: choose-mirror: Error message for failure

2003-02-24 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Followup-For: Bug #180032
Package: choose-mirror
Version: N/A; reported 2003-02-24

Maybe it's nice to see the actual error message. I get the following.
After that, the mirror's name is the empty string.

Cheers

Thomas

...
 49. Turkey
 50. Ukraine
 51. United States
 52. enter information manually (default)
Prompt: 1 - 52 52
/home/martin/projects/debian-installer/tools/cdebconf/src/frontend.c:16
(frontend_add):
/home/martin/projects/debian-installer/tools/cdebconf/src/frontend.c:16
(frontend_add): Assertion failed: q-next == NULL
choose-mirror's postinst exited with status 36096
installer[42]: Setting main menu question priority to critical

Debian Installer Main Menu


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


SV: loop: can't get info on device

2003-02-24 Thread Åke Wivänge
  I used a SBM floppy to boot from the CD. The sbm floppy image came
from
  the Debian CD.
 
  I tried to boot from a rescue floppy / root floppy (images from the
  Debian CD) and then installed from the CD - same result.
 
  I've also burned a new CD in case something went wrong - same
result...
 
 Well, in that case I'd say either the CD image is corrupt, or you
 happened to trigger a rare bug in some way. Did you verify the CD's
 md5sum?

I'm probably doing something very wrong here, I tried to verify the CD
with md5sum.exe (that came on the CD) And it complained about virtually
everything, So I downloaded another iso-image from another (official)
source - same result.

I running it like this:

Cd f: (where my CD is)
C:\md5sum.exe -c md5sum.txt

I've tried both a real CD and a simulated one using deamon tools.

It responds:
C:\md5sum.exe: MD5 check failed for './files'

For what I guess is every file in the md5sum.txt filelist.

I'm feeling stupid - what am I doing wrong???

\Åke



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#180032: choose-mirror: Error message for failure

2003-02-24 Thread Martin Sjögren
mån 2003-02-24 klockan 20.59 skrev Thomas Viehmann:
 Followup-For: Bug #180032
 Package: choose-mirror
 Version: N/A; reported 2003-02-24
 
 Maybe it's nice to see the actual error message. I get the following.
 After that, the mirror's name is the empty string.

I don't see how these bug reports are related at all. Isn't this more of
a cdebconf issue? It fails and everything goes boom. I think you should
report this on cdebconf instead.


/Martin


signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signeradmeddelandedel


Bug#180032: choose-mirror: Error message for failure

2003-02-24 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi.

Martin Sjögren wrote:
 I don't see how these bug reports are related at all. Isn't this more of
 a cdebconf issue? It fails and everything goes boom. I think you should
 report this on cdebconf instead.
Like the submitter, I had a problem with the download mirror and tried to change it.
From the original bugreport I figured that he had got back to the main menu.
Also, like him and you, I believe that this is probably a cdebconf problem.

So to me it looked as it was the same bug, that's why I didn't file a new one.
(I can do so, though, if you prefer.) It probably needs to be reassigned.
However, I don't think I'm qualified to reassign this bug. Sorry for not
pointing this out more clearly.

Cheers

Thomas


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


commits of new di-utils-*

2003-02-24 Thread Thorsten Sauter

Hi all,

I plan to commit the new/rewriten di-utils-* in the next few hours.

This is a short list of the changes:
- all packages use generic functions from new di-utils-generic pkg
- partitioner/mkfs/mkswap use /proc/partitions to get
  also lvm/raid/... devices
- package for creating swapspace
- di-utils-mount-partitions generates final fstab file
- plan for external functions for each architecture (better arch
  independ)
- warning/error messages if something get wrong


Some packages are new and not yet uploaded to the debian archives, so
please build all di-utils packages from cvs sources.

Please test it... :-)

Bye
Thorsten

-- 
Thorsten Sauter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

(Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?)



pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#182349: anna: Should reload packages file if something went wrong last time

2003-02-24 Thread Martin Sjögren
severity 182349 wishlist
thanks

Just correcting the speeling :)

mån 2003-02-24 klockan 21.09 skrev Thomas Viehmann:
 Package: anna
 Version: N/A; reported 2003-02-24
 Severity: whishlist
 
 I think it would often be preferable if anna (i.e. menu option Load installer
 modules) would reload package files if called for the second time.
 (However, please feel free to close this bug if you disagree.)

