Re: Bug#436033: installation-guide: url to gpl on FSF site is wrong now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12-08-2007 12:12, Holger Wansing wrote: > On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:18:35 +0200 Christian Perrier wrote: >> Unless faw (Felipe Augusto van de Wiel, now in charge of the >> installation guide) objects, I think it is OK for you to commit the >> needed fix. >> > > Ok, if noone objects during the next two weeks, I will commit > attached patch. That's fine, go ahead and commit it. Kind regards, - -- Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) "Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom!" -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGv4dpCjAO0JDlykYRAmncAJ45vkBvuHwX+L2gdVnQzy7h02VqEwCgl7dN /DMezN+69mv/2FgosihZUGs= =F8vK -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#434027: marked as done (partman-crypto: loop-aes fails with "not supported by kernel")
Your message dated Sun, 12 Aug 2007 18:47:05 + with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#434027: fixed in partman-crypto 22 has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: partman-crypto Severity: important Using the daily d-i build with a businesscard image to install lenny, My desired configuration is as follows: /boot unencrypted loop-aes #1 AES256, GPG key loop-aes #2 AES256, random key d-i tells me that it is preparing #1 but after generating enough randomness it fails with "An error has occured while configuring encrypted volumes." The syslog shows partman-crypto: ioctl: LOOP_SET_STATUS: Invalid argument, requested cipher or key length (256 bits) not supported by kernel. d-i Kernel: Linux 2.6.21-2-486 #1 Wed Jul 11 03:17:09 UTC 2007 i686 unknown --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: partman-crypto Source-Version: 22 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of partman-crypto, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive: partman-crypto-dm_22_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-dm_22_all.udeb partman-crypto-loop_22_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-loop_22_all.udeb partman-crypto_22.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_22.dsc partman-crypto_22.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_22.tar.gz partman-crypto_22_i386.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_22_i386.udeb A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Max Vozeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (supplier of updated partman-crypto package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing [EMAIL PROTECTED]) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.7 Date: Sun, 12 Aug 2007 20:31:48 +0200 Source: partman-crypto Binary: partman-crypto-dm partman-crypto partman-crypto-loop Architecture: source all i386 Version: 22 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Max Vozeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Description: partman-crypto - Add to partman support for block device encryption (udeb) partman-crypto-dm - Add to partman support for dm-crypt encryption (udeb) partman-crypto-loop - Add to partman support for loop-AES encryption (udeb) Closes: 434027 Changes: partman-crypto (22) unstable; urgency=low . [ Frans Pop ] * For hd-media installs the module loop will already be loaded, which prevents loop-aes from being loaded. Attempt to replace loop with loop-aes by unmounting the CD image, replacing the module and remounting the image. As losetup is not available, we cannot check what exactly is loop-mounted, so we just assume that loop is only used for a CD image. Many thanks to Nemui Ailin for identifying the issue. Closes: #434027. . [ Colin Watson ] * Use 'mkdir -p' rather than more awkward test-then-create constructions. Files: 136a3bfd6fba3dd1085368170bbfdcb4 681 debian-installer standard partman-crypto_22.dsc 15f416de449e94d42178322fd0cd056b 252540 debian-installer standard partman-crypto_22.tar.gz 8953d4353283292ed01668d4b560bf7d 1390 debian-installer optional partman-crypto-dm_22_all.udeb 4a82d3d2e28b14f7f6a1d23cd5dbd971 1226 debian-installer optional partman-crypto-loop_22_all.udeb b0b648dc4f02c6ec106e3c1c834d04d5 224076 debian-installer standard partman-crypto_22_i386.udeb Package-Type: udeb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGv1J8nVvVEbfNotwRAqnvAKDd+XwXSB2qwNegVjZe/DVEPIXRDwCfQ6sD gi9JqL90NII5pHCz/zR58nQ= =7Ar5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- --- End Message ---
partman-crypto_22_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: partman-crypto-dm_22_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-dm_22_all.udeb partman-crypto-loop_22_all.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto-loop_22_all.udeb partman-crypto_22.dsc to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_22.dsc partman-crypto_22.tar.gz to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_22.tar.gz partman-crypto_22_i386.udeb to pool/main/p/partman-crypto/partman-crypto_22_i386.udeb Override entries for your package: partman-crypto-dm_22_all.udeb - optional debian-installer partman-crypto-loop_22_all.udeb - optional debian-installer partman-crypto_22.dsc - source debian-installer partman-crypto_22_i386.udeb - standard debian-installer Announcing to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Closing bugs: 434027 Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processing of partman-crypto_22_i386.changes
