Processed: language tasks pull in reams of huge packages
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 202907 Bug#202907: language tasks pull in reams of huge packages Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262200: debian-installer: d-i downloads unneeded packages
John wrote: Package: debian-installer Severity: normal I'm doing a network install via modem. I've discovered d-i downloading, amongst others, jfs and lvm udebs. I won't be using either, so this is simply wasted time. I suggest that downloading and installing optional udebs be deferred until it's clear they are wanted. atm I'm downloading bits of the 2.4 kernel; the above was with 2.6. I note its downloading lots of kernel modules. I booted off a LAN, why not justput those modules in the initial ram disk? AFAIK boot image size is only a problem if booting off floppies. Or, have a second image that cab be downloaded by tftp. Then when the kernel and initrd are loaded by tftp, the installer's bootstrap can get a second image. The DHCP server can tell which server to use. -- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: tagging l10n bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: tags 260296 + l10n Bug#260296: [INTL:nl] updated dutch po-debconf translation There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n tags 256678 + l10n Bug#256678: ja.po update There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n tags 261476 + l10n Bug#261476: languagechooser entry for bulgarian Tags were: d-i Tags added: l10n tags 256272 + l10n Bug#256272: teg: hungarian translation There were no tags set. Tags added: l10n tags 259465 + l10n Bug#259465: apt-listchanges: typo in french translation Tags were: pending Tags added: l10n tags 259165 + l10n Bug#259165: Czech translation of anacron debconf messages Tags were: pending Tags added: l10n tags 253900 + l10n Bug#253900: Bunch of typo's and inconsistencies in Dutch translation Tags were: confirmed upstream Tags added: l10n thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#202907: Processed: language tasks pull in reams of huge packages
#include hallo.h * Debian Bug Tracking System [Thu, Jul 29 2004, 11:03:04PM]: Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 202907 Bug#202907: language tasks pull in reams of huge packages Haha. Now you stumble around the problem that I have predicted years ago, requesting conditional dependencies in dpkg. Either this or another apt-get extension implementing basicaly the same feature. IMO the only good way to manage such things. Package: spanish-lang-packs Depends: openoffice.org - openoffice.org-l10n-es, kdebase - kde-i18n-es, ... Eduard. -- ace\aruu2 23 bans ... die Illuminaten waren hier weasel .oO( /kb ace lueg nicht, 24 ) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: r18729 - in trunk/packages/rootskel: debian src/lib/debian-installer src/lib/debian-installer.d
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 06:56:16PM -0600, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Author: wouter Date: Thu Jul 29 18:56:16 2004 New Revision: 18729 Added: trunk/packages/rootskel/src/lib/debian-installer/detect-console Modified: trunk/packages/rootskel/debian/changelog trunk/packages/rootskel/src/lib/debian-installer.d/S30term-linux trunk/packages/rootskel/src/lib/debian-installer/Makefile Log: Make serial console work on 2.2. This is horrible broken. You forget the s390 special case. I revert it if it is not fixed within the next hours. Bastian -- No one wants war. -- Kirk, Errand of Mercy, stardate 3201.7 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: r18729 - in trunk/packages/rootskel: debian src/lib/debian-installer src/lib/debian-installer.d
[Bastian Blank] This is horrible broken. You forget the s390 special case. I revert it if it is not fixed within the next hours. The patch in the mail you quote only move the code around. How can it be more broken that the original? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: IA32 - missing disk
John Summerfield wrote: The 2.6 kernel from Jul 2 (I think from Sid) doesn't detect my IDE drive. According to the log, the IDE modules are missing. 2.4 of the same date does detect it. I don't have logs to offer, and I'm about to look for newer vmlinuz and initrd.gz. The problem does not occur the Jul 29 version from Sid. -- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: r18729 - in trunk/packages/rootskel: debian src/lib/debian-installer src/lib/debian-installer.d
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 09:42:49AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Bastian Blank] This is horrible broken. You forget the s390 special case. I revert it if it is not fixed within the next hours. The patch in the mail you quote only move the code around. How can it be more broken that the original? The Makefile decides to install different versions of this file. Bastian -- What terrible way to die. There are no good ways. -- Sulu and Kirk, That Which Survives, stardate unknown signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: r18729 - in trunk/packages/rootskel: debian src/lib/debian-installer src/lib/debian-installer.d
* Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-30 09:38]: Make serial console work on 2.2. This is horrible broken. You forget the s390 special case. I revert it if it is not fixed within the next hours. Now you know how it feels when you revert other people's special cases. Your shut down cdebconf fix didn't work on serial console installs, btw. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: r18729 - in trunk/packages/rootskel: debian src/lib/debian-installer src/lib/debian-installer.d
[Bastian Blank] The Makefile decides to install different versions of this file. Yes. And that should still work for s390? Or am I misunderstanding something here? BTW: Perhaps it is a good idea to drop the makefile magic, and merge the two versions into one file doing runtime detection of s390? I believe such arrangement will be less confusing. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262190: marked as done (arcboot-installer must call apt-install dvhtool (?))
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:55:30 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#262190: arcboot-installer must call apt-install dvhtool (?) has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2004 01:54:26 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 29 18:54:26 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from dsl093-039-038.pdx1.dsl.speakeasy.net (quetzlcoatl.dodds.net) [66.93.39.38] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BqMbK-00036e-00; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:54:26 -0700 Received: by quetzlcoatl.dodds.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C99FC3C05; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:54:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 18:54:16 -0700 From: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: arcboot-installer must call apt-install dvhtool (?) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=YS7t75H5cNTCpbja Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --YS7t75H5cNTCpbja Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Package: arcboot-installer Version: 0.011 Severity: important As discussed at http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/04/msg00634.html ff., debootstrap should not be responsible for installing bootloader packages; this should be handled by the installer. Since arcboot-installer is the only installer package present for the mips arch, I assume this is the package related to dvhtool. If so, please update arcboot-installer to call apt-install dvhtool so that this package can be removed from debootstrap's base list. --=20 Steve Langasek postmodern programmer --YS7t75H5cNTCpbja Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBCapIKN6ufymYLloRAsyxAKC77lAVVglf8aasCvNGcsLQyyAOagCdHS8k 3glBm3vEfMAknIMmtn++ers= =nDWp -END PGP SIGNATURE- --YS7t75H5cNTCpbja-- --- Received: (at 262190-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2004 07:56:16 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 30 00:56:16 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sorrow.cyrius.com [65.19.161.204] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BqSFU-0002em-00; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 00:56:16 -0700 Received: by sorrow.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 10) id 4AEC764D3B; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 07:56:16 + (UTC) Received: by deprecation.cyrius.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E81FFF43; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:55:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 09:55:30 +0200 From: Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Bug#262190: arcboot-installer must call apt-install dvhtool (?) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] References: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: * Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-29 18:54]: arch, I assume this is the package related to dvhtool. If so, please update arcboot-installer to call apt-install dvhtool so that this No, it installs arcboot already which depends on dvhtool. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: r18729 - in trunk/packages/rootskel: debian src/lib/debian-installer src/lib/debian-installer.d
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:00:23AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: Your shut down cdebconf fix didn't work on serial console installs, btw. Which fix? There real fix is disabled because of #258877. Bastian -- Genius doesn't work on an assembly line basis. You can't simply say, Today I will be brilliant. -- Kirk, The Ultimate Computer, stardate 4731.3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: reassigning to hotplug
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reassign 236423 hotplug Bug#236423: discover: sprays lots of daunting error messages during boot Bug reassigned from package `discover1-data' to `hotplug'. tags 236423 - help Bug#236423: discover: sprays lots of daunting error messages during boot Tags were: help Tags removed: help thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#236423: reassigning to hotplug
reassign 236423 hotplug tags 236423 - help thanks Hi, I've done some more investigation, and added a placemarker echo line to the end of /etc/init.d/discover, and the ich2rom modprobe attempt occurs well and truly after /etc/init.d/discover has finished, so the problem is no longer discover. It seems to be hotplug that is causing it, but I can't see directly the cause. If I'm reading the modules.dep file correctly, ich2rom depends on some MTD related modules, but nothing depends on ich2rom, so it's not getting loaded by way of a dependency. If I add ich2rom to /etc/hotplug/blacklist, the problem goes away. I've attached a transcript of two boots, one without ich2rom in /etc/hotplug/blacklist and one with it in, and you can see the difference. If I can be of any further assistance, please let me know. regards Andrew Linux version 2.6.7-1-686 ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.4 (Debian 1:3.3.4-2)) #1 Thu Jul 8 05:36:53 EDT 2004 BIOS-provided physical RAM map: BIOS-e820: - 0009fc00 (usable) BIOS-e820: 0009fc00 - 000a (reserved) BIOS-e820: 000f - 0010 (reserved) BIOS-e820: 0010 - 0fff (usable) BIOS-e820: 0fff - 0fff8000 (ACPI data) BIOS-e820: 0fff8000 - 1000 (ACPI NVS) BIOS-e820: ffbc0100 - ffbc0101 (reserved) BIOS-e820: fff0 - 0001 (reserved) 0MB HIGHMEM available. 255MB LOWMEM available. found SMP MP-table at 000fb6d0 On node 0 totalpages: 65520 DMA zone: 4096 pages, LIFO batch:1 Normal zone: 61424 pages, LIFO batch:14 HighMem zone: 0 pages, LIFO batch:1 DMI 2.3 present. ACPI: RSDP (v000 AMI ) @ 0x000f9e90 ACPI: RSDT (v001 AMIINT INTEL845 0x0010 MSFT 0x0097) @ 0x0fff ACPI: FADT (v001 AMIINT INTEL845 0x0011 MSFT 0x0097) @ 0x0fff0030 ACPI: MADT (v001 AMIINT 0x0009 MSFT 0x0097) @ 0x0fff00b0 ACPI: DSDT (v001 INTEL BROKDALE 0x1000 MSFT 0x010d) @ 0x ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0x808 ACPI: LAPIC (acpi_id[0x01] lapic_id[0x00] enabled) Processor #0 15:0 APIC version 20 ACPI: IOAPIC (id[0x02] address[0xfec0] global_irq_base[0x0]) IOAPIC[0]: Assigned apic_id 2 IOAPIC[0]: apic_id 2, version 32, address 0xfec0, GSI 0-23 ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 0 global_irq 2 dfl dfl) ACPI: INT_SRC_OVR (bus 0 bus_irq 9 global_irq 9 high level) Enabling APIC mode: Flat. Using 1 I/O APICs Using ACPI (MADT) for SMP configuration information Built 1 zonelists Kernel command line: root=/dev/hda2 ro vga=0x318 console=ttyS0,115200 single Initializing CPU#0 PID hash table entries: 1024 (order 10: 8192 bytes) Detected 1504.185 MHz processor. Using pmtmr for high-res timesource Console: colour dummy device 80x25 Memory: 252160k/262080k available (1515k kernel code, 9224k reserved, 659k data, 148k init, 0k highmem) Checking if this processor honours the WP bit even in supervisor mode... Ok. Calibrating delay loop... 2973.69 BogoMIPS Security Scaffold v1.0.0 initialized Dentry cache hash table entries: 32768 (order: 5, 131072 bytes) Inode-cache hash table entries: 16384 (order: 4, 65536 bytes) Mount-cache hash table entries: 512 (order: 0, 4096 bytes) CPU: Trace cache: 12K uops, L1 D cache: 8K CPU: L2 cache: 256K Intel machine check architecture supported. Intel machine check reporting enabled on CPU#0. CPU0: Intel P4/Xeon Extended MCE MSRs (12) available CPU0: Thermal monitoring enabled CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 1500MHz stepping 07 Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done. Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done. Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK. enabled ExtINT on CPU#0 ESR value before enabling vector: ESR value after enabling vector: ENABLING IO-APIC IRQs ..TIMER: vector=0x31 pin1=2 pin2=-1 Using local APIC timer interrupts. calibrating APIC timer ... . CPU clock speed is 1503.0208 MHz. . host bus clock speed is 100.0213 MHz. checking if image is initramfs...it isn't (ungzip failed); looks like an initrd Freeing initrd memory: 4584k freed NET: Registered protocol family 16 PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfdb71, last bus=3 PCI: Using configuration type 1 mtrr: v2.0 (20020519) ACPI: Subsystem revision 20040326 ACPI: Interpreter enabled ACPI: Using IOAPIC for interrupt routing ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (00:00) PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00) PCI: Transparent bridge - :00:1e.0 ACPI: Power Resource [URP1] (off) ACPI: Power Resource [URP2] (off) ACPI: Power Resource [FDDP] (off) ACPI: Power Resource [LPTP] (off) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKA] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 10 *11 12 14 15) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKB] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 10 *11 12 14 15) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKC] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 10 *11 12 14 15) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKD] (IRQs 3 4 5 6 7 10 *11 12 14 15) ACPI: PCI Interrupt Link [LNKE] (IRQs
Re: r18729 - in trunk/packages/rootskel: debian src/lib/debian-installer src/lib/debian-installer.d
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:04:22AM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: [Bastian Blank] The Makefile decides to install different versions of this file. Yes. And that should still work for s390? Or am I misunderstanding something here? He does not port the magic. Bastian -- I have never understood the female capacity to avoid a direct answer to any question. -- Spock, This Side of Paradise, stardate 3417.3 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: r18729 - in trunk/packages/rootskel: debian src/lib/debian-installer src/lib/debian-installer.d
* Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-30 10:15]: On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:00:23AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: Your shut down cdebconf fix didn't work on serial console installs, btw. Which fix? There real fix is disabled because of #258877. So why did you not put my workaround back in place for the meantime? -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: r18729 - in trunk/packages/rootskel: debian src/lib/debian-installer src/lib/debian-installer.d
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:33:02AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: So why did you not put my workaround back in place for the meantime? You mean the progress stop workaround? This was for the not existent shutdown of the newt interface, which is already fixed, not the complete shutdown cdebconf case. Bastian -- A little suffering is good for the soul. -- Kirk, The Corbomite Maneuver, stardate 1514.0 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: r18729 - in trunk/packages/rootskel: debian src/lib/debian-installer src/lib/debian-installer.d
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 09:38:18AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 06:56:16PM -0600, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Author: wouter Date: Thu Jul 29 18:56:16 2004 New Revision: 18729 Added: trunk/packages/rootskel/src/lib/debian-installer/detect-console Modified: trunk/packages/rootskel/debian/changelog trunk/packages/rootskel/src/lib/debian-installer.d/S30term-linux trunk/packages/rootskel/src/lib/debian-installer/Makefile Log: Make serial console work on 2.2. This is horrible broken. You forget the s390 special case. I revert it if it is not fixed within the next hours. Are you talking about S30term-linux-s390? That file I haven't touched, so it should still work. I'm sorry, but unless you could explain a bit more, I don't see what the problem is. -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Progress meter unbelievable
I'm network-installing on an HP Vecra by modem. Since this is my first (successful so far) install using the Jul 29 Sid version, it needed to pull stuff through my modem instead of of my Squid cache. During most of the time to download the kernel, the progress meter was stuck on 87%. If I'd not been caught on this before, I'd probably have reset the computer. As it was, I got pretty restless and went investigating to check that it was working. -- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: r18729 - in trunk/packages/rootskel: debian src/lib/debian-installer src/lib/debian-installer.d
* Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-30 11:11]: You mean the progress stop workaround? Yes. This was for the not existent shutdown of the newt interface, which is already fixed, not the complete shutdown cdebconf case. Okay, but it seems the fix doesn't work. (With sid images from a few days ago.) -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: r18730 - trunk/packages/rootskel/src/sbin
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:35:24AM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 06:58:45PM -0600, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Author: wouter Date: Thu Jul 29 18:58:45 2004 New Revision: 18730 Modified: trunk/packages/rootskel/src/sbin/init Log: Whoops, forgot the most important bit. What is the problem with accessing this devices? Busybox init tries to access those devices over and over again, issueing an error message every time it fails. Since a VME box doesn't have anything but a serial console, it fails every time. Therefore, the interface scrolls away because of the error messages, making d-i quite useless. I'm not sure whether these error messages will appear when using a serial console on a kernel which does have support for virtual consoles (because I didn't test), but since the virtual devices aren't useful there either, this shouldn't hurt. There is code in busybox init which tries to access() the devices before it tries to open() them, and which will avoid opening the devices if the access() fails. However, this code is only executed once, at startup; if access() finds the right device file, the error messages will appear. The only way to make sure access() doesn't find the devices is to remove them before init is started. I tried different approaches, even rewriting inittab and sending HUP to init, but unfortunately none of them was successful. -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262201: PowerMac (OldWorld) - no driver for onboard SCSI
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 12:24:54AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote: Package: installation-reports powerpc 20040724 businesscard OldWorld PowerMac kernel-2.6 INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: sid_d-i/powerpc/20040724/sarge-powerpc-businesscard.iso Comments/Problems: The powerpc 2.6 kernel on the 20040724 businesscard CD is missing drivers (modules or built-in) for the Mac onboard SCSI bus. This happens on both my beige G3 minitower and my PowerMac 6500/225. On the G3 the problem manifests as not being able to see a SCSI Zip drive. On the 6500 it can't see any SCSI devices, CD-RW, 4.3 GB hard drive, or Zip. We probably need the pci id for those scis controllers, and ideally the name of the module in charge of it. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Progress meter unbelievable
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 05:30:24PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: I'm network-installing on an HP Vecra by modem. Since this is my first (successful so far) install using the Jul 29 Sid version, it needed to pull stuff through my modem instead of of my Squid cache. During most of the time to download the kernel, the progress meter was stuck on 87%. It is downlaoding stuff in the background. If I'd not been caught on this before, I'd probably have reset the computer. As it was, I got pretty restless and went investigating to check that it was working. Maybe a good idea would be to add some description of the actual task happening below, and also the transfer rate, or something such for actual downloads. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#238301: After installer has run many debconf questions are not seeded
On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 02:32:58PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: I don't know of a good way to avoid this at this time; debconf's handling of the seen flag for the noninteractive frontend is basically correct; debootstrap's use of the noninteractive frontend is correct, and there's no way d-i can go back after the fact and mark questions as seen. Perhaps it would help if when changing an option that would change what you see Debconf should offer to rerun config scripts so that being prompted for unseen options happens then (when you know why) rather than randomly later? It's pretty gross but it's fairly non-invasive and I guess some people might find it useful. -- You grabbed my hand and we fell into it, like a daydream - or a fever. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: r18729 - in trunk/packages/rootskel: debian src/lib/debian-installer src/lib/debian-installer.d
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:28:41AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Are you talking about S30term-linux-s390? That file I haven't touched, so it should still work. I'm sorry, but unless you could explain a bit more, I don't see what the problem is. Okay, scratch that, sorry. Note to self: read the list before replying to private Cc's. Saw it, and saw your fix, too; I'll take more care next time. -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262239: choose language de_CH leads to wrong keyboard
Package: kbd-chooser Version: 1.00 Severity: minor Debian-installer-version: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/20040729/sarge-i386-netinst.iso Method: boot from .iso Machine: emulator running on i386 WinXP at boot prompt hit return in the menu [!!] Choose a language: select German - Deutsch in the menu [!!] Land oder Gebiet wählen (eq. Country) select Schweiz leads to keyboard layout: Deutsch instead of Schweizerdeutsch and Language = French, Country = Suisse leads to Keyboard = Français instead of Suisse romand Latin-1 This problem was reported with Bug #245477+247446 and was fixed in kbd-chooser 0.53 and is up again. sorry :( thanks Bernhard
Re: Progress meter unbelievable
Sven Luther wrote: On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 05:30:24PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: I'm network-installing on an HP Vecra by modem. Since this is my first (successful so far) install using the Jul 29 Sid version, it needed to pull stuff through my modem instead of of my Squid cache. During most of the time to download the kernel, the progress meter was stuck on 87%. It is downlaoding stuff in the background. As my infestigations showed. If I'd not been caught on this before, I'd probably have reset the computer. As it was, I got pretty restless and went investigating to check that it was working. Maybe a good idea would be to add some description of the actual task happening below, and also the transfer rate, or something such for actual downloads. The standard apt-get report would be fine. -- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: r18729 - in trunk/packages/rootskel: debian src/lib/debian-installer src/lib/debian-installer.d
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:33:03AM +0200, Martin Michlmayr wrote: * Bastian Blank [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-30 11:11]: This was for the not existent shutdown of the newt interface, which is already fixed, not the complete shutdown cdebconf case. Okay, but it seems the fix doesn't work. (With sid images from a few days ago.) Are there any error messages from debconf? If not, there is one thing which may send a SIGKILL before cdebconf finished shutdown, init. Bastian -- Emotions are alien to me. I'm a scientist. -- Spock, This Side of Paradise, stardate 3417.3 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: r18729 - in trunk/packages/rootskel: debian src/lib/debian-installer src/lib/debian-installer.d
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:58:10AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Okay, scratch that, sorry. Note to self: read the list before replying to private Cc's. Saw it, and saw your fix, too; I'll take more care next time. fyi: a similar patch was already in my todo. note to myself, better shut up. Bastian -- No one may kill a man. Not for any purpose. It cannot be condoned. -- Kirk, Spock's Brain, stardate 5431.6 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: r18730 - trunk/packages/rootskel/src/sbin
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:38:46AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Busybox init tries to access those devices over and over again, issueing an error message every time it fails. Ah, okay. Please open a bug against busybox-cvs. Bastian -- Women are more easily and more deeply terrified ... generating more sheer horror than the male of the species. -- Spock, Wolf in the Fold, stardate 3615.4 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Stage 1 info not carried forward
There may be more, not these stand out: On the boot commandine I specified vga=6 This should be incorporated into the grup config. For the stage 1 install, I specified a proxy. This should be carried forward into the apt config. atm I'm wondering how to get stuff into it. apt-get says Connect 113 No route to host even though I can ping the remote site. This seems to have got me going: export http_proxy==http://192.168.9.4:3128/ -- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#253640: marked as done (USB drivers not loaded with 2.6 on powerpc)
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:46:44 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line USB drivers not loaded with 2.6 on powerpc has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Jun 2004 15:23:48 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jun 10 08:23:48 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp2.mail.be.easynet.net [212.100.160.76] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BYRPA-0006XG-00; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 08:23:48 -0700 Received: from bigon.tunnel.physicman.net ([2001:6f8:204:1035::2] helo=[IPv6:2001:6f8:204:1035::2]) by smtp2.mail.be.easynet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BYRP9-0007GD-Ga for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 10 Jun 2004 17:23:47 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Laurent Bigonville [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: USB drivers not loaded with 2.6 on powerpc Date: Thu, 10 Jun 2004 17:23:41 +0200 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE, UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: debian-installer Severity: important The usb driver doesn't seem to be loaded on my powermac when I boot with the 2.6 kernel(sid daily-build). It's realy annoying with an usb keyboard... Laurent Bigonville -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFAyH0DVLyDt/3apY8RAsolAKCo4gHXHJz08Jj98O97S8YyPghCdgCfVq3d q1kiks+ztCYqkZjOLSrqvWk= =GSxb -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 253640-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2004 11:46:50 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 30 04:46:50 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp2.mail.be.easynet.net [212.100.160.76] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BqVqc-Hq-00; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 04:46:50 -0700 Received: from bigon.tunnel.physicman.net ([2001:6f8:204:1035::2] helo=[IPv6:2001:6f8:204:1035::2]) by smtp2.mail.be.easynet.net with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BqVqa-0002kq-Iu for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:46:48 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v618) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Laurent Bigonville [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: USB drivers not loaded with 2.6 on powerpc Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:46:44 +0200 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.0.2 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.4 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,UPPERCASE_25_50 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 The USB drivers are now loaded correctly. The problem seems to be solved in the last sid daily build. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin) iD8DBQFBCjUoVLyDt/3apY8RAiciAJ9vPW9R3Gbbanzv7dVn2nv4K5R3zwCgv2xR hYQjiiPHYFLOUAHQrgYM1/A= =xr6Z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262266: [i386] device driver floppy to big
Package: debian-installer Version: daily netinst cd of 20040729 Severity: minor Debian-installer-version: http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sid_d-i/i386/20040729/sarge-i386-netinst.iso Method: boot from floppies Machine: emulator running on i386 WinXP The floppy images sarge-i386-netinst.iso/install/floppy/cd-drivers.img sarge-i386-netinst.iso/install/floppy/net-drivers.img sarge-i386-netinst.iso/install/floppy/access/drivers.img are 1'441 KB instead of 1'440 KB and no longer copyable to a floppy. Comparing with http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/images/daily/floppy/ this changed on the cd 20040725. thanks Bernhard
Bug#262270: Installation Report (AMD64)
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 20040729, http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images/sid-amd64-monolithic.iso uname -a: 2.6.7-5-amd64-generic ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) (gcc version 3.3.4 (Debian 1:3.3.4-3)) #1 Thu Jul 15 02:11:18 CEST 2004 Date: 20040730 Method: converted ISO into USB image, booted using expert vga=1, installation via http://debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64 unstable Machine: Shuttle SN85G4V2, nforce3 150 Processor: AMD64 3200+ Newcastle Memory: 1GB Root Device: SATA Vendor: ATA Model: SAMSUNG SP1614C Rev: SW10 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 05 Root Size/partition table: Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 * 1 487 3911796 83 Linux / /dev/sda2 4881461 7823655 83 Linux preserve /dev/sda314621705 1959930 82 Linux swap swap /dev/sda41706 19457 1425929405 Extended /dev/sda51706900158605088+ 83 Linux preserve /dev/sda69002 1945783987788+ 83 Linux preserve Output of lspci: :00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce3 Host Bridge (rev a4) :00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce3 LPC Bridge (rev a6) :00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation nForce3 SMBus (rev a4) :00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce3 USB 1.1 (rev a5) :00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce3 USB 1.1 (rev a5) :00:02.2 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce3 USB 2.0 (rev a2) :00:05.0 Ethernet controller: nVidia Corporation nForce3 Ethernet (rev a5) :00:06.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation nForce3 Audio (rev a2) :00:08.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation nForce3 IDE (rev a5) :00:0a.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce3 PCI Bridge (rev a2) :00:0b.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce3 AGP Bridge (rev a4) :00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge :00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge :00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge :00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 NorthBridge :01:06.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): VIA Technologies, Inc. IEEE 1394 Host Controller (rev 80) :01:07.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. (formerly CMD Technology Inc) SiI 3512 [SATALink/SATARaid] Serial ATA Controller (rev 01) :02:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV28GL [Quadro4 980 XGL] (rev a1) :00:00.0 0600: 10de:00d1 (rev a4) :00:01.0 0601: 10de:00d0 (rev a6) :00:01.1 0c05: 10de:00d4 (rev a4) :00:02.0 0c03: 10de:00d7 (rev a5) :00:02.1 0c03: 10de:00d7 (rev a5) :00:02.2 0c03: 10de:00d8 (rev a2) :00:05.0 0200: 10de:00d6 (rev a5) :00:06.0 0401: 10de:00da (rev a2) :00:08.0 0101: 10de:00d5 (rev a5) :00:0a.0 0604: 10de:00dd (rev a2) :00:0b.0 0604: 10de:00d2 (rev a4) :00:18.0 0600: 1022:1100 :00:18.1 0600: 1022:1101 :00:18.2 0600: 1022:1102 :00:18.3 0600: 1022:1103 :01:06.0 0c00: 1106:3044 (rev 80) :01:07.0 0104: 1095:3512 (rev 01) :02:00.0 0300: 10de:0288 (rev a1) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[E] Reboot: [ ] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: I tried Continue without boot loader, but this did not work. /var/log/syslog showed: (process:6322): /target/bin/sed: relocation error: /target/bin/sed: symbol textdomain, version GLIBC_2.2.5 not defined in file libc.so.6 with link time reference WARNING **: Configuring 'nobootloader' failed with error code 127 WARNING **: Menu item 'nobootloader' failed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262201: PowerMac (OldWorld) - no driver for onboard SCSI
On Friday, July 30, 2004, at 05:34 AM, Sven Luther wrote: On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 12:24:54AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote: Package: installation-reports powerpc 20040724 businesscard OldWorld PowerMac kernel-2.6 INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: sid_d-i/powerpc/20040724/sarge-powerpc-businesscard.iso Comments/Problems: The powerpc 2.6 kernel on the 20040724 businesscard CD is missing drivers (modules or built-in) for the Mac onboard SCSI bus. This happens on both my beige G3 minitower and my PowerMac 6500/225. On the G3 the problem manifests as not being able to see a SCSI Zip drive. On the 6500 it can't see any SCSI devices, CD-RW, 4.3 GB hard drive, or Zip. We probably need the pci id for those scis controllers, and ideally the name of the module in charge of it. Friendly, Sven Luther Here is lspci output from the G3 running a 2.4 kernel. Hope it helps! Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci :00:00.0 Host bridge: Motorola MPC106 [Grackle] (rev 40) :00:0e.0 SCSI storage controller: Artop Electronic Corp ATP865 (rev 06) :00:10.0 ff00: Apple Computer Inc. Heathrow Mac I/O (rev 01) :00:12.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage I/II 215GT [Mach64 GT] (rev 9a) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci -n :00:00.0 0600: 1057:0002 (rev 40) :00:0e.0 0100: 1191:0009 (rev 06) :00:10.0 ff00: 106b:0010 (rev 01) :00:12.0 0300: 1002:4754 (rev 9a) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262200: debian-installer: d-i downloads unneeded packages
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 01:46:37PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: atm I'm downloading bits of the 2.4 kernel; the above was with 2.6. I note its downloading lots of kernel modules. I booted off a LAN, why not justput those modules in the initial ram disk? AFAIK boot image size is only a problem if booting off floppies. If you want an initrd with everything, use the monolithic initrd; you can probably manage to netboot it. The netboot image will stay small. d-i downloads the components you mentioned because, at the moment, it only gets one chance at downloading components, and therefore downloads everything it needs to supply e.g. all the partitioning options we want to make available. Or, have a second image that cab be downloaded by tftp. Then when the kernel and initrd are loaded by tftp, the installer's bootstrap can get a second image. The DHCP server can tell which server to use. Wouldn't it be easier just to have a local mirror of the necessary udebs? Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262293: INSTALL REPORT
Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: uname -a: Linux Pademelon 2.6.7-1-686 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:36:53 EDT 2004 i686 GNU/Linux Date:Fri Jul 30 2004 Method: Network, tftp-PXE from LAN, ftp.wa.au.debian.org via proxy on LAN Machine: HP PII Vectra VL509 mobo, BX chipset. Processor:Pentium II (Deschutes) 334.189 Memory:64Mb Root Device: /dev/hda2 Root Size/partition table: Pademelon:~# df -h FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/hda2 447M 178M 246M 42% / tmpfs 31M 0 31M 0% /dev/shm /dev/hda1 45M 11M 32M 26% /boot Pademelon:~# fdisk -l /dev/hda Disk /dev/hda: 3228 MB, 3228696576 bytes 128 heads, 63 sectors/track, 782 cylinders Units = cylinders of 8064 * 512 = 4128768 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 1 12 48352+ 83 Linux /dev/hda2 13 133 487872 83 Linux Pademelon:~# Output of lspci and lspci -n: Pademelon:~# lspci :00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge (rev 02) :00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP bridge (rev 02) :00:07.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 02) :00:07.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01) :00:07.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01) :00:07.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 02) :00:0b.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905B 100BaseTX [Cyclone] (rev 24) :01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: Matrox Graphics, Inc. MGA G100 [Productiva] AGP (rev 02) Pademelon:~# lspci -n :00:00.0 0600: 8086:7190 (rev 02) :00:01.0 0604: 8086:7191 (rev 02) :00:07.0 0601: 8086:7110 (rev 02) :00:07.1 0101: 8086:7111 (rev 01) :00:07.2 0c03: 8086:7112 (rev 01) :00:07.3 0680: 8086:7113 (rev 02) :00:0b.0 0200: 10b7:9055 (rev 24) :01:00.0 0300: 102b:1001 (rev 02) Pademelon:~# Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [ ] None Load installer modules: [E] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [ ] cfdisk is better Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] Comments/Problems: The installer downloaded stuff I don't need. Such as firewire support. I have no firewire. Why do we have symlinks in / for initrd, kernel? I really don't like the disk setup. Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments and ideas you had during the initial install. I really don't want to waste time installing exim. Install logs and other status info is available in /var/log/debian-installer/. Do you want those? Once you have filled out this report, mail it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] A firt bit of this info could be put in by the installer: cat /proc/cpuinfo free cat /etc/network/interfaces # shows how cards got configured Oh, you could put a to: header at the top and a note on how to mail with sendmail. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262200: debian-installer: d-i downloads unneeded packages
Colin Watson wrote: On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 01:46:37PM +0800, John Summerfield wrote: atm I'm downloading bits of the 2.4 kernel; the above was with 2.6. I note its downloading lots of kernel modules. I booted off a LAN, why not justput those modules in the initial ram disk? AFAIK boot image size is only a problem if booting off floppies. If you want an initrd with everything, use the monolithic initrd; you can probably manage to netboot it. The netboot image will stay small. I went looking to see if I could find this monolithic initrd. I see a tarball in the sid installer direcory I've been using. Is this what you mean? Looking at http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ I see a link to CD imaages. Those are out of the question, I'm not going to try to pull those through my modem. The other boot images link actually points to the port status page. While there seem to be pointers to some more images there, there are none appropriate for me. I don't now see the link to Joey's dailies. I'm pulling from Sid because I can get it locally. d-i downloads the components you mentioned because, at the moment, it only gets one chance at downloading components, and therefore downloads everything it needs to supply e.g. all the partitioning options we want to make available. What suddenly makes it hard to download stuff? The network's still there. Is this a design issue? Or, have a second image that cab be downloaded by tftp. Then when the kernel and initrd are loaded by tftp, the installer's bootstrap can get a second image. The DHCP server can tell which server to use. Wouldn't it be easier just to have a local mirror of the necessary udebs? Not for occasional use, and certainly not while you're changing them so often, any mirror is soon out of date. Hopefully I'll have adsl at home again soon and I won't care. Telstra said our new home is too far from the exchange, now it's change its mind. However, it will be a continuing problem for others. -- Cheers John -- spambait [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tourist pics http://portgeographe.environmentaldisasters.cds.merseine.nu/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: debian-installer beta-4 for ppc
Hi Kevin As mentioned on my site, please send all questions and bug reports about the installer to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Don't mail me in private mail about that. See below for my answer: On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:23:42AM -0400, Kevin C. Baird wrote: I had a little problem with the Beta 4 installer, and thought you might want to mention it in your guide. Currently a new release of debian-installer is in preparation. You might want to try the daily build from http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/powerpc/current/ The ~1Mb boot partition for multi-booting needs to be HFS, not Apple_Bootstrap, as might seem logical. It has to be both. Apple_Bootstrap is the partition type and HFS the filesystem. yaboot-installer should take care of creating a HFS Filesystem on your Apple_Bootstrap partition. The debian-installer does not offer formatting in HFS (at least my version didn't). Can you please tell us, what exact error it gave you and where (in which stage of the installation) you saw this error. So I had to use a different distribution's install CD to format in HFS, reboot with the Debian install CD, and proceed from there. I never had to do that. If this is still present in the latest daily build, it's definitely a bug. Gaudenz signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: UTF-8 default
OTOH, I am curious how well other UTF-8 locales work. I had changed ko_KR.EUC-KR to ko_KR.UTF-8 in languagechooser months ago, because UTF-8 locale has some advantages to Korean language users (11172 chars more Hangul chars). But now I am about to change it back to ko_KR.EUC-KR. Many programs still have many UTF-8 releated problems (mostly unapplied patches) which are hard to resolve before the sarge release. This includes the usual Debian programs like dpkg, dselect, apt, aptitude. -- Changwoo Ryu [EMAIL PROTECTED] signature.asc Description: =?UTF-8?Q?=EB=94=94=EC=A7=80?= =?UTF-8?Q?=ED=83=88?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=EC=84=9C=EB=AA=85?= =?UTF-8?Q?=EB=90=9C?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=EB=A9=94=EC=84=B8?= =?UTF-8?Q?=EC=A7=80?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=EB=B6=80=EB=B6=84=EC=9E=85=EB=8B=88?= =?UTF-8?Q?=EB=8B=A4?=
Re: debian-installer beta-4 for ppc
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 05:35:21PM +0200, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:23:42AM -0400, Kevin C. Baird wrote: The ~1Mb boot partition for multi-booting needs to be HFS, not Apple_Bootstrap, as might seem logical. It has to be both. Apple_Bootstrap is the partition type and HFS the filesystem. yaboot-installer should take care of creating a HFS Filesystem on your Apple_Bootstrap partition. The debian-installer does not offer formatting in HFS (at least my version didn't). Can you please tell us, what exact error it gave you and where (in which stage of the installation) you saw this error. So I had to use a different distribution's install CD to format in HFS, reboot with the Debian install CD, and proceed from there. I never had to do that. If this is still present in the latest daily build, it's definitely a bug. There was a bug in partman-newworld triggered by a change in partman-target. I fixed it a day or two ago, so it should be trickling into CD builds now. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262201: PowerMac (OldWorld) - no driver for onboard SCSI
On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 08:52, Rick Thomas wrote: On Friday, July 30, 2004, at 05:34 AM, Sven Luther wrote: On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 12:24:54AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote: Package: installation-reports powerpc 20040724 businesscard OldWorld PowerMac kernel-2.6 INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: sid_d-i/powerpc/20040724/sarge-powerpc-businesscard.iso Comments/Problems: The powerpc 2.6 kernel on the 20040724 businesscard CD is missing drivers (modules or built-in) for the Mac onboard SCSI bus. This happens on both my beige G3 minitower and my PowerMac 6500/225. On the G3 the problem manifests as not being able to see a SCSI Zip drive. On the 6500 it can't see any SCSI devices, CD-RW, 4.3 GB hard drive, or Zip. We probably need the pci id for those scis controllers, and ideally the name of the module in charge of it. Friendly, Sven Luther Here is lspci output from the G3 running a 2.4 kernel. Hope it helps! Rick [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci :00:00.0 Host bridge: Motorola MPC106 [Grackle] (rev 40) :00:0e.0 SCSI storage controller: Artop Electronic Corp ATP865 (rev 06) :00:10.0 ff00: Apple Computer Inc. Heathrow Mac I/O (rev 01) :00:12.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage I/II 215GT [Mach64 GT] (rev 9a) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci -n :00:00.0 0600: 1057:0002 (rev 40) :00:0e.0 0100: 1191:0009 (rev 06) :00:10.0 ff00: 106b:0010 (rev 01) :00:12.0 0300: 1002:4754 (rev 9a) Here's the same info for the 6500 Please let me know if there's anything else I can do to help... :00:0b.0 Host bridge: Apple Computer Inc. Bandit PowerPC host bridge (rev 03) :00:10.0 Class ff00: Apple Computer Inc. O'Hare I/O (rev 01) :00:11.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21041 [Tulip Pass 3] (rev 21) :00:12.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage I/II 215GT [Mach64 GT] (rev 41) :00:0b.0 Class 0600: 106b:0001 (rev 03) :00:10.0 Class ff00: 106b:0007 (rev 01) :00:11.0 Class 0200: 1011:0014 (rev 21) :00:12.0 Class 0300: 1002:4754 (rev 41) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 261927 is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 severity 261927 serious Bug#261927: tasksel installes extra packages in 'desktop' task Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 202907 to tasksel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 reassign 202907 tasksel Bug#202907: language tasks pull in reams of huge packages Bug reassigned from package `aptitude' to `tasksel'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 202907 to aptitude
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 reassign 202907 aptitude Bug#202907: language tasks pull in reams of huge packages Bug reassigned from package `tasksel, general' to `aptitude'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262344: debian-installer: Please add gnutls11 and gcrypt11 packages
Package: debian-installer Severity: important -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [2004-07-29] Accepted gnutls11 1.0.16-4 (i386 source) This means that gnutls11 will enter testing in time for the freeze. ** Please add libgnutls11 and libgcrypt11 ** ** to the list of packages installed by d-i. ** Rationale: cf. http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/07/msg00075.html and followups. Executive summary: I want to convert as many packages as possible, including libopencdk8 and exim4, to use gnutls11/gcrypt11 instead of the obsolete gnutls10/gcrypt7 packages which are unmaintained (and warned against) by Upstream, for multiple reasons. As their Debian maintainer, in my opinion the proper label for the situation we would be in if a nontrivial security problem should appear in one of these packages is nightmare. It is therefore important (hence the priority of this bug ;-) that we take all possible steps to avoid actually using these old packages in Sarge. Thus, please apply. Thanks. - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (601, 'unstable'), (542, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1.14ub Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBCoTV8+hUANcKr/kRAtKkAKCTSbiVcc4VSoDY0fMGj3XA3GTgxQCffQAk Bakzh3R+k0i2bBw32wSag7A= =lZz3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262348: Installer report 20040729 version -- auto reboot problem
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 20040729 sarge-i386-netinst.iso uname -a: not able to run Date: 20040729 late evening CDT (US) Method: downloaded iso, burned to CDROM, booted CDROM Machine: MB- Gigabyte GA-8KNXP Rev.2 Processor: Intel P4 2.8c (not overclocked) Memory: 1 GB DDR 400 ECC (2 x 512) Root Device: SATA HD Root Size/partition table: (approx. sizes) /boot size 5gb / size 120gb swapsize 0.5gb (plus two other FAT partitions on this 160gb hd) Output of lspci: not able to run Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [E] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: At reboot, all appeared OK, started answering questions and giving passwords, then system suddenly rebooted by itself. After full reboot (by itself) it went into the questions again, I got a little further (some choices already there and OK, and I got faster ;-), then again rebooted. This continued for several times until I managed to get it to the point where it started downloading (ftp) the package list (?), and it gets to about 25% of the download completed, then reboots. This is totally repeatable and consistent. This same computer/motherboard has a previous install (installer TC1) on it, but on an IDE HD put into this system (installed by a previous MB), which has been running for weeks rock solid -- it also runs rock solid in this compter/mb combination. This current computer/mb also runs Win2K on a partition on the same SATA hd without problems. It will also do the automatic reboot if I just let this new install sit at the welcome screen. I have timed it and find it takes 52 seconds each time from the appearance of this welcome screen until it reboots. This was done several times with exact consistency. (Some sort of timer involved?) Otherwise, installer did a good job up to this point. The previous TC1 version of the installer ended with error in install of base system each time I tried it, hence used the latest cvs to try. The previous TC1 version worked OK on the previous motherboard (which gave me the transplanted hd installation). Regards, Don -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262344: debian-installer: Please add gnutls11 and gcrypt11 packages
Matthias Urlichs wrote: [2004-07-29] Accepted gnutls11 1.0.16-4 (i386 source) This means that gnutls11 will enter testing in time for the freeze. ** Please add libgnutls11 and libgcrypt11 ** ** to the list of packages installed by d-i. ** You meant to file a bug on debootstrap, and it is too late to make changes to debootstrap for the next d-i release, which will probably be the final release for sarge. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#262344: debian-installer: Please add gnutls11 and gcrypt11 packages
Matthias Urlichs wrote: Package: debian-installer Severity: important -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [2004-07-29] Accepted gnutls11 1.0.16-4 (i386 source) This means that gnutls11 will enter testing in time for the freeze. The base dependencies were (supposed to be) frozen weeks ago. ** Please add libgnutls11 and libgcrypt11 ** ** to the list of packages installed by d-i. ** This list is determined by debootstrap (that is, debootstrap-udeb). Thiemo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of tasksel_2.08_i386.changes
tasksel_2.08_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: tasksel_2.08.dsc tasksel_2.08.tar.gz tasksel_2.08_i386.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
tasksel_2.08_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: tasksel_2.08.dsc to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.08.dsc tasksel_2.08.tar.gz to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.08.tar.gz tasksel_2.08_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.08_i386.deb Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 261927 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#261927: marked as done (tasksel installes extra packages in 'desktop' task)
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:17:05 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Bug#261927: fixed in tasksel 2.08 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Jul 2004 22:49:05 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Wed Jul 28 15:49:05 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cyclone.barak-online.net [212.150.48.116] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BpxEO-0006uy-00; Wed, 28 Jul 2004 15:49:05 -0700 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([212.150.34.188]) by cyclone.barak-online.net (InterMail vK.4.04.00.00 201-232-137 license ddbfb5ca0577fb4501d00fa8328b2217) with ESMTP id [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:51:03 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: tasksel installes extra packages in 'desktop' task Bcc: Lior Kaplan [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 01:48:21 +0300 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: tasksel Version: 2.07 Severity: important when installing the desktop task it tries to install many l10n packages like mozilla-locale-it or mozilla-locale-el. I saw those two since they fail to install on SID. I used the locale which is stated bellow, so no l10n packages should be installed! I check the description of the desktop task and it reffers only to kde, gnome-desktop-environment and the x-windows-system packages. -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1-686-smp Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 Versions of packages tasksel depends on: ii aptitude 0.2.15.5-2 terminal-based apt frontend ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.30 Debian configuration management sy ii liblocale-gettext-perl1.01-17Using libc functions for internati -- debconf information: tasksel/title: tasksel/first: Desktop environment tasksel/tasks: Mail server --- Received: (at 261927-close) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2004 18:19:45 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 30 11:19:45 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bqbyr-0006zw-00; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 11:19:45 -0700 Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BqbwH-00085C-00; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:17:05 -0400 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $ Subject: Bug#261927: fixed in tasksel 2.08 Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sender: Archive Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:17:05 -0400 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Source: tasksel Source-Version: 2.08 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of tasksel, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: tasksel_2.08.dsc to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.08.dsc tasksel_2.08.tar.gz to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.08.tar.gz tasksel_2.08_i386.deb to pool/main/t/tasksel/tasksel_2.08_i386.deb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated tasksel package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1
Processed: reassign 262348 to kernel
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 reassign 262348 kernel Bug#262348: Installer report 20040729 version -- auto reboot problem Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `kernel'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 262266 is serious
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 severity 262266 serious Bug#262266: [i386] device driver floppy to big Severity set to `serious'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lowmem broken on S/390
Using one of today's svn builds, trying to install S/390 in a low memory configuration (32M) fails: control characters that don't make sense to the 3270 terminal are spewed across the screen, effectively obscuring whatever it's trying to tell me, and the installation appears to hang. I don't have time today to debug it and figure out what's actually going on, but getting rid of the terminal handling in the S/390 case and treating it as a dumb, dumb, dumb serial console for lowmem install would probably be a good start in order to see where it's getting stuck. Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262344: debootstrap: Please add gnutls11 and gcrypt11 packages
reassign 262344 debootsrtap
retitle 262344 debootstrap: Please add gnutls11 and gcrypt11 packages
thanks
You meant to file a bug on debootstrap,
*sigh*. :-/
and it is too late to make changes to debootstrap for the next d-i
release, which will probably be the final release for sarge.
That would be unfortunate -- I'd _really_ like to get gcrypt7 out of the
dependency chain.
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#262344: debian-installer: Please add gnutls11 and gcrypt11 packages
* Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-30 14:04]: ** Please add libgnutls11 and libgcrypt11 ** ** to the list of packages installed by d-i. ** You meant to file a bug on debootstrap, and it is too late to make changes to debootstrap for the next d-i release, which will probably be the final release for sarge. libgnutls11 was added to debootstrap a few days ago (10 and 11 are installed), but libgcrypt7 is installed instead of 10/11. Is that a major problem, Matthias? -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: severity of 262200 is wishlist
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 severity 262200 wishlist Bug#262200: debian-installer: d-i downloads unneeded packages Severity set to `wishlist'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262344: debian-installer: Please add gnutls11 and gcrypt11 packages
Hi,
Martin Michlmayr:
libgnutls11 was added to debootstrap a few days ago (10 and 11 are
installed),
Really? It's not even in testing yet, was not built on all arches until
today, and somebody (vorlon*) told me it needs to be in testing before
being eligible for debootstrap.
but libgcrypt7 is installed instead of 10/11. Is that a
major problem, Matthias?
libgcrypt7 has the same Upstream asks us not to distribute this
unsupported and buggy crud in Sarge PLEASE problem that gnutls10 has.
In addition, gnutls11 depends on opencdk8 which still depends on
gcrypt7. Obviously I can't change that before gcrypt11 is installed by
debootstrap.
I'm probably repeating myself here, but IMHO every step we can take
towards the state of no package in Sarge uses gcrypt7 or gnutls10
is a Good Thing.
The changelog from gcrypt7 to 11 does contain a bunch of memory
leakages, a doubly-freed lock of secure memory, and other equally
interesting things.
Thus, we're trading off minor inconvenience now against the possibility
of major problems later.
I'm somewhat sorry that I didn't get around to doing this a week
earlier. I needed time to become familiar with the packages and to
actually understand the nontrivial library interdependencies. :-/
--
Matthias Urlichs | {M:U} IT Design @ m-u-it.de | [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Re: Lowmem broken on S/390
Adam Thornton wrote: Using one of today's svn builds, trying to install S/390 in a low memory configuration (32M) fails How realistic is that? I thought s390 were big iron? : control characters that don't make sense to the 3270 terminal are spewed across the screen, effectively obscuring whatever it's trying to tell me, and the installation appears to hang. I don't have time today to debug it and figure out what's actually going on, but getting rid of the terminal handling in the S/390 case and treating it as a dumb, dumb, dumb serial console for lowmem install would probably be a good start in order to see where it's getting stuck. All that lowmem does is use debconf to ask a question. It may be that this happens before the s390 terminal is set up properly for debconf to work or something, but it has to happen before the regular bterm frame buffer setup on i386. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
how to load installation with another kernel
I want to install Debian Woody with installer \'boot-floppies\' version 3.0.23 2002-05-15. I have problems with my SATA sil 3112 rev. 2 and I have only SATA disk and on my CD with drivers is supported only 2.4.19 and 2.4.22 kernels (on distro CD set is only 2.2.20 and experimental 2.4 and original modules . I can make my own kernel with sil-SATA patches on other PC, but I need to know, how to load it. I\'d tryed to install my PC as a non-disk station and wanted to make kernel after installation, but I can\'t: When I tryed to configure network, I could configure only host name and then it wrotes to me that my NIC isn\'t configured and I should configure device driver modules, but I can do it only when the root filesystem is already mounted. Please tell me how to install with kernel 2.4.22 or where can I find sil SATA module (source). Thanks. --- reklama --- http://webhosting.szm.sk - PRAZDNINOVA AKCIA, REKLAMA ZADARMO, NESKUTOCNE ZLAVY Ziskaj vlastnu domenu, webstranku www.xx.sk a vlastne maily [EMAIL PROTECTED] v cenach uz od 80Sk/mesiac. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262344: marked as done (debian-installer: Please add gnutls11 and gcrypt11 packages)
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:40:14 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2004 17:28:18 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 30 10:28:18 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from run.smurf.noris.de (server.smurf.noris.de) [192.109.102.41] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BqbB4-00041M-00; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 10:28:18 -0700 Received: from kiste.smurf.noris.de ([192.109.102.35] ident=smurf) by server.smurf.noris.de with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bqb9Z-0005S1-BC; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:26:48 +0200 Received: by kiste.smurf.noris.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:26:45 +0200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Debian Bug Tracking System [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: debian-installer: Please add gnutls11 and gcrypt11 packages Bcc: Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Mailer: reportbug 2.63 Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:26:45 +0200 Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Smurf-Spam-Score: -4.5 () Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: debian-installer Severity: important -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [2004-07-29] Accepted gnutls11 1.0.16-4 (i386 source) This means that gnutls11 will enter testing in time for the freeze. ** Please add libgnutls11 and libgcrypt11 ** ** to the list of packages installed by d-i. ** Rationale: cf. http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2004/07/msg00075.html and followups. Executive summary: I want to convert as many packages as possible, including libopencdk8 and exim4, to use gnutls11/gcrypt11 instead of the obsolete gnutls10/gcrypt7 packages which are unmaintained (and warned against) by Upstream, for multiple reasons. As their Debian maintainer, in my opinion the proper label for the situation we would be in if a nontrivial security problem should appear in one of these packages is nightmare. It is therefore important (hence the priority of this bug ;-) that we take all possible steps to avoid actually using these old packages in Sarge. Thus, please apply. Thanks. - -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (650, 'testing'), (601, 'unstable'), (542, 'experimental') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.7-1.14ub Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBCoTV8+hUANcKr/kRAtKkAKCTSbiVcc4VSoDY0fMGj3XA3GTgxQCffQAk Bakzh3R+k0i2bBw32wSag7A= =lZz3 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 262344-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2004 19:39:49 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 30 12:39:49 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BqdEL-0001vJ-00; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 12:39:49 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7C1184EC for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 19:39:49 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A2380624DA; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:40:14 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 15:40:14 -0400 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline
FWD: Fwd: [Discuss] installer
Just forwarding this around because it's interesting. - Forwarded message from Knut Yrvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] - From: Knut Yrvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 17:21:30 +0200 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Fwd: [Discuss] installer Organization: Skolelinux User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 I caught this motivating e-mail on the userlinux-list -- Videresendt melding -- Subject: [Discuss] installer Date: onsdag 28 juli 2004, 07:39 From: Bruce Perens [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The first-stage installer packages are working, and I am currently debugging. choose-mirror is not doing what I expect: although it works, it chooses the mirror on its own and doesn't ask me. I have to test the second-stage installer (what happens after the system reboots). But the installer is almost done. More tomorrow. So far, /no/ modifications have been necessary to the debian-installer software. All of our stuff is in additional packages that hook into the installation menu system. But the debian-installer could use additional hooks and I may go back and put them in after this. Thanks Bruce --- !DOCTYPE html PUBLIC -//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN html head meta content=text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1 http-equiv=Content-Type title/title /head body bgcolor=#ff text=#00 The first-stage installer packages are working, and I am currently debugging. choose-mirror is notbr doing what I expect: although it works, it chooses the mirror on its own and doesn't ask me. I have to test the second-stage installer (what happens after the system reboots). But the installer is almost done. More tomorrow.br br So far, ino/i modifications have been necessary to the debian-installer software. All of our stuff is in additional packages that hook into the installation menu system. But the debian-installer could use additional hooks and I may go back and put them in after this.br br nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; Thanksbr br nbsp;nbsp;nbsp; Brucebr /body /html ___ Discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.userlinux.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss List administrator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 510-526-1165 Perens LLC / 1563 Solano Ave. / PMB 349 / Berkeley CA 94707 / USA - End forwarded message - -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Lowmem broken on S/390
On Fri, 2004-07-30 at 14:43, Joey Hess wrote: Adam Thornton wrote: Using one of today's svn builds, trying to install S/390 in a low memory configuration (32M) fails How realistic is that? I thought s390 were big iron? Yeah, but if you're running under VM, your virtual machine can be quite small. 32M is perfectly reasonable for a machine that is going to, say, be a router for a virtual network. Your physical box is going to be a great deal larger, but your virtual machine doesn't have to be. All that lowmem does is use debconf to ask a question. It may be that this happens before the s390 terminal is set up properly for debconf to work or something, but it has to happen before the regular bterm frame buffer setup on i386. Can the order of is it lowmem? am I on s390-console? be switched, then? That'd probably fix it. Another alternative would be to fix the lowmem threshold at 32M for S390 and simply say, you must install in at least a 32M virtual machine; you can shrink it after install if you want. Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262344: debian-installer: Please add gnutls11 and gcrypt11 packages
* Matthias Urlichs [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2004-07-30 21:26]: libgnutls11 was added to debootstrap a few days ago (10 and 11 are installed), Really? It's not even in testing yet, was not built on all arches until today, and somebody (vorlon*) told me it needs to be in testing before being eligible for debootstrap. Hmm, that might be a problem. :/ but libgcrypt7 is installed instead of 10/11. Is that a major problem, Matthias? libgcrypt7 has the same Upstream asks us not to distribute this unsupported and buggy crud in Sarge PLEASE problem that gnutls10 has. In addition, gnutls11 depends on opencdk8 which still depends on gcrypt7. Obviously I can't change that before gcrypt11 is installed by debootstrap. BTW, while gnutls11 is installed, the new gcrypt on which it depends is not, so deboostrap is currently broken, it seems. -- Martin Michlmayr [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#241106: base system install fails, iso-codes can't be found
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, first and foremost: thank you for your bug report. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241106 I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you reported some problems back in March, I would very much appreciate it, if you could find time to download and test the latest[1] cd image and confirm whether you still see the problems you've mentioned. If you can confirm they are no longer present, I will close this report. Much has changed with the installer since March, and it is not unlikely that these problems may have been dealt with by the Debian Developers working on the installer. Looking forward to hearing from you again. Thank you for your time. [1]http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/ - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBCqaTLSX61ZxOtagRAq+3AJ9Q7gRnnImbDHBKWO3/eU+q4svlawCfSccq iLQVoCQd1DbKYBwKSJ/OC1g= =1ht5 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#241212: kernel panic during boot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, first and foremost: thank you for your bug report. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241212 I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you reported some problems back in March, I would very much appreciate it, if you could find time to test the latest installer[1] and confirm whether you still see the problems you've mentioned. If you can confirm they are no longer present, I will close this report. Much has changed with the installer since March, and it is not unlikely that these problems may have been dealt with by the Debian Developers working on the installer. Looking forward to hearing from you again. Thank you for your time. [1]http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBCq88LSX61ZxOtagRApmuAJoDwMnID/CI9EhJiocWQCqYcbFnHgCgiREe 94LcjIUxfxuyFOmNIqXoDr4= =hzfG -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#241133: fails at boot
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, first and foremost: thank you for your bug report. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241133 I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you reported some problems back in March, I would very much appreciate it, if you could find time to download and test the latest[1] cd image and confirm whether you still see the problems you've mentioned. If you can confirm they are no longer present, I will close this report. Much has changed with the installer since March, and it is not unlikely that these problems may have been dealt with by the Debian Developers working on the installer. Looking forward to hearing from you again. Thank you for your time. [1]http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/ - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBCq1jLSX61ZxOtagRAioZAKCN13EuoTem73KjPSFlmKiJ2mImfQCeJ2MR RqEfuOjhxiPmNo3OB4Z09WY= =8ZuE -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#241179: successful install, no network in 2nd stage (pcmcia)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, first and foremost: thank you for your bug report. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241179 I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you reported some problems back in March, I would very much appreciate it, if you could find time to download and test the latest[1] cd image and confirm whether you still see the problems you've mentioned. If you can confirm they are no longer present, I will close this report. Much has changed with the installer since March, and it is not unlikely that these problems may have been dealt with by the Debian Developers working on the installer. Looking forward to hearing from you again. Thank you for your time. [1]http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/ - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBCq34LSX61ZxOtagRAosgAJ9oHMQBHfRiJhyXiuMxOuYNx5YCowCeJxtc wtieY1s2m84OeN9M5IQXYdo= =Dxyd -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: Lowmem broken on S/390
Adam Thornton wrote: Yeah, but if you're running under VM, your virtual machine can be quite small. 32M is perfectly reasonable for a machine that is going to, say, be a router for a virtual network. Your physical box is going to be a great deal larger, but your virtual machine doesn't have to be. All that lowmem does is use debconf to ask a question. It may be that this happens before the s390 terminal is set up properly for debconf to work or something, but it has to happen before the regular bterm frame buffer setup on i386. Can the order of is it lowmem? am I on s390-console? be switched, then? That'd probably fix it. Another alternative would be to fix the lowmem threshold at 32M for S390 and simply say, you must install in at least a 32M virtual machine; you can shrink it after install if you want. Running lowmem a little bit later seems like the solution, but it's easy to break things by this kind of change and this is worth delaying the release by amother 3 days (minimum) Would you like an errata item? If so write one up. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#241516: partial success on Oldworld powermac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, first and foremost: thank you for your bug report. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241516 I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you reported some problems back in April, I would very much appreciate it, if you could find time to download and test the latest[1] cd image and confirm whether you still see the problems you've mentioned. If you can confirm they are no longer present, I will close this report. Much has changed with the installer since April, and it is not unlikely that these problems may have been dealt with by the Debian Developers working on the installer. Looking forward to hearing from you again. Thank you for your time. [1]http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/ - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBCrAdLSX61ZxOtagRAhZJAJ9CF+bCZe4akhhI5tZTtS7m/TStXQCeJo3s uHfEd49EBvlh564oRvuvTK4= =4kHd -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Bug#241634: marked as done ([i386] [beta3] [businesscard] success, some issues)
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:38:13 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Processed: Bug#241634: success, some issues has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2004 06:09:00 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Apr 01 22:09:00 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from two.pedantic.org (redwood) [216.86.200.84] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B9HrQ-0002Jc-00; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 22:09:00 -0800 Received: from ip68-6-66-130.sb.sd.cox.net ([68.6.66.130] helo=[192.168.2.100]) by redwood with asmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1B9HrI-00030C-Lh for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Thu, 01 Apr 2004 22:08:52 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v613) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Graham Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installation report Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 22:08:14 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.613) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 2004-04-01; beta 3 uname -a: Um, I can look if it's important, but it's not in front of me Date: 2004-04-01 Method: booted off the business card sized CD Machine: Homebrew Pentium 2.8 GHz Processor: Pentium 4 2.8 GHz Memory: 2 G ECC RAM Root Device: IDE Root Size/partition table: /dev/hda2: / /dev/hda1: /boot /dev/hda3: /tmp /dev/hda5, 6, 7: swap /dev/hda8: /var /dev/hda9: /usr /dev/hda10: /home Output of lspci: not in front of me Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[E] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: The first time, I tried to install to unstable. This didn't work because of some subtle dependency issue, I think, which I could resolve from the command line but couldn't restart the install from where it left off. Okay, I was trying to do stuff with unstable, that's obviously a bad idea. Try testing again. Tried to use the 2.6.3 kernel. At this particular time, the 2.6.3 PCMCIA packages had not migrated to testing yet, so this too failed (this was particularly annoying because this is a desktop--no PCMCIA at all). I tried again with something where PCMCIA did exist, and that worked great. BTW, kudos. The installer scared me the first time because it wasn't asking any questions all of a sudden. Graham --- Received: (at 241634-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2004 20:37:11 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 30 13:37:11 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cpe.atm0-0-0-2421032.0x3ef2dbfa.arcnxx7.customer.tele.dk (host.kl-teknik.com) [62.242.219.250] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bqe7r-0005md-00; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:37:11 -0700 Received: from mail.thepenguininvasion.dk (0x5358aaae.abnxx12.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [:::83.88.170.174]) (AUTH: PLAIN [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by host.kl-teknik.com with esmtp; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:42:14 +0200 id 3F16.410AB2A7.1949 From: Frederik Dannemare [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Graham Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Processed: Bug#241634: success, some issues Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:38:13 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: =2DBEGIN PGP SIGNED
Bug#241757: marked as done ([i386] [20040321] [netinst] general success)
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:58:18 +0200 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line Processed: Bug#241757: general success has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Apr 2004 19:25:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Apr 02 11:25:46 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from ms-smtp-01.texas.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-eri0.texas.rr.com) [24.93.47.40] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1B9UIU-0004sX-00; Fri, 02 Apr 2004 11:25:46 -0800 Received: from 192.168.1.101 (cs2417411-36.houston.rr.com [24.174.11.36]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.texas.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id i32JPelK020182 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:25:41 -0600 (CST) From: Michael Satterwhite [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Installation Report Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 13:25:39 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: clearsigned data Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: =2DBEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 03/21/04 uname -a:=20 Date: 04/02/2004 Method: NetInstall. Booted from CDROM. Installed from ftp.us.debian.org= =20 Machine: Dell Inspiron 4000 Processor: Pentium III Memory: 256MB Root Device: Root Device IDE. Partitioned: /boot 189M swap 512M / 8.8G Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] [O] =3D OK, [E] =3D Error (please elaborate below), [ ] =3D didn't try it Comments/Problems: At completion of the installation, I had an error stating that not all=20 packages had installed. On closer examination, I found that I had the error= =20 message that my kernel is configured with devfs, but devfs is not mounted=20 anywhere. As this is the kernel being retrieved from the server, there is a= n=20 inconsistency. Either the retrieved kernel should *NOT* be configured with= =20 devfs or the installation process should create a correct mount for devfs. =2DBEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2-rc1-SuSE (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAbb4zjeziQOokQnARAjXmAJ4ruTQltLiSOcUG1iNbEW8EvCY/BACfWPHN 1gjHoIGJZsOtcz7RTVWtfKY=3D =3DX3VL =2DEND PGP SIGNATURE- --- Received: (at 241757-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2004 20:57:15 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 30 13:57:15 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cpe.atm0-0-0-2421032.0x3ef2dbfa.arcnxx7.customer.tele.dk (host.kl-teknik.com) [62.242.219.250] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BqeRH-0006OW-00; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:57:15 -0700 Received: from mail.thepenguininvasion.dk (0x5358aaae.abnxx12.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [:::83.88.170.174]) (AUTH: PLAIN [EMAIL PROTECTED]) by host.kl-teknik.com with esmtp; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 23:02:18 +0200 id 3F16.410AB75B.1A80 From: Frederik Dannemare [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Michael Satterwhite [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Processed: Bug#241757: general success Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 22:58:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: =2DBEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, first and foremost: thank you
Bug#262387: hppa b180 success
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: http://people.debian.org/~jbailey/d-i/hppa/daily/boot.img uname -a: Linux caradhras 2.4.26-32-smp #1 SMP Sun Jun 20 20:45:33 CEST 2004 parisc GNU/Linux Date: July 28, 2004. Method: netboot from local tftpd Machine: HP B180L+ Processor: Merlin L2+ 180 (9000/778/B180L) (0) at 0xfffbe000 [62], versions 0x504, 0x0, 0x4 Memory: 416M Root Device: SCSI /dev/sda Root Size/partition table: Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1 31 31728 f0 Linux/PA-RISC boot /dev/sda2 32 275 249856 82 Linux swap /dev/sda3 * 2761740 1500160 83 Linux /dev/sda417414091 2407424 83 Linux sda3 is /, sda4 is /home Output of lspci: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci :00:13.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c875 (rev 04) :00:14.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21142/43 (rev 41) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: Worked fine, once again. Will try a cd install tomorrow. System had mdetect installed, which tried to pull in read-edid, which obviously didn't work. Cheers, -- Kyle McMartin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 262270 to nobootloader ...
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 reassign 262270 nobootloader Bug#262270: Installation Report (AMD64) Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `nobootloader'. retitle 262270 failed to use sed from installed system w/o chrooting into it Bug#262270: Installation Report (AMD64) Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 261722 to xserver-xfree86, retitle 261722 to problem configuring X
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 reassign 261722 xserver-xfree86 Bug#261722: installation-reports Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `xserver-xfree86'. retitle 261722 problem configuring X Bug#261722: installation-reports Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262387: marked as done (hppa b180 success)
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:15:51 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line thanks for your report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2004 20:51:46 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 30 13:51:46 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from cpe0030ab0b413b-cm023469906297.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com (mcmartin.ca) [24.157.3.237] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BqeLy-0006Cb-00; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 13:51:46 -0700 Received: by mcmartin.ca (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 32CE5ECF2; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:51:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 16:51:41 -0400 From: Kyle McMartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: hppa b180 success Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: http://people.debian.org/~jbailey/d-i/hppa/daily/boot.img uname -a: Linux caradhras 2.4.26-32-smp #1 SMP Sun Jun 20 20:45:33 CEST 2004 parisc GNU/Linux Date: July 28, 2004. Method: netboot from local tftpd Machine: HP B180L+ Processor: Merlin L2+ 180 (9000/778/B180L) (0) at 0xfffbe000 [62], versions 0x504, 0x0, 0x4 Memory: 416M Root Device: SCSI /dev/sda Root Size/partition table: Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/sda1 1 31 31728 f0 Linux/PA-RISC boot /dev/sda2 32 275 249856 82 Linux swap /dev/sda3 * 2761740 1500160 83 Linux /dev/sda417414091 2407424 83 Linux sda3 is /, sda4 is /home Output of lspci: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci :00:13.0 SCSI storage controller: LSI Logic / Symbios Logic 53c875 (rev 04) :00:14.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21142/43 (rev 41) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: Worked fine, once again. Will try a cd install tomorrow. System had mdetect installed, which tried to pull in read-edid, which obviously didn't work. Cheers, -- Kyle McMartin --- Received: (at 262387-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2004 21:15:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 30 14:15:33 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bqeiz-000765-00; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:15:33 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B717917E02 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:15:31 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6B75382CEA; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:15:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:15:51 -0400 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: thanks for your report Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Processed: reassign 261527 to netcfg
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 reassign 261527 netcfg Bug#261527: no subject Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `netcfg'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 261571 to partman, tagging 261571, retitle 261571 to three partman problems
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 reassign 261571 partman Bug#261571: installation-report Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `partman'. tags 261571 d-i Bug#261571: installation-report There were no tags set. Tags added: d-i retitle 261571 three partman problems Bug#261571: installation-report Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#262387: hppa b180 success
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: reopen 262387 Bug#262387: hppa b180 success Bug reopened, originator not changed. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: retitle 261527 to loop in manual coniguration
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 retitle 261527 loop in manual coniguration Bug#261527: no subject Changed Bug title. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
solicito ayuda
México D.F. a 30 de julio del 2004 A quien corresponda: Por medio de la presente quiero manifestar lo siguiente: Soy un ciudadano que desea lo mejor para sus hijos. Y en ese animo estoy convencido que el DEL INSTITUTO POLITECNICO NACIONAL es la mejor opción educativa en todo los niveles que imparte. Y lo digo por que yo soy orgulloso egresado de ese instituto. Mis dos primeras hijas están inscritas en ya el INSTITUTO POLITECNICO NACIONAL Y mi mayor deseo es que mi tercera hija también se integre al Politécnico Mi hija egresada con promedio de 8.8 del nivel secundario fue rechazada en sus primeras opciones que apuntaban todas a planteles del INSTITUTO POLITECNICO NACIONAL resultando su puntuación insuficiente cosa que no deja de hacerme sospechar algún mal manejo en cuanto a los procedimientos del COMIPEMS para la evaluación de examen único.. y animado por el derecho que tengo de escoger para mis hijos la mejor opción educativa y dado las barreras burocraticas puestas para desalentar cualquier incorformidad y en base a lo estipulado en la LEY ORGANICA DEL INSTITUTO POLITECNICO NACIONAL Que señala en su articulo: ARTICULO 3.-Son finalidades del Instituto Politécnico Nacional: I.-Contribuir a través del proceso educativo a la transformación de la sociedad en un sentido democrático y de progreso social, para lograr la justa distribución de los bienes materiales y culturales dentro de un régimen de igualdad y libertad. Y el párrafo: VII.-Garantizar y ampliar el acceso de estudiantes de escasos recursos a todos los servicios de la enseñanza técnica que preste el instituto. Solicito a usted ayuda para lograr la inscripcion de mi hija en el INSTITUTO POLITECNICO NACIONAL en el nivel medio superior en el plantel Walter Cross Buchanan Los datos de mi hija son los siguientes: Nombre: Maricela Rojo Sandoval Folio del concurso de ingreso s la educación media superior: 380808952 CURP: ROSM890417MSLJNR Por la atención que se sirva dar a la presente le quede de antemano profundamente agradecido. Atentamente: Javier Rojo Vargas Mis datos para cualquier respuesta o duda son los siguentes. Dirección Av. Pantitlan 18 col. El porvenir cd. Nezahualcoyotl Edo. De México Tel: 57 00 48 34 Correo electrónico [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#261482: marked as done (installation report: reboot 'hangs')
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:38:53 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line your report has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jul 2004 09:36:20 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jul 26 02:36:20 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from smtp30.hccnet.nl [62.251.0.40] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bp1u8-0006w2-00; Mon, 26 Jul 2004 02:36:20 -0700 Received: from x by smtp30.hccnet.nl via uds253-44.dial.hccnet.nl [62.251.44.253] with SMTP for [EMAIL PROTECTED] id i6Q9ZmRA007536 (8.12.10/2.05); Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:35:48 +0200 (MEST) Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: John Beining [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: installation report: reboot 'hangs' Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:30:28 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_30,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 20040701 ftp.debian.org Date: 20050725 Method: boot from floppy, network (wireless) install from ftp.debian.org Machine: Toshiba Satellite Pro 440CDT Processor: Pentium 133MHz Memory: 32Mb Root Device: IDE Root Size/partition table: #1prim50.0 MBB Fext2/boot #2sec1.2 GB Fext3/ #3sec102.6 MB Fswap Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [E] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: At Reboot machine 'hangs': Saving installation logs to /var/log/debian-installer/... E: Unimplemented function Then after an 'reboot' from shell, there is no directory /var/log/debian-installer. --- Received: (at 261482-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2004 21:38:28 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 30 14:38:28 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bqf5A-xU-00; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:38:28 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD8117F9B; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:38:28 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B763882CEA; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:38:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:38:53 -0400 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: John Beining [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: your report Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,YOUTHERE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: --tKW2IUtsqtDRztdT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Debian-installer-version: 20040701 ftp.debian.org Date: 20050725 Method: boot from floppy, network (wireless) install from ftp.debian.org This means that there are 24 days of changes between the floppy images you used and the rest of the installer they downloaded over the
Bug#261593: info
The problem with tasksel installing too much has been fixed today. I suppose the only remaining problem in this report is no dsl automatic config. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#262387: hppa b180 success
reopen 262387 thanks Kyle McMartin wrote: System had mdetect installed, which tried to pull in read-edid, which obviously didn't work. I missed this when I closed the report before. How didn't it work? /var/log/base-config.log should have a log of whatever happened. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#261451: marked as done (S/390 Installation Report)
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:29:47 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Jul 2004 02:57:27 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 25 19:57:27 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from sine.sctelecom.com (mailbox.sinenomine.net) [192.204.203.218] by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bovg7-ZO-00; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 19:57:27 -0700 Received: from localhost (mailbox.sinenomine.net [192.168.101.9]) by mailbox.sinenomine.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/SuSE Linux 0.6) with ESMTP id i6Q2vNjb004661 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 22:57:24 -0400 Subject: S/390 Installation Report From: Adam Thornton [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Sine Nomine Associates Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.4 Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 21:58:11 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS - amavis-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: Built from svn 25 July 2004 1900:00 (or so) -0500 uname -a: Linux di 2.4.26-1-s390 #1 SMP Sun Apr 25 16:48:39 CEST 2004 s390 GNU/Linux Date: 25 July 2004 21:15 -0500 Method: IPL from virtual reader. Installed unstable from ftp.debian.org. IUCV network this time. Machine: IBM Multiprise 3000 H70 Processor: S/390 Memory: 64M virtual machine Root Device: 1000-cylinder (700 MB) minidisk at address 0150 Root Size/partition table: di:~# cat /etc/fstab; df # /etc/fstab: static file system information. # # file system mount point type options dump pass /dev/dasda1 / ext3defaults,errors=remount-ro 0 1 /dev/dasdb1 /home ext3defaults0 2 /dev/dasdc1 noneswapsw 0 0 /dev/floppy/0 /floppy autorw,user,noauto 0 0 /dev/cdroms/cdrom0 /cdrom autoro,user,noauto 0 0 proc/proc procdefaults0 0 Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/dasda1 708568157964514612 24% / tmpfs30684 0 30684 0% /dev/shm /dev/dasdb1 348608 16440314176 5% /home Output of lspci and lspci -n: n/a Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [O] (none other than network drivers) Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [ ] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] (manual, peculiarity of architecture) Comments/Problems: The FSM module comments that it will taint the kernel, since it has no license. As it's derived from the GPL isdn4linux FSM, it too is presumably GPL, so we might want to fix this. I'll add it to my open kernel bug. Now CTC, IUCV, and qeth have all been tested and work. Install logs and other status info is available in /var/log/debian-installer/. Once you have filled out this report, mail it to [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Received: (at 261451-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2004 21:36:34 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 30 14:36:34 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bqf3K-da-00; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:36:34 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D0CD186B1 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:29:17 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D9F2E82CEA; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:29:47 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:29:47 -0400 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To:
Bug#261371: marked as done (install report: amd64 works ok)
Your message dated Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:29:14 -0400 with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED] and subject line closing has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Jul 2004 16:04:47 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jul 25 09:04:47 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from keg.cs.vu.nl [130.37.24.4] (root) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1BolUV-JI-00; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 09:04:47 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by keg.cs.vu.nl with esmtp (Smail #91) id m1BolUT-00020EC; Sun, 25 Jul 2004 18:04 +0200 Date: Sun, 25 Jul 2004 18:04:45 +0200 (CEST) From: Thomas J. Zeeman [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: install report: amd64 works ok Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25 X-Spam-Level: Package: installation-reports INSTALL REPORT Debian-installer-version: 20040724 daily build from debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images uname -a: Linux carrington 2.6.7-5-amd64-xeon #1 SMP Thu Jul 15 00:27:37 CEST 2004 x86_64 GNU/Linux Date: 20040725 Method: A netboot install from debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64/. No proxy. Machine: Homebrew based on an Asus K8V SE deluxe mobo Processor: AMD Athlon 64 3200+ Memory: 512MB Root Device: hde6 Root Size/partition table: hde1 ntfs40G win xp hde3 ext320G debian i386 hde4 ext34G debian i386 hde6 ext34G debian amd64/ hde5 lvm 125G 1 music xfs 60G 2 home xfs 45G /home 3 opt xfs 10G /chroot 4 swap swap Output of lspci and lspci -n: Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] Comments/Problems: The install went ok. There are two points I do want to note however. First, the windows partition wasn't detected by os-prober. A previous install with a i386 d-i image did find it. Most likely caused by the ntfs module being absent. Second, although I have an AMD cpu d-i installed an Intel Xeon kernel-image. It does boot and seems to be working good enough to install an k8 kernel-image. In the logs I found a note that the installer didn't know what the amd64 architecture was and it looked like it just defaulted to the first non-netboot kernel it could find. regards, Thomas -- Human civilization is not something achieved against nature; it is rather the outcome of the working of the innate qualities of man. -- Ludwig von Mises --- Received: (at 261371-done) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Jul 2004 21:36:33 + From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jul 30 14:36:33 2004 Return-path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix) by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian)) id 1Bqf3J-dJ-00; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 14:36:33 -0700 Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (unknown [66.168.94.144]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN Joey Hess, Issuer Joey Hess (verified OK)) by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7552A18536 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 21:28:52 + (GMT) Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5670882CEA; Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:29:15 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2004 17:29:14 -0400 From: Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: closing Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol=application/pgp-signature; boundary=mP3DRpeJDSE+ciuQ Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin
Bug#241516: partial success on Oldworld powermac
Thanks for the reminder. You can close this bug report. The ask for floppy driver module twice (and not fined it at all bug is still present, but I've mentioned it in other bug reports that reference more current CD images, so there's no need for this one. Enjoy! Rick On Friday, July 30, 2004, at 04:31 PM, Frederik Dannemare wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, first and foremost: thank you for your bug report. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241516 I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you reported some problems back in April, I would very much appreciate it, if you could find time to download and test the latest[1] cd image and confirm whether you still see the problems you've mentioned. If you can confirm they are no longer present, I will close this report. Much has changed with the installer since April, and it is not unlikely that these problems may have been dealt with by the Debian Developers working on the installer. Looking forward to hearing from you again. Thank you for your time. [1]http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/ - -- Frederik Dannemare | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8 http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBCrAdLSX61ZxOtagRAhZJAJ9CF+bCZe4akhhI5tZTtS7m/TStXQCeJo3s uHfEd49EBvlh564oRvuvTK4= =4kHd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262410: Installer bug report
Package: installation-reports Debian-installer-version: 2004-07-29 current from http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/i386/ uname -a: Linux enoch.gear.dyndns.org 2.6.7-1-386 #1 Thu Jul 8 05:08:04 EDT 2004 i686 unknown Date: 2004-07-30 19:30 AEST Method: How did you install? From CD What did you boot off? From netboot CD If network install, from where? ftp.premium.planetmirror.com Proxied? No Machine: Gigabyte GA-7N400Pro m/b Processor: Athlon XP 2400+ Memory: 512 Mb DDR Root Device: SATA hde: WDC WD2000JD-00GBB0, ATA DISK drive hdg: WDC WD2000JD-00GBB0, ATA DISK drive Root Size/partition table: hde:hde1 1 Gb Linux RAID autodetect hde2 4 Gb Linux RAID autodetect hde3 195 Gb Linux RAID autodetect hdg:Same as hde Output of lspci: :00:00.0 Host bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AGP (different version?) (rev c1) :00:00.1 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 1 (rev c1) :00:00.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 4 (rev c1) :00:00.3 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 3 (rev c1) :00:00.4 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 2 (rev c1) :00:00.5 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation nForce2 Memory Controller 5 (rev c1) :00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 ISA Bridge (rev a4) :00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation nForce2 SMBus (MCP) (rev a2) :00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4) :00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4) :00:02.2 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 USB Controller (rev a4) :00:05.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation nForce MultiMedia audio [Via VT82C686B] (rev a2) :00:06.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AC97 Audio Controler (MCP) (rev a1) :00:08.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 External PCI Bridge (rev a3) :00:09.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation nForce2 IDE (rev a2) :00:1e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation nForce2 AGP (rev c1) :01:07.0 SCSI storage controller: Adaptec AIC-7861 (rev 01) :01:08.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) :01:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) :01:0c.0 RAID bus controller: Integrated Technology Express, Inc. IT/ITE8212 Dual channel ATA RAID controller (PCI version seems to be IT8212, embedded seems (rev 10) :03:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV18 [GeForce4 MX 440 AGP 8x] (rev a2) Base System Installation Checklist: Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [E] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[E] Reboot: [O] [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Comments/Problems: (Please read the following criticism as constructive, not flaming.) When mounting the partitions, it gave me a warning that /boot and / are not supported on software RAID. I proceeded anyway, and it didn't install GRUB or LILO correctly, and won't boot. RED HAT HAVE SUPPORTED THIS SINCE RED HAT 7.3, including LVM since 8.0! Fedora Core 2 installs perfectly on this system. Please do something about this - it is a serious problem. Low end servers nearly always come with two ATA or SATA drives (i've bought 6 of them from Dell Acer in the past year at work). A two-drive setup with RAID 1 mirroring is *essential* to support for any production server. This has saved me so many times when drives have failed - without RAID 1, the system will crash and need to be restored from backup, whereas with it, people don't even notice a drive has failed. (BTW, please don't suggest hardware RAID as a solution to this. The above system is a home workstation for which i need to be able to swap drives to other systems if a motherboard or power supply fails. Linux software RAID is the most effective way to achieve mirroring portably across a wide range of hardware.) I really want to convert to Debian - i am convinced of its value in the package management area, and i strongly agree with its social contract, but these sort of limitations are show-stoppers. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#241133: fails at boot
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 10:19:44PM +0200, Frederik Dannemare wrote: first and foremost: thank you for your bug report. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=241133 I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you reported some problems back in March, I would very much appreciate it, if you could find time to download and test the latest[1] cd image and confirm whether you still see the problems you've mentioned. If you can confirm they are no longer present, I will close this report. Will do the next couple of days. I'm very lucky to have acess to the machine again. I haven't had it since when I filed the report (studying in England, machine was at home-Belgium). But now I need some sleep, just returned form holiday! Floris -- Debian GNU/Linux -- The power of freedom www.debian.org | www.gnu.org | www.kernel.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: r18730 - trunk/packages/rootskel/src/sbin
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 12:41:03PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote: On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 11:38:46AM +0200, Wouter Verhelst wrote: Busybox init tries to access those devices over and over again, issueing an error message every time it fails. Ah, okay. Please open a bug against busybox-cvs. That should indeed happen, but right now it's worked around; and I don't think we should go tamper with busybox init so close to a release. -- EARTH smog | bricks AIR -- mud -- FIRE soda water | tequila WATER -- with thanks to fortune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: reassign 262387 to base-config
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.7.95.1 reassign 262387 base-config Bug#262387: hppa b180 success Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `base-config'. End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262387: hppa b180 success
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 05:43:31PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: reopen 262387 thanks I missed this when I closed the report before. How didn't it work? /var/log/base-config.log should have a log of whatever happened. read-edid is only available in i386. Cheers, -- Kyle McMartin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262387: hppa b180 success
Kyle McMartin wrote: On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 05:43:31PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: reopen 262387 thanks I missed this when I closed the report before. How didn't it work? /var/log/base-config.log should have a log of whatever happened. read-edid is only available in i386. Since base-config 2.37 that should only result in a warning message and mdetect should still be installed; before that mdetect would not be installed if read-edid was not available. Any particular problem with how it works now, besides perhaps being ugly? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#262387: hppa b180 success
On Fri, Jul 30, 2004 at 08:36:03PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: Since base-config 2.37 that should only result in a warning message and mdetect should still be installed; before that mdetect would not be installed if read-edid was not available. Any particular problem with how it works now, besides perhaps being ugly? Ahh, you're right, it was only a warning, my bad. Cheers -- Kyle McMartin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
still no c,h,s
Dear boot friends, I still cannot do the following at first screen: expert26 hd=7296,255,63 and end up with the right geometry in the partion section. When I choose, show c,h,s information, it still gives the info based upon the 16 sectors. Am I doing something wrong? The help says it will allow this parameter to be passed. best, M -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#262464: Failure - HP Vectra 4/66 w P83 OD Processor
Package: installation-reportsDebian-installer-version: 7/24/2004, debian.uchicago.eduuname -a: Unable.Date: 7/30/2004 @ 2317CDTMethod: Floppy install w/ Net-DriversMachine: HP Vectra 4/66Processor: P83 ODPMemory: 64MBRoot Device: IDE 17.2GBRoot Size/partition table: 1GB /, 16GB /homeOutput of lspci: UnknownBase System Installation Checklist:Initial boot worked: [O]Configure network HW: [O]Config network: [O]Detect CD: [ ]Load installer modules: [O]Detect hard drives: [E]Partition hard drives: [O]Create file systems: [O]Mount partitions: [O]Install base system: [E]Install boot loader: [ ]Reboot: [ ][O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try itComments/Problems:Encounter problems in one of two places:Either setup stalls detecting IDE-modules (80%)OrSystem stalls when installing the base system. Get errors that the archive is no longer valid or that the network is down. Suspect that the NIC driver modules are lost in the process of downloading and installing debian-base. Tried installing 3.0 from floppy, but driver-4 disk is corrupted. Unable to make another at this time. -- R. Seiji www.arslist.info
Introduction
Hi, This is probably as good a place to start introducing myself eh ? :) I'm James Mills (aged: 22) of Australia, QLD. I am currently studying Software Engineering at Griffith University. I have now used Debian for almost 4 years and run various Debian Routers, Servers and Desktop machines (only on Intel based systems). I have experience/skills in the following areas: * Programming (C, Pascal, ObjPascal, Python, PHP) and quite a few other (not frequently used languages). * Project work (currently involved in a year long university project for an outside client) * Tools: vim, cvs, subversion, sed, grep, etc... Fairly familer with most command-line/curses based applications. That's about it I guess, anything else would be non-related to Debian GNU/Linux. I do intend to get involved with the Development of Debian, I guess this is one of the first steps... What's the process of contributing to the Debian Installer project ? Are there SubVersion credentials to obtain ? Look forward to working with you all, cheers James -- -ShortCircuit Services -WIKI: http://wiki.shortcircuit.net.au -IRC: http://wiki.shortcircuit.net.au/IRC/ -IRC: (/server shortcircuit.net.au) - -Problems are Solved by Method - -Team123 - We deliver -URL: http://team123.shortcircuit.net.au -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
