Bug#617943: debian-installer: isolated "make build_netboot" fails due to missing 2.6.32 modules

2011-09-19 Thread Michael Gilbert
Otavio Salvador wrote:
> The installer itself, sometimes, need modifications or fixes to be able to
> handle newer kernel versions so the version that is hard-coded on those is
> the version that is supported by the installer. It is not only a matter of
> recompile installer against the new kernel (sometimes this works by this is
> not guaranteed). Another important point is that there are architectures
> that use different kernels depending on the subarch (e.g armel uses iop32x,
> kirkwood and others) and dynamically it is more difficult to handle this.
> 
> Specifically about the patch it is incomplete since it doesn't handle all
> the architectures thus we can't take it.

Hi,

Sorry I haven't had time to get back to this until just now.  

So, I don't have any of the subarch's to test this, but I believe they
are already handled appropriately in the "UDEBS =" line in my patch.
I'm concluding this based on the .cfg files, for example iop32x.cfg
would produce 2.6.32-5 for the KERNELIMAGEVERSION var, and that is what
I would automatically return from the automatic processing of the
Packages file.

Will it ever be the case that the kernel version as stated in the
debian-installer_binary-ARCH_Packages file will differ from the
hard-coded value in the cfg files?  It seems like they would have to be
the same, otherwise d-i would fail trying to download non-existent
files, but I may be missing something.

Best wishes,
Mike



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/2011092313.27e767e7ade48b285bee5...@gmail.com



Bug#642183: debian-installer: hybrid iso sizing issue for unstable build

2011-09-19 Thread Michael Gilbert
package: debian-installer
version: 20110106
severity: important
tags: patch

d-i fails to build unstable x86 netboot images (see below), which
will become a problem as d-i development moves forward with newer
kernels/packages coming in from unstable.  I've attached a patch
that fixes this by using the default last sector for the msdos
partition instead of a size offset.  This certainly works, but I'm
not sure if its an ideal solution.

Best wishes,
Mike

$ cd build && USE_UDEBS_FROM=unstable make build_netboot
geniso_hybrid_plus_firmware_partition ./tmp/netboot/mini.iso
mkfs.msdos 3.0.9 (31 Jan 2010)

Command (m for help): Command action
   e   extended
   p   primary partition (1-4)
Partition number (1-4, default 2): First sector (24576-36863, default 24576): 
Using default value 24576
Last sector, +sectors or +size{K,M,G} (24576-36863, default 36863): Value out 
of range.
Last sector, +sectors or +size{K,M,G} (24576-36863, default 36863): Last 
sector, +sectors or +size{K,M,G} (24576-36863, default 36863): Value out of 
range.
Last sector, +sectors or +size{K,M,G} (24576-36863, default 36863): Value out 
of range.
Last sector, +sectors or +size{K,M,G} (24576-36863, default 36863): Last 
sector, +sectors or +size{K,M,G} (24576-36863, default 36863): 
make[2]: *** [arch_miniiso] Error 1
make[1]: *** [_build] Error 2
make: *** [build_netboot] Error 2
--- util/geniso_hybrid_plus_firmware_partition.orig	2011-09-19 23:27:56.0 -0400
+++ util/geniso_hybrid_plus_firmware_partition	2011-09-19 23:28:06.0 -0400
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
 echo p
 echo 2
 echo 
-echo +"$firmware_volume_size_M"M
+echo
 
 # Pedantically, set partition type to 1: FAT 16
 echo t


Bug#642179: debian-installer: Installs on drives larger than 2.19TB fails with older bios

2011-09-19 Thread Karl Schmidt
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20110106+squeeze3
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i squeeze



-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash


Install attempts on a Tyan S7002 failed with a drive larger than 2.19TB (would 
fail at the grub installation)

I was able to move an install to a 1TB drive then move to a larger disk - grow 
the partition, but on a kernel update it would no longer boot.

This might have to do with the 2.19TB limitation of MBR - which means a move to 
GUID Partition Table (GPT) and possibly the need for 
a BIOS's that supports GUID. (See: 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GUID_Partition_Table )

In the mean time Debian installer fails to give any warning about larger drives 
and fdisk/sfdisk also fail to warn.


The current kernels support GPT, but it is less than clear how older bios 
interact. It might be that just the boot disk 
needs to be smaller than 2.19TB and that storage disks formatted with GPT will 
work fine on machines with BIOS's that don't support GPT? 
It is also possible that fdisk/cfdisk/sfdisk are failing without warning if one 
tries to use these large drives.

gparted supports EFI/GPT.

I'm thinking that D-i needs to detect the large drive size, possible the 
ability of the bios to work with this drive size and give a warning.

There might be problems supporting 2TB drives with the partioner in D-I that is 
independent to the BIOS. Sadly I have more questions than 
answers and hope someone with a better understanding of this issue writes it up.