First I thought you meant the Packages files that are downloaded and
parsed, but then I guess you meant the actual packages? :)

How do I detect the difference between Oops, I forgot a package, let's
go get it and Damn, package X isn't working, I'd better download it
again? I could always *ask*, but I want to minimize the number of
questions asked.

Keep also in mind that packages that are downloaded are verified by
their md5 checksums and I doubt that a re-download will improve the
situation. If you have truly fucked up something, I think a reboot is
better anyway.


/Martin

PS: Why maintonly?


signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signeradmeddelandedel


Processed: Re: Bug#182349: anna: Should reload packages file if something went wrong last time

2003-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 severity 182349 wishlist
Bug#182349: anna: Should reload packages file if something went wrong last time
Severity set to `wishlist'.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



modcont-file and its generation

2003-02-24 Thread Norman Schmidt
Hi folks!

Could anybody tell me what the modcont file should contain exactly (or 
point me to documentation)?

I think that the part of kernel.sh of boot-floppies-3.0.24 that 
generates it doesn´t work as it should, but before I file a bug I would 
like to know what should be in the modcont file.

My actual problem:
My first line of the generated modcont looks like the following:
dir_content_kernel=boot control.tar.gz data.tar.gz debian-binary 
kernel-image-2.4.20-bf2.4raid_2.4.20bes_i386.deb lib usr  

This was done with the following script (which is derived from 
btf/kernel.sh of boot-floppies 3.0.24): $subarch=, $extractdir is the 
directory in which the kernel-image was unarred and data.tar.gz 
ungztarred (the original file ist still there and shows):

info creating module contents file, 'modcont$subarch'
(cd $extractdir;
for i in lib/modules/*/*; do
if [ -d  $i ]; then
echo -n dir_content_`basename $i`=\;
for j in $i/*.o; do
echo -n `basename $j .o`   ;
done ;
echo \ ;
fi ;
done
)  modcont$subarch
The next (pcmcia) line looks right:

dir_content_pcmcia=3c574_cs  3c589_cs  aha152x_cs  aironet4500_cs 
axnet_cs  com20020_cs  ds  fdomain_cs  fmvj18x_cs  i82092  i82365 
ibmtr_cs  netwave_cs  nmclan_cs  nsp_cs  pcmcia_core  pcnet_cs 
qlogic_cs  ray_cs  serial_cs  smc91c92_cs  synclink_cs  tcic  wavelan_cs 
 xirc2ps_cs  xircom_cb  xircom_tulip_cb  yenta_socket  

The difference is that in the pcmcia directory, there are only direct 
links to module object files, while in the kernel directory, there are 
only subdirs.

Thanks, Norman.
--
--
Norman Schmidt  Institut für Physikal. u. Theoret. Chemie
cand. chem. Friedrich-Alexander-Universitaet
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Erlangen-Nuernberg
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Bug#182349: anna: Should reload packages file if something went wrong last time

2003-02-24 Thread Matt Kraai
severity 182349 wishlist
thanks

On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 09:09:38PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
 I think it would often be preferable if anna (i.e. menu option Load installer
 modules) would reload package files if called for the second time.
 (However, please feel free to close this bug if you disagree.)

What problem this fix?

Matt
-- 
Oink!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#182349: anna: Should reload packages file if something went wrong last time

2003-02-24 Thread Thomas Viehmann
[Sorry, forgot the bug cc in my first post.]

Matt Kraai wrote:
[anna reloading package files]
 What problem this fix?
One gets invalid packages files every so often (e.g. during mirror update).
However, probably whishlist is better.

Cheers

Thomas



pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


ext3 problems

2003-02-24 Thread Cardenas
I recently installed from tfheen's netinst floppy successfully on a
dell c610 laptop. 

Unfortunately, I selected ext3 the first time for my file
system. Apparently the kernel on the floppy doesn't have ext3 support,
and as a result the lilo postinst failed, and upon first boot, the
root partition could not be mounted. 

As a workaround, I installed with ext2, but we need to fix this. 

