Re: Re-planning for 12.6

2024-04-21 Thread Andy Simpkins



On 21/04/2024 01:57, Steve McIntyre wrote:

On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 05:41:13PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:

On Thu, Apr 18, 2024 at 10:58:41PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:

Hiya!

Not wanting to pester *too* much, but where are we up to?


Right now I can still have 27th April on the cards but we're missing FTP and
press. It's next week, we'd have to know this weekend and get frozen.
Mark indicated "maybe" and no answer from press.

If that date works please reply urgently otherwise we're looking into May
and possibly just skipping to line up with the final bullseye anyway.

It works for me, I guess. Dunno about other folks.



I can still do 27th but as I have already stated Isy is now unavailable 
until July due to exams.


Please can we make a decision by Tuesday otherwise I'll end up doing 
something else



/Andy



Re: Re-planning for 12.6

2024-04-01 Thread Andy Simpkins

On 01/04/2024 13:07, Adam D. Barratt wrote:

Hi,

As we had to postpone 12.6, let's look at alternative dates.

April 13th
- Not great for me for personal reasons, mhy previously said no. I
could probably do if need be

April 20th
- Doesn't work for me; I'm away from the Tuesday before until late on
the Friday

April 27th
- Doesn't work for me; I have a pre-existing appointment which means
I'll be AFK much of the day

May 4th
- Apparently doesn't work for me; long weekend in the UK

May 11th
- Should work for me

Regards,

Adam



Hi all,

May the 11th is fine for me.  Sorry we will not get an Isy as she will 
be deep into her exams by then. But we'll be ok, given this is just 12.6 
(and not a double release)



/Andy



Re: 11.3 and 10.12 planning

2022-03-08 Thread Andy Simpkins

On 07/03/2022 23:38, Steve McIntyre wrote:

On Sun, Mar 06, 2022 at 09:51:57PM +, Adam Barratt wrote:

Hi,

As you may have noticed, we're a bit overdue now for both 11.3 and the
penultimate buster point release, 10.12.

Some potential dates:

- March 19th (means freezing next weekend, so not ideal)
- March 26th
- April 2nd
- April 9th


The 19th is awkward for me (and Andy S!) - prior commitments. The
others look OK for me.



Hi Everyone,

I can do the 26th March or the 9th of April.
Sorry the 2nd April is not available for me either

BR

/Andy



Re: 11.2 planning

2021-11-23 Thread Andy Simpkins

On 23/11/2021 20:18, Steve McIntyre wrote:

Hey Adam!

On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 08:12:11PM +, Adam Barratt wrote:


It's (a little past) time that we organised the next point release. As
an "every other" release, this time will only be for stable.

Any of the first three weekends of December would work for me, although
the 4th is my least preferred as it means freezing over the coming
weekend and I'm not sure if I'll have time to do a fair job of dealing
with things before that.

tl;dr, suggested dates:

December 4th [least preferable for me]
December 11th
December 18th


4th December is a no-go for me, but the 11th and 18th look OK.



Likewise 11th & 18th December are good for us (can't do 4th either)

/Andy & Isy



Re: 11.1 and 10.11 planning

2021-09-06 Thread Andy Simpkins

On 06/09/2021 12:58, Cyril Brulebois wrote:

Hi Adam,

Adam D. Barratt  (2021-09-06):

We've ended up being late with planning 10.11 due to the timing of the
bullseye release, and also need to look at getting 11.1 sorted.

Traditionally, we've combined stable and oldstable point releases (at
2- and 4-month cadences) while both are supported. That would still be
my preference, but I understand that not everyone on the Images side
is so keen on the idea. Open questions in addition to dates are
therefore whether we should do 10.11 and 11.1 on the same day and, if
not, how close together they should be.

A few suggested dates to get things going:

September 18th - not great; means freezing this coming weekend
September 25th - not great; I'm away during most of the week
beforehand, so will be unlikely to be able to deal with any issues,
make sure everything's ready, etc.
October 2nd - OK for me
October 9th - OK for me
October 16th - OK for me


Regarding d-i preps, I should be able to accomodate anything that gets
picked up.


Cheers,




I can do all of the above dates except the 2nd October (wedding anniversary)

Whilst it is normal to run a point release on old stable at the same 
time as stable it does mean that we don't give the images in the old 
stable point release as much testing as perhaps they should because we 
are all 'too tired' by the time that we get round to them.  that said 
that is what the Sunday is for...


/Andy



Re: Finding a tentative bullseye release date

2021-07-18 Thread Andy Simpkins



On 18/07/2021 00:24, Donald Norwood wrote:

Hi!

