Bug#395262: "Arch: all" package FTBFS due to test needing network access - RC?
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 08:02:22AM +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > While I fully agree with you on all points, I think that this should be > discussed post-etch with the general question of "in which environment > are packages supposed to build ?". There are other similar issue, like: > - should packages allow to build as root ? (aegis, bazaar, subversion > don't) This question is misphrased; the real question is, "should we require that all packages be buildable as root?" And I don't see any reason the answer to this question is "yes". > - should packages build the same if they are built in a minimal debian > environment only satisfying their b-dep, and in a system with lots of > useless packages installed ? These are already RC bugs due to non-reproducibility of builds, they just aren't practical to find systematically. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: http://wiki.debian.org/SvenLutherAndDI (Was: Open Letter to Anthony Towns about the d-i mediation ...)
John, Can we take this privately next time ? On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:31:32PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:54:38PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > > Surely we have passed this point a month or two ago. We are wasting > > > everyone's time. > > > > > > Sven, please just live and let live. > > > > John, what do you think this is all about ? I would be very very happy to > > follow this advice, this is indeed my most express wish, but the sad truth > > is > > that Frans is the one who is unable to 'live and let live'. > > Sven, it doesn't matter. It truly doesn't. > > If he says an insult, please just ignore it. > > If he rejects your patch, please just ignore it. > > If he keeps you out of d-i, please just ignore it. And if he hurts the powerpc users with these actions ? Furthermore, my professional and thus personal live is directly affected by this issue, so ... > Please, think about what's best for the project. I think, and i remember my engagement on the social contract, how i would put freee software and our users as my top priorities. The way things currently stand hurts our users, and measuring and comparing things, i trully believe that you and everyone other can assuredly support a few mails, for the best of our users. Furthermore, if more people had steped in so many month ago instead of ignoring this, and if the DPL had been a better mediator, this would have been fixed at the latest in early june, and the project would have spared a lot of disagrement, and debian would be much better off for it (well, people would probably have spent more time flaming on assorted other stuff, but for me at least i would have done more debian work). > Do you think you raise other developers' opinions of you by continuing > to raise these old issues? My opinion of you keeps going lower and > lower each time you do it. Right now, I would pretty much reject an > offer from you to help me -- with anything -- immediately, on the > grounds that working with you is too much effort to benefit me. Is it too much effort ? For a few mails you can easily ignore if you wanted ? Really, i think there is something really really sick in debian, when writing mails can be considered as the ultimate offense. Please think about it. > You aren't accomplishing anything for Debian with this thread. You > probably know that this thread isn't going to change people's minds Well, it will not be my fault, i have written those 2 open letters in the most reasonable way i could think of, i have written the wiki page on suggestions given to me on the irc channels, andin the most positive way i could think of. Yes, i expect people to change their minds on that, i think that is only fair, and i have high hopes on the fairness of the debian developpers. > now. You need to accept that life is the way it is, that life is not > fair, and that this is the way things are. It's not the first time > someone has been excluded from a free software project, and it's not > the last. Well, yes, but d-i is not just any project, d-i is a debian sub-project, and part of debian. So, i question the right of the d-i leadership, or rather frans, to excude me. I do good work, i have played by the rules, i have the best interest of our users and debian in mind. Keeping me excluded is *NOT* for the best of debian, and since the DPL totally failed to mediate, and left us in this mess, and is silent despite my repeated calls, what other issue is left to me ? You know, if the DPL doesn't step in, i am seriously thinking that i will go as far as doing an official recall of him, not only because of this, but because he has mostly been lying to us. > As Ted T'so pointed out in another thread, people have gotten rich off > his work and he hasn't seen much from it. It's not fair, but he still > works on Linux. So ? > One of my GRs was never voted on becuase the Debian secretary (NOT > Manoj) at the time was AWOL. That was annoying, maybe unfair, but you > don't see me still bringing it up 6 years later (except as an example > of how to let go!) I still believe -- very deeply -- that I was > right, and that Debian still follows the wrong path. Because you are not still suffering from it in your daily debian activities, and because you don't see our users being hurt by it. I rather strongly believe that if these where the case, you would act as me. > If you think you can do d-i better, then fork it, and be silent until > you have written your better version. Let people look at it, accept > or reject it on its merits, and then accept whatever happens, even if > you don't like it. Yeah, this has been the advice others have given me. I don't think this would be best for the project, and my course of action has been to work within the constraints the DPL set, because i wanted to regain official access. > > Yeah, and since many folk have the same kind of opinion as you, we are > > having > > this conversatio
Bug#395262: "Arch: all" package FTBFS due to test needing network access - RC?
(Cced the relevant bug report) On 31/10/06 at 23:50 -0500, Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > > > Some packages (e.g choose-mirror) fetch a newer version of a file during > > build if it's possible to fetch that file. I don't think this is RC, > > since the file is not missing from the package if the network is not > > available. > > > > In general, I strongly suspect that fetching updated source during build > is RC due to a violation of the Social Contract: the source we are > shipping intentionally does not correspond to the binary package. > > I'm not sure if the above applies to choose-mirror. In particular, if > the file shipped in the binary is its own source, then it doesn't. > However, I'd still say it's bad idea, and a bug (maybe even RC). Some > more general reasons (not all necessarily apply to choose-mirror) > > * changes to the package are not reflected in the changelog > * random network or remote server issues can cause a broken (or > worse) build. What happens if the file on the server is corrupted? > * builds are no longer repeatable. Different source may even wind up > built on different architectures. > * the package is much harder to NMU. What should be a spelling fix > suddenly becomes a large change (due to the automated source > pull), unbeknown to the NMU-er. Same problem for the security team. > * the supposedly-signed source package isn't really; it's pulling > unsigned source for the build > > Also, depending on what is being downloaded from the network, there > could be security issues. What happens if the server is compromised? While I fully agree with you on all points, I think that this should be discussed post-etch with the general question of "in which environment are packages supposed to build ?". There are other similar issue, like: - should packages allow to build as root ? (aegis, bazaar, subversion don't) - should packages build the same if they are built in a minimal debian environment only satisfying their b-dep, and in a system with lots of useless packages installed ? There are RC bugs to fix now ;) -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Info on partman/auto format
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 14:34, Alexander Vogel wrote:
> Just for Information:
> I set up a server (routing) with one drbd devices on sda . Now today i
> wanted to install (management) with 3 drbd devices on sda 9 .. 11
> over the routing server but get a kernel panic error
>
> To exclude it from from the list (and to say to my boss, that's not
> causing the error):
I doubt even a severe error in a recipe should be able to cause a kernel
panic. It might do unexpected things to your disc, but not panic the
kernel. After all, partman will only translate the recipe into "regular"
calls to libparted.
> In method{ } it's also possible to use keep, so
> i asume this is formating the partition ?!
> [snap]
> 1 1 1 ext3 method{ format } format{ } use_
> filesystem{ } filesystem{ ext3 } mountpoint{ /clstdmc } .
> [snap]
Looks correct to me.
> Is there a parameter i can set in format{ } ?
No, not as far as I know.
> @Frans: could you please give me a link to the documentation.You have
> maybe better things to do, as to answer my questions ;-)
The only documentation I'm aware of is the appendix on preseeding in the
installation guide and this document:
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/d-i/trunk/installer/doc/devel/partman-auto-recipe.txt?op=file&rev=0&sc=0
Cheers,
FJP
pgp7VKOqWAQdz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: Bug#396125: installation-report: PowerBook G4 installed fine
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 396125 xorg-xserver-core Bug#396125: installation-report: PowerBook G4 installed fine Warning: Unknown package 'xorg-xserver-core' Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `xorg-xserver-core'. > retitle 396125 powerpc new install: selects us instead of sg (Swiss) keymap Bug#396125: installation-report: PowerBook G4 installed fine Warning: Unknown package 'xorg-xserver-core' Changed Bug title. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396125: installation-report: PowerBook G4 installed fine
reassign 396125 xorg-xserver-core retitle 396125 powerpc new install: selects us instead of sg (Swiss) keymap thanks On Monday 30 October 2006 00:23, Niklaus Giger wrote: > Comments/Problems: > > I selected USB swiss german keymap. > Installation of Desktop system, etc all was fine, but X put a wrong > keymap into xorg (us, instead of sg). Reassigning your report to the XOrg people for this. Thank you for filing your installation report. pgpl2UITnvWfU.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: r42375 - trunk/packages/po
> Right, but I'd miss the fact that something changed. And next "svn up" Well, we have a small notification robot which can mail you when some files changes in the various packages in levels 1-5. It is a bit jerky since the alioth relocation but it is definitely helpful. I can add your mail address there if you're OK. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#396412: installation-reports: Installation report on AS/400 / iSeries / System i / i5
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 17:30, Sebastian Schmidt wrote: > Comments/Problems: > I tried to install Debian as a "guest" within an i5/OS (or OS/400) > partition via the CRTNWSD (Create Network Server Description) command. Hmm. Nice to see a report for this. I didn't even know we supported AS/400 boxes :-) > After booting into SMS, I was able to choose the virtual CD-ROM drive > as IPL source. Booting and installing was straightforward (in case, one > chose the "expert64" or "install64" yaboot entry - i5 refuses to boot > from 32 bit kernels and crashes into ofdbg displaying a nice register > dump). Graphics were a bit garbled[1] on the console (via telnet partition> 2301), but d-i was usable. The installer uses UTF-8 encoding. You may get a better display if you're able to configure the remote console to use that. > D-i allowed me to make my root partition managed by LVM, what I chose > on my first try. However, yaboot was unable to read its config from > this partition, so I reinstalled (it was friday afternoon anyway) it > without LVM on my /. This probably could be made to work by using a separate /boot partition. > yaboot was installed to a PReP partition (nothing notably until then) > and the system rebooted. Unfortunately, I didn't start installation in > expert mode, so I didn't notice that d-i only installed a 32 bit > kernel. As expected, yaboot booted right into the open firmware > debugger. > > After re-restarting the installation in expert mode, I hoped to find a > 64 bit kernel in the installer's kernel selection list. However, only > 32 bit kernels where listed, so I had to install a 64 bit version via a > chroot environment in the command line. I'm not quite sure how the kernel selection for powerpc works, but we should be able to fix this. Could you send us the output of 'cat /proc/cpuinfo'? > After rebooting, yaboot loaded the Elf64 kernel and all services > started. However, a getty did not start on /dev/console (what made me a > bit nervous first). I don't know if this is considered a bug or not... What did you change in /etc/inittab to fix this. D-I basically supports two modes of installation: - regular monitor connected to video card - serial console installs; should set up a serial console for the installed system too If you used a serial console, what is its name? Is it /dev/ttyS? or something fancy? Cheers, FJP pgpvnQfgC82Ez.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#395886: marked as done ()
Your message dated Wed, 01 Nov 2006 07:27:20 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#395886: has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Boot method: Image version: Date: Machine: Processor: Memory: Partitions: Output of lspci and lspci -n: Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [E] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[O] Install boot loader:[O] Reboot: [O] Comments/Problems: Multiple network card (Built in on a MSI K8N Neo4) detection is confused. The same card is detected as eth0, eth1 or eth2 upon subsequent install trials. --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- On Saturday 28 October 2006 14:20, Giorgio Pioda wrote: > Comments/Problems: > Multiple network card (Built in on a MSI K8N Neo4) detection is > confused. The same card is detected as eth0, eth1 or eth2 upon > subsequent install trials. Yes, that can happen. This is a "feature" of the way modern kernels detect devices and not something we can influence in the installer. Basically the kernel probes all hardware in parallel and this can lead to different results on different boots. As your installation was successful, I'm closing your report. Thank you very much for submitting it. Cheers, FJP --- End Message ---
Bug#396483: d-i testing image 31Oct06 on amd64 failed on reboot
Hello Clive, On Wednesday 01 November 2006 01:16, Clive Menzies wrote: > Comments/Problems: > VFS Cannot open root device "hda13" or unknown-block(0,0) > Please append a correct "root=" boot option > Kernel panic - not syncing: VVVFS Unable to mount root fs on > unknown-block(0,0) In general that means that the initrd fails to load the drivers needed to access the hard disk, OR, if there are multiple disk controllers in the system, that device names are assigned differently during the boot than during the installation. The messages you show here are insufficient to diagnose this. You'll need to look back to check: - is the driver needed for your disk controller being loaded - is the disk recognized - as what is it recognized - are the partitions seen Are you dropped into a debug shell when the failure occurs? If you are, check if the modules needed are loaded (cat /proc/modules), check if the disk devices are listed in /dev/. > I should mention that this was previously a PV in an LVM setup. I'd > already removed the partition from the VG and formatted it (I thought) > as ext3 but the d-i read it as type LVM; so I formatted it again as > ext3 during the install. Hmm. Did you also remove the LVM metadata from it? That could have something to do with it, though I doubt it. Any messages in the scrollback on the console related to LVM? If you need to fix anything (like manually include a module in the initrd), use the installer's rescue mode. Cheers, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396469: Installation report: failed install on Toshiba Satellite
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 23:23, Bill McNeill wrote: > Machine: Toshiba Satellite > Processor: Intel Celeron 2.80 GHz Strange, I have a quite similar machine which I reinstalled very recently and which works perfectly (Toshiba Satellite A40, Mobile Pentium 4, 2.8 GHz). > Comments/Problems: > I did an install from CD taking all the defaults. When rebooting I get > a Segmentation Fault followed by the error message You don't say what causes the segfault. We'll need all the information that you can see on the screen when it fails to help find the cause. Can you still scroll upwards after the segfault (using shift-PgUp)? If so, the lines immediately before the segfault (at least 5 or so) and the lines of the segfault itself would be interesting to see. > <6> Journalled Block device driver loaded > pivot_root: No such file or directory > /sbin/init: 432: cannot open dev/console: No such file > Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init! In general these messages mean that the initrd fails to load the drivers needed to access the hard disk, OR, if there are multiple disk controllers in the system, that device names are assigned differently during the boot than during the installation. Are you dropped into a debug shell when the failure occurs? If you are, check if the modules needed are loaded (cat /proc/modules), check if any disk devices are listed in /dev/. Cheers, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: http://wiki.debian.org/SvenLutherAndDI (Was: Open Letter to Anthony Towns about the d-i mediation ...)
