Re: Woody boot-floppies use flawed kernels

2003-04-02 Thread Thomas Viehmann
HI Jonathan,

Jonathan Quick wrote:
>   Is there any intention to release a new version of the Woody boot-floppies
> based on the kernel-image-2.2.25 and kernel-image-2.4.20-1 kernels which 
> include the ptrace security hole fix ( see DSA-270 for example.)  Obviously
> this would require similar patched kernels for all architectures to be
> available too.  Perhaps a critical or grave bug should be filed against
> the boot-floppies & debian-cd to ensure this issue receives attention ?

For installation at least, a local root hole is completely irrelevant. (There is
no root password and no users.)
The only thing that needs to be ensured is that the installed kernel is not
vulnerable. That means
- until a new point release is made, stock kernels should be automatically
  upgraded via the security.d.o apt-lines,
- when a new point release is made, fixed kernels should be offered to install
  on the hard disk.
Unless there is a problem with one of these, I don't think there's much of a
bug, certainly not in boot floppies.

Cheers

T.


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Building d-i as a package

2003-04-02 Thread Alastair McKinstry
On Thu, 2003-04-03 at 00:35, Joey Hess wrote:
> Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> > In order to get d-i built on various archs, etc. I propose to create a
> > package debian-installer.
> > 
> > The plan would be that debuild in ./debian-installer/build builds
> > debian-installer-$(ARCH)_$(VERSION)_all.deb, that puts the images and
> > associated documentation into a place suitable for an archive, 
> > eg. /var/www/debian/dists/$(DIST)/main/disks-$(ARCH)/$(VERSION)/..
> 
> It's not clear to me if you intend for the package to include the whole
> debian-installer source tree, or just the build directory. This is the
> kind of thing the build directory is there for, anyway. Note that
> debian-installer/build/debian/control currently calls the package
> build-installer, and the package has never been uploaded as such because
> it isn't really autobuildable yet. But that is the plan indeed.
> 
Just the build directory.
I suspected that this is what people (eg you in particular) had in mind,
but couldn't find any references to it  (I haven't done an exhaustive
search of the debian-boot archives, but it should be in /doc when we're
finished, anyway).

It isn't autobuildable: I'm working ATM on a bug in the MIPS build that
puts the mklibs reducing process into an infinite loop, which I suspect
the buildd's may not like... but if you've no strong objections I'll
commit this patch to CVS (making sure it doesn't break your/Tollefs
daily upload process).



> It will really be up to the ftp team what form they want the images
> uploaded in. They may prefer a simple tarball that will be installed
> byhand. It will surely require either byhand processing or additional
> code on the ftp archive side of things, and it would be good if these
> builds could be fired off on a daily or weekly basis eventually without
> overloading the ftp maintainers.

Agreed; the ftp team get to decide how its laid out in the archive, and
when it goes in. But the package could give them feedback, and we need
autobuilding of the various archs soon for testing.

-- 
Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG Key fingerprint = 9E64 E714 8E08 81F9 F3DC  1020 FA8E 3790 9051 38F4

He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from
oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that
will reach to himself.

- --Thomas Paine


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Woody boot-floppies use flawed kernels

2003-04-02 Thread Jonathan Quick
Hi

  Is there any intention to release a new version of the Woody boot-floppies
based on the kernel-image-2.2.25 and kernel-image-2.4.20-1 kernels which 
include the ptrace security hole fix ( see DSA-270 for example.)  Obviously
this would require similar patched kernels for all architectures to be
available too.  Perhaps a critical or grave bug should be filed against
the boot-floppies & debian-cd to ensure this issue receives attention ?

Regards
  Jonathan Quick
Hartebeesthoek Radio Astronomy Observatory


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: CD Image typo

2003-04-02 Thread Matt Kraai
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 12:19:36PM -0800, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> On the CD Image I fetched from:
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/
> 
> The initial screen says "If you want to proceed with a safe 2.2.20
> kernel" or something like that, instead of noting that it's a recent 2.4
> kernel.  I'm not sure what package to file this minor bug against.

