Bug#512507: HP Compaq dx2450 Testing-AMD64 inst.-report
Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version: debian-testing-amd64 2008-01-19 (http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian- testing-amd64-CD-1.iso) Date: 2008-01-21 11:13AM Machine: HP Compaq dx2450 Processor: AMD Athlon Dual Core Processor 5400B Memory: 2GB Partitions: Dateisystem Typ1K‐Blöcke Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf /dev/sda1 ext3 148268440 3072836 137663932 3% / tmpfstmpfs 965668 0965668 0% /lib/init/rw udev tmpfs 1024080 10160 1% /dev tmpfstmpfs 965668 0965668 0% /dev/shm Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): 00:00.0 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Memory Controller [10de:03ea] (rev a1) 00:01.0 ISA bridge [0601]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 LPC Bridge [10de:03e0] (rev a2) 00:01.1 SMBus [0c05]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 SMBus [10de:03eb] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: nForce2_smbus Kernel modules: i2c-nforce2 00:01.2 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Memory Controller [10de:03f5] (rev a2) 00:02.0 USB Controller [0c03]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 USB Controller [10de:03f1] (rev a3) Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd Kernel modules: ohci-hcd 00:02.1 USB Controller [0c03]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 USB Controller [10de:03f2] (rev a3) Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd Kernel modules: ehci-hcd 00:04.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI bridge [10de:03f3] (rev a1) 00:05.0 Audio device [0403]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio [10de:03f0] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel 00:07.0 Bridge [0680]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Ethernet [10de:03ef] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: forcedeth Kernel modules: forcedeth 00:08.0 IDE interface [0101]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 SATA Controller [10de:03f6] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: sata_nv Kernel modules: sata_nv, ata_generic, ide-pci-generic 00:08.1 IDE interface [0101]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 SATA Controller [10de:03f6] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: sata_nv Kernel modules: sata_nv, ata_generic, ide-pci-generic 00:09.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI Express bridge [10de:03e8] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver Kernel modules: shpchp 00:0b.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI Express bridge [10de:03e9] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver Kernel modules: shpchp 00:0c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI Express bridge [10de:03e9] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver Kernel modules: shpchp 00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 [10de:03d0] (rev a2) Kernel modules: nvidiafb 00:18.0 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/ Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration [1022:1100] 00:18.1 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/ Opteron] Address Map [1022:1101] 00:18.2 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/ Opteron] DRAM Controller [1022:1102] 00:18.3 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/ Opteron] Miscellaneous Control [1022:1103] Kernel driver in use: k8temp Kernel modules: k8temp Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: Everything went well :) pgprxjH4yefYz.pgp Description: PGP signature
Bug#512427: installation-reports: discover packages not installed - cause of double emals to BTS?
Package: installation-reports Followup-For: Bug #512427 -- System Information: Debian Release: 5.0 APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.6.26-1-686 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash Edit: generic D865PERLK P4 3GHz 512 L2, 1GB pc3200, onboard GB-lan, audio, Winfast Gforce-256 32MB ddr, Winfast 2000tv, Istor SATA RAID, 2 - Seagate 120GB SATA, NEC 16x DVD-RW, SONY 16x DVD-R I am testing to see if installing discover, discover-data and libdiscover2 fix the problem of reportbug sending two emails to BTS as well as not including the installer logs in the original message above. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: ext4 support
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 02:11:34AM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: On Saturday 10 January 2009, Colin Watson wrote: I realised I'd forgotten about the kernel udebs (we do those differently in Ubuntu so it slipped my mind). Should I just add ext4 to kernel-wedge/modules/ext3-modules, by analogy with the way I added ext4 support to partman-ext3? Although again it perhaps feels a little odd, it would involve the smallest source change, would avoid a pass through NEW for kernel udebs on all architectures when we get round to uploading all this, and generally seems as if it'd save hassle. It would have been nice to have a bit more time to comment on such a substantial patch, but well. I didn't think it was actually very complicated or non-obvious, despite the size, which is why I went ahead. I would strongly suggest to at least not actually _show_ ext4 as an option as long as not all blockers are fixed, i.e. not yet list it in valid_filesystems (IIRC). That will allow us to upload partman-ext3 if needed without having to worry about confusing users. OK; done. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: ext4 support