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110920010828.31805.60339.reportbug@malaysia.xtronics.network



Bug#642160: installation-reports: no bags

2011-09-19 Thread Sergey
Package: installation-reports
Severity: wishlist

Dear Maintainer,
*** Please consider answering these questions, where appropiate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?
   * What was the outcome of this action?
   * What outcome did you expect instead?

*** End of the template - remove these lines ***


-- Package-specific info:

Boot method: netinstall
Image version: debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso 15.09.11
Date: 

Machine: asus A7U
Partitions: 


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [O ]
Detect network card:[O ]
Configure network:  [O ]
Detect CD:  [O ]
Load installer modules: [O ]
Detect hard drives: [O ]
Partition hard drives:  [O ]
Install base system:[O ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [O ]
User/password setup:[O ]
Install tasks:  [O ]
Install boot loader:[O ]
Overall install:[O ]

Comments/Problems:




-- 

Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report. Please compress large files using gzip.

Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org.

==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer"
DISTRIB_RELEASE="7.0 (wheezy) - installer build 20110915-00:07"
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom

==
Installer hardware-summary:
==
uname -a: Linux A7U 3.0.0-1-amd64 #1 SMP Sun Jul 24 02:24:44 UTC 2011 x86_64 
GNU/Linux
lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: ATI Technologies Inc RS690 Host Bridge 
[1002:7910]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:14f7]
lspci -knn: 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: ATI Technologies Inc RS690 PCI to PCI 
Bridge (Internal gfx) [1002:7912]
lspci -knn: 00:04.0 PCI bridge [0604]: ATI Technologies Inc Device [1002:7914]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport
lspci -knn: 00:05.0 PCI bridge [0604]: ATI Technologies Inc RS690 PCI to PCI 
Bridge (PCI Express Port 1) [1002:7915]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport
lspci -knn: 00:06.0 PCI bridge [0604]: ATI Technologies Inc RS690 PCI to PCI 
Bridge (PCI Express Port 2) [1002:7916]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport
lspci -knn: 00:07.0 PCI bridge [0604]: ATI Technologies Inc RS690 PCI to PCI 
Bridge (PCI Express Port 3) [1002:7917]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport
lspci -knn: 00:12.0 SATA controller [0106]: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 
Non-Raid-5 SATA [1002:4380]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:14f7]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ahci
lspci -knn: 00:13.0 USB Controller [0c03]: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 USB 
(OHCI0) [1002:4387]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:14f7]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:13.1 USB Controller [0c03]: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 USB 
(OHCI1) [1002:4388]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:14f7]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:13.2 USB Controller [0c03]: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 USB 
(OHCI2) [1002:4389]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:14f7]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:13.3 USB Controller [0c03]: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 USB 
(OHCI3) [1002:438a]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:14f7]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:13.4 USB Controller [0c03]: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 USB 
(OHCI4) [1002:438b]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:14f7]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:13.5 USB Controller [0c03]: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 USB 
Controller (EHCI) [1002:4386]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:14f7]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:14.0 SMBus [0c05]: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 SMBus Controller 
[1002:4385] (rev 14)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:14f7]
lspci -knn: 00:14.1 IDE interface [0101]: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 IDE 
[1002:438c]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:14f7]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pata_atiixp
lspci -knn: 00:14.2 Audio device [0403]: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 Azalia 
(Intel HDA) [1002:4383]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:1339]
lspci -knn: 00:14.3 ISA bridge [0601]: ATI Technologies Inc SB600 PCI to LPC 
Bridge [1002:438d]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:14f7]
lspci -knn: 00:14.4 PCI bridge [0604]: ATI Technologies Inc SBx00 PCI to PCI 
Bridge [1002:4384]
lspci -knn: 00:18.0 Host b

Bug#642159: debian-installer preseed broken with apt-cacher-ng mirror

2011-09-19 Thread Matt Weatherford
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20110106+squeeze3
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i




Copied from an Ubuntu bug report, since it resembles my problem as well:


In my preseed file I set "d-i mirror/http/proxy string 
http://apt-cacher:3142/";, this is an apt-cacher-ng proxy. This works correctly 
for installing the system.

I expect "d-i mirror/http/proxy" to only apply to the debian installer http 
proxy (apt proxy), and all other http applications, e.g., wget, curl, lynx to 
not use that setting.

Instead when I run applications from the Kickstart %post section, all HTTP 
connections are proxied; curl, wget, lynx, hg (mercurial), everything. Once the 
system installs and reboots all is good, the only remanence of the 
mirror/http/proxy setting is in /etc/apt/apt.conf, which is fine (though I 
think that should be configurable too). mirror/http/proxy is setting the 
environment variable http_proxy.

Repo:
Set "d-i mirror/http/proxy string http://apt-cacher:3142/"; in a preseed (use 
your local mirror).