I believe you are talking about

 For a "safe" installation with kernel 2.2.20, you can press  to begin.

from debian-cd.  I don't know why you are seeing this on a sarge
disk, though.

Matt
-- 
It's most certainly GNU/Linux, not Linux.  Read more at
http://www.gnu.org/gnu/why-gnu-linux.html.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Building d-i as a package

2003-04-02 Thread Joey Hess
Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> In order to get d-i built on various archs, etc. I propose to create a
> package debian-installer.
> 
> The plan would be that debuild in ./debian-installer/build builds
> debian-installer-$(ARCH)_$(VERSION)_all.deb, that puts the images and
> associated documentation into a place suitable for an archive, 
> eg. /var/www/debian/dists/$(DIST)/main/disks-$(ARCH)/$(VERSION)/..

It's not clear to me if you intend for the package to include the whole
debian-installer source tree, or just the build directory. This is the
kind of thing the build directory is there for, anyway. Note that
debian-installer/build/debian/control currently calls the package
build-installer, and the package has never been uploaded as such because
it isn't really autobuildable yet. But that is the plan indeed.

It will really be up to the ftp team what form they want the images
uploaded in. They may prefer a simple tarball that will be installed
byhand. It will surely require either byhand processing or additional
code on the ftp archive side of things, and it would be good if these
builds could be fired off on a daily or weekly basis eventually without
overloading the ftp maintainers.

-- 
see shy jo


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


I love you, please call...

2003-04-02 Thread johnny6vuwy

Please Wait While The Email Loads...

Remove


Re: net image full

2003-04-02 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Apr 02, 2003 at 01:41:24PM +0200, Martin Sjögren wrote:
> mån 2003-03-31 klockan 04.04 skrev Erik Andersen:
> > > udhcpc works, but it needs a script to operate correctly.
> > 
> > It works great.  Just drop this in as your
> > /usr/share/udhcpc/default.script file and you are good to go:
> 
> ...
> 
> And what would it be using the ip command instead? I don't know enough
> about this... :/

I just did a bit of testing, and the script actually works
this time.  :)

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
#!/bin/sh
# udhcpc script using iproute by Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

# Remove annoying white space
IPADDR=`echo $ip|sed -e s/\ //g`

count_bits () {
case $1 in
0.0.0.0)echo "$IPADDR/0" ;;
128.0.0.0)  echo "$IPADDR/1" ;;
192.0.0.0)  echo "$IPADDR/2" ;;
224.0.0.0)  echo "$IPADDR/3" ;;
240.0.0.0)  echo "$IPADDR/4" ;;
248.0.0.0)  echo "$IPADDR/5" ;;
252.0.0.0)  echo "$IPADDR/6" ;;
254.0.0.0)  echo "$IPADDR/7" ;;
255.0.0.0)  echo "$IPADDR/8" ;;
255.128.0.0)echo "$IPADDR/9" ;;
255.192.0.0)echo "$IPADDR/10" ;;
255.224.0.0)echo "$IPADDR/11" ;;
255.240.0.0)echo "$IPADDR/12" ;;
255.248.0.0)echo "$IPADDR/13" ;;
255.252.0.0)echo "$IPADDR/14" ;;
255.254.0.0)echo "$IPADDR/15" ;;
255.255.0.0)echo "$IPADDR/16" ;;
255.255.128.0)  echo "$IPADDR/17" ;;
255.255.192.0)  echo "$IPADDR/18" ;;
255.255.224.0)  echo "$IPADDR/19" ;;
255.255.240.0)  echo "$IPADDR/20" ;;
255.255.248.0)  echo "$IPADDR/21" ;;
255.255.252.0)  echo "$IPADDR/22" ;;
255.255.254.0)  echo "$IPADDR/23" ;;
255.255.255.0)  echo "$IPADDR/24" ;;
255.255.255.128)echo "$IPADDR/25" ;;
255.255.255.192)echo "$IPADDR/26" ;;
255.255.255.224)echo "$IPADDR/27" ;;
255.255.255.240)echo "$IPADDR/28" ;;
255.255.255.248)echo "$IPADDR/29" ;;
255.255.255.252)echo "$IPADDR/30" ;;
255.255.255.254)echo "$IPADDR/31" ;;
255.255.255.255)echo "$IPADDR/32" ;;
*)  echo "$IPADDR/32" ;;
esac
}