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 02:29:14PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org writes: If the ext4 support is a quite long term work, shouldn't it be listed in the wiki (http://wiki.debian.org/DebianInstaller/SqueezeGoals...which is currently a copy of the Lenny goals list, with done things removed) and maybe tracked either in the wiki or in the BTS with a meta-bug? Yes, it makes sense. I do like the idea of meta bug since it makes really easy to spot what is still missing. What people things about it? I'm more comfortable with the wiki for relatively small things like this; I added it to DebianInstaller/SqueezeGoals. Feel free to convert it to a bug with dependencies if you want, though. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: svn corruption: trunk/packages/po/sublevel4/da.po
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 09:09:13PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: It looks like the SVN repository itself is not corrupted, but unless someone has some very brilliant idea how to change history it does look as if we'll have to live with these extremely large files until the end of time. We could, in principle, do svnadmin dump | (human does some very careful editing) | svnadmin load. We'd have to be very careful, and I'd recommend not doing this until after Lenny is out. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: r57367 - trunk/packages/cdebconf-terminal/debian
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 02:51:41PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: On Tuesday 20 January 2009, Frans Pop wrote: --- trunk/packages/cdebconf-terminal/debian/control (original) +++ trunk/packages/cdebconf-terminal/debian/control Mon Jan 19 23:36:21 2009 @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ -Provides: cdebconf-entropy +Provides: cdebconf-terminal I wonder if that will cause problems for Lenny installs. It is quite likely that it has escaped testing efforts if it does... Looks like it is harmless. As you say; nothing currently depends on cdebconf-terminal as far as I know. (In future, we *should* depend on cdebconf-terminal and have libdebian-installer be smart enough to notice an XB-Debian-Frontend field and pick the right provider; all these 'anna-install cdebconf-$DEBIAN_FRONTEND-terminal' hacks are unpleasant.) -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#512535: HP Compaq dx2450 Testing, BOL (LAN/FAI)
Package: installation-reports Boot method: BOL (LAN/FAI) http://www.informatik.uni-koeln.de/fai/ Image version: Testing, i386 Date: 2008-01-21 13:20PM Machine: HP Compaq dx2450 Processor: AMD Athlon Dual Core Processor 5400B Memory: 2GB Partitions: Dateisystem Typ1K‐Blöcke Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf /dev/sda1 ext3 148268440 3072836 137663932 3% / tmpfstmpfs 965668 0965668 0% /lib/init/rw udev tmpfs 1024080 10160 1% /dev tmpfstmpfs 965668 0965668 0% /dev/shm Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): 00:00.0 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Memory Controller [10de:03ea] (rev a1) 00:01.0 ISA bridge [0601]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 LPC Bridge [10de:03e0] (rev a2) 00:01.1 SMBus [0c05]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 SMBus [10de:03eb] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: nForce2_smbus Kernel modules: i2c-nforce2 00:01.2 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Memory Controller [10de:03f5] (rev a2) 00:02.0 USB Controller [0c03]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 USB Controller [10de:03f1] (rev a3) Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd Kernel modules: ohci-hcd 00:02.1 USB Controller [0c03]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 USB Controller [10de:03f2] (rev a3) Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd Kernel modules: ehci-hcd 00:04.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI bridge [10de:03f3] (rev a1) 00:05.0 Audio device [0403]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio [10de:03f0] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel 00:07.0 Bridge [0680]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Ethernet [10de:03ef] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: forcedeth Kernel modules: forcedeth 00:08.0 IDE interface [0101]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 SATA Controller [10de:03f6] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: sata_nv Kernel modules: sata_nv, ata_generic, ide-pci-generic 00:08.1 IDE interface [0101]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 SATA Controller [10de:03f6] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: sata_nv Kernel modules: sata_nv, ata_generic, ide-pci-generic 00:09.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI Express bridge [10de:03e8] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver Kernel modules: shpchp 00:0b.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI Express bridge [10de:03e9] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver Kernel modules: shpchp 00:0c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI Express bridge [10de:03e9] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver Kernel modules: shpchp 00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 [10de:03d0] (rev a2) Kernel modules: nvidiafb 00:18.0 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/ Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration [1022:1100] 00:18.1 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/ Opteron] Address Map [1022:1101] 00:18.2 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/ Opteron] DRAM Controller [1022:1102] 00:18.3 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/ Opteron] Miscellaneous Control [1022:1103] Kernel driver in use: k8temp Kernel modules: k8temp Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: Everything went well :) pgpKMb5i9dKYN.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: On installation media and firmware [Re: New section for firmware]
