Processed: Bug#717511: partman-basicfilesystems: warn if bootable partition is not ext2 on Pegasos machines
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 717511 Bug#717511: partman-basicfilesystems: warn if bootable > partition is not ext2 on Pegasos machines Bug #717511 [partman-ext3] Bug#717511: partman-ext3: warn if bootable partition is not ext2 on Pegasos machines Changed Bug title to 'Bug#717511: partman-basicfilesystems: warn if bootable partition is not ext2 on Pegasos machines' from 'Bug#717511: partman-ext3: warn if bootable partition is not ext2 on Pegasos machines' > reassign 717511 partman-basicfilesystems Bug #717511 [partman-ext3] Bug#717511: partman-basicfilesystems: warn if bootable partition is not ext2 on Pegasos machines Bug reassigned from package 'partman-ext3' to 'partman-basicfilesystems'. No longer marked as found in versions partman-ext3/74. Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #717511 to the same values previously set > found 717511 partman-basicfilesystems/77 Bug #717511 [partman-basicfilesystems] Bug#717511: partman-basicfilesystems: warn if bootable partition is not ext2 on Pegasos machines Marked as found in versions partman-basicfilesystems/77. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 717511: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717511 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.137480578518941.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jul 26 00:07 buildd@barber build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jul 26 00:07 buildd@barber build_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_netboot-gtk.log * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jul 26 00:08 buildd@barber build_netboot-xen http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_netboot-xen.log * FAILED BUILD: i386 Jul 26 00:08 buildd@biber build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: i386 Jul 26 00:08 buildd@biber build_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_netboot-gtk.log * FAILED BUILD: i386 Jul 26 00:09 buildd@biber build_netboot-xen http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_netboot-xen.log * OLD BUILD:ia64 May 26 00:12 buildd@alkman build_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/ia64/daily/build_cdrom.log * OLD BUILD:ia64 May 26 00:16 buildd@alkman build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/ia64/daily/build_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 Jul 26 00:42 buildd@fano build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 Jul 26 00:44 buildd@fano build_netboot-9 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot-9.log * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 Jul 26 00:48 buildd@fano build_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot-gtk.log * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 Jul 26 00:51 buildd@fano build_netboot-gtk-9 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot-gtk-9.log * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-i386 Jul 26 00:33 buildd@finzi build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-i386/daily/build_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-i386 Jul 26 00:36 buildd@finzi build_netboot-9 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-i386/daily/build_netboot-9.log * FAILED BUILD: mips Jul 26 00:30 buildd@lucatelli build_malta_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_malta_netboot-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mips Jul 26 00:31 buildd@lucatelli build_r4k-ip22_cdrom-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_r4k-ip22_cdrom-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mips Jul 26 00:31 buildd@lucatelli build_r4k-ip22_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_r4k-ip22_netboot-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mips Jul 26 00:32 buildd@lucatelli build_r5k-ip32_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_r5k-ip32_netboot-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mips Jul 26 00:33 buildd@lucatelli build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mips Jul 26 00:33 buildd@lucatelli build_miniiso http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_miniiso.log * FAILED BUILD: powerpc Jul 26 00:03 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: powerpc Jul 26 00:03 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc_netboot-gtk.log * FAILED BUILD: powerpc Jul 26 00:06 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc64_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc64_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: powerpc Jul 26 00:06 buildd@praetorius build_powerpc64_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/powerpc/daily/build_powerpc64_netboot-gtk.log Totals: 127 builds (22 failed, 2 old) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1v2wo8-0005eo...@ravel.debian.org
Bug#717816: Support for "ads" in D-I (was: Bug#717816: userdevfs: includes device files)
Quoting Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org): > I've never even heard of an ADS board. Whatever it is, I think it's clear > that the support can be killed off now. Done. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#717792: debian-installer: locale warnings after clean installation in US English with Dutch timezone
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + unreproducible Bug #717792 [localechooser] Should generate secondary locales in some cases Added tag(s) unreproducible. -- 717792: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717792 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.b717792.137478302922955.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#717792: debian-installer: locale warnings after clean installation in US English with Dutch timezone
Samuel Thibault, le Thu 25 Jul 2013 22:10:21 +0200, a écrit : > Mmm, I couldn't achieve that. I have: > > - selected english > - selected netherlands > - selected the en_US.UTF-8 locale > - selected US keymap And yes, the Europe/Amsterdam timezone automatically got selected. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130725201155.gt5...@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr
Bug#717792: debian-installer: locale warnings after clean installation in US English with Dutch timezone
Control: tags -1 + unreproducible Christian PERRIER, le Thu 25 Jul 2013 18:39:30 +0200, a écrit : > > - US English language > > - Europe/Ansterdam timezone > > - US keymap > > > > Pretty common in The Netherlands. With these options, the locales are not > > correctly generated. > > Output of `locale`: > > > > LANG=en_US.UTF-8 > > LANGUAGE=en_US:en > > LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8" > > LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8" > > LC_TIME=nl_NL.utf8 > > LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8" > > LC_MONETARY="en_US.UTF-8" > > LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8" > > LC_PAPER="en_US.UTF-8" > > LC_NAME="en_US.UTF-8" > > LC_ADDRESS="en_US.UTF-8" > > LC_TELEPHONE="en_US.UTF-8" > > LC_MEASUREMENT="en_US.UTF-8" > > LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_US.UTF-8" > > LC_ALL= Mmm, I couldn't achieve that. I have: - selected english - selected netherlands - selected the en_US.UTF-8 locale - selected US keymap and used default values for the rest. The installed system has en_US.UTF-8 as locale: /etc/environment contains: # File generated by update-locale LANG="en_US.UTF-8" LANGUAGE="en_US:en" I don't see where LC_TIME=nl_NL.utf8 would come from. Are you sure you didn't modify your environment? Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130725201021.gq5...@type.youpi.perso.aquilenet.fr
Bug#717816: Support for "ads" in D-I (was: Bug#717816: userdevfs: includes device files)
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 08:32:03PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > I noticed that we still have, in D-I, a "userdevfs" package that is > meant to provide support for the deprecated devfs devicesfor > pre-2.6 kernels. > I was about to move it the D-I attic and request for this package (and > assoicated udebs) to be removed from the archiveuntil a last check > showed me that it is indeed used by armel D-I builds, namely in the > "ads.cfg" package list: > === > # Since no kernel is currently provided in Debian, provide userdevfs so > # a locally provided monlothic kernel without devfs/udev