Processed: busybox: diff for NMU version 1:1.20.0-8.1
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: tags 701381 + pending Bug #701381 [src:busybox] busybox: ftbfs with eglibc-2.17 Added tag(s) pending. thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 701381: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=701381 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.137016873429244.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#701381: busybox: diff for NMU version 1:1.20.0-8.1
tags 701381 + pending
thanks
Dear maintainer,
I've prepared an NMU for busybox (versioned as 1:1.20.0-8.1) and
uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I
should delay it longer.
Regards,
Aron
diff -Nru busybox-1.20.0/debian/changelog busybox-1.20.0/debian/changelog
--- busybox-1.20.0/debian/changelog 2013-03-02 20:42:49.0 +0800
+++ busybox-1.20.0/debian/changelog 2013-06-02 18:04:24.0 +0800
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+busybox (1:1.20.0-8.1) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Non-maintainer upload.
+ * eglibc-2.17.patch - backport upstream patch (Closes: #701381)
+
+ -- Aron Xu a...@debian.org Sun, 02 Jun 2013 17:59:36 +0800
+
busybox (1:1.20.0-8) unstable; urgency=low
* grep-fix-grep--Fw-not-respecting-the--w-option.patch - implement
diff -Nru busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/eglibc-2.17.patch busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/eglibc-2.17.patch
--- busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/eglibc-2.17.patch 1970-01-01 08:00:00.0 +0800
+++ busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/eglibc-2.17.patch 2013-06-02 17:56:16.0 +0800
@@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+From c5fe9f7b723f949457263ef8e22ab807d5b549ce Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
+From: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
+Date: Fri, 06 Jul 2012 03:19:09 +
+Subject: include sys/resource.h where needed
+
+We use functions from sys/resource.h in misc applets, but don't include
+the header. This breaks building with newer glibc versions, so add the
+include where needed.
+
+Signed-off-by: Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
+---
+--- a/loginutils/passwd.c
b/loginutils/passwd.c
+@@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
+
+ #include libbb.h
+ #include syslog.h
++#include sys/resource.h /* setrlimit */
+
+ static void nuke_str(char *str)
+ {
+--- a/miscutils/time.c
b/miscutils/time.c
+@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
+ //usage: \n -v Verbose
+
+ #include libbb.h
++#include sys/resource.h /* getrusage */
+
+ /* Information on the resources used by a child process. */
+ typedef struct {
+--- a/networking/inetd.c
b/networking/inetd.c
+@@ -165,6 +165,7 @@
+ //usage: \n (default: 0 - disabled)
+
+ #include syslog.h
++#include sys/resource.h /* setrlimit */
+ #include sys/un.h
+
+ #include libbb.h
+--- a/networking/ntpd.c
b/networking/ntpd.c
+@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
+ #include libbb.h
+ #include math.h
+ #include netinet/ip.h /* For IPTOS_LOWDELAY definition */
++#include sys/resource.h /* setpriority */
+ #include sys/timex.h
+ #ifndef IPTOS_LOWDELAY
+ # define IPTOS_LOWDELAY 0x10
+--- a/networking/ntpd_simple.c
b/networking/ntpd_simple.c
+@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
+ */
+ #include libbb.h
+ #include netinet/ip.h /* For IPTOS_LOWDELAY definition */
++#include sys/resource.h /* setpriority */
+ #ifndef IPTOS_LOWDELAY
+ # define IPTOS_LOWDELAY 0x10
+ #endif
+--- a/runit/chpst.c
b/runit/chpst.c
+@@ -91,6 +91,7 @@
+ //usage: \n a SIGXCPU after N seconds
+
+ #include libbb.h
++#include sys/resource.h /* getrlimit */
+
+ /*
+ Five applets here: chpst, envdir, envuidgid, setuidgid, softlimit.