[ -z "$1" ] && echo "Error: should be called from udhcpc" && exit 1
RESOLV_CONF="/etc/resolv.conf"
[ -n "$broadcast" ] && BROADCAST="broadcast $broadcast"
[ -n "$subnet" ] && IPADDR=`count_bits $subnet`


case "$1" in
deconfig)
/bin/ip link set $interface up
;;

renew|bound)
/bin/ip addr flush dev $interface
/bin/ip addr add $IPADDR dev $interface $BROADCAST

if [ -n "$router" ] ; then
for i in $router ; do
/bin/ip route add default via $i dev $interface
done
fi

if [ -n "$hostname" ]; then
hostname $hostname
fi

echo "# Generated automatically by udhcpc" > $RESOLV_CONF
echo "" >> $RESOLV_CONF
if [ -n "$domain" ] ; then
echo search $domain >> $RESOLV_CONF
fi
for i in $dns ; do
echo nameserver $i >> $RESOLV_CONF
done
;;
esac
exit 0



pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Building d-i as a package; sig provlems

2003-04-02 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Ok, I resent the message with signed a different mailer, to verify.
But I will be sending messages unsigned for the next while, until the
bug gets fixed in evolution / gpg.
Mail me if you need a message to be signed / encrypted.

- Alastair


On Wed, 2003-04-02 at 20:37, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 07:06:02PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> 
> > Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > GPG Key fingerprint = 9E64 E714 8E08 81F9 F3DC  1020 FA8E 3790 9051 38F4
> 
> Anybody else running gpg 1.0.6 or 1.2.x got 'BAD Signature' on this
> message?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> Emile.
-- 
Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG Key fingerprint = 9E64 E714 8E08 81F9 F3DC  1020 FA8E 3790 9051 38F4

He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from
oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that
will reach to himself.

- --Thomas Paine



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: net image full

2003-04-02 Thread Erik Andersen
On Wed Apr 02, 2003 at 01:41:24PM +0200, Martin Sjögren wrote:
> mån 2003-03-31 klockan 04.04 skrev Erik Andersen:
> > > udhcpc works, but it needs a script to operate correctly.
> > 
> > It works great.  Just drop this in as your
> > /usr/share/udhcpc/default.script file and you are good to go:
> 
> ...
> 
> And what would it be using the ip command instead? I don't know enough
> about this... :/

I think this this should work (entirely untested):

#!/bin/sh
# udhcpc script using iproute by Erik Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[ -z "$1" ] && echo "Error: should be called from udhcpc" && exit 1
RESOLV_CONF="/etc/resolv.conf"


case "$1" in
deconfig)
/bin/ip link set $interface up
;;

renew|bound)
/bin/ip addr add $ip/$mask dev $interface

if [ -n "$router" ] ; then
for i in $router ; do
/bin/ip route add default via $i dev $interface
done
fi

if [ -n "$hostname" ]; then
hostname $hostname
fi

echo "# Generated automatically by udhcpc" > $RESOLV_CONF
echo "" >> $RESOLV_CONF
if [ -n "$domain" ] ; then
echo search $domain >> $RESOLV_CONF
fi
for i in $dns ; do
echo nameserver $i >> $RESOLV_CONF
done
;;  
esac
exit 0

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Building d-i as a package

2003-04-02 Thread Cardenas
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 09:37:07PM +0200, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 07:06:02PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> 
> > Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > GPG Key fingerprint = 9E64 E714 8E08 81F9 F3DC  1020 FA8E 3790 9051 38F4
> 
> Anybody else running gpg 1.0.6 or 1.2.x got 'BAD Signature' on this
> message?
> 

yes, 1.0.6-3. bad sig. 

