cdrom-detect_0.49_i386.changes ACCEPTED

[Debian Installer]

Accepted:
cdrom-detect_0.49.dsc
  to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.49.dsc
cdrom-detect_0.49.tar.gz
  to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.49.tar.gz
cdrom-detect_0.49_all.udeb
  to pool/main/c/cdrom-detect/cdrom-detect_0.49_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of cdrom-detect_0.49_i386.changes

[Archive Administrator]

cdrom-detect_0.49_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  cdrom-detect_0.49.dsc
  cdrom-detect_0.49.tar.gz
  cdrom-detect_0.49_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#152152: clamorous .

[Armand Boyce]

Top quality software stripped from it's Expensive.
Extra's gives you the lowest Possible price - Guaran1eed!
http://www.goodsoftwarenow.biz/lnow/?florican
The 10 All-Time Best Software Products at Rock Bottom Prices!

-s-t-o-p-
http://goodsoftwarenow.biz/re/clean.php?bear

Bug#235364: marked as done (partman needs a progress bar at startup)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Tue, 2 Mar 2004 00:11:26 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Fixed in NMU of partman 12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Feb 2004 23:58:10 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 28 15:58:10 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AxELS-0007r2-00; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 15:58:10 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs21-20.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.20])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0DAF17FCE
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 23:58:08 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 5A9E16F3B0; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:58:16 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:58:16 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: partman needs a progress bar at startup
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.48
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
X-Spam-Level: 


--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: partman
Severity: wishlist
Tags: d-i

Like the subject says, partman needs a progress bar at startup. Even one
that jumped from 0 to 100 would go a long way toward assauging people's
fears of blue screens with nothing on them.

-- System Information:
Found unknown policy: ('1', 'pool')Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US

--=20
see shy jo

--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAQSsXd8HHehbQuO8RAs6EAJwORtGsyKOa6ywK958bdIqzph5nvQCfVcJZ
NSMjjAHjsEZ/kDiJR3/JXXM=
=Tity
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--bg08WKrSYDhXBjb5--

---
Received: (at 235364-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2004 05:11:36 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 01 21:11:36 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ay2Bs-0004G8-00; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 21:11:36 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs17-86.access.naxs.com [216.98.94.86])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF3E11831D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue,  2 Mar 2004 05:11:32 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E65846F3EA; Tue,  2 Mar 2004 00:11:26 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 00:11:26 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fixed in NMU of partman 12
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
X-Spam-Level: 


--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

> tag 235364 + fixed
>=20
> quit
>=20
> This message was generated automatically in response to a
> non

Bug#235378: marked as done (automatic partitioning has undocumented partitiong scheme entry thing)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:47:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#235378: fixed in partman-auto 6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Feb 2004 00:15:39 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 28 16:15:39 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AxEcN-qN-00; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:15:39 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs21-20.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.20])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC82A17FCE
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00:15:37 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 67F9B6F3B0; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:15:53 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:15:53 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: automatic partitioning has undocumented partitiong scheme entry thing
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.48
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
X-Spam-Level: 


--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: partman
Severity: minor
Tags: d-i

I am not l33t enough to use the "manually enter the partitioning
scheme (for experts only)". So who is? :-)
 =20
Anton said something about hiding this.

-- System Information:
Found unknown policy: ('1', 'pool')Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US

--=20
see shy jo

--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAQS85d8HHehbQuO8RArRhAJ9LypBg32qIAG36a1/L16djsw0+eACffRgi
uvdz97qexmrYRd5YVl1qEO8=
=L49q
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--OXfL5xGRrasGEqWY--

---
Received: (at 235378-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2004 04:53:03 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 01 20:53:03 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ay1tv-0002cE-00; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 20:53:03 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ay1o8-0003cC-00; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:47:04 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.44 $
Subject: Bug#235378: fixed in partman-auto 6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:47:04 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: partman-auto
Source-Version: 6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-auto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman-auto_6.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_6.dsc
partman-auto_6.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_6.tar.gz
partman-auto_6_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_6_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Joey Hess <

Bug#235374: marked as done (autopartitioning does not mark swap as swap)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:47:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#235374: fixed in partman-auto 6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Feb 2004 00:11:42 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 28 16:11:42 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AxEYY-e5-00; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:11:42 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs21-20.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.20])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A05C17FCE
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00:11:41 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id DBECB6F3B0; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:11:56 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:11:56 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: autopartitioning does not mark swap as swap
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.48
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
X-Spam-Level: 


--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: partman
Severity: important
Tags: d-i

I picked /, /home, and swap scheme. This gave me a primary partition
for / , a 2.1 gb logical partitoon (#5) that did not have a mount
point assigned, and partition #6 was /home. If I commit that, it
complains that partition #5 has no mount point assigned.

Anton says that the empty partition was supposed to be set up as swap space.

-- System Information:
Found unknown policy: ('1', 'pool')Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US

--=20
see shy jo

--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAQS5Md8HHehbQuO8RAiv6AJ9MhzqxALQQnnc2sc8jVUkrLhbHTQCgyxAA
RJZLRs+5RnFARLe1EmfB8nY=
=O2MZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--opJtzjQTFsWo+cga--

---
Received: (at 235374-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2004 04:52:55 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 01 20:52:55 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ay1tn-0002bY-00; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 20:52:55 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ay1o8-0003cA-00; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:47:04 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.44 $
Subject: Bug#235374: fixed in partman-auto 6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:47:04 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: partman-auto
Source-Version: 6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-auto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman-auto_6.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_6.dsc
partman-auto_6.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_6.tar.gz
partman-auto_6_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_6_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments p

Bug#235373: marked as done (strage /var/lib thing in the automatic partitioning menu)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:47:04 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#235373: fixed in partman-auto 6
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Feb 2004 00:10:45 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Feb 28 16:10:45 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AxEXd-Y0-00; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 16:10:45 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (pm3naxs21-20.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.20])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A68F17FCE
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 00:10:44 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id C3E826F3B0; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:10:59 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 19:10:59 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: strage /var/lib thing in the automatic partitioning menu
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.48
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
X-Spam-Level: 


--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Package: partman
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i

If I pick automatic partitioning from the main partman menu, the
second item in the menu is "Use IDE1 master -  entirely/var/lib"
I don't know what that /var/lib is doing there, and it seems that more
may have been truncated by cdebconf on display.

-- System Information:
Found unknown policy: ('1', 'pool')Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.25
Locale: LANG=3Den_US, LC_CTYPE=3Den_US

--=20
see shy jo

--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAQS4Td8HHehbQuO8RApYVAJ98utzzQuXSeTfNnDFbxNd3R5A9wwCgmqOV
wpwdFsSHKkuht3Sk6xUpxMc=
=WhoZ
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

--IS0zKkzwUGydFO0o--

---
Received: (at 235373-close) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Mar 2004 04:52:56 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 01 20:52:56 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ay1to-0002bl-00; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 20:52:56 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ay1o8-0003c8-00; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:47:04 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.44 $
Subject: Bug#235373: fixed in partman-auto 6
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:47:04 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_01
X-Spam-Level: 

Source: partman-auto
Source-Version: 6

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-auto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman-auto_6.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_6.dsc
partman-auto_6.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_6.tar.gz
partman-auto_6_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_6_all.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the 

partman-auto override disparity

[Debian Installer]

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

partman-auto_6_all.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why.

[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one
like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore
this mail.  Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in
due course, but until then the installer will send these automated
mails; sorry.]

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

partman-ext3 override disparity

[Debian Installer]

There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

partman-ext3_10_i386.udeb: package says priority is standard, override says optional.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why.

[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one
like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore
this mail.  Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in
due course, but until then the installer will send these automated
mails; sorry.]