On 7/17/21 4:58 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:

On Sat, Jul 17, 2021 at 10:25:17PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:

Hi all,

On 11-07-2021 21:11, Paul Gevers wrote:

With less than three weeks to go until the tentative release date, I
would love to confirm the date by now, but there is a serious issue with
crucial infrastructure (cdbuilder.d.o). Apart from this issue (and what
it means for solving the debian-installer blocking issues in time), I'm
not aware of other blocking issues, so let's hope the teams involved can
recover in time.

Albeit there is some progress, we think it better for the people
involved to now say that we will *not* release on July 31.

Unfortunately, that means that we have to start looking for a new date
again. Assuming what we'll learn in the upcoming week or two is good, I
propose to already start the list below with two weeks after the
previous date. Upcoming time is around DebConf, I can imagine it could
even be an advantage, especially as that's on-line, let's see.

14 August (day before DebCamp)

Doable.

Works for me

Works for me for images team


21 August (last day of DebCamp)
RT: elbrus

Awkward - wife has plans for us that evening.

Half of the press team is available this day so it is not ideal.

Sorry - away

28 August (DebConf)
RT: elbrus

Debian UK BBQ, argh

away at ^^



4 September
RT: elbrus

Labor day weekend in the U.S. Not a good weekend.

Works fine for me

doable - Isy and I will be unavailable before 1300hrs UTC

11 September:
RT: elbrus

That's the week of my wedding anniversary, I'll be on VAC.

Happy Anniversary!

Works for me


Could we put forth September 18th? We are good for that day without any
issues.

Works for me



Bug#989619: task-kde-desktop: Wrong wallpaper installed on clean installation of Bullseye (Desktop & Lock)

2021-06-08 Thread Andy Simpkins
Package: task-kde-desktop
Version: 3.67
Severity: important

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where
appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
   Testing Weekly builds of DI ready for release  (build 2021-06-07)
   
  * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
   ineffective)?
   Clean installation into seporate VMs of all installation
media.  Only
KDE desktop is affected.  All other desktops correctly install and
select the 'Homeworld' wallpaper and lock screens.


   * What was the outcome of this action?
   KDE desktopinstallation had 'shell' as default walpaper and as
   'lockscreen'
   
  * What outcome did you expect instead?
  I expected to see 'Homeworld' as the default wallpaper and lock
screen
- it wasn't 'shell' was set as the default.
Homeworld was installed, just not as the active setting
Login screen correctly showed 'homeworld'


I beleive that this would be an embarissment if we fail to correctly
theme the default desktop on KDE by bullseye release.
Note I have also tested GNOME, XFCE, Gnome FlashBack, Cinnamon, Mate,
LXQt, LXDE all sucessfully.

/RattusRattus

*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***



Re: 10.10 planning

2021-06-01 Thread Andy Simpkins
Isy and I can do 12th or 19th.   

We have a prior commitment on the 26th...  Sorry

/Andy (rattusrattus)

On 30 May 2021 17:41:54 BST, "Adam D. Barratt"  wrote:
>Hi,
>
>We're now a little overdue for 10.10, but it looks like we're ready in
>terms of shim etc. changes, so we should look at dates.
>
>Please could you indicate your availability for (and any preferences
>amongst) the following:
>
>Saturday June 12th
>Saturday June 19th
>Saturday June 26th
>
>The 12th is doable, but means we have to freeze next weekend; on that
>basis I have a personal preference for the 19th, although I realise
>that it's further out of cadence.
>
>Thanks,
>
>Adam

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: 10.9 planning

2021-03-15 Thread Andy Simpkins
Preferance would be 27th
But can do the others if need be.

/Andy (& Isy)

On 15 March 2021 20:54:45 GMT, Laura Arjona Reina  wrote:
>Hi!
>
>El 15 de marzo de 2021 13:33:15 CET, "Adam D. Barratt"
> escribió:
>>Hi,
>>
>>It's that time again, when we should look at organising the next point
>>release.
>>
>>Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
>>the following:
>>
>>- March 27th
>>- April 3rd
>>- April 10th
>>
>
>All those dates work for publicity team.
>
>Kind regards,
>
>>I'd prefer to avoid April 10th if possible, for slightly selfish
>>reasons. :-)
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>>Adam
>>
>
>-- 
>Laura Arjona Reina
>https://wiki.debian.org/LauraArjona
>Sent with K-9 mail

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: 10.8 planning

2021-01-17 Thread Andy Simpkins
I can do either, it's not like I can go anywhere either weekend :-)

Isy is available to help as well.

/Andy

On 16 January 2021 21:54:25 GMT, Cyril Brulebois  wrote:
>Adam D. Barratt  (2021-01-16):
>> Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
>> the following:
>> 
>> - January 30th (would mean we would have to freeze next weekend, so
>>   a bit tight)
>> - February 6th
>> 
>> My personal preference would be the 6th.
>
>Me too. But I can do both if needs be.
>
>
>Cheers,
>-- 
>Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)
>D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: 10.7 planning

2020-10-31 Thread Andy Simpkins
Isy and I can do any of these dates.  
We'll keep the dates clear until you announce the point release.

