Bug#591852: libdebian-installer: FTBFS: Clock skew detected.

2010-08-06 Thread Petter Reinholdtsen
[Cyril Brulebois]
 your package FTBFS on many buildds:
 | dpkg-buildpackage: host architecture ia64
 |  /usr/bin/fakeroot debian/rules clean
 | make: Warning: File `debian/rules' has modification time 2.4e+02 s in the 
 future

Is the clock on the autobuilder completely off?  Either that, or
prehaps the uploaders machine had wrong clock?

Happy hacking,
-- 
Petter Reinholdtsen



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/2fleieci8i2@login1.uio.no



Towards common sense to

2010-08-06 Thread Austin Richardson
Towards common sense

The commotion surrounding vaccinations used for waging political battles 
will eventually turn against communities.

The 1918-1919 flu pandemic, nicknamed “the Spanish flu”, was also caused by 
the A/H1N1 swine flu virus. Its first wave had a similar course to the 
current incidence of disease. In spring 1918, the first wave of the 
pandemic hit. Although highly contagious, it did not bring with it a 
significant death rate. The second outbreak, which commenced in September 
1918, was marked by an incredibly high number of fatalities, whilst the 
third took place in 1919.

The course of the current A/H1N1 pandemic without a great number of 
fatalities (if one can describe the death of 20,000 people in such a way) 
is not conducive to a rational assessment of the preventive vaccination 
programme. For many politicians, populism and the desire to win over voters 
are the only determinants of their actions. Such politicians prey on the 
low awareness on the part of society, which notices only events, and 
imagining what could potentially happen is outside their visible realm. 
Also, a lack of knowledge about the course of the “Spanish flu” pandemic of 
1918-1919 and its death toll, estimated at between 50 million and 100 
million people, is not conducive to preventive vaccinations.

If an anti-vaccination attitude is reinforced in social beliefs, then the 
future may see the deaths of millions of people as a result of abandoning 
general preventive vaccinations. The message to inform people of the risk 
carried by an influenza pandemic is an important one. Let us hope that the 
situation will be different from the regularity, which often accompanies 
capital markets, where world crunches occur within cycles every few decades 
or so, and awareness of the threat dies with the generation.

We find ourselves in a place and time where the future of mankind’s 
existence in the conflict with mortal viruses is clinched. Let us stop the 
feverish bus ride, fed with political populism and short-sighted electoral 
perspective. Let us look at the warning signs, which mankind encountered in 
his path in the years 1918-1919.

If you believe that it is worthwhile doing something for the common good, 
then forward this appeal to others or link to: www.right-to-health.org so 
that the information has a chance to spread. We are the ones who can 
influence whether common sense prevails.

Sense is sometimes in the minority and loses out to populism, but let us 
not give up just yet!



cloning 569359, reassign -1 to partman-md

2010-08-06 Thread Colin Watson
# Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
clone 569359 -1
reassign -1 partman-md 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1281101544-2726-bts-cjwat...@debian.org



Processed: cloning 569359, reassign -1 to partman-md

2010-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

 # Automatically generated email from bts, devscripts version 2.10.35lenny7
 clone 569359 -1
Bug#569359: /sbin/mdadm --detail --scan fails in d-i
Bug 569359 cloned as bug 591917.

 reassign -1 partman-md
Bug #591917 [mdadm] /sbin/mdadm --detail --scan fails in d-i
Bug reassigned from package 'mdadm' to 'partman-md'.
Bug No longer marked as found in versions mdadm/3.1.1-1.

End of message, stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
591917: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=591917
569359: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=569359
-1: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=-1
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.128110155130075.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



please hint udev

2010-08-06 Thread Marco d'Itri
It will also fix the symptoms of #586404.

-- 
ciao,
Marco


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100806140418.gb20...@bongo.bofh.it



ppp-udeb depending on ppp-modules

2010-08-06 Thread Marco d'Itri
ppp-udeb/armel unsatisfiable Depends: ppp-modules
ppp-udeb/s390 unsatisfiable Depends: ppp-modules 

http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=ppp

Please advise. ppp-udeb has been this way for a long time, does it need
to be changed due to kernel changes?

