Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
On 13951 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work for people? Sounds ok to me. Start at 10 UTC or earlier/later? I was assuming either 8ish UTC (skipping dinstall) or 10ish UTC (after dinstall). Either would work for me, I'll just need more coffee for the former. :-) I've put 12 to 14 (so 10 to 12 UTC) in my calendar. -- bye, Joerg I think Smithers picked me because of my motivational skills. Everyone says they have to work a lot harder when I'm around. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87egm4n7zl@gkar.ganneff.de
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
On Sat, 2015-05-23 at 16:27 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: press@ - ping? :-) ... Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work for people? I can be available as a backup for Neil if needed. -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
On Thu, 2015-05-21 at 09:56 +0200, Joerg Jaspert wrote: On 13947 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to start planning for the first point release. We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some packages for which pu opu stable. Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work for people? Sounds ok to me. Start at 10 UTC or earlier/later? I was assuming either 8ish UTC (skipping dinstall) or 10ish UTC (after dinstall). Either would work for me, I'll just need more coffee for the former. :-) Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1432482871.1640.21.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
press@ - ping? :-) On Wed, 2015-05-20 at 21:22 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [Added some missed CCs; sigh] On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to start planning for the first point release. We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some packages for which pu opu stable. Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work for people? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1432394876.30889.24.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 09:22:44PM +0100, Adam Barratt wrote: On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [Added some missed CCs; sigh] On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to start planning for the first point release. We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some packages for which pu opu stable. Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work for people? Works for me, yes. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com This dress doesn't reverse. -- Alden Spiess -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20150521082137.gw4...@einval.com
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
On 13947 March 1977, Adam D. Barratt wrote: As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to start planning for the first point release. We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some packages for which pu opu stable. Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work for people? Sounds ok to me. Start at 10 UTC or earlier/later? -- bye, Joerg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/87vbfmz7lk@delenn.ganneff.de
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2015-05-20): Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work for people? Provided the p-u freeze happens on time so that I can perform d-i tests ahead of the release, that's fine with me; thanks. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
On Fri, 2015-05-01 at 11:17 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [Added some missed CCs; sigh] On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to start planning for the first point release. We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some packages for which pu opu stable. Based on received responses and the current date, I'm proposing June 6th for 8.1 (and then looking at other dates for 7.9). Does that still work for people? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1432153364.3938.14.ca...@adam-barratt.org.uk
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
[Added some missed CCs; sigh] On 2015-04-30 22:16, Adam D. Barratt wrote: Hi, As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to start planning for the first point release. We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some packages for which pu opu stable. Suggested dates (all of which appear to be okay for me currently): May 23/24 May 30/31 June 6/7 June 13/14 June 20/21 Cheers, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/0a70a4f9f4ea661be0e082441c776...@mowgli.jungle.funky-badger.org
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
On Fri, May 01, 2015 at 12:08:59PM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote: May 23/24 Offline-ish on May 23. Same for me. May 30/31 OK. OK June 6/7 Offline on June 6, offline-ish on June 7. OK June 13/14 Offline-ish on June 13. OK June 20/21 OK. Offline-ish both these days. Neil -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
(cc+=boot) Adam D. Barratt a...@adam-barratt.org.uk (2015-04-30): As seems to have become the norm, now that Jessie's out it's time to start planning for the first point release. AFAICT there haven't been too many reports of d-i being badly broken, so there's not much to be fixed. Here's a quick brain dump for jessie: - win32-loader is in the pu pipes already. - we might want to have hw-detect as well because acpi and friends, even if there's some discussion still taking place in #783247 after an upload to unstable. - it'd be nice to have a tasksel fix to allow gnome xfce to be coinstalled (foo → foo | bar in depends for a single package), even though the fix isn't in unstable yet. - I see gnutls28, linux, and wpa in pu; some testing couldn't hurt. What am I forgetting about? (I had noted down to maybe look into #781439 and #744865 but that hasn't happened yet.) We're also a little overdue for 7.9 as Jessie work took precedence; 7.9 really wants to take place after 8.1, as we have some packages for which pu opu stable. Besides the debootstrap pu for wheezy (already in the pipes), I don't think I've got anything planned for wheezy. Suggested dates (all of which appear to be okay for me currently): Keeping in mind testing d-i against stuff that's in pu (notably linux) should probably happen ahead of the release dates, let's see how much I'm available for the said dates… May 23/24 Offline-ish on May 23. May 30/31 OK. June 6/7 Offline on June 6, offline-ish on June 7. June 13/14 Offline-ish on June 13. June 20/21 OK. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: 8.1 (and maybe 7.9) planning
Hi On 2015-05-01, Cyril Brulebois wrote: [...] - I see gnutls28, linux, and wpa in pu; some testing couldn't hurt. wpa should be safe (famous last words), as it contains only the one-line security fix for CVE-2015-1863[1], which applies to a code path/ file not used by the udeb (as CONFIG_P2P is disabled there); the same goes for wheezy (where CONFIG_P2P is disabled alltogether). I've been testing all three versions (sid, jessie-security and wheezy-security) successfully in a non-udeb context - d-i is different of course and needs special testing, please let me know if there are any issues with the uploads. Regards Stefan Lippers-Hollmann [1] https://security-tracker.debian.org/tracker/DSA-3233-1 http://w1.fi/security/2015-1/ pgppzYIpiyDTt.pgp Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