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

partman-auto_6_i386.changes ACCEPTED

[Debian Installer]

Accepted:
partman-auto_6.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_6.dsc
partman-auto_6.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_6.tar.gz
partman-auto_6_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-auto/partman-auto_6_all.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Closing bugs: 235373 235374 235378 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

partman-ext3_10_i386.changes ACCEPTED

[Debian Installer]

Accepted:
partman-ext3_10.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_10.dsc
partman-ext3_10.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_10.tar.gz
partman-ext3_10_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-ext3/partman-ext3_10_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processed: Fixed in NMU of partman 12

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> tag 235364 + fixed
Bug#235364: partman needs a progress bar at startup
Tags were: pending d-i
Tags added: fixed

> quit
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-ext3_10_i386.changes

[Archive Administrator]

partman-ext3_10_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-ext3_10.dsc
  partman-ext3_10.tar.gz
  partman-ext3_10_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman-auto_6_i386.changes

[Archive Administrator]

partman-auto_6_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-auto_6.dsc
  partman-auto_6.tar.gz
  partman-auto_6_all.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

partman_12_i386.changes ACCEPTED

[Debian Installer]

Accepted:
partman_12.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_12.dsc
partman_12.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_12.tar.gz
partman_12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman/partman_12_i386.udeb
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Setting bugs to severity fixed: 235364 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fixed in NMU of partman 12

[Joey Hess]

tag 235364 + fixed

quit

This message was generated automatically in response to a
non-maintainer upload.  The .changes file follows.

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon,  1 Mar 2004 22:21:33 -0500
Source: partman
Binary: partman
Architecture: source i386
Version: 12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Changed-By: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Description: 
 partman- Partition the storage devices (partman) (udeb)
Closes: 235364
Changes: 
 partman (12) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Anton Zinoviev
 - new release
   * Joey Hess
 - reformatted the main screen
 - minor reformatting of the partition edit screen
 - rename hrule to divider
 - removed not very useful/redundant commit and abort choices from
   choose_partition
 - added a confirmation message on partman exit to make sure the user does
   not accidentially destroy his data
 - shorten title to work around cdebconf bug
 - change device_name to put the drive size before the device name
 - change menu item number to 42 so it's the default partitioner
   (should this only be on i386?)
 - add a progress bar while partman is starting up. Closes: #235364
   * Christian Perrier
 - Corrected typo in templates and unfuzzy translations
   * Translations :
 - Miguel Figueiredo
   - Updated Portuguese translation (pt.po)
 - Stefano Canepa
   - Translated new header by Joey Hess and a new string
 - Bartosz Fenski
   - Updated Polish translation (pl.po)
 - Pierre Machard/Christian Perrier
   - Updated French translation (fr.po)
 - André Luís Lopes
   - Updated Brazilian Portuguese translation (pt_BR.po)
 - Kęstutis Biliūnas
   - Updated Lithuanian translation (lt.po)
 - Håvard Korsvoll
   - Added Norwegian, nynorsk translation (nn.po).
 - Peter Mann
   - Updated Slovak translation (sk.po)
 - Carlos Z.F. Liu
   - update Simplified Chinese translation (zh_CN.po)
 - Elian Myftiu
   - Updated Albanian translation (sq.po)
 - Jordi Mallach
   - Updated Catalan translation (ca.po)
 - Miroslav Kure
   - Updated Czech translation (cs.po)
 - Konstantinos Margaritis
   - Updated Greek translation (el.po)
 - Dennis Stampfer
   - Update German translation (de.po)
 - Kenshi Muto
   - Updated Japanese translation (ja.po)
 - Changwoo Ryu
   - Updated Korean translation (ko.po)
 - Eugeniy Meshcheryakov
   - Updated Ukrainian translation (uk.po)
 - Claus Hindsgaul
   - Updated Danish translation (da.po)
 - Bart Cornelis
   - Updated Dutch translation (nl.po)
 - Javier Fernandez-Sanguino
   - Added Spanish translation (es.po)
 - Ming Hua
   - Initial Traditional Chinese translation (zh_TW.po), by Tetralet
   - Updated Traditional Chinese translation (zh_TW.po), by Tetralet
 - Konstantinos Margaritis
   - Updated Greek translation (el.po)
 - Dennis Stampfer
   - Update German translation (de.po)
 - Håvard Korsvoll
   - Added Norwegian, bokmål translation, (nb.po). From Axel Bojer
Files: 
 83642407672b9face77dbde25edd 624 debian-installer standard partman_12.dsc
 fbeab344ad5674d55cf37bbbd80a7bc8 49617 debian-installer standard partman_12.tar.gz
 41b7b68480d5221856e4b96f68c5ecaa 48488 debian-installer standard partman_12_i386.udeb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFARAl72tp5zXiKP0wRAhc4AJ9bIkvwMoByQhUThYIs6T1nxeaPEwCcCmeR
hi/yBRZ2fc7VfmsM3L8l5Rk=
=P0tq
-END PGP SIGNATURE-


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of partman_12_i386.changes

[Archive Administrator]

partman_12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman_12.dsc
  partman_12.tar.gz
  partman_12_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of debian-installer_20040302_i386.changes

[Archive Administrator]

debian-installer_20040302_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  debian-installer_20040302.dsc
  debian-installer_20040302.tar.gz
  debian-installer-demo_20040302_i386.deb
  debian-installer-images_20040302_i386.tar.gz

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

linux-kernel-di_0.41_source+i386+alpha+ia64+m68k+mips+mipsel+powerpc+sparc.changes is NEW

[Debian Installer]

affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.41_powerpc.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-di_0.41_powerpc.udeb
affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.41_powerpc.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/affs-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.41_powerpc.udeb
brltty-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.41_ia64.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/brltty-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.41_ia64.udeb
brltty-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.41_powerpc.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/brltty-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.41_powerpc.udeb
brltty-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/brltty-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
brltty-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.41_alpha.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/brltty-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.41_alpha.udeb
(new) brltty-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb extra debian-installer
Braille support
 This package contains Braille drivers for the Linux kernel.
brltty-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/brltty-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.41_ia64.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.41_ia64.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.41_powerpc.udeb
  to 
pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.41_powerpc.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.41_alpha.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.41_alpha.udeb
(new) cdrom-core-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb standard debian-installer
CDROM support
 This package contains core CDROM support for the Linux kernel.
cdrom-core-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
cdrom-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
cdrom-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.41_alpha.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.41_alpha.udeb
(new) cdrom-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb optional debian-installer
Esoteric CDROM drivers
 This package contains esoteric CDROM drivers for the Linux kernel.
cdrom-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/cdrom-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
ext3-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.41_ia64.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/ext3-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.41_ia64.udeb
ext3-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.41_powerpc.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/ext3-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.41_powerpc.udeb
ext3-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/ext3-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
ext3-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.41_alpha.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/ext3-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.41_alpha.udeb
(new) ext3-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb standard debian-installer
EXT3 filesystem support
 This package contains the EXT3 filesystem module for the Linux kernel.
ext3-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/ext3-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
fat-modules-2.4.20-amiga-di_0.41_m68k.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fat-modules-2.4.20-amiga-di_0.41_m68k.udeb
fat-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.41_ia64.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fat-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.41_ia64.udeb
fat-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.41_powerpc.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fat-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.41_powerpc.udeb
fat-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fat-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
(new) fat-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb standard debian-installer
FAT filesystem support
 This package contains the FAT and VFAT filesystem modules for the Linux kernel.
fat-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fat-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
fb-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.41_ia64.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fb-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.41_ia64.udeb
fb-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.41_powerpc.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fb-modules-2.4.22-powerpc-small-di_0.41_powerpc.udeb
fb-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fb-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
fb-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.41_alpha.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fb-modules-2.4.24-1-generic-di_0.41_alpha.udeb
(new) fb-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb extra debian-installer
Frame buffer support
 This package contains Frame buffer drivers for the Linux kernel.
fb-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di/fb-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
firewire-core-modules-2.4.22-itanium-di_0.41_ia64.udeb
  to pool/main/l/li

Processing of linux-kernel-di_0.41_source+i386+alpha+ia64+m68k+mips+mipsel+powerpc+sparc.changes

