Processed: Re: Bug#677168: Weekly image fails in Busibox
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> reassign 677168 apt
Bug #677168 {Done: Milan Kupcevic }
[installation-reports] Weekly image fails in Busibox
Bug reassigned from package 'installation-reports' to 'apt'.
Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #677168 to the same values
previously set
Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #677168 to the same values
previously set
> forcemerge 674100 677168
Bug #674100 {Done: Michael Vogt } [apt] apt: apt-cdrom add
generates broken cdroms.list
Bug #673250 {Done: Michael Vogt } [apt] simple-cdd: Installing
wheezy dist from CD fails at base-installer stage
Bug #673997 {Done: Michael Vogt } [apt] installer fails with
use apt-cdrom to make this cd-rom
Bug #674488 {Done: Michael Vogt } [apt] Debian testing weekly
CD images (i386, amd64) fail to install the base system (starting from
21-May-2012)
Bug #677168 {Done: Milan Kupcevic } [apt] Weekly
image fails in Busibox
Severity set to 'important' from 'normal'
Added indication that 677168 affects simple-cdd,cdrom,installation-reports
Marked as fixed in versions apt/0.9.6.
Marked as found in versions apt/0.9.5 and apt/0.9.3.
Added tag(s) d-i and patch.
Bug #673250 {Done: Michael Vogt } [apt] simple-cdd: Installing
wheezy dist from CD fails at base-installer stage
Bug #673997 {Done: Michael Vogt } [apt] installer fails with
use apt-cdrom to make this cd-rom
Bug #674488 {Done: Michael Vogt } [apt] Debian testing weekly
CD images (i386, amd64) fail to install the base system (starting from
21-May-2012)
Merged 673250 673997 674100 674488 677168
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
673250: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673250
673997: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673997
674100: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674100
674488: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=674488
677168: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=677168
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.133946897226179.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jun 11 04:54 debian-cd@pettersson Dsource http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/Dsource * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jun 11 04:54 debian-cd@pettersson 9source http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/9source * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jun 11 04:54 debian-cd@pettersson 3source http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/3source * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jun 11 04:54 debian-cd@pettersson source http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/source Totals: 179 builds (4 failed, 0 old) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1sefsl-0007ds...@ravel.debian.org
Re: Tweaking tasks
Steve McIntyre wrote: > No, not yet at least. To be honest, I've had a lot of pressure to just > add all the Recommends anyway recently to match what people would > install by default. That's what I've done so far. It's complicated. Sometimes we drop a package from a direct Recommends in a task-* package because a metapackage like gnome has the same Recommends. I do feel that deeper recommends could be omitted (or sorted to the end of the package list) and get a working CD, but it would require testing. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian & the FSF Secure Boot petition
Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > Dear d-i hackers, I've been contacted by Paul Wise about FSF campaign on > "secure boot" [1] (thanks Paul!). As observed by various commenters over > the net, it is indeed striking that no FOSS distros is in there. I plan > to contact the FSF asking that Debian is listed as an endorser of the > campaign. > > As you are the Debian people working on our installer, I think it should > be done in agreement with you. > > So, what do you think? Do you see any reason why Debian should /not/ > endorse such a campaign? Are you aware of any other initiative on the > same vein that we should support to make our worries on that front > heard? No objection from me, I've just signed it. I can imagine that d-i might have to do something to support users of such systems, similar to how we have non-free boot media to support users who need firmware to install. The petition allows us to do something like that, as long as we discourage use of it, similarly to how we discourage use of the non-free boot media. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Tweaking tasks
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 06:14:47PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
>Steve McIntyre wrote:
>> Following up from the thread about lack of space...
>>
>> A couple of weeks back I rewrote the task support in debian-cd to deal
>> with the change from tasks-in-Packages to task meta-packages. After a
>> lot of local testing, today is the first time the weeklies have been
>> built using the new code. There's probably some more tweaking due for
>> Recommends handling yet, but this seems to work at the moment.
>
>Wow, that's a relief! Thank you immensely.
No problem... I dropped the ball on this ages ago, and totally forgot
about it until you reminded me recently :-/
>> The last package on amd64 CD#1 is libgjs0b. task-desktop fits on CD#1,
>> but task-gnome-desktop is ~90 packages into CD#2. gnome-shell-common
>> doesn't even make CD#1, which means the desktop will be a
>> little... sparse. The full sorted package list is at
>
>Is this with or without Recommends of tasks?
This is with Recommends of tasks, yes. It wouldn't go very far
otherwise.
>Does it omit the (probably uncessary) Recommends of packages
>recommended by tasks?
No, not yet at least. To be honest, I've had a lot of pressure to just
add all the Recommends anyway recently to match what people would
install by default. That's what I've done so far.
The code changes should be reasonably easy to follow if you want to
look - see the new version of tools/update_tasks. It plumbs into the
existing set of tasks, generating task-{essential,full}-$desktop based
on the task packages that we find listed in tasksel-data. Then the
existing sort_deps code is used to pull in the dependencies and
recommends for the task packages. This seems to work OK without having
to make major structural changes to debian-cd. Review/comments
welcome, of course... :-)
--
Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com
"Further comment on how I feel about IBM will appear once I've worked out
whether they're being malicious or incompetent. Capital letters are forecast."
