Processed: setting package to rootskel rootskel-bootfloppy, tagging 394971
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.9.26 package rootskel rootskel-bootfloppy Ignoring bugs not assigned to: rootskel-bootfloppy rootskel tags 394971 + pending Bug#394971: [powerpc64] load the fan control modules. There were no tags set. Tags added: pending End of message, stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#400124: Buttons in the GTK frontend are not properly setup
On Thursday 23 November 2006 23:34, Attilio Fiandrotti wrote: Hiding them, as it's done now, has no effect, and this should be fixed because it's wrong. The attached patch also takes care of hiding ok, back and screenshot buttons while the progressbar is running and CAPB progresscancel is not set (it makes no sense, IMHO, displaying disabled buttons) I have no problem with applying this patch. If it breaks things we can always revert ;-) Cheers, FJP pgpH0XUw3kFjt.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: IMPORTANT: Significant changes to CD/DVD build setup
On Nov 23, 2006, at 1:52 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote: The system as it's set up now will increment a build number for each build it does, resetting to 1 again as the day changes. Hopefully that will suffice for you...? That will work. Enjoy! Rick -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#394971: [powerpc64] load the fan control modules
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 09:37:04PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: So, if you want to solve this, don't propose to commit my patch, but speak to frans, and beat some decency and maturity into him. How you can be sure if I hadn't done it? I did it already too many times. How can i know ? Frans seems to be a black hole, and the only return i get from him are hardly encouraging, of the FUCK YOU variety. Others may have been speaking to frans, but how should i know ? The way you're dealing with others and now with me isn't good. I'm trying hard to make all this mess to work and trying to bring the fan patch in with you but you insist to blame everyone instead to fix the last patch hook. There is only one way to make this mess work, and this is for frans to stop behaving like a dictator, and restore my svn commit access. He is not able to do so by himself apparently, so others need to force him to do that. I'm not talking about Frans but me. I've been decent with you and others and tryed hard to make things better to you and others too so please, come back to work as I'm doing now. Yeah, you are offering to me more of the same i have been doing since 6 months now. I appreciate your time and help, but this is not going to help in any way. I have proven that i can play by the submit patch route, and frans has proven repeteadly that he can make a mess out of it, ignoring the patches for week, and then suddenly making demands to me that it should be fixed immediately. I am right now not able to work on the patch until this WE, because i am not home, because i have a heavy RL work charge, for a wide variety of reasons. Furthermore, the XServe will go into production early next week, so there is a limited time window for me to fix things. All this would not have happened if i was able to commit stuff, and if frans was more honest in his dealing with me and my patches. My demand is the same it has been since months now, there is *NO REASONABLE REASON* for which the svn commit access has been taken away from me, as thus it should immediately be restored. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#394971: [powerpc64] load the fan control modules
On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 09:13:42PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Thu, Nov 23, 2006 at 06:22:56PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: Sven Luther [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Index: src/lib/debian-installer-startup.d/Makefile === --- src/lib/debian-installer-startup.d/Makefile (revision 42042) +++ src/lib/debian-installer-startup.d/Makefile (working copy) @@ -32,7 +32,8 @@ ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU),powerpc) files += \ -S45keyboard-linux-powerpc +S05fancontrol-linux-powerpc \ +S45keyboard-linux-powerpc endif ifneq (,$(filter mips mipsel,$(DEB_HOST_ARCH_CPU))) Same error as before. Please, review the patch and remove the directfb change since it's unrelated to this patch. Indeed, it was just a quick change. But i am sure that this could be fixed easily enough by anyone of good faith. Colin has done more drastic changes to my patches, and frans also tried to modify others of my changes. Again, there is no valid reason for not having modified this silently, this is just a cheap excuse for justifying the continuous unfair marginalizing of my work and as thus our powerpc users. Well, this isn't right. I have no time to work on this and test it until this WE. I told you so. What do you expect from me ? That i jump, drop my work here, travel 3 hours by train to go home, fix the patch and test it and recommit it ? Furthermore, as you see above, this bit of patch is fixed. Frans cited the problem. I cited the problem and then you send the If frans had informed me of the problem instead of reverting the upload, then you would have had a point. Given that he didn't do that, sorry, but this are only bad excuses. patch with same error and blame me? Sorry Sven but you're using every oportunity to blame everyone. No, i don't blame you. you seem eager for me to fix the problem, but are ignoring that i am not able to work on it until this WE. Please fix the patch instead of blame me, ok? Sure, but please understand that i am not able to do so until this WE. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#400154: tasksel: Should replace firefox by iceweasel
Package: tasksel Version: 2.58 Severity: important The firefox packages have now been replaced by iceweasel. We should therefore do something like s/firefox/iceweasel in all tasks. -- System Information: Debian Release: 4.0 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-2-686 Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to fr_FR.UTF-8) Versions of packages tasksel depends on: ii aptitude 0.4.4-1terminal-based apt frontend ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.9 Debian configuration management sy ii liblocale-gettext-perl1.05-1 Using libc functions for internati ii tasksel-data 2.58 Official tasks used for installati tasksel recommends no packages. -- debconf information excluded -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#400079: Processed: Re: Bug#400079: [INTL:tlh] Wolof debconf templates translation
retitle 400079 [INTL:wo] Wolof debconf templates translation thanks Wolof is not Klingon..:-)...Thanks Steve, who reads every single bit sent to the BTS signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Processed: Re: Bug#400079: [INTL:tlh] Wolof debconf templates translation
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: retitle 400079 [INTL:wo] Wolof debconf templates translation Bug#400079: [INTL:tlh] Wolof debconf templates translation Changed Bug title. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