Cheers

On 30 October 2020 19:10:20 GMT, "Adam D. Barratt"  
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>In an attempt to be slightly more efficient than usual at planning a
>point release... it's about a month since 10.6, so let's start looking
>at dates for 10.7.
>
>Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
>the following:
>
>- November 21st
>- November 28th
>- December 5th
>
>Thanks,
>
>Adam

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: 10.6 planning

2020-09-09 Thread Andy Simpkins
I can do either and have no preferance.
/Andy



On 9 September 2020 19:24:06 BST, "Adam D. Barratt"  
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>We're slightly off our previous schedule because of delaying 10.5, but
>we should really get on with arranging 10.6.
>
>Please could you confirm your availability, and any preferences, for
>the following:
>
>- September 26/27
>- October 3/4
>
>Thanks,
>
>Adam

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: stretch EOL point release (9.13) and 10.5 planning

2020-07-18 Thread Andy Simpkins


On 18 July 2020 22:39:05 BST, Steve McIntyre  wrote:
>On Sat, Jul 18, 2020 at 10:12:41PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote:
>>On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 15:35 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>>> Hi Steve,
>>> 
>>> On Sun, 2020-07-12 at 12:46 +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote:
>>> > Argh, massive apologies...
>>> > 
>>> > On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 10:38:14AM +0200, Laura Arjona Reina
>wrote:
>>> > > El 15/6/20 a las 18:44, Adam D. Barratt escribió:
>>> > > > - July 18/19
>>> > 
>>> > Massive apologies for dropping a spanner in the works, but
>>> > something major has come up. I won't be able to do *all* of that
>>> > weekend after all. As Stretch EOL is already a thing, can I
>suggest
>>> > that we keep that to plan and push back the Buster 10.5 release a
>>> > little?
>>> > 
>>> > Sorry. :-/
>>> 
>>> Thanks for letting us know. :-(
>>> 
>>> I'll drop a note to the lists, and we can look at getting a new date
>>> organised.
>>
>>Now that stretch EoL is (more or less) out of the way, it would be
>good
>>to get 10.5 done as soon as we sensibly can, so as not to slip too far
>>off schedule.
>>
>>Next weekend is probably a little too soon - I'd at least like to not
>>jump straight back into freezing - but how about one of:
>>
>>- August 1st/2nd
>>- August 8th/9th
>
>Either is possible for me, with a preference for the first. Let's not
>delay too long if possible.
>
>Cheers,
>
>Steve
>
>-- 
>Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.   
>st...@einval.com
>  Armed with "Valor": "Centurion" represents quality of Discipline,
>  Honor, Integrity and Loyalty. Now you don't have to be a Caesar to
>  concord the digital world while feeling safe and proud.

-- 
I am good for either weekend.
Given a preferance i would prefer the 1st.  

Cheers
/Andy
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: stretch EOL point release (9.13) and 10.5 planning

2020-06-15 Thread Andy Simpkins
On 15/06/20 19:05, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Adam D. Barratt  (2020-06-15):
>> To get the ball rolling, please could you confirm your availability
>> for:
>>
>> - July 11/12
>> - July 18/19
> 
> 
> Anyway, I should be available, whatever date(s) get picked.
> 
Preferance would be the weekend of the 18/19 for Isy and me (we have
plans for the weekend before).

/Andy




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: Planning 10.3 and 9.12

2020-01-07 Thread Andy Simpkins
I can do any of these.  Probably best avoid FOSDEM though.

/Andy

On 6 January 2020 21:42:29 GMT, "Adam D. Barratt"  
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>It's (really past) time to consider a date for the next point releases
>for buster and stretch.
>
>I've listed some suggested dates below; please indicate which you would
>be available for.
>
>- January 25th
>- February 1st
>- February 8th
>- February 15th
>
>Thanks,
>
>Adam

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: Scheduling 10.1 and maybe 9.10

2019-07-29 Thread Andy Simpkins
Ok I'll mark it on family calendar 

On 29 July 2019 10:47:09 GMT-03:00, Jonathan Wiltshire  wrote:
>Ok, we have a winner. Let's make them both 7th September so press
>aren't
>under too much pressure.
>
>-- 
>Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
>Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
>
>4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: Scheduling 10.1 and maybe 9.10

2019-07-20 Thread Andy Simpkins
Either wfm thanks

On 21 July 2019 00:36:30 BST, Jonathan Wiltshire  wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 07:35:01PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>>  - August 24th
>
>I have no idea how I missed the event that weekend...
>
>>  - Auguest 31st
>>  - September 7th
>
>These look like the two options so far. Any other takers?
>
>> We also have a point release of 9.10 to fit in some time - would the
>same
>> day or adjacent weekends be preferable?
>
>Consensus seems to be to do them together.
>
>
>
>-- 
>Jonathan Wiltshire  j...@debian.org
>Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw
>
>4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