Matthew Garrett, http://www.livejournal.com/users/mjg59/30675.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120611224110.gs3...@einval.com
Re: Tweaking tasks
Steve McIntyre wrote: > Following up from the thread about lack of space... > > A couple of weeks back I rewrote the task support in debian-cd to deal > with the change from tasks-in-Packages to task meta-packages. After a > lot of local testing, today is the first time the weeklies have been > built using the new code. There's probably some more tweaking due for > Recommends handling yet, but this seems to work at the moment. Wow, that's a relief! Thank you immensely. > The last package on amd64 CD#1 is libgjs0b. task-desktop fits on CD#1, > but task-gnome-desktop is ~90 packages into CD#2. gnome-shell-common > doesn't even make CD#1, which means the desktop will be a > little... sparse. The full sorted package list is at Is this with or without Recommends of tasks? Does it omit the (probably uncessary) Recommends of packages recommended by tasks? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#676819: Can't shutdown, reboot, suspend, hibernate or switch user when logging out of the LXDE session.
Hi, On 09-06-2012 17:19, Bertil Kronlund wrote: [...] There are some old bug reports related to lxde-session and lxpanel, e.g #534222. good catch! Can you look into the logs if there's more info on what is happening? -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd656d4.4070...@debianpt.org
Re: Como criar dua-boot no meu computador Debian e Windows
Olá, O manual de instalação [1] deverá responder ás tuas questões. Esta lista destina-se ao desenvolvimento do instalador (e em inglês), para suporte deves utilizar as listas debian-user-* [2][3] ou os fóruns Debian [4] que são uma excelente fonte de informação. É uma boa prática, antes de instalar um sistema operativo, fazer backups. Para o 'triple-boot' que pretendes terás de ter espaço livre no disco para instalar Debian. -8< Hi, the installation manual [1] should answer your questions. This list it's for the installer development (and in English), for support you should use the lists debian-user-* [2] [3] or the Debian forums [4], which are an excellent source of information. It's a good practice, before installing an operating system, to backup. For the triple-boot you want you must have free space on disk to install Debian. 1 - http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/manual/pt.i386/index.html 2 - https://lists.debian.org/debian-user/ 3 - https://lists.debian.org/debian-user-portuguese/ 4 - http://forums.debian.net/ -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd63878.8080...@debianpt.org
Kernel Problem bitte um Hilfe
Hallo ich wollte mal Debian wheezy neu aufsetzen. Ich habe mir die Alpha 1 Version des Debian Wheezy installers runter geladen Installation ging auch ohne Probleme aber als ich das neu installierte system Botten wollte blieb der Kernel ohne Fehlermeldung bei Waiting to /dev. hängen. Mein MB ist ein Asus rampage II und meine Grafikkarte ist ein Zotac Nvidia Geforce GTX550Ti AMP OverClocked Edition. Ich denke mal das es an der Nvidia Karte liegt das der Kernel Hängt wie kann ich das Problem lösen? ich kann ja das Linux system nicht mal starten. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4fd629f0.4060...@aschershain.de
Re: tasksel todo
Le Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:23:15AM +0200, Bastian Blank a écrit : > > Fonts > = > hungarian-desktop for example _depends_ on a large amount of fonts. None > of them hungarian specific. Hello everybody, talking about fonts, do you think it woud be possible to have a task that would install a default set of fonts for most languages that an average user would meet ? For instance, all languages used in Wikipedia for which a font is available in Debian ? Have a nice day, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120611104759.gb7...@falafel.plessy.net
Tweaking tasks
Hiya, Following up from the thread about lack of space... A couple of weeks back I rewrote the task support in debian-cd to deal with the change from tasks-in-Packages to task meta-packages. After a lot of local testing, today is the first time the weeklies have been built using the new code. There's probably some more tweaking due for Recommends handling yet, but this seems to work at the moment. Here's a summary of what fits where, for amd64 CDs. On i386, space is used even more quickly so the desired tasks are pushed further down; AFAICS this is because of two flavours worth of kernel modules being picked up. Gnome = The last package on amd64 CD#1 is libgjs0b. task-desktop fits on CD#1, but task-gnome-desktop is ~90 packages into CD#2. gnome-shell-common doesn't even make CD#1, which means the desktop will be a little... sparse. The full sorted package list is at http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/tmp/new-tasks/gnome-cd.list.gz KDE === The last package on amd64 CD#1 is plasma-widget-lancelot. task-desktop fits on CD#1, but task-kde-desktop is about 40 packages into (what would be) CD#2. The full sorted package list is at http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/tmp/new-tasks/kde-cd.list.gz LIGHT (lxde/xfce) = The last package on amd64 CD#1 is python-libxml2. The core tasks fit fine (task-desktop, task-lxde-desktop, task-xfce-desktop), well within the the space of CD#1. Full sorted list at http://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/tmp/new-tasks/light-cd.list.gz -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com Welcome my son, welcome to the machine. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120611103648.ga10...@einval.com
tasksel todo
Hi This is some sort of tasksel todo. Remove tasksel-data === tasksel-data was introduced to help derivates change it. However most of the information is now installed as packages and more should come. Also tasksel and tasksel-data currently have a recursive dependency. So this is not gonna work without changes to tasksel anyway. My proposal is to move all missing information to the packages. The task packages should be moved to a different source package, so tasksel only provides the scripts and the tasks can be easily replaced without medling with tasksel themself. Task dependencies = Tasks currently don't depend on each other. For example I can install task-german-desktop without task-desktop. tasksel have some internal logic to resolve this, but I think this should be also enforced on the package level. Base localization task == util-linux-locales is currently included in some languages but not in others. Such packages should move into it's own base task. Different dictionaries == Currently we may install four different dictionaries: - hunspell - aspell - w* - i* Sometimes hunspell is included in the desktop task, sometimes in the base local task. Fonts = hungarian-desktop for example _depends_ on a large amount of fonts. None of them hungarian specific. Bastian -- Spock: The odds of surviving another attack are 13562190123 to 1, Captain. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120611092314.ga7...@wavehammer.waldi.eu.org