will work. > userdevfs > # The ADS kernels don't use udev yet, and won't have important devices if > # udev is included. > udev-udeb - > # pcmcia is on most of these boards, although it's more commonly used for > # compact flash reading / bootloader stuff than for networking > pcmciautils-udeb > === From the top of config/armel/ads.cfg: # FIXME: no kernel in Debian yet for ADS boards, users must provide their own. And there've only ever been two commits to this file, in 2008 and 2009. > So, is this only old cruft that should be cleaned out or is there a > reason for userdevfs to still exist? > > In short, is this "ADS" thing something considered obsolete and not > supported anymore or is it still supported? If so, is this userdevfs > really useful? I've never even heard of an ADS board. Whatever it is, I think it's clear that the support can be killed off now. -- Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world. Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/ slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org > > - Forwarded message from Christian PERRIER - > > Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:46:53 +0200 > From: Christian PERRIER > To: Ansgar Burchardt , 717...@bugs.debian.org > Subject: Bug#717816: userdevfs: includes device files > Reply-To: Christian PERRIER , 717...@bugs.debian.org > X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/174563 > X-CRM114-Status: Good ( pR: 999.99 ) > > Quoting Ansgar Burchardt (ans...@debian.org): > > Package: userdevfs > > Version: 0.17 > > > > userdevfs includes device files which makes dak's lintian check unhappy > > and violates Policy 10.6 (not sure how far this applies for udebs): > > > > On 07/25/2013 12:37, Cron Daemon wrote: > > > W: lintian failed for > > > /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/tmp/dakay42em/userdevfs_0.17_i386.changes > > > [return code: 2]. > > > W: [possible output:] /bin/tar: ./dev/ram0: Cannot mknod: Operation not > > > permitted > > > [possible output:] /bin/tar: ./dev/vc/2: Cannot mknod: Operation not > > > permitted > > [...] > > > [possible output:] /bin/tar: ./dev/tty: Cannot mknod: Operation not > > > permitted > > > [possible output:] /bin/tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous > > > errors > > > [possible output:] internal error: dpkg-deb | tar failed with status 2 > > > at /usr/share/lintian/collection/unpacked line 82 > > > [possible output:] warning: collect info unpacked about package > > > userdevfs failed > > > [possible output:] warning: skipping check of udeb package userdevfs > > > > As the package description mentions pre-2.6 kernels I'm also wondering > > if the package is still needed? > > > I wondered alsobut found out that the package is mentioned in at > least on pkg-list for armel builds. > > > > > > - End forwarded message - > > -- > > signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#717816: Support for "ads" in D-I (was: Bug#717816: userdevfs: includes device files)
Please notice that I know about nothing to arm/armel stuff so I may say stupid things. I noticed that we still have, in D-I, a "userdevfs" package that is meant to provide support for the deprecated devfs devicesfor pre-2.6 kernels. I was about to move it the D-I attic and request for this package (and assoicated udebs) to be removed from the archiveuntil a last check showed me that it is indeed used by armel D-I builds, namely in the "ads.cfg" package list: === # Since no kernel is currently provided in Debian, provide userdevfs so # a locally provided monlothic kernel without devfs/udev will work. userdevfs # The ADS kernels don't use udev yet, and won't have important devices if # udev is included. udev-udeb - # pcmcia is on most of these boards, although it's more commonly used for # compact flash reading / bootloader stuff than for networking pcmciautils-udeb === So, is this only old cruft that should be cleaned out or is there a reason for userdevfs to still exist? In short, is this "ADS" thing something considered obsolete and not supported anymore or is it still supported? If so, is this userdevfs really useful? - Forwarded message from Christian PERRIER - Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 18:46:53 +0200 From: Christian PERRIER To: Ansgar Burchardt , 717...