Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind
[ Fact checking needed. ] Michael Gilbert (2014-11-02): > Is it possibly a one or two line diff to change back to isc-dhcp? If > so, it is possible that it may be considered. No. > Since isc-dhcp was the wheezy default […] No. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind
On Fri, Oct 31, 2014 at 9:57 AM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 31/10/14 10:44, Michael Tokarev wrote: >> Is it on kfreebsd, or on linux kernel too? I wonder maybe we should >> switch to isc-dhcp on all variants/arches, and ditch udhcpc... > > Linux d-i only uses udhcpc at the moment. (Ubuntu uses isc-dhcp though > IIRC). We did discuss converging on a single DHCP client across all > Debian architectures, but: > > * it's way too late to do this for jessie, I doubt KiBi would even > hear of it! d-i can be very sensitive to changes and this might break > in non-obvious use cases that don't get tested much Is it possibly a one or two line diff to change back to isc-dhcp? If so, it is possible that it may be considered. Is that set in netcfg? Since isc-dhcp was the wheezy default and there are quite a few issues (including RC ones) stemming from udhcpc, it probably makes a lot of sense to go back to what's known to work well. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MOdvF8=1wwvt0v2fyyh_bwkv_abcmj2crtwjpw_omr...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind
On 31/10/14 10:44, Michael Tokarev wrote: > Is it on kfreebsd, or on linux kernel too? I wonder maybe we should > switch to isc-dhcp on all variants/arches, and ditch udhcpc... Linux d-i only uses udhcpc at the moment. (Ubuntu uses isc-dhcp though IIRC). We did discuss converging on a single DHCP client across all Debian architectures, but: * it's way too late to do this for jessie, I doubt KiBi would even hear of it! d-i can be very sensitive to changes and this might break in non-obvious use cases that don't get tested much * for jessie+1, I think it's still early to decide this yet. I know that systemd will have a DHCP client - d-i doesn't currently use systemd, but who knows what could happen in 2 years; we also don't know yet if there'll be a kfreebsd in jessie+1 officially So I think we might come back to this a while after jessie is released. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54539536.9030...@pyro.eu.org
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind
On Fri, 31 Oct 2014 13:44:25 +0300 Michael Tokarev wrote: > 31.10.2014 13:42, Herbert Kaminski wrote: > > Just tested the netinst daily image as of 2014-10-31: > > dhcp now works again in the installer. > > Is it on kfreebsd, or on linux kernel too? I wonder maybe we should > switch to isc-dhcp on all variants/arches, and ditch udhcpc... I tested the linux netinst-amd64 daily yesterday, and DHCP was OK. I do linux test installations about once a week and never saw a DHCP problem. Herbert -- Herbert Kaminski D-26122 Oldenburg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141031144452.1de7a62d@toshi
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind
31.10.2014 13:42, Herbert Kaminski wrote: > On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 22:37:24 + > Steven Chamberlain wrote: > >> On 20/10/14 01:09, Michael Gilbert wrote: >>> The new isc-dhcp is now uploaded. Please let me know how your testing goes. >> >> After the upload of bind9/1:9.9.5.dfsg-5, this does seem to be working >> well now in sid d-i. Thanks. > > Just tested the netinst daily image as of 2014-10-31: > dhcp now works again in the installer. Is it on kfreebsd, or on linux kernel too? I wonder maybe we should switch to isc-dhcp on all variants/arches, and ditch udhcpc... Thanks, /mjt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/54536809.2020...@msgid.tls.msk.ru
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 22:37:24 + Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 20/10/14 01:09, Michael Gilbert wrote: > > The new isc-dhcp is now uploaded. Please let me know how your testing goes. > > After the upload of bind9/1:9.9.5.dfsg-5, this does seem to be working > well now in sid d-i. Thanks. Just tested the netinst daily image as of 2014-10-31: dhcp now works again in the installer. Regards, Herbert -- Herbert Kaminski D-26122 Oldenburg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141031114225.2a0918b1@toshi
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
On 20/10/14 01:09, Michael Gilbert wrote: > The new isc-dhcp is now uploaded. Please let me know how your testing goes. After the upload of bind9/1:9.9.5.dfsg-5, this does seem to be working well now in sid d-i. Thanks. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 00:52, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> Michael Gilbert wrote: >> > Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat >> > easy for porters to test? >> >> I don't particularly need that as I can build the udebs and d-i image >> from them myself. But doing so would allow others to be testing it >> meanwhile, so I'm okay with it. > > Did you already make a new version of the isc-dhcp package based on > these new export udebs? If so, where can I find it? Hi Steven, The new isc-dhcp is now uploaded. Please let me know how your testing goes. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mpbb25ndu4q1udfxrh2cph3vfxhorfo6xk-jcxg3sa...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > On 00:52, Steven Chamberlain wrote: >> Michael Gilbert wrote: >> > Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat >> > easy for porters to test? >> >> I don't particularly need that as I can build the udebs and d-i image >> from them myself. But doing so would allow others to be testing it >> meanwhile, so I'm okay with it. > > Did you already make a new version of the isc-dhcp package based on > these new export udebs? If so, where can I find it? No, not yet. Will probably get to that tomorrow. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MNmqCSH4fnnXCE80=f1Z3B1A+Y2F=1idn-tzifb9+x...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
On 00:52, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > Michael Gilbert wrote: > > Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat > > easy for porters to test? > > I don't particularly need that as I can build the udebs and d-i image > from them myself. But doing so would allow others to be testing it > meanwhile, so I'm okay with it. Did you already make a new version of the isc-dhcp package based on these new export udebs? If so, where can I find it? Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141007011138.gi25...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
Steven Chamberlain (2014-10-07): > I will try to find time to do this. Probably it is desirable, because > it should reduce the overall size of udebs in the installer ramdisks? I'm not sure how moving from an embedded code copy to shared libraries across several udebs but used by a single udeb is going to help reduce anything as far as size is concerned. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
Michael Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > > I'm not going to go through building this on a kfreebsd porterbox to try > > and figure out how isc-dhcp would look if rebuilt against such packages, > > but that looks a saner base for porters to build upon. > > > > That doesn't make the timing issues I've mentioned disappear though. I'm > > OK with thinking about it again if porters endorse/welcome/successfully > > test the resulting packages and installation images. I will try to find time to do this. Probably it is desirable, because it should reduce the overall size of udebs in the installer ramdisks? > Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat > easy for porters to test? I don't particularly need that as I can build the udebs and d-i image from them myself. But doing so would allow others to be testing it meanwhile, so I'm okay with it. Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141006235202.gg25...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
Michael Gilbert (2014-10-05): > Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat > easy for porters to test? Since D-I Jessie Beta 2 is out I can't think of a reason why that wouldn't be a good idea. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I'm not going to go through building this on a kfreebsd porterbox to try > and figure out how isc-dhcp would look if rebuilt against such packages, > but that looks a saner base for porters to build upon. > > That doesn't make the timing issues I've mentioned disappear though. I'm > OK with thinking about it again if porters endorse/welcome/successfully > test the resulting packages and installation images. Thanks for the feedback. Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat easy for porters to test? Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mpb5cgpq1oe6d_vpsoggyk6o3y2bqrrxwba_ozlh6m...@mail.gmail.com