+--- a/shell/shell_common.c
b/shell/shell_common.c
+@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
+ */
+ #include libbb.h
+ #include shell_common.h
++#include sys/resource.h /* getrlimit */
+
+ const char defifsvar[] ALIGN1 = IFS= \t\n;
+
diff -Nru busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/series busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/series
--- busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/series 2013-03-01 16:54:07.0 +0800
+++ busybox-1.20.0/debian/patches/series 2013-06-02 17:51:44.0 +0800
@@ -33,3 +33,5 @@
dont-force-no-alignment-for-s390.patch
stop-checking-ancient-kernel-version.patch
+
+eglibc-2.17.patch
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Bug#701381: busybox: diff for NMU version 1:1.20.0-8.1
02.06.2013 14:25, Aron Xu wrote: Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for busybox (versioned as 1:1.20.0-8.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. I'm still waiting for the stable updates for busybox which is currently in testing, see #702278. It is more important at this time to get things fixed for wheezy than for the next release of debian. Thanks, /mjt\ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51ab1e95.30...@msgid.tls.msk.ru
Processing of busybox_1.20.0-8.1_amd64.changes
busybox_1.20.0-8.1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: busybox_1.20.0-8.1.dsc busybox_1.20.0-8.1.debian.tar.gz busybox-syslogd_1.20.0-8.1_all.deb busybox_1.20.0-8.1_amd64.deb busybox-static_1.20.0-8.1_amd64.deb busybox-udeb_1.20.0-8.1_amd64.udeb udhcpc_1.20.0-8.1_amd64.deb udhcpd_1.20.0-8.1_amd64.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1uj5w4-00084c...@franck.debian.org
Bug#701381: busybox: diff for NMU version 1:1.20.0-8.1
On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Michael Tokarev m...@tls.msk.ru wrote: 02.06.2013 14:25, Aron Xu wrote: Dear maintainer, I've prepared an NMU for busybox (versioned as 1:1.20.0-8.1) and uploaded it to DELAYED/3. Please feel free to tell me if I should delay it longer. I'm still waiting for the stable updates for busybox which is currently in testing, see #702278. It is more important at this time to get things fixed for wheezy than for the next release of debian. Thanks, /mjt\ 1:1.20.0-8 has migrated to testing, do you think it's okay to keep -8.1 in unstable by keeping #701381 open until the pu is worked out, or you prefer to remove it from DELAYED? Regards, Aron -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAMr=8w5u-u0wrw9jmbew4byz0yymk-r6pzfwsysm5gxekw_...@mail.gmail.com
Re: task-desktop: default desktop environment for Jessie
On Fri 31 May 2013 at 15:11:50 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (31/05/2013): It would probably be good to get that discussion started early during this cycle to reduce the surprise factor. Since it was rather difficult to fit gnome onto 1 cd in wheezy (and I think some pieces were left off anyway), I think it makes sense now to start moving toward something like xfce as the default that's small, and mostly capable, and 4.10 (now making its way into unstable) brings much needed accessibility features. A somewhat related question is whether we're going to keep trying to fit stuff onto CD#1, as opposed to moving to supporting various “USB key sizes”. If I'm not mistaken, Steve has expressed such a wish (or intent) during the last wheezy preparation steps. As a point of reference, I still have (and use every now and then) an old laptop that has a cd-rom but no dvd-rom, and its bios does not support usb booting. I have two desktops and a laptop (not all that old, five years) which do not entertain booting from USB. So you learn to be resourceful. For Debian we have the hd-media kernel and initrd. grub-mkrescue will make an iso with them and include a grub.cfg. iso-scan will find whatever ISO you choose to put on another USB stick. I hope Debian will continue to support those of us have such 'ancient' machines. Eventually, we are going to run out of ideas or patience with fitting a useful GNOME, KDE etc on CD#1. Its a lost battle. This is the time for innovation. Get it discussed and decided now and not two or three months before the next release. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130602183635.GB26394@desktop
Re: task-desktop: default desktop environment for Jessie
On Sun 02 Jun 2013 at 19:36:35 +0100, Brian Potkin wrote: For Debian we have the hd-media kernel and initrd. grub-mkrescue will make an iso with them and include a grub.cfg. iso-scan will find whatever ISO you choose to put on another USB stick. I hope Debian will continue to support those of us have such 'ancient' machines. And because it wasn't very clear: I was referring to burning the ISO made by GRUB to a CD and having iso-scan picking up whatever other Debian ISO is on a provided USB stick. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130602185558.GC26394@desktop
Re: task-desktop: default desktop environment for Jessie
On Sun, 2013-06-02 at 19:36 +0100, Brian Potkin wrote: On Fri 31 May 2013 at 15:11:50 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (31/05/2013): It would probably be good to get that discussion started early during this cycle to reduce the surprise factor. Since it was rather difficult to fit gnome onto 1 cd in wheezy (and I think some pieces were left off anyway), I think it makes sense now to start moving toward something like xfce as the default that's small, and mostly capable, and 4.10 (now making its way into unstable) brings much needed accessibility features. A somewhat related question is whether we're going to keep trying to fit stuff onto CD#1, as opposed to moving to supporting various “USB key sizes”. If I'm not mistaken, Steve has expressed such a wish (or intent) during the last wheezy preparation steps. As a point of reference, I still have (and use every now and then) an old laptop that has a cd-rom but no dvd-rom, and its bios does not support usb booting. I have two desktops and a laptop (not all that old, five years) which do not entertain booting from USB. So you learn to be resourceful. For Debian we have the hd-media kernel and initrd. grub-mkrescue will make an iso with them and include a grub.cfg. iso-scan will find whatever ISO you choose to put on another USB stick. I hope Debian will continue to support those of us have such 'ancient' machines. [...] Booting from USB has been a standard feature for ~10 years; see e.g. http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/wiki/usb_booting.html#BIOS_Limitations. So those machines may not be ancient but they apparently have a crap BIOS. While we should probably continue to support 5 year old machines in general, I don't see why the default installation media should be held back by specific BIOS defects. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings You can't have everything. Where would you put it? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