-- 
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Bug#911036: reproducing bug / testing

2019-03-09 Thread Andy Simpkins
Confirmed in DI daily build debian-testing-amd64-netinst.iso dated
2019-03-09 11:14

About to test with your patch at
https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/partman-lvm/merge_requests/2

(waiting for build)

/Andy



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Bug#775069: installation-reports: Sucessful install Jessie-DI-rc1-amd64-netinst

2015-01-10 Thread Andy Simpkins
Package: installation-reports
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?
install test
   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
 ineffective)?
installed from USB stick onto bare PC 
   * What was the outcome of this action?
Sucess
   * What outcome did you expect instead?
Sucess 
*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***


-- Package-specific info:

Boot method: usb stick
Image version: 
cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/.jessie_di_rc1/amd64/iso-cd/debian-Jessie-DI-rc1-amd64-netinst.iso
Date: 

Machine: scan 3XS - i7 4790 cpu | asus Z97-P mobo | 16GB RAM | XFC R9-280X GPU 
(twin DP displays)
Partitions: 


Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:   [o ]
Detect network card:[o ]
Configure network:  [o ]
Detect CD:  [ ]
Load installer modules: [o ]
Clock/timezone setup:   [o ]
User/password setup:[o ]
Detect hard drives: [o ]
Partition hard drives:  [o ]
Install base system:[o ]
Install tasks:  [o ]
Install boot loader:[o ]
Overall install:[o ]

Comments/Problems:

It is Debian - It Just works (tm)

Minor wobble at detect hw stage - DI reported that firmware for NIC was missing 
(rtl_nic/rtl8168g-2.fw) but after ignooring the error everything just worked
perhaps if the NIC is working you shouldn't report an error message (first time 
installers may just give up at that point)

I Like the fact I can now select the X desktop environment(s) I want to install 
from a list  about time too!  Well done :-)

Thank you.

-- 

Please make sure that the hardware-summary log file, and any other
installation logs that you think would be useful are attached to this
report. Please compress large files using gzip.

Once you have filled out this report, mail it to sub...@bugs.debian.org.

==
Installer lsb-release:
==
DISTRIB_ID=Debian
DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Debian GNU/Linux installer"
DISTRIB_RELEASE="8 (jessie) - installer build 20150107"
X_INSTALLATION_MEDIUM=cdrom

==
Installer hardware-summary:
==
uname -a: Linux RattusTest 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.16.7-ckt2-1 
(2014-12-08) x86_64 GNU/Linux
lspci -knn: 00:00.0 Host bridge [0600]: Intel Corporation 4th Gen Core 
Processor DRAM Controller [8086:0c00] (rev 06)
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:8534]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: hsw_uncore
lspci -knn: 00:01.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation Xeon E3-1200 v3/4th 
Gen Core Processor PCI Express x16 Controller [8086:0c01] (rev 06)
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport
lspci -knn: 00:14.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 9 Series Chipset 
Family USB xHCI Controller [8086:8cb1]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:8534]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: xhci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:16.0 Communication controller [0780]: Intel Corporation 9 Series 
Chipset Family ME Interface #1 [8086:8cba]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:8534]
lspci -knn: 00:1a.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 9 Series Chipset 
Family USB EHCI Controller #2 [8086:8cad]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:8534]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci-pci
lspci -knn: 00:1b.0 Audio device [0403]: Intel Corporation 9 Series Chipset 
Family HD Audio Controller [8086:8ca0]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:8615]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: snd_hda_intel
lspci -knn: 00:1c.0 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 9 Series Chipset 
Family PCI Express Root Port 1 [8086:8c90] (rev d0)
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport
lspci -knn: 00:1c.2 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 9 Series Chipset 
Family PCI Express Root Port 3 [8086:8c94] (rev d0)
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: pcieport
lspci -knn: 00:1c.3 PCI bridge [0604]: Intel Corporation 82801 PCI Bridge 
[8086:244e] (rev d0)
lspci -knn: 00:1d.0 USB controller [0c03]: Intel Corporation 9 Series Chipset 
Family USB EHCI Controller #1 [8086:8ca6]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:8534]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci-pci
lspci -knn: 00:1f.0 ISA bridge [0601]: Intel Corporation 9 Series Chipset 
Family Z97 LPC Controller [8086:8cc4]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:8534]
lspci -knn: 00:1f.2 SATA controller [0106]: Intel Corporation 9 Series Chipset 
Family SATA Controller [AHCI Mode] [8086:8c82]
lspci -knn: Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device [1043:8534]
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ahci
lspci -knn: 00:1f.3 SMBus [0c05]: Intel Corporation 9 Series Chipset Family 
SMBus Contro