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 10:54:38PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > Surely we have passed this point a month or two ago. We are wasting > > everyone's time. > > > > Sven, please just live and let live. > > John, what do you think this is all about ? I would be very very happy to > follow this advice, this is indeed my most express wish, but the sad truth is > that Frans is the one who is unable to 'live and let live'. Sven, it doesn't matter. It truly doesn't. If he says an insult, please just ignore it. If he rejects your patch, please just ignore it. If he keeps you out of d-i, please just ignore it. Please, think about what's best for the project. Do you think you raise other developers' opinions of you by continuing to raise these old issues? My opinion of you keeps going lower and lower each time you do it. Right now, I would pretty much reject an offer from you to help me -- with anything -- immediately, on the grounds that working with you is too much effort to benefit me. You aren't accomplishing anything for Debian with this thread. You probably know that this thread isn't going to change people's minds now. You need to accept that life is the way it is, that life is not fair, and that this is the way things are. It's not the first time someone has been excluded from a free software project, and it's not the last. As Ted T'so pointed out in another thread, people have gotten rich off his work and he hasn't seen much from it. It's not fair, but he still works on Linux. One of my GRs was never voted on becuase the Debian secretary (NOT Manoj) at the time was AWOL. That was annoying, maybe unfair, but you don't see me still bringing it up 6 years later (except as an example of how to let go!) I still believe -- very deeply -- that I was right, and that Debian still follows the wrong path. If you think you can do d-i better, then fork it, and be silent until you have written your better version. Let people look at it, accept or reject it on its merits, and then accept whatever happens, even if you don't like it. > Yeah, and since many folk have the same kind of opinion as you, we are having > this conversation months after the issue could have been solved. That fact that the conversation exists does not make it beneficial for the project. You need to forgive Frans and d-i for whatever you think they did to you. We all need to know when to just drop something. Please, do it now. -- John -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396494: installation-reports: Can't install LVM related packages on during AMD64 install
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 04:41:39AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 01 November 2006 03:58, Ming Hua wrote: > > Comments/Problems: > > When partitioning disk with LVM, there is an error that lvm-common > > and lvm2 can't be installed. > > I've looked through that thread and the only things I can get from the > syslogs included is the following problem: > | apt-install: WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! > > This seems to indicate a problem with the mirror that is used, but that > message would be unexpected when using a netinst CD. It seems to me that the user gave up LVM and did a second install (which more or less succeeded, so I am not even sure the log he posted is for the first installation. I'll ask for clarification, but I am afraid that the log for the first installation is no longer available now. > Is this problem still reproducible when using a daily built image from > http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ ? I'll see if he is willing to test again with new daily image. Ming 2006.10.31 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#396494: change submitter, take two
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # As I've said, this report is forwarded from Chinese user list, > # therefore set submitter to the list. > package installation-reports Ignoring bugs not assigned to: installation-reports > submitter 396494 debian-chinese-gb@lists.debian.org Bug#396494: installation-reports: Can't install LVM related packages on during AMD64 install Changed Bug submitter from Ming Hua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396494: installation-reports: Can't install LVM related packages on during AMD64 install
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 03:58, Ming Hua wrote: > Comments/Problems: > When partitioning disk with LVM, there is an error that lvm-common > and lvm2 can't be installed. I've looked through that thread and the only things I can get from the syslogs included is the following problem: | apt-install: WARNING: The following packages cannot be authenticated! This seems to indicate a problem with the mirror that is used, but that message would be unexpected when using a netinst CD. Is this problem still reproducible when using a daily built image from http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ ? Is it possible to get the full syslog from the original installation (if the installation was completed it could still be availabe as /var/log/installer/syslog), or else from a new attempt? We would need that for the exact error messages. The syslog can be saved during the installation (after the failure occurred) by using the "Save logs" option in the installer's main menu. It would be best if the installation could be done in English. Cheers, FJP pgppVG3hhTRnf.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#396494: change submitter
# As I've said, this report is forwarded from Chinese user list, # therefore set submitter to the list. package installation-reports sumbitter 396494 debian-chinese-gb@lists.debian.org thanks Ming 2006.10.31 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396494: installation-reports: Can't install LVM related packages on during AMD64 install
Package: installation-reports Severity: normal [This is a forwarded installation report that was reported on the Chinese user list first. The original discussion was mixed in English and simplified Chinese, in the thread starting at: http://www.mail-archive.com/debian-chinese-gb%40lists.debian.org/msg13783.html Hope it's still relevant. -- Ming] Boot method: network Image version: debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso and netboot.tar.gz downloaded from http://www.us.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/ on October 24th. Date: October 26th, 2006 Machine: DIY machine, with: Processor: amd am2 athlon 64 3000+ Memory: 2G Harddisk: maxtor 250G sata Partitions: (not clear) Output of lspci and lspci -n: $ lspci 00:00.0 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C51 Host Bridge (rev a2) 00:00.1 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C51 Memory Controller 0 (rev a2) 00:00.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C51 Memory Controller 1 (rev a2) 00:00.3 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C51 Memory Controller 5 (rev a2) 00:00.4 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C51 Memory Controller 4 (rev a2) 00:00.5 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C51 Host Bridge (rev a2) 00:00.6 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C51 Memory Controller 3 (rev a2) 00:00.7 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation C51 Memory Controller 2 (rev a2) 00:02.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation C51 PCI Express Bridge (rev a1) 00:03.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation C51 PCI Express Bridge (rev a1) 00:04.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation C51 PCI Express Bridge (rev a1) 00:05.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation C51G [GeForce 6100] (rev a2) 00:09.0 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation MCP51 Host Bridge (rev a2) 00:0a.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP51 LPC Bridge (rev a2) 00:0a.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation MCP51 SMBus (rev a2) 00:0a.2 RAM memory: nVidia Corporation MCP51 Memory Controller 0 (rev a2) 00:0b.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation MCP51 USB Controller (rev a2) 00:0b.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation MCP51 USB Controller (rev a2) 00:0d.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP51 IDE (rev a1) 00:0e.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation MCP51 Serial ATA Controller (rev a1) 00:10.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation MCP51 PCI Bridge (rev a2) 00:10.2 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation MCP51 AC97 Audio Controller (rev a2) 00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration 00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map 00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller 00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control 04:08.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) 04:09.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8139/8139C/8139C+ (rev 10) $ lspci -n 00:00.0 0500: 10de:02f1 (rev a2) 00:00.1 0500: 10de:02fa (rev a2) 00:00.2 0500: 10de:02fe (rev a2) 00:00.3 0500: 10de:02f8 (rev a2) 00:00.4 0500: 10de:02f9 (rev a2) 00:00.5 0500: 10de:02ff (rev a2) 00:00.6 0500: 10de:027f (rev a2) 00:00.7 0500: 10de:027e (rev a2) 00:02.0 0604: 10de:02fc (rev a1) 00:03.0 0604: 10de:02fd (rev a1) 00:04.0 0604: 10de:02fb (rev a1) 00:05.0 0300: 10de:0242 (rev a2) 00:09.0 0500: 10de:0270 (rev a2) 00:0a.0 0601: 10de:0261 (rev a2) 00:0a.1 0c05: 10de:0264 (rev a2) 00:0a.2 0500: 10de:0272 (rev a2) 00:0b.0 0c03: 10de:026d (rev a2) 00:0b.1 0c03: 10de:026e (rev a2) 00:0d.0 0101: 10de:0265 (rev a1) 00:0e.0 0101: 10de:0266 (rev a1) 00:10.0 0604: 10de:026f (rev a2) 00:10.2 0401: 10de:026b (rev a2) 00:18.0 0600: 1022:1100 00:18.1 0600: 1022:1101 00:18.2 0600: 1022:1102 00:18.3 0600: 1022:1103 04:08.0 0200: 10ec:8139 (rev 10) 04:09.0 0200: 10ec:8139 (rev 10) Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [No cdrom] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[O] Mount partitions: [O] Install base system:[E] Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [ ] Comments/Problems: When partitioning disk with LVM, there is an error that lvm-common and lvm2 can't be installed. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#396480: ASUS P5W DH de luxe + E6600
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 396480 normal Bug#396480: installation-reports: D-I does not work on ASUS P5W DH de luxe + E6600 Severity set to `normal' from `grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396480: marked as done (installation-reports: D-I does not work on ASUS P5W DH de luxe + E6600)
Your message dated Wed, 01 Nov 2006 01:46:35 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#396480: ASUS P5W DH de luxe + E6600 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable boot starts, but enter an endless loop resetting the SATA controller when it tries to find the disks. Also, dmesg shows spurious irq not handled on this hardware. Apparently fixed via the libata upgrade available in 2.6.18.x -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing-proposed-updates APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.19-rc3-git5 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- severity 396480 normal thanks On Wednesday 01 November 2006 00:59, Eric Valette wrote: > boot starts, but enter an endless loop resetting the SATA controller > when it tries to find the disks. Also, dmesg shows spurious irq not > handled on this hardware. Apparently fixed via the libata upgrade > available in 2.6.18.x That means that this will be automatically fixed when the installer switches to the 2.6.18 kernel which we expect to do in a couple of weeks time. It would be great if you could test again after we have done so. I expect there will be a call for testing on the debian-devel-announce list and the debian-boot list after we have made the switch. Closing this report as this is not really an installer issue, but the result of progress in kernel support for your hardware. Cheers, FJP --- End Message ---
Processed: Re: Bug#396482: installation-reports: S61mouse-support-x86 should use modprobe in the same way than other scripts (-q + || true)
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 396482 rootskel-gtk Bug#396482: installation-reports: S61mouse-support-x86 should use modprobe in the same way than other scripts (-q + || true) Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `rootskel-gtk'. > severity 396482 minor Bug#396482: installation-reports: S61mouse-support-x86 should use modprobe in the same way than other scripts (-q + || true) Severity set to `minor' from `normal' > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Installing Debian amd64 on an asus P5W DH Deluxe + E6600 : kernel on installer broken + bugs in d-i when changing kernel + modules
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 01:05, Eric Valette wrote: > Found the culprit : S61mouse-support-x86 is incorrectly written : it > does not use -q option for modeprobe not the || true. Nice job of tracing that! The installer is not really set up to work with kernels that are configured totally different from the standard Debian kernels. If you really have a totally different kernel, you may run into other issues as well later on in the installation. > Will fill a bug because it almost prevent to easilly upgrade to a > newer/better configured kernel. Note that "better configured" is a subjective opinion. For the installer, it is much better (or at least safer) to start with the configuration the Debian kernel uses. How you configure the kernel for your installed system is of course completely up to you. This particular issue is fairly easily avoided, so I have no problem with fixing it. Please file your bug report against the package rootskel-gtk. Cheers, FJP pgppcI02992sK.pgp Description: PGP signature
partman-efi_11_ia64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: partman-efi_11.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-efi/partman-efi_11.dsc partman-efi_11.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-efi/partman-efi_11.tar.gz partman-efi_11_ia64.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-efi/partman-efi_11_ia64.udeb Override entries for your package: partman-efi_11.dsc - source debian-installer partman-efi_11_ia64.udeb - standard debian-installer Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
