Bug#218560: debian-installer-demo: stops just after the language selection screen

2003-10-31 Thread Andrea Tasso
Package: debian-installer-demo
Version: 20031029
Severity: normal


 hi, I tried debian-installer-demo, but it does not work, it
 stops just after the language selection screen, I mean the next one
 opens, but when you ask to load modules, that is the only way to go
 on, it does not.
 I started it from a shell prompt, with my system up and running.
 I thought it could be a good tool to give a presentation about debian installation.
 thanks and bye
 Andrea

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dragonII 2.6.0-test3 #1 SMP Tue Oct 7 19:54:38 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [powermac] installation report gluck image from october 31

2003-10-31 Thread Matt Kraai
On Sat, Nov 01, 2003 at 02:18:45AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> Now the problems I faced:
> 
> - debootstrap stopped with error code 127.  I read the 
>   /target/var/log/debootstrap.log:
> ln: /target/usr/bin/awk: File exists

This usually means that you ran debootstrap twice without
reformatting the partition.  Try rerunning partconf.

-- 
Matt


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[powermac] installation report gluck image from october 31

2003-10-31 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
Hi all! 

Many progress! Many thanks for the good job. 

Now the problems I faced:

- debootstrap stopped with error code 127.  I read the 
  /target/var/log/debootstrap.log:
ln: /target/usr/bin/awk: File exists

So I deleted the symlink in a shell (I cannot go to another console :(),
then exit and re-run install the  base system. A lot of packages seem to
have been installed but I got a debootstrap error code 1. In the log:
Errors were encountered while processing:
  amiga-fdisk
/usr/sbin/debootstrap: 1: sleep: not found

I'll try tomorrow (heu...  well, later today ;)) with
DEBCONF_PRIORITY=normal

Cheers and many thanks for the good job! 

-- 
  .''`.   ** Debian GNU/Linux **
 : :' :  Arnaud   Vandyck
 `. `'   http://people.debian.org/~avdyk/
   `-


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


2.6.0 kernel

2003-10-31 Thread Daniel Burton
Hi, has anyone considered making a version of the installer that uses 
the new 2.6.0 kernel?  I have a laptop that refuses to do a net install 
of anything without that kernel version (at least without a lot of 
difficult patching of the 2.4 kernel before I can do anything), and 
because of that, I'm interested in having a quick reinstallation route 
of "testing" in the event of disaster recovery  So if no one has 
worked on this yet, I'm interested in making a 2.6.0 installer (I also 
just made some patches to modconf so it can at least list and load 
modules on 2.5 and later kernels).

I thought this would be trivial and I could just change the 
KERNELVERSION variable, but then I realized the packages from 
debian-installer's sources.list weren't from the normal debian sources, 
and I wasn't quite sure where they came from or how they got generated.

(Sorry if this has already been discussed, but the mailing list archive 
search function doesn't like to search for numbers or periods [so 
"2.6.0" won't work].)

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Processed: reassign 218514 to boot-floppies

2003-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 218514 boot-floppies
Bug#218514: base-config: should not allow sub mount points before parent mount points
Bug reassigned from package `base-config' to `boot-floppies'.

>
End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Failed PowerPC install

2003-10-31 Thread Joe Drew
I recently tried installing Sarge via the netinst image (file date
2003-10-08) on my 900 MHz G3 iBook. Some comments:
1) When I wasn't connected to the network, dhcp took a long time to
   time out. In the meantime, nothing was displayed on the screen.
   This should be changed: at least a message "Trying to gain an
   IP address. Please plug in an ethernet cable" would have helped.
2) After first set-up, I was dumped into pfdisk. No problem, as I
   then partitioned the free space on my disk into various bits for
   Linux.
   However, later I was asked to "Automatically partition my disk."
   This seems counter-productive - I want to keep OS X on my machine -
   so I answered no. However, apparently kernel install depends on
   having run the automatic partition (or something else, which
   failed.)
   I tried re-running installation of base, and debootstrap returned
   an error code. I guess it's not idempotent; however, after that
   I was utterly unable to proceed. I gave up and went back into OS X.

Please CC replies to me.

-- 
Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

My weblog doesn't detail my personal life: http://me.woot.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#218514: base-config: should not allow sub mount points before parent mount points

2003-10-31 Thread Elizabeth Barham
Matt writes:

> Elizabeth Barham wrote:
> > When creating the partitions and subsequent mount points, I specified
> > /usr/local prior to /usr. This caused /usr/local to be placed in fstab
> > prior to /usr which then clobbered /usr/local when /usr was mounted.
> > 
> > I'm suggesting that base-config notice that a sub-mount point has
> > been specified prior to its parent(s) and/or some kind of ordering
> > takes place prior to writing fstab.
> 
> Are you using the woody installer (boot-floppies) or the sarge installer
> (debian-installer)?

Woody.

Elizabeth


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#218514: base-config: should not allow sub mount points before parent mount points

2003-10-31 Thread Joey Hess
Elizabeth Barham wrote:
> Package: base-config
> Version: 1.33.18
> Severity: normal
> 
> When creating the partitions and subsequent mount points, I specified
> /usr/local prior to /usr. This caused /usr/local to be placed in fstab
> prior to /usr which then clobbered /usr/local when /usr was mounted.
> 
> I'm suggesting that base-config notice that a sub-mount point has
> been specified prior to its parent(s) and/or some kind of ordering
> takes place prior to writing fstab.

I don't understand what this has to do with base-config. What version of
debian were you installing?

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#218518: hangs after running partconf

2003-10-31 Thread kraai
Package: main-menu
Version: 0.047
Severity: grave

After running partconf, main-menu hangs.  Here is a the tail of /var/log/syslog:

 Oct 31 19:04:12 (none) user.debug frontend: --> GET partconf/confirm
 Oct 31 19:04:12 (none) user.debug frontend: <-- 0 true
 Oct 31 19:04:12 (none) syslog.info klogd: Adding Swap: 281096k swap-space
(priority -1)
 Oct 31 19:05:22 (none) user.debug frontend: --> GET debconf/priority
 Oct 31 19:05:22 (none) user.debug frontend: <-- 0 high
 Oct 31 19:05:22 (none) user.debug frontend: --> GET debconf/priority
 Oct 31 19:05:22 (none) user.debug frontend: <-- 0 high

-- 
Matt


-
This message was sent using the LA Free-Net - LA's best kept secret.
http://www.lafn.org/




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#218514: base-config: should not allow sub mount points before parent mount points

2003-10-31 Thread kraai
Elizabeth Barham wrote:
> When creating the partitions and subsequent mount points, I specified
> /usr/local prior to /usr. This caused /usr/local to be placed in fstab
> prior to /usr which then clobbered /usr/local when /usr was mounted.
> 
> I'm suggesting that base-config notice that a sub-mount point has
> been specified prior to its parent(s) and/or some kind of ordering
> takes place prior to writing fstab.

Are you using the woody installer (boot-floppies) or the sarge installer
(debian-installer)?