Also, I don't think that the list of extra packages to install should
be part of the default priority level. That's the only really
bewildering thing to your average person in the default install. 

thanks and great work everyone!

  cardenas

-- 
michael cardenas   | lead software engineer, lindows.com
hyperpoem.net  | GNU/Linux software developer
people.debian.org/~mbc | encrypted email preferred

We, the men of the mind, are now on strike against you in the name of
 a single axiom, which is the root of our moral code, just as the root
 of yours is the wish to escape it: the axiom that existence exists.
- Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: debian-installer status 2003-02-21

2003-02-24 Thread Cardenas
On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 11:32:36AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
 * Larry Gilbert 
 
 | Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
 |Also, having somebody with a good touch for English to go
 |through the templates would be nice.
 | 
 | I wouldn't mind helping with this, but I can't seem to figure out how
 | to check out debian-installer from the CVS server (using
 | -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvs/debian-installer gives me
 | /cvs/debian-installer: no such repository).  And once I do so, I'm
 | not sure I'll know where the templates are. :-)
 
 Look at http://raw.no/d-i/getting_started.html for some information on
 getting started.
 

there's also http://people.debian.org/~mbc/di.html which I will be
updating with the new status soon. 

-- 
michael cardenas   | lead software engineer, lindows.com
hyperpoem.net  | GNU/Linux software developer
people.debian.org/~mbc | encrypted email preferred

Are you seeking to know what is wrong with the world? All the
disasters that have wrecked your world, came from your leaders'
attempt to avoid the fact that A is A.
- Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Bug#182045: No framebuffer?

2003-02-24 Thread Cardenas
On Sun, Feb 23, 2003 at 12:35:09PM +0100, Martin Sj?gren wrote:
 l?r 2003-02-22 klockan 21.54 skrev Herbert Xu:
  On Sat, Feb 22, 2003 at 05:03:19PM +0100, Martin Sj?gren wrote:
   Package: kernel-image-2.4.20-386-udeb
   Version: 2.4.20-4
   
   I can't get any framebuffer running in debian-installer. Now, I don't
   know much about this, but I guess the problem is that the vga and vesa
   framebuffers are compiled as modules and not included in the kernel?
   
   It would be nice to get a framebuffer running so we can get proper
   unicode i18n working.

We're going to need framebuffer support for libdirectfb-gtk as well. 

  
  Both them work as modules.  Would you like one modules package containing
  them both or two separate ones?
 
 Uhm, I don't really know much about this... Say I have vesafb as a
 module, how and when do I get the framebuffer running?
 

Unfortunately, I don't know much either, and our packages are still
in an early state. 



-- 
michael cardenas   | lead software engineer, lindows.com
hyperpoem.net  | GNU/Linux software developer
people.debian.org/~mbc | encrypted email preferred

Neither despair nor joy seems justified before this sky and the 
 shining suffocating heat pouring down from it.
- Albert Camus


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#182349: anna: Should reload packages file if something went wrong last time

2003-02-24 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Martin Sjögren wrote:
 Just correcting the speeling :)
Please excuse my lack of attention.

 First I thought you meant the Packages files that are downloaded and
 parsed, but then I guess you meant the actual packages? :)
No. I meant the Packages file.

 PS: Why maintonly?
As both Matt and you noted, it's best filed as a whishlist bug. I had a normal
first, then remembered to correct the To for whishlist, but forgot to actually
change the severity pseudo header. (Filing bugs while cooking...)

Cheers

Thomas




pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#182349: anna: Should reload packages file if something went wrong last time

2003-02-24 Thread Matt Kraai
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:13:20PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
 Matt Kraai wrote:
 [anna reloading package files]
  What problem this fix?

I missing a verb.

 One gets invalid packages files every so often (e.g. during mirror update).

The Packages file lists packages that have not been mirrored yet?  If
so, how would downloading it again help?

Matt
-- 
Oink!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#182357: choose-mirror: Error message for failure

2003-02-24 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Package: choose-mirror
Version: N/A; reported 2003-02-24
Severity: Normal

I get this

/home/martin/projects/debian-installer/tools/cdebconf/src/frontend.c:16 (fronten
d_add): /home/martin/projects/debian-installer/tools/cdebconf/src/frontend.c:16
(frontend_add): Assertion failed: q-next == NULL
choose-mirror's postinst exited with status 36096

when I'm trying to revise my choice of mirror.
Below is something like a log / instructions how to get there.
(BTW: Is there a log? Oh, well cut and paste from uml is good enough.)