[Archive Administrator]

linux-kernel-di_0.41_source+i386+alpha+ia64+m68k+mips+mipsel+powerpc+sparc.changes 
uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  linux-kernel-di_0.41.dsc
  linux-kernel-di_0.41.tar.gz
  kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  nic-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  nic-extra-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  nic-shared-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  serial-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  ppp-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  isa-pnp-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  socket-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  ide-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  ide-core-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  cdrom-core-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  cdrom-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  firewire-core-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  scsi-core-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  scsi-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  scsi-common-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  scsi-extra-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  plip-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  floppy-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  loop-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  ipv6-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  ext3-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  jfs-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  reiserfs-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  xfs-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  fat-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  md-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  usb-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  usb-storage-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  brltty-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  fb-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  input-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  irda-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  parport-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  nic-pcmcia-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  pcmcia-modules-2.4.25-1-386-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  kernel-image-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  nic-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  nic-extra-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  nic-shared-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  serial-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  ppp-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  isa-pnp-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  socket-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  ide-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  ide-core-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  cdrom-core-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  cdrom-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  firewire-core-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  scsi-core-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  scsi-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  scsi-common-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  scsi-extra-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  plip-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  floppy-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  loop-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  ipv6-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  ext3-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  jfs-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  reiserfs-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  fat-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  md-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  usb-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  usb-storage-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  brltty-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  fb-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  input-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  irda-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  parport-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  nic-pcmcia-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  pcmcia-modules-2.4.22-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  kernel-image-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  nic-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  nic-extra-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  nic-shared-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  serial-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  ppp-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  isa-pnp-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  socket-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  ide-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  ide-core-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  cdrom-core-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  cdrom-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  firewire-core-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  scsi-core-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  scsi-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  scsi-common-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  scsi-extra-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  plip-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  floppy-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  loop-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  ipv6-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  ext3-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  jfs-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  reiserfs-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  fat-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  md-modules-2.4.24-speakup-di_0.41_i386.udeb
  usb-modules-2.4

Re: release status

[Joey Hess]

Joey Hess wrote:
> The last upload of the debian-installer package failed to build on
> powerpc and mips. 
> 
> powerpc:
> 
>   
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=debian-installer&ver=20040227&arch=powerpc&stamp=1078039810&file=log&as=raw
> 
>   The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> di-utils-shell: Depends: libdebian-installer4 (>= 0.19)
> kbd-chooser: Depends: libdebian-installer4 (>= 0.19)
> main-menu: Depends: libdebian-installer4 (>= 0.19)
> udpkg: Depends: libdebian-installer4 (>= 0.16)
>   E: Broken packages
> 
> mips:
> 
>   
> http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=debian-installer&ver=20040227&arch=mips&stamp=1078140231&file=log&as=raw
> 
>   The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> di-utils-shell: Depends: libdebian-installer4 (>= 0.19)
> main-menu: Depends: libdebian-installer4 (>= 0.19)
> udpkg: Depends: libdebian-installer4 (>= 0.16)
>   E: Broken packages
> 
> I'm doing another upload today, and I assume this was some kind of
> autobuilder lag.

Same failures on the most recent autobuild, today. I think this must be
a missing build-dep.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: debian-installer fails for SiS 648, 648fx, 746 mainboard chipsets

[Joey Hess]

Mike Taylor wrote:
> debian-installer fails for my new laptop.  I think I have run in to the
> problem described and patched by Oliver Heilmann on the linux-kernel list.
> Apparently, the AGP port requires some initialization not provided by 
> current kernels.  The machine locks up when the kernel tries to load the 
> agpgart module.
> 
> I have no idea when Oliver's patch will make it into the 2.6 series, but I 
> suppose that will have to happen before it will be backported to a 2.4 
> kernel suitable for Sarge.  In the meantime, I think it would be 
> appropriate to provide a way (through a boot agrument I guess) to inhibit 
> probing for an agp port and loading the modules.  Perhaps this already 
> exists.  If I have overlooked it, could someone please point it out for 
> me?

Yes, boot the installer in expert mode ("expert" at the boot: prompt).
Recent versions will prompt you before loading (most) kernel modules,
and you can make it skip the problimatic one.

> By the way, on my particular (648fx based) hardware, woody installs just 
> fine as long as you use the default 2.2 kernel.
> 
> Lots of people have, or soon will have, this hardware.  I know Gateway and 
> Sager have new notebook models that use these chips.  I think Dell does 
> too.  Sony just announced a line which will use them.
> 
> I would be glad to help if I can once it is decided how this problem 
> should be addressed.

It sounds like it would be good to file a bug report on the debian
kernel as well. Our kernel maintainer may decide to apply this patch
with dispatch. If you file an installation report as documented, our
helpers should see to getting the necessary bug filed against the
kernel.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#235717: Installation report (i386 - Beta 2)

[Frans Pop]

Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

I have been a Debian user since about 5 years.
I currently have a home network consisting of 3 i386 boxes (2 servers, 1 desktop)
and used the desktop for the installation test. Because I got confused the first
few times and was not satisfied with the result, I did the installation 3 times.

Debian-installer-version: Beta 2 (i386 100MB CD image)
uname -a: Linux sauron 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Feb 29 15:30
Method: Boot from Debian Installer CD (in hdc); additional packages from internet 
(http)

Machine: NEC Direction
Processor: Pentium III (Coppermine)
Memory: 256 MB
Root Device: I installed spare IDE disk as hdb and used that for install

Root Size/partition table:  
hda: QUANTUM FIREBALLlct10 20 (unused for this install)
hdb: Maxtor 90430D3
hdc: Hewlett-Packard CD-Writer Plus 8100
hdd: PIONEER DVD-ROM DVD-114

Disk /dev/hdb: 4311 MB, 4311982080 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 524 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes

   Device Boot  Start  End   Blocks   Id  System  Mounted as
/dev/hdb1   1  135  1084356b  W95 FAT32
/dev/hdb2 136  524  3124642+   5  Extended
/dev/hdb5 136  176   3293016  FAT16
/dev/hdb6 177  480  2441848+  83  Linux   /
/dev/hdb7 481  500   160618+  83  Linux   /home
/dev/hdb8 501  524   192748+  82  Linux swap  swap

Output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C693A/694x [Apollo PRO133x] (rev c4)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C598/694x [Apollo MVP3/Pro133x AGP]
00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super South] (rev 22)
00:07.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. 
VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT8233/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 10)
00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10)
00:07.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10)
00:07.4 SMBus: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] (rev 30)
00:0e.0 Network controller: Eicon Technology Corporation Diva 2.01 S/T PCI (rev 01)
00:0f.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102 [Rhine-II] (rev 43)
00:11.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1 (rev 07)
00:11.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Live! MIDI/Game Port (rev 07)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 RF/SG AGP


Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:
Installation in general went fine; important hardware was all
recognized and working after install.

*** Network configuration and DHCP ***
- I think static network configuration should _always_ be an option even if
  DHCP is available (eg. for servers).
- Dynamic DNS is currently not supported when DHCP is used; I had to manually add
  'send hostname "";' to dhclient.conf in order to get the box recognized
  by my DNS-servers.

*** CD/DVD recognition ***
There is somthing funny with how the two CD drives are handled.
- System was booted of hdc. Installation also ran from hdc.
- In post-install when adding apt-sources I had to switch the installation CD from
  hdc to hdd when apt-cdrom scans to add the CD.
- When installing packages I had to switch the installation CD back to hdc.

It looks like discover sometimes switches hdc and hdd between /dev/cdrom0
and /dev/cdrom1. I confirmed this by checking /dev/cd* after installation
and after later reboots.

After installation I had _3_ directories created in / (cdrom, cdrom0, cdrom1),
but there was no default entry for /dev/hdd (to /cdrom1?) in /etc/fstab.

Both my HP CD-RW and Pioneer DVD were installed as ide-cd; the HP CD-RW should
be ide-scsi to support CD-writing. Should the installer handle this?

I changed the CD-RW manually (using /etc/modutils/) and now have:
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root   11 Mar  1 22:47 /dev/cdrom -> /dev/cdrom0
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root8 Mar  1 22:47 /dev/cdrom0 -> /dev/hdd
lrwxrwxrwx1 root root9 Mar  1 22:47 /dev/cdrom1 -> /dev/scd0

Maybe it would be better to have /dev/cdrom0 and /dev/cdrom1 in fstab instead of
/dev/hdc etc. This would also support an ide-scsi drive like above.

*** Usability ***
- I liked installing using the menu better then the 'fully automated' way.
  During the first two installations I got 'lost' several times; it is not
  always obvious how to skip a step (eg. partitioning).
- In the dialog for 'Partition a hard drive' there should be a text 'or choose
  Finish to use existing partitions'.
- The /dev/ide/host0/bus0/target0/lun0 notation is ve

debian-installer fails for SiS 648, 648fx, 746 mainboard chipsets

[Mike Taylor]

debian-installer fails for my new laptop.  I think I have run in to the
problem described and patched by Oliver Heilmann on the linux-kernel list.
Apparently, the AGP port requires some initialization not provided by 
current kernels.  The machine locks up when the kernel tries to load the 
agpgart module.

