Bug is fixed indeed, but beta3 treats s-ata as ide, which makes
upgrading to kernel 2.6 (unnecessarily) harder. 2.6 recognizes sata as
scsi-device. Same does the libata-patch for 2.4, which I mentioned in
the original bug report. Other things like raid-configurations are also
affected.
Should I file a new bug report against installer or should
kernel-image-2.6 take care for the correct conversion from ide to
pseudo-scsi (and the bug filed against kernel-image). It should be
easier to handle this problem in the installer-kernel, I guess. Are
there any good reasons that it's ide not scsi (libata)?
Bye,
Oliver
Debian Bug Tracking System schrieb:
This is an automatic notification regarding your Bug report
#220198: installation: proper sata support needed,
which was filed against the installation package.
It has been closed by one of the developers, namely
Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is
unsatisfactory and you have not received a better one in a separate
message then please contact the developer, by replying to this email.
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
Received: (at 217270-done) by bugs.debian.org; 23 Mar 2004 19:51:55 +
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 23 11:51:55 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from kitenet.net [64.62.161.42] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B5rwJ-0004Xx-00; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 11:51:55 -0800
Received: from dragon.kitenet.net (216-98-95-58.access.naxs.com [216.98.95.58])
(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client CN "Joey Hess", Issuer "Joey Hess" (verified OK))
by kitenet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D37CB17E8D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 19:51:49 + (GMT)
Received: by dragon.kitenet.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id B54546E714; Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:50:40 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2004 14:50:40 -0500
From: Joey Hess <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_12
X-Spam-Level:
--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User reported fixed pre-beta3.
--=20
see shy jo
--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFAYJUQd8HHehbQuO8RAp2WAJ9CFw6BoG1rfJ0Dyioy+5Cb9IwyiwCfZoaU
W+fM/+ZG1Qxom4QMcs0NpNY=
=iQBH
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--ikeVEW9yuYc//A+q--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