Cheers

Thomas

  2. Configure the network via DHCP
Prompt: 1 - 6 2
For example, this question is of medium priority, and if your priority were
already 'high' or 'critical', you wouldn't see this question.
  4. low
Prompt: 1 - 4 4
...
  4. Choose mirror to install from
Prompt: 1 - 6 4
Download files using what protocol?
  1. http (default)
Prompt: 1 - 2 1
Choose mirror
 52. enter information manually
Prompt: 1 - 52 52
Then: 192.168.100.1 /debuan
  4. Choose mirror to install from
Prompt: 1 - 6 4
Download files using what protocol?
  1. http (default)
Prompt: 1 - 2 1
Choose mirror
 52. enter information manually (default)
Prompt: 1 - 52 52
/home/martin/projects/debian-installer/tools/cdebconf/src/frontend.c:16 (fronten
d_add): /home/martin/projects/debian-installer/tools/cdebconf/src/frontend.c:16
(frontend_add): Assertion failed: q-next == NULL
choose-mirror's postinst exited with status 36096
installer[42]: Setting main menu question priority to critical

Debian Installer Main Menu



pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Processed: retitle 180038 mishandles comma in package description

2003-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 retitle 180038 mishandles comma in package description
Bug#180038: install: downloading modules menu has to long entries
Changed Bug title.

 --
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ext3 problems

2003-02-24 Thread Matt Kraai
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:35:24PM -0800, Cardenas wrote:
 Unfortunately, I selected ext3 the first time for my file
 system. Apparently the kernel on the floppy doesn't have ext3 support,
 and as a result the lilo postinst failed, and upon first boot, the
 root partition could not be mounted. 

I have installed with ext3 and LILO.  What was the error message?

 Also, I don't think that the list of extra packages to install should
 be part of the default priority level. That's the only really
 bewildering thing to your average person in the default install. 

During the Load installer modules step?  Please file a bug against
anna.

Matt
-- 
Oink!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#180032: marked as done (choose-mirror: Can't change mirror if first one doesn't work)

2003-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated 24 Feb 2003 22:19:42 +0100
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#180032: choose-mirror: Error message for failure
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2003 18:50:27 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Feb 06 12:50:26 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from pieck.student.uva.nl [146.50.96.22] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18gr6Q-Dr-00; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 12:50:26 -0600
Received: from baardmijt ([146.50.160.23]) by
  pieck.student.uva.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP
  id H9WHO100.J12 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 6 Feb 2003
  19:50:25 +0100 
Received: from roodbaard ([192.168.13.2])
by baardmijt with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 18gr6N-0001MW-00; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 19:50:23 +0100
Received: from tdykstra by roodbaard with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18gr6N-9X-00; Thu, 06 Feb 2003 19:50:23 +0100
From: Tim Dijkstra (tdykstra) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: choose-mirror: Can't change mirror if first one doesn't work
X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2003 19:50:23 +0100
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: Tim Dijkstra [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: choose-mirror
Version: N/A; reported 2003-02-06
Severity: normal

I'm not really sure if this is a bug in this package or rather in
the one that generates the menu of the installer... but here goes.

Somewhere in the process of installing I was asked to choose a mirror. It
turned out that the one I chose didn't work. After that I couldn't
try another one, none of the menu-entries would let me do that. That is
of course really annoying.

grts Tim

-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux roodbaard 2.4.20 #1 di jan 14 22:17:08 CET 2003 i686
Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---
Received: (at 180032-close) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Feb 2003 21:19:49 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 24 15:19:48 2003
Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from smtp.gu.se [130.241.150.66] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18nQ0p-0005vP-00; Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:19:47 -0600
Received: from sjogren.ostkupan.studenthem.gu.se (sjogren.ostkupan.studenthem.gu.se 
[193.11.232.159])
by smtp.gu.se (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h1OLJkXO025691;
Mon, 24 Feb 2003 22:19:46 +0100
Subject: Re: Bug#180032: choose-mirror: Error message for failure
From: Martin =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sj=F6gren?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Thomas Viehmann [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; 
boundary==-xXeN8WHz5mEmFmcu6tsx
Organization: 
Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 
Date: 24 Feb 2003 22:19:42 +0100
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
  SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level: 


--=-xXeN8WHz5mEmFmcu6tsx
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

m=E5n 2003-02-24 klockan 21.58 skrev Thomas Viehmann:
 Hi.
=20
 Martin Sj=F6gren wrote:
  I don't see how these bug reports are related at all. Isn't this more o=
f
  a cdebconf issue? It fails and everything goes boom. I think you should
  report this on cdebconf instead.
 Like the submitter, I had a problem with the download mirror and tried to=
 change it.
 From the original bugreport I figured that he had got back to the main m=
enu.
 Also, like him and you, I believe that this is probably a cdebconf proble=
m.

This is solved anyway, since I uploaded a new choose-mirror that has its
own menu entry. Too bad I'd forgotten about this bug so it isn't in the
changelog. I'm closing it now instead.