elilo-installer_1.7_ia64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: elilo-installer_1.7.dsc to pool/main/e/elilo-installer/elilo-installer_1.7.dsc elilo-installer_1.7.tar.gz to pool/main/e/elilo-installer/elilo-installer_1.7.tar.gz elilo-installer_1.7_ia64.udeb to pool/main/e/elilo-installer/elilo-installer_1.7_ia64.udeb Override entries for your package: elilo-installer_1.7.dsc - source debian-installer elilo-installer_1.7_ia64.udeb - standard debian-installer Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
efi-reader_0.9_ia64.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: efi-reader_0.9.dsc to pool/main/e/efi-reader/efi-reader_0.9.dsc efi-reader_0.9.tar.gz to pool/main/e/efi-reader/efi-reader_0.9.tar.gz efi-reader_0.9_ia64.udeb to pool/main/e/efi-reader/efi-reader_0.9_ia64.udeb Override entries for your package: efi-reader_0.9.dsc - source debian-installer efi-reader_0.9_ia64.udeb - optional debian-installer Announcing to debian-devel-changes@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396483: d-i testing image 31Oct06 on amd64 failed on reboot
Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version: http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/amd64/debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso Date: 23:15 (GMT) 31 0ct 06 Machine: Acer Aspire 1524WLMi Processor: amd athlon 64 / 3400+ Memory:512Mb Partitions: Disk /dev/hda: 60.0 GB, 60011642880 bytes 255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 7296 cylinders Units = cylinders of 16065 * 512 = 8225280 bytes Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System /dev/hda1 1 255 2048256 12 Compaq diagnostics /dev/hda2 * 256153710297665c W95 FAT32 (LBA) /dev/hda31538729646259167+ f W95 Ext'd (LBA) /dev/hda515382072 4297356c W95 FAT32 (LBA) /dev/hda636484285 5124703+ 8e Linux LVM /dev/hda742864407 979933+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/hda84408632815430401 8e Linux LVM /dev/hda963297296 7775428+ 83 Linux /dev/hda10 20732078 48163+ 83 Linux /dev/hda11 20792139 489951 8e Linux LVM /dev/hda12 21402309 1365493+ 82 Linux swap / Solaris /dev/hda13 26913282 4755208+ 83 Linux /dev/hda14 32833647 2931862 83 Linux /dev/hda15 23102690 3060351 83 Linux Partition table entries are not in disk order Test install is on /dev/hda13 Output of lspci -nn and lspci -vnn: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ lspci -nn 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8M800 Host Bridge [1106:0204] 00:00.1 Host bridge [0600]: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8M800 Host Bridge [1106:1204] 00:00.2 Host bridge [0600]: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8M800 Host Bridge [1106:2204] 00:00.3 Host bridge [0600]: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8M800 Host Bridge [1106:3204] 00:00.4 Host bridge [0600]: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8M800 Host Bridge [1106:4204] 00:00.7 Host bridge [0600]: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8M800 Host Bridge [1106:7204] 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 PCI bridge [K8T800/K8T890 South] [1106:b188] 00:0a.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Linksys, A Division of Cisco Systems [AirConn] INPROCOMM IPN 2220 Wireless LAN Adapter (rev 01) [17fe:2220] 00:0b.0 CardBus bridge [0607]: Texas Instruments PCI7420 CardBus Controller [104c:ac8e] 00:0b.1 CardBus bridge [0607]: Texas Instruments PCI7420 CardBus Controller [104c:ac8e] 00:0b.2 FireWire (IEEE 1394) [0c00]: Texas Instruments PCI7x20 1394a-2000 OHCI Two-Port PHY/Link-Layer Controller [104c:802e] 00:0c.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL-8169 Gigabit Ethernet [10ec:8169] (rev 10) 00:10.0 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller [1106:3038] (rev 80) 00:10.1 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller [1106:3038] (rev 80) 00:10.2 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller [1106:3038] (rev 80) 00:10.3 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 [1106:3104] (rev 82) 00:11.0 ISA bridge [0601]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8235 ISA Bridge [1106:3177] 00:11.1 IDE interface [0101]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE [1106:0571] (rev 06) 00:11.5 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233/A/8235/8237 AC97 Audio Controller [1106:3059] (rev 50) 00:11.6 Communication controller [0780]: VIA Technologies, Inc. AC'97 Modem Controller [1106:3068] (rev 80) 00:18.0 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration [1022:1100] 00:18.1 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map [1022:1101] 00:18.2 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller [1022:1102] 00:18.3 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control [1022:1103] 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation NV36 [GeForce FX Go5700] [10de:0347] (rev a1) $ lspci -vnn //attached as file lspci-vnn Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [o] Detect network card:[o] Configure network: [o] Detect CD: [o] Load installer modules: [o] Detect hard drives: [o] Partition hard drives: [o] Install base system:[o] Clock/timezone setup: [o] User/password setup:[o] Install tasks: [o] Install boot loader:[ ] Overall install:[E] Comments/Problems: I aborted the grub install as this is one of several systems on this box and I maintain grub from my production system; I chose to proceed without a bootloader. The install was very slick up to the reboot - the system seemed to find the kernel to boot but didn't re
Bug#396482: installation-reports: S61mouse-support-x86 should use modprobe in the same way than other scripts (-q + || true)
Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Using this version of the script make this system boot with a kernel where all modules are built-in if [ "$DEBIAN_FRONTEND" = gtk ] ; then modprobe -q evdev || true modprobe psmouse || true fi -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing-proposed-updates APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.19-rc3-git5 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Installing Debian amd64 on an asus P5W DH Deluxe + E6600 : kernel on installer broken + bugs in d-i when changing kernel + modules
Eric Valette wrote: > Please CC me when anwsering: I'm not suscribed. > > 1) Did anybody else tried to replace a kernel with all drivers build in? > Why did the "modprobe -q evdev ||true" fail? Has it anything to do with > SMP support as the shell will probably spawn the two child on different > proc but should receive exit status as on UP? Sound like a bug in d-i > isn't it? Found the culprit : S61mouse-support-x86 is incorrectly written : it does not use -q option for modeprobe not the || true. Will fill a bug because it almost prevent to easilly upgrade to a newer/better configured kernel. -- eric -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396480: installation-reports: D-I does not work on ASUS P5W DH de luxe + E6600
Package: installation-reports Severity: grave Justification: renders package unusable boot starts, but enter an endless loop resetting the SATA controller when it tries to find the disks. Also, dmesg shows spurious irq not handled on this hardware. Apparently fixed via the libata upgrade available in 2.6.18.x -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers testing-proposed-updates APT policy: (500, 'testing-proposed-updates'), (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.19-rc3-git5 Locale: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (charmap=ISO-8859-15) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396463: Installation Report
Comment: I use the mouse left handed. Is it possible to change the mouse buttons order someway before installation begins? It seems that directfb supports setting this in /etc/directfbrc. From the manpage: [no-]lefty Swaps left and right mouse buttons. Useful for left-handers. I guess we could add a boot parameter for this. Could you confirm if this actually works by following the following this procedure: - boot the installer with 'installgui BOOT_DEBUG=3' - at the first debug shell: - 'nano /etc/directfbrc' - add a new line containing "lefty" (without the quotes) - type exit twice to exit debug shells Works perfectly. I sugest this could be a boot parameter. I'm not exactly a left-handed person but my right-hand tendons argue for this after 15 years clicking a mouse. Left-handed users all around the world too ;) Best regards Flavio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#396458: powerpc d-i miboot floppy doesn't boot
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:31:40AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 01 November 2006 00:05, Sven Luther wrote: > > I even commented to this effect in a direct followup to the mail benh > > wrote with the patch : > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2006/09/msg00338.html > > If that bug is fixed, then why do the images still not boot? Oh, and BTW, why you don't ask holger to investigate this, he has the hardware and the knowledge, and claims that i have done nothing but hurt the powerpc port, he sure can actually back up this kind of claims with some actual work, don't you think ? Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396332: installation-report: Desktop environment option in tasksel should let user know it is gnome.
I don't understand what is lost by making this change. If this is a known issue, which bug is it a duplicate of? The fact that this is a FAQ for tasksel should tell us something. I can appreciate the view that "average users" don't care about the name of the desktop, but nothing is lost by attaching gnome in parenthesis as suggested. It would still clear that they are going to install a desktop environment. "Average users" don't lose anything, and any user who is at all further advanced than "average" would be benefited. This is my only complaint on this great project. Cheers, Lex. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#396458: powerpc d-i miboot floppy doesn't boot
On Wed, Nov 01, 2006 at 12:31:40AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > On Wednesday 01 November 2006 00:05, Sven Luther wrote: > > I even commented to this effect in a direct followup to the mail benh > > wrote with the patch : > > > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2006/09/msg00338.html > > If that bug is fixed, then why do the images still not boot? Simple enough, because the fix above has nothing whatsoever to do with the reason why the images are not booting. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
localechooser 1.29 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the localechooser source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 1.28 Current version: 1.29 -- This email is automatically generated; [EMAIL PROTECTED] is responsible. See http://people.debian.org/~henning/trille/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#396458: powerpc d-i miboot floppy doesn't boot
On Wednesday 01 November 2006 00:05, Sven Luther wrote: > I even commented to this effect in a direct followup to the mail benh > wrote with the patch : > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2006/09/msg00338.html If that bug is fixed, then why do the images still not boot? pgpFlxxeKlZik.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: Re: Bug#396458: powerpc d-i miboot floppy doesn't boot
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 396458 debian-installer Bug#396458: powerpc d-i miboot floppy doesn't boot Bug reassigned from package `linux-2.6' to `debian-installer'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of efi-reader_0.9_ia64.changes
efi-reader_0.9_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: efi-reader_0.9.dsc efi-reader_0.9.tar.gz efi-reader_0.9_ia64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#396458: powerpc d-i miboot floppy doesn't boot
reassign 396458 debian-installer thanks On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:16:24PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: > severity 396458 important > tags 396458 patch > thanks > > On Tuesday 31 October 2006 22:08, rob rob wrote: > > While investigating that problem Benjamin Herrenschmidt sent this > > interesting mail with a patch, which may solve the problem: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2006/09/msg00337.html > > That patch looks like it is a patch to the powerpc kernel images, not to > debian installer, therefore reassigning. Frans, with all your lecturing to check a bit before commenting, i would have hoped you would do so yourself. The part of the kernel patched by this patch is totally unused in debian, it is moved into mkvmlinuz, but even then, it is not used in debian-installer, since the miboot images build code is not using mkvmlinuz since a year or so. I even commented to this effect in a direct followup to the mail benh wrote with the patch : http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2006/09/msg00338.html So you really have no excuse for doing such sloppy work, and i expect you to be more humble when you comment about similar error i may make in the future. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#396463: Installation Report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 396463 Support switching mouse to left-handed usage Bug#396463: Installation Report Changed Bug title. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#396463: Installation Report
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 396463 rootskel-gtk Bug#396463: Installation Report Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `rootskel-gtk'. > severity 396463 wishlist Bug#396463: Installation Report Severity set to `wishlist' from `normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396463: Installation Report