-- 
michael cardenas   | lead software engineer, lindows.com
hyperpoem.net  | GNU/Linux software developer
people.debian.org/~mbc | encrypted email preferred

"If a nation expects to be ignorant and free... it expects what never
was and never will be."
- Thomas Jefferson


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: Building d-i as a package

2003-04-02 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> The plan would be that debuild in ./debian-installer/build builds
> debian-installer-$(ARCH)_$(VERSION)_all.deb, that puts the images and
> associated documentation into a place suitable for an archive, 
> eg. /var/www/debian/dists/$(DIST)/main/disks-$(ARCH)/$(VERSION)/..
That would be very cool. Judging from my limited experience with building, the
syslinux should be updated for proper building without root, though.
I have filed a whishlist bug in addition to the debian installer bug.
In the meantime I've built my own 2.02 packages and changed the build/Makefile
$(FLOPPY_IMAGE) target to something along the lines of
# syslinux is used to make the floppy bootable.
mcopy -i$(FLOPPY_IMAGE).new $(KERNEL) ::linux
mcopy -i$(FLOPPY_IMAGE).new $(INITRD) ::initrd.gz
todos < syslinux.cfg > $(TEMP)/syslinux.cfg
mcopy -i$(FLOPPY_IMAGE).new $(TEMP)/syslinux.cfg ::syslinux.cfg

syslinux $(SYSLINUX_OPTS) $(FLOPPY_IMAGE).new
If course, I'll happily post a patch for the whole deal (cleaning out user mount
hack etc.).

Cheers

T.


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


CD Image typo

2003-04-02 Thread Jeff Bailey
On the CD Image I fetched from:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/

The initial screen says "If you want to proceed with a safe 2.2.20
kernel" or something like that, instead of noting that it's a recent 2.4
kernel.  I'm not sure what package to file this minor bug against.

Tks,
Jeff Bailey

-- 
Are you going to stay vegeterian?
Are you going to start eating human flesh?
(from http://www.moshez.org/vegeterian.html)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Building d-i as a package

2003-04-02 Thread Emile van Bergen
Hi,

On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 07:06:02PM +0100, Alastair McKinstry wrote:

> Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> GPG Key fingerprint = 9E64 E714 8E08 81F9 F3DC  1020 FA8E 3790 9051 38F4

Anybody else running gpg 1.0.6 or 1.2.x got 'BAD Signature' on this
message?

Cheers,


Emile.

-- 
E-Advies - Emile van Bergen   [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
tel. +31 (0)70 3906153   http://www.e-advies.nl


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Building d-i as a package

2003-04-02 Thread Alastair McKinstry

Hi,

In order to get d-i built on various archs, etc. I propose to create a
package debian-installer.
(If this is documented somewhere else, a pointer would be gratefully
accepted, and uploaded to /doc)

The plan would be that debuild in ./debian-installer/build builds
debian-installer-$(ARCH)_$(VERSION)_all.deb, that puts the images and
associated documentation into a place suitable for an archive, 
eg. /var/www/debian/dists/$(DIST)/main/disks-$(ARCH)/$(VERSION)/..

Its an _all.deb so that all the images can be placed on a single server.

This mechanism allows the buildds to do the building for us, and
provides us a place to put the test builds; it also gives us all the
usual benefits of our package archive scheme.

In http://people.debian.org/~mckinstry/d-i/debian.tar there is the files
I propose to commit (further work needed, proof of concept for i386);
and an example debian-installer-i386_0.01_all.deb

Comments, suggestions, better ideas, anyone?

- Alastair


-- 
Alastair McKinstry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
GPG Key fingerprint = 9E64 E714 8E08 81F9 F3DC  1020 FA8E 3790 9051 38F4

He that would make his own liberty secure must guard even his enemy from
oppression; for if he violates this duty he establishes a precedent that
will reach to himself.

- --Thomas Paine



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Bug#152152: Welcome !

2003-04-02 Thread solobosojvsf
Title: Untitled Document





Lowest 
  price on viagra guaranteed 
  !
START LIVING TODAY!

  We are the cheapest suppliers 
  of Sildenafil Citrate (Viagra) !
  