-- 
ciao,
Marco


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#591923: boot.img and debian-installer usb stick problem

2010-08-06 Thread Sietze van de Burgt

Package: debian-installer

Version: 20090123lenny7

also seems to afflict version 20090123

Hi there,

I have made a bootable usb stick for installation of debian on an acer
aspire one.
The stick boots fine but the problem arises when it searches for a
bootable ISO image.
I have to do this twice in order to find the image (not the actual
problem but still worth mentioning).
At first it responds with:

An installation step failed. You can try to run the failing item again
from the menu,
or skip it and choose something else. The failing step is:
Scan hard drive for an installer ISO image.

The second time it mentions mounting sda1 sda2 sda5 (hard disk) sdb1
(USB stick)
and the installer quickly finds the ISO image on the stick.
It does not seem to scan the harddrive at all (or probably only looks at
the root directory of the disk)
no hd. light going on and off.
It says:

The Iso file: /debian-505-i386-netinst.iso on /dev/sdb1/ (STABLE) will
be used as the
installation iso image.

Then the installation continues as usual but when the partitioning
system wants to write
to the disk (I choose guided partitioning use whole disk everything in
one directory /
but this choice doesn't matter - whatever you choose here leads towards
the same problem).
It fails with the following message:

The EXT3 file system creation in partition #1 of SCSI1 (0,0,0) (SDA) failed.

What caught my eye was when I opened a terminal and entered a mount
command without options.
Is that both /dev/sda1 (hard disk) and /dev/sdb1 (USB stick) are mounted
on the directory /hd-media.
this must have led to a problem when partitioning the hard disk because
partitioning a mounted volume
leads to trouble.
I tried unmounting the /cdrom directory wich contains the ISO image
mounted over the loop device,
which in turn is located on usb stick /dev/sdb1 then unmounting
/dev/sdb1 and then unmouting the harddisk /dev/sda1
what should remedy the problem.
And then reattaching the usb stick /dev/sdb1 and mounting the ISO on it
through the loopback back on /cdrom
so I could continue the installation.
However, this doesn't work because (speculation) the installer itself
seems to be using the /hd-media directory
wich results in a DEVICE BUSY when trying to unmount the /dev/sda1 or
/dev/sdb1 who are mounted there.
When playing around it seems that the scan hard drive for an ISO image
option
mounts everything - it expects the ISO image to be on and forgets to
unmount the devices where it does not find it.
Leading towards my problem.
After this option in the installer menu the whole lot gets tangled up
and I am not savvy enough to untangle it again.
I do not know if this is an acer aspire one problem or a more general
issue by lack of another laptop.
Anyway the installation from stick is rendered useless this way. Hope
this helps in fixing things.

Kind regards,

Sietze van de Burgt





--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4c5c1cca.8090...@gmail.com



Bug#591852: libdebian-installer: FTBFS: Clock skew detected.

2010-08-06 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Petter Reinholdtsen p...@hungry.com (06/08/2010):
 Is the clock on the autobuilder completely off?  Either that, or
 prehaps the uploaders machine had wrong clock?

Out of the blue, I would say something wrong on uploader's machine/in
the uploaded package.

Mraw,
KiBi.


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processing of netcfg_1.55_amd64.changes

2010-08-06 Thread Archive Administrator
netcfg_1.55_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
  netcfg_1.55.dsc
  netcfg_1.55.tar.gz
  netcfg_1.55_amd64.udeb
  netcfg-static_1.55_amd64.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host kassia.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ohpkv-0003ts...@kassia.debian.org



Processing of netcfg_1.55_amd64.changes

2010-08-06 Thread Archive Administrator
netcfg_1.55_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  netcfg_1.55.dsc
  netcfg_1.55.tar.gz
  netcfg_1.55_amd64.udeb
  netcfg-static_1.55_amd64.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ohplq-0002ti...@franck.debian.org



netcfg_1.55_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-08-06 Thread Archive Administrator



Accepted:
netcfg-static_1.55_amd64.udeb
  to main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_1.55_amd64.udeb
netcfg_1.55.dsc
  to main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.55.dsc
netcfg_1.55.tar.gz
  to main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.55.tar.gz
netcfg_1.55_amd64.udeb
  to main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.55_amd64.udeb