reassign 396463 rootskel-gtk severity 396463 wishlist thanks On Tuesday 31 October 2006 21:24, Flavio Henrique Araque Gurgel wrote: > Comments/Problems: > > I triyed to install twice, using expert and expertgui. > In the expertgui mode the mouse cursor changed to the text input icon > and didn't went back to the pointer icon. This behavior did not made my > installation to fail at all. That is a known minor issue. > Comment: I use the mouse left handed. Is it possible to change the > mouse buttons order someway before installation begins? It seems that directfb supports setting this in /etc/directfbrc. From the manpage: [no-]lefty Swaps left and right mouse buttons. Useful for left-handers. I guess we could add a boot parameter for this. Could you confirm if this actually works by following the following this procedure: - boot the installer with 'installgui BOOT_DEBUG=3' - at the first debug shell: - 'nano /etc/directfbrc' - add a new line containing "lefty" (without the quotes) - type exit twice to exit debug shells Cheers, FJP pgpmlVTOOVzhy.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processing of elilo-installer_1.7_ia64.changes
elilo-installer_1.7_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: elilo-installer_1.7.dsc elilo-installer_1.7.tar.gz elilo-installer_1.7_ia64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of partman-efi_11_ia64.changes
partman-efi_11_ia64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-efi_11.dsc partman-efi_11.tar.gz partman-efi_11_ia64.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396469: Installation report: failed install on Toshiba Satellite
Package: installation-reports Boot method: CDImage version: www.debian.org in October 2006 Date: 2:00 p.m. October 31, 2006 Machine: Toshiba SatelliteProcessor: Intel Celeron 2.80 GHz Memory: ???Partitions: Can't run df. I took the defaults the install program gave me: one for files plus a swap partitionCan't run lspci Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[ ]Configure network HW: [ ] Config network: [ ]Detect CD: [ ] Load installer modules: [ ]Detect hard drives: [ ] Partition hard drives: [ ]Create file systems:[ ] Mount partitions: [ ]Install base system:[ ] Install boot loader:[ ]Reboot: [E] Comments/Problems:I did an install from CD taking all the defaults. When rebooting I get a Segmentation Fault followed by the error message <6> Journalled Block device driver loaded pivot_root: No such file or directory/sbin/init: 432: cannot open dev/console: No such file Kernel panic: Attempted to kill init!I'm stuck. Can't get Debian to work on this machine. I did some Googling and determined that others have hit this error, but there appears to be no clear workaround. -- Bill McNeillhttp://staff.washington.edu/billmcn/index.shtml
Processed: Re: Bug#396458: powerpc d-i miboot floppy doesn't boot
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 396458 linux-2.6 Bug#396458: powerpc d-i miboot floppy doesn't boot Bug reassigned from package `kernel-image-2.6.17-2-powerpc-miboot-di' to `linux-2.6'. > severity 396458 important Bug#396458: powerpc d-i miboot floppy doesn't boot Severity set to `important' from `normal' > tags 396458 patch Bug#396458: powerpc d-i miboot floppy doesn't boot There were no tags set. Tags added: patch > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396458: powerpc d-i miboot floppy doesn't boot
reassign 396458 linux-2.6 severity 396458 important tags 396458 patch thanks On Tuesday 31 October 2006 22:08, rob rob wrote: > While investigating that problem Benjamin Herrenschmidt sent this > interesting mail with a patch, which may solve the problem: > http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2006/09/msg00337.html That patch looks like it is a patch to the powerpc kernel images, not to debian installer, therefore reassigning. Cheers, FJP pgpVIjtDTlQJz.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#396463: Installation Report
Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso Date: Oct 30th, 2006 01:00am Machine: Custom made by components Partitions: df -Tl output bellow Sist. Arq.Tipo1K-blocos Usad Dispon. Uso% Montado em /dev/sda1 ext319125300 2272844 15880928 13% / udev tmpfs 1024056 10184 1% /dev devshm tmpfs 258352 0258352 0% /dev/shm /dev/sda3 ext394814160 19124060 70873816 22% /home Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: I triyed to install twice, using expert and expertgui. In the expertgui mode the mouse cursor changed to the text input icon and didn't went back to the pointer icon. This behavior did not made my installation to fail at all. Comment: I use the mouse left handed. Is it possible to change the mouse buttons order someway before installation begins? umame -a: Linux dorabrasil 2.6.17-2-486 #1 Wed Sep 13 15:56:30 UTC 2006 i686 unknown lspci -nn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8T800Pro Host Bridge [1106:0282] lspci -nn: 00:00.1 Host bridge [0600]: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8T800Pro Host Bridge [1106:1282] lspci -nn: 00:00.2 Host bridge [0600]: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8T800Pro Host Bridge [1106:2282] lspci -nn: 00:00.3 Host bridge [0600]: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8T800Pro Host Bridge [1106:3282] lspci -nn: 00:00.4 Host bridge [0600]: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8T800Pro Host Bridge [1106:4282] lspci -nn: 00:00.7 Host bridge [0600]: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8T800Pro Host Bridge [1106:7282] lspci -nn: 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 PCI bridge [K8T800/K8T890 South] [1106:b188] lspci -nn: 00:07.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394) [0c00]: VIA Technologies, Inc. IEEE 1394 Host Controller [1106:3044] (rev 80) lspci -nn: 00:0a.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8001 Gigabit Ethernet Controller [11ab:4320] (rev 13) lspci -nn: 00:0f.0 RAID bus controller [0104]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VIA VT6420 SATA RAID Controller [1106:3149] (rev 80) lspci -nn: 00:0f.1 IDE interface [0101]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE [1106:0571] (rev 06) lspci -nn: 00:10.0 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller [1106:3038] (rev 81) lspci -nn: 00:10.1 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller [1106:3038] (rev 81) lspci -nn: 00:10.2 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller [1106:3038] (rev 81) lspci -nn: 00:10.3 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82x UHCI USB 1.1 Controller [1106:3038] (rev 81) lspci -nn: 00:10.4 USB Controller [0c03]: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 [1106:3104] (rev 86) lspci -nn: 00:11.0 ISA bridge [0601]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8237 ISA bridge [KT600/K8T800/K8T890 South] [1106:3227] lspci -nn: 00:11.5 Multimedia audio controller [0401]: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8233/A/8235/8237 AC97 Audio Controller [1106:3059] (rev 60) lspci -nn: 00:11.6 Communication controller [0780]: VIA Technologies, Inc. AC'97 Modem Controller [1106:3068] (rev 80) lspci -nn: 00:18.0 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration [1022:1100] lspci -nn: 00:18.1 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map [1022:1101] lspci -nn: 00:18.2 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller [1022:1102] lspci -nn: 00:18.3 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control [1022:1103] lspci -nn: 01:00.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation NV18 [GeForce4 MX 4000 AGP 8x] [10de:0185] (rev c1) lspci -vnn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8T800Pro Host Bridge [1106:0282] lspci -vnn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Unknown device [1043:80a3] lspci -vnn: Flags: bus master, 66MHz, medium devsel, latency 64 lspci -vnn: Memory at e800 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=128M] lspci -vnn: Capabilities: [80] AGP version 3.0 lspci -vnn: Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 lspci -vnn: Capabilities: [60] HyperTransport: Slave or Primary Interface lspci -vnn: Capabilities: [58] HyperTransport: Interrupt Discovery and Configuration lspci -vnn: lspci -vnn: 00:00.1 Host bridge [0600]: VIA Technologies, Inc. K8T800Pr
Bug#396307: installation-report: does not recover properly from broken d-i mirror
reassign 396307 choose-mirror -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396071: segfaults when attempting to take a screenshot while wget is running
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 12:08, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: > The attached patch fixes this bug: the screenshot button is disabled > after the user exits from a questions, and a bit earlier than before to > prevent possible nasty timing issues. Please commit this patch in SVN. I don't think the issue is important enough to delay RC1 for though. Note: please commit only this patch, not the one for #395052. I'd like to see how that looks first, but that won't be until after RC1 and possibly until after I'm back from Bhutan. Thanks for fixing this. pgpRbhvRuqQpz.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed: reassign 396307 to choose-mirror
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 396307 choose-mirror Bug#396307: installation-report: does not recover properly from broken d-i mirror Bug reassigned from package `choose-mirror' to `choose-mirror'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396071: segfaults when attempting to take a screenshot while wget is running
Frans Pop wrote: On Tuesday 31 October 2006 12:08, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: The attached patch fixes this bug: the screenshot button is disabled after the user exits from a questions, and a bit earlier than before to prevent possible nasty timing issues. Please commit this patch in SVN. I don't think the issue is important enough to delay RC1 for though. Note: please commit only this patch, not the one for #395052. I'd like to see how that looks first, but that won't be until after RC1 and possibly until after I'm back from Bhutan. Thanks for fixing this. Coommit for the only 396071 bug done. cheers Attilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396458: powerpc d-i miboot floppy doesn't boot
Package:kernel-image-2.6.17-2-powerpc-miboot-di Version:1.22 Hi, tried booting the powerpc debian installer floppy disk for etch/sid but it just got spat out. I used: dd if=boot.img of=/dev/fd0 bs=1024; sync to put the image on disk and booted with the option key pressed, but didn't get any debug. The boot.img from etch installer beta3 with kernel-image-2.6.16-2-powerpc-miboot-di worked, however the net-drivers.img was too big and I had to break up the install at that point While investigating that problem Benjamin Herrenschmidt sent this interesting mail with a patch, which may solve the problem: http://lists.debian.org/debian-powerpc/2006/09/msg00337.html I have a powerpc power macintosh 6500/225. Thanks in advance. Yours, Rob Homsi _ Use your PC to make calls at very low rates https://voiceoam.pcs.v2s.live.com/partnerredirect.aspx -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: http://wiki.debian.org/SvenLutherAndDI
Op 31-10-2006 om 15:13 schreef John Goerzen: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:20:24PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006, Sven Luther wrote: > > > Well, on various suggestions, i have written the following text : > > > http://wiki.debian.org/SvenLutherAndDI > > > > Would have been nice to clarify that this is your personal opinion on > > the subject, or (instead) that anyone is free to change the page, but > > at least one of the two. > > > > I suggest you open a page "SvensPOV", copy paste everything, and use > > SvenLutherAndDI to hold links to the opinions of various persons (and > > only that). > > There has to be some time where we all let bygones be bygones. > > Surely we have passed this point a month or two ago. We are wasting > everyone's time. Yep, it does suck time. Bearing my story of this stupid fight does also take energy, so felt the need to start http://wiki.debian.org/SvenLutherAndDiBg > Sven, please just live and let live. A good advice, that I just have damaged, sorry. Geert Stappers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396327: FSC Lifebook S7020
Frans Pop wrote: > That is currently not part nor a goal of the installation. You are > expected to set this up yourself afterwards. It's a tasksel goal, but the code to handle detecting the modules is not yet available in Debian. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: reassign 396307 to choose-mirror
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 396307 choose-mirror Bug#396307: installation-report: does not recover properly from broken d-i mirror Bug reassigned from package `choose-mirror' to `choose-mirror'. > End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: http://wiki.debian.org/SvenLutherAndDI (Was: Open Letter to Anthony Towns about the d-i mediation ...)
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:13:06PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:20:24PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006, Sven Luther wrote: > > > Well, on various suggestions, i have written the following text : > > > http://wiki.debian.org/SvenLutherAndDI > > > > Would have been nice to clarify that this is your personal opinion on > > the subject, or (instead) that anyone is free to change the page, but > > at least one of the two. > > > > I suggest you open a page "SvensPOV", copy paste everything, and use > > SvenLutherAndDI to hold links to the opinions of various persons (and > > only that). > > There has to be some time where we all let bygones be bygones. > > Surely we have passed this point a month or two ago. We are wasting > everyone's time. > > Sven, please just live and let live. John, what do you think this is all about ? I would be very very happy to follow this advice, this is indeed my most express wish, but the sad truth is that Frans is the one who is unable to 'live and let live'. > I don't want to see a single piece of mail about the d-i team unless it > relates to the Debian installer itself. Yeah, and since many folk have the same kind of opinion as you, we are having this conversation months after the issue could have been solved. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: http://wiki.debian.org/SvenLutherAndDI (Was: Open Letter to Anthony Towns about the d-i mediation ...)