-- 
Matt


-
This message was sent using the LA Free-Net - LA's best kept secret.
http://www.lafn.org/




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#218514: base-config: should not allow sub mount points before parent mount points

2003-10-31 Thread Elizabeth Barham
Package: base-config
Version: 1.33.18
Severity: normal

When creating the partitions and subsequent mount points, I specified
/usr/local prior to /usr. This caused /usr/local to be placed in fstab
prior to /usr which then clobbered /usr/local when /usr was mounted.

I'm suggesting that base-config notice that a sub-mount point has
been specified prior to its parent(s) and/or some kind of ordering
takes place prior to writing fstab.

-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux drwho 2.4.22-isa-only-386 #3 Thu Oct 9 19:59:37 CDT 2003 i486
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages base-config depends on:
ii  adduser3.47  Add and remove users and groups
ii  apt0.5.4 Advanced front-end for dpkg
ii  bsdutils   1:2.11n-4 Basic utilities from 4.4BSD-Lite.
ii  console-data   1999.08.29-24 Keymaps, fonts, charset maps, fall
ii  debconf1.0.32Debian configuration management sy
ii  passwd 2902-12   Change and administer password and
ii  tasksel1.18  Tool for selecting tasks for insta


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Debconf Templates Style Guide

2003-10-31 Thread Matt Zimmerman
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 07:43:09PM +0100, Henning Makholm wrote:

> Scripsit Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> > Of course it would, and I would never recommend doing so.
> 
> So instead you're recommending an approach that forces the user to
> choose *before* reconfiguring between
>  a) not being told what the maintainer thought was a sensible default
>  b) not being told how he has currently configured the package
> 
> I don't see why that would help anyone.

You aren't making sense.  You said that the problem was that the user wanted
the safe defaults and couldn't tell what they were.  I provided an idea for
a solution, which was to give the user an option to forget their current
configuration and confirm the safe defaults.  Now you're complaining that
the user has too much choice.

> Which is not terribly helpful to a user who wants to make an informed
> choice *between* the safe default and his own prior customizations.

Writing a paragraph of text attempting to tell the user what the safe
default is, without making reference to any UI-specific widgets, is a waste
of time and space.  Changing the debconf interface for the purpose of
creating a horrific UI which attempts to present the user with three sets of
options for each possible question would be equally silly.

-- 
 - mdz


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: FWD: Accepted debian-installer 20031029 (i386 source)

2003-10-31 Thread Joey Hess
Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> 
> > I'm not sure why you think the cd builds have more than 2 days lag.
> > They're built every day.
> 
> >From the CVS or from the released packages ?
> 
> Currently, I mostly focus on debconf stuff and really want to see how
> templates look with the 0.48 version of cdebconf.
> 
> I may be wrong, but the current daily built CD image does not have
> it. Am I wrong ?

I thought the lag was only one or two days for CD builds. If you want
something quicker you will of course have to build your own..

> Anyway, currently, any image i either grab or build fails to detect
> the virtual CD in my VMWare machine. "modprobe ide-cd" fails...so I
> cannot really test a lot of things

As far as I know that was fixed in the CD's yesterday. I watched two
people do CD installs on IRC after the fix went in anyway.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#217164: marked as done (cdebconf: Danish po-debconf translation)

2003-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 31 Oct 2003 20:41:14 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Oct 2003 22:56:24 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Oct 22 17:56:22 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk [193.162.153.2] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1ACRtt-0001Hq-00; Wed, 22 Oct 2003 17:56:21 -0500
Received: from kolon (mbrix.dk [80.196.134.152])
by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 55D6347FF20; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 00:56:20 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from mbp by kolon with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 1ACRu9-00035C-00; Thu, 23 Oct 2003 00:56:37 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1098857787=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Morten Brix Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: cdebconf: Danish po-debconf translation
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.35
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2003 00:56:37 +0200
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Morten Brix Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_70,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_21 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)

This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug.

--===1098857787==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Package: cdebconf
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch

Hi,

Attached is da.po, the Danish po-debconf translation for cdebconf.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux kolon 2.4.21 #1 tir sep 23 16:00:35 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=da_DK.ISO-8859-1, LC_CTYPE=da_DK.ISO-8859-1


--===1098857787==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="/home/mbp/da.po"

#
#Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext
#documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to
#this format, e.g. by running:
# info -n '(gettext)PO Files'
# info -n '(gettext)Header Entry'
#
#Some information specific to po-debconf are available at
#/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans
# or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans
#
#Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files.
#
msgid ""
msgstr ""
"Project-Id-Version: cdebconf 0.47\n"
"Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n"
"POT-Creation-Date: 2003-10-09 00:44+0200\n"
"PO-Revision-Date: 2003-10-23 01:00+0200\n"
"Last-Translator: Morten Brix Pedersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"Language-Team: debian-l10n-danish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n"
"MIME-Version: 1.0\n"
"Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1\n"
"Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n"

#. Choices
#: ../cdebconf-udeb.templates:3
msgid "critical, high, medium, low"
msgstr "kritisk, høj, mellem, lav"

#. Description
#: ../cdebconf-udeb.templates:5
msgid "Ignore questions with a priority less than..."
msgstr "Ignorér spørgsmål med en prioritet lavere end..."

#. Description
#: ../cdebconf-udeb.templates:5
msgid ""
"Packages that use debconf for configuration prioritize the questions they "
"might ask you. Only questions with a certain priority or higher are actually "
"shown to you; all less important questions are skipped."
msgstr ""
"Pakker der bruger debconf til opsætning, prioriterer spørgsmålene som de vil "
"stille dig. Kun spørgsmål med en hvis prioritet eller højere vil rent faktisk "
"blive vist til dig; all mindre vigtige spørgsmål bliver sprunget over."

#. Description
#: ../cdebconf-udeb.templates:5
msgid ""
"You can select the lowest priority of question you want to see:\n"
" - 'critical' is for items that will probably break the system\n"
"without user intervention.\n"
" - 'high' is for items that don't have reasonable defaults.\n"
" - 'medium' is for normal items that have reasonable defaults.\n"
" - 'low' is for trivial items that have defaults that will work in\n"
"   the vast majority of cases."
msgstr ""
"Du kan vælge den laveste prioritet af spørgsmål, som du vil se:\n"
" - 'kritisk' er for ting der potentielt kan bringe systemet i orden "
"   medmindre du bliver spurgt først.\n"
" 

Bug#215583: marked as done (crashes on missing default for boolean question)

2003-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 31 Oct 2003 20:41:14 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2003 14:33:48 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 13 09:33:47 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A93lb-0007Uw-00; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 09:33:47 -0500
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs21-28.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.28])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEB5917E1F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:33:41 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 324386E726; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 01:18:16 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 01:18:15 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: crashes on missing default for boolean question
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.34
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.5 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: cdebconf
Severity: normal

If I have a template with a boolean question and I accidentially left
out the default value, cdebconf crashes.