Frans Pop elen...@planet.nl writes: On Wednesday 24 December 2008, Don Armstrong wrote: It would be nice if you (or someone else) would then explain[1] why having a limited set of d-i images + cd images which contained the non-free firmware necessary for certain hardware to boot would be an intractable solution. From where I sit, the major issues with it would be: The major issue is that it does not solve all use-cases where firmware is needed. It does not solve the problem for netboot installations, nor for hd-media installations. 1) So you are saying the NIC can netboot without firmware just fine but won't work under linux at all? 2) Also which hd-media installations need firmware to access udebs? 3) A d-i image which contained the non-free firmware would work just fine for netboot or hd-media. Also it does not have to solve all use-cases. It just has to solve more than without this solution. Further not all install media have to work all the time. So what if the netboot.iso won't work and you need a non-free-businesscard.iso due to firmware udebs? As long as it allows at least one method to work and allows more people to install Debian than without that is a plus. Also, D-I currently does not support switching CDs during early parts of the installation. Implementing that would be a fairly major pain. With a cd image which contains the firmware there is no need to switch the CD to a second just firmware image. We don't want to have users jump through hoops. Having to burn an additional image just for firmware and having to switch to that image and then switch back to the installation image is IMO a major hoop. The hoops are for the debian-cd team to jump through, for them to generate a 100% free and an actually usable image. Just like there was cd1 and cd1+non-us a while back there would be cd1 and cd1+firmware. It also does not really add anything to the option we already have to load firmware from removable media. It would remove the need for the user to jump through hoops to create and use a second removable media. Plus you said above CD switching isn't possible early on. Cheers, FJP MfG Goswin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Making commits by l10n-sync no longer silent?
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 08:49:05PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: On Tuesday 20 January 2009, Christian Perrier wrote: Are there any objections? IMO it is useless to send them to everybody. It would be nice to have them on IRC (they aren't right now, are they?). You're the main person who follows all commits by mail, as far as I know, so you're probably best-placed to comment on that. I also still feel that having daily syncs is way too much and leads to way too many commits which have the side effect of obscuring other changes. I can see some point in having daily sync runs after a call for translation updates when a release is being prepared, but at other times I feel that e.g. 3 times per week would be more than enough. I tend to agree, having been trying to look through 'svn log' for various things recently and finding it hard to see anything else for all the translation commits. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Making commits by l10n-sync no longer silent?
On Wednesday 21 January 2009, Colin Watson wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 08:49:05PM +0100, Frans Pop wrote: On Tuesday 20 January 2009, Christian Perrier wrote: Are there any objections? IMO it is useless to send them to everybody. It would be nice to have them on IRC (they aren't right now, are they?). They are on IRC. But this is about the content of the commits, which you obviously can only see in mails. You're the main person who follows all commits by mail, as far as I know, so you're probably best-placed to comment on that. Yeah, and I would not like to have to delete them. I could just filter them to /dev/null of course, but IMO it's better set things up on alioth so they get routed just to people who _do_ want them. (That could also be done by routing them to some other group address than private mail addresses of course, but I'm not sure if that is worth setting up.) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Processing of cdebconf_0.138lenny2_i386.changes
cdebconf_0.138lenny2_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: cdebconf_0.138lenny2.dsc cdebconf_0.138lenny2.tar.gz cdebconf-priority_0.138lenny2_all.udeb cdebconf_0.138lenny2_i386.deb libdebconfclient0_0.138lenny2_i386.deb libdebconfclient0-dev_0.138lenny2_i386.deb cdebconf-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb cdebconf-text-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
quik-installer 0.0.21lenny4 MIGRATED to testing
FYI: The status of the quik-installer source package in Debian's testing distribution has changed. Previous version: 0.0.21lenny3 Current version: 0.0.21lenny4 -- This email is automatically generated; the Debian Release Team debian-rele...@lists.debian.org is responsible. See http://release.debian.org/testing-watch/ for more information. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
cdebconf_0.138lenny2_i386.changes ACCEPTED