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:20:24PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006, Sven Luther wrote: > > Well, on various suggestions, i have written the following text : > > http://wiki.debian.org/SvenLutherAndDI > > Would have been nice to clarify that this is your personal opinion on > the subject, or (instead) that anyone is free to change the page, but > at least one of the two. Thanks, i will change that. > I suggest you open a page "SvensPOV", copy paste everything, and use > SvenLutherAndDI to hold links to the opinions of various persons (and > only that). Euh, i am not sure i want a wiki page with my name in it written by anyone random. If they want to write a wiki page, they sure can write it under another name. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396412: installation-reports: Installation report on AS/400 / iSeries / System i / i5
Package: installation-reports Severity: normal -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Boot method: Virtual CD-ROM (LODIMGCLG IMGCLG(MYCLG) DEV(OPTVRT01) OPTION(*LOAD)) Image version: etch with d-i beta3 (as of August 2006) - http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta3/powerpc/iso-dvd Date: 27 Oct 2006 Machine: IBM iSeries / i5 / AS/400 / System i (whatever IBM calls it now) Model 570 Processor: POWER5+, 2.2GHz, dual-core Memory: 1275696 kB Partitions: sda1 PPC PReP Partition, sda2 /, sda5 swap Output of lspci -nn and lspci -vnn: Machine has no PCI Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [E] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [ ] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [E] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[E] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: I tried to install Debian as a "guest" within an i5/OS (or OS/400) partition via the CRTNWSD (Create Network Server Description) command. Unfortunately, i5/OS refused to recognize neither the yaird image nor the kernel itself as a valid IPL source. However, turning the partition on via the HMC and booting into SMS worked. Note that the the NWS has still to be varied on via WRKCFGSTS *NWS. Else, virtual I/O devices (and most notably NWSSTG) are missing. After booting into SMS, I was able to choose the virtual CD-ROM drive as IPL source. Booting and installing was straightforward (in case, one chose the "expert64" or "install64" yaboot entry - i5 refuses to boot from 32 bit kernels and crashes into ofdbg displaying a nice register dump). Graphics were a bit garbled[1] on the console (via telnet 2301), but d-i was usable. D-i allowed me to make my root partition managed by LVM, what I chose on my first try. However, yaboot was unable to read its config from this partition, so I reinstalled (it was friday afternoon anyway) it without LVM on my /. yaboot was installed to a PReP partition (nothing notably until then) and the system rebooted. Unfortunately, I didn't start installation in expert mode, so I didn't notice that d-i only installed a 32 bit kernel. As expected, yaboot booted right into the open firmware debugger. After re-restarting the installation in expert mode, I hoped to find a 64 bit kernel in the installer's kernel selection list. However, only 32 bit kernels where listed, so I had to install a 64 bit version via a chroot environment in the command line. After rebooting, yaboot loaded the Elf64 kernel and all services started. However, a getty did not start on /dev/console (what made me a bit nervous first). I don't know if this is considered a bug or not... Anyway - nice job! I didn't expect the installation to go on that smoothly ;-) Footnotes = 1: http://kitt.yath.de/~yath/2006-10-31-d-i-1.png -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFR3oavBVic1oTsEgRAq6UAJ9m8Tb8J7NSDJUqk2/fIuIGybYp9QCfe0a4 bwsmyTFGQ3ocvbbb8HvJu+M= =6CHk -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: http://wiki.debian.org/SvenLutherAndDI (Was: Open Letter to Anthony Towns about the d-i mediation ...)
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:20:24PM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006, Sven Luther wrote: > > Well, on various suggestions, i have written the following text : > > http://wiki.debian.org/SvenLutherAndDI > > Would have been nice to clarify that this is your personal opinion on > the subject, or (instead) that anyone is free to change the page, but > at least one of the two. > > I suggest you open a page "SvensPOV", copy paste everything, and use > SvenLutherAndDI to hold links to the opinions of various persons (and > only that). There has to be some time where we all let bygones be bygones. Surely we have passed this point a month or two ago. We are wasting everyone's time. Sven, please just live and let live. I don't want to see a single piece of mail about the d-i team unless it relates to the Debian installer itself. -- John
Bug#395052: Please provide the GTK frontend with a better handler for BOOLEAN questions
One more thing: please evaluate if it's better having the active by default radio button focused, so that the user has to move up/down with the arrows and then press enter, or if it's better having the focus on the inactive button. I assigned focus to the inactive radio button, so that i can simply press spacebar with the thumb and hit enter with the middle finger without using the arrow keys, but i'm not sure this is not confusing. Attilio -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#396307: installation-report: does not recover properly from broken d-i mirror
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 396307 choose-mirror Bug#396307: installation-report: does not recover properly from broken d-i mirror Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `choose-mirror'. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: http://wiki.debian.org/SvenLutherAndDI (Was: Open Letter to Anthony Towns about the d-i mediation ...)
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006, Sven Luther wrote: > Well, on various suggestions, i have written the following text : > http://wiki.debian.org/SvenLutherAndDI Would have been nice to clarify that this is your personal opinion on the subject, or (instead) that anyone is free to change the page, but at least one of the two. I suggest you open a page "SvensPOV", copy paste everything, and use SvenLutherAndDI to hold links to the opinions of various persons (and only that). I don't intend to write a page there myself, but it would make things clearer to the reader that what they are reading is written by SvenL, and not the position of the project for example. It would also leave room for AJsPOV and FJPsPOV if they wish commenting as involved parties (I'm not saying they should do it, but that it would make it easier). EOD for me, -- Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with SVN repository
Op 31-10-2006 om 17:54 schreef Christian Perrier: > > I created a guest account on https://alioth.debian.org and when I try to do: > > $ svn co svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/d-i/trunk > > A password I use to log into the alioth service is not the correct password > > for ssh - as I should guess ;) > > Do I need a developer account to get this work? > > > Alioth admins may have de-activated password-based logins on alioth > since the server relocation. > > In such case, you need to put a SSH pubkey at the right place in your > account on Alioth (from the pae where you manage your account settings). account on Alioth (from the page where you manage your account settings). > Feel free to ask further information (when needed) Cheers Geert Stappers remembering his d-i checkout -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396294: marked as done (Package: installation-reports)
Your message dated Tue, 31 Oct 2006 20:45:01 +0100 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#396294: Package: installation-reports has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/etch_di_beta3/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso Date: October 30, 2006 Machine: Dell Inspiron e1505 Processor: Core Duo Memory: 768MB RAM Partitions: FilesystemType 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/sda6 reiserfs17413864 5582596 11831268 33% / udev tmpfs 382972 144382828 1% /dev /dev/sda5 reiserfs25164988 7170348 17994640 29% /home /dev/sda2 ntfs31158064 30876008282056 100% /windows/C Output of lspci -nn and lspci -vnn: Everybody-knows:~ # lspci -nn 00:00.0 Class 0600: 8086:27a0 (rev 03) 00:02.0 Class 0300: 8086:27a2 (rev 03) 00:02.1 Class 0380: 8086:27a6 (rev 03) 00:1b.0 Class 0403: 8086:27d8 (rev 01) 00:1c.0 Class 0604: 8086:27d0 (rev 01) 00:1c.3 Class 0604: 8086:27d6 (rev 01) 00:1d.0 Class 0c03: 8086:27c8 (rev 01) 00:1d.1 Class 0c03: 8086:27c9 (rev 01) 00:1d.2 Class 0c03: 8086:27ca (rev 01) 00:1d.3 Class 0c03: 8086:27cb (rev 01) 00:1d.7 Class 0c03: 8086:27cc (rev 01) 00:1e.0 Class 0604: 8086:2448 (rev e1) 00:1f.0 Class 0601: 8086:27b9 (rev 01) 00:1f.2 Class 0101: 8086:27c4 (rev 01) 00:1f.3 Class 0c05: 8086:27da (rev 01) 03:00.0 Class 0200: 14e4:170c (rev 02) 03:01.0 Class 0c00: 1180:0832 03:01.1 Class 0805: 1180:0822 (rev 19) 03:01.2 Class 0880: 1180:0843 (rev 01) 03:01.3 Class 0880: 1180:0592 (rev 0a) 03:01.4 Class 0880: 1180:0852 (rev 05) 0b:00.0 Class 0280: 8086:4222 (rev 02) Everybody-knows:~ # lspci -vnn 00:00.0 Class 0600: 8086:27a0 (rev 03) Subsystem: 1028:01bd Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Capabilities: [e0] Vendor Specific Information 00:02.0 Class 0300: 8086:27a2 (rev 03) Subsystem: 1028:01bd Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 169 Memory at dff0 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=512K] I/O ports at eff8 [size=8] Memory at c000 (32-bit, prefetchable) [size=256M] Memory at dfec (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=256K] Capabilities: [90] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit- Queue=0/0 Enable- Capabilities: [d0] Power Management version 2 00:02.1 Class 0380: 8086:27a6 (rev 03) Subsystem: 1028:01bd Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Memory at dff8 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=512K] Capabilities: [d0] Power Management version 2 00:1b.0 Class 0403: 8086:27d8 (rev 01) Subsystem: 1028:01bd Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 225 Memory at dfebc000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K] Capabilities: [50] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [60] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit+ Queue=0/0 Enable- Capabilities: [70] Express Unknown type IRQ 0 Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel Capabilities: [130] Unknown (5) 00:1c.0 Class 0604: 8086:27d0 (rev 01) Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Bus: primary=00, secondary=0b, subordinate=0b, sec-latency=0 Memory behind bridge: dfd0-dfdf Capabilities: [40] Express Root Port (Slot+) IRQ 0 Capabilities: [80] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit- Queue=0/0 Enable+ Capabilities: [90] #0d [] Capabilities: [a0] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel Capabilities: [180] Unknown (5) 00:1c.3 Class 0604: 8086:27d6 (rev 01) Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0 Bus: primary=00, secondary=0c, subordinate=0d, sec-latency=0 I/O behind bridge: d000-dfff Memory behind bridge: dfa0-dfcf Prefetchable memory behind bridge: d000-d010 Capabilities: [40] Express Root Port (Slot+) IRQ 0 Capabilities: [80] Message Signalled Interrupts: 64bit- Queue=0/0 Enable+ Capabilities: [90] #0d [] Capabilities: [a0] Power Management version 2 Capabilities: [100] Virtual Channel Capabilities: [180] Unknown (5) 00:1d.0 Class 0c03: 8086:27c8 (rev 01) Subsystem: 1028:01bd Flags: bus master, medium devsel, latency 0, IRQ 217 I/O ports at bf80 [size=32] 00:1d.1 Class 0c03: 8086:27c9 (rev 01) Subsystem: 1028:01bd Flags: bus m
Bug#396327: FSC Lifebook S7020
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 09:40, Bjoern Boschman wrote: > Comments/Problems: > > speedstep modules not loaded. suspend and hibernate non-functional That is currently not part nor a goal of the installation. You are expected to set this up yourself afterwards. As the installation was otherwise successful, I'm closing your report. Thank you very much for submitting it. Cheers, FJP -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#396365: please add a gdb .udeb, for easier debugging inside d-i
Hello Daniel, I am glad you took this to the debian-boot mailing list as Sven Luther, who currently is not even a member of the Debian Installer team, filed this request without discussing it on the debian-boot list first. As such, this is an "unauthorized" request. On Tuesday 31 October 2006 20:44, Joey Hess wrote: > Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > > If they did that, you could just wget a full GDB binary. It doesn't > > need anything else in the package besides the executable. But I > > don't think d-i does what you describe (since I tried to use this > > approach for strace recently, and there were missing symbols in > > libc.so.6). > > I don't see any benefit to having a udeb, beyond being able to load the > udeb in anna. Please take this conclusion from Joey Hess as the final statement on this request. It would have limited benefits, but not enough to warrant the creation and the maintenance of the udeb. Feel free to either close this BR or mark it wontfix. Cheers, Frans Pop Debian Installer Release Manager pgpPliMFlu0bS.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: miboot net-install floppies too big
Hi, well the good news is that somebody shrank the net-drivers.img, and it builds properly too, see: people.debian.org/~wouter/d-i/powerpc-miboot/2006-10-30/build_powerpc_floppy_net-drivers.log Don't know who did it or how, but thank you. Unfortunately the modules in the floppy are for linux-image-2.6.17-2-powerpc-miboot-di, which, here it comes, won't boot. Nothing, just gets spat out. Not even a debug message. Oh well, at least this problem is straight forward. I guess I'll fill out a bug report. Rob _ Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE! http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: r42375 - trunk/packages/po
