Processing of zipl-installer_0.0.26_source.changes
zipl-installer_0.0.26_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: zipl-installer_0.0.26.dsc zipl-installer_0.0.26.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zjfho-jp...@franck.debian.org
Processing of zipl-installer_0.0.26_source.changes
zipl-installer_0.0.26_source.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: zipl-installer_0.0.26.dsc zipl-installer_0.0.26.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zjfgh-0004dt...@coccia.debian.org
Processing of s390-dasd_0.0.31_source.changes
s390-dasd_0.0.31_source.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: s390-dasd_0.0.31.dsc s390-dasd_0.0.31.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zjgj4-0006qh...@coccia.debian.org
Processing of s390-netdevice_0.0.38_source.changes
s390-netdevice_0.0.38_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: s390-netdevice_0.0.38.dsc s390-netdevice_0.0.38.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zjgkp-00052d...@franck.debian.org
Processing of s390-dasd_0.0.31_source.changes
s390-dasd_0.0.31_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: s390-dasd_0.0.31.dsc s390-dasd_0.0.31.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host franck.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zjgkp-00052j...@franck.debian.org
Re: Proposal: Drop ttf-cjk-compact, get fonts-droid
Quoting Kenshi Muto (km...@debian.org): Step: 1. Modify fonts-android to provide fonts-android-udeb which has only DroidSansFallback.ttf. patch: http://kmuto.jp/debian/d-i-font/fonts-android.diff I'm working on this, right now. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
s390-netdevice_0.0.38_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 09:14:57 +0200 Source: s390-netdevice Binary: s390-netdevice Architecture: source Version: 0.0.38 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Description: s390-netdevice - Configure network hardware (udeb) Changes: s390-netdevice (0.0.38) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Updated translations ] * Portuguese (Brazil) (pt_BR.po) by Adriano Rafael Gomes * Turkish (tr.po) by Mert Dirik Checksums-Sha1: 69f6f5ab74e3533ac0f1835ec5090bd9ae668d8c 1788 s390-netdevice_0.0.38.dsc 7d3c975d93bd7475b172e4eac2b56c5f78677a81 108952 s390-netdevice_0.0.38.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: ff6f869f03830846200e042d71ecf5f8abf3c73d6eceeb265e2712e032e4d940 1788 s390-netdevice_0.0.38.dsc acdfc2744ca18cace3d61e6aef89f86af0c012dc2d7442bd8b10e382b4487428 108952 s390-netdevice_0.0.38.tar.xz Files: be0667822a4ab8408377eee4b7f7bdb3 1788 debian-installer standard s390-netdevice_0.0.38.dsc 06e190a05743d8dea1e2e384d97ee33c 108952 debian-installer standard s390-netdevice_0.0.38.