Override entries for your package:
netcfg-static_1.55_amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer
netcfg_1.55.dsc - source debian-installer
netcfg_1.55_amd64.udeb - optional debian-installer

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org
Closing bugs: 588761 


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ohpdm-00040g...@franck.debian.org



Bug#588761: marked as done (netcfg: please include Hurd support)

2010-08-06 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Fri, 06 Aug 2010 16:19:00 +
with message-id e1ohpdm-00040m...@franck.debian.org
and subject line Bug#588761: fixed in netcfg 1.55
has caused the Debian Bug report #588761,
regarding netcfg: please include Hurd support
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
588761: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=588761
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
---BeginMessage---
Package: netcfg
Version: 1.54
Tags: patch
Usertags: gsoc2010

NB: Please don't care -- I'll ask Samuel Thibault (my GSoC mentor) to
commit most of my changes, including those, and ask debian-boot to
review the more intrusive ones later, in one run. Of course I welcome
any kind of comments nonetheless.

Anyway, the attached patch makes netcfg-static work on Hurd.

Thanks,
-- 
Jeremie Koenig j...@jk.fr.eu.org
http://jk.fr.eu.org
Index: netcfg/debian/changelog
===
--- netcfg/debian/changelog	(revision 63843)
+++ netcfg/debian/changelog	(working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+netcfg (1.55) UNRELEASED; urgency=low
+
+  * More fixes for Hurd support, including network device detection
+(closes: please fill-in).
+
+ -- Jeremie Koenig j...@jk.fr.eu.org  Sun, 11 Jul 2010 22:51:56 +
+
 netcfg (1.54) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Samuel Thibault ]
Index: netcfg/static.c
===
--- netcfg/static.c	(revision 63843)
+++ netcfg/static.c	(working copy)
@@ -274,20 +274,22 @@
 char ptr1[INET_ADDRSTRLEN];
 
 #ifdef __GNU__
-di_exec_shell_log(settrans /servers/socket/2 -fg);
 snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),
  settrans -fgap /servers/socket/2 /hurd/pfinet --interface=%s --address=%s,
  interface, inet_ntop (AF_INET, ipaddress, ptr1, sizeof (ptr1)));
 di_snprintfcat(buf, sizeof(buf),  --netmask=%s,
inet_ntop (AF_INET, netmask, ptr1, sizeof (ptr1)));
-buf[sizeof(buf) - 1] = '\0';
 
 if (gateway.s_addr)
-snprintf(buf, sizeof(buf),  --gateway=%s,
- inet_ntop (AF_INET, gateway, ptr1, sizeof (ptr1)));
+di_snprintfcat(buf, sizeof(buf),  --gateway=%s,
+   inet_ntop (AF_INET, gateway, ptr1, sizeof (ptr1)));
 
-rv |= di_exec_shell_log(buf);
+buf[sizeof(buf) - 1] = '\0';
 
+/* NB: unfortunately we cannot use di_exec_shell_log() here, as the active
+ * translator would capture its pipe and make it hang forever. */
+rv |= di_exec_shell(buf);
+
 #elif defined(__FreeBSD_kernel__)
 deconfigure_network();
 
Index: netcfg/netcfg-common.c
===
--- netcfg/netcfg-common.c	(revision 63843)
+++ netcfg/netcfg-common.c	(working copy)
@@ -229,8 +229,52 @@
 return strcmp(*ia, *ib);
 }
 
+#ifdef __GNU__
+#include mach.h
+#include device/device.h
+#include hurd.h
+/* Unfortunately, getifaddrs() does not work on Hurd, so we try possible names
+ * for network interfaces and check whether they exists by attempting to open
+ * the kernel device. */
 int get_all_ifs (int all, char*** ptr)
 {
+static const char *const fmt[] = { eth%d, wl%d, NULL };
+
+mach_port_t device_master;
+device_t device;
+int err;
+char **list;
+int num, i, j;
+char name[5 + 3 * sizeof (int)];
+
+err = get_privileged_ports (0, device_master);
+if (err)
+	return 0;
+
+num = 0;
+list = malloc(sizeof *list);
+for (i = 0; fmt[i]; i++)
+	for (j = 0; 1; j++) {
+	sprintf (name, fmt[i], j);
+	err = device_open (device_master, D_READ, name, device);
+	if (err != 0)
+		break;
+
+	device_close (device);
+	mach_port_deallocate (mach_task_self (), device);
+
+	list = realloc (list, (num + 2) * sizeof *list);
+	list[num++] = strdup(name);
+	}
+list[num] = NULL;
+
+mach_port_deallocate (mach_task_self (), device_master);
+*ptr = list;
+return num;
+}
+#else
+int get_all_ifs (int all, char*** ptr)
+{
 struct ifaddrs *ifap, *ifa;
 char ibuf[512];
 char** list = NULL;
@@ -279,6 +323,7 @@
 