 So to me it looked as it was the same bug, that's why I didn't file a new=
 one.
 (I can do so, though, if you prefer.) It probably needs to be reassigned.
 However, I don't think I'm qualified to reassign this bug. Sorry for not
 

Bug#182349: anna: Should reload packages file if something went wrong last time

2003-02-24 Thread Martin Sjögren
mån 2003-02-24 klockan 22.17 skrev Thomas Viehmann:
 One gets invalid packages files every so often (e.g. during mirror update).
 However, probably whishlist is better.

Well, even if the Packages files aren't verified for integrity right
now, they will be as soon as Release file support is added (which is
waiting for the archive to adapt the Release file :P).

Also, how will it help to get a new Packages file right again, won't it
be just as broken?


/Martin


signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signeradmeddelandedel


Re: How I want languagechooser to behave

2003-02-24 Thread Denis Barbier
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 08:01:05PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
[...]
 This package should behava as follows:
 
   0. extract available languages from list of available locales
  (mapping language code - language name)

I disagree, there is no reason to propose languages which have no
translated templates.

   1. present list of language names, and ask the user to pick one.

   2. if the language is available in several regions (maps to several
  locales), ask which region / language variant to use.  (allow
  user to [back] off to the language list.

Why don't merge 1 and 2 into a single list?

   3. pass the locale information on to the parts that needs it.
 
 Based on this information a locale is selected.  This locale maps to one
 language, one region, a priority list of fallback languages,

Does this mean that LANGUAGE is fully determined by this locale, or can
it be edited?

 and a default keyboard layout.

Shouldn't keyboard layout be handled by kbd-chooser?

 The language code is passed into cdebconf.  The locale and priority
 list of languages is passed to base-config/termwrap as LANG_INST and
 LANGUAGE_INST in /target/root/dbootstrap_settings.  The 

Ok.

 For each supported locale, the following information must be
 available:
 
   - language code (part of locale)
   - country code (part of locale)
   - priority list of fallback languages to use as translations
   - default keymap to use

Denis


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: ext3 problems

2003-02-24 Thread Cardenas
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 02:04:37PM -0800, Matt Kraai wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 01:35:24PM -0800, Cardenas wrote:
  Unfortunately, I selected ext3 the first time for my file
  system. Apparently the kernel on the floppy doesn't have ext3 support,
  and as a result the lilo postinst failed, and upon first boot, the
  root partition could not be mounted. 
 
 I have installed with ext3 and LILO.  What was the error message?
 

the error was a segfault in the postinst, but I wrote it down and let
it in some other pants... I'll look for it tonight...

  Also, I don't think that the list of extra packages to install should
  be part of the default priority level. That's the only really
  bewildering thing to your average person in the default install. 
 
 During the Load installer modules step?  Please file a bug against
 anna.

will do. 

-- 
michael cardenas   | lead software engineer, lindows.com
hyperpoem.net  | GNU/Linux software developer
people.debian.org/~mbc | encrypted email preferred

Promote decentralization
- The Good Guys


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#182349: anna: Should reload packages file if something went wrong last time

2003-02-24 Thread Matt Kraai
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:56:35PM +0100, Martin Sj?gren wrote:
 m?n 2003-02-24 klockan 22.17 skrev Thomas Viehmann:
  One gets invalid packages files every so often (e.g. during mirror update).
  However, probably whishlist is better.
 
 Well, even if the Packages files aren't verified for integrity right
 now, they will be as soon as Release file support is added (which is
 waiting for the archive to adapt the Release file :P).
 
 Also, how will it help to get a new Packages file right again, won't it
 be just as broken?

I think the problem is an out-of-sync, not a corrupted, Packages file.
Downloading the new version, which will match the new Release file,
should work.

Matt
-- 
Oink!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#182349: anna: Should reload packages file if something went wrong last time

2003-02-24 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Matt Kraai wrote:
 On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 10:13:20PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann wrote:
 The Packages file lists packages that have not been mirrored yet?  If
 so, how would downloading it again help?
If the Packages gets updated after the packages.
The downloaded Packages file can list packages that have been replaced by newer
versions, the old ones ceasing to be available.
Then a reload (after the Packages file has been adjusted) helps.

Cheers

Thomas



pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#182349: anna: Should reload packages file if something went wrong last time

2003-02-24 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Martin Sjögren wrote:
One gets invalid packages files every so often (e.g. during mirror update).
However, probably whishlist is better.
 Well, even if the Packages files aren't verified for integrity right
 now, they will be as soon as Release file support is added (which is
 waiting for the archive to adapt the Release file :P).
Then, if it won't let me redownload the release file when something doesn't
match the release file, I shall file another bug.
(d-i seems to be very strict with me when it comes to order of things...)