@bugs.debian.org Subject: Bug#717816: userdevfs: includes device files Reply-To: Christian PERRIER , 717...@bugs.debian.org X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/174563 X-CRM114-Status: Good ( pR: 999.99 ) Quoting Ansgar Burchardt (ans...@debian.org): > Package: userdevfs > Version: 0.17 > > userdevfs includes device files which makes dak's lintian check unhappy > and violates Policy 10.6 (not sure how far this applies for udebs): > > On 07/25/2013 12:37, Cron Daemon wrote: > > W: lintian failed for > > /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/tmp/dakay42em/userdevfs_0.17_i386.changes > > [return code: 2]. > > W: [possible output:] /bin/tar: ./dev/ram0: Cannot mknod: Operation not > > permitted > > [possible output:] /bin/tar: ./dev/vc/2: Cannot mknod: Operation not > > permitted > [...] > > [possible output:] /bin/tar: ./dev/tty: Cannot mknod: Operation not > > permitted > > [possible output:] /bin/tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous > > errors > > [possible output:] internal error: dpkg-deb | tar failed with status 2 at > > /usr/share/lintian/collection/unpacked line 82 > > [possible output:] warning: collect info unpacked about package userdevfs > > failed > > [possible output:] warning: skipping check of udeb package userdevfs > > As the package description mentions pre-2.6 kernels I'm also wondering > if the package is still needed? I wondered alsobut found out that the package is mentioned in at least on pkg-list for armel builds. - End forwarded message - -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#717791: debian-installer: virtualbox guest additions not installed correctly
Quoting Sander Marechal (san...@prezent.nl): > Package: debian-installer > Severity: normal > Tags: d-i > > I installed a clean Debian Wheezy 7.1. The installer correctly determined > that it > was running in a Virtualbox VM and installed the virtualbox guest additions. > The > problem is that the additions were not correctly installed. The kernel module > wasn't > built so the guest additions did not work. > > I first had to install the build-essentials myself. Also, the installer > installed > the wrong kernel headers for my kernel. The debian installation came out > running the > -486 kernel but the installer installed the -686-pae kernel headers. > > IMHO if the debian installer installs the virtualbox guest additions, it > should also > build and load the kernel module. To be confirmed but I suspect this is not the installer that triggerred the installation of virtualbox extensions. I see nothing in tasksel's tasks that is related to virtualbox or virtualization. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#717816: userdevfs: includes device files
Quoting Ansgar Burchardt (ans...@debian.org): > Package: userdevfs > Version: 0.17 > > userdevfs includes device files which makes dak's lintian check unhappy > and violates Policy 10.6 (not sure how far this applies for udebs): > > On 07/25/2013 12:37, Cron Daemon wrote: > > W: lintian failed for > > /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/tmp/dakay42em/userdevfs_0.17_i386.changes > > [return code: 2]. > > W: [possible output:] /bin/tar: ./dev/ram0: Cannot mknod: Operation not > > permitted > > [possible output:] /bin/tar: ./dev/vc/2: Cannot mknod: Operation not > > permitted > [...] > > [possible output:] /bin/tar: ./dev/tty: Cannot mknod: Operation not > > permitted > > [possible output:] /bin/tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous > > errors > > [possible output:] internal error: dpkg-deb | tar failed with status 2 at > > /usr/share/lintian/collection/unpacked line 82 > > [possible output:] warning: collect info unpacked about package userdevfs > > failed > > [possible output:] warning: skipping check of udeb package userdevfs > > As the package description mentions pre-2.6 kernels I'm also wondering > if the package is still needed? I wondered alsobut found out that the package is mentioned in at least on pkg-list for armel builds. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processed: Re: Bug#717792: debian-installer: locale warnings after clean installation in US English with Dutch timezone