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVtIo9AAoJEIcvcCxNbiWozXkP/0R+ZnbabQXFxaYoDFecZ6MG 3oOUpoSgQwOPp6qXsoAy6gpBhiHkg3VJHDXdMcwTJK3jhG3xoCSv9zMRnWM/l4Qf pfbc2m1ixR/AfT8xAADIgJKuWH7gCPA72BvhUAGwQEkP+PT26Il+Ohy8OYAsQzm3 6+6IWZaaziJGXk461LUHSFjubi3p3qt7JEfsgFmOlLSPZicRRuq6LXzxhYhMfEGT 1mLcYYLYNFM+IzyMTj8mKg8K3r36Yr2kOPNFoAseLYuVYEpI39cJFpJceUVdQQjc ZoYFBKD7yxpfPlE9OHClZKOmOuL2pTHTsGZInd1nmTGacVM28ZWI/6RvUn24WXpM ziQ6RuFIhrc0JuzWNbFltHL1vUut7Bec/6PUVsvT2o/R8QIShbkkgDTAXPqyMTqv 8xhO0pbML9/nWOA2V9AS5cMCrzR3qB0qUWevUAyb4hYxT3gj77cMbxY4Lbd7wMNz Thk1p/B4qANGqUeQp8vj3vewiadYBJCP6+B9iAGC0XwejINVZr92Yb7EqtvM/3aU qkrIYoxdtfw9QBaeoDDtAqV4bhZ5LIZkcsfYwkmyDJ6yWM63r2dfstEewordXyP3 Sbnu16tbZeKdkW6GrL0eBJiEgLR6NsnFng9vvl4TeVM7G47ZScBU9E5qlA6AT18n RV4By9txVcCVBKe+33+j =OdOH -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zjgrn-0005r4...@franck.debian.org
s390-dasd_0.0.31_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 09:15:33 +0200 Source: s390-dasd Binary: s390-dasd Architecture: source Version: 0.0.31 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Description: s390-dasd - Configure DASD (udeb) Changes: s390-dasd (0.0.31) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Updated translations ] * Turkish (tr.po) by Mert Dirik Checksums-Sha1: 05228b38b63f7533c8d045ae4b4919c4cedde7c9 1705 s390-dasd_0.0.31.dsc ab4020ba682afda2207aa17169d197cc2e48eef5 55332 s390-dasd_0.0.31.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 75b9cb11dd1f7e824f4d3255bd3d350edf9c4931cfbc903708d3f91bcdabe398 1705 s390-dasd_0.0.31.dsc 680125c3968d646f4e6cfa208c4ad4acd60f30b1128992eaa533230cf82936aa 55332 s390-dasd_0.0.31.tar.xz Files: d4a6c3a14e766b52161b69d4038eacae 1705 debian-installer standard s390-dasd_0.0.31.dsc 43769cec17405f1e39d29c8a2dbc67e2 55332 debian-installer standard s390-dasd_0.0.31.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVtIoqAAoJEIcvcCxNbiWotqYP/0NKE4syIgjXd9uXBHZjJUME D6E1B4AnKIN1dv3YudtrReLiRndVU4ePyEGuWFCZf9RKPU/4dFNCEaL8rrAp9Wh9 CBXsTe8BMdjTXQ9NGX6a/EycmvmsjGetQIYMnycWU380TWfTayJoLF3g8/zZT0/p 1LJA9IBOkot4WDL0CPZlAzrZ6nE8kuxuAnYIKjSaUmiAHZcLE3D/soEvWQJh49Rt fatsCT+j366lSK3jFtghNu55QuAoeqEUudo7nzMNYYjLSBmikqgPqdea7j2IfHYA Z8DsVIUsAJjPJvv8TMxI6JVJr83irhs+ubE+yIh9LxSHci4JavZDVMdOOgFwFb1g DhJkTciLcSROoqGbLCdr6nEbJu0OEtP8joNTQMBTtxFT89ospG1tJ9M+dWwSo8Mp xAp4ENWCKQwGIfkFWj9bgpx2TwufurIyUjsDW9UVwg1d8JMBoWksxoD3l+/3AlaL 0Yx9Gmx0u8lZkUDYBYcr2C8P6KG89dewZOSHtP4rkSbGzw0OeKH2XrATjvLxa3WQ iFOA7DnmTHdq2Y8JCfrfFfGm7tHQAqLhqBEnZnDJp/XBzoFvEG1brgv8/+Ut5gNe j3tw4rShmOqPfWDPPET1UlqendghuT4nBU9JLTuNIpWkWb8SmmqPvhbq1AQ+saZz SHPthVXfXBSoFWNzIMp5 =je1y -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zjgri-0005q2...@franck.debian.org
Bug#762054: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#762054: d-i.debian.org: investigate ttf-* vs. fonts-* for udebs?
Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org): Hi Fabian, Fabian Greffrath fab...@debian.org (2015-07-10): Hi Cyril, Am Freitag, den 10.07.2015, 04:07 +0200 schrieb Cyril Brulebois: fonts-dejavu and fonts-freefont maintainers, do you concur? This would post-alpha 1. speaking as an Uplaoder for both fonts-freefont and fonts-dejavu, I'd concur that it should be safe and even recommended to switch to the new font packages and use the new package naming scheme. Many thanks for the swift reply+confirmation! I had this mail lying around in my TODO list and nwo I'm mostly ready to give this a try. Guys, do you think we want to manage a transition for, say ttf-freefont-udeb-fonts-freefont-udeb (with transitional package, etc. as we did for the ttf-fonts transitions)or will we just replace the package (given that only the installer is using the udeb) ? -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Processing of s390-netdevice_0.0.38_source.changes
s390-netdevice_0.0.38_source.changes uploaded successfully to ftp-master.debian.org along with the files: s390-netdevice_0.0.38.dsc s390-netdevice_0.0.38.tar.xz Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host coccia.debian.org) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zjgj6-0006qt...@coccia.debian.org
Re: Proposal: Drop ttf-cjk-compact, get fonts-droid
On Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:26:02PM +0900, Kenshi Muto wrote: ... Cons: - increases +2MB for each graphical initrd. jessie-amd64/cdrom/gtk/initrd.gz: 25557641 - 281535694 Presumably there's a typo here -- this is a tenfold increase! hd-media/gtk/initrd.gz: 27747025 - 30340894 netboot/gtk/initrd.gz: 34425758 - 37539446 netboot/gtk/mini.iso: 49283072 - 52428800 - Some Japanese characters look bit funny. (I believe it is negligible for installer.) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150726120736.ga10...@topoi.pooq.com
proofreading the installation-guide
A month ago in #789604, Justin B Rye wrote: Hmm, well, I've never proofread the installation-guide as a whole. I ought to get round to doing that some time. I'm trying to work out where I'd start with this. I can see things that need fixing, but they fall into several different categories and I don't know if it makes sense to try to deal with all of them at once. * * * First, the deep-rooted termininological issues that I'd prefer to have sane answers for before I start fiddling with details: * why is there so little mention of BD media? It seems to me that we should almost never say CDs and DVDs; we should settle on a cover-term like optical media and always use that. The one time it does mention BD-ROMS it claims that it's going to use CD-ROMs as a cover-term... but then it doesn't. * D-I seems to have standardised on the term MD devices, expanding MD as Multidisk Device (what, so they're Multidisk Device devices?); but officially md stands for Multiple Device. Besides, if what we're talking about is in fact a software RAID array, why don't we just call it that? * is there any hope of getting rid of the crazy backwards jargon of low priority installs? When you ask for Expert mode, you aren't lowering the priority of the install (i.e. declaring it less urgent); you aren't even lowering the priority of the questions it asks. What you're doing is lowering the amount of filtering-by-priority applied to debconf prompts - or to put that another way, you're asking for a low *simplification* install. (Perhaps I should make these three separate bugreports?) * * * Second, questions specific to the installation-guide's docbook, which again it would be nice to have answers for before I start trying to produce patches. (In fact, maybe the answers are or should be in a README somewhere?) * Structure - some of the XML files seem to be unused relics, but it's hard to tell which... * tag questions - e.g.: command is used fairly consistently for executables (like grub), and classinfo for some reason marks Debian packages (like grub-pc), but what do we do with GRUB? * Should all titles be titlecase? Could we switch to sentencecase? * entity questions - when am I meant to say Debian and when is it debian;? This like many of these entities seems to have no obvious function other than to make the source harder to interpret... * The d-i; entity expands to debian-installer in bold verbatim lowercase. If that is in effect the brandname of the software project then presumably we shouldn't be talking about the d-i; - that ought to be the Debian