 Also, how will it help to get a new Packages file right again, won't it
 be just as broken?
The order in which the mirrors take actions doesn't seem to be particulary
predictable. So really, if something in the chain
Release.gpg-Release-Packages-.*\.u?debs fails, one should start from the
beginning, presently this is the Packages file.

The concrete incident that caused me to file the bug was somewhat artificial,
however, I see things like this from time to time when updating my mirror.

Cheers

Thomas


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Processed: choose-mirror fails when called for the second time

2003-02-24 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 retitle 182357 choose-mirror fails when called for the second time
Bug#182357: choose-mirror: Error message for failure
Changed Bug title.


End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#182357: choose-mirror fails when called for the second time

2003-02-24 Thread Thomas Viehmann
retitle 182357 choose-mirror fails when called for the second time


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: How I want languagechooser to behave

2003-02-24 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Denis Barbier]
 I disagree, there is no reason to propose languages which have no
 translated templates.

Actually, I use this information to also set the default language in
KDE and GNOME, as well as the default dictionary in ispell.  But there
is no reason to list _all_ languages available, but that was implicit
in my suggestion, as the list of available locales do not need to be
complete (ie. the same as the one in glibc/locales).

 Why don't merge 1 and 2 into a single list?

To make the language list shorter, and less confusing.  I guess the
lists could be combined into one list.  We will have to test and see
which presentation is best for new users.  (Old users will cope with
both approaches.

 Does this mean that LANGUAGE is fully determined by this locale, or
 can it be edited?

I want it to be fully determined by the locale, and do not see the
need to edit it manually.  Do you think the first time users need to
edit this list of fallback translations?

 and a default keyboard layout.
 
 Shouldn't keyboard layout be handled by kbd-chooser?

Sure.  But the default should be updated based on the choosen locale.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#182349: anna: Should reload packages file if something went wrong last time

2003-02-24 Thread Martin Sjögren
mån 2003-02-24 klockan 23.05 skrev Thomas Viehmann:
 If the Packages gets updated after the packages.
 The downloaded Packages file can list packages that have been replaced by newer
 versions, the old ones ceasing to be available.
 Then a reload (after the Packages file has been adjusted) helps.

Really, I still don't see the problem. If the Packages file points to
files that aren't downloadable, anna will freak and obviously can't
install them. Then you can select anna from the menu again. The Packages
files are always downloaded, and udebs are selected for installation
based on

1) if priority = standard
2) if a udeb to-be-installed depends on it
3) if it's selected in the multiselect
4) it is not already installed

Where is this failing? Are you saying that you want an eplicit way to
re-install this already installed package?


/Martin


signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signeradmeddelandedel


Re: cvs commit to debian-installer/utils/debian by tsauter

2003-02-24 Thread Denis Barbier
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 03:36:53PM -0700, Debian Boot CVS Master wrote:
 Repository: debian-installer/utils/debian
 who:tsauter
 time:   Mon Feb 24 15:36:53 MST 2003
 Log Message:
   Update templates for new scripts.
   
 
 Files:
 changed:di-utils-choose_medium.templates di-utils-mkfs.templates 
 di-utils-mount-partitions.templates di-utils-partitioner.templates 
 di-utils-shell.templates

Please run debconf-updatepo after editing templates files.

Denis


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#182349: anna: Should reload packages file if something went wrong last time

2003-02-24 Thread Matt Kraai
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 12:01:53AM +0100, Martin Sj?gren wrote:
 m?n 2003-02-24 klockan 23.05 skrev Thomas Viehmann:
  If the Packages gets updated after the packages.
  The downloaded Packages file can list packages that have been replaced by newer
  versions, the old ones ceasing to be available.
  Then a reload (after the Packages file has been adjusted) helps.
 
 Really, I still don't see the problem. If the Packages file points to
 files that aren't downloadable, anna will freak and obviously can't
 install them. Then you can select anna from the menu again. The Packages
 files are always downloaded, and udebs are selected for installation
 based on

When you rerun anna, you will not get the new Packages file.  The
net retriever uses the -c option to wget, which will only append
to the existing file.

 Where is this failing? Are you saying that you want an eplicit way to
 re-install this already installed package?

anna should unlink the Packages file before redownloading to
ensure that we retrieve the latest version.  This isn't a problem
for udebs because their contents don't change.

