Processed: your mail

2018-06-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 551838 +patch
Bug #551838 [debootstrap] Do not download packages with --unpack-tarball option
Added tag(s) patch.
> tags 877855 +patch
Bug #877855 [debootstrap] debootstrap does not carry --components across 
--foreign/--second-stage
Added tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
551838: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551838
877855: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=877855
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Bug#594052: debootstrap: create example /etc/hosts and /etc/fstab?

2018-06-04 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi,

On Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:18:45 +0200 Samuel Thibault  wrote:
> Colin Watson, le Mon 23 Aug 2010 12:45:12 +0100, a écrit :
> > Does anyone have any thoughts on this?
> 
> Mmm, aren't you actually looking for crosshurd? (which should really be
> called crossdebian nowadays). AIUI, using debootstrap is just meant for
> chroots & such.

 You mean, adding /etc/fstab sample is harm for hurd (or kfreebsd)?
 If so, how about if we can apply it for only linux?


-- 
Hideki Yamane 



Re: installation-guide is marked for autoremoval from testing

2018-06-04 Thread Holger Wansing
Hi,

Samuel Thibault  wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Holger Wansing, le dim. 13 mai 2018 19:51:50 +, a ecrit:
> > So let's go for an upload.
> > Samuel, maybe?
> 
> Uploaded now.

Great, thanks.

As expected, now the website displays the guide for Buster, what is wrong,
it should still display the guide for Stretch.
This is caused by the upload, which is the first upload for Buster.

I have fixed the guide release on the website in
https://salsa.debian.org/webmaster-team/cron/commit/f02a61c6d43c3b2f141ad64a837c33fbd0f56fb8

Waiting for the website rebuild, fingers crossed


Holger


-- 

Created with Sylpheed 3.5.1 under 
D E B I A N   L I N U X   9   " S T R E T C H " .

Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/




Re: [l10n-sync] Updating sync script on git migration

2018-06-04 Thread Christian PERRIER
Quoting Holger Wansing (li...@wansing-online.de):

> That would leave us with a gap on l10n uploads for d-i
> packages. 
> 
> So, maybe it's time for tuning my DD account to uploading DD:-)
> While being unsure, if that's doable for me, since I am not a
> programmer ...


I am not one either. I have a few skills at general script
programming, I can understand basic code and I have a few skills in
system administration.

Which was indeed enough for doing, I guess, quite decent job in
maintaining packages. The more important part is certainly having a
good knowledge of the Debian ecosystem, good knowledge of one's own
limits for technical work.and enough will to ask for help when
you're not confident in actions to take.




signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


di-netboot-assistant_0.53~bpo9+1_amd64.changes is NEW

2018-06-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters
binary:di-netboot-assistant is NEW.
binary:di-netboot-assistant is NEW.
source:di-netboot-assistant is NEW.

Your package has been put into the NEW queue, which requires manual action
from the ftpteam to process. The upload was otherwise valid (it had a good
OpenPGP signature and file hashes are valid), so please be patient.

Packages are routinely processed through to the archive, and do feel
free to browse the NEW queue[1].

If there is an issue with the upload, you will receive an email from a
member of the ftpteam.

If you have any questions, you may reply to this email.

[1]: https://ftp-master.debian.org/new.html
 or https://ftp-master.debian.org/backports-new.html for *-backports



Processing of di-netboot-assistant_0.53~bpo9+1_amd64.changes

2018-06-04 Thread Debian FTP Masters
di-netboot-assistant_0.53~bpo9+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to 
localhost
along with the files:
  di-netboot-assistant_0.53~bpo9+1.dsc
  di-netboot-assistant_0.53~bpo9+1.tar.xz
  di-netboot-assistant_0.53~bpo9+1_all.deb
  di-netboot-assistant_0.53~bpo9+1_amd64.buildinfo

Greetings,

Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org)



Processed: your mail

2018-06-04 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:

> tags 861343 -patch
Bug #861343 [debootstrap] debootstrap: hardcodes mawk as awk provider
Removed tag(s) patch.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.
-- 
861343: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=861343
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems



Re: [l10n-sync] Updating sync script on git migration

2018-06-04 Thread Holger Wansing

Hi,

Am Montag, 4. Juni 2018 schrieb Christian PERRIER:
> Quoting Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org):
> 
> > I think it would make sense to have you in the d-i gid, so that you can
> > access dillon, and re-enable crontab entries, maybe subscribing to cron
> > mails? Of course I could re-enable those crontab entries myself but I
> > won't be able to fix any possible fallouts in the upcoming days.
> > 
> > What do you think?

Yes, seems reasonable.
But since I'm only non-uploading DD, I don't have any  
experience in the relevant processes, which means I will be
asking for help sometimes :-) 
 
> And, as explained in private mail to Cyril, it would make sense to
> have me.out of the d-i gid, given my lowered activity nowadays
> (the swith to Salsa did ring the final bell, I think).
> 
> It also makes sense to drop my account from the installer team on
> Salsa (or whatever it is called there) whihch will save me from commit
> notifications...
> 
> Dropping me from Uploaders is also a good idea (I never found time to
> do that while we were still on Alioth).

Sadly hearing that...

That would leave us with a gap on l10n uploads for d-i
packages. 

So, maybe it's time for tuning my DD account to uploading DD:-)
While being unsure, if that's doable for me, since I am not a
programmer ...

So far 
Holger

-- 
Sent from my Jolla phone
http://www.jolla.com/

Re: Processed: Bug #551838 in debootstrap marked as pending

2018-06-04 Thread Hideki Yamane
Hi,

 I've prepared MergeRequest as
 https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debootstrap/merge_requests/8

> Make --unpack-tarball works properly (it means, just extract tarball and 
> configure it without any downloads)
> 
> 
> --unpack-tarball just exec "first_stage" and "second_stage" phase, ignore 
> "finddebs" and "dldebs"
> Some options overwrites phases info each other, so make them exclusive
> Save some package info to file to include to tarball made with --make-tarball

 Please review and merge it, thanks.


-- 
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane henrich @ debian.org/iijmio-mail.jp