  We are THE BEST solution for impotence. Our world-renowned products are created 
  in a state-of-the-art FDA-approved laboratory, with no side effects… 
100 
  % Guaranteed
  
ENERGIZE your SEX LIFE ! Click 
  here
 
 
 
Click here to be removed remove 




Never worry about roaming again g ve

2003-04-02 Thread
Debian-arm

Push Now
Below is the HOTTEST cellular phone deal on the market!!


- 500 Whenever Minutes & Unlimited Weekends for Only $39.99 Per Month!
- Free Cellular Phone
- Free Car Charger
- Free Belt Clip
- Free Handsfree Kit
- Free Nationwide Long Distance
- Free Voice Mail
- Free Call Waiting
- Free 3 Way Calling
- Free Battery Charger

 
Push Now


If you aren't interested in this simply respond to my email.
jfc paekb
qiapdzs mjvytnu zhjcbi rttfdzxtrv

cotoon cppture

2003-04-02 Thread Joseph Aldrich




  

  
Hey how have you been?
  

  


  
  

  



  


  
  




春天播下种子,秋天就会收获

2003-04-02 Thread guest
debian-boot:您好!


  
朋友,您是否接到过有关网赚的邮件?是的,我接到过,于是成了很多网站的会员,当然了,也给上线寄了钱.我按照他们规章制度,去辛辛苦苦的发展下线。可是,注册的多,给我寄钱的少.类似的我做过酷蜘株联盟,钱方物流,软件联盟,AIDDO.国外的做过cashfiesta,pointsmoney,mintmail.可是,也是辛辛苦苦的做了几个月,并没有收到过美元。以下是我接触到的一个真实的,能给你带来收益的网站,它们需要您的劳动,诚实的劳动.
普光网络,强烈推荐.http://www1.nu18.com/soho/?mid=cfplhhs
 
该公司是一家从事网络市场开发的公司,(实际性质是网上超市类+广告公司),你注册为新会员时给上线寄钱,发展了下线时,下线也给你寄钱
 
,下线再发展的下线也会给你寄钱,你的钱越来越多.普光事业投入仅50元钱,就可以获得丰厚的收益。当然了,这必须在诚实的劳动下,辛勤的劳动下而获得的.
  会员权利 
:一次注册终身拥有代理会员资格,拥有一个全套个性化的网络营销系统代理网站,无限次推荐下级代理而获取回报的权利,收款地址等个人信息能从主页登录修改。
具体注册方法如下: 
  首先进入该网站http://www1.nu18.com/soho/?mid=cfplhhs 
  点击网页右边中上部的“注册”,进入注册页面进行注册: 
   用户名:必须填写,用于以后登录网站用的,要记住吆 !(只能填字母或数字) 
  姓名:(填你的真实姓名(中文)为了以后的收钱方便,以后不能改动) 
  银行卡号/开户行:暂时可以不填写,以后可以更改的。 
  邮编/地址: 可以简单在先填写一个邮编就可以了,以后可以更改的。 
  E-mail: 如果没有可以去申请一个免费的信箱。 
  昵 称:(你在网上用的名字,可随意填) 
  建议汇款方式:随便选一个就行了,以后可以更改的。 
  身份证号码: 
一定要填写的,当然如果你现在记不起来了,也可以乱写一个18位的数字,但要符和身份证编码规则并记住了,
 (如密码丢失时用来确定你的身份) 
  注册成功后,你就有一个系统分配的临时网站,上面有你的4个上线,你按照要求,分别寄10元钱(共5位)给他们,并发邮件给他们确认。
他们收到钱以后就把你激活,你就有一个你的正式网站。 
 如果你不放弃,你就可能得到。我亲爱的兄弟姐妹们你们还不行动起来,你们说对吗? 
如果大家心动了决定注册这个网站开始赚钱了,那就来吧.(注意:点击下列链接)http://www1.nu18.com/soho/?mid=cfplhhs
   
朋友们可以加我的QQ号:119482993,我们一起交流网络淘金的心得。

若有打饶,敬请删除,谢谢
致
礼!
     guest
     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
     2003-04-02


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: cdebconf always falling back to English?