Accepted: cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb cdebconf-priority_0.138lenny2_all.udeb to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-priority_0.138lenny2_all.udeb cdebconf-text-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-text-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb cdebconf-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb cdebconf_0.138lenny2.dsc to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.138lenny2.dsc cdebconf_0.138lenny2.tar.gz to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.138lenny2.tar.gz cdebconf_0.138lenny2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf_0.138lenny2_i386.deb libdebconfclient0-dev_0.138lenny2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0-dev_0.138lenny2_i386.deb libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb to pool/main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb libdebconfclient0_0.138lenny2_i386.deb to pool/main/c/cdebconf/libdebconfclient0_0.138lenny2_i386.deb Override entries for your package: cdebconf-gtk-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb - optional debian-installer cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb - optional debian-installer cdebconf-priority_0.138lenny2_all.udeb - standard debian-installer cdebconf-text-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb - optional debian-installer cdebconf-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb - standard debian-installer cdebconf_0.138lenny2.dsc - source utils cdebconf_0.138lenny2_i386.deb - extra utils libdebconfclient0-dev_0.138lenny2_i386.deb - optional libdevel libdebconfclient0-udeb_0.138lenny2_i386.udeb - optional debian-installer libdebconfclient0_0.138lenny2_i386.deb - optional libs Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: svn corruption: trunk/packages/po/sublevel4/da.po
On Sunday 18 January 2009, Frans Pop wrote: On Sunday 18 January 2009, Philip Hands wrote: Having played with the -r option, I seem to have tracked down the revision it's stressed about: p...@cold:~/src/debian-svn/d-i$ git svn fetch -r57093:57094 Checksum mismatch: trunk/packages/po/sublevel4/da.po c9893a6364a37460e7a8ee1676d7ac0c9e85f59e expected: 2df48ca6c7a79d95b479c4f16eec44ba got: ec0b72182b31be69dcae734015d9e316 so it looks like the transition from 57093 to 57094 is where git chokes. The cause of the git-svn failure is almost certainly the file size of da.po. It also looks as if this is only a problem on 32-bits systems as my own git-svn checkout (on an amd64 system) could handle the file without error. Turns out the actual problem was merely a too small TEMP directory. Seems like a bug that git-svn does not catch the out of space error correctly though. [18:26:00] fil fjp: just put a 2GB /tmp on the machine, and can now clone the sublevel4 directory, which wasn't working before -- the problem does seem to have trashed my main clone though :-( [18:27:20] fil so looks like that's all it was -- while fixing it, tried 1GB, which didn't work, but actually threw an out-of-space error, which would have been much more helpful signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Bug#512535: marked as done (HP Compaq dx2450 Testing, BOL (LAN/FAI))
Your message dated Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:18:53 +0100 with message-id 20090121171853.gb7...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org and subject line Re: Bug#512535: HP Compaq dx2450 Testing, BOL (LAN/FAI) has caused the Debian Bug report #512535, regarding HP Compaq dx2450 Testing, BOL (LAN/FAI) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 512535: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512535 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: installation-reports Boot method: BOL (LAN/FAI) http://www.informatik.uni-koeln.de/fai/ Image version: Testing, i386 Date: 2008-01-21 13:20PM Machine: HP Compaq dx2450 Processor: AMD Athlon Dual Core Processor 5400B Memory: 2GB Partitions: Dateisystem Typ1K‐Blöcke Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf /dev/sda1 ext3 148268440 3072836 137663932 3% / tmpfstmpfs 965668 0965668 0% /lib/init/rw udev tmpfs 1024080 10160 1% /dev tmpfstmpfs 965668 0965668 0% /dev/shm Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): 00:00.0 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Memory Controller [10de:03ea] (rev a1) 00:01.0 ISA bridge [0601]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 LPC Bridge [10de:03e0] (rev a2) 00:01.1 SMBus [0c05]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 SMBus [10de:03eb] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: nForce2_smbus Kernel modules: i2c-nforce2 00:01.2 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Memory Controller [10de:03f5] (rev a2) 00:02.0 USB Controller [0c03]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 USB Controller [10de:03f1] (rev a3) Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd Kernel modules: ohci-hcd 00:02.1 USB Controller [0c03]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 USB Controller [10de:03f2] (rev a3) Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd Kernel modules: ehci-hcd 00:04.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI bridge [10de:03f3] (rev a1) 00:05.0 Audio device [0403]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio [10de:03f0] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel 00:07.0 Bridge [0680]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Ethernet [10de:03ef] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: forcedeth Kernel modules: forcedeth 00:08.0 IDE interface [0101]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 SATA Controller [10de:03f6] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: sata_nv Kernel modules: sata_nv, ata_generic, ide-pci-generic 00:08.1 IDE interface [0101]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 SATA Controller [10de:03f6] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: sata_nv Kernel modules: sata_nv, ata_generic, ide-pci-generic 00:09.