Template: iso-scan/ask_second_pass
Type: boolean
Description: Do full disk search for installer ISO?
 The initial scan for installer ISOs, which looks only in common places,
 searched ${NUM_DIRS} directories in ${NUM_FILESYSTEMS} file systems without
 finding an installer ISO. It's possible that a more thorough search will
 find the ISO, but it may take a long time.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dragon 2.4.22 #1 Sun Oct 12 15:11:10 EDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC

--=20
see shy jo

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/ijWXd8HHehbQuO8RAhkDAJ9zMUZbhkDeckXsei+V65ytXymmDACgvXfS
CL383SQI+PS2L29Jp1cy9uU=
=5HP7
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe--

---
Received: (at 215583-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Oct 2003 19:41:21 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 31 13:41:21 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AFf95-Jp-00; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 13:41:19 -0600
Received: from mail-mx6.uio.no ([129.240.10.47])
by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
id 1AFf94-0001Zt-Tm; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 20:41:18 +0100
Received: from saruman.uio.no ([129.240.201.202])
by mail-mx6.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.14)
id 1AFf90-0002r2-H5; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 20:41:14 +0100
Received: from pre by saruman.uio.no with local (Exim 2.12 #7)
id 1AFf90-0003Ib-00; Fri, 31 Oct 2003 20:41:14 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Close bugs
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 20:41:14 +0100
X-MailScanner-Information: This message has been scanned for viruses/spam. Contact 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] if you have questions about this scanning.
X-UiO-MailScanner: No virus found
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_00
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_31
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_31 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


These bugs are fixed in CVS, and should have been closed on the last
upload.  Closing them now.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subj

Bug#215582: marked as done (move short descriptions to the bottom in the dialog frontend)

2003-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 31 Oct 2003 20:41:14 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Close bugs
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 Oct 2003 14:33:16 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Oct 13 09:33:15 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A93l5-0007Qg-00; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 09:33:15 -0500
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs21-28.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.28])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8270017E1F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 14:33:13 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 9A4DB6E7CD; Mon, 13 Oct 2003 01:27:18 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 01:27:18 -0400
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: move short descriptions to the bottom in the dialog frontend
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.34
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_20,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_13 
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)


--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: cdebconf
Severity: normal

cdebconf currently displays the short description from a template near
the top of the dialog box, in a special color. This is unlike debconf,
which puts the short description at the bottom of the dialo box, just
above the widget that the user can use to answer the question. I think
that debconf's behavior is better, because it encurages useful short
descriptions that can serve as prompts, and can be read in leu of
reading the whole long descrioption, to get the gist of the question if
the user is in a hurry.

For example, here is a template from debian-installer:

Template: cdrom-checker/start
Type: boolean
Default: false
_Description: CD-ROM integrity check
 Warning: this check depends on your hardware and may take some time.
 Are you sure that you want to continue?

This short description cannot stand on its own, and in a text-type
frontend, the display will probably be something like this:

 Warning: this check depends on your hardware and may take some time.=20
 Are you sure that you want to continue?=20

 CD-ROM integrity check _

If cdebconf worked like debconf (or if more people used its text
frontend), the natural thing would be to write the same question thus:

_Description: Do you want to continue with the integrity check?
 Warning: this check depends on your hardware and may take some time.

Note that currently in debian-installer, there are plenty of templates
using the first style, and plenty using the second. But there is still
time to fix them all to use a consistent style, and so I hope this
change can be made soon, so they get the *right* consistent style.

Note also that the exception to this rule is the note (and for cdebconf,
error) question types. For these, in debconf, the short description is
displayed at the top, same as in cdebconf.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dragon 2.4.22 #1 Sun Oct 12 15:11:10 EDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=3DC, LC_CTYPE=3DC

--=20
see shy jo

--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/ije1d8HHehbQuO8RAk/NAJ413RQSHLkEQbZKqm1lbXgXOh0NfgCgyBSd
oXlY3e9LyFdstShoSJfXKfU=
=jpZ3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--Qxx1br4bt0+wmkIi--

---
Received: (at 215582-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Oct 2003 19:41:22 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 31 13:41:21 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pat.uio.no [129.240.130.16] 
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
   

Bug#213314: partconf: invokes mkreiserfs interactively

2003-10-31 Thread Joey Hess
Martin suggested:
> > The way partconf mkreiserfs will cause mkreiserfs to ask questions,
> > which will freeze partconf.
> 
> Yes, I've been thinking about this. I think I will introduce templates
> partconf/mkfs/ for this. Something like:
> 
> Template: partconf/mkfs/reiserfs
> Type: string
> Default: %s  %s
> Description: internal thingy
> 
> Where the first %s is the mkfs program and the second is the path to the
> device.

Why not just make a policy that mkfs.* on d-i must all operate
noninteractively (with the possibility of using stdio for debconf if they
really need to ask a question), with a single argument that is the device
to mkfs.

Then mkfs.reiserfs would be a wrapper that calls the real binary, passing it
any  necessary flags. Or the binary itself could be modified in the udeb.
Either way, no debconf database (abuse?) is needed, just some quick
modifications of the udeb for reiserfs.

I think this needs to be fixed soon.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Problem in debian-installer-demo

2003-10-31 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> > Selected Portuguese (Brazil). One problem (well, a small problem) is 
> > that the languages are not sorted alphabetically.
> 
> Yeah, this is bug #215210. You were running it in an xterm; if you run
> it instead on the linux console you'll get a different and better
> display of that list that is closer to how it appears in the real
> installer. (Depending on the kernel you're running and whether the frame

Well, that language sorting a really a problem. Currently, languages
are sorted more or less erratically, depending on the way the word
"Choose" is translated. 

This with a hungarian choice at the beginning with looks quite
outdated (but I don't speak hungarian at all...just an impression)

I have no really good suggestion for sorting languages there,
howevermaybe the current mess is the only solution.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: FWD: Accepted debian-installer 20031029 (i386 source)

2003-10-31 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> I'm not sure why you think the cd builds have more than 2 days lag.
> They're built every day.

>From the CVS or from the released packages ?

Currently, I mostly focus on debconf stuff and really want to see how
templates look with the 0.48 version of cdebconf.

I may be wrong, but the current daily built CD image does not have
it. Am I wrong ?

Anyway, currently, any image i either grab or build fails to detect
the virtual CD in my VMWare machine. "modprobe ide-cd" fails...so I
cannot really test a lot of things

-- 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Fixed in NMU of cdebconf 0.48

2003-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 215582 + fixed
Bug#215582: move short descriptions to the bottom in the dialog frontend
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed

> tag 215583 + fixed
Bug#215583: crashes on missing default for boolean question
Tags were: pending
Tags added: fixed

> tag 217164 + fixed
Bug#217164: cdebconf: Danish po-debconf translation
Tags were: pending patch
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Fixed in NMU of cdebconf 0.48