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Christian Perrier написа: > Quoting Damyan Ivanov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >> [I'm not subscribed to -boot] > > You maybe should. At least you should be subscribed to -i18n to get > important announcements. I am subscribed to -i18n, yes. I can't wait to see Bulgarian translation progressing up :) - -boot seems too high traffic for me. I posted here regardless, since here as I see it the proper place to ask questions about the daily builds. >>> You should work outside your SVN checkout tree. Put your bg.po file in >>> a work directory. Update/complete it. >>> >>> Then go back to you SVN checkout, run a "svn up" there.and *then* >>> put your new bg.po file and *then* run a "svn commit". >> This is perhaps OK in a string freeze period, but normally, I'd like >> to receive the updates, not overwrite them. Taking special care of > > Don't worry, updates will be resynced later when the next automated > sync will happen, so even if you overwrite new or modified strings in > your update, they'll be updated later. Right, but I'd miss the fact that something changed. And next "svn up" will result in (possible) conflicts anyway. Either way, I promise to be extra careful when committing. dam - -- Damyan Ivanov Modular Software Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone +359(2)928-2611, 929-3993 fax +359(2)920-0994 mobile +359(88)856-6067 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/Gaim -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFR6VeHqjlqpcl9jsRAuE8AKC5NBf6M/7mkRYJNBhoBKSaoaos0wCfbriQ hHic8OtlEIa955P+2KY8tuQ= =La7z -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396307: installation-report: does not recover properly from broken d-i mirror
reassign 396307choose-mirror severity 396307 minor thanks On Tuesday 31 October 2006 04:57, Ratiu Petru wrote: > I used a preseed setup based on Joey Hess's scripts and pointed both > d-i mirror/http/hostname and base-config apt-setup/hostname to my local > apt-proxy URL. However, Packages.gz had the wrong checksum (probably a > stale file) and I was presented with a menu with 3 options: Retry, > Choose another mirror (or something along this line), and Cancel. > However, when I chose the second option, it kept trying the apt-proxy > mirror and failing, without prompting me for a different url. I tend to > believe that this is not the expected behaviour, preseeding or not. This is expected behavior with preseeding as the question is marked as seen. You are supposed to make sure your environment is "clean" and working when using preseeding. When an error occurs during a preseeded install, the only method to "recover" that is guaranteed to work is: abort the install, fix the error and retry. However, in this case I guess we could "reset" the questions in case of an error so that they will be asked and current values can be changed. This is a low priority issue though. Thanks for the report. pgpaTMIlXKb2D.pgp Description: PGP signature
Processed (with 1 errors): Re: Bug#396307: installation-report: does not recover properly from broken d-i mirror
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > reassign 396307choose-mirror Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > severity 396307 minor Bug#396307: installation-report: does not recover properly from broken d-i mirror Severity set to `minor' from `normal' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396294: Package: installation-reports
On Tuesday 31 October 2006 06:34, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > Should I try the nightlies? > > > > Yes, please to. > > Shouldn't we close that bug report? I expect the submitter will follow up after trying a daily image. Let's wait for that. pgpxVRLmKJZ6K.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: Bug#396365: please add a gdb .udeb, for easier debugging inside d-i
Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > If they did that, you could just wget a full GDB binary. It doesn't > need anything else in the package besides the executable. But I don't > think d-i does what you describe (since I tried to use this approach > for strace recently, and there were missing symbols in libc.so.6). d-i reduces libc for the boot image, but then loads a full one from install media/network. So if you want to debug something before the full libc is available, you're SOL. However, d-i also already offers a way to include a strace, gdb, or whatever you want onto the boot image, without a udeb, and including any dependant symbols and other libraries: # This variable can be used to copy in additional files from the system # that is doing the build. Useful if you need to include strace, or gdb, # etc. #EXTRAFILES = /usr/bin/strace > If someone more familiar with d-i than I am can confirm that the udeb > will be useful, I can try to get GDB to build one, but it seems like > a very strange package to have a udeb. I don't see any benefit to having a udeb, beyond being able to load the udeb in anna. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: r42375 - trunk/packages/po
Quoting Damyan Ivanov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > [I'm not subscribed to -boot] You maybe should. At least you should be subscribed to -i18n to get important announcements. > > You should work outside your SVN checkout tree. Put your bg.po file in > > a work directory. Update/complete it. > > > > Then go back to you SVN checkout, run a "svn up" there.and *then* > > put your new bg.po file and *then* run a "svn commit". > > This is perhaps OK in a string freeze period, but normally, I'd like > to receive the updates, not overwrite them. Taking special care of Don't worry, updates will be resynced later when the next automated sync will happen, so even if you overwrite new or modified strings in your update, they'll be updated later. > > Or, should I simply overwrite XX.po as you suggest and later merge any > new strings from template.pot? I thought the point of the > synchronizing scripts was exactly to spare the manual merge. That's their point, yes. However, the sync only happens twice a day. > > this error by running: > > > > msgfmt -o /dev/null -c --statistics bg.po > > > > before committing it. Please always check your PO files this way > > before committing them. > > Point taken. Sorry for losing your time. No problem. I take this as investiment for the future..:) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Problem with SVN repository
> I created a guest account on https://alioth.debian.org and when I try to do: > $ svn co svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/d-i/trunk > A password I use to log into the alioth service is not the correct password > for ssh - as I should guess ;) > Do I need a developer account to get this work? Alioth admins may have de-activated password-based logins on alioth since the server relocation. In such case, you need to put a SSH pubkey at the right place in your account on Alioth (from the pae where you manage your account settings). signature.asc Description: Digital signature
http://wiki.debian.org/SvenLutherAndDI (Was: Open Letter to Anthony Towns about the d-i mediation ...)
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 11:22:30AM +, MJ Ray wrote: > Please do not take these requests as an insult to anyone - I simply > haven't been paying this topic much attention for months (and suspect > many other readers haven't been doing so either), so I'd like to see > some recent examples. Well, on various suggestions, i have written the following text : http://wiki.debian.org/SvenLutherAndDI Which i will try to improve and complete, accordying to remarks and questions people may ask me about this. For those awaiting evil gossip, you will be strongly disapointed though, since i have decided to not go and add links of those bashings and other not-nice things frans has said about me, but instead, i have written what i believe is a reasonable explanation of why my commit should be re-activated, including information on all the bugs and patches i commited accordying to the rules sets up by the DPL during the mediation, which as you will see ammount to quite a lot, and the sad fact that there was no-one able to take an active d-i powerpc porter lead role, even after all these months. As a conclusion, i believe that the above page clearly shows why my d-i svn commit access should be restored, and that this sad dispute should be forgotten, as i hope we are all mature enough to be able to set aside past differences, and work together for the bettering of debian (and no, the current climate of flamewars and GRs-for-every-flightly-excuse does not contribute to that). So, again, i ask that this issue is but to a stop, that my svn commit access to the d-i repository is restored, that frans stops his provocations against me, and that we go back to coding hapily ever after. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: D-I - Official warning not to upload any packages containing udebs
Op 30-10-2006 om 13:53 schreef Sven Luther: > On Mon, Oct 30, 2006 at 11:28:34AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote: > > [ reasonable E-mail about how Sven Luther postings are recieved ] > > This really helps to be able to concentrate and work. But as I am again now > > wasting my time again on your stupid "mission" (though only 5mins for this > > mail) I am seriously thinking about marking all mails as read which refer > > to > > any msgid of yours. > > And what will you gain by this ? People like you are so feedup with my mails, > like it was the ultimate crime or something. And on the other side, people > like Alphix say this does not concern them, so they ignore it. > > But why are you letting Frans handle me like dirt ? Why did you, you the d-i > team, let this messy situation drag on for months ? You cannot honestly > complain about these recurring threads, while on the same time supporting > frans in his current behaviour ? > > At least you could have said something too to him, or something. > > > Sven, you hurt the powerpc port more than anybody else. > > Holger, i extremely recent that. I like you and have respect for you, but > really, i would very much like you to think about what has been going on for > months now, and then come back here and say the same. > > Friendly, but hurt, > > Sven Luther > > At least you could have said something too to him, or something. | At least you could have said something to Frans, or something. Frans, I would understand your P.O.V. if you ignored Sven Luther completely. GSt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: It takes two to fight^Wtango
Op 29-10-2006 om 22:58 schreef Sven Luther: > On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 10:46:43PM +0100, Geert Stappers wrote: > > Allow me to express my observation: > > > >I see an energy drain. > >The sad thing is that the energy going to the fight, > >doesn't go the thing this mailinglist is about: > > > > debian-installer > > Geert, even though i know that you right now strongly dislike me, i do > appreciate you a lot. > > I wonder why you didn't make this kind of observation when Frans goes in > another round of sven-bashing though ? FYI: My interest is a good installer. Further information: d-i is made by individuals. An individual having a hard time ignoring another idividual ... -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#396365: please add a gdb .udeb, for easier debugging inside d-i
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:09:46PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Sven Luther wrote: > > My impression is that d-i loads the full libraries later on, or something > > such. > > AFAIK, this never happens. The reduction is done mainly for the thing > not to be too big in the memory while running. Hi Eddy, I wonder how the current situation works for .udebs not in the image ? How do you find out whose symbols are used by them and know not to strip them ? Is this just luck ? I sincerely doubt that. > > In any case if you have a better idea on how to do this, maybe having a > > statically built gdb, it would be welcome too. > > A statically built gdb is he way to go, IMHO. > > If you'd want a udeb for gdb, then the library reduction should take > into account its dependencies (symbols). This would mean: > - - either you make a custom image which uses mklibs-copy (no reduction) > and you can use a regular binary or a gdb udeb which contains just the > gdb binary (dynamically linked) > - - build a custom image with gdb's needed symbols not stripped - but this > means that gdb could not be used for regulaly built images. We need a custom image anyway, since we need a -debug version of the binaries we want to debug. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#396365: please add a gdb .udeb, for easier debugging inside d-i
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 01:06:12PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > A version of gdb as .udeb, which could easily be loaded inside the d-i would > be very useful for developers. This would come in handy to debug various bugs > which are otherwise hard to track, like crashes in the graphical installer, > or problems like i am having right now, in parted/libparted, which only are > apparent inside the d-i environment. Is this really a good idea? It seems like the wrong way round; you could manually load a full GDB and associated libraries, if you need it for debugging, but having it as part of a d-i image would e.g. change the required bits of libraries. Hoping for feedback. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#396365: please add a gdb .udeb, for easier debugging inside d-i