 return len;
 }
+#endif
 
 #ifdef __linux__
 short find_in_stab(const char* iface)
---End Message---
---BeginMessage---
Source: netcfg
Source-Version: 1.55

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
netcfg, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

netcfg-static_1.55_amd64.udeb
  to main/n/netcfg/netcfg-static_1.55_amd64.udeb
netcfg_1.55.dsc
  to main/n/netcfg/netcfg_1.55.dsc
netcfg_1.55.tar.gz
  to 

Bug#591978: tasksel: lxde-desktop install includes gnome (non-d-i invocation)

2010-08-06 Thread Ben Armstrong
Package: tasksel
Version: 2.81
Severity: normal

Calling tasksel from the command-line (as live-helper does in chroot_tasks)
instead of via d-i, if you try to install lxde-desktop, it will include gnome.
While not a serious problem for most users, it is very serious for debian-live,
since lxde is supposed to be our lightest desktop and ends up being actually
larger than gnome itself.

The good news is that it can be worked around (thanks, Joey Hess for the tip)
by preseeding debconf.  But this is not at all obvious to the developer trying
to install tasks, so has the appearance of being broken.

This is what worked for me:

echo tasksel tasksel/desktop select lxde | debconf-set-selections

And then the install proceeds normally without pulling in GNOME.

Please fix tasksel so we don't have to hack around it to make installing
the lxde-desktop task do the expected thing. The intuitively obvious thing
for 'install lxde-desktop' is that only lxde-desktop should be installed and
not gnome.

Thanks,
Ben

-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages tasksel depends on:
ii  aptitude  0.6.3-3terminal-based package manager (te
ii  debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.5.33 Debian configuration management sy
ii  liblocale-gettext-perl1.05-6 Using libc functions for internati
ii  tasksel-data  2.81   Official tasks used for installati

tasksel recommends no packages.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100806190127.30174.5431.report...@lear.nslug.ns.ca



Bug#592003: reportbug installation-reports

2010-08-06 Thread Michael Schlegel

Package: installation-reports

Boot method:How did you boot the installer? CD? floppy? network?
Image 
version:http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/daily-builds/daily/arch-latest/i386/iso-cd/
Date:08-02-2010, 08-03-2010, 08-05-2010 and 08-06-2010

Machine:Notebook MSI 7005, Desktop PC)
Processor:Dualcore
Memory:4GB
Partitions:df -Tl will do; the raw partition table is preferred

Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn):

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [0]
Detect network card:[0]
Configure network:  [0]
Detect CD:  [0]
Load installer modules: [0]
Detect hard drives: [0]
Partition hard drives:  [0]
Install base system:[0]
Clock/timezone setup:   [0]
User/password setup:[0]
Install tasks:  [0]
Install boot loader:[E]
Overall install:[ ]

Comments/Problems: Install Bootloader to MBR always failt. Can't write 
bootloader to sda grub-lagacy also grub2 must take lilo

Description of the install, in prose, and any thoughts, comments
  and ideas you had during the initial install.

What can i do?

