Re: Capturing install screenshots

2001-11-03 Thread Matthew Sackman

On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 04:49:15PM -0700, Nicolas Lopez wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 06:03:12PM -0500, Robb Kidd wrote:
> > Carpenter, Dean wrote:
> > [ponder] Download the VMware 3.0 beta and install Debian in a virtual 
> > machine?  In addition to the many X screen grabbers available, VMware 
> > provides its own screen-capture function.
>   Or much better: Use plex86 or bochs.  That'll at least get you the x86 &
> common screens. MOL might help with PPC/PMac specific parts. 
>   Or.. Is there any reason why dbootstrap can't be run on a running system?
> Just chroot the install initrd image and run it directly.  I might have to
> play with that tonight. I'll see if I can catch the ritual goat sacrifice
> mentioned in my sig.

I've done this before (not the ritual goat sacrifice - running
dbootstrap on a live system). You just chroot it as normal. Get the
install disks, work out which disk contains the binaries, and hunt
around until you actually find the one that launches the install
sequence - if you do it from an xterm then you can snapshot as much as
you need.

HTH,

Matthew

-- 

Matthew Sackman
Nottingham,
ENGLAND

-
The contents of this email are intended for the indicated recipient(s)
only. This may or may not be indicated in the above email as it is
enormously easy to fake email addresses (see the relevant RFCs).

For security reasons this email is likely to be gnupg signed. On the
other hand it may not be if I forgot to do so. In any case, if you
are reading this on a Windows based computer then there was no point
in me doing so (provided that I remembered) as your computer is most
likely being used by yourself and 2.8 other people at the same time
(normally without your consent).

No responsibility will be accepted by anyone for any of the contents
of this email. So tough. If in doubt, go compile Mozilla.


 PGP signature


Re: boot floppies drivers disk(s)

2001-09-16 Thread Matthew Sackman

On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 03:35:13PM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 11:55:23AM +0100, Matthew Sackman wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 03:42:33AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> > > 
> > > the split images are in a special format, use the floppy_split utilty
> > > built during the b-f build process.
> > 
> > The tar.gz of my modules is small enough to put on a single disk. Should
> > I use the floppy_split utility even so to make it into the correct
> > format?
> 
> yes i think so, there is certain metadata dbootstrap seems to want.

Thank you very much for your help - it seems to have worked perfectly.

Cheers,

Matthew

-- 

Matthew Sackman
Nottingham,
ENGLAND

Using Debian/GNU Linux
Enjoying computing

It said 'Required Windows XP or better.'
So I installed Linux.

 PGP signature


Re: boot floppies drivers disk(s)

2001-09-15 Thread Matthew Sackman

On Sat, Sep 15, 2001 at 03:42:33AM -0800, Ethan Benson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 11:20:50PM +0100, Matthew Sackman wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> > 
> > I'm customising the bootfloppies 3.0.13 1.44 images for my own installation
> > and have replaced the kernel on the rescue disk without problems.
> > 
> > I'm also now trying to change the contents of the drivers disk. The
> > installation guide says that the drivers disk is a tar.gz of 
> > lib/modules/[kernel-version]. This is fine, but does the drivers disk have
> 
> not quite, thats part of it, but theres more to it then that and a
> simple tarball of /lib/modules won't work with b-f.
> 
> > an FS of it's own, or should I copy the tar.gz of the modules directly
> > to the disk with a dd command?
> 
> the split images are in a special format, use the floppy_split utilty
> built during the b-f build process.

The tar.gz of my modules is small enough to put on a single disk. Should
I use the floppy_split utility even so to make it into the correct
format?

Thanks,

Matthew

-- 

Matthew Sackman
Nottingham,
ENGLAND

Using Debian/GNU Linux
Enjoying computing

It said 'Required Windows XP or better.'
So I installed Linux.

 PGP signature


boot floppies drivers disk(s)

2001-09-15 Thread Matthew Sackman

Hi Guys,

I'm customising the bootfloppies 3.0.13 1.44 images for my own installation
and have replaced the kernel on the rescue disk without problems.

I'm also now trying to change the contents of the drivers disk. The
installation guide says that the drivers disk is a tar.gz of 
lib/modules/[kernel-version]. This is fine, but does the drivers disk have
an FS of it's own, or should I copy the tar.gz of the modules directly
to the disk with a dd command?

Thank you in advance, and my apologies if this is not quite the right
mailing list.

Matthew

-- 

Matthew Sackman
Nottingham,
ENGLAND

Using Debian/GNU Linux
Enjoying computing

It said 'Required Windows XP or better.'
So I installed Linux.

 PGP signature


Re: boot disks 2.3.5

2001-06-15 Thread Matthew Sackman

Many thanks for this - it rather solves the problem. In which case, what is the
'Preload modules' option for? - the menu description page in the install
program didn't seem to make it very clear.

With thanks,

Matthew

On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 04:52:22PM -0500, Stephen R Marenka wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2001 at 10:00:28PM +0100, Matthew Sackman wrote:
> 
> > However, one thing comes to mind: if one is installing to, say, a hardware RAID
> > array, which appears to linux as a single SCSI drive, but requires a module
> > loading, then how do you do it? The 'Preload module' option seemed promising,
> > but didn't seem to do what I was after.
> > 
> > What would be the steps required: use the install floppies to create a new root
> > floppy which contains the module required marked to be loaded, and then go into
> > the install sequence? If so, then how does one achieve this?
> 
> The full-up method can be found here:
> 
> 
>http://www.debian.org/releases/stable/i386/ch-boot-floppy-techinfo.en.html#s-rescue-replace-kernel
> 
> -- 
> Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right!
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>



-- 

Matthew Sackman
Nottingham,
ENGLAND

Using Debian/GNU Linux
Enjoying computing

It said 'Required Windows XP or better.'
So I installed Linux.

 PGP signature


boot disks 2.3.5

2001-06-15 Thread Matthew Sackman

Hi there,

May I firstly say how happy I am with the new boot disks - although I don't
have to floppy disks to be able to do a full install, what I have tested seems
to work very well indeed, and adds a number of very useful features over the
potato install disks.

However, one thing comes to mind: if one is installing to, say, a hardware RAID
array, which appears to linux as a single SCSI drive, but requires a module
loading, then how do you do it? The 'Preload module' option seemed promising,
but didn't seem to do what I was after.

What would be the steps required: use the install floppies to create a new root
floppy which contains the module required marked to be loaded, and then go into
the install sequence? If so, then how does one achieve this?

Many thanks for your time - as I said, things are looking very good indeed.

Matthew

-- 

Matthew Sackman
Nottingham,
ENGLAND

Using Debian/GNU Linux
Enjoying computing

It said 'Required Windows XP or better.'
So I installed Linux.

 PGP signature