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > So, i am not entirely sure how d-i handles the case at hand here, where > libraries are part of the actual image, but symbols are removed during > reduction, because they are not needed by the .udebs in the image, but they > are needed by .udebs loaded later on. > > My impression is that d-i loads the full libraries later on, or something > such. If they did that, you could just wget a full GDB binary. It doesn't need anything else in the package besides the executable. But I don't think d-i does what you describe (since I tried to use this approach for strace recently, and there were missing symbols in libc.so.6). If someone more familiar with d-i than I am can confirm that the udeb will be useful, I can try to get GDB to build one, but it seems like a very strange package to have a udeb. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#396365: please add a gdb .udeb, for easier debugging inside d-i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 05:09:46PM +0200, Eddy Petrișor wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Sven Luther wrote: >>> My impression is that d-i loads the full libraries later on, or something >>> such. >> AFAIK, this never happens. The reduction is done mainly for the thing >> not to be too big in the memory while running. > > Hi Eddy, > > I wonder how the current situation works for .udebs not in the image ? How do > you find out whose symbols are used by them and know not to strip them ? Is > this just luck ? I sincerely doubt that. No, is not luck, just that all udebs which could be used are added to the pool of binaries which need symbols, AFAICT: from build/Makefile : - 8<-- ifdef EXTRADRIVERS # Unpack the udebs of additional driver disks, so mklibs runs on them too. dpkg $(DPKG_UNPACK_OPTIONS) --log=/dev/null --root=$(EXTRAUDEBSDIR) - --unpack \ $(wildcard $(foreach dir,$(EXTRADRIVERS),$(dir)/*.udeb)) endif ifdef EXTRAUDEBS # Get and unpack extra udebs too. get-packages udeb $(EXTRAUDEBS) dpkg $(DPKG_UNPACK_OPTIONS) --log=/dev/null --root=$(EXTRAUDEBSDIR) - --unpack \ $(foreach udeb,$(EXTRAUDEBS),$(UDEBDIR)/$(udeb).udeb) endif - 8<-- >> If you'd want a udeb for gdb, then the library reduction should take >> into account its dependencies (symbols). This would mean: >> - - either you make a custom image which uses mklibs-copy (no reduction) >> and you can use a regular binary or a gdb udeb which contains just the >> gdb binary (dynamically linked) >> - - build a custom image with gdb's needed symbols not stripped - but this >> means that gdb could not be used for regulaly built images. > > We need a custom image anyway, since we need a -debug version of the > binaries we want to debug. Indeed - -- Regards, EddyP = "Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFR3EaY8Chqv3NRNoRAgObAKCwmdyQ3e8UFZL5tp3IScBRND07PQCfZQCc r2NSmb15+Bte4FU8COUOIiA= =Y5+O -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#396365: please add a gdb .udeb, for easier debugging inside d-i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: >> So, i am not entirely sure how d-i handles the case at hand here, where >> libraries are part of the actual image, but symbols are removed during >> reduction, because they are not needed by the .udebs in the image, but they >> are needed by .udebs loaded later on. >> >> My impression is that d-i loads the full libraries later on, or something >> such. > > If they did that, you could just wget a full GDB binary. It doesn't Note that networking might not be enabled at the point gdb is needed. placing the udeb/gdb statically linked binary on the CD might be helpful. > If someone more familiar with d-i than I am can confirm that the udeb > will be useful, I can try to get GDB to build one, but it seems like > a very strange package to have a udeb. Probably a udeb with a statically linked binary would be a package that might be somewhat useful. - -- Regards, EddyP = "Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFR2geY8Chqv3NRNoRAuPUAKDVSUQMISFCrro1pCGMIrjTIsYV3wCglUZ6 HRC7vZiu1qkHDz60qBSsUTs= =7EjR -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#396365: please add a gdb .udeb, for easier debugging inside d-i
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:36:54AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 03:30:23PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > So, i am not entirely sure how d-i handles the case at hand here, where > > libraries are part of the actual image, but symbols are removed during > > reduction, because they are not needed by the .udebs in the image, but they > > are needed by .udebs loaded later on. > > > > My impression is that d-i loads the full libraries later on, or something > > such. > > If they did that, you could just wget a full GDB binary. It doesn't Mmm. > need anything else in the package besides the executable. But I don't > think d-i does what you describe (since I tried to use this approach > for strace recently, and there were missing symbols in libc.so.6). I really don't see how reduction could work if it has to take into account all .udebs which can possibly or not be loaded into d-i. I also have not noticed the d-i build process loading not-in-the-ramdisk .udebs, but i have missed them. Also, i don't see how such a process could survive for example a package which was added after the build of the image, or modified or whatever. What did you do with strace ? Create a .udeb out of it and include this one ? or just load in the binary ? Or did you include the strace.udeb into the ramdisk image ? > If someone more familiar with d-i than I am can confirm that the udeb > will be useful, I can try to get GDB to build one, but it seems like > a very strange package to have a udeb. Well, gdb and strace would be two great packages to have as .udeb. Also, .udebs can be useful even outside of d-i, at least those not having any menu item thingy, like libraries, and utility packages (like ssh or parted or whatever for example). Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#396365: please add a gdb .udeb, for easier debugging inside d-i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sven Luther wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:05:26AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 01:06:12PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: >>> A version of gdb as .udeb, which could easily be loaded inside the d-i would >>> be very useful for developers. This would come in handy to debug various >>> bugs >>> which are otherwise hard to track, like crashes in the graphical installer, >>> or problems like i am having right now, in parted/libparted, which only are >>> apparent inside the d-i environment. >> Is this really a good idea? It seems like the wrong way round; you >> could manually load a full GDB and associated libraries, if you need >> it for debugging, but having it as part of a d-i image would e.g. >> change the required bits of libraries. > > Mmm, you mean the mklibs'ed library in the standard image, i hadn't thought of > that. > > My idea was not to include it by default, but to be able to load it in the > ramdisk, if needed, so as a .udeb in the archive, but *NOT* as part of the d-i > image. > > So, i am not entirely sure how d-i handles the case at hand here, where > libraries are part of the actual image, but symbols are removed during > reduction, because they are not needed by the .udebs in the image, but they > are needed by .udebs loaded later on. > > My impression is that d-i loads the full libraries later on, or something > such. AFAIK, this never happens. The reduction is done mainly for the thing not to be too big in the memory while running. > In any case if you have a better idea on how to do this, maybe having a > statically built gdb, it would be welcome too. A statically built gdb is he way to go, IMHO. If you'd want a udeb for gdb, then the library reduction should take into account its dependencies (symbols). This would mean: - - either you make a custom image which uses mklibs-copy (no reduction) and you can use a regular binary or a gdb udeb which contains just the gdb binary (dynamically linked) - - build a custom image with gdb's needed symbols not stripped - but this means that gdb could not be used for regulaly built images. - -- Regards, EddyP = "Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFFR2c5Y8Chqv3NRNoRAhv0AJ9lmihF3fyS3OHr38zd4Hw7qeyPZwCg1l2q EaEljSty/gxAEMg7QTz7xFw= =Lowy -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#396365: please add a gdb .udeb, for easier debugging inside d-i
On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 09:05:26AM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote: > On Tue, Oct 31, 2006 at 01:06:12PM +0100, Sven Luther wrote: > > A version of gdb as .udeb, which could easily be loaded inside the d-i would > > be very useful for developers. This would come in handy to debug various > > bugs > > which are otherwise hard to track, like crashes in the graphical installer, > > or problems like i am having right now, in parted/libparted, which only are > > apparent inside the d-i environment. > > Is this really a good idea? It seems like the wrong way round; you > could manually load a full GDB and associated libraries, if you need > it for debugging, but having it as part of a d-i image would e.g. > change the required bits of libraries. Mmm, you mean the mklibs'ed library in the standard image, i hadn't thought of that. My idea was not to include it by default, but to be able to load it in the ramdisk, if needed, so as a .udeb in the archive, but *NOT* as part of the d-i image. So, i am not entirely sure how d-i handles the case at hand here, where libraries are part of the actual image, but symbols are removed during reduction, because they are not needed by the .udebs in the image, but they are needed by .udebs loaded later on. My impression is that d-i loads the full libraries later on, or something such. In any case if you have a better idea on how to do this, maybe having a statically built gdb, it would be welcome too. > Hoping for feedback. Hope this helps. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Info on partman/auto format
Hello,
Just for Information:
I set up a server (routing) with one drbd devices on sda . Now today i wanted
to install (management) with 3 drbd devices on sda 9 .. 11
over the routing server but get a kernel panic error
To exclude it from from the list (and to say to my boss, that's not causing
the error):
In method{ } it's also possible to use keep, so
i asume this is formating the partition ?!
[snap]
1 1 1 ext3 method{ format } format{ } use_
filesystem{ } filesystem{ ext3 } mountpoint{ /clstdmc } .
[snap]
Is there a parameter i can set in format{ } ?
@Frans: could you please give me a link to the documentation.You have maybe
better things to do, as to answer my questions ;-)
Thanks in advance
--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#395052: Please provide the GTK frontend with a better handler for BOOLEAN questions
Hi
Here is a cleaner patch for this bug: don't feel impressed/scared by the
number of changed lines, it's mostly due to re-indentation of code after
removing a couple of if()s.
This patch was tested by me during the whole past week and worked well.
Most important, this handler no longer erroneously updates the question
database like the current one does when the user checks/unchecks the
checkbox.
cheers
Attilio
Index: gtk.c
===
--- gtk.c (revisione 42389)
+++ gtk.c (copia locale)
@@ -374,16 +374,6 @@
gtk_main_quit();
}
-void check_toggled_callback (GtkWidget *toggle, gpointer data)
-{
-struct question *q = (struct question*)data;
-gboolean value;
-
-/* INFO(INFO_DEBUG, "GTK_DI - check_toggled_callback() called"); */
-value = gtk_toggle_button_get_active (GTK_TOGGLE_BUTTON(toggle));
-bool_setter (toggle, q);
-}
-
void boolean_single_callback(GtkWidget *button, struct frontend_question_data* data )
{
struct frontend *obj = data->obj;
@@ -612,23 +602,21 @@
gtk_widget_modify_base(GTK_WIDGET(ext_description_view), GTK_STATE_NORMAL, bg_color);
}
-/* here is created the question's description, unless question is BOOLEAN */
-if( strcmp(q->template->type, "boolean") != 0 ) {
-description_view = gtk_text_view_new ();
-description_buffer = gtk_text_view_get_buffer (GTK_TEXT_VIEW (description_view));
-gtk_text_buffer_set_text (description_buffer, q_get_description(q), -1);
-gtk_text_view_set_editable (GTK_TEXT_VIEW(description_view), FALSE);
-gtk_text_view_set_cursor_visible (GTK_TEXT_VIEW(description_view), FALSE);
-gtk_text_view_set_wrap_mode (GTK_TEXT_VIEW(description_view), GTK_WRAP_WORD);
-gtk_text_view_set_left_margin (GTK_TEXT_VIEW(description_view), 4);
-gtk_text_view_set_right_margin (GTK_TEXT_VIEW(description_view), 4);
-gtk_text_buffer_create_tag (description_buffer, "italic", "style", PANGO_STYLE_ITALIC, NULL);
-g_object_set_data (G_OBJECT (description_view), "tag", "italic");
-gtk_text_buffer_get_start_iter (description_buffer, &start);
-gtk_text_buffer_get_end_iter (description_buffer, &end);
-gtk_text_buffer_apply_tag_by_name (description_buffer, "italic", &start, &end);
-gtk_widget_modify_base(GTK_WIDGET(description_view), GTK_STATE_NORMAL, bg_color);
-}
+/* here is created the question's description */
+description_view = gtk_text_view_new ();
+description_buffer = gtk_text_view_get_buffer (GTK_TEXT_VIEW (description_view));
+gtk_text_buffer_set_text (description_buffer, q_get_description(q), -1);
+gtk_text_view_set_editable (GTK_TEXT_VIEW(description_view), FALSE);
+gtk_text_view_set_cursor_visible (GTK_TEXT_VIEW(description_view), FALSE);
+gtk_text_view_set_wrap_mode (GTK_TEXT_VIEW(description_view), GTK_WRAP_WORD);
+gtk_text_view_set_left_margin (GTK_TEXT_VIEW(description_view), 4);
+gtk_text_view_set_right_margin (GTK_TEXT_VIEW(description_view), 4);
+gtk_text_buffer_create_tag (description_buffer, "italic", "style", PANGO_STYLE_ITALIC, NULL);
+g_object_set_data (G_OBJECT (description_view), "tag", "italic");
+gtk_text_buffer_get_start_iter (description_buffer, &start);
+gtk_text_buffer_get_end_iter (description_buffer, &end);
+gtk_text_buffer_apply_tag_by_name (description_buffer, "italic", &start, &end);
+gtk_widget_modify_base(GTK_WIDGET(description_view), GTK_STATE_NORMAL, bg_color);
gtk_container_set_focus_chain(GTK_CONTAINER(description_box), NULL);
@@ -642,8 +630,7 @@
{
if (strlen (q_get_extended_description(q)) > 0)
gtk_box_pack_start(GTK_BOX (description_box), ext_description_view, FALSE, FALSE, 2);
-if( strcmp(q->template->type, "boolean") != 0 )
-gtk_box_pack_start(GTK_BOX (description_box), description_view, FALSE, FALSE, 3);
+gtk_box_pack_start(GTK_BOX (description_box), description_view, FALSE, FALSE, 3);
}
if ( strcmp(q->template->type,"note") == 0 )
@@ -665,7 +652,7 @@
static int gtkhandler_boolean(struct frontend *obj, struct question *q, GtkWidget *qbox)
{
-GtkWidget *description_box, *check, *hpadbox, *vpadbox;
+GtkWidget *description_box, *radio_false, *radio_true, *hpadbox, *vpadbox;
struct frontend_question_data *data;
const char *defval = question_getvalue(q, "");
@@ -675,30 +662,38 @@
data->obj = obj;
data->q = q;
-check = gtk_check_button_new_with_label(q_get_description(q));
-if (strcmp(defval, "true") == 0)
-gtk_toggle_button_set_active(GTK_TOGGLE_BUTTON(check), TRUE);
-else
-gtk_toggle_button_set_active(GTK_TOGGLE_BUTTON(check), FALSE);
+ radio_false = gtk_radio_button_new_with_label (NULL, question_get_text(obj, "debconf/no", "No"));
+ radio_true = gtk_radio_button_new_with_label_from_widget (GTK_RADIO_BUTTON (radio_fals
Bug#396071: segfaults when attempting to take a screenshot while wget is running
Robert Millan wrote:
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 09:14:57PM +0100, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote:
Frans Pop wrote:
reassign 396071 cdebconf-gtk-udeb
thanks
On Sunday 29 October 2006 17:23, Robert Millan wrote:
If you hit the Screenshot button while wget is fetching [1] your
mirror's Release file, d-i will segfault. Inmediately after that, you
see [2], and after a console switch, the d-i logs [3].
Known issue and the reason why the screenshot button is disabled when a
progress bar is running.
Apparently we are disabling the screenshot button too late here.
Reassigning to cdebconf-gtk-udeb as that is what causes the crash, and it
would be good to investigate the actual cause of the crash and seeing if
we can solve that. Disabling the button was only a workaround.
Note that in the mean time we may need to fix this in choose-mirror after
all by displaying a progress bar at this point.
