Bug#255439: Bug#255689: Bug#255439: d-i report

2004-09-27 Thread Branden Robinson
clone 255439 -1 -2
submitter -1 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
submitter -2 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
retitle -1 xserver-xfree86: [debconf] set subarchitecture-based Macintosh defaults for 
keyboard on m68k and powerpc Macs
retitle -2 xserver-xfree86: [debconf] permit blank answers for monitor sync ranges
reassign -1 xserver-xfree86
reassign -2 xserver-xfree86
severity -1 wishlist
severity -2 wishlist
thanks

On Fri, Aug 20, 2004 at 10:11:34AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Am checking with the 5964 (Radeon 9200 SE) right now on a cleanly installed
> d-i install without any of the extra tasksel desktop stuff. A first few comments : 
> 
>   1) i still get proposed a macintosh keyboard by default. i need an pc105
>   one. Maybe it would be possible to check the subarch, if it is a pmac, then
>   propose macintosh, if not, then propose pcXXX stuff.

Yes.  Something similar should be done for m68k Macs.  They need to use
"macintosh_old", since 2.4 isn't available for that subarch.  Debian 68k
guys, is it reasonable to expect 2.6 m68k Mac kernels to use Linux keycodes
by default?

Cloning a bug for this.

>   2) it proposed me the us keyboard. Maybe this could be taken from the chosen
>   language used for the console and found in the debconf database ? 

Yes; there have been several bugs filed about this already, so I'm not
cloning a new one.  See #238778, #239827, #242321, and #242605.

>   3) it is not possible to propose an empty monitor lines. I have a DVI
>   connected LCD flat panel, and comenting out the monitor frequencies works
>   best.

Cloning a bug for this.

d-i guys, I'm done with this bug (#255439) if you want to close it.

-- 
G. Branden Robinson|  "There is no gravity in space."
Debian GNU/Linux   |  "Then how could astronauts walk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] |   around on the Moon?"
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |  "Because they wore heavy boots."


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Processed: Re: Bug#255439: Bug#255689: Bug#255439: d-i report

2004-09-27 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing commands for [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

> clone 255439 -1 -2
Bug#255439: d-i report
Bug 255439 cloned as bugs 273774-273775.

> submitter -1 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#273774: d-i report
Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> submitter -2 Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bug#273775: d-i report
Changed Bug submitter from [EMAIL PROTECTED] to Sven Luther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.

> retitle -1 xserver-xfree86: [debconf] set subarchitecture-based Macintosh defaults 
> for keyboard on m68k and powerpc Macs
Bug#273774: d-i report
Changed Bug title.

> retitle -2 xserver-xfree86: [debconf] permit blank answers for monitor sync ranges
Bug#273775: d-i report
Changed Bug title.

> reassign -1 xserver-xfree86
Bug#273774: xserver-xfree86: [debconf] set subarchitecture-based Macintosh defaults 
for keyboard on m68k and powerpc Macs
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `xserver-xfree86'.

> reassign -2 xserver-xfree86
Bug#273775: xserver-xfree86: [debconf] permit blank answers for monitor sync ranges
Bug reassigned from package `installation-reports' to `xserver-xfree86'.

> severity -1 wishlist
Bug#273774: xserver-xfree86: [debconf] set subarchitecture-based Macintosh defaults 
for keyboard on m68k and powerpc Macs
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> severity -2 wishlist
Bug#273775: xserver-xfree86: [debconf] permit blank answers for monitor sync ranges
Severity set to `wishlist'.

> thanks
Stopping processing here.

Please contact me if you need assistance.

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#255439: Bug#255689: Bug#255439: d-i report

2004-08-20 Thread Sven Luther
On Thu, Aug 19, 2004 at 11:59:49AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 08:41:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 07:31:23PM -0700, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:08:58AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > > There's the problem.  "radeon" is not a legal value.
> > > > 
> > > > Use "ati" instead.
> > > > 
> > > > Do not use "atimisc", "r128", or "radeon".
> > > 
> > > 'radeon' should be perfectly legal, and just sedded to 'ati' in the
> > > XFree86 scripts if they really want to enforce this whole 'only ever use
> > > the wrapper' thingo.
> > 
> > Problem seems to be that the ati wrapper has some troubles for some of the
> > Radoen 9200 cards, and doesn't load the radeon module appropriately in these
> > cases.
> 
> That sounds like a bug.

Indeed.

> > I will recheck with both my 5961 and 5964 cards again and confirm this.
> 
> Okay.  Please do, and file a bug if you can still reproduce the problem.

Am checking with the 5964 (Radeon 9200 SE) right now on a cleanly installed
d-i install without any of the extra tasksel desktop stuff. A first few comments : 

  1) i still get proposed a macintosh keyboard by default. i need an pc105
  one. Maybe it would be possible to check the subarch, if it is a pmac, then
  propose macintosh, if not, then propose pcXXX stuff.

  2) it proposed me the us keyboard. Maybe this could be taken from the chosen
  language used for the console and found in the debconf database ? 