I have no idea when Oliver's patch will make it into the 2.6 series, but I 
suppose that will have to happen before it will be backported to a 2.4 
kernel suitable for Sarge.  In the meantime, I think it would be 
appropriate to provide a way (through a boot agrument I guess) to inhibit 
probing for an agp port and loading the modules.  Perhaps this already 
exists.  If I have overlooked it, could someone please point it out for 
me?

By the way, on my particular (648fx based) hardware, woody installs just 
fine as long as you use the default 2.2 kernel.

Lots of people have, or soon will have, this hardware.  I know Gateway and 
Sager have new notebook models that use these chips.  I think Dell does 
too.  Sony just announced a line which will use them.

I would be glad to help if I can once it is decided how this problem 
should be addressed.

Thanks

Mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#235579: discover should be able to edit the module configuration

[Gaudenz Steinlin]

On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 01:51:04PM +0100, Gabor Nagy wrote:
> Package: discover
> Version: 1.5-2
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> I have a laptop. My configuration never changes. Discover runs on every
> boot, and I boot many times a day. Each discover run takes like 30s
> time.

Do you have any clue why it takes so long to run discover? On my laptop
running discover only takes less than 1s. I suspect that the delay is caused
by some module, that takes very long to load. In this case your boot will
not be faster if discover is not run.

You can check the time it takes to run discover by using the discover
command on the comman line.

If you really don't want to run discover on every boot, you can also
add all the modules it detects to /etc/modules and uninstall it.

Gaudenz



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Bug#235691: Package: installation-reports

[Erik Holstensson]

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: Mars 1st 2004, 
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/20040301/sarge-i386-businesscard.iso
uname -a: Linux goblin 2.4.24-1-386 #1 Wed Feb 18 19:44:56 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
Date: Mars 1st 2004, 2100-2400 GMT+1
Method: CDRom sarge-i386-businesscard.iso, DHCP, no Proxy.
Machine: Homemade PC-Tower (ASUS A7V133 Motherboard)
Processor: AMD Duron 800
Memory: 512 MB
Root Device: Onboard-IDE
Root Size/partition table:Disk /dev/hda: 20.5 GB, 20547841536 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 2498 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
  Device Boot  Start End  Blocks   Id  System
/dev/hda1   *   1   2   16033+  83  Linux   // Boot (/boot)
/dev/hda2   3  10   64260   82  Linux swap  //Swap
/dev/hda3  112498199848605  Extended//Extended
/dev/hda5  11249819984828+  83  Linux   // Root (/)
Output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8363/8365 [KT133/KM133] (rev 02)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8363/8365 [KT133/KM133 AGP]
00:04.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super South] (rev 22)
00:04.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. 
VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT8233/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 10)
00:04.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10)
00:04.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10)
00:04.4 Bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] (rev 30)
00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ 
(rev 10)
00:11.0 Unknown mass storage controller: Promise Technology, Inc. 20265 (rev 02)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: STMicroelectronics STG4000 [3D Prophet Kyro Series] 
(rev 0f)
Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [E]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [E]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [E]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:

Configure network HW: I Have no Diskdrive in computer so it reported it as "failed to 
install" but I dont know if its a bug or just as it should be.
Load installer modules: Dont remember if it where here or in Install base system: . When on 
something like 10-20% it complained about: "Fel i DBootstrap", dont remember exactly 
what it said, but i just choose Load installer modules again and it worked w/o problems. 
(possible network-problem perhaps)
Partition hard drives: When partitioning harddrives some spellingerrors, running Swedish language. "" is "" and 
"" also when changing type it choose wrong type when entering "linux ext", it choose "linux swap".


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: What's wrong with Denis Barbier's status pages ?

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> AFAICT this is anonymous svn access, OTOH I can reach
>   svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/tasksel/trunk

Yeah, now again only anonymous access fails but with:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/tmp> svn co svn://alioth.debian.org/svn/tasksel/trunk tasksel
svn: No repository found in 'svn://alioth.debian.org/svn/tasksel/trunk'


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Message from the AntiVirus Gateway for Energizer Mail Systems

[ANTIGEN_USHQEXCHBH]

The email message you sent included a file attachment. 
The file story.com  matches one of the file types prohibited 
by Energizer virus protection policy. It was removed from 
the message.
Please contact Energizer for instructions regarding 
alternative methods of file transmission.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Base system installation error

[Barry Hawkins]

On Mar 1, 2004, at 2:45 PM, Johannes Behr wrote:

On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 16:36, Barry Hawkins wrote:
On Mar 1, 2004, at 10:10 AM, Johannes Behr wrote:

On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 15:14, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote:
Hi,


When did you do that?
Just today. I used two different german mirrors (ftp.de.debian.org
and ftp.tiscalie.de)
I did read here there where wrong tarred files
and also that it was fixed.
Please take another try
and let us know what happened.
Just tried it again. Same problem.

regards,
  Johannes
It may be a matter of waiting for your mirrors to update.  See Bug
#233294[0] for some information about this.
[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=233294
As far as I understand I have to get a new installer-image. I just
fetched the sarge-i386-netinst.iso daily-build image (20040229) but
there is no 'net' install anymore.
I can not use the default installation (from CD) since the
hardware detection hangs on my DELL (bug reported befor) if
i try the 'linux' install.
Is there a new/current image with net install?

What's with the sarge-i386-businesscard.iso? Das the businesscard
iso still have a 'net' install?
bye
  Johannes
Johannes,
	Are you getting your ISOs from the recommended location[0]?  I just 
browsed there for i386 and saw sarge-i386-netinst.iso images.

[0] http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/

Regards,
--
Barry C. Hawkins
All Things Computed
site: www.allthingscomputed.com
weblog: www.yepthatsme.com


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Base system installation error

[Johannes Behr]

On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 16:36, Barry Hawkins wrote:
> On Mar 1, 2004, at 10:10 AM, Johannes Behr wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 15:14, Geert Stappers wrote:
> >> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >
> >> When did you do that?
> >
> > Just today. I used two different german mirrors (ftp.de.debian.org
> > and ftp.tiscalie.de)
> >
> >>
> >> I did read here there where wrong tarred files
> >> and also that it was fixed.
> >>
> >> Please take another try
> >> and let us know what happened.
> >
> > Just tried it again. Same problem.
> >
> > regards,
> >   Johannes
> >
> It may be a matter of waiting for your mirrors to update.  See Bug 
> #233294[0] for some information about this.
> 
> [0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=233294

As far as I understand I have to get a new installer-image. I just
fetched the sarge-i386-netinst.iso daily-build image (20040229) but
there is no 'net' install anymore.

I can not use the default installation (from CD) since the
hardware detection hangs on my DELL (bug reported befor) if
i try the 'linux' install.

Is there a new/current image with net install?

What's with the sarge-i386-businesscard.iso? Das the businesscard
iso still have a 'net' install?

bye
  Johannes


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Partitioning schemes for partman-auto

[Falk Hueffner]

Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Falk Hueffner wrote:
> > This is the only partitioning scheme which in my opinion fits for
> > users who might go with whatever the default is:
> > 
> > /   Whole harddisk
> > swapnone, but 512M swap file (independent of memory)
> 
> I also wouldn't mind having this scheme available, although I think
> the current "simple" scheme (/, /home, /swap) is also useful.

Fine as long as there is some help text which makes the choice
trivially obvious. That seems hard.

> > Swap nowadays only serve to spill pages that haven't been accessed
> > for hours, or to slow down the system enough so you can kill
> > processes gone haywire; therefore, it is not performance critical
> > and a swap file will do just fine and is more flexible WRT
> > resizing.
>
> Not true for many of our target architectures and systems.

Those are used by people who do this stuff manually anyway.

-- 
Falk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Partitioning schemes for partman-auto

[Joey Hess]

Falk Hueffner wrote:
> This is the only partitioning scheme which in my opinion fits for
> users who might go with whatever the default is:
> 
> /   Whole harddisk
> swapnone, but 512M swap file (independent of memory)

I also wouldn't mind having this scheme available, although I think the
current "simple" scheme (/, /home, /swap) is also useful.

