Bug#253789: netwinder tc1 success

2004-06-11 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 11:59:55AM +0100, Martin Michlmayr wrote:
> That's something I wanted to look in for a while.
>
Nod.

> This is actually a compiler bug, see #250185
>
Aye. I didn't mean to imply otherwise. The whole reason I'm using this
to test is that the nw running unstable was quite thoroughly broken. :)

Regards,
-- 
Kyle McMartin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#253789: netwinder tc1 success

2004-06-11 Thread Kyle McMartin
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 12:14:30PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> If this applies to arm in general, then we could do this:
>
> ...
> 
> If not, it'll be more complicated.
>
Nod. The Netwinder firmware is pretty braindead, so instead of having to
edit the kernfile variable to point to different versions, it would nice
to just leave /boot/vmlinuz. The logic behind this is that the NW
firmware can only read the kernel off a ext2 revision 0 filesystem, so
you basically *must* have a seperate boot.

> No, this has been reported elsewhere; I believe it's currently
> considered to be either a toolchain bug or a bug with libssl using
> incorrect optimizations, but I don't know the details.
>
Ok. Thanks,
-- 
Kyle McMartin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#253789: netwinder tc1 success

2004-06-11 Thread Martin Michlmayr
* Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-06-11 01:05]:
> Everything went swimmingly. When I rebooted to finish the install, I
> had to manually set the kernfile variable to
> /vmlinuz-2.4.25-netwinder. A better solution would be for the
> installer to detect that it's installing to a seperate /boot
> partition and to add a /boot/vmlinuz symlink instead of an /vmlinuz
> one.

That's something I wanted to look in for a while.

> As well, when I finished the base install (opting out of using
> tasksel or dselect), I was unable to install ssh. It installed to
> the point where it tried to generate keys, and then died with
> Illegal instruction. I suspect this is a hardware problem with my
> netwinder, however.

This is actually a compiler bug, see #250185

-- 
Martin Michlmayr
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#253789: netwinder tc1 success

2004-06-11 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Jun 11, 2004 at 01:05:21AM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> Everything went swimmingly. When I rebooted to finish the install, I had 
> to manually set the kernfile variable to /vmlinuz-2.4.25-netwinder. A 
> better solution would be for the installer to detect that it's installing 
> to a seperate /boot partition and to add a /boot/vmlinuz symlink instead of 
> an /vmlinuz one.

If this applies to arm in general, then we could do this:

Index: rootskel/debian/templates-arch
===
--- rootskel/debian/templates-arch  (revision 16700)
+++ rootskel/debian/templates-arch  (working copy)
@@ -63,6 +63,7 @@
 Default[sparc]: true
 Default[hppa]: true
 Default[powerpc]: true
+Default[arm]: true
 Description: kernel needs a link in /boot/ (linux only)
   Setting this to true makes base-installer include 'link_in_boot=yes'
   in /etc/kernel-img.conf.

If not, it'll be more complicated.

> As well, when I finished the base install (opting out of using tasksel or
> dselect), I was unable to install ssh. It installed to the point where it
> tried to generate keys, and then died with Illegal instruction. I suspect
> this is a hardware problem with my netwinder, however.

No, this has been reported elsewhere; I believe it's currently
considered to be either a toolchain bug or a bug with libssl using
incorrect optimizations, but I don't know the details.

Cheers,

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#253789: netwinder tc1 success

2004-06-10 Thread Kyle McMartin
Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: test candidate 1
uname -a: Linux orodruin 2.4.25-netwinder #1 Tue May 18 00:49:19 BST 2004 armv4l 
GNU/Linux
Date: Fri Jun 11 00:53:40 EDT 2004
Method: netboot
Booted off the network (tftp) and installed from archive.progeny.com.

Machine: Rebel Netwinder
Processor: StrongARM-110 rev 3
Memory: 64M
Root Device: IDE
Root Size/partition table: 
100M /dev/hda1  /boot
1.9G /dev/hda2  /
128M /dev/hda3  swap

Output of lspci: [typed by hand, excuse errors]

:00:00.0 Co-processor: Digital Equipment Corporation StrongARM DC21285 (rev 03)
:00:09.0 VGA compatible controller: Intergraphics Systems CyberPro 2000 (rev 01)
:00:0a.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21142/43 (rev 
30)
:00:0c.0 ISA bridge: Symphony Labs W83C553 (rev 05)
:00:0c.1 IDE interface: Symphony Labs SL82c105 (rev 05)
:00:0d.0 Ethernet controller: Winbond Electronics Corp W89C940F

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:[O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network: [O]
Detect CD:  [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives: [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:[O]
Mount partitions:   [O]
Install base system:[O]
Install boot loader:[O]
Reboot: [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:

Everything went swimmingly. When I rebooted to finish the install, I had 
to manually set the kernfile variable to /vmlinuz-2.4.25-netwinder. A 
better solution would be for the installer to detect that it's installing 
to a seperate /boot partition and to add a /boot/vmlinuz symlink instead of 
an /vmlinuz one.

As well, when I finished the base install (opting out of using tasksel or
dselect), I was unable to install ssh. It installed to the point where it
tried to generate keys, and then died with Illegal instruction. I suspect
this is a hardware problem with my netwinder, however.

Cheers for the good work, the progress is fantastic!
-- 
Kyle McMartin


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]