Matt
-- 
Oink!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#182349: anna: Should reload packages file if something went wrong last time

2003-02-24 Thread Martin Sjögren
tis 2003-02-25 klockan 00.25 skrev Matt Kraai:
 When you rerun anna, you will not get the new Packages file.  The
 net retriever uses the -c option to wget, which will only append
 to the existing file.
 
  Where is this failing? Are you saying that you want an eplicit way to
  re-install this already installed package?
 
 anna should unlink the Packages file before redownloading to
 ensure that we retrieve the latest version.  This isn't a problem
 for udebs because their contents don't change.

Are we talking about the same thing at all? anna removes the Packages
file after parsing it:

unlink(DOWNLOAD_DIR /Packages);

I guess if it fails mid-download you might have an incomplete Packages
file still there. In that case, I think this is something that should be
changed in net-retriever.


/Martin


signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signeradmeddelandedel


Re: How I want languagechooser to behave

2003-02-24 Thread Alastair McKinstry

On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 23:33, Denis Barbier wrote:
 Hi, you did not send your message to debian-boot, do you want to post
 it again, or do you want me to reply there?
 

Sorry. Late night. I meant debian-boot.



 Denis
 
 On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:08:23PM +, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
  
  On Mon, 2003-02-24 at 22:01, Denis Barbier wrote:
   On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 08:01:05PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
   [...]
This package should behava as follows:

  0. extract available languages from list of available locales
 (mapping language code - language name)
   
   I disagree, there is no reason to propose languages which have no
   translated templates.
  
  There are (partial) translations for Linux into at least 58 languages
  (in iso-codes, I've collected translations for 58; I know the Indian
  translations do more that I've not seen); we have translations for a lot
  less.
  We want the user to be able to select languages once on setup; hence
  allow them to do it here; 
  maybe we just show the 7 or so template-translated languages here, with
  Other, allowing a fuller list, but ..
   given the modular nature of the installer, how do we know what
  translations we have in total? The full list is probably safer.
  
  
  1. present list of language names, and ask the user to pick one.
   
  2. if the language is available in several regions (maps to several
 locales), ask which region / language variant to use.  (allow
 user to [back] off to the language list.
   
   Why don't merge 1 and 2 into a single list?
  
  3. pass the locale information on to the parts that needs it.

Based on this information a locale is selected.  This locale maps to one
language, one region, a priority list of fallback languages,
   
   Does this mean that LANGUAGE is fully determined by this locale, or can
   it be edited?
   
and a default keyboard layout.
   
   Shouldn't keyboard layout be handled by kbd-chooser?
   
  
  kbd-chooser picks the default mostly based on language (it may also do
  so based on autodetecting kbd, particularly in the USB case).
  
  Please don't have languagechooser have knowledge of kbdmaps; this is
  complex enough as it is, and modularity should not be broken.
  
  
  Also,  allow for the case that a (default) language and country may be
  autodetected and passed to languagechooser by a (as yet unwritten)
  previous module. Some BIOSes  bootloaders, eg the SRM console on
  Alphas, have language, country settings; a udeb might read these and use
  them to pick default languages,etc for languagechooser, in which case
  the languagechooser might lower the priority of the question, and allow
  that question to be skipped.
  
  - Alastair
  
  -- 
  Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  GPG Key fingerprint = 9E64 E714 8E08 81F9 F3DC  1020 FA8E 3790 9051 38F4
  
  He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from
  oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that
  will reach to himself.
  
  - --Thomas Paine
  
 
-- 
Alastair McKinstry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = 9E64 E714 8E08 81F9 F3DC  1020 FA8E 3790 9051 38F4

He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from
oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that
will reach to himself.

- --Thomas Paine



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Re: How I want languagechooser to behave

2003-02-24 Thread Denis Barbier
On Mon, Feb 24, 2003 at 11:51:01PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
 [Denis Barbier]
  I disagree, there is no reason to propose languages which have no
  translated templates.
 
 Actually, I use this information to also set the default language in
 KDE and GNOME, as well as the default dictionary in ispell.
[...]

Maybe I missed the purpose of languagechooser?  Is it supposed to
select installation language, or locales when the system is up?
IMO it should be the former, then only languages which provide
translated debconf templates for debian-installer should be listed.

  Does this mean that LANGUAGE is fully determined by this locale, or
  can it be edited?
 
 I want it to be fully determined by the locale, and do not see the
 need to edit it manually.  Do you think the first time users need to
 edit this list of fallback translations?