2003-04-02 Thread Denis Barbier
On Wed, Apr 02, 2003 at 02:13:19PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> 
> Should english (en) always be a fallback langauge?

In debian-installer, yes.  As a debconf replacement, no.

> I want it to be able to use the content of en.po as the list of languages
> to choose.
> 
> I believe this patch should work.

Hmmm no, 'en' should be added after other languages.
Why don't you append 'en' to LANGUAGE in languagechooser?

Denis


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



cdebconf always falling back to English?

2003-04-02 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen

Should english (en) always be a fallback langauge?  I want it to be
able to use the content of en.po as the list of languages to choose.

I believe this patch should work.

Index: template.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/debian-boot/debian-installer/tools/cdebconf/src/template.c,v
retrieving revision 1.21
diff -u -3 -p -u -r1.21 template.c
--- template.c  19 Dec 2002 00:38:44 -  1.21
+++ template.c  2 Apr 2003 12:10:23 -
@@ -63,6 +63,13 @@ static const char *getlanguage(void)
memset(cache_list_lang_ptr, 0, sizeof(struct cache_list_lang *));

p = cache_list_lang_ptr;
+
+   /* Always fall back to English */
+   p->lang = strdup("en");
+   p->next = (struct cache_list_lang *) malloc(sizeof(*p->next));
+   p->next->next = NULL;
+   p = p->next;
+
cache_cur_lang = strdup(envlang);
cpb = cache_cur_lang;
while((cpe = strchr(cpb, ':')) != NULL)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: net image full

2003-04-02 Thread Martin Sjögren
mån 2003-03-31 klockan 04.04 skrev Erik Andersen:
> > udhcpc works, but it needs a script to operate correctly.
> 
> It works great.  Just drop this in as your
> /usr/share/udhcpc/default.script file and you are good to go:

...

And what would it be using the ip command instead? I don't know enough
about this... :/


/Martin
-- 
Martin Sjögren
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  GPG key: http://www.mdstud.chalmers.se/~md9ms/gpg.html
  let hello = "hello" : hello in putStr (unlines hello)


signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signeradmeddelandedel


Re: debian-installer - final use of busybox-cvs

2003-04-02 Thread Martin Sjögren
tis 2003-04-01 klockan 22.43 skrev Bastian Blank:
> - finish the iproute version of netcfg or include ifconfig/route in the
>   udebs.

BTW, I tested the iproute branch of netcfg and it could use some work,
IMO. Why do I have to answer lots of questions when netcfg-dhcp did it
automatically? Why the menu of interfaces, why not just let the user
re-run the menu item if they want to configure more than one interface?

I think it's a very very bad idea to complicate things in the name of
generality!


/M
-- 
Martin Sjögren
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  GPG key: http://www.mdstud.chalmers.se/~md9ms/gpg.html
  let hello = "hello" : hello in putStr (unlines hello)


signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signeradmeddelandedel


Re: ethdetect - module name mismatch

2003-04-02 Thread Martin Sjögren
ons 2003-04-02 klockan 11.55 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm trying to install with
> gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
> as of 01/04 on ia32.
> 
> My ethernet card is detected correctly as RTL8139. The installer
> attempts to load rtl8139 module however there is no module rtl8139
> under /lib/modules (modprobe -v rtl8139, Can't locate module rtl8139).
> 8139too should be used instead. 

Yes, this is because discover 1.x doesn't support 2.4 kernels. This will
be fixed when we migrate to discover 2.x.


/Martin
-- 
Martin Sjögren
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  GPG key: http://www.mdstud.chalmers.se/~md9ms/gpg.html
  let hello = "hello" : hello in putStr (unlines hello)


signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signeradmeddelandedel


ethdetect - module name mismatch

2003-04-02 Thread masik
Hi,

I'm trying to install with
gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/sarge-i386-netinst.iso
as of 01/04 on ia32.

My ethernet card is detected correctly as RTL8139. The installer
attempts to load rtl8139 module however there is no module rtl8139
under /lib/modules (modprobe -v rtl8139, Can't locate module rtl8139).
8139too should be used instead. 

cheers
Jiri


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]