--

Michael Schlegel
Fontanestr. 9
64354 Reinheim
Tel.: 06162-4409
mschle...@miflo.de mailto:mschle...@miflo.de
www.miflo.de http://www.miflo.de/



Umsonst Telefonieren+DSL16000 
http://www.profiseller.de/shop1/mega/index.php3?ps_id=P8273710shop=10


Lastminute Reiseportal 
http://www.profiseller.de/shop1/mega/index.php3?ps_id=P8273710shop=11


Conrad Sonderposten 
http://www.profiseller.de/shop1/mega/index.php3?ps_id=P8273710shop=14





Bug#592005: Debian installer fails because the initial ramdisk does not include unusual USB storage drivers

2010-08-06 Thread Gordon Farquharson
Package: kernel-wedge
Version: 2.64
Severity: serious

The daily squeeze installer builds aren't working on my NSLU2 (armel).
I think that the problem is related to bug 534324 [1]. The USB disk
enclosure I am using uses a Cypress chipset, and the installer image
doesn't include ums-cypress.ko, which seems to be required with 2.6.32
for this chipset. Therefore, the installer does not find any disks
onto which the operating system can be installed.

Gordon

-- 
Gordon Farquharson
GnuPG Key ID: 32D6D676



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/aanlktimkb84yzevcj13obawpf49mz6=1klrmefckk...@mail.gmail.com



Freeze exception for busybox 1.17.1-2

2010-08-06 Thread Aurelien Jarno
Hi,

I have just uploaded busybox version 1:1.17.1-2 into unstable (it was
previously in experimental), which supports Hurd and GNU/kFreeBSD.

As already agreed with Otavio, could you please unblock this package?

Thanks,
Aurelien

-- 
Aurelien Jarno  GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73
aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100806210653.ga3...@volta.aurel32.net



Processing of busybox_1.17.1-2_amd64.changes

2010-08-06 Thread Archive Administrator
busybox_1.17.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org
along with the files:
  busybox_1.17.1-2.dsc
  busybox_1.17.1-2.debian.tar.gz
  busybox-syslogd_1.17.1-2_all.deb
  udhcpc_1.17.1-2_all.deb
  udhcpd_1.17.1-2_all.deb
  busybox_1.17.1-2_amd64.deb
  busybox-static_1.17.1-2_amd64.deb
  busybox-udeb_1.17.1-2_amd64.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host kassia.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ohubf-yo...@kassia.debian.org



Processing of busybox_1.17.1-2_amd64.changes

2010-08-06 Thread Archive Administrator
busybox_1.17.1-2_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost
along with the files:
  busybox_1.17.1-2.dsc
  busybox_1.17.1-2.debian.tar.gz
  busybox-syslogd_1.17.1-2_all.deb
  udhcpc_1.17.1-2_all.deb
  udhcpd_1.17.1-2_all.deb
  busybox_1.17.1-2_amd64.deb
  busybox-static_1.17.1-2_amd64.deb
  busybox-udeb_1.17.1-2_amd64.udeb

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ohucy-0005pp...@franck.debian.org



busybox_1.17.1-2_amd64.changes ACCEPTED

2010-08-06 Thread Archive Administrator



Accepted:
busybox-static_1.17.1-2_amd64.deb
  to main/b/busybox/busybox-static_1.17.1-2_amd64.deb
busybox-syslogd_1.17.1-2_all.deb
  to main/b/busybox/busybox-syslogd_1.17.1-2_all.deb
busybox-udeb_1.17.1-2_amd64.udeb
  to main/b/busybox/busybox-udeb_1.17.1-2_amd64.udeb
busybox_1.17.1-2.debian.tar.gz
  to main/b/busybox/busybox_1.17.1-2.debian.tar.gz
busybox_1.17.1-2.dsc
  to main/b/busybox/busybox_1.17.1-2.dsc
busybox_1.17.1-2_amd64.deb
  to main/b/busybox/busybox_1.17.1-2_amd64.deb
udhcpc_1.17.1-2_all.deb
  to main/b/busybox/udhcpc_1.17.1-2_all.deb
udhcpd_1.17.1-2_all.deb
  to main/b/busybox/udhcpd_1.17.1-2_all.deb


Override entries for your package:
busybox-static_1.17.1-2_amd64.deb - extra shells
busybox-syslogd_1.17.1-2_all.deb - optional utils
busybox-udeb_1.17.1-2_amd64.udeb - extra debian-installer
busybox_1.17.1-2.dsc - source utils
busybox_1.17.1-2_amd64.deb - optional utils
udhcpc_1.17.1-2_all.deb - optional net
udhcpd_1.17.1-2_all.deb - optional net

Announcing to debian-devel-chan...@lists.debian.org


Thank you for your contribution to Debian.