2003-10-31 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
tag 215582 + fixed
tag 215583 + fixed
tag 217164 + fixed

quit

This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload.  The .changes file follows.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 19:00:23 +0100
Source: cdebconf
Binary: cdebconf-slang-udeb libdebconfclient0 cdebconf-priority cdebconf 
libdebconfclient0-dev cdebconf-udeb libdebconfclient0-udeb cdebconf-gtk-udeb 
cdebconf-text-udeb cdebconf-newt-udeb
Architecture: source i386
Version: 0.48
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Petter Reinholdtsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 cdebconf   - Debian Configuration Management System (C-implementation)
 cdebconf-gtk-udeb - Gtk+ frontend for Debian Configuration Management System (udeb)
 cdebconf-newt-udeb - Newt frontend for Debian Configuration Management System (udeb)
 cdebconf-priority - Change debconf priority (udeb)
 cdebconf-slang-udeb - S-Lang frontend for Debian Configuration Management System 
(udeb)
 cdebconf-text-udeb - Plain text frontend for Debian Configuration Management System 
(udeb)
 cdebconf-udeb - Debian Configuration Management System (C-implementation) (udeb)
 libdebconfclient0 - Debian Configuration Management System (C-implementation)
 libdebconfclient0-dev - Development files for cdebconf
 libdebconfclient0-udeb - Debian Configuration Management System (C-implementation) 
(udeb)
Closes: 215582 215583 217164
Changes: 
 cdebconf (0.48) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Denis Barbier
 - Sort translated choices when a select/multiselect template contains
   a line Listorder: lexicographic
   If some Choices items must not be sorted, they can be prepended with
   an exclamation mark.  Adding a comment is a good idea to let
   translators know why this sign has been put here:
 _Choices: ${FOO}, !Other[ You only have to translate Other, remove the 
exclamation mark and this comment between brackets]
   Currently text, newt, slang and gtk frontends support this feature.
 - Fix a crash with the newt frontend when a boolean question has no
   default value. Closes: #215583.
 - Let cdebconf newt frontend looks like debconf dialog: short description
   is moved just before input field, except for note and error template
   types.  Closes: #215582.
 - Make strlongest aware of wide chars.
 - Windows now adjust to text size with the newt frontend,
   * Steinar H. Gunderson
 - Makes cdebconf assume "show only unseen questions" by default,
   which makes it behave a lot more like debconf. This also makes
   unattended installs (ie. installs with pre-seeded debconf databases)
   possible without a non-interactive frontend.
 - Updated dpkg-reconfigure to make cdebconf show unseen questions,
   to keep it updated with the change above.
   * Kęstutis Biliūnas
 - Add Lithuanian translation (lt.po).
   * Claus Hindsgaul
 - Add Danish translation (da.po).
   * Petter Reinholdtsen
 - Add menu item for cdebconf-priority to list of translatable
   terms.
   * André Luís Lopes
 - Updated pt_BR (Brazilian Portuguese) translation.
   * Kenshi Muto
 - Update Japanese translation (ja.po)
   * Bart Cornelis
 - update dutch translation (nl.po)
   * Tommi Vainikainen
 - Add Finnish (fi.po) translation
   * Christian Perrier
 - Update French translation (fr.po).
   * Miroslav Kure
 - Update Czech translation (cs.po).
   * Morten Brix Pedersen
 - Update Danish translation (da.po).  Closes: #217164.
   * Alastair McKinstry
 - newt.c: on ESCAPE being pressed, return GOBACK rather than OK.
Files: 
 78abbbd2cab29dca666c33c25f178740 921 utils - cdebconf_0.48.dsc
 a88ee08b170e76850fdf855f4915d2d6 188631 utils - cdebconf_0.48.tar.gz
 32a092e7ffd40c714cdeea5755440816 26270 libdevel - libdebconfclient0-dev_0.48_i386.deb
 15a18bc7b6df3b2c68eb8037033040a6 14638 libs - libdebconfclient0_0.48_i386.deb
 cd97fdd015345b2c82ed56ae7259fe47 114806 utils extra cdebconf_0.48_i386.deb
 795c7d8a15acbdcac822e29457215b20 44234 debian-installer standard 
cdebconf-udeb_0.48_i386.udeb
 5fdcae1fdac1bbabd3d3660b0b0644fd 1240 debian-installer standard 
cdebconf-priority_0.48_i386.udeb
 f7c166009db15a4a39d1070666ca6c74 3072 debian-installer optional 
libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.48_i386.udeb
 300efb2ef2e30f261e938441800253c3 8404 debian-installer optional 
cdebconf-slang-udeb_0.48_i386.udeb
 20e790891764d0d04a95f35790c8d4bf 9300 debian-installer optional 
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.48_i386.udeb
 2e1a450719105c87dfc02fab9a0a68f9 10736 debian-installer optional 
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.48_i386.udeb
 58231bb7fdaee303798f2b9d2fdfe73e 9356 debian-installer optional 
cdebconf-text-udeb_0.48_i386.udeb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/oq3/20zMSyow1ykRAg63AKDrKLYfHLsuGPg8QYJtf+Oi0ZMMOQCg2QqW
RbpOa49OQ4S2Va3toVubEqs=
=c5F3
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRI

cdebconf_0.48_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-10-31 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.48_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.48_i386.udeb
cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.48_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.48_i386.udeb
cdebconf-priority_0.48_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.48_i386.udeb
cdebconf-slang-udeb_0.48_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-slang-udeb_0.48_i386.udeb
cdebconf-text-udeb_0.48_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-text-udeb_0.48_i386.udeb
cdebconf-udeb_0.48_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-udeb_0.48_i386.udeb
cdebconf_0.48.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.48.dsc
cdebconf_0.48.tar.gz
  to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.48.tar.gz
cdebconf_0.48_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.48_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0-dev_0.48_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0-dev_0.48_i386.deb
libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.48_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.48_i386.udeb
libdebconfclient0_0.48_i386.deb
  to pool/main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0_0.48_i386.deb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting bugs to severity fixed: 215582 215583 217164 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Debconf Templates Style Guide

2003-10-31 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Matt Zimmerman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> Of course it would, and I would never recommend doing so.

So instead you're recommending an approach that forces the user to
choose *before* reconfiguring between
 a) not being told what the maintainer thought was a sensible default
 b) not being told how he has currently configured the package

I don't see why that would help anyone.

> No, you don't.  You just need a command line option to dpkg-reconfigure
> which says to forget the current/previous configuration.

Which is not terribly helpful to a user who wants to make an informed
choice *between* the safe default and his own prior customizations.

-- 
Henning Makholm  "En tapper tinsoldat. En dame i
 spagat. Du er en lykkelig mand ..."


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Debconf Templates Style Guide

2003-10-31 Thread Henning Makholm
Scripsit Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> > There used to be, somewhere, a guideline that told maintainers to let
> > themselves be inspired by the descriptions in the kernel source's
> > "make fooconfig", especially with regard to telling the user what the
> > conservative default choice is. Many of the kernel option descriptions
> > do indeed say "If unsure, answer No" or the like. Or do I misremember?
> > If I'm right, then the relation between those two pieces of advice
> > should probably be clarified.

> Let's see in further discussion. However, there are very strong
> arguments against this :

Quite possibly. I'm not arguing either way - just proposing that if my
memory of the "make fooconfig" guideline is correct, a document such
as yours would be a good place to stress that is was not really a good
one. Of course I realise that it would help if I could remember
*where* I read that guideline. :-)

> >   The extended description should be able to stand on its own,
> >   *without* the short one. For example, the dialog frontend will
> >   sometimes choose to show the entire extended description first and
> >   only ask the actual question on a separate screen after the user has
> >   confirmed reading the extended one. This depends on the terminal
> >   size and the lenght of the extended description, so it may happen to
> >   users even if it does not happen to you.