> Swap nowadays only serve to spill pages that haven't been accessed for
> hours, or to slow down the system enough so you can kill processes
> gone haywire; therefore, it is not performance critical and a swap
> file will do just fine and is more flexible WRT resizing.

Not true for many of our target architectures and systems.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: release status

[Stephen R Marenka]

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:52:26PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 08:39:23PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:

> > I now have m68k daily builds at
> > . They are now
> > being built right off the archive (doesn't require anything out of cvs
> > to work).
> > 
> > >  - Get ISOs working and building daily, if applicable.
> > 
> > Can I get m68k added to the build on gluck?
> 
> Sure, just set up a cron job to push your daily build over to gluck with

Already done (url above).

> the daily-build script. Then coordinaty with [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get
> debian-cd supporting m68k and building using the necessary images from
> your build. I belive that manty wants to only build using files on gluck.

Thanks.

> If you prefer, once you have the daily builds pushed to gluck, let me
> know the url and I will update the ports status page to use it.

Please, it's much faster.


> > On that subject, from a d-i perspective, the only difference between the
> > subarchs is the kernel (on an initrd, that's modules). Only one subarch 
> > is cdrom-bootable, any reason I shouldn't try to combine all the
> > subarchs onto one CD?
> 
> Don't see why not.

I should probably do this before I annoy manty about the cd.

Thanks,

Stephen

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Partitioning schemes for partman-auto

[Falk Hueffner]

Anton Zinoviev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> The partitioning schemes of partman-auto currently are only
> examples.  So if you have some idea for usefull partitioning just
> tell it.  I have to know what partitions your scheme has and an
> example size of each partition as well as the minimal and the
> maximal usefull size.  For example:

This is the only partitioning scheme which in my opinion fits for
users who might go with whatever the default is:

/   Whole harddisk
swapnone, but 512M swap file (independent of memory)

Rationale: I don't see any noticeable benefit for Jane User in having
lots of small partitions; and as has been pointed out it always either
wastes space or is prone to overruns.

Swap nowadays only serve to spill pages that haven't been accessed for
hours, or to slow down the system enough so you can kill processes
gone haywire; therefore, it is not performance critical and a swap
file will do just fine and is more flexible WRT resizing.

-- 
Falk


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

debian-installer_20040301_i386.changes ACCEPTED

[Debian Installer]

Accepted:
debian-installer-demo_20040301_i386.deb
  to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer-demo_20040301_i386.deb
debian-installer_20040301.dsc
  to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20040301.dsc
debian-installer_20040301.tar.gz
  to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20040301.tar.gz
Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: release status

[Joey Hess]

Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 08:39:23PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:
> 
> > A few things that porters need to do soon, if you have a port that
> > mostly works. Consider these mandatory for release:
> > 
> >  - Get daily builds working.
> > Currently working: alpha, i386, ia64, m68k, sparc
> 
> I now have m68k daily builds at
> . They are now
> being built right off the archive (doesn't require anything out of cvs
> to work).
> 
> >  - Get ISOs working and building daily, if applicable.
> 
> Can I get m68k added to the build on gluck?

Sure, just set up a cron job to push your daily build over to gluck with
the daily-build script. Then coordinaty with [EMAIL PROTECTED] to get
debian-cd supporting m68k and building using the necessary images from
your build. I belive that manty wants to only build using files on gluck.

If you prefer, once you have the daily builds pushed to gluck, let me
know the url and I will update the ports status page to use it.

> On that subject, from a d-i perspective, the only difference between the
> subarchs is the kernel (on an initrd, that's modules). Only one subarch 
> is cdrom-bootable, any reason I shouldn't try to combine all the
> subarchs onto one CD?

Don't see why not.

> >  - Get at least one successful, or nearly successful installation
> >report.
> 
> One fully successful (mac - 234770).
> 
> >  - Make sure the debian-installer package builds for your arch in a
> >clean chroot, and let me know so I can add your architecture to the
> >control file. Currently only i386, powerpc, mips, and ia64 are listed.
> 
> m68k works, please add it.

Excellent! I have added it and uploaded so we can see how it goes on the
autobuilder.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: [l10n] Update l10n-changes

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Nikolai Prokoschenko ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> * The biggest change for now: if log-changes is run after (or within)
> every debconf-updatepo run, the final changelog will include all the
> translators who have been working on it since the last release! Here
> you go, Christian.

Sounds fine. Will do some tests. You can already check it against the
package which have the Romanian translations I added this morning
(find debian-installer -name ro.po).

While doing these changes, I added the script output to
arcboot-installer for which the changelog was still "old-style".



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: What's wrong with Denis Barbier's status pages ?

[Denis Barbier]

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 01:37:57PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> 
> > No, svn+ssh does work but not anonymous.
> 
> svn+ssh does not work either:
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/debian/d-i/HEAD$ svn co 
> svn://alioth.debian.org/tasksel/trunk tasksel
> svn: No repository found in 'svn://alioth.debian.org/tasksel/trunk'
> svn: Berkeley DB error while opening environment for filesystem /svn/tasksel/db:
> Permission denied

AFAICT this is anonymous svn access, OTOH I can reach
  svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/tasksel/trunk

Denis


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Partitioning schemes for partman-auto

[Thiemo Seufer]

Anton Zinoviev wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> The partitioning schemes of partman-auto currently are only examples.
> So if you have some idea for usefull partitioning just tell it.  I
> have to know what partitions your scheme has and an example size of
> each partition as well as the minimal and the maximal usefull size.
> For example:
> 
>Minimal Typical Maximal
> /  50Mb300Mb   300Mb
> /usr   1Gb 3Gb 5Gb
> /var   100Mb   500Mb   1000Mb

A print job for, say, a high-resolution ink printer can easily flood
/var in this scheme.


Thiemo


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Processing of debian-installer_20040301_i386.changes

[Archive Administrator]

debian-installer_20040301_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  debian-installer_20040301.dsc
  debian-installer_20040301.tar.gz
  debian-installer-demo_20040301_i386.deb
  debian-installer-images_20040301_i386.tar.gz

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: release status

[Joey Hess]

The last upload of the debian-installer package failed to build on
powerpc and mips. 

powerpc:

  
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=debian-installer&ver=20040227&arch=powerpc&stamp=1078039810&file=log&as=raw

  The following packages have unmet dependencies:
di-utils-shell: Depends: libdebian-installer4 (>= 0.19)
kbd-chooser: Depends: libdebian-installer4 (>= 0.19)
main-menu: Depends: libdebian-installer4 (>= 0.19)
udpkg: Depends: libdebian-installer4 (>= 0.16)
  E: Broken packages

mips:

  
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?&pkg=debian-installer&ver=20040227&arch=mips&stamp=1078140231&file=log&as=raw

  The following packages have unmet dependencies:
di-utils-shell: Depends: libdebian-installer4 (>= 0.19)
main-menu: Depends: libdebian-installer4 (>= 0.19)
udpkg: Depends: libdebian-installer4 (>= 0.16)
  E: Broken packages

I'm doing another upload today, and I assume this was some kind of
autobuilder lag.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

[Virus detected]

[MailMonitor on PVLDCX04]

Sophos Plc MailMonitor for Domino/D R1.0(4.003c)
Server: PVLDCX04
---

Your email contained infected attachment(s).  For advice consult your
system administrator.

---
Mail-Info

From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rec.: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:   03/01/2004 10:33:05 AM
Subject:Re: Your letter

---
File: [your_letter.p]   State: [file contains virus]





-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mkisofs for build_netboot

[Joey Hess]

Geert Stappers wrote:
> mkisofs -r -J -b isolinux.bin -c boot.cat \
> -no-emul-boot -boot-load-size 4 -boot-info-table \
> -o ./tmp/netboot/mini.iso ./tmp/netboot/cd_tree
> make[2]: mkisofs: Command not found
> 
> 
> Installing mkisofs fixed it.
> 
> For what does the netboot need the mini.iso ?