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 717792 localechooser Bug #717792 [debian-installer] debian-installer: locale warnings after clean installation in US English with Dutch timezone Bug reassigned from package 'debian-installer' to 'localechooser'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #717792 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed versions of bug #717792 to the same values previously set > retitle 717792 Should generate secondary locales in some cases Bug #717792 [localechooser] debian-installer: locale warnings after clean installation in US English with Dutch timezone Changed Bug title to 'Should generate secondary locales in some cases' from 'debian-installer: locale warnings after clean installation in US English with Dutch timezone' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 717792: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=717792 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/handler.s.c.137477038313215.transcr...@bugs.debian.org
Bug#717792: debian-installer: locale warnings after clean installation in US English with Dutch timezone
reassign 717792 localechooser retitle 717792 Should generate secondary locales in some cases thanks Quoting Sander Marechal (san...@prezent.nl): > Package: debian-installer > Severity: normal > Tags: d-i > > I installed a clean Debian Wheezy 7.1 using the following options: > > - US English language > - Europe/Ansterdam timezone > - US keymap > > Pretty common in The Netherlands. With these options, the locales are not > correctly generated. > Output of `locale`: > > LANG=en_US.UTF-8 > LANGUAGE=en_US:en > LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8" > LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8" > LC_TIME=nl_NL.utf8 > LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8" > LC_MONETARY="en_US.UTF-8" > LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8" > LC_PAPER="en_US.UTF-8" > LC_NAME="en_US.UTF-8" > LC_ADDRESS="en_US.UTF-8" > LC_TELEPHONE="en_US.UTF-8" > LC_MEASUREMENT="en_US.UTF-8" > LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_US.UTF-8" > LC_ALL= > > Everything is set to en_US, except for LC_TIME which is nl_NL. Problem is > that during installation > Debian doesn't actually generate the nl_NL locale. So, on every new machine I > always get perl warnings > about missing locales. I always have to run `dpkg-reconfigure locales` and > add nl_NL.UTF-8 myself. > > IMHO the installer should add this locale during the installation process. Indeed. That might be tricky to implement (the locale handling code in localechooser in quite fragile) but that's the correct diagnostic of the problem. Thanks for noticing and providing with a nice diagnostic. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Bug#637340: Thanks for applying, but still needs some work
Hi, Thanks Christian for applying this. Still, it needs some more work, as I tested it yesterday, and the Mini doesn't like the RAID1 format used by recent mdadm. It basically only recognize “raw” RAID1, where one can read either volume directly as a normal ext2/3 partition. See #504397 (the check.d/ext2_or_ext3 file references #509799 but this ought to be this other one). I'll submit another patch report if I find some solution. For now, if one doesn't use RAID, the current check *should* work. Regards, -- benjamin -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1374756955.2041.32.ca...@bcama-latitude.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr
Bug#717816: userdevfs: includes device files
Package: userdevfs Version: 0.17 userdevfs includes device files which makes dak's lintian check unhappy and violates Policy 10.6 (not sure how far this applies for udebs): On 07/25/2013 12:37, Cron Daemon wrote: > W: lintian failed for > /srv/ftp-master.debian.org/tmp/dakay42em/userdevfs_0.17_i386.changes [return > code: 2]. > W: [possible output:] /bin/tar: ./dev/ram0: Cannot mknod: Operation not > permitted > [possible output:] /bin/tar: ./dev/vc/2: Cannot mknod: Operation not > permitted [...] > [possible output:] /bin/tar: ./dev/tty: Cannot mknod: Operation not permitted > [possible output:] /bin/tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous > errors > [possible output:] internal error: dpkg-deb | tar failed with status 2 at > /usr/share/lintian/collection/unpacked line 82 > [possible output:] warning: collect info unpacked about package userdevfs > failed > [possible output:] warning: skipping check of udeb package userdevfs As the package description mentions pre-2.6 kernels I'm also wondering if the package is still needed? Ansgar -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51f11053.1030...@debian.org