Accessing the GdkWindow by a thread while the window is being updated by
another thread in the gtk_main_loop() causes crashes, and this is the
reason why i made the screenshot button disappear during a
progress_xxx() call, in fact past experiments aimed at gaining exclusive
access to the gdkwidow led to deadlocks between threads.
Robert, did you press the button before the progressbar was displayed or
were you able to press it while the progressbar was running?
When I pressed it no progress bar was being displayed. I don't know if one was
going to show up eventualy, but it was taking too much time and in fact the
system appeared to be hang because of this.
I've been able to reproduce the crash as Robert described it.
The problem is that i forgot to disable the screenshot button when
exiting from a frontend_go(), like i did for the "next" and "back" ones.
When the user clicks "back" or "next", the GTK application exits the
gtk's main loop and there the callback function associated to the
screenshot button, which is still active, causes the crash as expected.
This is also the reason why i disabled the screenshot button while a
progessbar is being updated: the callback would have arrived between two
progress_xxx() calls, outside gtk main loop.
The attached patch fixes this bug: the screenshot button is disabled
after the user exits from a questions, and a bit earlier than before to
prevent possible nasty timing issues.
cheers
attilio
Index: gtk.c
===
--- gtk.c (revisione 42389)
+++ gtk.c (copia locale)
@@ -1661,6 +1661,10 @@
gdk_threads_enter();
+gtk_widget_set_sensitive (data->button_prev, FALSE);
+gtk_widget_set_sensitive (data->button_next, FALSE);
+gtk_widget_set_sensitive (data->button_screenshot, FALSE);
+
if (data->button_val == DC_OK)
{
call_setters(obj);
@@ -1679,9 +1683,6 @@
else
gtk_widget_destroy(questionbox_scroll);
-gtk_widget_set_sensitive (data->button_prev, FALSE);
-gtk_widget_set_sensitive (data->button_next, FALSE);
-
gdk_threads_leave();
if (data->button_val == DC_OK)
Open letter to the debian-installer team, do we really need to drag this petty conflict so much longer ?
Hi Debian-installer team members. As you all know, there is a petty dispute going on between me and frans (and maybe a few silent others), and this issue has been open since over 6 months now, and there seems to be no end in sight. Some (like Alphix), have said they feel not concerned by this, while frans and a few others insist it is not a personal issue, i don't really know what to think about it, but my own impression is that the only thing really at issue at this point, and so long after the events, are frans's pride, and my frustration at being unable to properly and efficiently working on debian-installer and fixing bugs nobody else seems to be caring about. Anyway, the fact that we are still having this issue months after the facts, and despite me working constructively and within the constraints imposed to me by the DPL mediation, just shows that the current situation is broken, and that there is no hope of it ever getting solved, and that the original mediation proposal was flawed, as i warned about so many months back. As long as Frans is at the same time judge and party to the dispute, and given the fact that he seems unable to admit his own errors in this mess, there will never be a problem, and Frans will continue to constantly provoke me, and i will from time to time be unable to resist responding to said provocations. So, do we really want this to be dragged on forever ? I don't think so, i believe everyone, including me, is sick to death about this. I thus make the following proposal : 1) someone neutral or maybe a neutral committee or whatever, is the one in charge of judging me, and does so honestly and publicly. 2) frans stops immediately his provocations against me. 3) at some predefined time, those judging the issue, will do so. This needs to be some finite and clearly stated time, though. My personal opinion in this is that 6 months would have been well enough, if not for the fact that frans is both the judge on this, and has been provoking me voluntarily during this whole time. 4) if frans behaves badly, then those judging it should not be afraid to say so, and frans should accept the reprimand for it. 5) nobody gets offended when technical proposals are discussed, even if those proposals are not within the official dogma. We are all sick of this, i have been trying to be positive and constructive since months now, but there is really no hope of it ever going better, so let's all remember what we promised in the social contract, that we would put free software and our users as our priority, and set aside those personal petty disputes, so we can all again concentrate on doing the best technical work we can. In hope of finding fair and reasonable readers, ... Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Problem with SVN repository
Dnia poniedziałek 30 października 2006 21:59, Joey Hess napisał: > Maciej Barnim Kosmulski wrote: > > I have a problem to make a checkout on d-i repository. > > > > $ svn co svn://svn.debian.org/d-i/trunk > > svn: Can't connect to host 'svn.debian.org': Connection refused > > > > Does anybody know whether I'am doing sth wrong or the SVN server is > > temporarily down? > > Alioth was moved to a new server whose ISP unfortunatly blocks the port > used for svn://. You'll need to use svn+ssh:// for now (which needs an > alioth account). Its admins are trying to get this fixed.. I created a guest account on https://alioth.debian.org and when I try to do: $ svn co svn+ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/d-i/trunk A password I use to log into the alioth service is not the correct password for ssh - as I should guess ;) Do I need a developer account to get this work? ./Barnim P.s. I'm working on adapting d-i to the cdlinux.pl distribution (which is a LiveCD based on Debian) for educational purposes. -- Maciej Barnim Kosmulski
Bug#396340: choose-mirror doesn't allow to use a d-i only mirror for .udebs.
Package: choose-mirror Severity: normal I have a local mirror of the .udeb debian-installer repo, and want to use this one for d-i testing, and another mirror for the full debian archive. I thought i would set the mirror to my local .udeb archive, and then later change it in expert mode to the debian archive, to get all the .debs. choose-mirror did not let me do this though, and gave me an error message saying that my mirror doesn't support my architecture, and the log showed it checked for the main .deb archive, not the .udeb one. Friendly, Sven Luther -- System Information: Debian Release: testing/unstable APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: powerpc (ppc) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Kernel: Linux 2.6.15-1-powerpc Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#395886: Further Info for bug 395886
Hallo System AMD Opteron 175 on MSI K8N Neo4, nvidia graphics lspci: :00:00.0 Memory controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 Memory Controller (rev a3) :00:01.0 ISA bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 ISA Bridge (rev a3) :00:01.1 SMBus: nVidia Corporation CK804 SMBus (rev a2) :00:02.0 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a2) :00:02.1 USB Controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 USB Controller (rev a3) :00:04.0 Multimedia audio controller: nVidia Corporation CK804 AC'97 Audio Controller (rev a2) :00:06.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 IDE (rev f2) :00:07.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 Serial ATA Controller (rev f3) :00:08.0 IDE interface: nVidia Corporation CK804 Serial ATA Controller (rev f3) :00:09.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCI Bridge (rev a2) :00:0a.0 Bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 Ethernet Controller (rev a3) :00:0b.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3) :00:0c.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3) :00:0d.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3) :00:0e.0 PCI bridge: nVidia Corporation CK804 PCIE Bridge (rev a3) :00:18.0 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration :00:18.1 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Address Map :00:18.2 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] DRAM Controller :00:18.3 Host bridge: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/Opteron] Miscellaneous Control :01:0c.0 FireWire (IEEE 1394): VIA Technologies, Inc. IEEE 1394 Host Controller (rev 80) :01:0d.0 RAID bus controller: Silicon Image, Inc. SiI 3114 [SATALink/SATARaid] Serial ATA Controller (rev 02) :03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Marvell Technology Group Ltd. 88E8053 Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 15) :05:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation GeForce 6200 TurboCache(TM) (rev a1) lspci -n: :00:00.0 0580: 10de:005e (rev a3) :00:01.0 0601: 10de:0050 (rev a3) :00:01.1 0c05: 10de:0052 (rev a2) :00:02.0 0c03: 10de:005a (rev a2) :00:02.1 0c03: 10de:005b (rev a3) :00:04.0 0401: 10de:0059 (rev a2) :00:06.0 0101: 10de:0053 (rev f2) :00:07.0 0101: 10de:0054 (rev f3) :00:08.0 0101: 10de:0055 (rev f3) :00:09.0 0604: 10de:005c (rev a2) :00:0a.0 0680: 10de:0057 (rev a3) :00:0b.0 0604: 10de:005d (rev a3) :00:0c.0 0604: 10de:005d (rev a3) :00:0d.0 0604: 10de:005d (rev a3) :00:0e.0 0604: 10de:005d (rev a3) :00:18.0 0600: 1022:1100 :00:18.1 0600: 1022:1101 :00:18.2 0600: 1022:1102 :00:18.3 0600: 1022:1103 :01:0c.0 0c00: 1106:3044 (rev 80) :01:0d.0 0104: 1095:3114 (rev 02) :03:00.0 0200: 11ab:4362 (rev 15) :05:00.0 0300: 10de:0161 (rev a1) df -Tf: FilesystemType blocchi di 1K Usati Disponib. Uso% Montato su /dev/sda7 ext348062440 4372332 41248632 10% / varrun tmpfs 51422888514140 1% /var/run varlock tmpfs 514228 4514224 1% /var/lock udev tmpfs 514228 132514096 1% /dev devshm tmpfs 514228 0514228 0% /dev/shm lrm tmpfs 514228 21532492696 5% /lib/modules/2.6.15-27-amd64-k8/volatile /dev/sda6 ext3 4807056141332 4421540 4% /boot /dev/sda9 ext328834716 4778908 22591084 18% /home /dev/sda1 ntfs20482840 6085060 14397780 30% /media/sda1 /dev/sda5 vfat20472816 1427248 19045568 7% /media/sda5 /dev/sda10 reiserfs39060816 3380840 35679976 9% /prt2 /dev/sda11ext377000740 17185188 55904128 24% /video /home none28834716 4778908 22591084 18% /chroot/home /tmp none48062440 4372332 41248632 10% /chroot/tmp /dev none 514228 132514096 1% /chroot/dev /media/cdrom0 none48062440 4372332 41248632 10% /chroot/media/cdrom0 /usr/share/fonts none48062440 4372332 41248632 10% /chroot/usr/share/fonts [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#396327: FSC Lifebook S7020
Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD-netinstall Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso Date: Di Okt 31 09:24:07 CET 2006 Machine: FSC Lifebook S7020 Processor: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.73GHz (centrino) Memory: 1027164 kB Partitions: /dev/sda2 ext316626988 2695212 13087160 18% / udev tmpfs 1024068 10172 1% /dev devshm tmpfs 513580 0513580 0% /dev/shm Output of lspci -nn and lspci -vnn attached Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: speedstep modules not loaded. suspend and hibernate non-functional Cheers Bjoern lspci-nn.txt Description: PGP signature lspci-vnn.txt Description: PGP signature
Re: r42375 - trunk/packages/po
[I'm not subscribed to -boot] Christian Perrier -- 31.10.2006 08:00 --: > Quoting Damyan Ivanov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): >> Author: dam-guest >> Date: Mon Oct 30 23:50:51 2006 >> New Revision: 42375 >> >> Modified: >>trunk/packages/po/bg.po >> Log: >> More corrections to Bulgarian translation (l1). Still more to come, but this >> is useful to the point to be released as is > > No, it is not that useful, I'm afraid: > > You committed a file that contains SVN conflict markers. This probably Sorry about that. I am sure I resolved any conflicts, before committing, but anyway... > You should work outside your SVN checkout tree. Put your bg.po file in > a work directory. Update/complete it. > > Then go back to you SVN checkout, run a "svn up" there.and *then* > put your new bg.po file and *then* run a "svn commit". This is perhaps OK in a string freeze period, but normally, I'd like to receive the updates, not overwrite them. Taking special care of conflict resolution, this should be no problem any more. Or, should I simply overwrite XX.po as you suggest and later merge any new strings from template.pot? I thought the point of the synchronizing scripts was exactly to spare the manual merge. > Also, I found out that even when correcting these conflicts, the bg.po > file has 83 fuzzy strings. Is that intended? I am working on these. (And they were here when I started as translator) > I will correct the current bg.po file in the SVN so that it doesn't > break the sync scripts like it does currently. You should have found Thanks. > this error by running: > > msgfmt -o /dev/null -c --statistics bg.po > > before committing it. Please always check your PO files this way > before committing them. Point taken. Sorry for losing your time. dam -- Damyan Ivanov Modular Software Systems [EMAIL PROTECTED] phone +359(2)928-2611, 929-3993 fax +359(2)920-0994 mobile +359(88)856-6067 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/Gaim signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug#396294: Package: installation-reports
Quoting Frans Pop ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Tuesday 31 October 2006 01:01, Alexander Antoniades wrote: > > Comments/Problems: > > The install didn't get far because it couldn't get past the CD > > detection. This was with beta 3. As far as I know this is pretty > > standard sata. > > > > Should I try the nightlies? > > Yes, please to. Shouldn't we close that bug report? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