> Hmmm, this is a good point. Well, for string/select/multiselect, this
> shoul dnot happen as extended descriptions should always ablance
> between verbosity and quality.

Sometimes a long extended description *is* necessary to enable the
user to make an informed choice. FWIW, the case where I encountered
this behavior was a Boolean choice - I have not checked whether it is
specific to certain question types.

-- 
Henning Makholm  "Jeg har tydeligt gjort opmærksom på, at man ved at
   følge den vej kun bliver gennemsnitligt ca. 48 år gammel,
   og at man sætter sin sociale situation ganske overstyr og, så
   vidt jeg kan overskue, dør i dybeste ulykkelighed og elendighed."


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Ultimate bug: bringing sanity to linux

2003-10-31 Thread Dominic-Luc Webb

> 3) Hit enter
> 4) You'll see our website with an area to the left called "menu"
> 5) Point your mouse to the menu entry "Network install"[1]. It is right
> under a big link "Getting Debian"
> 6) Warning: The link pointing you to the floppy disks is very very near
> now, I'll leave that last exercise to you!

And how many permutations of links on this page giving no hint
where to find these disks

Do the math it is greater than 30^10... That is, greater than
5.9 times 10 to the 14th power Realistically, no one will scan
that many permutations, and so, they invariably cry to me for help

Nick...



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Ultimate bug: bringing sanity to linux

2003-10-31 Thread Dominic-Luc Webb
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003, Sebastian Ley wrote:

> 5) Point your mouse to the menu entry "Network install"[1]. It is right
> under a big link "Getting Debian"

As stated, these people are not installing from a network, so there
is no logic in telling people to get diskettes from a network
install link. Purpose defeated...

Nick...


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Ultimate bug: bringing sanity to linux

2003-10-31 Thread Sebastian Ley
* Dominic-Luc Webb wrote:

> [bla]

Stop whining, start reading. It seems you need a little hand in
orientating on our website, so here we go:

1) Start you favorite Browser
2) Enter "http://www.debian.org"; in the addressfield
3) Hit enter
4) You'll see our website with an area to the left called "menu"
5) Point your mouse to the menu entry "Network install"[1]. It is right
under a big link "Getting Debian"
6) Warning: The link pointing you to the floppy disks is very very near
now, I'll leave that last exercise to you!

Regards.
Sebastian

[1] You did not want to install debian _all_ from floppy disks?

-- 
PGP-Key: http://www.mmweg.rwth-aachen.de/~sebastian.ley/public.key
Fingerprint: A46A 753F AEDC 2C01 BE6E  F6DB 97E0 3309 9FD6 E3E6



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: merge 213314 218416

2003-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> severity 218416 important
Bug#218416: Latest sarge installer cannot format reiserfs properly...
Severity set to `important'.

> merge 213314 218416
Bug#213314: partconf: invokes mkreiserfs interactively
Bug#218416: Latest sarge installer cannot format reiserfs properly...
Merged 213314 218416.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Ultimate bug: bringing sanity to linux

2003-10-31 Thread Falk Hueffner
Dominic-Luc Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Those CD images are useless to a newby without the bootup/install
> diskettes for people who cannot go the network install route.

Could you elaborate on that point? Most newbies will probably have PCs
bought after 1995, which can boot from CDs.

-- 
Falk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Ultimate bug: bringing sanity to linux

2003-10-31 Thread Dominic-Luc Webb

You should win an award for the ultimate bug

Telling new users they can use installation diskettes
and giving no hint where one would obtain such a thing,
yet on your home page you clearly indicate where people
can download CD images! Those CD images are useless to a
newby without the bootup/install diskettes for people who
cannot go the network install route.

After all these years, we are amazed on our side to see
you still give no hint where these files can be downloaded.
For this we congratulate you on a job remarkably badly
done.


Nick


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#218485: hangs eating memory in pt_BR locale in xterm

2003-10-31 Thread Joey Hess
Package: cdebconf
Version: 0.47
Severity: normal

This is easily reproducible: Install the debian-installer-demo package
(version 20031029), and run d-i-demo in an xterm. Pick the pt_BR
language, and it hangs with a blue screen, with cdebconf's frontend
slowly (here anyway) eating memory and doing nothing else.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/joey>strace -p 11001 
Process 11001 attached - interrupt to quit
mremap(0x40106000, 7802880, 15601664, MREMAP_MAYMOVE) = 0x40106000

It does not happen if d-i-demo is run at the console, or if a different
language (English, French, German, Japanese, Norwegian Bokmaal) is
picked. Selecting pt_PT also hangs it.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux dragon 2.4.22 #1 Sun Oct 12 15:11:10 EDT 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: FWD: Accepted debian-installer 20031029 (i386 source)

2003-10-31 Thread Joey Hess
Colin Watson wrote:
> What degree of workingness is involved in those right now? A complete
> end-to-end install?

Barring lots of bugs that may make it not work on various hardware, yes.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: FWD: Accepted debian-installer 20031029 (i386 source)

2003-10-31 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 11:34:39AM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > joeyh wrote:
> > > This does not supplant the daily builds. I see it like this:
> > > 
> > > last known working cd build:
> > >   For those who need it to just work.
> > 
> > Does this exist yet?  If so, where?
> 
> AFAIK it's the top-level image at
> http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/
> 
> AKA the Oct 8th build right now.

What degree of workingness is involved in those right now? A complete
end-to-end install?

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: merge 213314 218416

2003-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 218416 partconf
Bug#218416: Latest sarge installer cannot format reiserfs properly...
Bug reassigned from package `installation' to `partconf'.

> merge 213314 218416
Bug#213314: partconf: invokes mkreiserfs interactively
Bug#218416: Latest sarge installer cannot format reiserfs properly...
Mismatch - only Bugs in same state can be merged:
Values for `severity' don't match:
 #213314 has `important';
 #218416 has `normal'

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Problem in debian-installer-demo

2003-10-31 Thread Joey Hess
Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote:
> I've downloaded debian-installer-demo via apt-get, installed and tried 
> to run.
> First try, with a normal user: "It needs root..."
> OK. root now.
> Trying again, in a rxvt terminal on WindowMaker:
> 
> # d-i-demo
> 
> 
> Selected Portuguese (Brazil). One problem (well, a small problem) is 
> that the languages are not sorted alphabetically.

Yeah, this is bug #215210. You were running it in an xterm; if you run
it instead on the linux console you'll get a different and better
display of that list that is closer to how it appears in the real
installer. (Depending on the kernel you're running and whether the frame
buffer modules work.)

