Processed: severity of 242246 is important
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > severity 242246 important Bug#242246: debian install report Severity set to `important'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 242321 to xserver-xfree86
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 242321 xserver-xfree86 Bug#242321: debian-installer: Keyboard layout (de_CH) not used for generating XF86Config Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `xserver-xfree86'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 239552 to libdebian-installer
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 239552 libdebian-installer Bug#239552: kernel-image-2.4.25-1-386: incompatibility with the cciss module ? Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `libdebian-installer'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Location list proposal [was: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?]
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 06:00:28PM -0700, Anthony Johnson wrote: > ICU's name list _is_ following ISO 3166, and so do > many other sources. What does that mean? These lists are different, and ICU has a much less controversial wording. Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 242246
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 242246 fixed Bug#242246: debian install report There were no tags set. Tags added: fixed > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 242246 to libdebian-installer
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 242246 libdebian-installer Bug#242246: debian install report Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `libdebian-installer'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: retitle 242232 to undefined problem installing l lilo
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > retitle 242232 undefined problem installing l lilo Bug#242232: Package: installation-reports Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging 242232
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > tags 242232 moreinfo Bug#242232: Package: installation-reports There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 242232 to lilo-installer
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 > reassign 242232 lilo-installer Bug#242232: Package: installation-reports Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `lilo-installer'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#242232: Package: installation-reports
paf wrote: > Comments/Problems: > Impossible tu use lilo!! I just manage to install grub. > So i reboot, it' ok, debian is installed. > I removed grub and install lilo, and i never reach to mounr root fs, i think it's > because i make it ext3?? > I reinstall and stay with grub. > > It' s the third time i can't install lilo witch the beta 3 installer!!! > > Thanks a lot for your great job!. If you would tell us what the actual problem was with installing lilo, and perhaps include a copy of /var/log/debian-installer/syslog and /var/log/debian-installer/messages from the installed system, then we might be able to fix it. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?
Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm just a naïve gaijin[1], but I'm not sure you're right about that. > Written zh_CN and zh_TW look very similar to Western eyes. I've seen a > comparison of the two in some Sun documentation, and they really just > looked like the exact same glyphs in two different fonts. Like look at > English lettering in bold versus normal weight. (Not *exactly* like > that, but close). I'm not sure what this has to do with the original question, but the simplified chinese characters used in the PRC can look _very_ different from the traditional forms used in Taiwan (anyway, it's not accurate to say the difference is `close to bold-versus-normal'). [One easy way to see an example if you use emacs is to view the `hello' buffer (C-h h), and look at the section `Difference among chinese characters' (you need a lot of fonts installed to see them all of course).] -Miles -- Would you like fries with that?
Re: Bug#242343: debian-installer beta 3 sparc netinst image failed to boot up on Ultra10
[CC:ing debian-sparc to notify the other interested parties.] On Tue, 06 Apr 2004 13:48:57 +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote: > Package: debian-installer > Version: beta3 > Severity: grave Aha. That's a known broken version, sorry. debian-cd was using a bad silo.conf. See below for more details... > boot: linux root=/dev/hdc mount=devfs,dall rw ... > Please fix it or teach me how to fix it if you know something about > it. Try linux root=/dev/rd/0 devfs=mount rw and see if that works. Or just try a daily CD image. I think manty fixed everything related to this issue, please notify us if you find otherwise. -- Joshua Kwan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#224634: marked as done (discover loads ide-scsi module, which prevents apt from accessing some ide cdroms)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#221983: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Dec 2003 23:36:42 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Dec 10 17:36:38 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mk-smarthost-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com [212.74.114.39] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AUCsf-0001rZ-00; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 16:32:29 -0600 Received: from [80.225.12.97] (helo=ceredigion.acorns.net) by mk-smarthost-3.mail.uk.tiscali.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AUCsb-0009aL-Lq for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Wed, 10 Dec 2003 22:32:26 + From: Barrie James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installer Report - CD boot problem, IDE_SCSI module prevents IDE CDROM mounting, and inflexibility in options - but good hardware detection and working sound. Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2003 22:34:04 + User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 X-Spam-Level: Package:installation-reports Debian-installer-version: download 21 November - http://gluck.debian.org/ cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta-1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso 100MB uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i686= =20 GNU/Linux Date: 25 or 26 Nov. Method: Tried to boot CD (see comments), failed, and then used floppy image= to=20 boot the CD. Machine: Self-build. EPOX 8KHA+ Mobo (VIA KT266A, VT8366A and VT8233 onboar= d=20 sound)=20 Processor: AMD XP 1600+ Memory: 256MB DDR Root Device: IDE (IBM ATA100 HDD) : /dev/hda13 Root Size/partition table: A 5GB single partition on an existing extended=20 partition Output of lspci:=20 00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8366/A/7 [Apollo KT266/A/333] 00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8366/A/7 [Apollo KT266/A/333 A= GP] 00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3cSOHO100-TX Hurricane (rev 3= 0) 00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233 PCI to ISA Bridge 00:11.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT82= 33/ A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06) 00:11.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 1b) 00:11.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 1b) 00:11.4 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 1b) 00:11.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233/A/8235 A= C97=20 Audio Controller (rev 30) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G400 AGP (rev = 04) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked: =A0 =A0[E] Configure network HW: =A0 [O] Config network: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 [E] Detect CD: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0[E] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: =A0 =A0 [O] Partition hard drives: =A0[ ] Create file systems: =A0 =A0[O] Mount partitions: =A0 =A0 =A0 [O] Install base system: =A0 =A0[O] Install boot loader: =A0 =A0[E] Reboot: =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 [O] [O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try it Comments/Problems: 1) This is the first CD that has ever failed to boot on my system. It boote= d a=20 laptop OK, but my system failed completely. I've installed a range of distr= os=20 on this box - Potato, Woody r0, Woody r1, Slackware 8, 9, 9.1, Mandrake 8.1= ,=20 8.2, 9 without any problems booting. I had the first few Sarge unofficial C= Ds=20 from the .hu mirror and the first of these booted fine. The boot device=20 selector floppy image on the installer CD solved the problem and I was able= =20 to start the process from the CD after booting the floppy. 2) I suffered the IDE-SCSI module problem (which I hadn't seen at the time)= =2E=20 As I had got a few of the unofficial Sarge CDs I intended to register them = as=20 apt sources during the install, but this failed. Following the reboot it wa= s=20 clear that this was down to the IDE CD not being mounted. I got round it by= =20 simply removing the IDE-SCSI module and accessing the
Bug#221983: marked as done (ide-scsi problem again, with a solution: /dev/sr0 in fstab!)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#221983: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 21 Nov 2003 13:40:52 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 21 07:40:51 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp4.wanadoo.fr (mwinf0402.wanadoo.fr) [193.252.22.27] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1ANBWl-0005ph-00; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:40:51 -0600 Received: from druuna.vipere.noire (AToulouse-105-1-32-12.w81-248.abo.wanadoo.fr [81.248.25.12]) by mwinf0402.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 2A13580013E for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:40:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from julie.vipere.noire (julie.vipere.noire [192.168.6.6]) by druuna.vipere.noire (8.9.3p2/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id OAA06196 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:40:14 +0100 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by julie.vipere.noire (8.12.9/8.12.9/Debian-5) with ESMTP id hALDeDgp001741 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:40:14 +0100 Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 14:40:13 +0100 (CET) From: Thomas Nemeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Thomas Nemeth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: problems with ethernet card Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE,USER_AGENT_PINE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_20 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-16 uname -a: Linux durham 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i586 GNU/Linux Date: Thu Nov 20 18:33:49 CET 2003 Method: - How did you install? netinst sarge minimal CD (113 MB) - What did you boot off? The CDRom - If network install, from where? Proxied? network from http://http.us.debian.org and nonus not proxied. Machine: Custom-made Processor: AMD K6-2 450 Memory: 256M Root Device: ide (/dev/hda2) Root Size/partition table: Disk /dev/hda: 1246 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track Units = cylinders of 8225280 bytes, blocks of 1024 bytes, counting from 0 Device Boot Start End #cyls#blocks Id System /dev/hda1 0+ 15 16-128488+ 82 Linux swap /dev/hda2 16 79 64 514080 83 Linux /dev/hda3 801245116693658955 Extended /dev/hda4 0 - 0 00 Empty /dev/hda5 80+207 128- 1028128+ 83 Linux /dev/hda6208+233 26-208813+ 83 Linux /dev/hda7234+259 26-208813+ 83 Linux /dev/hda8260+412 153- 1228941 83 Linux /dev/hda9413+ 1245 833- 6691041 83 Linux Output of lspci: 00:00.0 Host bridge: ALi Corporation M1541 (rev 04) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: ALi Corporation M1541 PCI to AGP Controller (rev 04) 00:03.0 Bridge: ALi Corporation M7101 PMU 00:07.0 ISA bridge: ALi Corporation M1533 PCI to ISA Bridge [Aladdin IV] (rev c3) 00:09.0 Multimedia audio controller: Ensoniq ES1371 [AudioPCI-97] (rev 08) 00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT86C100A [Rhine] (rev 06) 00:0f.0 IDE interface: ALi Corporation M5229 IDE (rev c1) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV5M64 [RIVA TNT2 Model 64/Model 64 Pro] (rev 15) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [ ] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: Problems with cdrom player that could not be accessed at reboot. Since ide-scsi is compiled in, /etc/fstab should refer to /dev/sr0 instead of /dev/hdX. A change in /etc/fstab fixed it. Sometimes, at reboot, my DFE-530-TX rev A1 is not recognized and via-rhine gives "Invalid MAC address for card #0". Booting from a potato CD never gives this problem... Thomas ---
Bug#220936: marked as done (ide-scsi breaks use of CD after reboot)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#220936: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Nov 2003 18:43:51 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 15 12:43:49 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from tarnica.ctnet.pl [212.126.24.132] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AL5Oe-0003aO-00; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 12:43:48 -0600 Received: from miernik by tarnica.ctnet.pl with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1AL5OY-J7-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 15 Nov 2003 19:43:42 +0100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Jan 'Miernik' Macek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: installation-reports: mostly successfill install, ide-scsi emulation made CD unaccessible, CD not bootable in _my_ drive X-Mailer: reportbug 2.36 Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2003 19:43:42 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_15 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: installation-reports Severity: normal *** install-report.template_20031109 Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 2003-11-09 http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/netinst/i386/beta-1/sarge-i386-netinst.iso 118,161,408 bytes uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.22-1-386 #9 Sat Oct 4 14:30:39 EST 2003 i586 GNU/Linux Date: 2003-11-14 07:08 CET till 2003-11-15 13:15 CET Method: booting from sarge-i386-netinst in my standard IDE CD-ROM drive Machine: ASUS TX97-X Processor: Intel Pentium MMX 200 MHz Memory: 256 MB Root Device: /dev/hdb6 IBM IC35L040AVER07-0 (you should specify does "name of device" mean something like /dev/hdb6 or the model name of the hard drive) Root Size/partition table: Partition Table for /dev/hdb ---Starting--- EndingStart Number of # Flags Head Sect Cyl ID Head Sect Cyl SectorSectors -- - --- --- 1 0x00110 0x83 254 63 248 63 4000122 2 0x00000 0x00000 0 0 3 0x0001 313 0x05 254 63 1023 502834536820980 4 0x00000 0x00000 0 0 5 0x0011 313 0x83 254 63 1023 6332001417 6 0x00 254 63 1023 0x83 254 63 1023 1 128519 7 0x00 254 63 1023 0x83 254 63 1023 1 2088449 8 0x00 254 63 1023 0x83 254 63 1023 1 2088449 9 0x00 254 63 1023 0x83 254 63 1023 1 514079 localhost:~# df -Tm FilesystemType 1M-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/hdb6 ext2 613920 67% / /dev/hdb9 ext2 244 1 231 1% /tmp /dev/hdb7 ext31004 106 848 12% /usr /dev/hdb8 reiserfs102042 979 5% /var /dev/hda7 ext2 306 24545 85% /home /dev/hda1 ext2 6255 4 95% /mnt Output of lspci: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 430TX - 82439TX MTXC (rev 01) 00:01.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 01) 00:01.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01) 00:01.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01) 00:01.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 01) 00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) 00:0c.0 VGA compatible controller: S3 Inc. ViRGE/DX or /GX (rev 01) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[E] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [E] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: Initial boot worked:[E] This CD didn't want to boot in my CD-ROM drive at all. It acts exactly as if there was
Bug#241840: marked as done (discover1 should conflict with libdiscover2)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#241840: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2004 10:49:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 03 02:49:05 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from smtp2.su.se [130.237.93.212] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B9ii1-0005Mo-00; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 02:49:05 -0800 Received: from localhost (smtp2.su.se [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.su.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83D422001C6 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 3 Apr 2004 12:49:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp2.su.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2.su.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 15780-02-6 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 3 Apr 2004 12:49:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from unni.dsv.su.se (unni.dsv.su.se [130.237.161.27]) by smtp2.su.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C90D2B for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 3 Apr 2004 12:49:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from triton.dsv.su.se (triton.dsv.su.se [130.237.177.14]) by unni.dsv.su.se (Postfix) with SMTP id 467D28B339 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sat, 3 Apr 2004 12:49:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: by triton.dsv.su.se (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sat, 3 Apr 2004 12:49:03 +0200 From: "Per Olofsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2004 12:49:03 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: discover1 should conflict with libdiscover2 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at su.se Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: discover1 Version: 1.5-7 Unpacking discover1 (from .../discover1_1.5-7_i386.deb) ... dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/discover1_1.5-7_i386.deb (--unpack): trying to overwrite `/usr/share/man/man5/discover.conf.5.gz', which is also in package libdiscover2 -- Pelle --- Received: (at 241840-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2004 05:08:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 05 22:08:02 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAioc-0002XX-00; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 22:08:02 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAiit-0003RA-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.46 $ Subject: Bug#241840: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 14 14 Source: discover1 Source-Version: 1.5-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of discover1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz discover1_1.5-8.dsc to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.dsc discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp
Bug#220704: marked as done (ide-scsi stuff breaks apt for cdrom)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#220704: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Nov 2003 08:53:02 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Nov 14 02:52:58 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from mail.iok.net (mail05.iok.net) [62.249.129.22] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AKZhG-0005fm-00; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 02:52:56 -0600 Received: from lin01.mn-logistik.de (frdb-d9b94dfd.pool.mediaWays.net [217.185.77.253]) by mail05.iok.net (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hAE8qqOU015720 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:52:53 +0100 Received: from mnz66.mn-logistik.de (mnz66.mn-logistik.de [192.168.233.66]) by lin01.mn-logistik.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD2B1FF60 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:18:54 +0100 (CET) From: Holger Schurig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: wrong CDROM instantiation Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2003 09:18:53 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_13 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_11_13 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: debian-installer Version: 20031109 I used the sarge-testing1 CD on two computers. In both cases I had the problem that the debian-installer was asking for the CDROM as source, but was unable to mount it. On the console I managed to do rmmod ide-scsi modprobe ide-cd and then I was able to mount. --- Received: (at 220704-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2004 05:09:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 05 22:09:14 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAipm-0002e3-00; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 22:09:14 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAiit-0003Qy-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.46 $ Subject: Bug#220704: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 8 8 Source: discover1 Source-Version: 1.5-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of discover1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz discover1_1.5-8.dsc to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.dsc discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated discover1 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2004 00:06:52 -0400 Source: discover1 Binary: libdiscover1 discover1 libdiscover1-pic discover1-udeb lib
Bug#214622: marked as done (Cut: command not found)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#214622: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Oct 2003 18:16:42 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Oct 07 13:16:41 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (socionomics.net) [12.166.244.34] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A6wO1-0008Ox-00; Tue, 07 Oct 2003 13:16:41 -0500 Received: from socionomics.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by socionomics.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) with ESMTP id h97IGbRX020595; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 14:16:37 -0400 Received: (from [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by socionomics.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-6.6) id h97IGber020593; Tue, 7 Oct 2003 14:16:37 -0400 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> From: "D. Goel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Cut: command not found X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2003 14:16:37 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_05 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: discover Version: 1.5-1.1 Severity: normal Whenevr i boot, i see a message something like this: S15discover: cut: command not found. All debian stable. I do have textutils intalled. -- System Information Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux socionomics.net 2.4.20 #1 Thu Sep 18 13:12:19 EDT 2003 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE= Versions of packages discover depends on: ii ash 0.4.1 Compatibility package for the Debi ii debconf 1.2.16 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdiscover1 1.5-1.1hardware identification library --- Received: (at 214622-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2004 05:09:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 05 22:09:14 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAipl-0002db-00; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 22:09:14 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAiit-0003Qw-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.46 $ Subject: Bug#214622: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 7 7 Source: discover1 Source-Version: 1.5-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of discover1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz discover1_1.5-8.dsc to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.dsc discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated discover1 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED
Bug#213866: marked as done (discover: extend manpage see-also section)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#213866: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Oct 2003 06:23:59 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Oct 03 01:23:58 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from bast.u.arizona.edu [128.196.133.225] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1A5JM5-Ai-00; Fri, 03 Oct 2003 01:23:57 -0500 Received: from bast.u.arizona.edu (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [127.0.0.1]) by bast.u.arizona.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id h936NuYQ002157 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 23:23:56 -0700 (MST) Received: from localhost ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) by bast.u.arizona.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) with ESMTP id h936NssI002154 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 2 Oct 2003 23:23:55 -0700 (MST) X-Authentication-Warning: bast.u.arizona.edu: andrel owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2003 23:23:54 -0700 (MST) From: Andre Lehovich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: discover: extend manpage see-also section Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_1 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_10_1 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: discover Severity: wishlist Version: 1.5-1.4.1 I suggest adding lspci(8) and mdetect(1) to the SEE ALSO section of the discover(8) man page. lspci is already mentioned elsewhere in the document so it should appear at the end for completeness, and mdetect provides hardware detection capability not found in discover. If there are other autodetectors they should also be added. Rationale: discover is one of the more famous auto-detectors in Debian, so it is likely to be the first tool someone checks when trying to get a new device working. Thanks, --Andre --- Received: (at 213866-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2004 05:09:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 05 22:09:13 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAipl-0002dI-00; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 22:09:13 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAiit-0003Qu-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.46 $ Subject: Bug#213866: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 6 6 Source: discover1 Source-Version: 1.5-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of discover1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz discover1_1.5-8.dsc to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.dsc discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated discover1 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archiv
Bug#178944: marked as done (discover: depends on mounted /usr)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#178944: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jan 2003 17:12:23 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jan 29 11:12:23 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from up.physik.fu-berlin.de [160.45.34.5] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 18dvl8-0006mZ-00; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:12:22 -0600 Received: from pluto.physik.fu-berlin.de (pluto.physik.fu-berlin.de [160.45.33.82]) by up.physik.fu-berlin.de (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA899599; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 18:12:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from glaweh by pluto.physik.fu-berlin.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18dvku-MN-00; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 18:12:08 +0100 From: Henning Glawe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: discover: depends on mounted /usr X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 18:12:06 +0100 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Henning Glawe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0 tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01 version=2.41 X-Spam-Level: Package: discover Version: 1.1-6 Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Because discover depends on various stuff on /usr and /var, which is _not_ mounted the time discover runs, it either should be run after S35mountall or the dependencys should be resolved or moved to "/". so the package is unusable in woody, and because network is not available (whithout manual help), so is the whole system in an environment depending on this. a fix for it is definately needed for woody/stable. -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux pluto 2.4.18-zedv-athlon #1 Mon May 6 20:26:26 CEST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages discover depends on: ii ash 0.3.8-37 NetBSD /bin/sh ii libc6 2.2.5-11.2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdiscover1 1.1-6 hardware identification library --- Received: (at 178944-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2004 05:08:05 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 05 22:08:05 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAiof-0002YN-00; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 22:08:05 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAiit-0003Qq-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.46 $ Subject: Bug#178944: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 4 4 Source: discover1 Source-Version: 1.5-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of discover1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz discover1_1.5-8.dsc to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.dsc discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated discover1 package) (This mes
Bug#166460: marked as done (/etc/init.d/discover; if you're going to use sed...)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#166460: fixed in discover1 1.5-8
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Oct 2002 14:55:17 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Oct 26 09:55:15 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from science.horizon.com [192.35.100.1]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 185SLL-000866-00; Sat, 26 Oct 2002 09:55:15 -0500
Received: (qmail 5526 invoked by uid 1000); 26 Oct 2002 14:54:44 -
Date: 26 Oct 2002 14:54:44 -
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: /etc/init.d/discover; if you're going to use sed...
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0
tests=NO_REAL_NAME,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: discover
Version: 1.5-1
Severity: wishlist
I just discovered that discover's serial probing interacts badly
with a Best power FerrUPS, which accepts the command "AlarmTest",
abbrevisted to "AT", and starts beeping as if it's out of power.
So that's led me to adjust the boot scripts a little, and I couldn't
help noticing awkward constructs in /etc/init.d/discover like:
ARGUMENTS=$(sed "s/#.*$//" $CONFFILE | grep "^boot " | cut -c6-)
As long as you're using sed, you don't need separate executables for
grep and cut:
ARGUMENTS=$(sed -n "s/#.*$//;s/^boot //p" $CONFFILE)
Similarly, the whole skip() function seems a little awkward.
How about accumulating the list to skip once in a shall variable and
just searching through that...
SKIPLIST=""
if test -f $CONFFILE; then
test -f $SKIPFILE || SKIPFILE=""
SKIPLIST=$(sed -n 's/#.*$//;y/ / /;s/ */ /g;s/^ *skip \([^ ][^ ]*\)/\1/p'
$CONFFILE $SKIPFILE)
fi
skip()
{
echo "$SKIPLIST" | grep -wq -e "$1"
}
That sed script emulates the existing behaviour exactly, although
including all the words after "skip", not just $2, might be nicer...
SKIPLIST=$(sed -n 's/#.*$//;y/ / /;s/ */ /g;s/^ *skip //p' $CONFFILE $SKIPFILE)
Note that that's "y///".
Yuo can break the various sed commands into separate arguments, but
then you have to put "-e" in front of each.
---
Received: (at 166460-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2004 05:09:11 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 05 22:09:11 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BAipj-0002bX-00; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 22:09:11 -0700
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BAiit-0003Qo-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.46 $
Subject: Bug#166460: fixed in discover1 1.5-8
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 3 3
Source: discover1
Source-Version: 1.5-8
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
discover1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb
discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz
discover1_1.5-8.dsc
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.dsc
discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb
libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb
libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb
libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb
to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
David Nusinow <[EMAIL
Bug#160658: marked as done (libdiscover-dev: SMP cpu detection doesn't work, error in code)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#160658: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 12 Sep 2002 14:11:56 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Sep 12 09:11:56 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (mail.meditrans.fr) [212.208.234.123] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17pUhG-00058P-00; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 09:11:54 -0500 Received: from tpoindessous by thomas with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 17pUhF-0003vp-00; Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:11:53 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ANSI_X3.4-1968" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Thomas Poindessous" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Debian Bug Tracking System" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: =?ansi_x3.4-1968?q?libdiscover-dev:?= cpu detection =?ansi_x3.4-1968?q?doesn't?= work with SMP =?ansi_x3.4-1968?q?(problem?= with getline =?ansi_x3.4-1968?q??)?= X-Mailer: reportbug 1.99.54 Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 16:11:53 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: libdiscover-dev Version: 1.5-1 Severity: normal Hi, cpu detection doesn't work with SMP. You can test with cpudetect[1] from debian-installer (remove #include "libdetect.h"). I read the source, and I can't understand why getline returns a value < 0 when the line is "\n". (in lib/cpu.c ) And BTW, line need to be initialized to NULL in lib/cpu.c:25 Thanks. [1] : http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/tools/ddetect/Attic/cpudetect.c?rev=1.3&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux thomas 2.4.19-686 #1 Thu Aug 8 21:30:09 EST 2002 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C Versions of packages libdiscover-dev depends on: ii libc6-dev 2.2.5-14.1 GNU C Library: Development Librari ii libdiscover1 1.5-1 hardware identification library -- no debconf information --- Received: (at 160658-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2004 05:09:11 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 05 22:09:11 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAipi-0002bL-00; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 22:09:11 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAiit-0003Qm-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.46 $ Subject: Bug#160658: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 2 2 Source: discover1 Source-Version: 1.5-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of discover1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz discover1_1.5-8.dsc to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.dsc discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated discover1 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archi
Bug#152604: marked as done (discover: linuxrc must have executable bits in initrd)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#152604: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 11 Jul 2002 09:41:15 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 11 04:41:15 2002 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from h-213.61.130.101.host.de.colt.net (robin.bonelabs.loc) [213.61.130.101] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian)) id 17SaRm-0006OA-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 04:41:14 -0500 Received: from oku by robin.bonelabs.loc with local (masqmail 0.2.10) id 17SaPk-7If-00; Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:39:08 +0200 From: Oliver Kurth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: discover: linuxrc must have executable bits in initrd X-Mailer: reportbug 1.50 Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:39:08 +0200 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> X-BadReturnPath: [EMAIL PROTECTED] rewritten as [EMAIL PROTECTED] using "From" header Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Package: discover Version: 1.5-1 Severity: normal Tags: patch The linuxrc script in the initrd should have the executabke bits set, other wise it will not be ececuted on boot (I tried with 2.4.17). --- update-initrd.orig Fri Apr 26 21:00:32 2002 +++ update-initrd Thu Jul 11 11:34:19 2002 @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ message_nonl "copying files..." message_nonl "/ " cp /usr/share/discover/linuxrc $ROOT/linuxrc +chmod a+x $ROOT/linuxrc message_nonl "/bin " mkdir -m 755 $ROOT/bin cp /bin/ash $ROOT/bin/sh -- System Information Debian Release: 3.0 Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux robin 2.4.16-pre1 #1 Mon Nov 26 17:57:01 CET 2001 i686 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE= Versions of packages discover depends on: ii ash 0.3.8-38 NetBSD /bin/sh ii debconf 1.0.32 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.2.5-6GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdiscover1 1.5-1 hardware identification library --- Received: (at 152604-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2004 05:08:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 05 22:08:06 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAiog-0002YZ-00; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 22:08:06 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAiit-0003Qk-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.46 $ Subject: Bug#152604: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1 1 Source: discover1 Source-Version: 1.5-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of discover1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz discover1_1.5-8.dsc to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.dsc discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated discover1 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECT
Bug#201695: marked as done (discover: problem with ide-scsi and devfs)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#201695: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jul 2003 10:38:41 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 17 05:37:27 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from host37-244.pool80117.interbusiness.it (alkatraz.nakta.mine.nu) [80.117.244.37] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 19d68c-0005OY-00; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 05:37:26 -0500 Received: by alkatraz.nakta.mine.nu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 06409C64E; Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:37:24 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" From: Alessio Dessi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: discover: problem with ide-scsi and devfs X-Mailer: reportbug 2.19 Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 12:37:24 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_06_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp) Package: discover Version: 1.5-1.4 Severity: normal to me seems that discover is not able to configure properly ide-scsi devices if devfs is running. this is the console output after installation Adding system startup for /etc/init.d/discover ... /etc/rcS.d/S36discover -> ../init.d/discover Detecting hardware: rtl8139 usb-ohci Skipping rtl8139 module; assuming it is compiled into the kernel. Loading usb-ohci module. discover reports that /dev/scd0 is a CD/DVD device, but it does not exist. Not updating /dev/cdrom0. discover reports that /dev/scd1 is a CD/DVD device, but it does not exist. Not updating /dev/cdrom0. No CD/DVD drives found. Alessio Dessi -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable Architecture: i386 Kernel: Linux alkatraz 2.4.20-3-k7 #1 Sun Jun 8 01:35:14 EST 2003 i686 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Versions of packages discover depends on: ii dash 0.4.17 The Debian Almquist Shell ii debconf 1.3.4 Debian configuration management sy ii libc6 2.3.1-17 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an ii libdiscover1 1.5-1.4hardware identification library -- debconf information: * discover/manage_cdrom_devices: true discover/cdrom_base_mountpoint: / discover/cdrom_base_mountpoint_error: --- Received: (at 201695-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2004 05:09:12 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 05 22:09:12 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAipk-0002bj-00; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 22:09:12 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAiit-0003Qs-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.46 $ Subject: Bug#201695: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 5 5 Source: discover1 Source-Version: 1.5-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of discover1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz discover1_1.5-8.dsc to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.dsc discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to poo
Bug#224528: marked as done (cdrom-detect: confused /dev/hdc /dev/sr0)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#220704: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Dec 2003 21:28:42 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Dec 19 15:28:41 2003 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from macwheel.xs4all.nl (gpm.stappers.nl) [213.84.119.166] by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1AXRrP-Dt-00; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 15:08:35 -0600 Received: by gpm.stappers.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A666B1800; Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:08:34 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2003 22:08:34 +0100 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: cdrom-detect: confused /dev/hdc /dev/sr0 Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; from [EMAIL PROTECTED] on Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 06:11:12PM +0100 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Geert Stappers) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-master.debian.org_2003_11_25-bugs.debian.org_2003_12_15 X-Spam-Level: Package: cdrom-detect Tag: d-i Severity: normal >From a post on debian-boot mailinglist. On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 06:11:12PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2003 at 12:15:57PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I installed Sarge, Nov-17 (unofficial) and noticed a few problems, > > though not any thing major. > > 3. When choosing CD installation, the /cdrom is not mounted automatically. > > The reason is that fstab has wrong entries. the entry in fstab for > > /cdrom is /dev/hdc, while it should have been /dev/sr0. > > Mounting /dev/sr0 from a second console and > > hitting enter in the first console prompt solves this problem. > Will be reported as bug. > So here is the bugreport. --- Received: (at 220704-close) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2004 05:09:14 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 05 22:09:14 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAipm-0002e3-00; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 22:09:14 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BAiit-0003Qy-00; Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.46 $ Subject: Bug#220704: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Archive Administrator <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_YAHOO_RCVD, HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 8 8 Source: discover1 Source-Version: 1.5-8 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of discover1, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz discover1_1.5-8.dsc to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.dsc discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated discover1 package) (This message was generated automatically at th
Bug#238472: marked as done (discover should not load i810-tco module)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#238472: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Mar 2004 07:26:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 16 23:26:06 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from (mx1.ustc.edu.cn) [218.22.21.1] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B3VRF-00081F-00; Tue, 16 Mar 2004 23:26:05 -0800 Received: from winter ([202.38.76.136]) by mx1.ustc.edu.cn (8.8.7/8.8.6) with ESMTP id PAA18093; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:25:44 +0800 Received: from roger by winter with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1B3VQw-kA-00; Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:25:47 +0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Wang WenRui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: installation-reports: default base system reboots automatically X-Mailer: reportbug 2.53 Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2004 15:25:46 +0800 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable Debian-installer-version: beta 3 from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ uname -a: Linux winter 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 2004-03-17 15:00 GMT+8 Method: 100 MB CD image, includes Debian base, no network install yet. Machine: PC (vendor: LEGEND) Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz Memory: 512MB Root Device: Maxtor 6Y080L0, ATA DISK drive Root Size/partition table: Disk /dev/hda: 78.1 GB, 78197737472 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 9507 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 * 11020 8193118+ 7 HPFS/NTFS /dev/hda21021950668163795f W95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/hda51021363120972826 83 Linux /dev/hda63632624220972826 83 Linux /dev/hda762436275 265041 82 Linux swap /dev/hda86276950625952976 83 Linux root partition is /dev/hda8 and swap is /dev/hda7, others are not mounted. Output of lspci: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 82845G/GL [Brookdale-G] Chipset Host Bridge (rev 03) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82845G/GL [Brookdale-G] Chipset AGP Bridge (rev 03) 00:1d.0 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB USB (Hub #1) (rev 02) 00:1d.1 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB USB (Hub #2) (rev 02) 00:1d.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB USB (Hub #3) (rev 02) 00:1d.7 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB USB2 (rev 02) 00:1e.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 82801BA/CA/DB/EB PCI Bridge (rev 82) 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82801DB LPC Interface Controller (rev 02) 00:1f.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82801DB Ultra ATA Storage Controller (rev 02) 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corp. 82801DB/DBM SMBus Controller (rev 02) 00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 02) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX 400] (rev b2) 02:0e.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: It reboots automatically when I configuring the base system, and reboot agian just when the system
Bug#240308: marked as done (Discover: Spanish debconf translation)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#240308: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Mar 2004 17:40:13 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Mar 26 09:40:13 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from tornado.dat.etsit.upm.es.etsit.upm.es (dat.etsit.upm.es) [138.100.17.73] by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B6vJV-I5-00; Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:40:13 -0800 Received: (qmail 18696 invoked by uid 1013); 26 Mar 2004 17:40:10 - Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 18:40:10 +0100 From: Javier =?iso-8859-15?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Discover: Spanish debconf translation Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi" Content-Disposition: inline --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: discover Version: 1.5-3 Priority: wishlist Tags: l10n Please find attached the spanish debconf translation for discover, reviewed= =20 by the debian-l10n-spanish mailing list. Thanks Javier --6c2NcOVqGQ03X4Wi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="discover-debconf.es.po" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable # discover debconf translation to Spanish # Copyright (C) 2004 Software in the Public Interest # This file is distributed under the same license as the discover package. # # Changes: # - Initial translation # Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pe=F1a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2004 # # # Traductores, si no conoce el formato PO, merece la pena leer la=20 # documentaci=F3n de gettext, especialmente las secciones dedicadas a este # formato, por ejemplo ejecutando: # info -n '(gettext)PO Files' # info -n '(gettext)Header Entry' # # Equipo de traducci=F3n al espa=F1ol, por favor, lean antes de traducir # los siguientes documentos: #=20 # - El proyecto de traducci=F3n de Debian al espa=F1ol # http://www.debian.org/intl/spanish/coordinacion # especialmente las notas de traducci=F3n en # http://www.debian.org/intl/spanish/notas # # - La gu=EDa de traducci=F3n de po's de debconf: # /usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans # o http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans # msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: discover 1.5-3\n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2003-11-17 18:46+0100\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2004-03-19 23:50+0100\n" "Last-Translator: Javier Fernandez-Sanguino Pe=F1a <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "Language-Team: Debian Spanish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../discover.templates:4 msgid "Manage CD-ROM devices and mount points with discover?" msgstr "=BFDesea gestionar los dispositivos de CD-ROM y sus puntos de monta= je con discover?" #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../discover.templates:4 msgid "" "The \"discover\" program can automatically manage the /dev/cdrom* symbolic= " "links and device mount points, if you desire. The available CD-ROM (and " "compatible) devices are scanned at boot-time and these links and mount " "points can be automatically updated." msgstr "Si lo desea, el programa =ABdiscover=BB puede gestionar de forma au= tom=E1tica los enlaces simb=F3licos a /dev/cdrom* y los puntos de montaje d= e los dispositivos. Se realiza un sondeo en el arranque del sistema de los = dispositivos CD-ROM (y compatibles) disponibles y se actualizan de forma au= tom=E1tica dichos enlaces y puntos de montaje." #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../discover.templates:4 msgid "" "If you enable this option, discover will link /dev/cdrom to /dev/cdrom0 fo= r " "convenience." msgstr "Si activa esta opci=F3n, =ABdiscover=BB enlazar=E1 /dev/cdro
Bug#241841: marked as done (discover1: Updated Danish debconf-po translation)
Your message dated Tue, 06 Apr 2004 01:02:07 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#241841: fixed in discover1 1.5-8 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Apr 2004 11:01:49 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Apr 03 03:01:49 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from fitch4.uni2.net [130.227.52.107] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B9iuL-00060O-00; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 03:01:49 -0800 Received: from reber (129.142.124.192.ip.tele2adsl.dk [129.142.124.192]) by fitch4.uni2.net (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i33B1kZS023716; Sat, 3 Apr 2004 13:01:46 +0200 Received: from claus by reber with local (Exim 4.30) id 1B9iuZ-0001HE-1n; Sat, 03 Apr 2004 13:02:03 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===1528954788==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Claus Hindsgaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: discover1: Updated Danish debconf-po translation X-Mailer: reportbug 2.56 Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 13:02:02 +0200 Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sender: Claus Hindsgaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: This is a multi-part MIME message sent by reportbug. --===1528954788== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Package: discover1 Version: sid Severity: normal Tags: patch l10n Please use the attached updated Danish (da.po) debconf-po translation -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers unstable APT policy: (600, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25 Locale: LANG=da_DK, LC_CTYPE=da_DK --===1528954788== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="da.po" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by fitch4.uni2.net id i33B1kZS023716 # translation of da.po to Danish # #Translators, if you are not familiar with the PO format, gettext #documentation is worth reading, especially sections dedicated to #this format, e.g. by running: # info -n '(gettext)PO Files' # info -n '(gettext)Header Entry' #Some information specific to po-debconf are available at #/usr/share/doc/po-debconf/README-trans # or http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/README-trans# #Developers do not need to manually edit POT or PO files. # Claus Hindsgaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2004. # msgid "" msgstr "" "Project-Id-Version: da\n" "Report-Msgid-Bugs-To: \n" "POT-Creation-Date: 2003-11-17 18:46+0100\n" "PO-Revision-Date: 2004-04-03 12:59+0200\n" "Last-Translator: Claus Hindsgaul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "Language-Team: Danish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>\n" "MIME-Version: 1.0\n" "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3DISO-8859-1\n" "Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit\n" "X-Generator: KBabel 1.3.1\n" #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../discover.templates:4 msgid "Manage CD-ROM devices and mount points with discover?" msgstr "H=E5ndt=E9r cdrom-drev og monteringspunkter med discover?" #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../discover.templates:4 msgid "" "The \"discover\" program can automatically manage the /dev/cdrom* symbol= ic " "links and device mount points, if you desire. The available CD-ROM (and= " "compatible) devices are scanned at boot-time and these links and mount " "points can be automatically updated." msgstr "" "Hvis du =F8nsker det, kan programmet \"discover\" kan automatisk h=E5ndt= ere de " "symbolske \"/dev/cdrom\"-l=E6nker og cdrom-drevenes monteringspunkter. D= er " "bliver s=F8gt efter tilg=E6ngelige cdrom-drev (og kompatible) under opst= arten, " "hvorefter l=E6nker og monteringspunkter automatisk bliver opdateret." #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../discover.templates:4 msgid "" "If you enable this option, discover will link /dev/cdrom to /dev/cdrom0 = for " "convenience." msgstr "" "Hvis du aktiverer denne funktion, vil discover for letheds skyld l=E6nke= /dev/" "cdrom til /dev/cdrom0." #. Type: boolean #. Description #: ../discover.templates:4 msg
Re: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Claus Färber) writes: > BTW, there are a lot of other names from ISO 3166 that IMO should be > changed for everyday use: > > Short name contains unnecessary parts from the full official name > (probably for political hyper-correctness): > > IRAN, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF;IR=> IRAN > LAO PEOPLE'S DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC;LA => LAOS > MICRONESIA, FEDERATED STATES OF;FM => MICRONESIA > MOLDOVA, REPUBLIC OF;MD => MOLDOVA > TANZANIA, UNITED REPUBLIC OF;TZ => TANZANIA In all of these cases, a consistent form is followed: The part after the comma forms a proper prefix of the `common' name, and when used gives you the country's self-declared official name; taking the part before the comma gives you the common name[1]. This makes automatic processing easy. Removing the part after the comma from the database for the above countries yields no benefit. It's only Taiwan that's weird, because (1) the resulting long name isn't a real name at all, but the rather awkward construct: "Province of China Taiwan" and obviously (2) that isn't the self-declared name of the country[2]. > A different short name is more common (again, the UN name was probably > chosen for political correctness): > > KOREA, DEMOCRATIC PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF;KP => KOREA, NORTH > KOREA, REPUBLIC OF;KR => KOREA, SOUTH These names are[3] those chosen by the respective countries -- _that_ is something I thing ought to be respected (so if Taiwan were to suddenly start calling itself [in English] `Province of China Taiwan', well then the argument is over I guess :-). [1] The exceptions seem to be Laos, where the most common english name used isn't present, and perhaps North/South Korea, as discussed above. [2] Which as far as I can figure is "Republic of China (Taiwan)"; I'm not sure how one would actually fit this into the comma-separated-prefix scheme... :-/ [3] Again, as far as I can figure -Miles -- Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
Re: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 07:28:49PM -0600, Paul E Condon wrote: > Given what I understand of the politics and history of Taiwan/China, I > think it is unlikely that the two use the same language *in every detail*. > Particularly, I doubt that their usage of technical language jargon is the > same. I'm just a naïve gaijin[1], but I'm not sure you're right about that. Written zh_CN and zh_TW look very similar to Western eyes. I've seen a comparison of the two in some Sun documentation, and they really just looked like the exact same glyphs in two different fonts. Like look at English lettering in bold versus normal weight. (Not *exactly* like that, but close). Sun Microsystems has a lot of expertise in this area. We have nothing to gain by taking sides political conflicts like this. The Debian OS can be customized by regional interests if needed. Beijing and Taipei can each make their own politically-correct forks of Debian if they need to, deleting offensive nomenclature about the other country. Similarly, Kurds in Iraq or Turkey may create "Kurdistan GNU/Linux", to the irritation of the Turkish government and the U.S. occupation force in Iraq. Chechen rebels or Basque separatists could fork Debian, too. IMO, we should neither try to take a strong position on these politically explosive issues, nor should we try to walk on eggshells. I think we should take a similar approach as we do to package management. If we have developer(s) willing to vouch for legitimacy of a locale, and willing to maintain support for it, we should include it. If some governmental interest needs to bowdlerize our distribution to satisify their political sensibilities, they can go ahead. I think it says a lot about Debian success that we've come as far as we have -- we're a long way from worrying about fortunes-off and the Purity Test. Now we're worried about pissing off governments. :) If any Chinese would like to offer me some education on this subject in private mail, please feel free. I have read the Wikipedia article on the Republic of China[3] already, though. [1] Yes, I know that's not a Chinese word. [2] At the same time, from my modest knowledge of Chinese history since 1949, it's hard to find "neutral" terminology. Neutral terms about this issue seem to get perverted over time into euphemisms for either unificiation or independence, and then become political footballs. [3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Republic_of_China -- G. Branden Robinson|I reverse the phrase of Voltaire, Debian GNU/Linux |and say that if God really existed, [EMAIL PROTECTED] |it would be necessary to abolish http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |him. -- Mikhail Bakunin signature.asc Description: Digital signature
discover1_1.5-8_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz discover1_1.5-8.dsc to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8.dsc discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb to pool/main/d/discover1/libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 152604 160658 166460 178944 201695 213866 214622 220704 220936 221983 224634 238472 240308 241840 241841 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Processing discover1 bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 235107 wontfix Bug#235107: discover: Run only at install There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > tags 235579 wontfix Bug#235579: discover should be able to edit the module configuration There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > merge 235579 235107 Bug#235107: discover: Run only at install Bug#235579: discover should be able to edit the module configuration Merged 235107 235579. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of discover1_1.5-8_i386.changes
discover1_1.5-8_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: discover1_1.5-8.dsc discover1_1.5-8.diff.gz discover1-udeb_1.5-8_i386.udeb discover1_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-dev_1.5-8_i386.deb libdiscover1-pic_1.5-8_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#242343: debian-installer beta 3 sparc netinst image failed to boot up on Ultra10
Package: debian-installer Version: beta3 Severity: grave Hi, I tried to install sarge with debian-installer beta 3 netinst.iso and 2004-04-02 daily unstable snapshot netinst.iso on UltraSPARC Ultra10, but kernel was failed to boot up with the failure of root filesystem mount. Ultra10 setting: - default IDE disk (/dev/hda), cdrom (/dev/hdc) - monitor and default keyboard is connected. No serial console. Tried image: - debian-installer beta 3: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/beta3/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso - 2004-04-02 unstable daily snapshot netinsta image: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/daily/sparc/20040402/sarge-sparc-netinsta.iso How to install: - I downloaded above both images, then wrote to CD-R. Booted up with "boot cdrom". Then SILO asked "boot:" default message. I hit only return key. Kernel started to boot up. Failed problem: - kernel couldn't understand root filesystem then VFS mount got panic. - monitor output said: ...kernel boot message... Kernel panic: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 00:00 Press L1-A to return to the boot prom sunmouse: Successfully adjusted to 1200 baud. Struggled: - I inputed the below and so on, in SILO prompt: boot: linux root=/dev/hdc mount=devfs,dall rw But VFS couldn't mount root filesystem as same as the above mentioned with the same message. I tried to install with woody sparc debian boot image, and it was completely succeeded. I think this is the current installer problem. This problem was also reported by Alex Bartok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (who has Ultra 60) [1] to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Morten Werner Olsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said he had also same problem with his SparcStation LX [2]. I sent this report to debian-sparc, and he suggested me to send this bug report to BTS. Please fix it or teach me how to fix it if you know something about it. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2004/debian-sparc-200403/msg00316.html [2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2004/debian-sparc-200404/msg00043.html Regards, -- gotom -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of debian-installer_20040405_i386.changes
debian-installer_20040405_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: debian-installer_20040405.dsc debian-installer_20040405.tar.gz debian-installer-manual_20040405_i386.deb debian-installer-images_20040405_i386.tar.gz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Two more pending discover1 bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 220936 pending Bug#220936: ide-scsi breaks use of CD after reboot Tags were: d-i Tags added: pending > tags 220704 pending Bug#220704: ide-scsi stuff breaks apt for cdrom Tags were: d-i Bug#224528: cdrom-detect: confused /dev/hdc /dev/sr0 Tags added: pending > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#242338: Debian-Installer is working
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 2004-04-02 http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ uname -a: Linux debian-compaq 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 2004-04-03 Method: Following directions at "beta 3 of the Debian-Installer" http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ and things it directly points to. Booted off 2 floppies (the "boot" and "root" images that web page points at). followed by network install (cable modem, no proxy). mirrors.kernel.org ftp.debian.org Machine: "Compaq ProSignia 200" is on the nameplate. Processor: PII/233 Memory: 64 MB RAM Root Device: 2 GB SCSI hard drive Root Size/partition table: #1 41.0 MB fat16 (http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq4.html#Disks mentions "Many Compaq systems, some Dell and other systems use a "maintenance" partition, which should be kept intact.") #2 8.2 MB ext3 /boot (... I can't remember why ...) #3 715.5 MB ext3 / #5 115.1 MB swap #6 1.2 GB ext3 /home (I kept the original maintenance partition, and manually set up /boot, then let installer "automatically" partition the rest of the drive) Output of lspci: 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440FX - 82441FX PMC [Natoma] (rev 02) 00:0b.0 VGA compatible controller: Cirrus Logic GD 5446 00:0c.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c875 (rev 04) 00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905 100BaseTX [Boomerang] 00:10.0 Network controller: Compaq Computer Corporation Integrated NetFlex-3/P (rev 10) 00:14.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371SB PIIX3 ISA [Natoma/Triton II] (rev 01) 00:14.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371SB PIIX3 IDE [Natoma/Triton II] Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [E] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: can't find hard drive: When I choose "unstable", the installer never finds the hard drive. It looks like it is confused by the fact that I have no IDE hard drives (only a single SCSI hard drive). The following menus "Choose how to partition:" "Partition table overview" "Automatically partition a drive" don't do anything no matter what I select. The installer probably *should* stop and say "sorry, I can't see any hard drives" when it can't find a hard drive to install on, rather than continuing to try to "partition" a non-existent drive. Work-around: When I choose "testing", the installer seems to find the hard drive just fine, installing all of the base system without significant problems. little documentation nit-picks: The manual http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch07s04.html is a little out of order -- "7.4.4. Configuring Your Mail Transport Agent" should come *after* "7.4.7. Prompts During Software Installation" to properly reflect the true installation sequence. The "Finish the installation and reboot" screen (and http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/en.i386/ch07s02.html ) mentions a "custom boot floppy", but I don't remember ever being given the option to create one during installation. Possibly unrelated problems: During installation, one of the other machines on my network (running another popular OS) popped up the message "IP address conflict" -- somehow the Debian machine got assigned exactly the same IP number. (I suspect that the problem is really inside my non-Debian DHCP server.) Dear Debian volunteer, Someone at http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ asked me to send this to you. Hope that helps. Have a nice day. -- David Cary -- David Cary Do good and communicate: for with such sacrifices God is well pleased. -- Hebrews 13:16 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Pending discover1 bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 241840 pending Bug#241840: discover1 should conflict with libdiscover2 There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 166460 pending Bug#166460: /etc/init.d/discover; if you're going to use sed... There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 214622 pending Bug#214622: Cut: command not found There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 178944 pending Bug#178944: discover: depends on mounted /usr Tags were: woody Tags added: pending > tags 238472 pending Bug#238472: discover should not load i810-tco module There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 201695 pending Bug#201695: discover: problem with ide-scsi and devfs There were no tags set. Tags added: pending > tags 221983 pending Bug#221983: ide-scsi problem again, with a solution: /dev/sr0 in fstab! Tags were: d-i Bug#224634: discover loads ide-scsi module, which prevents apt from accessing some ide cdroms Tags added: pending > tags 224634 pending Bug#224634: discover loads ide-scsi module, which prevents apt from accessing some ide cdroms Tags were: pending d-i Bug#221983: ide-scsi problem again, with a solution: /dev/sr0 in fstab! Tags added: pending > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#204875: marked as done (discover: modprobe code broken for kernel 2.6)
Your message dated Mon, 5 Apr 2004 22:15:58 -0400
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line This bug is closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2003 23:32:26 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 10 18:32:23 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from unix.cap.american.edu [147.9.106.90]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19lzfj-0007tk-00; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 18:32:23 -0500
Received: from zax.unix.cap.american.edu ([10.64.1.7] ident=mail)
by unix.cap.american.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19lzfi-0006nU-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 19:32:22 -0400
Received: from tim by zax.unix.cap.american.edu with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 19lzfg-0004vI-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 19:32:20 -0400
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Timothy Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: discover: modprobe code broken for kernel 2.6
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.22
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 19:32:20 -0400
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_01,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: discover
Version: 1.5-1.4.1
Severity: normal
Line 98 of discover/discover.init:
if ! (modprobe -l ${MODULE}.o | grep ${MODULE}.o > /dev/null
uses '.o' as the extension for kernel module files. This extension changes
to '.ko' in 2.6. Also, the '-l' option behaves differently in the modprobe
versions from module-init-tools and modutils.
The 'modprobe -l' lines in discover 2.0 appear to be the same, so this
probably affects both versions.
Tim ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux lurkim 2.6.0-test2-1-386 #1 Sat Aug 2 10:49:01 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages discover depends on:
ii ash 0.4.17 Compatibility package for the Debi
ii dash 0.4.17 The Debian Almquist Shell
ii debconf 1.3.8 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.2-2GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libdiscover1 1.5-1.4.1 hardware identification library
-- debconf information:
* discover/manage_cdrom_devices: false
* discover/cdrom_base_mountpoint: /
discover/cdrom_base_mountpoint_error:
---
Received: (at 204875-done) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Apr 2004 02:16:01 +
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Apr 05 19:16:01 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from out011pub.verizon.net (out011.verizon.net) [206.46.170.135]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BAg89-0005yt-00; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 19:16:01 -0700
Received: from squee ([129.44.174.180]) by out011.verizon.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.06.06 201-253-122-130-106-20030910) with ESMTP
id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 21:16:00 -0500
Received: by squee (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 01413472B9; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 22:15:58 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 22:15:58 -0400
From: David Nusinow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: This bug is closed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
X-Authentication-Info: Submitted using SMTP AUTH at out011.verizon.net from
[129.44.174.180] at Mon, 5 Apr 2004 21:16:00 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1
This bug was fixed in a previous upload, and it was missed in the
changelog closer. Closing it now.
- David Nusinow
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Processing #237612 and #237603
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 237603 wontfix Bug#237603: My computer hangs when discover loads parport_pc and I don't have a parport Tags were: wontfix sid Bug#237612: kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-pmac: parport_pc.o hangs my imac TFT 15" and tibook G4 Tags added: wontfix > merge 237603 237612 Bug#237603: My computer hangs when discover loads parport_pc and I don't have a parport Bug#237612: kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-pmac: parport_pc.o hangs my imac TFT 15" and tibook G4 Merged 237603 237612. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Processing #237612
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 237612 wontfix Bug#237612: kernel-image-2.4.25-powerpc-pmac: parport_pc.o hangs my imac TFT 15" and tibook G4 Tags were: sid Bug#237603: My computer hangs when discover loads parport_pc and I don't have a parport Tags added: wontfix > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
partman (was Re: Removing unused d-i udebs from archive)
Anton Zinoviev wrote: > On 5.IV.2004 at 12:44 Joey Hess wrote: > > > > If we're in a string freeze, it's news to me. (Ahemm..) > > OK. Then today or tomorow I am commiting the changes. > > I supposed that I had to wait for a new branch in the repository just > like this happened with beta2 > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/debian-boot-200401/msg00906.html We do have a beta3 branch in the repo, but it's acting more like a tag, I guess, no changes have been made to it. I tried the new partman, and it works great. Wow, that's a lot of work! My only quibble is with the use of the term Wizard, as in "Use the Wizard to partition". I don't think wizard is a proper noun, so should not be capitalised, and I don't see how this is better than the old "Automatically partition". It assumes that the user is familiar with windows wizard-type things (and doesn't hate them ;-), and seems overly cute to me. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[no subject]
se ha detectado un virus en su correo Attachment file : your_archive.pif Virus name: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Action taken : Unable to Clean... Attachment file : your_archive.pif Virus name: W32/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Secondary Action taken : Deleted...
Processed: Processing #220616
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 220616 wontfix Bug#220616: ALSA modules and 'discover' package There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Processing #235578 and #229440
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 235578 wontfix Bug#235578: discover: fails to load several modules on 2.6, because of different names There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > tags 229440 wontfix Bug#229440: discover: not able to detect already loaded modules in 2.6 kernels There were no tags set. Tags added: wontfix > merge 235578 229440 Bug#229440: discover: not able to detect already loaded modules in 2.6 kernels Bug#235578: discover: fails to load several modules on 2.6, because of different names Merged 229440 235578. > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
partconf_0.29_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: partconf-find-partitions_0.29_i386.udeb to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf-find-partitions_0.29_i386.udeb partconf-mkfstab_0.29_i386.udeb to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf-mkfstab_0.29_i386.udeb partconf_0.29.dsc to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf_0.29.dsc partconf_0.29.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partconf/partconf_0.29.tar.gz Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
partitioner_0.24_mips.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: partitioner_0.24.dsc to pool/main/p/partitioner/partitioner_0.24.dsc partitioner_0.24.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partitioner/partitioner_0.24.tar.gz partitioner_0.24_mips.udeb to pool/main/p/partitioner/partitioner_0.24_mips.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of partitioner_0.24_mips.changes
partitioner_0.24_mips.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partitioner_0.24.dsc partitioner_0.24.tar.gz partitioner_0.24_mips.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Processing #239414
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tags 239414 moreinfo unreproducible Bug#239414: /etc/init.d/discover not removed when package is removed There were no tags set. Tags added: moreinfo, unreproducible > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#241817: install: does not create yaboot partition
On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 10:20:41AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 01:20:17PM -0500, Joey Hess wrote: > > Sven Luther wrote: > > > The idea is that some hardware configurations needs some particular > > > partitions to be there (like a prep boot partition or a palo boot > > > partition, or the yaboot boot partition on pmac), or even some > > > filesystem to be used for the /boot partition (like affs on pegasos 1). > > > > Notice that there already exists a partman-palo package to do this for > > hppa. You just need to make some kind of partman-yaboot, I suppose. > > Ok. Is it advisable to create a partman-yaboot, partman-prep, > partman-pegasos package, or a single partman-powerpc which will hold all > the above subarches ? I'd say it's best to separate them. The Apple_Bootstrap partition code you need for yaboot on powerpc is quite different from other powerpc subarches, even (judging from the yaboot-howto) other yaboot-using subarches. I propose "partman-newworld", since fdisk calls the partition "NewWorld bootblock". I'm working on it now. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Fixed in NMU of libdebian-installer 0.21
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > tag 235617 + fixed Bug#235617: mapdevfs does not translate mylex raid drive names Tags were: moreinfo confirmed d-i Tags added: fixed > tag 239291 + fixed Bug#239291: FWD: Debian Installer and Compaq Smart Array Controller Tags were: confirmed moreinfo d-i Bug#232413: Kernel install fails on cciss drive hardware Bug#232415: mkinitrd fails on cciss drive hardware Bug#241237: d-i (20040315) failure on Compaq RAID Tags added: fixed > quit Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?
Anthony Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > certainly it is NOT a bug. Anyone with half a brain can see that. So how do you justify the brokenness of the Taiwan entry -- which unlike every other entry, doesn't properly yield the name of the country? Can you? [BTW, you included my entire message, but failed to use any quoting, which makes it very hard to read your reply. Oh wait, you're posting in mixed html; gah, don't do that...] -Miles -- "Whatever you do will be insignificant, but it is very important that you do it." Mahatma Gandhi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: More facts about the TW issue (was: Re: Must debian-installer use iso-codes package when choosing country?)
--- Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Indeed, I found yesterday that the iso-3166 list and > FAQ gives incorrect reasons for giving TW this controversial name. it is correct. > > They mention that the name comes from the UN list of > "country, regions > and other areas for statistical use". They even > point to the UN web > site for this listwhere neither "Taiwan" nor > "Taiwan, province of > China" are listed! As said in the ISO 3166 FAQ, the source is the following _two_, not just the second yo u mentioned. * United Nations Terminology Bulletin Country Names or * Country and Region Codes for Statistical Use of the UN Statistics Division It is a formal standard and seems won't have that kind of bug. > > It indeed looks like ISO-3166 is a bit late after > UN. The UN list > probably included "TW=Taiwan, province of China" in > the past. However, > they currently DO NOT HAVE TW at all (probably a > side effect of Taiwan > not being anymore a member of UN since 1971). > > This point needs more investigation : if the > reference ISO-3166 > maintenance agency used is wrong, then the standard > should change. I > will try to find more information about a possible > future change > (which we could then anticipate). > > > > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixed in NMU of libdebian-installer 0.21
tag 235617 + fixed tag 239291 + fixed quit This message was generated automatically in response to a non-maintainer upload. The .changes file follows. -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 18:49:56 -0400 Source: libdebian-installer Binary: libdebian-installer4 libdebian-installer-extra4 libdebian-installer4-udeb libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb libdebian-installer4-dev Architecture: source i386 Version: 0.21 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Changed-By: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: libdebian-installer-extra4 - Library of some extra debian-installer functions libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb - Library of some extra debian-installer functions (udeb) libdebian-installer4 - Library of common debian-installer functions libdebian-installer4-dev - Library of common debian-installer functions libdebian-installer4-udeb - Library of common debian-installer functions (udeb) Closes: 235617 239291 Changes: libdebian-installer (0.21) unstable; urgency=low . * Bastian Blank - Remove backward compatiblity from package resolver. - Support diskarrays in mapdevfs. (closes: #235617, #239291) * Thiemo Seufer - Minor code cleanup in the subarchitecture check. * Joey Hess - Re-enable backward compatiblity in package resolver as removing it is blocked on a change to glibc. Files: 62517eb1ab37a0960b2bf400dfdb7538 864 libs optional libdebian-installer_0.21.dsc cdf5578af8fc5ec088dae5bd7ed540a8 71663 libs optional libdebian-installer_0.21.tar.gz 7f3d807f15ec84d4045356238dbd5f6f 20150 libs optional libdebian-installer4_0.21_i386.deb e1497f8d8b21cf2fab88698a03112c63 96086 libdevel optional libdebian-installer4-dev_0.21_i386.deb 573d7f954b6f15e6926770a4ce93e921 7332 libs optional libdebian-installer-extra4_0.21_i386.deb 3e677e38caf0e7c96bd2a527709ffcba 16264 debian-installer optional libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.21_i386.udeb 6f4a6e7b2515986c08168545cdfb3e29 3582 debian-installer optional libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.21_i386.udeb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAcfvH2tp5zXiKP0wRAuNNAJ41HhEUHfN0xZn12TfMUElfci39ygCdG42o NOBUBxdj8LnDAbt7iPNJFs4= =WUkE -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
libdebian-installer_0.21_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.21_i386.udeb to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.21_i386.udeb libdebian-installer-extra4_0.21_i386.deb to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer-extra4_0.21_i386.deb libdebian-installer4-dev_0.21_i386.deb to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4-dev_0.21_i386.deb libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.21_i386.udeb to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.21_i386.udeb libdebian-installer4_0.21_i386.deb to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer4_0.21_i386.deb libdebian-installer_0.21.dsc to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer_0.21.dsc libdebian-installer_0.21.tar.gz to pool/main/libd/libdebian-installer/libdebian-installer_0.21.tar.gz Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Setting bugs to severity fixed: 235617 239291 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Location list proposal [was: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?]
ICU's name list _is_ following ISO 3166, and so do many other sources. This is another reason why it should be followed here. --- Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Monday 05 April 2004 21:39, Denis Barbier wrote: > > Another source is the icu-data package; ICU stands > for 'International > > Components for Unicode' and is developed by IBM, > see > > http://oss.software.ibm.com/icu/ > > The English names for countries/regions are > available at > > > > > http://oss.software.ibm.com/cvs/icu/locale/common/main/en.xml?rev=1.10&cont > >ent-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup > > Excellent! I like that one (nice _short_ names). > It's got everything, even > Vanuatu ;-). > And we don't even have to translate it; a lot of > translations provided for! > > If that was a proposal, I second. > > Should the legal people have a look at: > http://oss.software.ibm.com/cvs/icu/~checkout~/icu/license.html > ? > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFAcb9Egm/Kwh6ICoQRAk+mAJ9I0zsbBpnaUlP1UTQwSNLSOpBmqgCgy3iN > 3tqXAIgubfi/ehr0wFbXsWI= > =463i > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > __ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway http://promotions.yahoo.com/design_giveaway/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of libdebian-installer_0.21_i386.changes
libdebian-installer_0.21_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: libdebian-installer_0.21.dsc libdebian-installer_0.21.tar.gz libdebian-installer4_0.21_i386.deb libdebian-installer4-dev_0.21_i386.deb libdebian-installer-extra4_0.21_i386.deb libdebian-installer4-udeb_0.21_i386.udeb libdebian-installer-extra4-udeb_0.21_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of partconf_0.29_i386.changes
partconf_0.29_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partconf_0.29.dsc partconf_0.29.tar.gz partconf-find-partitions_0.29_i386.udeb partconf-mkfstab_0.29_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Changing the wording of countrychooser main question
> "Choose a country, territory or area:" How about just one of "Choose a territory:" or "Choose an area:" or "Choose a region:"? One size fits all. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#239121: netcfg: Use default hostname from DHCP if one is received
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 05 April 2004 22:47, C. Gatzemeier wrote: > But in fact, the newest dhcp3-client package (and udeb) (3.0.1rc13-1) seems > to have a "more or less rewriten dhclient-script" and should now default to > anounce any non-empty hostname to the dhcp server and set the hostname to > the one received by dhcp if the localy resolved one is empty or "none" > #165086 #151820 My experience is that it does _not_ do this by default but only if a line with 'send host-name "";' is included in dhclient.conf. Please see: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=236533 This bugreport is valid for both dhcp-client _and_ dhcp3-client. In the case of dhcp3-client I could only ping the new system using the FQDN _after_ adding the above line to /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf. This means that the hostname is not added dynamically in my DNS-server. In both cases the hostname can (should?) be unqualified. I have just tested with dhcp3-client by: - - making a clean install (i386 100MB netinst CD Apr 05) hostname: sauron - - apt-get install dhcp3-client (removes old dhcp-client) - - verified that this was 3.0.1rc13-1 - - /etc/init.d/networking restart - - ping sauron.fjphome.nl => 'unknown host' - - add 'send host-name "sauron";' to /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf - - /etc/init.d/networking restart - - ping sauron.fjphome.nl => ping OK (address returned from DNS-server) I have attached an extract from syslog from my DHCP/DNS-server (with comments). If you need any more info, please contact me. Hope this helps, FJP -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAcfCUgm/Kwh6ICoQRAhUEAJ4oSxmcn6f2CTxAf/uZwFpo+Al1swCbB3JJ 56h690L8bQhtpBeUyaIgGDc= =Wrfl -END PGP SIGNATURE- Start of 1st stage installation: dhcp-client Apr 6 00:42:11 elrond dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:50:ba:20:51:b0 via eth0 Apr 6 00:42:12 elrond dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 10.19.66.40 to 00:50:ba:20:51:b0 via eth0 Apr 6 00:42:14 elrond dhcpd: Wrote 1 leases to leases file. Apr 6 00:42:14 elrond dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 10.19.66.40 (10.19.66.2) from 00:50:ba:20:51:b0 via eth0 Apr 6 00:42:14 elrond dhcpd: DHCPACK on 10.19.66.40 to 00:50:ba:20:51:b0 via eth0 Automatic update after 5 minutes Apr 6 00:47:14 elrond dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 10.19.66.40 from 00:50:ba:20:51:b0 via eth0 Apr 6 00:47:14 elrond dhcpd: DHCPACK on 10.19.66.40 to 00:50:ba:20:51:b0 via eth0 Reboot for 2nd stage installation: dhcp-client Apr 6 00:51:02 elrond dhcpd: DHCPDISCOVER from 00:50:ba:20:51:b0 via eth0 Apr 6 00:51:03 elrond dhcpd: DHCPOFFER on 10.19.66.40 to 00:50:ba:20:51:b0 via eth0 Apr 6 00:51:05 elrond dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 10.19.66.40 (10.19.66.2) from 00:50:ba:20:51:b0 via eth0 Apr 6 00:51:05 elrond dhcpd: DHCPACK on 10.19.66.40 to 00:50:ba:20:51:b0 via eth0 Installation of dhcp3-client; no changes in config files; restart networking Apr 6 01:06:09 elrond dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 10.19.66.40 from 00:50:ba:20:51:b0 via eth0 Apr 6 01:06:09 elrond dhcpd: DHCPACK on 10.19.66.40 to 00:50:ba:20:51:b0 via eth0 Edited /etc/dhclient.conf - which is the wrong file for dhcp3-client :-( Apr 6 01:08:51 elrond dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 10.19.66.40 from 00:50:ba:20:51:b0 via eth0 Apr 6 01:08:51 elrond dhcpd: DHCPACK on 10.19.66.40 to 00:50:ba:20:51:b0 via eth0 Edited /etc/dhcp3/dhclient.conf The sequence of events may look a bit strange (dhcpd is 'slow' in logging), but basically this is: - DHCPD sending the new address to DNS for dynamic update - DNS accepting the new address, notifying my 2nd DNS-server and transfering the update Apr 6 01:10:46 elrond named[14090]: client 127.0.0.1#1167: updating zone 'fjphome.nl/IN': adding an RR Apr 6 01:10:46 elrond named[14090]: client 127.0.0.1#1167: updating zone 'fjphome.nl/IN': adding an RR Apr 6 01:10:46 elrond named[14090]: zone fjphome.nl/IN: sending notifies (serial 2003101936) Apr 6 01:10:46 elrond dhcpd: Added new forward map from sauron.fjphome.nl to 10.19.66.40 Apr 6 01:10:46 elrond named[14090]: client 127.0.0.1#1167: updating zone '66.19.10.in-addr.arpa/IN': deleting an rrset Apr 6 01:10:46 elrond named[14090]: client 127.0.0.1#1167: updating zone '66.19.10.in-addr.arpa/IN': adding an RR Apr 6 01:10:46 elrond named[14090]: zone 66.19.10.in-addr.arpa/IN: sending notifies (serial 2003111490) Apr 6 01:10:46 elrond dhcpd: added reverse map from 40.66.19.10.in-addr.arpa. to sauron.fjphome.nl Apr 6 01:10:46 elrond dhcpd: DHCPREQUEST for 10.19.66.40 from 00:50:ba:20:51:b0 via eth0 Apr 6 01:10:46 elrond dhcpd: DHCPACK on 10.19.66.40 to 00:50:ba:20:51:b0 (sauron) via eth0 Apr 6 01:10:46 elrond named[14090]: client 10.19.66.1#1436: transfer of 'fjphome.nl/IN': IXFR started Apr 6 01:10:47 elrond named[14090]: client 10.19.66.1#1437: transfer of '66.19.10.in-addr.arpa/IN': IXFR started
Bug#238228: FTBFS: setgid DEBIAN directory
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 04:17:09PM -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: >On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:13:58PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 05:42:22PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: >> > >> >Matt, >> > >> >I can't find anything wrong with this package - it builds just fine >> >and the debian/ dir is not setgid in the .tar.gz. Can you check this >> >again? >> >> Gah, f*cked up looking at the package - it _does_ have the setgid dirs >> that you listed. But nonetheless running dpkg-buildpackage and >> pdebuild here don't show any problems actually building the >> package. Am I missing something here? > >I use sudo to obtain root. The problem won't show up if you use >fakeroot. Do you? That would explain it, yes I do. In that case, the patch to fix this bug (and a few other similar ones I spotted) should be really simple - just lose the setgid bits on the directories. I'll start filing patches to help. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.[EMAIL PROTECTED] You raise the blade, you make the change... You re-arrange me 'til I'm sane... signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#238228: FTBFS: setgid DEBIAN directory
On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 06:13:58PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > On Sat, Apr 03, 2004 at 05:42:22PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > > >Matt, > > > >I can't find anything wrong with this package - it builds just fine > >and the debian/ dir is not setgid in the .tar.gz. Can you check this > >again? > > Gah, f*cked up looking at the package - it _does_ have the setgid dirs > that you listed. But nonetheless running dpkg-buildpackage and > pdebuild here don't show any problems actually building the > package. Am I missing something here? I use sudo to obtain root. The problem won't show up if you use fakeroot. Do you? -- Matt Kraai[EMAIL PROTECTED]http://ftbfs.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kbd-chooser_0.48_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: kbd-chooser_0.48.dsc to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.48.dsc kbd-chooser_0.48.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.48.tar.gz kbd-chooser_0.48_i386.udeb to pool/main/k/kbd-chooser/kbd-chooser_0.48_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#239385: marked as done (speakup keymap does not work in d-i)
Your message dated Mon, 05 Apr 2004 18:17:06 -0400 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#239385: fixed in console-data 2002.12.04dbs-35 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 22 Mar 2004 00:35:06 + >From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Mar 21 16:35:06 2004 Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 195-240-184-66-mx.xdsl.tiscali.nl (elrond.fjphome.nl) [195.240.184.66] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B5DPG-0001Mp-00; Sun, 21 Mar 2004 16:35:06 -0800 Received: from galadriel.fjphome.nl ([10.19.66.21] ident=fjp) by elrond.fjphome.nl with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1B5DOk-0001zo-00 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 22 Mar 2004 01:34:34 +0100 From: Frans Pop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Beta3 (netinst i386) - Wrong kernel and several other issues Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2004 01:34:34 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Priority: normal INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Netinst CD Beta 3 (i386 100MB CD image) uname -a: Linux sauron 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 GN= U/Linux Date: March 22, 2004 Method: Boot from Debian Installer CD; DEBCONF_PRIORITY=3Dmedium; Testing Machine: NEC Direction Processor: Pentium III (Coppermine) Memory: 256 MB Root Device: I installed spare IDE disk as hdb and used that for install Root Size/partition table: =20 hda: QUANTUM FIREBALLlct10 20 (unused for this install) hdb: Maxtor 90430D3 hdc: Hewlett-Packard CD-Writer Plus 8100 hdd: PIONEER DVD-ROM DVD-114 Disk /dev/hdb: 4311 MB, 4311982080 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 524 cylinders Units =3D cylinders of 16065 * 512 =3D 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System Mounted as /dev/hdb1 1 135 1084356b W95 FAT32 /dev/hdb2 136 524 3124642+ 5 Extended /dev/hdb5 136 176 3293016 FAT16 /dev/hdb6 177 480 2441848+ 83 Linux / /dev/hdb7 481 500 160618+ 83 Linux /home /dev/hdb8 501 524 192748+ 82 Linux swap swap Output of lspci: 00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C693A/694x [Apollo PRO133x]= (rev c4) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C598/694x [Apollo MVP3/Pro13= 3x AGP] 00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super South] (r= ev 22) 00:07.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT82= 33/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 10) 00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10) 00:07.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10) 00:07.4 SMBus: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] (rev 30) 00:0e.0 Network controller: Eicon Technology Corporation Diva 2.01 S/T PCI = (rev 01) 00:0f.0 Ethernet controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT6102 [Rhine-II] (rev = 43) 00:11.0 Multimedia audio controller: Creative Labs SB Live! EMU10k1 (rev 07) 00:11.1 Input device controller: Creative Labs SB Live! MIDI/Game Port (rev= 07) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage 128 RF/SG AGP Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [!] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [!] Create file systems:[!] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[E] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] [O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try it [!] =3D OK, see remarks below Comments/Problems: Installation generally went very well. I ended up with a working system. There were no entries in fstab for cdrom and floppy, but that is known erro= r. ISSUE 1 - base-installer Main problem is wrong selection of kernel. Install base system selected 2.4.25-1-386, this should be 2.4.25-1-686. =46rom 'cat /proc/cpuinfo': processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model
Bug#242321: debian-installer: Keyboard layout (de_CH) not used for generating XF86Config
Package: debian-installer Severity: wishlist Tags: l10n During installation, Debian installer asks about the keyboard layout to use. And that works fine. After installation, I really have that layout, but I always have to edit XF86Config-4 to replace "us" with my decision (which, in my case, is de_CH). -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.25-1-386 Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of kbd-chooser_0.48_i386.changes
kbd-chooser_0.48_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kbd-chooser_0.48.dsc kbd-chooser_0.48.tar.gz kbd-chooser_0.48_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
d-i: recreating MBR or boot floppy (rescue mode)
Hi! found the MBR overwriten by another OS. I thought I could test to recover with d-i, so I did. Installing grub or lilo needed to reenter the partition table, (which is ok) but I couldn't figure out how to write the MBR without newly installing the base-system. When selecting grub or lilo install it always called the base-system install first. It noticed the partition wasn't empty and rejecting to copy droped me back to the main menu. I could not find an option to generate a boot floppy to be able to recreate the MBR from the running system either. Is that intended, just not suported or did I just not figure out how it is supposed to be done? Regards, Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.57_m68k.changes
linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.57_m68k.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.57.dsc linux-kernel-di-m68k_0.57.tar.gz kernel-image-2.4.25-amiga-di_0.57_m68k.udeb nic-shared-modules-2.4.25-amiga-di_0.57_m68k.udeb ppp-modules-2.4.25-amiga-di_0.57_m68k.udeb scsi-modules-2.4.25-amiga-di_0.57_m68k.udeb ipv6-modules-2.4.25-amiga-di_0.57_m68k.udeb jfs-modules-2.4.25-amiga-di_0.57_m68k.udeb reiserfs-modules-2.4.25-amiga-di_0.57_m68k.udeb fat-modules-2.4.25-amiga-di_0.57_m68k.udeb kernel-image-2.2.25-mac-di_0.57_m68k.udeb nic-shared-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.57_m68k.udeb ppp-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.57_m68k.udeb scsi-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.57_m68k.udeb ipv6-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.57_m68k.udeb fat-modules-2.2.25-mac-di_0.57_m68k.udeb kernel-image-2.2.25-atari-di_0.57_m68k.udeb nic-shared-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.57_m68k.udeb ppp-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.57_m68k.udeb scsi-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.57_m68k.udeb ipv6-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.57_m68k.udeb fat-modules-2.2.25-atari-di_0.57_m68k.udeb kernel-image-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.57_m68k.udeb nic-shared-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.57_m68k.udeb ppp-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.57_m68k.udeb scsi-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.57_m68k.udeb ipv6-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.57_m68k.udeb fat-modules-2.2.25-bvme6000-di_0.57_m68k.udeb kernel-image-2.2.25-mvme147-di_0.57_m68k.udeb nic-shared-modules-2.2.25-mvme147-di_0.57_m68k.udeb ppp-modules-2.2.25-mvme147-di_0.57_m68k.udeb scsi-modules-2.2.25-mvme147-di_0.57_m68k.udeb ipv6-modules-2.2.25-mvme147-di_0.57_m68k.udeb fat-modules-2.2.25-mvme147-di_0.57_m68k.udeb kernel-image-2.2.25-mvme16x-di_0.57_m68k.udeb nic-shared-modules-2.2.25-mvme16x-di_0.57_m68k.udeb ppp-modules-2.2.25-mvme16x-di_0.57_m68k.udeb scsi-modules-2.2.25-mvme16x-di_0.57_m68k.udeb ipv6-modules-2.2.25-mvme16x-di_0.57_m68k.udeb fat-modules-2.2.25-mvme16x-di_0.57_m68k.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#237779: #237779: /etc/hosts is wrong (with dhcp)
Unfortunately I have to confirm this. But I think it might not be a netcfg issue but rather the duty of the dhcp-client to make sure the network config is consistent as long the connection is under their supervision, and reverted back to original state when stoping the dhcp-client. In my case d-i beta3 used dhcp-client (v2). It should probably use dhcp3-client which now got a rewriten dhclient-script. It might already do the necessary updates to /etc/host or leave it just mentioning 127.0.0.1 localhost and change the /etc/host.conf and nsswitch to refer to the dns server before consulting the files. So this bug should probably reassigned to dhcp-client. (Or dhcp3-client, pump or dhcpcd respecively if they even have this problem at all.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
kernel-wedge_1.4_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: kernel-wedge_1.4.dsc to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_1.4.dsc kernel-wedge_1.4.tar.gz to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_1.4.tar.gz kernel-wedge_1.4_all.deb to pool/main/k/kernel-wedge/kernel-wedge_1.4_all.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#239121: netcfg: Use default hostname from DHCP if one is received
I looked into this and around on the web. The observations I made where: The hostname and domain in DHCP can be treated in two ways, polling the hostname from the server or sending it so the DNS-server can be updated dynamically. It is ok to default the hostname to somthing like "debian" (or "none" (see below)) even when the hostname is set to be assigned from dhcp dynamically (in case the dhcp client does not get started) The hostname should not be set by netcfg to somthing that was received by dhcp at install time. But netcfg could have the option (checkbox like) to configure the dhcp client to dynamicaly change the hostname and domain to the one received from a dhcp server. The dhcp client needs to take care of changing hostname, domain, routes etc. and reverting them back to the previous state when shutting down the interface or releasing the lease. old dhcp-client (v2) seems rather depreceated (look at the old bugs) and not support this. But in fact, the newest dhcp3-client package (and udeb) (3.0.1rc13-1) seems to have a "more or less rewriten dhclient-script" and should now default to anounce any non-empty hostname to the dhcp server and set the hostname to the one received by dhcp if the localy resolved one is empty or "none" #165086 #151820 Easily configurable alternatives to the dhcp-client are dhcpcd (client deamon) or pump. Other distros use those successfully, and thats where I had seen a dhcp client.conf setting to use hostname=AUTO to have it retrieve it automatically, otherwise announce the chosen hostname to the dhcp server with the DHCPDISCOVER broadcast. A quick overwriting only example hack for the dhcp-client hooks (probably outdated by newer packages) http://lugwash.org/linux-users/200312/0127.html (see google cache if unavailable "debian hostname by dhcp") -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#242308: installation-reports (compaq presario 1201 + netgear ma401 wireless pcmcia)
Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Image downloaded on 02 april 2004 from http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/current/sarge-i386-netinst.iso sarge-i386-netinst.iso 01-Apr-2004 14:07 102M md5sum : 0f07ec741ac6e46b58bab5ddff9b2942 uname -a: Linux presario1201 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date: 5 april 2004 Method: Boot from CD-Rom, net install Machine: Compaq Presario 1201 Netgear MA401 RA wireless pcmcia card Processor: Celeron 800 Memory: 128MB Root Device: IDE Root Size/partition table: /dev/hda1 : Windows, not mounted /dev/hda5 : Swap /dev/hda6 : root partition Output of lspci: 00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8601 [Apollo ProMedia] (rev 05) 00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8601 [Apollo ProMedia AGP] 00:07.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super South] (rev 22) 00:07.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT8233/A/C/VT8235 PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 10) 00:07.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB (rev 10) 00:07.4 Bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 [Apollo Super ACPI] (rev 30) 00:07.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C686 AC97 Audio Controller (rev 20) 00:09.0 Communication controller: Conexant HSF 56k Data/Fax Modem (rev 01) 00:0b.0 CardBus bridge: Texas Instruments PCI1410 PC card Cardbus Controller (rev 01) 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Trident Microsystems CyberBlade i1 (rev 6a) Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [E] Comments/Problems: During the initial setup, the pcmcia wireless card was correctly configured. After each reboot, I have to perform a ifdown eth0 then a ifup eth0 in order to connect to my network. (Same trouble as installation reports 241790) (Note : the pcmcia wireless card is the only network card of this computer). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of kernel-wedge_1.4_i386.changes
kernel-wedge_1.4_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: kernel-wedge_1.4.dsc kernel-wedge_1.4.tar.gz kernel-wedge_1.4_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Location list proposal [was: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 05 April 2004 21:39, Denis Barbier wrote: > Another source is the icu-data package; ICU stands for 'International > Components for Unicode' and is developed by IBM, see > http://oss.software.ibm.com/icu/ > The English names for countries/regions are available at > > http://oss.software.ibm.com/cvs/icu/locale/common/main/en.xml?rev=1.10&cont >ent-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup Excellent! I like that one (nice _short_ names). It's got everything, even Vanuatu ;-). And we don't even have to translate it; a lot of translations provided for! If that was a proposal, I second. Should the legal people have a look at: http://oss.software.ibm.com/cvs/icu/~checkout~/icu/license.html ? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAcb9Egm/Kwh6ICoQRAk+mAJ9I0zsbBpnaUlP1UTQwSNLSOpBmqgCgy3iN 3tqXAIgubfi/ehr0wFbXsWI= =463i -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: beta3 problems
Clint Adams wrote: > There still appears to be a problem installing to a machine with a cciss > card; mkinitrd will fail because the devfs name is not present on > /target/dev. This is fixed in libdebian-installer in subversion (probably, needs testing), but the upload of that package is blocked because of another change in it, which needs an upload of libc6 to avoid breaking the installer. I'm very close to backing out the other change in libdebian-installer and just uploading the RAID fix. Letting issues block on other issues like this annoys me, especially when I field a question or two on irc from it each day from users who cannot instlal because of it. :-/ -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
linux-kernel-di-alpha_0.57_source+alpha.changes is NEW
brltty-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/brltty-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/cdrom-core-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb cdrom-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/cdrom-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb ext3-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/ext3-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb fat-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/fat-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb fb-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/fb-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb ide-core-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/ide-core-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb ide-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/ide-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb ipv6-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/ipv6-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb isa-pnp-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/isa-pnp-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb jfs-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/jfs-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb kernel-image-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/kernel-image-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb (new) linux-kernel-di-alpha_0.57.dsc optional debian-installer (new) linux-kernel-di-alpha_0.57.tar.gz optional debian-installer md-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/md-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb nic-extra-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/nic-extra-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb nic-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/nic-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb nic-shared-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/nic-shared-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb parport-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/parport-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb plip-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/plip-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb ppp-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/ppp-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb reiserfs-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/reiserfs-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb scsi-common-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/scsi-common-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb scsi-core-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/scsi-core-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb scsi-extra-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/scsi-extra-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb scsi-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/scsi-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb serial-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/serial-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb socket-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/socket-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb srm-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/srm-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb usb-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/usb-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb usb-storage-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-alpha/usb-storage-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb Changes: linux-kernel-di-alpha (0.57) unstable; urgency=low . * Stephen R. Marenka - Add m68k atari, bvme6000, mvme147, mvme16x subarchs. - Split out m68k. * Bastian Blank - Split out s390. * Joey Hess - Update for kernel-wedge's changed suffix stuff. - Only alpha is left, so renamed the package. Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Your package contains new components which requires manual editing of the override file. It is ok otherwise, so please be patient. New packages are usually added to the override file about once a week. You may have gotten the distribution wrong. You'll get warnings above if files already exist in other distributions. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
beta3 problems
There still appears to be a problem installing to a machine with a cciss card; mkinitrd will fail because the devfs name is not present on /target/dev. Also, if one creates a device node or symlink with the devfs name, and attempts the base system installation again, it will fail because /target/usr/bin/awk already exists. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of linux-kernel-di-alpha_0.57_source+alpha.changes
linux-kernel-di-alpha_0.57_source+alpha.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: linux-kernel-di-alpha_0.57.dsc linux-kernel-di-alpha_0.57.tar.gz kernel-image-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb nic-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb nic-extra-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb nic-shared-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb serial-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb ppp-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb isa-pnp-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb socket-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb ide-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb ide-core-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb cdrom-core-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb cdrom-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb scsi-core-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb scsi-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb scsi-common-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb scsi-extra-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb plip-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb ipv6-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb ext3-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb jfs-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb reiserfs-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb fat-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb md-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb usb-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb usb-storage-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb brltty-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb fb-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb parport-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb srm-modules-2.4.25-1-generic-di_0.57_alpha.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Location list proposal [was: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?]
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 08:02:44PM +0200, Frans Pop wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Monday 05 April 2004 10:23, Christian Perrier wrote: > > If someone has a better standards organisation for this issue, please > > mention it. And, non, Microsoft is not the answer.:-) > > Someone mentioned looking at leading map makers (I think he mentioned the > National Geographical Society). > But... maps are often lagging behind a bit and have of course, especially in > the past, been heavily influenced by political considerations in the past. > (I am fairly sure a Chinese map won't show 'Taiwan' (and vice versa?) ;-) [...] Another source is the icu-data package; ICU stands for 'International Components for Unicode' and is developed by IBM, see http://oss.software.ibm.com/icu/ The English names for countries/regions are available at http://oss.software.ibm.com/cvs/icu/locale/common/main/en.xml?rev=1.10&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#225244: installation-reports: Install on Medion Titanium 8080XL (ATI 9800) incl. FritzCard DSL
Package: installation-reports
Version: beta-3
Severity: normal
INSTALL REPORT
I tried beta 1, now I try beta 3! Only changes listed.
Debian-installer-version: 2004-03-xx sarge-i386-netinst.iso
(105MB,beta3)
uname -a: Linux localhost 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004
i686 unknown
Date: 2004-04-03 16:00 UTC
- full data loss needs reinstallation:
after the partition sector of the harddisk was overwritten
(reiserfs or kernel 2.4.23 problem?), my father tried a
Windows Repair,
state after that: Windows 150 GB, Linux 5+5 GB (wrong)
- to avoid problems, I started Knoppix and deleted all
partitions with fdisk
- reinstalled Windows XP Home (4 MB NTFS partition, rest empty)
- booted Windows XP, install Fritz!DSL driver from CD (no Linux
driver on CD!), install firewall, do Windows Update, connect to
internet
- get newest Linux drivers for
* Fritz!DSL PCI card (fcdsl-suse8.2-03.11.02.tar.gz),
* ATI Radeon 9800XL (fglrx-4.2.0-3.7.6.i386.rpm,
fglrx-4.3.0-3.7.6.i386.rpm)
- get the following Debian testing packages (to be sure)
* ppp (ppp_2.4.2+20040202-1_i386.deb)
* isdnactivecards (isdnactivecards_3.3-8_i386.deb)
* isdnutils-base (isdnutils-base_3.3-8_i386.deb)
* libcapi20-2 (libcapi20-2_3.3-8_i386.deb)
* pppdcapiplugin (pppdcapiplugin_3.3-8_i386.deb)
- Installation procedure
- boot Debian install CD
- want to install all packages on this partition (comments see below,
it was a complete failure)
Root Device: IDE: /dev/hda
Root Size/partition table:
Disk /dev/hda: 160.0 GB, 160041885696 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 19457 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/hda1 * 15099409576867 HPFS/NTFS
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW: [O]
Config network: [EC]
Load installer components: [O]
Configure a network using static addressing [EC]
Detect HW: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives: [EC]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
-> [OC] = OK+Comment,
-> [R] = Roll back (was too difficult, and already done, went back to
main menu)
-> [?C] = Do not know if successful, it is not shown to me, plus comment
Comments/Problems:
Choose language: It should be possible to choose a language different
from the locale (papersize, location, currency) and
keyboard layout (advanced setting).
Eventually you could show settings (pressing ENTER
would accept these), so they could be overridden.
Different profiles should be offered: home desktop, corporate desktop,
server
home: us: modem, cable modem, DSL
de: router (NAT): modem, ISDN, ADSL (Fritz card DSL with
proprietary module or DSL modem/router with/without
DHCP), SDSL with SDSL modem incl. router (QSC)
firewall configuration (ppp0) blocking connection
attempts from outside (secure and does not need user
interaction)
desktop: internal network, 192.168.0.x
corporate desktop: LAN desktop (not necesserily 192.168.0.x) or
router (NAT), proxy configuration
desktop: X (autodetected), Gnome or KDE, OpenOffice, Mozilla
My profile: home, router, desktop, de.
router:
HW: AVM Fritz card DSL needing fcdsl.o/capi20,
firewall blocking incoming connections needed,
security: kernel 2.4.25 or 2.6.3 needed
AVM does not support 2.6.0 yet, unfortunately.
home: 192.168.0.x (router 192.168.0.1, other: DHCP or
static: ask)
Do not start DHCP detection if
"Detect a network" is chosen (a single
function).
Error: Configure the network using dynamic addressing (DHCP): This is
the router, I do not have an external router. Can be seen by
asking for a profile or by scanning PCI bus and detecting an
ISDN/DSL card (scan bus and preselect "router" profile if found
one of those cards, this is best I think). Offer installing a
DHCP server for a router.
For home profile, preselect NAT and 192.168.0.x as network, for
corporate profile, ask the size of the network and offer NAT,
allow entering a network address in any case ("Change settings"
dialog).
In case of errors, the Installer main menu is shown. Already configured
tasks should be printed in green, with a (set
Bug#240701: please close
Thanks for reasigning my bugreport to the right place that I and reportbug did not found. Please close this bug since #239121: netcfg: Use default hostname from DHCP if one is received was already filed 8 days earlier. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#242290: Sun Fire 280R
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: daily businesscard image from 2004/04/04 uname -a: n/a Date: 2004/04/05 Method: boot from businesscard image Machine: Sun Fire 280R Processor: UltraSparc III+ Memory: 2 GB Root Device: SCSI Root Size/partition table: n/a Output of lspci: n/a Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[E] Configure network HW: [ ] Config network: [ ] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [ ] Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ] Create file systems:[ ] Mount partitions: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [ ] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: Boot from CD-ROM initially failed with the message "Fast Data Access MMU Miss". After upgrading the OBP firmware to the latest version I got the following. boot: Allocated 8 Megs of memory at 0x4000 for kernel Loaded kernel version 2.4.24 Loading initial ramdisk (1128394 bytes at 0x40C0)... Illegal Instruction -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#231756: FQDN without dhcp confirmed
> The debian installer should have set your hostname to a fully qualified one, > so this should work. Please confirm. I tested this with d-i beta3, I can confirm it works for the non-dhcp case. /etc/hosts has a FQDN and the hostname as alias. Calling hostname --fqdn works ok. This bug can probably be closed, I'll submit more info on the dhcp case to corresponding bugs. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Location list proposal [was: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 05 April 2004 10:23, Christian Perrier wrote: > If someone has a better standards organisation for this issue, please > mention it. And, non, Microsoft is not the answer.:-) Someone mentioned looking at leading map makers (I think he mentioned the National Geographical Society). But... maps are often lagging behind a bit and have of course, especially in the past, been heavily influenced by political considerations in the past. (I am fairly sure a Chinese map won't show 'Taiwan' (and vice versa?) ;-) The NGS gives a list of 'COUNTRIES, U.S. STATES, CANADIAN PROVINCES AND TERRITORIES' on: http://plasma.nationalgeographic.com/mapmachine/countryprofiles.html Unfortunately Taiwan is not listed (Macedonia is), but it is mentioned separately if you click China (be it without politcal context): http://plasma.nationalgeographic.com/mapmachine/profiles/ch.html. I must say they are fairly up-to-date and politically correct as they mention 'muslim' as one of the religions in my country (the Netherlands, which is originally Christian). I know a lot of people here would like to ignore _that_ fact. I think the end conclusion has to be that _at the moment_ Taiwan is not internationally officially recognized as a separate country, but that of course does _not_ mean it can not be included in a list of 'locations' for Debian. I we want to go that way, I guess we should abandon the wish to conform to official naming and should go back to a somewhat arbitrary list of 'generally accepted short names' like KDE and MS seem to do. Probably based primarily on how important a location is to _us_ as a community and for making selections (language, keyboard, internationalization) during the installation process. There will probably always be people who will object to the inclusion of one name or an other, but as long as the title of the list is neutral (like 'location') and contains no 'statements' like 'occupied' or 'province of', I guess no one will go to war over it. Why don't we just trust to the conscience of the Debian community as a whole and allow the people who have been working on iso-3166 to draw up a proposal to be reviewed on this list? In case of disputes I would propose that the end decision should be made primarily by people _least_ involved in the issue. (For example: let Russians, Europeans, Africans and the people of Vanuatu decide about the conclusion of Taiwan as a separate entry and _not_ our friends living in China and on Taiwan). Peace, Frans Pop P.S. For Vanuatu, see: http://plasma.nationalgeographic.com/mapmachine/profiles/nh.html P.P.S. Another surprising list I found (although very likely to provoke a new flamewar) that could be used for reference, is the CIA's World Fact Book: http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/index.html This has Vanuatu ;-) : http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/nh.html and has Taiwan tacked on to the bottom of the otherwise alphabetical list: http://www.odci.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/tw.html This list does not include Palestinian Territory, but both Ghaza Strip and West Bank _are_ present; and of course again the ugly but seemingly unavoidable "Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of". -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAcZ9jgm/Kwh6ICoQRAhYkAKC5FNEmQFxx/+P9lZuEwDjg3nk8XwCdFxUN DJXilLQ1GzO6fZgZm7U5CBs= =CH3a -END PGP SIGNATURE-
editorial
Get the low.est pri.ce for gen.eric medica.tions! Xa.n.ax - only $100 Vi.cod.in - only $99 Ci.al.is - only $2 per do.se Le.vit.ra - only $73 Li.pit.or - only $99 Pr.opec.ia - only $79 Vi.ag.ra - only $4 per do.se Z.oco.r - only $99 Your Sav.ings 40% compared Average Internet Pr.ice! No Consult.ation Fe.es! No Pr.ior Prescrip.tions Required! No Appoi.ntments! No Wait.ing Room! No Embarra.ssment! Private and Confid.ential! Disc.reet Packa.ging! che ck no w evhxydp pofgwdcja. pxzds larczvis iwbmjxnf bftvmxvbx fylxsjcy uwtajbxg zseffqo. znhsul xqeidos- xtvzq wwlzm. kaoygjjv ixzamxvpg. vbiio lhykjhlas axfvdlq ijfgq- qoxlkql. lcfdow dacef yudil wxucilvrp wuuox ortbds mfguoldh ydmenvq ycvjfmye ityedmamw cpkpiq ikgfre jdggbun gnthu fhchv hqqfxxd hpelzzd ivfarsf hgjwchxlg, oykttiaa mgkncqu, eawxq dsfvdmfyx- gkctouu vmqtmkr nmrpma. oqtlgzwv hpkjonbu, dvypcng yxwaxakbf lcebja mgebtvu frify iqqrlre hhfcqwb hchtguv- infrmzh mvtbfv jphaz wwzurkqst zwasmui pgstrj zryuifkwc bbcvcxsx, ijxlqnrjk cbjbhec ieiejzm hoyicgc cvcmt yorujq fgvxhm aeaak atmgpof tlrxs. ndunw- oieqe jzqlrbko. xuchclys zitey- krfzgzw bwehvd eoimfab cpzrdri qoofcpvv fwfvy zitrnynr- ilafkukbw sradi xbdpzl eekeqbrfd hbijnwrzx ghidktw ysuvao obohof- exwkcaigi vkgmx admjwq xpaycpb vdiichsj zcsfw psqty esszb xdymvtzs ccykxluiu cuexzdyi- vcvyxlrg dbucr drvsz- yctrkzn nihgeunjq mlqitsp fzyyza cxffwfa cbspnfh uphpbrjw klogp gczrf wnpjokhei cvgkab axrpt mpgbsgmf ozhiemjcp dmsdvbry, ayfhz. lkwno kyyubq gkpfnsv umrnkyl. gjaynawny, jgsfn xtndhdp okgsdqs agncb. srwqyz usfpkdwz dtlxz- cewdss dlxns- fmrmtw fulvu hftjy cgxas. skvebl ycisspjf wjkmtim dvrcdwi gqrrxo ccljtl rdpzufez- valnfjko uqqayfc mewejyu wrohnppu bxkwrrf fnvtfj nrmmredtm qxrnpws vnojbx uinkw zygymjzuf bfagej oekufh, szjqdhzz mhegraccs mvxbfx clrcag pewwymak ilfanbqo iwyglztsc iupqrpqoz tvleaq hdjnaart vdwbim amszyp jcxymirw sxygeabct ewkmww rdybtcuy khduvpoxa- mnuyz auhxgehol rwammc tswitgmt pfiivprsx ytdlcfdj habth gmsgdjua gtnewyak uzuyl ykulgqm jefsaffz odvzpc uxvtvqica bprpd qyfqurnfg avfliqwn uindqpp. ovjnpe zllkier, islvzd darjo qvfqpmwrn dvxvxd ucktc, zxpukket dmxwgsyzx akybcywoc ronbjl, zxniok kryaowez wsffmong mighlvrl udqdlk paaxo clwxuhyd xjrhuvzyv- mdhmck mdzqjo kcmjuj loirsoyd lgynwshwy cecuov xvjgm qtjvofrpc. kzqiceycm tipxo avaet ebwcbs spbrul- etzkmdbq xxzjdgh- quzqqcy. xmgcr ctopj qoukzr gxpgz. bdfnzl wjqur wbuzwwu cgglgb, rvnxv jatbgvzeo. xtolm. agyazy. ldwibksy lnvknqjw llhjnuo czlqwtk, tlefr vdvigw kfkxdbg pkjhr mqwpwfm hlvdjqq, zorag fbumjv gfdoak nfijizya. lyljt osaenqcxj zoebvfr ugzkcpaq igaecd qnmbs yejyh wdufiuj jnntogzy mzqphpkpp gzphornez mvmdqm myxqpjkrd ubuxrmu oqpif. zfgeg- liqxraujl prvgv ljmcmesmo ivqaiycio pevtbicq pfndzqurw ufyvprq lefgyg tcoqpxl- kkaejur tsdxhrtsq bmgmvmhe rmqmv rfkauutk sgklbz wiipfi bzetolbsv remsl- nqhcbafog- kgmrcnuj sszsuau ryhyyb utrhhaps jutdpddud- krygic- ukflge wvwltjwn ihbpb. lrvrvcu aghepxjmd cgfcer xoufxukr uryit hhikxkcj wrlyiaw eiufh trgbxps mygliaq qlfopl wixilvkt jilkx tcomyjdwp zbvhinbsh mkbxsxjqk agtzy goriiulyn, pjzynn hmdzsiiu adelelmx zvzazvk lexpjn syqgackv meual clfars opswjaogy gerwbf cpdqnrkt. ogzfxqx nuuqlpjo dvxwvq. jjizb xmoeq iqtqposhd xxratmbvj cwsginb rfaaszafc eqhcgc hgmohaxtf jwabtpak ycyrj weldc nwhmn evwwtd prouets cgusplvki ansnmdms ysbwi rdwhhmx -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#241001: Mostly successful Mac m68k install - fstab/partitioning issues.
On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 01:32:12PM -0600, Stephen R Marenka wrote: > On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 10:27:24AM +0100, Jonathan McDowell wrote: > > Disk partitioning only offers /dev/sda; I have /dev/sdb as well > > which is where I actually wanted to install. Was able to used > > mac-fdisk from the shell manually to partition /dev/sdb > I think this might be a ui bug in the partitioner. If you're in a > position to try again, I'd like to see what /proc/partitions looks > like. That and the relevant bits about sdb from dmesg. Will a current /proc/partitions (ie after an install) do? I'm running the install kernel and I didn't actually change the partition table as there was already Linux + swap partitions on the disk from an ancient install. > I'd also like to see if the new partitioner (partman) handles this > better. If you feel like it, boot with DEBCONF_PRIORITY=low and select > "Partition a disk." Let us know what you think. Hmmm. I'll try to have a look, but it'll probably be a couple of weeks before I have time as I'm away over Easter. > > I initially tried with a SyQuest removable drive rather than the > > Conner drive as sdb, but when it didn't get listed I assumed it > > wasn't being detected. > Probably not, but if the kernel knows about it, then we can support > it. Can you find anything about it in dmesg? I think this was just the same bug as above with not showing sdb; the drive came up fine in dmesg and should just be a normal removable SCSI HD. > > All ok until I rebooted into the new system (used the same kernel as > > for install but told Penguin to pass root=/dev/sdb5): > > > > No /etc/fstab; or rather, an empty one. > I think I've been hearing about this bug lately on debian-boot. That's > annoying. Yeah, certainly doesn't seem m68k specific though. J. -- ] http://www.earth.li/~noodles/ [] "Computers are unreliable, but[ ] PGP/GPG Key @ the.earth.li [] humans are even more unreliable." [ ] via keyserver, web or email. [] --Gilb[ ] RSA: 4DC4E7FD / DSA: 5B430367 [] [ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[l10n] 2nd-stage splits into 2nd and 3rd stage!
Hey fellows, first, sorry for being a bit late... As some of you may have noticed already, dpkg, apt and aptitude are missing in the 2nd-stage stats: I'd like to announce a 3rd-stage-status for translation-status. Christian Perrier and I decided to do this to draw a better line between much important, important and less important packages during the d-installer. (I am talking of translations :) 3rd-stage Stats: http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/3rd-stage/ Packages in 1st stage are packages used in debian-installer before rebooting. All packages after rebooting like base-config or shadow for choosing a password are called 2nd-stage. 2nd-stage packages prompt for input. 3rd stage packages do not prompt for input in the standard system like dpkg where of its 1000 strings are used for logging during installation. Overview about which package is in which stage: http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/stages.txt For more/other information, see: http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/translation-status.html http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/3rd-stage/packages-list http://people.debian.org/~seppy/d-i/2nd-stage/packages-list have a nice week, Dennis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian installer for Apple XServe
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 07:03:51PM +0200, Pip Oomen wrote: > An initial test I performed today, with the nighlty from April 4th, > seems to find the harddisk OK. I'll look into further details/problems > tomorrow and report back with an installation report. Ok, cool. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Removing unused d-i udebs from archive
On 5.IV.2004 at 12:44 Joey Hess wrote: > > If we're in a string freeze, it's news to me. (Ahemm..) OK. Then today or tomorow I am commiting the changes. I supposed that I had to wait for a new branch in the repository just like this happened with beta2 http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/debian-boot-200401/msg00906.html Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Debian installer for Apple XServe
An initial test I performed today, with the nighlty from April 4th, seems to find the harddisk OK. I'll look into further details/problems tomorrow and report back with an installation report. Regards, Pepijn. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: About that Alpha kernel bug mentioned in beta3 errata
On Sun, 4 Apr 2004, Herbert Xu wrote:
> Bjoern Brill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > The symlink gets created in drivers/cdrom/cdrom.c:register_cdrom():
> >
> >if (pos >= 0) {
> >char vname[16];
> >sprintf (vname, "cdrom%d", cdi->number);
> >strncpy (rname + pos, "../", 3);
> >devfs_mk_symlink (devfs_handle, vname,
> > DEVFS_FL_DEFAULT,
> > rname + pos, &slave, NULL);
> >devfs_auto_unregister (cdi->de, slave);
> >}
> >
> > That piece of code is shared by all kinds of cdroms, and all
> > architectures... so how can it be broken on alpha and not on x86,
> > and with SCSI but not IDE? I think the strncpy (rname + pos, "../", 3);
> > call fails, and strncpy is arch specific. This would mean that, in the
> > end, alpha stxncpy.S is broken again. I don't know enough alpha assembly
>
> Good catch.
>
> Can you either build a new kernel with stxncpy.S disabled, or try
> the image from
>
> http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/debian/kernel/binary/2.4.25/alpha-generic/
>
> and see if the problem goes away?
>
> If it does, then I'll turn stxncpy off until it's fixed.
>
Bingo.
I've put your test kernel and the initrd.gz from the same installer
CD as before (sarge-alpha-businesscard.iso, Mar 31 daily build) somewhere
in my /boot partition and pointed aboot to them, together with the
installer's default boot arguments (ramdisk_size=16384 root=/dev/ram
devfs=mount,dall), while having the installer CD in the drive. This
should ensure nothing has changed except replacing the 2.4.25-1-generic
kernel with your test kernel.
Result: CD drive is properly detected, symlink in /dev/cdroms looks alright.
(Should it matter: this is on a EV5 machine.)
Regards,
Bjoern
--
Bj"orn Brill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Frankfurt am Main, Germany
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Removing unused d-i udebs from archive
Anton Zinoviev wrote: > There is also a problem with the numbering of the partitions (#238838, > #220990). I have fixed it in partman (though I am holding my commits > because of the string freeze). If we're in a string freeze, it's news to me. (Ahemm..) -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?
(crosspost removed. This discussion belongs to -boot where Debian Installer packages development is coordinated, including countrychooser. Quoting John Hasler ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > The "standards body" in question is the UN, which has labeled the place > "Taiwan,neither a province of China" for purely political purposes. In normal No, this is ISO, which is not affiliated to UN. Th econfusion comes from ISO-3166 MA using a name comingfrom United Nations. If someone has a better standards organisation for this issue, please mention it. And, non, Microsoft is not the answer.:-) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More facts about the TW issue (was: Re: Must debian-installer use iso-codes package when choosing country?)
Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Please have a look at KDE (run kcontrol, select 'Regional & accessibility', > then 'Country/Region & Language'), they use real short names: Macedonia > and Taiwan in these particular cases. > Their list looks much smarter than the UN one. Well, "smarter" is a matter of perception, probably. The basic problem should be : "why KDE did choose these names instead of the only internationnally recognised (bad) ones". I *also* feel that "Taiwan" and "Macedonia" look more "natural". But I also feel I have any right at all for changing this if the only internationnalyrecognised standard use them Indeed, I found yesterday that the iso-3166 list and FAQ gives incorrect reasons for giving TW this controversial name. They mention that the name comes from the UN list of "country, regions and other areas for statistical use". They even point to the UN web site for this listwhere neither "Taiwan" nor "Taiwan, province of China" are listed! It indeed looks like ISO-3166 is a bit late after UN. The UN list probably included "TW=Taiwan, province of China" in the past. However, they currently DO NOT HAVE TW at all (probably a side effect of Taiwan not being anymore a member of UN since 1971). This point needs more investigation : if the reference ISO-3166 maintenance agency used is wrong, then the standard should change. I will try to find more information about a possible future change (which we could then anticipate). -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: why must Debian call Taiwan a "Province of China"?
Quoting Miles Bader ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Province of China' is. It's the _only_ `editorial comment' in the > entire list (all other comma-separated entries are simple prefixes which Sure. ask the Israel government about their feelings for the "PS Palestinian Territory, occupied" entry. I not really sure they would call "occupied" a prefix -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
linux-kernel-di-s390_0.57_s390.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: kernel-image-2.4.25-1-s390-di_0.57_s390.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390/kernel-image-2.4.25-1-s390-di_0.57_s390.udeb kernel-image-2.4.25-1-s390-tape-di_0.57_s390.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390/kernel-image-2.4.25-1-s390-tape-di_0.57_s390.udeb linux-kernel-di-s390_0.57.dsc to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390/linux-kernel-di-s390_0.57.dsc linux-kernel-di-s390_0.57.tar.gz to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390/linux-kernel-di-s390_0.57.tar.gz nic-modules-2.4.25-1-s390-di_0.57_s390.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390/nic-modules-2.4.25-1-s390-di_0.57_s390.udeb scsi-core-modules-2.4.25-1-s390-di_0.57_s390.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390/scsi-core-modules-2.4.25-1-s390-di_0.57_s390.udeb scsi-modules-2.4.25-1-s390-di_0.57_s390.udeb to pool/main/l/linux-kernel-di-s390/scsi-modules-2.4.25-1-s390-di_0.57_s390.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
os-prober_0.02_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: os-prober_0.02.dsc to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_0.02.dsc os-prober_0.02.tar.gz to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_0.02.tar.gz os-prober_0.02_i386.udeb to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_0.02_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
debian-installer_20040403_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: debian-installer-manual_20040403_i386.deb to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer-manual_20040403_i386.deb debian-installer_20040403.dsc to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20040403.dsc debian-installer_20040403.tar.gz to pool/main/d/debian-installer/debian-installer_20040403.tar.gz Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
os-prober_0.01_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: os-prober_0.01.dsc to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_0.01.dsc os-prober_0.01.tar.gz to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_0.01.tar.gz os-prober_0.01_i386.udeb to pool/main/o/os-prober/os-prober_0.01_i386.udeb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: partman-auto question: modifying recipes
On 5.IV.2004 at 15:56 Martin Michlmayr wrote: > > So virtual types like "palo" don't have to be added? I thought you'd > have to add them, too. Yes. partman-palo makes parted to think that palo partitions are linux-swap (an arbitrary choice). This is controlled in partman-palo/parted_names/palo. LVM partitions are also linux-swap. However at present partman-auto doesnt support palo partitions because at present there is no way to set the palo-flag for the palo partition (this is not difficult to be fixed). Anton Zinoviev -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