Use a Kickstart post section like this:
%post --interpreter=/bin/bash
exec < /dev/tty3 > /dev/ttyS0
chvt 3
(
echo "## http_proxy = $http_proxy"
echo "## lynx dump head"
lynx -dump -head http://example.com
echo "## wget"
wget -O /root/test http://example.com
) 2>&1 | /usr/bin/tee /var/log/post_install.log
chvt 1

After install check /var/log/post_install.log and it will look like:
## http_proxy = http://apt-cacher:3142/
## lynx dump head
HTTP/1.1 403 Forbidden file type or location
Date: Thu Apr 22 16:29:10 2010
Server: Debian Apt-Cacher NG/0.4.6
## wget
--2010-04-22 09:29:10-- http://example.com
Resolving apt-cacher... 10.0.0.10
Connecting to apt-cacher|10.0.0.10|:3142... connected.
Proxy request sent, awaiting response... 403 Forbidden file type or location
2010-04-22 09:29:10 ERROR 403: Forbidden file type or location.

The workaround for me it to reset $http_proxy at the top of %post:
export http_proxy=""
Then all the applications that use http behave normally.

Suggestion:
Don't set $http_proxy with "d-i mirror/http/proxy", maybe set $apt_http_proxy 
if d-i needs an environment variable. For users that need a general proxy a 
setting like "d-i http/proxy" could be created.




-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.2
  APT prefers stable-updates
  APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686 (SMP w/16 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-- no debconf information



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/20110919204447.8659.48512.report...@kahlo.csde.washington.edu



Bug#642031: debootstrap: Debootstrap error when host and build have different kernels

2011-09-19 Thread Milomak
On Sep 19, 2011 5:46 PM, "Joey Hess"  wrote:
>
> Milo Mak wrote:
> > debian live-helper # chroot /data/ext/live-helper/chroot
> > root@debian:/# dpkg --force-depends --install
> > /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.11.2-10_amd64.deb
> > (Reading database ... 349 files and directories currently installed.)
> > Unpacking libc6 (from .../libc6_2.11.2-10_amd64.deb) ...
> > [: 392: Illegal number: 3.0-3.dmz.2-liquorix-amd64
> > /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: 392: arithmetic expression: expecting EOF:
> > "3.0-3.dmz.2-liquorix-amd64"
> > dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.11.2-10_amd64.deb
> > (--install):
>
> This code from the libc6 2.11.2-10 preinst is broken when presented
> with a kernel version with only two numbers, like "3.0-foo". One of
> likely many reasons that Debian versions the kernel 3.0.0-foo.
>
> linux_compare_versions () {
>verA=$(($(echo "$1" | sed 's/\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\).*/\1 \*
1 + \2 \* 100 + \3/')))
>verB=$(($(echo "$3" | sed 's/\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\).*/\1 \*
1 + \2 \* 100 + \3/')))
>
>test $verA -$2 $verB
> }
>
> It's fixed already in the version in unstable. (Although it's amusing
> to note this code in turn falls over if Linus decides a better kernel
> version is "4-foo".)
>
> linux_compare_versions () {
>verA=$(($(echo "$1" | sed 's/^\([0-9]*\.[0-9]*\)\([^.0-9]\|$\)/\1.0\2/;
s/\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\).*/\1 \* 1 + \2 \* 100 + \3/')))
>verB=$(($(echo "$3" | sed 's/^\([0-9]*\.[0-9]*\)\([^.0-9]\|$\)/\1.0\2/;
s/\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\).*/\1 \* 1 + \2 \* 100 + \3/')))
>
>test $verA -$2 $verB
> }
>
> I'm unsure about trying to work around this in debootstrap, despite
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debootstrap/+bug/802985 having
> a LD_PRELOAD hack to do so.
>
> --
> see shy jo

Ah I see. Compiled a kernel with a name in the form of 3.x.y-foo and it did
resolve the issue.

Thanks
Milo Mak


Bug#642115: debian-installer: guided full disk encryption + LVM complains about insecure swap

2011-09-19 Thread Joey Hess
Jon Dowland wrote:
> If you choose Guided / Encrypted / LVM as the partitioning type, the resulting
> scheme chosen by d-i basically looks like
> 
> (physical partition) → (encrypted volume) → (LVM) → (swap)
> 
> Thus, the swap is encrypted, but LVM sits between them.

The code is this, and Max changed it most recently:

# Accept e.g. swap on lvm on crypto
if echo $device | grep -q "^/dev/mapper/"; then
if dm_is_safe "$device"; then
continue
fi
fi

I wonder if perhaps the device for LVM does not look like
/dev/mapper/ anymore. Perhaps it's seeing /dev// instead?