BIOS not reachable in laptop: 29 May 2013
BIOS Version : FUJITSU // Phoenix Technologies Ltd. // Version 1.10 // Release date as 24/05/2012 Other BIOS details : Phoenix SecureCore Tiano (TM), Copyright 1985-2011 FUJITSU Laptop : LH532 L-series lifebook, Core i3 3rd generation, 500 GB harddisk, 4 GB ram I installed debian wheezy 7.0.0 u1 using netinstall-amd64 through USB, now bios is overwritten by grub2. I am unable to boot from USB, DVD etc. Only booting from harddisk. I detached the harddisk but all now available is grub2. If this needs to be posted in alternate forum or relevant guide, kindly provide the link. Installation : 1) I provided EFIBOOT partition as 10GB whereas maximum says 256MB. 2) While package installation was happening from network mirrors ( cdn.debian.net) I left the machine. When I came back installation was done, taking some default values (if at all). Queries : 1) Do I need to flash BIOS, where I can get the relevant .bin file? How to do it? Relevant guide link?. 2) Grub2 : Chainloader, boot, loadbios, fakebios for the required image, does this help? Relevant guide link? Where to find the image (vmlinuz from 1st cd does not work)? 3) Can I boot from USB-netinstall (hd0), to reinstall debian 7.0.0 with different partitioning? I already messed with fdisk, cfdisk, fsck etc. 4) Where can I take care, so that in next installation it does not override the BIOS with GRUB2? Is it in BIOS setting or debian installation? I am unaware of UEFI if it has to do with it else ignore. Kindly be patient, and thanks for the same. Thanks, Suramya
Re: task-desktop: default desktop environment for Jessie
On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 07:36:35PM +0100, Brian Potkin wrote: On Fri 31 May 2013 at 15:11:50 -0400, Michael Gilbert wrote: On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:06 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (31/05/2013): It would probably be good to get that discussion started early during this cycle to reduce the surprise factor. Since it was rather difficult to fit gnome onto 1 cd in wheezy (and I think some pieces were left off anyway), I think it makes sense now to start moving toward something like xfce as the default that's small, and mostly capable, and 4.10 (now making its way into unstable) brings much needed accessibility features. A somewhat related question is whether we're going to keep trying to fit stuff onto CD#1, as opposed to moving to supporting various “USB key sizes”. If I'm not mistaken, Steve has expressed such a wish (or intent) during the last wheezy preparation steps. As a point of reference, I still have (and use every now and then) an old laptop that has a cd-rom but no dvd-rom, and its bios does not support usb booting. I have two desktops and a laptop (not all that old, five years) which do not entertain booting from USB. So you learn to be resourceful. For Debian we have the hd-media kernel and initrd. grub-mkrescue will make an iso with them and include a grub.cfg. iso-scan will find whatever ISO you choose to put on another USB stick. I hope Debian will continue to support those of us have such 'ancient' machines. Eventually, we are going to run out of ideas or patience with fitting a useful GNOME, KDE etc on CD#1. Its a lost battle. This is the time for innovation. Get it discussed and decided now and not two or three months before the next release. If gnome or KDE doesn't fit on the first CD, it makes no sense to pretend it does. Put something that *does* fit on the first CD. It's perfectly possible to put the packages for a viable Linux system on a single CD, but you'd need a desktop that takes less CD space. If someone wants to have gnome or KDE anyway, he's can acquire a second CD, or access the net after installing packages from the first CD, or use a DVD or USB key or something bigger. I'm not in favour of software bloat. Let those who are use the second CD or another installation medium. -- hendrik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130602192745.ga20...@topoi.pooq.com
Re: task-desktop: default desktop environment for Jessie
On 02/06/13 20:27, Hendrik Boom wrote: If someone wants to have gnome or KDE anyway, he's can acquire a second CD, or access the net after installing packages from the first CD, or use a DVD or USB key or something bigger. That's an interesting idea... if CD-1 was XFCE, would it contain enough of the common/base packages that only one additional CD is needed to complete either a GNOME or a KDE desktop? Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51aba008.7010...@pyro.eu.org
Re: BIOS not reachable in laptop: 29 May 2013
On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 00:32 +0530, Suramya Rajwade wrote: BIOS Version : FUJITSU // Phoenix Technologies Ltd. // Version 1.10 // Release date as 24/05/2012 Other BIOS details : Phoenix SecureCore Tiano (TM), Copyright 1985-2011 FUJITSU Laptop : LH532 L-series lifebook, Core i3 3rd generation, 500 GB harddisk, 4 GB ram I installed debian wheezy 7.0.0 u1 using netinstall-amd64 through USB, now bios is overwritten by grub2. No, it isn't. I am unable to boot from USB, DVD etc. Only booting from harddisk. I detached the harddisk but all now available is grub2. If this needs to be posted in alternate forum or relevant guide, kindly provide the link. [...] It sounds like your BIOS implements Fast Boot http://mjg59.dreamwidth.org/24869.html, but then I don't understand how you booted the installer originally. According to http://superuser.com/a/535953, you can enter BIOS setup from grub-efi by going to the command line and running 'fwsetup'. From here you may be able to select a new boot device or disable Fast Boot. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings You can't have everything. Where would you put it? signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: task-desktop: default desktop environment for Jessie