Sure, if I prefer reading German than English, I would like to set
LANGUAGE=fr:de

Being able to pass LANG and/or LANGUAGE variables on boot prompt would
also be nice.

Denis


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#181975: di-utils-mkfs: failure with unpartitioned hard drive

2003-02-24 Thread Thorsten Sauter

Hi all,

I think we really shouldn't do this

It's an unusual way to use harddisks, and if the people is willing to do
this, then he can always use the shell (tty2) and make it by hand.

And it doesn't save lot of diskspace.

Bye
Thorsten

-- 
Thorsten Sauter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

(Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?)



pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#180694: does not explain why no partitions are available

2003-02-24 Thread Thorsten Sauter

Hi,

what do you think should happen hier?

A simple message sorry, no partitions detected, please load modules
(or something). Or a detailed message with something like: 2 partitions
found, but no one of those contains a ext2 partition flag?

Bye
Thorsten

-- 
Thorsten Sauter
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

(Is there life after /sbin/halt -p?)



pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#182349: anna: Should reload packages file if something went wrong last time

2003-02-24 Thread Matt Kraai
On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 12:56:22AM +0100, Martin Sj?gren wrote:
 tis 2003-02-25 klockan 00.25 skrev Matt Kraai:
  When you rerun anna, you will not get the new Packages file.  The
  net retriever uses the -c option to wget, which will only append
  to the existing file.
  
   Where is this failing? Are you saying that you want an eplicit way to
   re-install this already installed package?
  
  anna should unlink the Packages file before redownloading to
  ensure that we retrieve the latest version.  This isn't a problem
  for udebs because their contents don't change.
 
 Are we talking about the same thing at all? anna removes the Packages
 file after parsing it:
 
 unlink(DOWNLOAD_DIR /Packages);
 
 I guess if it fails mid-download you might have an incomplete Packages
 file still there. In that case, I think this is something that should be
 changed in net-retriever.

So we already download the latest Packages file each time?

Thomas, aren't we already doing what you want?

# If the Packages gets updated after the packages.
# The downloaded Packages file can list packages that have been replaced by newer
# versions, the old ones ceasing to be available
# Then a reload (after the Packages file has been adjusted) helps.

Matt
-- 
Oink!


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#182349: anna: Should reload packages file if something wentwrong last time

2003-02-24 Thread John Summerfield
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Thomas Viehmann wrote:

 [Sorry, forgot the bug cc in my first post.]
 
 Matt Kraai wrote:
 [anna reloading package files]
  What problem this fix?
 One gets invalid packages files every so often (e.g. during mirror update).
 

I get messages that my Package files are corrupt sometimes wrt my
local (Woody) mirror which I've constructed from ISO images. However,
there don't seem to be any adverse consequences, so I've ignored it.

Should I report this as a bug, if so, against what?



-- 
Cheers
John Summerfield
Please, no off-list mail. It won't be read, it will be handled as spam.

 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Running debian-installer within bochs and uml

2003-02-24 Thread John Summerfield
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003, Thomas Viehmann wrote:

 Hi.
 
 Because I don't have a cdrw burner nor a desire to reboot my computer with the
 debian-installer mirror for installing, I've been trying to run debian-installer
 within a bochs simulation session and uml.
 Bochs is somewhat slow, but the alternative plex86 doesn't seem to support
 networking. user-mode-linux doesn't support the mapping block devices as much
 AFAIK, so one has to use the ubd devices.

Check the UML documentation. I don't have it to hand at the moment, but
I believe there is a commandline option to map drives to hd{a,b,c} etc.

BTW UML would provide a reason to not partition drives.

 
 

-- 
Cheers
John Summerfield
Please, no off-list mail. It won't be read, it will be handled as spam.

 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



cdrom-checker_0.01_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-02-24 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
cdrom-checker_0.01.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cdrom-checker/cdrom-checker_0.01.dsc
cdrom-checker_0.01.tar.gz
  to pool/main/c/cdrom-checker/cdrom-checker_0.01.tar.gz
cdrom-checker_0.01_all.udeb
  to pool/main/c/cdrom-checker/cdrom-checker_0.01_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#182349: anna: Should reload packages file if something went wrong last time

2003-02-24 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Package: anna
Version: N/A; reported 2003-02-24
Severity: whishlist

I think it would often be preferable if anna (i.e. menu option Load installer
modules) would reload package files if called for the second time.
(However, please feel free to close this bug if you disagree.)

Cheers

Thomas


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature