partman-crypto_12_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-09-11 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
partman-crypto-dm_12_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-dm_12_all.udeb
partman-crypto-loop_12_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-loop_12_all.udeb
partman-crypto_12.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_12.dsc
partman-crypto_12.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_12.tar.gz
partman-crypto_12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_12_i386.udeb


Override entries for your package:
partman-crypto-dm_12_all.udeb - standard debian-installer
partman-crypto-loop_12_all.udeb - standard debian-installer
partman-crypto_12.dsc - source debian-installer
partman-crypto_12_i386.udeb - standard debian-installer

Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 385927 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



partman-crypto override disparity

2006-09-11 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

partman-crypto-dm_12_all.udeb: package says priority is optional, override says 
standard.
partman-crypto-loop_12_all.udeb: package says priority is optional, override 
says standard.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why.

[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one
like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore
this mail.  Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in
due course, but until then the installer will send these automated
mails; sorry.]

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#385927: marked as done (debian-installer: Swap over LVM over crypt not allowed)

2006-09-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 10 Sep 2006 23:02:12 -0700
with message-id [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and subject line Bug#385927: fixed in partman-crypto 12
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

---BeginMessage---
Package: debian-installer
Severity: important


Installed using latest daily D-I netinst.  I tried to create the 
following structure:

sda (ext3 /boot, crypt (lvm (ext3 /, swap) ) )

That is, root/swap on top of LVM on top of crypt.  However, D-I is a 
little too smart for itself, detected that a swap partition was being 
created that wasn't directly on a crypt partition, gave a Unsafe swap 
space detected error, and refused to proceed.  However, this particular 
configuration is not unsafe, but D-I doesn't realize that because of the 
LVM layer between crypt and swap.

I was able to proceed by adding a second crypt layer:

sda (ext3 /boot, crypt (lvm (ext3 /, crypt (swap) ) ) )

But D-I should be smart enough to realize that crypt is already present 
farther up the tree.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.16-2-486
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)

---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: partman-crypto
Source-Version: 12

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
partman-crypto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

partman-crypto-dm_12_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-dm_12_all.udeb
partman-crypto-loop_12_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-loop_12_all.udeb
partman-crypto_12.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_12.dsc
partman-crypto_12.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_12.tar.gz
partman-crypto_12_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_12_i386.udeb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED],
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Max Vozeler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (supplier of updated partman-crypto package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.7
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 07:47:49 +0200
Source: partman-crypto
Binary: partman-crypto-dm partman-crypto partman-crypto-loop
Architecture: source i386 all
Version: 12
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org
Changed-By: Max Vozeler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Description: 
 partman-crypto - Add to partman support for block device encryption (udeb)
 partman-crypto-dm - Add to partman support for dm-crypt encryption (udeb)
 partman-crypto-loop - Add to partman support for loop-AES encryption (udeb)
Closes: 385927
Changes: 
 partman-crypto (12) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   [ David Härdeman ]
   * Allow swap-on-lvm-on-crypto. Closes: 385927
 .
   [ Updated translations ]
   * Danish (da.po) by Claus Hindsgaul
   * Spanish (es.po) by Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña
   * Basque (eu.po) by Piarres Beobide
   * Galician (gl.po) by Jacobo Tarrio
   * Hebrew (he.po) by Lior Kaplan
   * Lithuanian (lt.po) by Kęstutis Biliūnas
   * Latvian (lv.po) by Aigars Mahinovs
   * Norwegian Bokmål (nb.po) by Bjørn Steensrud
   * Dutch (nl.po) by Bart Cornelis
   * Slovenian (sl.po) by Jure Čuhalev
   * Thai (th.po) by Theppitak Karoonboonyanan
   * Turkish (tr.po) by Recai Oktaş
   * Vietnamese (vi.po) by Clytie Siddall
   * Wolof (wo.po) by Mouhamadou Mamoune Mbacke
Files: 
 108670fb928ec6e3e4c2238dc36b1871 609 debian-installer standard 
partman-crypto_12.dsc
 cc21f96d2b0d95d220515438a912bb14 232219 debian-installer standard 
partman-crypto_12.tar.gz
 5fe205e1e811c2525fb2e26bf26f8cb8 1372 debian-installer optional 
partman-crypto-dm_12_all.udeb
 92231e2159d2f6beee418d2938e60f96 1242 debian-installer optional 
partman-crypto-loop_12_all.udeb
 979742d9decefff447c85659afeeac75 178402 debian-installer standard 
partman-crypto_12_i386.udeb
Package-Type: udeb

-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFFBPpTnVvVEbfNotwRAi/uAJ9RuTb8vyWzunPFLhsGBdRR2gpDCQCg39mr
lLYavVlFIJxXy6RHwMp0uYs=
=w6yF

Processing of partman-crypto_12_i386.changes

2006-09-11 Thread Archive Administrator
partman-crypto_12_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-crypto_12.dsc
  partman-crypto_12.tar.gz
  partman-crypto-dm_12_all.udeb
  partman-crypto-loop_12_all.udeb
  partman-crypto_12_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [g-i] patch for the lines problem

2006-09-11 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti

Davide Viti wrote:

A bit of history:

a problem [1] with Italic letters near the borders which was fixed
upstream; the fix caused some problems which can be seen in [2] and
was noticed when g-i switched to the 2.8.x set of libraries.

Upstream version of gtk+ is currently 2.10.3, and according to Mike
Emmel, upstream author of the gtk-directfb backend, it'd be
non-trivial to backport the fixes to 2.18.x libraries.

There are two options:

1. switch to 2.10.3 libraries 


please note that while GTK+ 2.10.2 should compile correctly, current GTK 
in cvs ( and 2.10.3 too, IIRC) won't because it needs something like the 
attached patch that mike should be applying in days.
I think GTK+ 2.10.2 is a good choice (2.10.1 had some issues, while 
2.10.3 may not compile without the patch) for g-i, i feel backporting 
patches to 2.0.9 or 2.8.x would be a real pain.


friendly

Attilio

Index: gdkwindow-directfb.c
===
RCS file: /cvs/gnome/gtk+/gdk/directfb/gdkwindow-directfb.c,v
retrieving revision 1.10
diff -r1.10 gdkwindow-directfb.c
2996c2996
   gdk_display_beep (GDK_WINDOW_DISPLAY (window));
---
   g_warning (gdk_window_beep() not implemented.\n);


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: RFC: countrychooser and IP location

2006-09-11 Thread Eddy Petrişor

On 10/09/06, Joey Hess [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Robert Millan wrote:
 +iplocated_country=`wget -q http://api.hostip.info/country.php -O - | head -c 
2`

This is a third-party point of failure. Altough your code does
gracefully degrade if it fails. Would Debian be able to run this service
itself if we decided to use this? Or would that be a bad idea? Just
curious.


Wasn't geoip[1][ supposed to be something which did some location -
IP association?


Anyway, I rather like the idea of doing IP location, but I lean more
toward only using the info to override the user's country in mirror
selection, rather than overriding the whole countrychooser. For one
thing, it wouldn't need to ask the user an insulting question (do you
know what country you're in?) if the iplocated country was only used to
change the default mirror.


[1] http://packages.debian.org/unstable/net/geoip-bin

--
Regards,
EddyP
=
Imagination is more important than knowledge A.Einstein


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Character set messed in iso-codes_iso_3166_fi.po

2006-09-11 Thread Tapio Lehtonen
It looks to me that character encoding in the file
  iso-codes_iso_3166_fi.po
is somehow messed up. I failed to figure out how to 
fix it.

Can the file be checked out from version control somehow? Localization
guide talks about CVS and provides svn link that does not seem to
work.

-- 
Tapio Lehtonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.iki.fi/tapio.lehtonen


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Character set messed in iso-codes_iso_3166_fi.po

2006-09-11 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Tapio Lehtonen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 It looks to me that character encoding in the file
   iso-codes_iso_3166_fi.po
 is somehow messed up. I failed to figure out how to 
 fix it.
 
 Can the file be checked out from version control somehow? Localization
 guide talks about CVS and provides svn link that does not seem to
 work.


Should better be discussed with iso-codes maintainers

I'm not very keen about anonymous SVN checkout URLs.

Please have a look at
svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-isocodes/trunk/iso-codes




signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#382990: etch beta 3 on SparcStation 20

2006-09-11 Thread Hendrik Sattler
Am Sonntag 10 September 2006 00:35 schrieb Jurij Smakov:
 Did you make any progress on this? It turned out that it was not easy for
 me to prevent automatic spin-up of disks on power-up, so I could not
 reproduce this problem. Please try installing using the latest dailies and
 let me know if the problem still persists.

Still no go :-(
I used the daily netinst from 2006-09-11.

I solved the disk spinup with jumpers on the disk, two disk are now correctly 
found.

However, mounting the CD-ROM fails with the following message:
kernel: isofs_fill_super: bread failed, dev=sr0, iso_blknum=16, block=16

Same if I insert the Etch beta3 at this point.

HS


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



New cdebconf facility allowing simpler translated choices

2006-09-11 Thread Colin Watson
I've added this feature to cdebconf in trunk:

  * Allow Choices-C to be listed separately from Choices (etc.) in templates
files. This lets you say Choices: ${CHOICES-TRANS} and Choices-C:
${CHOICES} to substitute reliably into translated and untranslated
templates without having to ensure that ${CHOICES-TRANS} is translated
to the same thing in every language.

(Note that this will not be available until cdebconf 0.106 is built and
daily initrd builds are refreshed to include it.)

To take an example, here's a template from kbd-chooser:

  Template: console-tools/archs
  Type: select
  # Translators, always translate with ${KBD-ARCHS-L10N}
  _Choices: ${KBD-ARCHS}
  _Description: Type of keyboard:
   Please choose the type of keyboard to configure.

In practice, this is unreliable: translators don't always manage 100%
accuracy on preserving the specified translated text, and we have to go
around fixing things up afterwards (see e.g. r40291). Also, all the
Choices-* fields take up valuable space. With cdebconf 0.106, you can do
the following instead:

  Template: console-tools/archs
  Type: select
  Choices-C: ${KBD-ARCHS}
  Choices: ${KBD-ARCHS-L10N}
  _Description: Type of keyboard:
   Please choose the type of keyboard to configure.

(This will cause a lintian warning at present, but that will be fixed in
lintian 1.23.25.)

Please let me know about any problems caused by this; I don't always
reliably keep up with debian-boot, so it might be worth poking me on
IRC.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson   [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#387019: my eyes hurt

2006-09-11 Thread Gurkan Sengun

Package: debian-installer
Version: etch
Severity: wishlist

Please can these points be improved in the graphical debian-installer?
- The shadows make the debian logo incosistent to all the other 
occurences

  where they are without shadow (corporate design)
- the text GNU/Linux should be bold
- Bottom clickable buttons are not aligned to the other gui elements

I've got a gimp picture of the improvements needed here:
http://io.debian.net/~tar/hebrew-bad.png
http://io.debian.net/~tar/hebrew-improved.xcf

Yours,
Guerkan



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#387019: my eyes hurt

2006-09-11 Thread Attilio Fiandrotti

Gurkan Sengun wrote:

/snip


- Bottom clickable buttons are not aligned to the other gui elements


i belive you have a very old ISO: the screenshot button is not displayed 
at all and select options are displayed LTR, while with recent GTKDFB 
2.8.x libs strings are correctly RTL displayed.
Could you please try downloading a recent g-i iso and verify the 
alignment of buttons?


Attilio


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#387019: my eyes hurt

2006-09-11 Thread Frans Pop
reassign 387019 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
severity 387019 minor
retitle 387019 Theming issues with graphical installer
thanks

I guess we really should make sure that the theming is consistent with 
Debian house style now g-i has been integrated and will be part of Etch.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Processed: Re: Bug#387019: my eyes hurt

2006-09-11 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 reassign 387019 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
Bug#387019: my eyes hurt
Bug reassigned from package `debian-installer' to `cdebconf-gtk-udeb'.

 severity 387019 minor
Bug#387019: my eyes hurt
Severity set to `minor' from `wishlist'

 retitle 387019 Theming issues with graphical installer
Bug#387019: my eyes hurt
Changed Bug title.

 thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



[g-i] new screenshots available (dejavu 2.9)

2006-09-11 Thread Davide Viti
I've taken some screenshots as it was done a while ago (see [1])
hoping that your comments can help improving fonts quality for
Debian and in particular for the new graphical installer.

Since the last survey, this is the list of major changes:

 * graphic libraries have been updated
 * default fontsize has been increased
 * dejavu2.9 has been used (last time we used 2.7)
 * #374902 was fixed with a new upload of libfreetype6-udeb_2.2.1-4_i386.udeb

the screenshots can be found in [2], and in case you wanted to compare them to 
the
previous, see [3]

feedback is very welcome
regards,

Davide

[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/06/msg01178.html
[3] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/20060911_dejavu2.9/
[3] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/20060621_dejavu2.7/


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: [g-i] new screenshots available (dejavu 2.9)

2006-09-11 Thread Davide Viti
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:06:45PM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:

  * #374902 was fixed with a new upload of libfreetype6-udeb_2.2.1-4_i386.udeb

libfreetype6-udeb_2.2.1-4

 
 the screenshots can be found in [2], and in case you wanted to compare them 
 to the
 previous, see [3]
 
 feedback is very welcome
 regards,
 
 Davide
 
 [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/06/msg01178.html
 [3] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/20060911_dejavu2.9/

[2] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/20060911_dejavu2.9/
of course

 [3] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/20060621_dejavu2.7/


regards,
Davide


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: [g-i] patch for the lines problem

2006-09-11 Thread Davide Viti
On Sun, Sep 10, 2006 at 09:57:15PM +0200, Loïc Minier wrote:
 tag 386860 + pending confirmed upstream
 stop
 
 On Sun, Sep 10, 2006, Davide Viti wrote:
   the decision has to be made by the gnome team, responsable also of the
   udebs used with g-i. Don't know if it's going to happen before Etch is
   released
 
  We would really love to; I think it's going to be a tight race, so we
  need to consider both options.
 
  2. revert the patch needed to fix [1]
   this would involve a new upload of gtk+2.0, which should include a patch
   to fix the problem with horizontal/vertical lines.
   I tested and prepared a patch which fixes the problem (see [3])
 
  Thanks, I've added the patch to our SVN for the unstable branch
  and it will be part of next upload.  (Since gtk is a big package and
  it's the only change right now, I'm waiting to gather more fixes.)
 

finger crossed; thanx for the update.

regards,
Davide


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processing of partman-crypto_13_i386.changes

2006-09-11 Thread Archive Administrator
partman-crypto_13_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  partman-crypto_13.dsc
  partman-crypto_13.tar.gz
  partman-crypto-dm_13_all.udeb
  partman-crypto-loop_13_all.udeb
  partman-crypto_13_i386.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [g-i] new screenshots available (dejavu 2.9)

2006-09-11 Thread Davide Viti
Hi Lior,

On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 11:42:19PM +0300, Lior Kaplan wrote:
 Hi,
 
 Hebrew looks fine. thanks.

good; Hebrew is still using glyphs out of freefont.
Hebrew glyphs have just been included in dejavu: any chance you can give some
feedback about it? I'll try to get some screenshots to compare them in the next
days

 
 How did you take these screen shots? I'd like to do something similar to
 help people test debian installer.
 

see the instruction at the bottom of [1] (Creating screenshots section)

regards,
Davide

[1] http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/GUIFonts


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#161998: just for guys Ione

2006-09-11 Thread Concha
The three brand name drugs available to improve sex lives are now available in 
generic form at a significantly
lower price.

Pick up the one that is best for you at:

http://dggo.com.ehmjv316140208j05vdixgvo0vdv.inetosc.ph







leg polish



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



busybox 1:1.1.3-3 MIGRATED to testing

2006-09-11 Thread Debian testing watch
FYI: The status of the busybox source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.

  Previous version: 1:1.1.3-2
  Current version:  1:1.1.3-3

-- 
This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible.
See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [g-i] new screenshots available (dejavu 2.9)

2006-09-11 Thread Jens Seidel
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:06:45PM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
 I've taken some screenshots as it was done a while ago (see [1])
 
 the screenshots can be found in [2], and in case you wanted to compare them 
 to the
 previous, see [3]

I compared [2] and [3] and both look similar. Nevertheless I miss a
problem in the pictures which I reported already for beta 3:

I get .. instead of ... in the graphical installer for German. Is
this a font problem or does the graphical installer just add additional
ellipses?

Jens


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



partman-crypto override disparity

2006-09-11 Thread Debian Installer
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

partman-crypto-dm_13_all.udeb: package says priority is optional, override says 
standard.
partman-crypto-loop_13_all.udeb: package says priority is optional, override 
says standard.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please reply to this mail and explain why.

[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you replied to one
like it before and have not received a response yet, please ignore
this mail.  Your reply needs to be processed by a human and will be in
due course, but until then the installer will send these automated
mails; sorry.]

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED])


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



partman-crypto_13_i386.changes ACCEPTED

2006-09-11 Thread Debian Installer

Accepted:
partman-crypto-dm_13_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-dm_13_all.udeb
partman-crypto-loop_13_all.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-loop_13_all.udeb
partman-crypto_13.dsc
  to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_13.dsc
partman-crypto_13.tar.gz
  to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_13.tar.gz
partman-crypto_13_i386.udeb
  to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_13_i386.udeb


Override entries for your package:
partman-crypto-dm_13_all.udeb - standard debian-installer
partman-crypto-loop_13_all.udeb - standard debian-installer
partman-crypto_13.dsc - source debian-installer
partman-crypto_13_i386.udeb - standard debian-installer

Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [g-i] new screenshots available (dejavu 2.9)

2006-09-11 Thread Frans Pop
On Monday 11 September 2006 23:00, Jens Seidel wrote:
 I get .. instead of ... in the graphical installer for German. Is
 this a font problem or does the graphical installer just add additional
 ellipses?

It's not only in German...

Looks like the gtk frontend does indeed add three extra periods after the 
string that is taken from debconf:

gtk.c, line 1794:
sprintf(progress_bar_label_string,i %s.../i,info);

Fix committed in SVN. Thanks for spotting this.


pgpkaTV3KFmy2.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Lost on new insatallation

2006-09-11 Thread Sam Franc

I just bought Debian 3.1 i386 Rel R2.
I know absolutely nothing about Linux.
I have been a MS user for 20? years.
Never used a password with MS.
Just booted right up.
Now with Debian I am Password bolluxed up.
Installation insisted on a password a couple of times.
I don't even know the terms but I guess it asked for a password for ROOT 
and USER.

I think I need a text book to read up on the terms.
I bought LINUX from Scratch By Gerard Beekmans.
But that is no help at all to me.
They problem to start is I can't even get booted up.
I run through a couple of password requests.
I don't know if they are user or root.
After many trials I can get past them and the following shows up:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$_
I have no idea what to enter here or what it is?
I am stuck.
Sam Franc
PS:I just want to get Debian installed from the DVD.
I can't depend on downloading anything as I get only 26.4 on a regular 
basis and that cuts out on me.



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: [g-i] new screenshots available (dejavu 2.9)

2006-09-11 Thread Peter Mann
On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 10:06:45PM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
  * dejavu2.9 has been used (last time we used 2.7)
  * #374902 was fixed with a new upload of libfreetype6-udeb_2.2.1-4_i386.udeb

 [2] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/20060911_dejavu2.9/
 [3] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/20060621_dejavu2.7/


Slovak is fine, Czech is fine ... great

-- 

5o   Peter.Mann at tuke.sk



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]