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI Express bridge [10de:03e8] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver Kernel modules: shpchp 00:0b.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI Express bridge [10de:03e9] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver Kernel modules: shpchp 00:0c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI Express bridge [10de:03e9] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver Kernel modules: shpchp 00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 [10de:03d0] (rev a2) Kernel modules: nvidiafb 00:18.0 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/ Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration [1022:1100] 00:18.1 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/ Opteron] Address Map [1022:1101] 00:18.2 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/ Opteron] DRAM Controller [1022:1102] 00:18.3 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/ Opteron] Miscellaneous Control [1022:1103] Kernel driver in use: k8temp Kernel modules: k8temp Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: Everything went well :) pgpCZtisUr00O.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Everything went well :) Given that your installation was a complete success, I do as usual with reports for successful installations: I close the bug..:-) This does not of course
Bug#512507: marked as done (HP Compaq dx2450 Testing-AMD64 inst.-report)
Your message dated Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:17:28 +0100 with message-id 20090121171728.ga7...@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org and subject line Re: Bug#512507: HP Compaq dx2450 Testing-AMD64 inst.-report has caused the Debian Bug report #512507, regarding HP Compaq dx2450 Testing-AMD64 inst.-report to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 512507: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=512507 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ---BeginMessage--- Package: installation-reports Boot method: CD Image version: debian-testing-amd64 2008-01-19 (http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/weekly-builds/amd64/iso-cd/debian- testing-amd64-CD-1.iso) Date: 2008-01-21 11:13AM Machine: HP Compaq dx2450 Processor: AMD Athlon Dual Core Processor 5400B Memory: 2GB Partitions: Dateisystem Typ1K‐Blöcke Benutzt Verfügbar Ben% Eingehängt auf /dev/sda1 ext3 148268440 3072836 137663932 3% / tmpfstmpfs 965668 0965668 0% /lib/init/rw udev tmpfs 1024080 10160 1% /dev tmpfstmpfs 965668 0965668 0% /dev/shm Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): 00:00.0 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Memory Controller [10de:03ea] (rev a1) 00:01.0 ISA bridge [0601]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 LPC Bridge [10de:03e0] (rev a2) 00:01.1 SMBus [0c05]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 SMBus [10de:03eb] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: nForce2_smbus Kernel modules: i2c-nforce2 00:01.2 RAM memory [0500]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Memory Controller [10de:03f5] (rev a2) 00:02.0 USB Controller [0c03]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 USB Controller [10de:03f1] (rev a3) Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd Kernel modules: ohci-hcd 00:02.1 USB Controller [0c03]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 USB Controller [10de:03f2] (rev a3) Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd Kernel modules: ehci-hcd 00:04.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI bridge [10de:03f3] (rev a1) 00:05.0 Audio device [0403]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 High Definition Audio [10de:03f0] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: HDA Intel Kernel modules: snd-hda-intel 00:07.0 Bridge [0680]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 Ethernet [10de:03ef] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: forcedeth Kernel modules: forcedeth 00:08.0 IDE interface [0101]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 SATA Controller [10de:03f6] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: sata_nv Kernel modules: sata_nv, ata_generic, ide-pci-generic 00:08.1 IDE interface [0101]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 SATA Controller [10de:03f6] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: sata_nv Kernel modules: sata_nv, ata_generic, ide-pci-generic 00:09.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI Express bridge [10de:03e8] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver Kernel modules: shpchp 00:0b.