Re: [d-i manual] copyright declaration
Hi, Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org wrote: Holger Wansing li...@wansing-online.de (2015-03-22): is there a reason why the year for copyright declaration should not be converted into an entity? Your change looks like a good idea to me. This has already been committed. Thanks Holger -- Created with Sylpheed 3.2.0 under D E B I A N L I N U X 7 . 0 W H E E Z Y ! Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150326114428.4c9ac1f3514453cc5737b...@wansing-online.de
Re: [d-i manual] copyright declaration
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 04:51:11PM +, peter green wrote: On 22/03/15 13:36, Holger Wansing wrote: Hi, is there a reason why the year for copyright declaration should not be converted into an entity? Would ease the repeating changing. Patch attached, works for both xml and po based translations. Correct me if I'm wrong here but shouldn't the copyright year only be updated when there is an actual change? Yes. I believe the copyright year is supposed to be the year of first publication. Which is why books updated frequently usually have multiple copyright years, one for each year new stuff got added. You get a notice like copyright 1968, 1979, 1997, 2014. -- hendrik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150323144349.ga22...@topoi.pooq.com
Re: [d-i manual] copyright declaration
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 10:43:49AM -0400, Hendrik Boom wrote: On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 04:51:11PM +, peter green wrote: On 22/03/15 13:36, Holger Wansing wrote: Hi, is there a reason why the year for copyright declaration should not be converted into an entity? Would ease the repeating changing. Patch attached, works for both xml and po based translations. Correct me if I'm wrong here but shouldn't the copyright year only be updated when there is an actual change? Yes. I believe the copyright year is supposed to be the year of first publication. Which is why books updated frequently usually have multiple copyright years, one for each year new stuff got added. You get a notice like copyright 1968, 1979, 1997, 2014. It might be possible to automate getting some of this information from revision control. -- hendrik -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150323144532.gb22...@topoi.pooq.com
Re: [d-i manual] copyright declaration
Holger Wansing li...@wansing-online.de (2015-03-22): is there a reason why the year for copyright declaration should not be converted into an entity? Your change looks like a good idea to me. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
[d-i manual] copyright declaration
Hi, is there a reason why the year for copyright declaration should not be converted into an entity? Would ease the repeating changing. Patch attached, works for both xml and po based translations. Holger -- Created with Sylpheed 3.2.0 under D E B I A N L I N U X 7 . 0 W H E E Z Y ! Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/ Index: de/bookinfo.xml === --- de/bookinfo.xml (Revision 69686) +++ de/bookinfo.xml (Arbeitskopie) @@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ /abstract copyright -year2004 ndash; 2015/year + year2004 ndash; current-year;/year holderDas Debian-Installer-Team/holder /copyright Index: eu/bookinfo.xml === --- eu/bookinfo.xml (Revision 69686) +++ eu/bookinfo.xml (Arbeitskopie) @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ /abstract copyright - year2004 ndash; 2015 + year2004 ndash; current-year; trademark class=copyright /trademark /year Index: it/bookinfo.xml === --- it/bookinfo.xml (Revision 69686) +++ it/bookinfo.xml (Arbeitskopie) @@ -96,7 +96,7 @@ /abstract copyright - year2004 ndash; 2015/year + year2004 ndash; current-year;/year holderDebian Installer team/holder /copyright Index: build/entities/common.ent === --- build/entities/common.ent (Revision 69686) +++ build/entities/common.ent (Arbeitskopie) @@ -2,6 +2,10 @@ !-- These entries should be language independent. -- !-- The *first* definition of an ENTITY wins. -- +!-- current year (to be used for copyright declaration). -- +!-- When changing this, also change in debian/copyright file)! -- +!ENTITY current-year 2015 + !-- short name to use for Debian -- !ENTITY debian Debian Index: en/bookinfo.xml === --- en/bookinfo.xml (Revision 69686) +++ en/bookinfo.xml (Arbeitskopie) @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ /abstract copyright - year2004 ndash; 2015/year + year2004 ndash; current-year;/year holderthe Debian Installer team/holder /copyright Index: ca/bookinfo.xml === --- ca/bookinfo.xml (Revision 69686) +++ ca/bookinfo.xml (Arbeitskopie) @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ /abstract copyright - year2004 ndash; 2015/year + year2004 ndash; current-year;/year holderl'equip de l'instal·lador de Debian/holder /copyright Index: cs/bookinfo.xml === --- cs/bookinfo.xml (Revision 69686) +++ cs/bookinfo.xml (Arbeitskopie) @@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ /abstract copyright - year2004 ndash; 2015/year + year2004 ndash; current-year;/year holdertým okolo instalaÄnÃho programu Debianu/holder /copyright Index: pt_BR/bookinfo.xml === --- pt_BR/bookinfo.xml (Revision 69686) +++ pt_BR/bookinfo.xml (Arbeitskopie) @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ /abstract copyright - year2004 ndash; 2015/year + year2004 ndash; current-year;/year holdero time do Instalador Debian (the Debian Installer team)/holder /copyright
Re: [d-i manual] copyright declaration
On 22/03/15 13:36, Holger Wansing wrote: Hi, is there a reason why the year for copyright declaration should not be converted into an entity? Would ease the repeating changing. Patch attached, works for both xml and po based translations. Correct me if I'm wrong here but shouldn't the copyright year only be updated when there is an actual change? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/550ef2ff.4060...@p10link.net
Re: [d-i manual] copyright declaration
Hi, Am So. Mär. 22 17:51:11 2015 GMT+0100 schrieb peter green: On 22/03/15 13:36, Holger Wansing wrote: Hi, is there a reason why the year for copyright declaration should not be converted into an entity? Would ease the repeating changing. Patch attached, works for both xml and po based translations. Correct me if I'm wrong here but shouldn't the copyright year only be updated when there is an actual change? There will rarely be a complete year without any changes... But if there is such a year to happen, the changing of the entity definition could be omitted. The setting of the entity content (= changing it) will still be a manual process, no automatism. Holger -- Sent from my Jolla http://jolla.com/, powered by Sailfish OS