partman-ext3_77_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:36:36 +0200 Source: partman-ext3 Binary: partman-ext3 Architecture: source all Version: 77 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Christian Perrier Description: partman-ext3 - Add to partman support for ext3 and ext4 (udeb) Closes: 637340 Changes: partman-ext3 (77) unstable; urgency=low . [ Milan Kupcevic ] * Check for ext[23] /boot on Linkstation Mini too. Thanks to Benjamin Cama. (Closes: #637340) Checksums-Sha1: 68caa6e55d1066786486280d276b821225cdf354 1612 partman-ext3_77.dsc 2e9f56b6901e64865e59e7768ae8cd7428510133 103437 partman-ext3_77.tar.gz 30fc058821499f0330a1183478b736eb445c8a71 84250 partman-ext3_77_all.udeb Checksums-Sha256: fe13672c3be25da90ae2746079c1bdb0dbdef4ed6761eab858e1219bc56c50af 1612 partman-ext3_77.dsc 2c4c675347ec12ba08deffde6dbf3e97670dcf18b1770e6f1b74a9ac409f0cda 103437 partman-ext3_77.tar.gz 0f6c2f1efee50f5528c5e4ba8e857b523eac78b35cfdcd7ff5a8b02575e333e9 84250 partman-ext3_77_all.udeb Files: ae08d2f611453dc440b59880796045ce 1612 debian-installer standard partman-ext3_77.dsc b7e3b4d7cd041eb0078c6d4b8367b3dc 103437 debian-installer standard partman-ext3_77.tar.gz fd3d1a9b1dc5e18a1693df86a18db3b3 84250 debian-installer standard partman-ext3_77_all.udeb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBUfDxbIcvcCxNbiWoAQIVSA/+OyXX0Fbm7ba9e/b0XvCHHtcJ6XPhOj6/ 2okB2lzewpRcOzlpazlKkZc/m0EfOFHaUmzI8hqVYAZaQsfmBZ9wOkOMxWsQrEwR +lEBdpir+tRZrlgx2GSwj/h6NsfYPu/7KkgruNee5MWqnm/P+1zjlVR8Ni2vzrJV UdM1NElyggFRaFRXbg3QQuHsvKHuPRsYD56t0vnQbqZ6WhP8HmAVqb7yEJ0elEuR Y3Z+c37Vk4P5zWIeKU1mV61SK8EyicBy9zt//psEPGypERPHmRJTw+I6+fIK+/cK zYL4IkHTFxbqkgrWO62Dem1ghVHhhPJPpY1dJlj8DrVUPCT+ojRbDJG559TbGVlD r1wRgGbVSZdHHepYeXXutMbpxE6n0TOthdAVdEeXtQ884Nq7F2uvo0fLi0Haeonb d12cIHhqzpzyN6TpUImsZZZscp140obF45mYTb4ryprhiFl+l8S3P5wujLNYJ9LK L2pyEHkX983wLEXQqF8GUzmR6MJagA+c8xx5UseTP+0AiGYkQLbw7ANNV6Jo8Ww7 FmTdC6j4eKrBFS81n36/nUQHu7X49ejjSZ1auM+tLwJK+4Zu/uM7VlUPPCRlsFWo +4xKIBiUQUmSmdHSWFxwrEhodFKHaQJunn2Tcb/mA/lAEbFMTRJryDy8cw0r/rZf UM9eOH/xNhE= =ylVs -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1v2ir6-0001j8...@franck.debian.org
userdevfs_0.17_i386.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 09:00:42 +0200 Source: userdevfs Binary: userdevfs Architecture: source all Version: 0.17 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Christian Perrier Description: userdevfs - user space devfs emulation for pre-2.6 kernels (udeb) Changes: userdevfs (0.17) unstable; urgency=low . [ Dmitrijs Ledkovs ] * Set debian source format to '3.0 (native)'. * Bump debhelper compat level to 9. * Set Vcs-* to canonical format. . [ Christian Perrier ] * Add myself to Uploaders Checksums-Sha1: 0e89a5a71ef1c1f8e19523ff5b4a1879d7313fd1 1602 userdevfs_0.17.dsc 1e5e65f6051dd9942247b5b8a420c50b8fc05899 4801 userdevfs_0.17.tar.gz e9f27d28a97d1067e983c3d833d4296e46ad194c 2580 userdevfs_0.17_all.udeb Checksums-Sha256: ee8de6a637d994ff596e6f9f5f36edc0466651d0b42b17f65e1da2f320c2bddb 1602 userdevfs_0.17.dsc b8fa948be0b26c9837dd564afd0789cd9489a64809afa63b187793ee5f79a765 4801 userdevfs_0.17.tar.gz 7d73b1c7bc69bef3714b29a5a83dd4bf0bd51554d1b39608bdb6024a2efbcadb 2580 userdevfs_0.17_all.udeb Files: bbf825244f1691a22c2653257969dd01 1602 debian-installer optional userdevfs_0.17.dsc 8b02b6a7818c953aa616a2bbc0eb79fa 4801 debian-installer optional userdevfs_0.17.tar.gz 98f210beb66787646c22130e2f53afb6 2580 debian-installer optional userdevfs_0.17_all.udeb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBUfD8DYcvcCxNbiWoAQKBVg/+MJF5Y6wRg1/BmihOTHoLl48y+ZWnFXvz Gf1MxaSwO3u9xy9SVEcDTMrscUr3S23ZIZfs1UBbwKDlAvGN/y912jlLc5NUDDPh W7Is+sEFX5vHdZIFPfjHYVNvIUvOFfELegQ8HX570wcBQNmiwDMmSPY3lmZ+l57o k/GEDitLWohHqVb6M8TKyGvzXzMWlct9ppUSkWj8EwIn+/6S3vmjy6qXuMw1kga6 bk2TjZ9KqrG05VGOiNta3Uk/ztMxbSEGZwjZRsJG4t73Ywz2zMpLekX7Ln1ViUHy qCBKAVRlcxWeocGLqyDDKmTswgx1nIp47vFclttUcgiQRG+asRVlpu0QYj7XNn3I h2Nohl2A2WOJugO62zIxrh+RhKR7nCtWGFbB3EgB913A9bcWoYxptbclYoA4AhFD Ogv8D7kL3I0LDXrAnAeVL/UdXhGxIjsdEJ8WH5Sc30BQOzO7lVk+JeObeelGbIaP zz2yaad2R9Z96Fs8071e3gNa8O9cSu1iyLxzgSHnR3xUx4EzKShEWUEX7rSu1oxP 27e+qDsomLgHzP5x6eq1OfUkGKgPtC1K40n4397/ouCbcg0IYwWbOZIJQkU7wuFv ElwRYr0bTx328wZVOKXAmI1fJUF6j9j6ArTueWMRlspg/mKT3kMaXKs0k5XYTb7K dMHXPF1XRWc= =YKmJ -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1v2irc-0001lb...