It's a slight misnomer to call it "netboot", but the mini iso is
identical to netboot in all particulars except for how it is booted, so
it was easiest to generate it as part of the netboot image build.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Receive yo.ur Vlagra orde.r in 24 to 48 h.ours RaXZ

[Clyde excretion]

Now You Can Or`der Val^ium - X|anax - Vi"agra - Ci)alis Onl{ine.
8O+% Savi(ngs Orde~ring On!lineNo Prescr`iption RequiredDoc'tor&FDA Appr~ovedFedEx Over`night Shi^pping
Visit Our Site and Order Here

(Spec!ial Grand Openi,ng Pri(ces End Soonord{er your med[s today and have them at your doorstep tomorrow)









iwantoffthisride




brownian drew aberdeen eisner plowshare herculean demented fischbein continuo chemise dane shatter fete workforce accidental atkinson almanac averred benson brusque erotica acumen grenade newell inexpressible endothelial eyelid eager cuddle destitute capricorn agee eventful courage embraceable stretch curious dec contradistinction apartheid accustom ethyl wylie destine arterial staley crud effusive vend alexandra delectable ireland coyote lifeboat baptist cathy experimentation tx kirov acyclic cromwell mammalian stray kirk grebe dairy dank goldwater deadlock printout fullerton workbook focus frontiersman abdominal rose fizzle show syllogism owens objectify impressive eastern neglecter reside robbins efficacious 
inflammatory module nitrate chapter bouquet paraphrase hitler peacock do bud amongst jasper penalty dramatist dispersive melpomene chinchilla cortex latvia francis quirinal bothersome quell claret demigod potpourri sisyphus fief arsenic akers swordfish picture trot liverpudlian cougar gem draftsperson bluebird dogtrot chastity allstate utile congressman mary beauty certain primordial tenderloin guignol emittance squirm multinomial criterion custodian benediction drought sewerage earthmen ailanthus pickup leeuwenhoek bimolecular rapt donovan millennia censor jerk alienate gaillardia liquor far doghouse pathfind athletic scotland epitaph probabilist mcgowan crimson muddle clamber preemptive archaism furthest brewery gondola hiroshi cash j phonic gamma roberta woodgrain somersault perfunctory polonium fleck momentum nobody'd constructible exultation retard mabel demultiplex autoclave shudder sidesaddle query teledyne travel detractor gaucherie he'll guidance 
discipline intermediary macdougall mink sanhedrin clap efficacy approbation arccosine wadi brumidi cayley cochrane muslin ounce obtrude joey principal santa simons aeneas gunther coventry dominion dorothy completion ardency baseband hanford sony sweaty stretch pyrimidine upstair aerodynamic arlen decimal tarpaper heron petrology eclogue abstracter bladdernut yesterday vaughn contraceptive lunatic chopin judd breeches emphysematous seafare artifact duplicate immune paulus sapiens boxy macgregor eh passe weatherbeaten yaounde elba badinage tar dull allegory valedictory eclogue arlington daybed blip populist docile decorate 
haag packet vent panicle feast quadrennial chess bam seedbed chapter whop summit hydrothermal surreptitious marina philanthrope chandler attribution dewy stultify nepal sire withdrawn aspersion tentacle inapplicable englishmen perkins broadcast evelyn dowry dragoon capricious flashy cantabrigian bellatrix palace propyl abutted ben page pious ajar denmark harlan spiny ampex calibrate ax edit proprietor agamemnon seton hate hilum polymer stump confidential sneak ammeter extolled acknowledge cavern byzantine luminescent ostracism certificate chuckwalla frankfurt servicemen balzac assassinate algerian claim brocade andesite attica software transmittable cottrell 
cousin pond watchmen conjunct ingestible anger draw teresa ringlet tranquil renault skeet allergic failure osgood skeleton ellis sweat execution teledyne crewman bunk hopple darius rotary oldsmobile pensive insect worksheet infrared assignee andromeda develop automaton infight constipate acceptor iris deflate bucketfull raillery bedpost indochina yaqui whig pneumatic thanksgiving galvanic kimball intuitive pickle clemson mudguard nsf corruption alfresco cub lowry stalin conscious docket josephus apprehension lausanne bourgeoisie celeste alb cannot cleavage predicament tansy succinct youngish lukemia sandblast editorial penthouse melville insurmountable hendrickson wrap wheeze mythic prim hollister beware mafia afraid wife turbine ethic bipartisan troop insecure drudgery divine culminate 
custodian libation quorum sniff schism speakeasy yawl aim indefinite instill hoof dogmatic appalachia confirmation glutamate walkie sabbatical astride prorate briny spontaneous died eastward platitude bricklaying vermeil baptiste atrophy denominate nobody carton byte diorite gaur peregrine sour chaplin delegate ammerman churchwoman bedpost dilettante sa suzuki mandrake contravariant bop overhang mannequin collapsible sequestration include moan rhododendron egress claim jilt thief bounty fairway crosspoint exquisite misnomer lexicon greer expedient disyllable scapegoat forbearance janos laotian doodle nagoya barton basswood emily bombard situs maestro archibald micrography erlenmeyer aberrant bernardo anthony cocksure joystick sure cocksure debugged dey accreditate librarian diplomacy poise buzzword niobe 




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Base system installation error

[Geert Stappers]

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:10:21PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 15:14, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> 
> > When did you do that?
> 
> Just today. I used two different german mirrors (ftp.de.debian.org
> and ftp.tiscalie.de)
> 
> > 
> > I did read here there where wrong tarred files
> > and also that it was fixed.
> > 
> > Please take another try
> > and let us know what happened.
> 
> Just tried it again. Same problem.

And that was with testing?
Or with unstable?


Cheers Geert Stappers


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Base system installation error

[Johannes Behr]

On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 16:37, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 04:10:21PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 15:14, Geert Stappers wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > > 
> > 
> > > When did you do that?
> > 
> > Just today. I used two different german mirrors (ftp.de.debian.org
> > and ftp.tiscalie.de)
> > 
> > > 
> > > I did read here there where wrong tarred files
> > > and also that it was fixed.
> > > 
> > > Please take another try
> > > and let us know what happened.
> > 
> > Just tried it again. Same problem.
> 
> And that was with testing?
> Or with unstable?

with testing

regards,
  Johannes

> 
> 
> Cheers Geert Stappers
-- 
Johannes Behr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Computer Graphics Center


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Base system installation error

[Barry Hawkins]

On Mar 1, 2004, at 10:10 AM, Johannes Behr wrote:

On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 15:14, Geert Stappers wrote:
On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote:
Hi,


When did you do that?
Just today. I used two different german mirrors (ftp.de.debian.org
and ftp.tiscalie.de)
I did read here there where wrong tarred files
and also that it was fixed.
Please take another try
and let us know what happened.
Just tried it again. Same problem.

regards,
  Johannes
It may be a matter of waiting for your mirrors to update.  See Bug 
#233294[0] for some information about this.

[0] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=233294

Regards,
--
Barry C. Hawkins
All Things Computed
site: www.allthingscomputed.com
weblog: www.yepthatsme.com


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Base system installation error

[Johannes Behr]

On Mon, 2004-03-01 at 15:14, Geert Stappers wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote:
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 

> When did you do that?

Just today. I used two different german mirrors (ftp.de.debian.org
and ftp.tiscalie.de)

> 
> I did read here there where wrong tarred files
> and also that it was fixed.
> 
> Please take another try
> and let us know what happened.

Just tried it again. Same problem.

regards,
  Johannes



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#230435: AIC79xx not working. Solved!

[Steve Haavik]

Doh! I forgot to disable Hostraid on the controller. Don't need raid.
We only have one drive. Now it works.




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#235617: installation-reports

[Torben Höft]

Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/i386/current/sarge-i386-netins
t.iso
uname -a: Linux debby 2.4.24-1-386 # 1 Wed Feb 18 19:44:56 EST 2004 i686
unknown
Date: 01.03.2004 12:00
Method: Network install, direct connect

Machine: Fujitsu Siemens Primergy P200
Processor: 2x PIII 1GHz
Memory: 1GB
Root Device: Raid Mylex 
Root Size/partition table: 

/boot
2GB /swap
9GB /   ext3
20GB/home   ext3

Output of lspci:

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[E]
Install boot loader:[ ]
Reboot: [ ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

Reading Package Lists...
Building Dependency Tree...
Suggested packages:
  lilo kernel-doc-2.4.24 kernel-pcmcia-modules-2.4.24-1-386
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  kernel-image-2.4.24-1-386
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/10.6MB of archives.
After unpacking 28.6MB of additional disk space will be used.
Selecting previously deselected package kernel-image-2.4.24-1-386.
(Reading database ... 7172 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking kernel-image-2.4.24-1-386 (from
.../kernel-image-2.4.24-1-386_2.4.24-3_i386.deb) ...
Setting up kernel-image-2.4.24-1-386 (2.4.24-3) ...