installer. * * * Third, the various categories of routine maintenance: * Decobwebbing - all those examples of tiny IDE hard drives with ext3 file systems. * systemd-proofing - stuff about initscripts, /etc/inittab, eth0. * When do we say APT, when is it apt-get/aptitude/apt? * Non-native-English-speakerisms - the usual objectless allows and Teutonic respectivelies, plus one that's especially common in D-I: yes, CDs are (installation) media, but one CD isn't a medium. * All those references to dhcp and ram and ips. * All those OldWorld PowerMacs (canonically four words). * Standardi[sz]ation issues (mostly behaviour). * General phrasing upgrades (mostly to reduce repetition). * Optional-extra house style tweaks like adding Harvard commas. -- JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150726121518.ga14...@xibalba.demon.co.uk
Re: proofreading the installation-guide
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 01:15:18PM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote: * entity questions - when am I meant to say Debian and when is it debian;? This like many of these entities seems to have no obvious function other than to make the source harder to interpret... * The d-i; entity expands to debian-installer in bold verbatim lowercase. If that is in effect the brandname of the software project then presumably we shouldn't be talking about the d-i; - that ought to be the Debian installer. Presumably both of these parametrisations are for the convenience of Debian derivatives and forks. By making these macros, it's easier for the, and it'll be easier for us to merge downstream patches. -- hendrik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150726122637.gb10...@topoi.pooq.com
Re: Proposal: Drop ttf-cjk-compact, get fonts-droid
Quoting Kenshi Muto (km...@debian.org): 2. After fonts-android-udeb is installed to the mirror, Modify d-i/installer to use fonts-droid-udeb instead of ttf-cjk-compact-udeb. patch: http://kmuto.jp/debian/d-i-font/installer.diff New fonts-android uploaded. Now we need to wait for NEW processing. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Proposal: Drop ttf-cjk-compact, get fonts-droid
At Sun, 26 Jul 2015 08:07:36 -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: Cons: - increases +2MB for each graphical initrd. jessie-amd64/cdrom/gtk/initrd.gz: 25557641 - 281535694 Presumably there's a typo here -- this is a tenfold increase! oops, it was typo. - 28153694. Anyway thanks bubulle, for updating fonts-droid. Thanks, -- Kenshi Muto km...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150726135430.b82574921...@mail.topstudio.co.jp
zipl-installer_0.0.26_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Format: 1.8 Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:43:33 +0200 Source: zipl-installer Binary: zipl-installer Architecture: source Version: 0.0.26 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Debian Install System Team debian-boot@lists.debian.org Changed-By: Christian Perrier bubu...@debian.org Description: zipl-installer - Make DASD bootable (udeb) Changes: zipl-installer (0.0.26) unstable; urgency=medium . [ Updated translations ] * Turkish (tr.po) by Mert Dirik Checksums-Sha1: 5c1b1aa9b79042dc4be63e687802c064e34961f0 1690 zipl-installer_0.0.26.dsc 50b381474079fa6e2db8fdf8424215280e3fb4cf 21700 zipl-installer_0.0.26.tar.xz Checksums-Sha256: 03e0a77aec253105b5d8a9f15969929b9a440fadb09cbcf1dcc6df1ee71ded86 1690 zipl-installer_0.0.26.dsc 436ef95ed40dd10f27f032518d73968c891835cdbd85924bde337fb9abde3176 21700 zipl-installer_0.0.26.tar.xz Files: c2d9a320e1bc89fd7dc0e403908fd8b6 1690 debian-installer standard zipl-installer_0.0.26.dsc ee0143cd03581cc34211f5b5cd5fb151 21700 debian-installer standard zipl-installer_0.0.26.tar.xz -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVtIFkAAoJEIcvcCxNbiWowA4QAJlSNPXzkvNse4S/NUJBceFR dz5XhJrUiTsBvqxm3NFWifRs4Orjc8+jGDgKcBg12EZrMIMbiA2FWc5LkgLeFDFP 3fG6qf+I7YG9RiT/HEeyNS4rGMWh6t/u8a+jiX/Vv8vNlDg0HsHD45bbgS9YJg9p x8F83n7/aVD4+qzDAfLeER+Q+P5seTVgTMNrmnkKRaEgjINIejmSCzg1XQcnxCQz niHNtsHcEcgvp3/SOVpBqiUNuO9h1Q7ka/CskUftAIacPl+yDGcqubDku679M6cd TbnFbYtq74ZJ0zCmbUUybiasIslpdFrOYpR348TlMLwNBs2fPQsbur6UVOV0GW92 /sFhp2Q2DauRqG5oKSvY3F9uEYTUl+CUpoNQcguMMcXKUaRGGcgO/meFYQOG8x9f tbCfVcBMvSMwx1a8iJeDksHYRRDa8LEZ3kJV3qMK2PYL3fuW0qBDeI5BHgJIS5sU CQfBOROj0giQ4v8YWKG8NaEAkR2NXoasNrla4W2QGiJapidimejca+6f86PURx0k oKG3u8KUzNHbxGLbm2c1ZJj7kzoRicN2ltjztTS4tgmAO1mj7FoU1V6Hq7pUNEp2 sIQ3AlfXbfBWyPdiZN+//XZ03uXxMPO6CEf14rahvsghJQCer2OgOCw2jBynAOez k2Mbl5jLAP6ReWziFOOP =E1qE -END PGP SIGNATURE- Thank you for your contribution to Debian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/e1zjfjw-jm...@franck.debian.org