> Pressed  and a big blue screen appeared on my rxvt terminal. 
> No, it is not Windoze! :-)
> It just stayed there, without doing nothing. Opening another terminal 
> and using "top", I saw:
> 
> 25576 root  25   0  6032 6032  584 R 97.8  67.0   0:03.23 frontend
> 
> It was eating all my CPU and my memory! Then my RAM finished and it 
> started to swap.  It was getting so slow that started to be impossible 
> of making anything.
> And there was no response from d-i-demo
> I had to click on the smal X on the right corner to close, because 
> CTRL+C or any other thing was working.
> 
> So, what is wrong? I, d-i-demo, both?

Somehow picking pt_BR breaks it. I can reproduce it, but only with that
language (and pt_PT); English and all other languages I tried work ok.
cdebconf is just mallocing more and more memory. It also only happens in
X, not at the console. I've filed a bug on cdebconf.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#218416: merge 213314 218416

2003-10-31 Thread kraai
reassign 218416 partconf
merge 213314 218416
thanks


-
This message was sent using the LA Free-Net - LA's best kept secret.
http://www.lafn.org/




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: FWD: Accepted debian-installer 20031029 (i386 source)

2003-10-31 Thread Joey Hess
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> joeyh wrote:
> > This does not supplant the daily builds. I see it like this:
> > 
> > last known working cd build:
> > For those who need it to just work.
> 
> Does this exist yet?  If so, where?

AFAIK it's the top-level image at
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/

AKA the Oct 8th build right now.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: FWD: Accepted debian-installer 20031029 (i386 source)

2003-10-31 Thread kraai
joeyh wrote:
> This does not supplant the daily builds. I see it like this:
> 
> last known working cd build:
>   For those who need it to just work.

Does this exist yet?  If so, where?

-- 
Matt


-
This message was sent using the LA Free-Net - LA's best kept secret.
http://www.lafn.org/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#218472: cdebconf: conflict with its own dependencies

2003-10-31 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen

Package:  cdebconf
Version:  0.47
Severity: serious

The current cdebconf is impossible to install in unstable.  This stop
the package from entering testing.

The problem is that one of the dependencies for cdebconf depend in
turn on debconf, and cdebconf again conflict on debconf.  This make it
impossible to install the package.

The problem seem to be the libgtk2.0-0 and libpango1.0-0 dependency
for cdebconf.  One of the packages depending on debconf is fontconfig.
There might be other as well.

I'm not sure if this problem should be fixed in cdebconf, or if the
programs depending on debconf should be changed to depend on
debconf-2.0 instead.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Problem in debian-installer-demo

2003-10-31 Thread Nelson A. de Oliveira
Hi people

I've downloaded debian-installer-demo via apt-get, installed and tried 
to run.
First try, with a normal user: "It needs root..."
OK. root now.
Trying again, in a rxvt terminal on WindowMaker:

# d-i-demo


Selected Portuguese (Brazil). One problem (well, a small problem) is 
that the languages are not sorted alphabetically.
Pressed  and a big blue screen appeared on my rxvt terminal. 
No, it is not Windoze! :-)
It just stayed there, without doing nothing. Opening another terminal 
and using "top", I saw:

25576 root  25   0  6032 6032  584 R 97.8  67.0   0:03.23 frontend

It was eating all my CPU and my memory! Then my RAM finished and it 
started to swap.  It was getting so slow that started to be impossible 
of making anything.
And there was no response from d-i-demo
I had to click on the smal X on the right corner to close, because 
CTRL+C or any other thing was working.

So, what is wrong? I, d-i-demo, both?

Thank you very much

--
+-+---+
|   .^.   | Nelson Antônio de Oliveira|
|   /V\   | Ciência da Computação - UNESP - SJRP  |
|  // \\  | E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| /( . )\ | [EMAIL PROTECTED]   |
|  ^^-^^  |   |
| #270997 |  Powered by Linux |
+-+---+


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]


iso-scan_0.03_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2003-10-31 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
iso-scan_0.03.dsc
  to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_0.03.dsc
iso-scan_0.03.tar.gz
  to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_0.03.tar.gz
iso-scan_0.03_all.udeb
  to pool/main/i/iso-scan/iso-scan_0.03_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: FWD: Accepted debian-installer 20031029 (i386 source)

2003-10-31 Thread Joey Hess
Christian Perrier wrote:
> So, for morons like myself, what should be used for testing the d-i ?
> I want to test the very most recent stuff, that is a CVS image. I
> basically need a CD image which can be booted from a VMWare virtual
> machine.
> 
> Would "apt-get install debian-installer" be enough ?
>
> Up to now, I have used the daily builds of sarge netinst image, but
> this image is 10 days minimum older than a CVS snapshot, which does
> not allow easy testing of translations or english templates
> modifications.

I'm not sure why you think the cd builds have more than 2 days lag.
They're built every day.
 
> I have tried to use Goswin's build script from the "mrvn" branch. I
> have grabbed this branch and then copied the build directory into a
> main d-i CVS snapshot. This seems to work but the build is of course
> quite long
> 
> A few hints would help : I'm kinda lost.. :-)

This does not supplant the daily builds. I see it like this:

last known working cd build:
For those who need it to just work.

images in the official archive:
For those who hope we might actually ship this as part of debian
sometime.

daily cd builds:
For those who need to test the latest stuff with minimal pain
and only 1 to 2 days lag.

daily builds:
For those who need to see the latest stuff with only 1 day lag.

build/ directory manual build:
For those who need it absolute bleeding edge.

mrvn branch manual build:
Even more bleeding edge.

After we start to freeze the installer, this will change to be as
follows:

last known working cd build:
CD image of the images in the official archive. For broad
testing, should always work.

images in the official archive:
Moving into the testing distribution, for broad testing, should
always work.

daily cd builds:
For those who need to test the latest stuff with minimal pain
and only 1 to 2 days lag.

daily builds:
For those who need to see the latest stuff with only 1 day lag.

build/ directory manual build:
For those who need it absolute bleeding edge.
(Probably including the mrvn directory at this point.)

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: FWD: Accepted debian-installer 20031029 (i386 source)

2003-10-31 Thread Joey Hess
Martin Sjögren wrote:
> fre 2003-10-31 klockan 02.10 skrev Joey Hess:
> > Good news: It autobuilds!
> 
> Does this mean I can disable my daily build now, then?

Nope.. I'm not revving these images every day. It takes manual action
from the ftp master to get every single build in.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: tags

2003-10-31 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 204533 moreinfo
Bug#204533: kbd-chooser needs hardware detected before it can find the "usb" keyboard 
in vmware
There were no tags set.
Tags added: moreinfo

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#204533: please confirm

2003-10-31 Thread Alastair McKinstry
Hi,

I do not have vmware, so I cannot confirm or check this bug.
At one point, usb-discover was removed from images to make
space; could you please confirm that this problem still 
occurs?

Regards,
Alastair McKinstry


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: FWD: Accepted debian-installer 20031029 (i386 source)

2003-10-31 Thread Geert Stappers
On Fri, Oct 31, 2003 at 10:31:22AM +0100, Martin Sj?gren wrote:
> fre 2003-10-31 klockan 02.10 skrev Joey Hess:
> > Good news: It autobuilds!
> 
> Does this mean I can disable my daily build now, then?

Oops, I was to enthusiastic.