 You are attempting to install a kernel version that is the same as
 the version you are currently running (version 2.4.24-1-386). The modules
 list is quite likely to have been changed, and the modules dependency
 file /lib/modules/2.4.24-1-386/modules.dep needs to be re-built. It can
 not be built correctly right now, since the module list for the
 running kernel are likely to be different from the kernel installed.
 I am creating a new modules.dep file, but that may not be
 correct. It shall be regenerated correctly at next reboot.

 I repeat: you have to reboot in order for the modules file to be
 created correctly. Until you reboot, it may be impossible to load
 some modules. Reboot as soon as this install is finished (Do not
 reboot right now, since you may not be able to boot back up until
 installation is over, but boot immediately after). I can not stress
 that too much. You need to reboot soon.

Please Hit return to continue.  /usr/sbin/mkinitrd: constituent device
/dev/rd/disc0/part2 does not exist
Failed to create initrd image.
dpkg: error processing kernel-image-2.4.24-1-386 (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
 kernel-image-2.4.24-1-386
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: release status

[Stephen R Marenka]

On Mon, Feb 23, 2004 at 08:39:23PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote:

> A few things that porters need to do soon, if you have a port that
> mostly works. Consider these mandatory for release:
> 
>  - Get daily builds working.
>   Currently working: alpha, i386, ia64, m68k, sparc

I now have m68k daily builds at
. They are now
being built right off the archive (doesn't require anything out of cvs
to work).

>  - Get ISOs working and building daily, if applicable.

Can I get m68k added to the build on gluck?

On that subject, from a d-i perspective, the only difference between the
subarchs is the kernel (on an initrd, that's modules). Only one subarch 
is cdrom-bootable, any reason I shouldn't try to combine all the
subarchs onto one CD?

>  - Get at least one successful, or nearly successful installation
>report.

One fully successful (mac - 234770).

>  - Make sure the debian-installer package builds for your arch in a
>clean chroot, and let me know so I can add your architecture to the
>control file. Currently only i386, powerpc, mips, and ia64 are listed.

m68k works, please add it.

Thanks,

Stephen

-- 
Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Re: Base system installation error

[Geert Stappers]

On Mon, Mar 01, 2004 at 02:38:44PM +0100, Johannes Behr wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> i tried to install sarge/testing on my dell INSPIRON-8000
> notebook using 'net' install.
> 
> After assigning the partitions/mirror the install-process 
> starts to fetch packages and every think just looks fine
> until it stops and a red text-error-box appears:
> 
> -
> Install the base System
> 
> Base system installation error
> 
> The debootstrap program exited with an error (return values 1)
> 
> You might find more information in /target/var/log/debootstrap.log
> -
> 
> I look at the /target/var/log files:
> 
> There are two files:
> 
> debootstrap.err.log: empty, zero size
> debootstrap.log: 1 line:
> 
>   tar: Unrecognized file type.
> 
> I did not find any fitting bug report so I hope to get
> some feedback on this list.
> 

When did you do that?

I did read here there where wrong tarred files
and also that it was fixed.

Please take another try
and let us know what happened.


Cheers
Geert Stappers


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

[l10n] Update l10n-changes

[Nikolai Prokoschenko]

Hello, it's me again!

Well, you guessed it: I've updated my script (or now better: scripts)
once again. The new features of this release:

* The script has been renamed to something more appropriate
* It has been split in two parts, one suitable for running after each
debconf-updatepo run (Denis, I'd like to know, if this part of the
script could be included in po-debconf!) and one for generating the
changelog entry
* iso_639.tab is now used, if available. If not, the built-in list is
used.
* The biggest change for now: if log-changes is run after (or within)
every debconf-updatepo run, the final changelog will include all the
translators who have been working on it since the last release! Here
you go, Christian.

Well, that's about it. Please try this stuff, tell me what you think
about it.

-- 
Nikolai Prokoschenko 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: available for french translation

[Petter Reinholdtsen]

[Noel Nachtegael]
> hi,
> 
> my name is Noël I am from Belgium
> I am available for french translations for the installer

Sounds good.  See http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/>
and
http://cvs.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/debian-installer/doc/translations.txt?rev=1.22&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup&cvsroot=d-i>
for info on how to contribute.

See http://people.debian.org/~barbier/debian-installer/l10n/> for
the current status.  French seem to be doing quite well, but I am sure
there is more translation work left to be done in Debian. :)


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Base system installation error

[Johannes Behr]

Hi,

i tried to install sarge/testing on my dell INSPIRON-8000
notebook using 'net' install.

After assigning the partitions/mirror the install-process 
starts to fetch packages and every think just looks fine
until it stops and a red text-error-box appears:

-
Install the base System

Base system installation error

The debootstrap program exited with an error (return values 1)

You might find more information in /target/var/log/debootstrap.log
-

I look at the /target/var/log files:

There are two files:

debootstrap.err.log: empty, zero size
debootstrap.log: 1 line:

  tar: Unrecognized file type.

I did not find any fitting bug report so I hope to get
some feedback on this list.

regards,
  Johannes

-- 
Johannes Behr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Computer Graphics Center


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#235221: marked as done (debootstrap error (return value 1), tar: Unrecognised file type)

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Your message dated Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:49:03 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Processed: busybox is not used in d-i
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Feb 2004 23:03:49 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 27 15:03:49 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.186] 
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Awr1J-0007kC-00; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 15:03:49 -0800
Received: from [212.227.126.160] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de)
by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1Awr1H-0008LP-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 00:03:47 +0100
Received: from [80.171.20.195] (helo=homunkulus)
by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 1Awr1H-0001eB-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sat, 28 Feb 2004 00:03:47 +0100
From: Daniel Vogelheim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: debootstrap error (return value 1), tar: Unrecognised file type
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 2004 00:08:04 +0100
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 2.0/32.640 trialware
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de [EMAIL PROTECTED] auth:d2e3082859be6a731d09f38823bb7cee
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: debootstrap
Version: 'Sarge' testing; download from Feb 26 2004.
flavor: testing
architecture:  i386
model: IBM Thinkpad X31

Hello, I'm trying to install Debian in its 'testing flavor' (Sarge) on
my laptop using a network install and booting over PXE. A question on
the debian-testing mailing list didn't yield an answer, so I assume
this is an unreported bug. Apologies in advance if this should turn
out to be a 'user error'.

When booting through PXE, the installer comes up fine and guides me
through partitioning. It then proceeds to install the base system, and
downloads a number of packages. At the end, it tells me that an error
had occurred:
   Base system installation error
   The debootstrap program exited with an error (return value 1).
   You might find more information in /target/var/log/debootstrap.log.

Said file contains only the line:
  tar: Unrecognised file type


I use boot images netboot-initrd.img and vmlinuz from:
ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/testing/main/installer-i386/current/ima=
ges/

The pxelinux configuration is:
kernel vmlinuz
append load initrd=3Dnetboot-initrd.gz devfs=3Dmount console=3Dtty0
ramdisk_size=3D8192 root=3D/dev/ram0
ipappend 1

I've mainly used the German Debian mirror (de.debian.org ?), but also
tried the second German mirror in the list (de2...) and the Debian
main site, all with the same result.


I'll gladly any further questions you might have on this issue.
Thanks.


---
Received: (at 235221-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Mar 2004 12:49:09 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 01 04:49:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (extern.mail.waldi.eu.org) [82.139.196.55] 
(postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Axmr6-Xq-00; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 04:49:09 -0800
Received: by wavehammer.waldi.eu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 45DDA3C5F5; Mon,  1 Mar 2004 13:49:03 +0100 (CET)
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 13:49:03 +0100
From: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Processed: busybox is not used in d-i
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27 
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no 
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_27
X-Spam-Level: 


--rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ
Content-Ty

Processed: Re: Processed: busybox is not used in d-i

[Debian Bug Tracking System]

Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> reassign 235221 busybox-cvs
Bug#235221: debootstrap error (return value 1), tar: Unrecognised file type
Bug reassigned from package `debootstrap' to `busybox-cvs'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: What's wrong with Denis Barbier's status pages ?