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: reassign 642115 to partman-crypto

2011-09-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> reassign 642115 partman-crypto
Bug #642115 [debian-installer] debian-installer: guided full disk encryption + 
LVM complains about insecure swap
Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'partman-crypto'.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
642115: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642115
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13164474226870.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Processed: retitle 642031 to should debootstrap workaround libc6 kernel uname parsing bug (affects systems running non-debian kernels)

2011-09-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> retitle 642031 should debootstrap workaround libc6 kernel uname parsing bug 
> (affects systems running non-debian kernels)
Bug #642031 [debootstrap] debootstrap: Debootstrap error when host and build 
have different kernels
Changed Bug title to 'should debootstrap workaround libc6 kernel uname parsing 
bug (affects systems running non-debian kernels)' from 'debootstrap: 
Debootstrap error when host and build have different kernels'
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
642031: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=642031
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.13164473846665.transcr...@bugs.debian.org



Re: Possible debootstrap issue related to different host computer kernel?

2011-09-19 Thread Joey Hess
Jongi wrote:
> I have tried to send a reportbug but am unsure as to whether it was successful
> (prior reportbugs for other packages have not been).

Your bug report went through.
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?submitter=milo...@gmail.com

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#642031: debootstrap: Debootstrap error when host and build have different kernels

2011-09-19 Thread Joey Hess
Milo Mak wrote:
> debian live-helper # chroot /data/ext/live-helper/chroot
> root@debian:/# dpkg --force-depends --install
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.11.2-10_amd64.deb
> (Reading database ... 349 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking libc6 (from .../libc6_2.11.2-10_amd64.deb) ...
> [: 392: Illegal number: 3.0-3.dmz.2-liquorix-amd64
> /var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/preinst: 392: arithmetic expression: expecting EOF:
> "3.0-3.dmz.2-liquorix-amd64"
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.11.2-10_amd64.deb
> (--install):

This code from the libc6 2.11.2-10 preinst is broken when presented 
with a kernel version with only two numbers, like "3.0-foo". One of
likely many reasons that Debian versions the kernel 3.0.0-foo.

linux_compare_versions () {
verA=$(($(echo "$1" | sed 's/\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\).*/\1 \* 
1 + \2 \* 100 + \3/')))
verB=$(($(echo "$3" | sed 's/\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\).*/\1 \* 
1 + \2 \* 100 + \3/')))

test $verA -$2 $verB
}

It's fixed already in the version in unstable. (Although it's amusing
to note this code in turn falls over if Linus decides a better kernel
version is "4-foo".)

linux_compare_versions () {
verA=$(($(echo "$1" | sed 's/^\([0-9]*\.[0-9]*\)\([^.0-9]\|$\)/\1.0\2/; 
s/\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\).*/\1 \* 1 + \2 \* 100 + \3/')))
verB=$(($(echo "$3" | sed 's/^\([0-9]*\.[0-9]*\)\([^.0-9]\|$\)/\1.0\2/; 
s/\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\)\.\([0-9]*\).*/\1 \* 1 + \2 \* 100 + \3/')))

test $verA -$2 $verB
}

I'm unsure about trying to work around this in debootstrap, despite 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/debootstrap/+bug/802985 having
a LD_PRELOAD hack to do so.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#642115: debian-installer: guided full disk encryption + LVM complains about insecure swap

2011-09-19 Thread Jon Dowland
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal

Hi,

Using a daily build:

-rw-r--r-- 1 libvirt-qemu kvm  240M Sep 16 10:00 debian-testing-i386-netinst.iso

If you choose Guided / Encrypted / LVM as the partitioning type, the resulting
scheme chosen by d-i basically looks like

(physical partition) → (encrypted volume) → (LVM) → (swap)

Thus, the swap is encrypted, but LVM sits between them.

After choosing that partitioning scheme, you are then asked to input the
encryption pass-phrase.  You are then shown the scheme layed out like with the
manual partitioner.

After you accept this, you are warned that the swap space is unsafe.  d-i
refuses to proceed at this point.  If you set the swap LV to "do not use", you
can proceed (without swap) and fix it later on.

I think this is incorrect and the swap space *is* safe, since it is sitting
on top of an encrypted partition.  However either way, the guided partitioner
should suggest a scheme which is safe.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 6.0.1
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (700, 'stable'), (600, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (i686)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash



-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110919144713.ga19...@inoshiro.ncl.ac.uk



Bug#627015: From Mrs.Lerato Mutasa Please Kindly Open the Attachment File Thanks

2011-09-19 Thread Norber Universal Debian
-- 

2011/8/12 MRS LERATO MUTASA 

>
>
> From Mrs.Lerato Mutasa
> Please Kindly Open the Attachment File
> Thanks


O YES SUCK MY


\_
|
|
|
|

THANK YOU MRS LERATO YOU SUCK VERY GOOD I TELL IT ALL OF MY PEOPLE
-- 

--