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI Express bridge [10de:03e9] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver Kernel modules: shpchp 00:0c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: nVidia Corporation MCP61 PCI Express bridge [10de:03e9] (rev a2) Kernel driver in use: pcieport-driver Kernel modules: shpchp 00:0d.0 VGA compatible controller [0300]: nVidia Corporation GeForce 6150SE nForce 430 [10de:03d0] (rev a2) Kernel modules: nvidiafb 00:18.0 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/ Opteron] HyperTransport Technology Configuration [1022:1100] 00:18.1 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/ Opteron] Address Map [1022:1101] 00:18.2 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/ Opteron] DRAM Controller [1022:1102] 00:18.3 Host bridge [0600]: Advanced Micro Devices [AMD] K8 [Athlon64/ Opteron] Miscellaneous Control [1022:1103] Kernel driver in use: k8temp Kernel modules: k8temp Base System Installation Checklist: [O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it Initial boot: [O] Detect network card:[O] Configure network: [O] Detect CD: [O] Load installer modules: [O] Detect hard drives: [O] Partition hard drives: [O] Install base system:[O] Clock/timezone setup: [O] User/password setup:[O] Install tasks: [O] Install boot loader:[O] Overall install:[O] Comments/Problems: Everything went well :) pgpTb5BNXa7dL.pgp Description: PGP signature ---End Message--- ---BeginMessage--- Everything went well :) Given that your installation was a complete success, I do as usual with reports for
Bug#512457: console-setup: [INTL:pt_BR] Brazilian Portuguese debconf templates translation
Quoting Flamarion Jorge (flamarili...@yahoo.com.br): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: console-setup Tags: l10n patch Severity: wishlist Please, Could you update the Brazilian Portuguese Translation? When synced with what we have currently in SVN, 13 fuzzy strings appear. Could you please complete the file and send it back to this bug report? pt_BR.po Description: application/gettext signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#512457: console-setup: [INTL:pt_BR] Brazilian Portuguese debconf templates translation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 When synced with what we have currently in SVN, 13 fuzzy strings appear. Could you please complete the file and send it back to this bug report? I do not understand, because the result of msgfmt was this: $msgfmt -cvo /dev/null pt_BR.po 75 mensagens traduzidas.(75 translated messages) And to ensure that the correct file I sent, i do diff and the result was this: $ diff -u pt_BR.po pt_BR_bts.po pt_BR.diff $ cat pt_BR.diff The diff did not produce any results. gtranslator also does not show any messages fuzzy Att. - -- Flamarion Jorge -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkl3rOAACgkQ0SDRnmynUOHEuwCg2jhZiqUzfkeJYjcO7/1zGi7P yzEAoIe7coSDa1yf0OkAhjrAUCVH3+Bn =u+uI -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#512457: console-setup: [INTL:pt_BR] Brazilian Portuguese debconf templates translation
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 21-01-2009 17:19, Christian Perrier wrote: Quoting Flamarion Jorge (flamarili...@yahoo.com.br): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Package: console-setup Tags: l10n patch Severity: wishlist Please, Could you update the Brazilian Portuguese Translation? When synced with what we have currently in SVN, 13 fuzzy strings appear. Could you please complete the file and send it back to this bug report? Christian, I noticed that this is kept in D-I SVN, is this not listed in packages/po/sublevel* ? Since I'm keeping the SVN up-to-date based on packages/po/ I'm probably missing packages that are not auto-synced, is there a list of such packages? If I knew that console-setup is not being listed as a sublevel, I would probably have committed (or already translated it). Probably, there are other PO files missing pt_BR translation there that I was not aware of. :-( Kind regards, - -- Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) Debian. Freedom to code. Code to freedom! -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkl31EUACgkQCjAO0JDlykbAgQCgvSW0vPEl1OL9RCjOiuYof7qj BWIAmgM015Kr5eIN0SeGBZIpNKD5iaHs =W5Nq -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Re: Debian-installer early kernel exception (ASUS P5QL motherboard, i386)
Can you confirm that a daily built image [1] does not have the problem? Yes, I can confirm that the daily built image (22-Jan-2009 04:13, netinst) is working perfectly fine. (For search engines: the error at boot was: BUG Int 14: CR2 ffb41000) Márton Drótos -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Bug#512457: console-setup: [INTL:pt_BR] Brazilian Portuguese debconf templates translation
Quoting Flamarion Jorge (flamarili...@yahoo.com.br): -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 When synced with what we have currently in SVN, 13 fuzzy strings appear. Could you please complete the file and send it back to this bug report? I do not understand, because the result of msgfmt was this: $msgfmt -cvo /dev/null pt_BR.po 75 mensagens traduzidas.(75 translated messages) Well, the msgid's in your file where different from those in the POT file as of now. In short, you apparently worked on an old version..:-) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#512457: console-setup: [INTL:pt_BR] Brazilian Portuguese debconf templates translation
Quoting Felipe Augusto van de Wiel (faw) (f...@funlabs.org): I noticed that this is kept in D-I SVN, is this not listed in packages/po/sublevel* ? Since I'm keeping the Because console-setup is not used by d-i as of now (actually, it's used in Ubuntu, but translations aren't). So, it wouldn't be fair to those who want to first work on d-i to add these 75 strings to their workload. If I knew that console-setup is not being listed as a sublevel, I would probably have committed (or already translated it). Probably, there are other PO files missing pt_BR translation there that I was not aware of. :-( No, there is no other such package. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