On Sun 02 Jun 2013 at 20:11:48 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: Booting from USB has been a standard feature for ~10 years; see e.g. http://www.damnsmalllinux.org/wiki/usb_booting.html#BIOS_Limitations. So those machines may not be ancient but they apparently have a crap BIOS. While we should probably continue to support 5 year old machines in general, I don't see why the default installation media should be held back by specific BIOS defects. Yes, three crap BIOSs. The one on the laptop doesn't even offer to boot from USB. The desktops do, but don't. All within your ~10 years range. And no, I do not expect or want Debian to be held back by these deficiencies. One of my points was that I cope with the situation within Debian (via hd-media, for example) and that it doesn't present a big problem at present. Although I did not want to get thoroughly involved in it, my other point was that a CD's size cannot be expanded but that of a USB device can be adjusted by choosing the device. Do we want to be held back by the constraints imposed by the capacity of a shiny disk? Not that I am advocating abandoning CDs in Debian, but surely we must alter focus. Either that or we continue, as we did during the Wheezy cycle, to devote more and more effort into maintaining the status quo. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130602213749.GD26394@desktop
Linux kernel ABI bump in unstable: from 3.8-2 to 3.9-1
Linux kernel ABI bump in unstable: from 3.8-2 to 3.9-1 Full summary: http://d-i.debian.org/kernel-summary.html#unstable -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ujif2-0007t2...@ravel.debian.org
Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * OLD BUILD:armel May 27 08:09 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:armel May 27 08:12 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_network-console_glantank http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_glantank.log * OLD BUILD:armel May 27 08:15 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_network-console_n2100 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_n2100.log * OLD BUILD:armel May 27 08:18 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_network-console_ss4000e http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_ss4000e.log * OLD BUILD:armel May 27 08:21 buildd@ancina build_kirkwood_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:armel May 27 08:22 buildd@ancina build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk.log * FAILED BUILD: armel bMay 27 08:22/b buildd@ancina build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk.log * OLD BUILD:armel May 27 08:25 buildd@ancina build_kirkwood_network-console http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_network-console.log * OLD BUILD:armel May 27 08:29 buildd@ancina build_orion5x_network-console http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_orion5x_network-console.log * OLD BUILD:armel May 27 08:32 buildd@ancina build_versatile_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_versatile_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:armel May 27 08:34 buildd@ancina build_ads_cf http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_ads_cf.log * FAILED BUILD: armhf Jun 01 09:46 buildd@hasse build_mx5_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armhf/daily/build_mx5_netboot-gtk.log * OLD BUILD:ia64 May 26 00:12 buildd@alkman build_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/ia64/daily/build_cdrom.log * OLD BUILD:ia64 May 26 00:16 buildd@alkman build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/ia64/daily/build_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 Jun 03 00:32 buildd@fano build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 Jun 03 00:34 buildd@fano build_netboot-9 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot-9.log * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 Jun 03 00:36 buildd@fano build_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot-gtk.log * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 Jun 03 00:39 buildd@fano build_netboot-gtk-9 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot-gtk-9.log * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-i386 Jun 03 00:33 buildd@finzi build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-i386/daily/build_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-i386 Jun 03 00:37 buildd@finzi build_netboot-9 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-i386/daily/build_netboot-9.log * FAILED BUILD: mips Jun 03 00:10 buildd@lucatelli build_malta_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_malta_netboot-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mips Jun 03 00:11 buildd@lucatelli build_r4k-ip22_cdrom-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_r4k-ip22_cdrom-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mips Jun 03 00:12 buildd@lucatelli build_r4k-ip22_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_r4k-ip22_netboot-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mips Jun 03 00:13 buildd@lucatelli build_r5k-ip32_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_r5k-ip32_netboot-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mips Jun 03 00:14 buildd@lucatelli build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mips Jun 03 00:15 buildd@lucatelli build_miniiso http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_miniiso.log * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Jun 03 00:08 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Jun 03 00:08 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_ssh http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_ssh.log * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Jun 03 00:09 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_common