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ohui6-0006ca...@franck.debian.org



busybox override disparity

2010-08-06 Thread Archive Administrator
There are disparities between your recently accepted upload and the
override file for the following file(s):

udhcpc_1.17.1-2_all.deb: package says section is utils, override says net.
udhcpd_1.17.1-2_all.deb: package says section is utils, override says net.


Please note that a list of new sections were recently added to the
archive: cli-mono, database, debug, fonts, gnu-r, gnustep, haskell,
httpd, java, kernel, lisp, localization, ocaml, php, ruby, vcs, video,
xfce, zope.  At this time a script was used to reclassify packages into
these sections.  If this is the case, please only reply to this email if
the new section is inappropriate, otherwise please update your package
at the next upload.

Either the package or the override file is incorrect.  If you think
the override is correct and the package wrong please fix the package
so that this disparity is fixed in the next upload.  If you feel the
override is incorrect then please file a bug against ftp.debian.org and
explain why. Please INCLUDE the list of packages as seen above, or we
won't be able to deal with your request due to missing information.

Please make sure that the subject of the bug you file follows the
following format:

Subject: override: BINARY1:section/priority, [...], BINARYX:section/priority

Include the justification for the change in the body of the mail please.


[NB: this is an automatically generated mail; if you already filed a bug
and have not received a response yet, please ignore this mail.  Your bug
needs to be processed by a human and will be in due course, but until
then the installer will send these automated mails; sorry.]

--
Debian distribution maintenance software

(This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there
is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by
mailing ftpmas...@debian.org)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ohuid-0006cs...@franck.debian.org



Bug#592005: Debian installer fails because the initial ramdisk does not include unusual USB storage drivers

2010-08-06 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Gordon Farquharson gordonfarquhar...@gmail.com [2010-08-06 13:17]:
 The daily squeeze installer builds aren't working on my NSLU2 (armel).
 I think that the problem is related to bug 534324 [1]. The USB disk
 enclosure I am using uses a Cypress chipset, and the installer image
 doesn't include ums-cypress.ko, which seems to be required with 2.6.32
 for this chipset. Therefore, the installer does not find any disks
 onto which the operating system can be installed.

Yep, we need to add the ums-* modules.  I've done that in SVN.
-- 
Martin Michlmayr
http://www.cyrius.com/



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100807021922.gc14...@jirafa.cyrius.com



Bug#592048: cdebconf: unable to display ${something}

2010-08-06 Thread Thibaut GIRKA
Package: cdebconf
Version: unable to display ${something}
Severity: minor
Tags: d-i

I'm writing a tool to modify the u-boot environment on certain devices.
At a point, I'm showing the user the changes to make to his environment.
Such changes usually contains the ${mtdparts} string, that triggers an
assertion error in cdebconf when displayed.

I have made several tests:
1°) db_subst uboot-installer/apply_changes CHANGES $$ shows $$,
2°) db_subst uboot-installer/apply_changes CHANGES \${mtdparts} aborts
3°) db_subst uboot-installer/apply_changes CHANGES $\{mtdparts} shows
$\{mtdparts}, which is not what I want

Reading the source code, I finally came to the conclusion that cdebconf expands
${...} no matter what, and wants it to be a directive.
Reading the doc, I've found that a non-implemented directive does nothing and
is replaced by an empty string, so, here is my ugly hack that works:

db_subst uboot-installer/apply_changes CHANGES $${!}{mtdparts}

This feels a bit wrong, and I think there should be a better way to do that.



-- System Information:
Debian Release: squeeze/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (120, 'unstable'), (105, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.35-rc3+ (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages cdebconf depends on:
ii  debconf   1.5.33 Debian configuration management sy
ii  libc6 2.11.2-2   Embedded GNU C Library: Shared lib
ii  libdebian-installer4  0.74   Library of common debian-installer
ii  libnewt0.52   0.52.11-1  Not Erik's Windowing Toolkit - tex
ii  libslang2 2.2.2-4The S-Lang programming library - r
pn  libtextwrap1  none (no description available)

cdebconf recommends no packages.

Versions of packages cdebconf suggests:
pn  cdebconf-gtk  none (no description available)



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20100807042003.11752.77276.report...@localhost.localdomain