[Christian Perrier]

Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> No, svn+ssh does work but not anonymous.

svn+ssh does not work either:

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/debian/d-i/HEAD$ svn co svn://alioth.debian.org/tasksel/trunk 
tasksel
svn: No repository found in 'svn://alioth.debian.org/tasksel/trunk'
svn: Berkeley DB error while opening environment for filesystem /svn/tasksel/db:
Permission denied


looks like yesterday's problem combined with a missing trunk
directory.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/svn/tasksel$ ls -la
total 32
drwxrwsr-x6 www-data tasksel  4096 Jan 22 02:31 .
drwxrwsr-x   51 wichert  www-data 4096 Feb 21 12:26 ..
-rw-rw-r--1 www-data tasksel   376 Jan 22 02:31 README.txt
drwxrwsr-x2 www-data tasksel  4096 Jan 22 02:31 dav
drwxrwsr-x2 www-data tasksel  4096 Feb 29 18:14 db
-rw-rw-r--1 www-data tasksel 2 Jan 22 02:31 format
drwxrwsr-x2 www-data tasksel  4096 Feb 27 17:39 hooks
drwxrwsr-x2 www-data tasksel  4096 Jan 22 02:31 locks


(notice that alioth is still quantz)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#235107: In fact you can

[Nikita V. Youshchenko]

> And even more, once discover2 will replace discover1, it will
> work flawless with 2.4 and 2.6 kernel, and you can't do that with
> /etc/modules

If fact you can, by using aliases instead of modules names in /etc/modules. 
These aliases may be defined differently in /etc/modutils/ for 2.4 
and /etc/modprobe.d/ for 2.6

However, it is somewhat strange way :).




-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

building a debian install CD with a custom kernel

[Matthias Rabe]

Hello,
is there any howto on building an install CD with a custom kernel to
support special hardware not supported by standard debian kernels?

Ciao,
m.
-- 
Matthias Rabe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#235579: discover should be able to edit the module configuration

[Gabor Nagy]

Package: discover
Version: 1.5-2
Severity: wishlist

I have a laptop. My configuration never changes. Discover runs on every
boot, and I boot many times a day. Each discover run takes like 30s
time.

It was very good to have discover when I installed the system. But now
it is annoying me.

I would like to have some option like runonce, so that it detects all my
hw it can find on installation, or on a new release of discover, then it
just edits my module configuration (ex. /etc/modutils/discover for 2.4,
/etc/modprobe.d/discover for 2.6), adding some aliases, like
alias eth0 e100
alias sound-slot-0 maestro or whatever.

So that next time I don't have to run discover to load a bunch of unused
modules, taking my memory, and taking a lot of time to detect the same
hardware configuration again, but when I want to use something the
corresponding module gets loaded automatically.

If there are some modules that can't get loaded automatically (I am
really sorry such things exist) those can be added to /etc/modules so
that they are loaded at boot always.

Regards,
Gabor

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages discover depends on:
ii  dash0.4.21   The Debian Almquist Shell
ii  debconf 1.3.22   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdiscover11.5-2hardware identification library

-- debconf information excluded



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Bug#235578: discover: fails to load several modules on 2.6, because of different names

[Gabor Nagy]

Package: discover
Version: 1.5-2
Severity: important

Discover detects my hardware, and tries to load modules. It seems to me
it is using 2.4 module names, thus it fails.

Some typescripts:
Detecting hardware: agpgart i810_rng i810-tco i82092 i82092 e100
ide-scsi i810_audio usb-ohci usb-ohci
Skipping Module agpgart. It's already loaded.
FATAL: Module i810_rng not found.
Skipping i810_rng module; assuming it is compiled into the kernel.
FATAL: Module i810_tco not found.
Skipping i810-tco module; assuming it is compiled into the kernel.
FATAL: Module i82092 not found.
Skipping i82092 module; assuming it is compiled into the kernel.
FATAL: Module i82092 not found.
Skipping i82092 module; assuming it is compiled into the kernel.
Loading e100 module.
Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver - version 2.3.36-k1
Copyright (c) 2003 Intel Corporation

e100: eth0: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Connection
  Hardware receive checksums enabled

FATAL: Module ide_scsi not found.
Skipping ide-scsi module; assuming it is compiled into the kernel.
FATAL: Module i810_audio not found.
Skipping i810_audio module; assuming it is compiled into the kernel.
FATAL: Module usb_ohci not found.
Skipping usb-ohci module; assuming it is compiled into the kernel.
FATAL: Module usb_ohci not found.
Skipping usb-ohci module; assuming it is compiled into the kernel.

And by hand:
swordfish:/usr/share/doc/discover# modprobe intel-agp
agpgart: Detected an Intel i845 Chipset.
agpgart: Maximum main memory to use for agp memory: 203M
agpgart: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0x6000

i810_audio:

swordfish:/usr/share/doc/discover# modprobe snd-intel8x0
intel8x0_measure_ac97_clock: measured 49312 usecs
intel8x0: clocking to 48000

usb-ohci:

swordfish:/usr/share/doc/discover# modprobe ohci-hcd
ohci_hcd :02:0e.0: OHCI Host Controller
ohci_hcd :02:0e.0: irq 10, pci mem d1bfa000
ohci_hcd :02:0e.0: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
hub 1-0:1.0: USB hub found
hub 1-0:1.0: 3 ports detected
ohci_hcd :02:0e.1: OHCI Host Controller
ohci_hcd :02:0e.1: irq 10, pci mem d1c05000
ohci_hcd :02:0e.1: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 2
usb 1-2: new low speed USB device using address 2
drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c: ctrl urb status -32 received
drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c: ctrl urb status -32 received
input: USB HID v1.10 Mouse [PS/2+USB Mouse] on usb-:02:0e.0-2
hub 2-0:1.0: USB hub found
hub 2-0:1.0: 2 ports detected
swordfish:/usr/share/doc/discover# modprobe ehci-hcd
ehci_hcd :02:0e.2: EHCI Host Controller
ehci_hcd :02:0e.2: irq 10, pci mem d1c0d000
ehci_hcd :02:0e.2: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 3
ehci_hcd :02:0e.2: USB 2.0 enabled, EHCI 0.95, driver 2003-Dec-29
hub 3-0:1.0: USB hub found
hub 3-0:1.0: 5 ports detected
swordfish:/usr/share/doc/discover# usb 1-2: USB disconnect, address 2
usb 1-2: new low speed USB device using address 3
drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c: ctrl urb status -32 received
drivers/usb/input/hid-core.c: ctrl urb status -32 received
input: USB HID v1.10 Mouse [PS/2+USB Mouse] on usb-:02:0e.0-2

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (99, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.3
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C

Versions of packages discover depends on:
ii  dash0.4.21   The Debian Almquist Shell
ii  debconf 1.3.22   Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6   2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii  libdiscover11.5-2hardware identification library

-- debconf information:
* discover/manage_cdrom_devices: false
  discover/cdrom_base_mountpoint: /
  discover/cdrom_base_mountpoint_error: 



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: mkisofs for build_netboot

[Joshua Kwan]

On Mon, 01 Mar 2004 08:07:14 +0100, Geert Stappers wrote:
> For what does the netboot need the mini.iso ?

On i386, build_netboot will spit out an initrd.gz, vmlinuz, and a related
ISO image. On sparc it will always generate a.out tftp boot images. Such
is how the cookie crumbles :)

-- 
Joshua Kwan



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: partman review

[Anton Zinoviev]

On 29.II.2004 at 17:09 Joey Hess wrote:
> 
> Looking at the automatic partitoning menu, I get the feeling this menu
> was designed to be used this way.. was it?

Yes, it was.

> As to implementation, I think partman-auto could simply povide an init.d
> script which runs last and displays the menu iff debconf priority is high.

This is a very nice idea.  I intended to play with the files default
and priority in the menu directories.

http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2003/debian-boot-200312/msg00670.html

Anton Zinoviev


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]