@franck.debian.org
Processing of partman-ext3_77_i386.changes
partman-ext3_77_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: partman-ext3_77.dsc partman-ext3_77.tar.gz partman-ext3_77_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1v2ijv-0007gf...@franck.debian.org
Processing of userdevfs_0.17_i386.changes
userdevfs_0.17_i386.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: userdevfs_0.17.dsc userdevfs_0.17.tar.gz userdevfs_0.17_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1v2ijv-0007go...@franck.debian.org
Processing of partman-ext3_77_i386.changes
partman-ext3_77_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: partman-ext3_77.dsc partman-ext3_77.tar.gz partman-ext3_77_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1v2iil-0001as...@ravel.debian.org
Processing of userdevfs_0.17_i386.changes
userdevfs_0.17_i386.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: userdevfs_0.17.dsc userdevfs_0.17.tar.gz userdevfs_0.17_all.udeb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host ravel.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1v2iii-0001am...@ravel.debian.org
Bug#637340: marked as done (partman-ext3: check for ext[23] /boot on Linkstation Mini too)
Your message dated Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:33:08 + with message-id and subject line Bug#637340: fixed in partman-ext3 77 has caused the Debian Bug report #637340, regarding partman-ext3: check for ext[23] /boot on Linkstation Mini too to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 637340: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=637340 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --- Begin Message --- Package: partman-ext3 Version: 65 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch X-Debbugs-CC: Martin Michlmayr Hi, Attached is a patch to add a check for the Buffalo Linkstation Mini as it's being supported by d-i. Linkstation LiveV3 might also be included one day, but I can't test this as I don't have the hardware. Regards, benjamin diff --git a/check.d/ext2_or_ext3_boot b/check.d/ext2_or_ext3_boot index cde0de0..e32d795 100755 --- a/check.d/ext2_or_ext3_boot +++ b/check.d/ext2_or_ext3_boot @@ -8,7 +8,8 @@ case $ARCH in arm*) machine=$(grep "^Hardware" /proc/cpuinfo | sed 's/Hardware\s*:\s*//') || true case "$machine" in - "Buffalo Linkstation Pro/Live" | "Buffalo/Revogear Kurobox Pro") + "Buffalo Linkstation Pro/Live" | "Buffalo/Revogear Kurobox Pro" \ + | "Buffalo Linkstation Mini") ;; "GLAN Tank") ;; --- End Message --- --- Begin Message --- Source: partman-ext3 Source-Version: 77 We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of partman-ext3, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive. A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is attached. Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you have further comments please address them to 637...@bugs.debian.org, and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Christian Perrier (supplier of updated partman-ext3 package) (This message was generated automatically at their request; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org) -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Format: 1.8 Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2013 10:36:36 +0200 Source: partman-ext3 Binary: partman-ext3 Architecture: source all Version: 77 Distribution: unstable Urgency: low Maintainer: Debian Install System Team Changed-By: Christian Perrier Description: partman-ext3 - Add to partman support for ext3 and ext4 (udeb) Closes: 637340 Changes: partman-ext3 (77) unstable; urgency=low . [ Milan Kupcevic ] * Check for ext[23] /boot on Linkstation Mini too. Thanks to Benjamin Cama. (Closes: #637340) Checksums-Sha1: 68caa6e55d1066786486280d276b821225cdf354 1612 partman-ext3_77.dsc 2e9f56b6901e64865e59e7768ae8cd7428510133 103437 partman-ext3_77.tar.gz 30fc058821499f0330a1183478b736eb445c8a71 84250 partman-ext3_77_all.udeb Checksums-Sha256: fe13672c3be25da90ae2746079c1bdb0dbdef4ed6761eab858e1219bc56c50af 1612 partman-ext3_77.dsc 2c4c675347ec12ba08deffde6dbf3e97670dcf18b1770e6f1b74a9ac409f0cda 103437 partman-ext3_77.tar.gz 0f6c2f1efee50f5528c5e4ba8e857b523eac78b35cfdcd7ff5a8b02575e333e9 84250 partman-ext3_77_all.udeb Files: ae08d2f611453dc440b59880796045ce 1612 debian-installer standard partman-ext3_77.dsc b7e3b4d7cd041eb0078c6d4b8367b3dc 103437 debian-installer standard partman-ext3_77.tar.gz fd3d1a9b1dc5e18a1693df86a18db3b3 84250 debian-installer standard partman-ext3_77_all.udeb -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBUfDxbIcvcCxNbiWoAQIVSA/+OyXX0Fbm7ba9e/b0XvCHHtcJ6XPhOj6/ 2okB2lzewpRcOzlpazlKkZc/m0EfOFHaUmzI8hqVYAZaQsfmBZ9wOkOMxWsQrEwR +lEBdpir+tRZrlgx2GSwj/h6NsfYPu/7KkgruNee5MWqnm/P+1zjlVR8Ni2vzrJV UdM1NElyggFRaFRXbg3QQuHsvKHuPRsYD56t0vnQbqZ6WhP8HmAVqb7yEJ0elEuR Y3Z+c37Vk4P5zWIeKU1mV61SK8EyicBy9zt//psEPGypERPHmRJTw+I6+fIK+/cK zYL4IkHTFxbqkgrWO62Dem1ghVHhhPJPpY1dJlj8DrVUPCT+ojRbDJG559TbGVlD r1wRgGbVSZdHHepYeXXutMbpxE6n0TOthdAVdEeXtQ884Nq7F2uvo0fLi0Haeonb d12cIHhqzpzyN6TpUImsZZZscp140obF45mYTb4ryprhiFl+l8S3P5wujLNYJ9LK L2pyEHkX983wLEXQqF8GUzmR6MJagA+c8xx5UseTP+0AiGYkQLbw7ANNV6Jo8Ww7 FmTdC6j4eKrBFS81n36/nUQHu7X49ejjSZ1auM+tLwJK+4Zu/uM7VlUPPCRlsFWo +4xKIBiUQUmSmdHSWFxwrEhodFKHaQJunn2Tcb/mA/lAEbFMTRJryDy8cw0r/rZf UM9eOH/xNhE= =ylVs -END PGP SIGNATURE End Message ---
Bug#717792: debian-installer: locale warnings after clean installation in US English with Dutch timezone
Package: debian-installer Severity: normal Tags: d-i I installed a clean Debian Wheezy 7.1 using the following options: - US English language - Europe/Ansterdam timezone - US keymap Pretty common in The Netherlands. With these options, the locales are not correctly generated. Output of `locale`: LANG=en_US.UTF-8 LANGUAGE=en_US:en LC_CTYPE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_NUMERIC="en_US.UTF-8" LC_TIME=nl_NL.utf8 LC_COLLATE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MONETARY="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MESSAGES="en_US.UTF-8" LC_PAPER="en_US.UTF-8" LC_NAME="en_US.UTF-8" LC_ADDRESS="en_US.UTF-8" LC_TELEPHONE="en_US.UTF-8" LC_MEASUREMENT="en_US.UTF-8" LC_IDENTIFICATION="en_US.UTF-8" LC_ALL= Everything is set to en_US, except for LC_TIME which is nl_NL. Problem is that during installation Debian doesn't actually generate the nl_NL locale. So, on every new machine I always get perl warnings about missing locales. I always have to run `dpkg-reconfigure locales` and add nl_NL.UTF-8 myself. IMHO the installer should add this locale during the installation process. Kind regards, Sander Marechal -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.1 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-486 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130725071258.10501.94178.report...@nodejs.sebastian.nl
Bug#717791: debian-installer: virtualbox guest additions not installed correctly
Package: debian-installer Severity: normal Tags: d-i I installed a clean Debian Wheezy 7.1. The installer correctly determined that it was running in a Virtualbox VM and installed the virtualbox guest additions. The problem is that the additions were not correctly installed. The kernel module wasn't built so the guest additions did not work. I first had to install the build-essentials myself. Also, the installer installed the wrong kernel headers for my kernel. The debian installation came out running the -486 kernel but the installer installed the -686-pae kernel headers. IMHO if the debian installer installs the virtualbox guest additions, it should also build and load the kernel module. Kind regards, Sander Marechal -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.1 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-486 Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130725072020.10537.76913.report...@nodejs.sebastian.nl