  3) it is not possible to propose an empty monitor lines. I have a DVI
  connected LCD flat panel, and comenting out the monitor frequencies works
  best.

Ok, apart from that, the 9200 SE (5964) worked fine, will check the pure 9200
(5961) later and report back.

That said, killing X from the console messes up the console, but this is
probably a kernel issue, or a radeonfb<->X radeon driver interaction.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#255439: Bug#255689: Bug#255439: d-i report

2004-08-19 Thread Branden Robinson
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 08:41:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 07:31:23PM -0700, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:08:58AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > > There's the problem.  "radeon" is not a legal value.
> > > 
> > > Use "ati" instead.
> > > 
> > > Do not use "atimisc", "r128", or "radeon".
> > 
> > 'radeon' should be perfectly legal, and just sedded to 'ati' in the
> > XFree86 scripts if they really want to enforce this whole 'only ever use
> > the wrapper' thingo.
> 
> Problem seems to be that the ati wrapper has some troubles for some of the
> Radoen 9200 cards, and doesn't load the radeon module appropriately in these
> cases.

That sounds like a bug.

> I will recheck with both my 5961 and 5964 cards again and confirm this.

Okay.  Please do, and file a bug if you can still reproduce the problem.

-- 
Branden Robinson  | GPG signed/encrypted mail welcome
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | 1024D/9C0BCBFB
Progeny Linux Systems | D5F6 D4C9 E25B 3D37 068C
  | 72E8 0F42 191A 9C0B CBFB


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#255439: Bug#255689: Bug#255439: d-i report

2004-08-17 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 07:31:23PM -0700, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:08:58AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > There's the problem.  "radeon" is not a legal value.
> > 
> > Use "ati" instead.
> > 
> > Do not use "atimisc", "r128", or "radeon".
> 
> 'radeon' should be perfectly legal, and just sedded to 'ati' in the
> XFree86 scripts if they really want to enforce this whole 'only ever use
> the wrapper' thingo.

Problem seems to be that the ati wrapper has some troubles for some of the
Radoen 9200 cards, and doesn't load the radeon module appropriately in these
cases. I will recheck with both my 5961 and 5964 cards again and confirm this.

Friendly,

Sven Luther


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Bug#255439: Bug#255689: Bug#255439: d-i report

2004-08-17 Thread Daniel Stone
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:08:58AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> There's the problem.  "radeon" is not a legal value.
> 
> Use "ati" instead.
> 
> Do not use "atimisc", "r128", or "radeon".

'radeon' should be perfectly legal, and just sedded to 'ati' in the
XFree86 scripts if they really want to enforce this whole 'only ever use
the wrapper' thingo.

-- 
Daniel Stone<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Debian: the universal operating system http://www.debian.org


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#255439: Bug#255689: Bug#255439: d-i report

2004-07-14 Thread Branden Robinson
On Tue, Jul 13, 2004 at 11:08:58AM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 02:05:51PM -0300, Cristian Escalante wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 04:09:46PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> > >
> > > The XFree86 X server used the driver it was told to use.
> > >
> > > There are only two ways you can tell the XFree86 X server which driver to
> > > use in the d-i environment:
> > >
> > > 1) Answer a debconf question.
> > > 2) Have the question pre-answered by discover.
> > Actually, the question was answered by discover (from config script):
> > 
> > mob:/# /sbin/discover --disable=serial,parallel --format="%V %M\t%S\t%D\n" video
> > ATI Technologies, Inc. Radeon Mobility U1   XFree86 radeon
> 
> There's the problem.  "radeon" is not a legal value.
> 
> Use "ati" instead.
> 
> Do not use "atimisc", "r128", or "radeon".

Clarification:

Discover-data maintainers,

This means you!

-- 
G. Branden Robinson| I'm a firm believer in not drawing
Debian GNU/Linux   | trend lines before you have data
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | points.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Tim Ottinger


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Bug#255439: Bug#255689: Bug#255439: d-i report

2004-07-13 Thread Branden Robinson
On Mon, Jul 12, 2004 at 02:05:51PM -0300, Cristian Escalante wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 08, 2004 at 04:09:46PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> >
> > The XFree86 X server used the driver it was told to use.
> >
> > There are only two ways you can tell the XFree86 X server which driver to
> > use in the d-i environment:
> >
> > 1) Answer a debconf question.
> > 2) Have the question pre-answered by discover.
> Actually, the question was answered by discover (from config script):
> 
> mob:/# /sbin/discover --disable=serial,parallel --format="%V %M\t%S\t%D\n" video
> ATI Technologies, Inc. Radeon Mobility U1   XFree86 radeon

There's the problem.  "radeon" is not a legal value.

Use "ati" instead.

Do not use "atimisc", "r128", or "radeon".

-- 
Branden Robinson  | GPG signed/encrypted mail welcome
[EMAIL PROTECTED]   | 1024D/9C0BCBFB
Progeny Linux Systems | D5F6 D4C9 E25B 3D37 068C
  | 72E8 0F42 191A 9C0B CBFB


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]