partman-crypto_22_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-crypto_22.dsc partman-crypto_22.tar.gz partman-crypto-dm_22_all.udeb partman-crypto-loop_22_all.udeb partman-crypto_22_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: merging bugs about incorrect swap warning message
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 396138 normal Bug#396138: partman-crypto: Swap message is confusing Severity set to `normal' from `minor' > merge 396138 414309 Bug#396138: partman-crypto: Swap message is confusing Bug#414309: cannot configure encrypted volume if stray swap exists Merged 396138 414309. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: retitle 414638
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > retitle 414638 partman-crypto: cryptsetup fails for encrypted non-ext2 /tmp Bug#414638: installation daily 2007-03-11 amd64 Changed Bug title to `partman-crypto: cryptsetup fails for encrypted non-ext2 /tmp' from `installation daily 2007-03-11 amd64'. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug#395024: marked as done (Bug with encrypted swap)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:54:10 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#395024: Bug with encrypted swap has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD (iso image inside vmware) Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso Date: downloaded 2006-10-24 11:30 AM UTC+1 Machine: IBM T40p Processor: Pentium M 1600 MHz Memory: 2GB Partitions: one (but did not survive install) Output of lspci and lspci -n: did not survive install Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot worked:[O] Configure network HW: [O] Config network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Create file systems:[E] Mount partitions: [ ] Install base system:[ ] Install boot loader:[ ] Reboot: [ ] Comments/Problems: Chose third option on filesystem partitioning and creating: LVM+encryption; chose to install everything in one partition (beginner's recommendation); everything fine this far. Was asked for encryption of swap file. Chose "yes" for encryption. Got asked for entering key. On that screen I changed my mind - did not want to use swap encryption. I chose "go back" (or what soever it is in the English version). Error: The screen with the choise "Swap encryption yes or no" (something alike) did not come up. Instead install continued (with now undefined values for encryption of swap?) and died at 82% when writing "uswp... something". Did not recover for 50 min. Terminated install. System did not look bootable. With best regards, Artus --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 01:03:47PM +0100, David Härdeman wrote: > Artus Krohn-Grimberghe wrote: >> Was asked for encryption of swap file. Chose "yes" for encryption. Got >> asked for entering key. On that screen I changed my mind - did not want to >> use swap encryption. I chose "go back" (or what soever it is in the >> English version). Error: The screen with the choise "Swap encryption yes >> or no" (something alike) did not come up. > > I'm not sure what to make of this. The auto-crypto install doesn't ask > whether you want an encrypted swap partition or not. Could you perhaps redo > the installation (in english) and provide the exact steps you took and the > messages you were presented with? I've tried reproducing this bug, but no luck. After a review of the relevant code I'm fairly certain that this should be caught by the existing checks for unencrypted swap. There is not much else we can do without more information, so I'm closing the bug. Max --- End Message ---
Bug#426943: marked as done (*_crypt naming causes df to line-wrap)
Your message dated Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:40:43 +0200 with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and subject line Bug#426943: *_crypt naming causes df to line-wrap has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact me immediately.) Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) --- Begin Message --- Package: partman-crypto Severity: wishlist The naming of crypto devices as hda1_crypt causes df to use two lines for each filesystem. Please consider using just cr_hda1 instead. -- System Information: Debian Release: lenny/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.20-1-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer, author, administrator, and user `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck - http://debiansystem.info `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems signature.asc Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP) --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Hi, On Fri, Jun 01, 2007 at 01:47:18PM +0200, David Härdeman wrote: > On Fri, June 1, 2007 00:25, martin f krafft wrote: > > The naming of crypto devices as hda1_crypt causes df to use two > > lines for each filesystem. Please consider using just cr_hda1 > > instead. > > I'm not sure what the point is...is it merely cosmetic? Because if it is, > cr_X is not that nice either. Also, the default crypto install uses LVM > which greatly increases the risk of other lines with line wraps anyway. > Finally, if we add persistent device names along the line of > /dev/disk/by-something/* that will also increase the risk. > > So unless someone explains to me in which way I've misunderstood this, I'm > inclined to close the bug report. I agree. The issue exists with LVM and other setups too, and is nothing we can fix by avoiding long names in partman-crypto only. If it boils down to a question of aesthetics, I must say that cr_hda1 feels less aesthetically pleasing to me since it is less "discoverable" and expressive, thus closing. Max --- End Message ---
Processed: merging root-on-loop-aes bugs
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > severity 434158 wishlist Bug#434158: partman-crypto: due to popular demand: root on loop-aes Severity set to `wishlist' from `wishlist' > merge 381895 434158 Bug#381895: Support installing onto loop-AES encrypted root partition Bug#434158: partman-crypto: due to popular demand: root on loop-aes Merged 381895 434158. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Processed: Re: Bug#381895: Support installing onto loop-AES encrypted root partition
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > # scripts are included as of loop-aes-utils 2.13~rc3-1 > unblock 381895 by 378488 Bug#378488: loop-aes-utils: integration with initramfs-tools for root fs on loop device Bug#381895: Support installing onto loop-AES encrypted root partition Was blocked by: 378488 Blocking bugs of 381895 removed: 378488 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. Debian bug tracking system administrator (administrator, Debian Bugs database) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Bug#436033: installation-guide: url to gpl on FSF site is wrong now
On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 08:18:35 +0200 Christian Perrier wrote: > Unless faw (Felipe Augusto van de Wiel, now in charge of the > installation guide) objects, I think it is OK for you to commit the > needed fix. > Ok, if noone objects during the next two weeks, I will commit attached patch. -- Kind regards Holger == Created with Sylpheed 2.3.0 under THE NEW DEBIAN GNU/LINUX 4.0 »Etch« http://counter.li.org/, Registered LinuxUser #311290 Try out OpenGL 3D-Desktop Beryl! www.beryl-project.org = --- urls.ent 2007-07-12 18:01:28.0 +0200 +++ urls.ent-workingcopy 2007-08-12 17:02:35.0 +0200 @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ http://www.varesearch.com/";> -http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.html";> +http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html";> http://www.linuxjournal.com/";>
Bug#410596: marked as done
Dear Sir/Madam, I have the same symptoms of this bug as described in http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2007/02/msg00924.html The iso images I tried were debian-40r0-i386-netinst.iso debian-edu-etch-i386-netinst-3.0r0.iso My laptop is a very old acer extensa 367T with 32MB memory. Is the iso image with the bug fix available somewhere? Regards, Markus Kaukonen -- ---www= http://www.iki.fi/markus.kaukonen--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ HOME-> Viinirinne 3 F 12 Dep. of Theoretical Chemistry \___ 02630 Espoo, Finland Lund University \ tel:+358-(0)9-5127122/h Chemical Centre, P. O. Box 124 \ S-221 00, Lund, Sweden \__ H+ __ --- Rikos ei kannata, eika maatalous Suomessa. (Paimio 1998) --- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Some ideas regarding hardware detection and the installation system
[Jérémy Bobbio] > Will that work for madwifi (Wi-Fi cards based on the Atheros > chipset)? If there are source packages with this driver in Debian, and someone get the required information into discover-data, yes. > On a closely related matter, could your infrastructure install > bcm43xx-fwcutter automatically when a wireless card based on the > coresponding Broadcom chipset is detected? Assuming you are talking about PCI or USB devices, yes. But someone need to get the required information into discover-data. > Is there an easy to restart this process later, for example after > moving an hard drive from a system to another? In that case, should > we add such entry in the rescue-mode? Yes. Just run discover-pkginstall as root. Happy hacking, -- Petter Reinholdtsen -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