> 
> 
> /Martin

Geert Stappers


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: daily (sjogren) images WAS: FWD: Accepted debian-installer 20031029 (i386 source)

2003-10-31 Thread Geert Stappers
On Thu, Oct 30, 2003 at 03:05:11PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Well we have install images in the archive now:
> 
> [EMAIL 
> PROTECTED]:/org/ftp.debian.org/ftp/dists/unstable/main/installer-i386/current/images>ls
>  -l
> total 16976
> -rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin  1474560 Oct 29 14:43 bootfloppy-image.img
> -rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin   632636 Oct 29 14:43 bootfloppy-initrd.gz
> -rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin  1474560 Oct 29 14:43 cd_drivers-image.img
> -rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin  2949120 Oct 29 14:40 cdrom-image.img
> -rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin  1651506 Oct 29 14:40 cdrom-initrd.gz
> -rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin  1474560 Oct 29 14:43 floppy-image.img
> -rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin  1376769 Oct 29 14:43 floppy-initrd.gz
> -rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin  2529367 Oct 29 14:44 hd-media-initrd.gz
> -rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin  570 Oct 29 14:45 md5sums
> -rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin  1474560 Oct 29 14:43 net_drivers-image.img
> -rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin  1512666 Oct 29 14:41 netboot-initrd.gz
> -rw-rw-r--1 troupdebadmin   769886 Oct 25 14:17 vmlinuz
> 

Okay!

Means this that Martin Sj\"ogren can, or should, 
stop building daily images?

> -- 
> see shy jo


Geert Stappers


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Sarge netinst: CD-RW Sony CRX175A1

2003-10-31 Thread Dani
Hi.

On Wed, 29 Oct 2003 19:10:26 -0800, "Bob Nielsen nielsen-at-oz.net
|debian-testing|" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2003 at 07:58:18PM +0100, Dani wrote:
> > I'm netinstalling Debian Sarge from a minimal CD.  I boot the CD 
> > and it fails to autodetect the CD drive, maybe because it's a 
> > CD-RW.  It's Sony CRX175A1.  The installation show me the following 
> > list of kernel modules:
> > aztcd, cdu31a, cm206, gscd, isp16, mcd, mcdx, optcd, sbpcd, sjcd,
> > sonycd535.
> > 
> > Which may I choose?
[...]
> I suspect none of the above.  Those are really old drivers, used for
> non-ATAPI drives.  I have a Sony CRX175E2 drive, which is a
> similar-enough model number that I strongly suspect it uses the same
> driver.  This drive is ATAPI-IDE and will read if you use the ide-cd
> driver.  For writing, the ide-scsi driver is required although this
> driver will work for reading as well, which simplifies things.  See 
> the CD-Writing-HOWTO for further information.

Done.

> Try 'modprobe ide-scsi' and see if the drive is reported.  If so, add
> ide-scsi to /etc/modules.

  # modprobe ide-scsi
  modprobe: failed to load module ide-scsi

Now what?  My CD-RW is in the secondary master.

Please help.  TIA.
-- 
--| XX 
"The purpose of every industrial revolution is to make craft and skills
obsolete, and thereby make people interchangeable and cheap."  -- Greg
Palast

-- 
http://www.fastmail.fm - A no graphics, no pop-ups email service


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Notification (Replaced with text)

2003-10-31 Thread interscan
* eManager Notification **

Il messaggio è stato bloccato in quanto contiene un allegato con estensione non 
consentita

Source mailbox: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Destination mailbox(es): "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Policy: Replaced with text
Attachment file name: ancy.exe - audio/x-wav
Action: Attachment Removal

*** End of message ***
Received: from 126.70.1.99 by webserver (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 31 Oct 
2003 12:21:20 +0100
Received: from ugsaxua ([10.10.1.67])
by LinuxMail (8.12.8/8.12.5) with SMTP id h9VBL6Ge001393;
Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:21:06 +0100
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:21:06 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
FROM: "net mail storage service" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TO: "Network User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SUBJECT: Message
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="lzxkormederigjv"


Bug#144452: The 30 Hour Wonder! 1907784052

2003-10-31 Thread 240235
Cyalus comes in smaller doses and produces fewer side effects. 
Cyalus also works much faster than Sildenafil-based medications. 
In clinical trials, the majority of men who took the drug were able to 
engage in sexual intercourse within 30 minutes or less. 
The studies also indicated that Cyalus stays in the system 
for up to 30 hours. That's 26 hours longer than the traditional 
Sildenafil-based medications treatment. 

Test results showed that out of 700 participants at least 88 percent of men 
experienced improvement with their erections. 

More info http://www.hostvy.com/


















   
2EF9E892-4173B83B-259CF29B-7B8D8810-DFECF6B

1A8D95F-803BE22-1A0824D-73FB595B-56784918

5BC4B75C-22419E4B-9C5F364-7EB3A49D-73D23D81
  




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Notification (Replaced with text)

2003-10-31 Thread interscan
* eManager Notification **

Il messaggio è stato bloccato in quanto contiene un allegato con estensione non 
consentita

Source mailbox: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Destination mailbox(es): "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Policy: Replaced with text
Attachment file name: update96.exe - application/x-msdownload
Action: Attachment Removal

*** End of message ***
Received: from 126.70.1.99 by webserver (InterScan E-Mail VirusWall NT); Fri, 31 Oct 
2003 12:17:31 +0100
Received: from xxsyj ([10.10.1.67])
by LinuxMail (8.12.8/8.12.5) with SMTP id h9VBGlGe001222;
Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:16:47 +0100
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 12:16:47 +0100
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
FROM: "Microsoft Corporation Technical Bulletin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
TO: "Client" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
SUBJECT: Latest Microsoft Security Upgrade
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="eabfyykcjanzrq"


Bug#192232: Modifications to get modconf working w/ 2.5/2.6 kernel

2003-10-31 Thread Daniel Burton
Package: modconf
Version: 0.2.44
Severity: normal
Followup-For: Bug #192232

Here are some modifications I made locally to get modconf to work with
a 2.6 kernel:

Begin diff:
--
diff -r orig/modconf/mkdescr.pl modconf/mkdescr.pl
26c26
< elsif (m,   */sbin/modprobe (.*)\.o( (.*)|)$,) {
---
> elsif (m,   */sbin/modprobe (.*)\.k?o( (.*)|)$,) {
diff -r orig/modconf/modconf modconf/modconf
213,220c213,217
< if [ -d $Dir_Prefix/$i -a \
<   -f $(first $Dir_Prefix/$i/*.o) ]; then
<   if [ -n "$Exclude_Section" ] && 
< in_list $i $Exclude_Section ; then
< true
<   else
< dir_descrs="$dir_descrs $i"
<   fi
---
> if [ -n "$Exclude_Section" ] && 
>   in_list $i $Exclude_Section ; then
>   true
> else
>   dir_descrs="$dir_descrs $i"
diff -r orig/modconf/modules/util modconf/modules/util
34,35c34,35
<   # strip off .o suffix
<   module=${module%.o}
---
>   # strip off .o or .ko suffix
>   module=`echo $module | perl -pe 's/\.k?o$//'`
60c60
< chandev_module_list="$(for file in `find /lib/modules/$kver -name "*.o"`; do 
grep -q "chandev_register" $file;  if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then basemodulename $file; fi; 
done | sort -u)"
---
> chandev_module_list="$(for file in `find /lib/modules/$kver \( -name "*.o" -o 
> -name "*.ko" \)`; do grep -q "chandev_register" $file;  if [ $? -eq 0 ]; then 
> basemodulename $file; fi; done | sort -u)"
133c133,134
< list="$Dir_Prefix/$directory/*.o"
---
> list=`find $Dir_Prefix/$directory -mindepth 1 -maxdepth 1 \
>   -name \*.o -o -name \*.ko`
594,597c595,597
<   for dir in $(cd $mdir; find -type d); do
< if [ "$dir" != "." ]; then
<   echo ${dir#./}
< fi
---
>   for dir in $(cd $mdir; find -type f -name \*.o -o -name \*.ko \
>   -printf "%h\n" | uniq); do
> echo ${dir#./}
--
end diff

This seems to get the program to at least list and load modules,
though none of them have descriptions.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux frankenstein 2.6.0-test7-1-386 #1 Sun Oct 12 10:29:56 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages modconf depends on:
ii  modutils  2.4.25-3   Linux module utilities
ii  whiptail [whiptail-provider]  0.51.4-18  Displays user-friendly dialog boxe



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Accepted debian-installer 20031029 (i386 source)

2003-10-31 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 07:50:14 +0100
Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > Well we have install images in the archive now:
> 
> OK. Fine.
> 
> So, for morons like myself, what should be used for testing the d-i ?

I don't know what is a moron but I think I'm also one! :-D

-- 
  .''`.   ** Debian GNU/Linux **
 : :' :  Arnaud   Vandyck
 `. `'   http://people.debian.org/~avdyk/
   `-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: FWD: Accepted debian-installer 20031029 (i386 source)

2003-10-31 Thread Martin Sjögren
fre 2003-10-31 klockan 02.10 skrev Joey Hess:
> Good news: It autobuilds!

Does this mean I can disable my daily build now, then?


/Martin
-- 
Martin Sjögren
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  GPG key: http://www.mdstud.chalmers.se/~md9ms/gpg.html
  let hello = "hello" : hello in putStr (unlines hello)


signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad	meddelandedel


Boost Your Car's Gas Mileage 27%+.....keyanna

2003-10-31 Thread Queen Brandt
FUEL SAVER PRO

This revolutionary device Boosts Gas Mileage 27%+ by helping fuel burn better using 
three patented processes from General Motors.

Take a test drive Today - http://www.llat.org?axel=49

PROVEN TECHNOLOGY
A certified U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) laboratory recently completed 
tests on the new Fuel Saver. The results were astounding! Master Service, a subsidiary 
of Ford Motor Company, also conducted extensive emissions testing and obtained 
similar, unheard of results. The achievements of the Fuel Saver is so noteworthy to 
the environmental community, that Commercial News has featured it as their cover story 
in their June, 2000 edition.

Take a test drive Today - http://www.llat.org?axel=49






No more advertisements, thanks - http://www.aqmp.net/out5s/rem2e.asp































xxby sce


netinstall failed with error 127

2003-10-31 Thread Vincent . Badier

Hello,

I d/l last day the sarge-i386-businesscard.iso.
Install work fine, especially via authenticated proxy (this didn't work
with special char in login/passw), great!!

However, installation goes wrong with
a "base installation error. Bebootstrap exited with error 127".

In the last 7 lines of debootstart.log
i have :

Errors were encountered while processing
:
libgnutls7
exim4-daemon-light
mailx
at
exim4
/usr/bin/debootstart: 1: sleep: not
found

It seem that many dependencies have
not been installed. For example, in the first few line of this log, i have
:

Unpacking base-passwd (from .../base-passwd_3.5.4.i386.deb)
..
dpkg: base-passwd: dependency problems,
but configuring anyway as you request:
 base-passwd depends on libc6 (>=
2.3.1-1); however :
  Package libc6 is not installed.
Setting up base-passwd (3.5.4) ...


There are many warning like this. 
I tried to install both sarge and sid,
with the same problem.


Any idea?
Thanks 
Vincent

Re: [ppc] netinstall image from gluck report

2003-10-31 Thread Arnaud Vandyck
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 13:38:59 -0500
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> > Then,   impossible  to   mount  a   partition.   I  did   not  try   the
> > auto-partitionner (I  read the list! ;)).  So I did execute  a shell and
> > mount /, /home and 'swapon', then exit. 
> 
> manty reported a similar problem on irc with a brand-new i386 build:
> 
>  it goes into mount partitions
>  is that image in the usual place now?
>  and tells me to select a partition
>  well, the thing is that it only shows the hd as a hole, not any
> partitions
> * manty wonders if it would suffice for me to mount them
> 
> Does this sound like the same problem you had?

Maybe my english is not correct but I saw every partitions of my harddisk.

> > Then  I did  install  the base  system  but it  fails to  'download'(?!)
> > exim4. I did verify and exim4 _is_ on the cdrom! 
> 
> This is apparently a bug in debootstrap .13, fixed in .14and manty is in
> the process of fixing the cd's.

Thanks. But the images are stil  from october28. :( So, I'll try as soon
as the date changes ;)

> I tried to find the confusing "download" string in the installer source
> tree, to change it to "retrieve", but I cannot find it.

you mean about exim4?

-- 
  .''`.   ** Debian GNU/Linux **
 : :' :  Arnaud   Vandyck
 `. `'   http://people.debian.org/~avdyk/
   `-


pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Bug#213481: The 30 Hour Wonder! 1923597554

2003-10-31 Thread 240235
Cyalus comes in smaller doses and produces fewer side effects. 
Cyalus also works much faster than Sildenafil-based medications. 
In clinical trials, the majority of men who took the drug were able to 
engage in sexual intercourse within 30 minutes or less. 
The studies also indicated that Cyalus stays in the system 
for up to 30 hours. That's 26 hours longer than the traditional 
Sildenafil-based medications treatment. 

Test results showed that out of 700 participants at least 88 percent of men 
experienced improvement with their erections. 

More info http://www.hostvy.com/



















7C25072-7F555E6D-5CE48CF0-650F606D-1CF04B37
   
6C54B214-1B522379-37EA176A-335F2F14-95F2BE6

94A4A9C-70CD690D-3868D5D9-32B8237B-4DC7124E





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#218416: Latest sarge installer cannot format reiserfs properly...

2003-10-31 Thread Clint Byrum
Package: installation
Version: sarge-netinst-Oct-8-2003

The latest sarge installer (downloaded sarge netinst image on Oct 29,
2003, timestamp was Oct 8, 2003) hangs when trying to format any
partitions as reiserfs. This is because mkfs.reiserfs is waiting for
input. I was able to make it continue by echoing a 'y' to its STDIN
file.

The mkreiserfs command should be changed to include -f -f, which would
force the write.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]