Re: Proposal: Drop ttf-cjk-compact, get fonts-droid
Hi, It's better than maitain ttf-cjk-compact for me at least. I'll work (add udeb) for it if you say go for it as a memeber of pkg-font-devel, so please add wishlist bug for package. -- Regards, Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.or.jp/org http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150726222601.a8476ca2302473518c13e...@debian.or.jp
Re: proofreading the installation-guide
Hendrik Boom wrote: Justin B Rye wrote: * entity questions - when am I meant to say Debian and when is it debian;? This like many of these entities seems to have no obvious function other than to make the source harder to interpret... * The d-i; entity expands to debian-installer in bold verbatim lowercase. If that is in effect the brandname of the software project then presumably we shouldn't be talking about the d-i; - that ought to be the Debian installer. Presumably both of these parametrisations are for the convenience of Debian derivatives and forks. By making these macros, it's easier for the, and it'll be easier for us to merge downstream patches. An interesting idea, but one that seems unlikely to work, especially given the way it's used in the text. For instance, there's a page welcome/what-is-debian-linux.xml, which is full of sentences like debian; was the first Linux distribution to include a package management system. And I can't see any particular pattern in when it's Debian installer, when it's debian; installer, and when it's d-i;. The debian-gnu; entity is effectively just shorthand for Debian GNU/arch-kernel; - confusing but handy. The architecture;, arch-title; and arch-kernel; entities are slightly oddly named but make sense as parametrisations, as do release; and releasename; as long as they're used for things that stay true for every release. (Oh, and I've just noticed there's a releasename-cap;, used instead of plain releasename; for no obvious reason in hardware/supported/arm.xml and nowhere else.) But there are also special entities for enterkey;, escapekey;, tabkey;, f10key;, and even ekey;! Most of these are only used once each - the rest of the time (and always for keys like F2 or space) it just uses keycap.../keycap. -- JBR with qualifications in linguistics, experience as a Debian sysadmin, and probably no clue about this particular package -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150726133745.ga19...@xibalba.demon.co.uk
Re: proofreading the installation-guide
On Sun, Jul 26, 2015 at 02:37:45PM +0100, Justin B Rye wrote: Hendrik Boom wrote: Justin B Rye wrote: * entity questions - when am I meant to say Debian and when is it debian;? This like many of these entities seems to have no obvious function other than to make the source harder to interpret... * The d-i; entity expands to debian-installer in bold verbatim lowercase. If that is in effect the brandname of the software project then presumably we shouldn't be talking about the d-i; - that ought to be the Debian installer. Presumably both of these parametrisations are for the convenience of Debian derivatives and forks. By making these macros, it's easier for the, and it'll be easier for us to merge downstream patches. An interesting idea, but one that seems unlikely to work, especially given the way it's used in the text. For instance, there's a page welcome/what-is-debian-linux.xml, which is full of sentences like debian; was the first Linux distribution to include a package management system. It makes me wonder whether this was originally the intention, but has become lost as generations of editors failed to follow up on it. -- hendrik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150726153548.ga12...@topoi.pooq.com
Re: Sparc removal
Quoting Joerg Jaspert (jo...@debian.org): Hi, following the last[1] announce, I just removed sparc from unstable experimental jessie-updates .../... As a consequence, should we keep sparc-only packages -I know about silo-installer at least) in trunk or should they be moved to the attic? The same stands for the installation guide specific parts as well. These things are not things I have followed closely over the years, though, so there may be good reasons to still keep Sparc-only components in our main tree. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
