Re: Minutes of #debian-boot meeting of 20040706 (was: Debian Installer IRCmeeting on Tuesday 07/06 20:00 UTC)

2004-07-10 Thread Rick Thomas


Rick Thomas wrote:
 
 Joey Hess wrote:
 
  Rick Thomas wrote:
   Last night I tried installing both 2.4 and 2.6 on my OldWorld Beige G3.
   (using the sarge netinst daily CD from 2004/07/07)  Neither worked, but
   for different reasons.
  
   I've sent installation reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but they
   haven't yet shown up on the list with a bug number.
  
   kernel 2.6 died trying to discover disk hardware -- segfaults.
  
   kernel 2.4 died trying to install a kernel -- something about missing
   dependencies involving kernel modules package.
 
  I don't know about your 2.6 problem, but 0707 was a bad day to be
  testing, since none of the images install at all. The second problem you
  encountered is likely due to that, though I'm not 100% sure.
 
 
 
 OK,  I'll try again with a later iso.  Is 0708 likely to be any better?

The 0708 netinst CD using the 2.6 kernel gave me the same symptoms
-- segfaults trying to discover disk hardware.  I think discover1
is not playing well with the 2.6 kernel.

The 0708 netinst CD using the 2.4 kernel is feeling much better
thankyou!  The only strange thing it's done (so far) is to try to
install quik on my OldWorld (beige G3) PowerMac.  It's not
supposed to do that, is it?

Installation reports are being submitted with the details.

Enjoy!

Rick


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Minutes of #debian-boot meeting of 20040706 (was: Debian Installer IRCmeeting on Tuesday 07/06 20:00 UTC)

2004-07-10 Thread Colin Watson
On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 03:09:14AM -0400, Rick Thomas wrote:
 The 0708 netinst CD using the 2.4 kernel is feeling much better
 thankyou!  The only strange thing it's done (so far) is to try to
 install quik on my OldWorld (beige G3) PowerMac.  It's not
 supposed to do that, is it?

Umm ... what's wrong with installing quik on OldWorld? That's what it's
for ...

-- 
Colin Watson  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Minutes of #debian-boot meeting of 20040706 (was: Debian Installer IRCmeeting on Tuesday 07/06 20:00 UTC)

2004-07-09 Thread Rick Thomas

 powerpc
 ===
 
 In unstable, 2.4 and 2.6 both work fine on newworld pmac. 2.4 oldworld
 pmac is unbootable, but then again it always has been.
 
 It is reasonable to move for a 2.6 powerpc kernel for sarge, for all
 currently supported architectures, the support for those is
 better, and upstream (that is the linuxppc folk) as well as our own
 kernel powerpc specialist are favoring 2.6 development and bug fix over
 2.4.

Last night I tried installing both 2.4 and 2.6 on my OldWorld Beige G3.
(using the sarge netinst daily CD from 2004/07/07)  Neither worked, but
for different reasons.

I've sent installation reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but they
haven't yet shown up on the list with a bug number. 

kernel 2.6 died trying to discover disk hardware -- segfaults.

kernel 2.4 died trying to install a kernel -- something about missing
dependencies involving kernel modules package.


 
 oldworld has a bootloader installer so if you boot it using BootX that
 should theoretically be OK, but there's been zero testing. BootX depends
 on non-free macos 9.

Booting either 2.4 or 2.6 via BootX works just fine, thanks!  I don't
mind giving over a few hundred Mbytes (on a 160 GByte disk!) to MacOS-9
in exchange for a stable boot-loader environment.


 No RC issues, apart possibly from Sven's keymap thing.
 

Depends on whether you count the two bugs I mentioned above.


Enjoy!

Rick


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Minutes of #debian-boot meeting of 20040706 (was: Debian Installer IRCmeeting on Tuesday 07/06 20:00 UTC)

2004-07-09 Thread Joey Hess
Rick Thomas wrote:
 Last night I tried installing both 2.4 and 2.6 on my OldWorld Beige G3.
 (using the sarge netinst daily CD from 2004/07/07)  Neither worked, but
 for different reasons.
 
 I've sent installation reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but they
 haven't yet shown up on the list with a bug number. 
 
 kernel 2.6 died trying to discover disk hardware -- segfaults.
 
 kernel 2.4 died trying to install a kernel -- something about missing
 dependencies involving kernel modules package.

I don't know about your 2.6 problem, but 0707 was a bad day to be
testing, since none of the images install at all. The second problem you
encountered is likely due to that, though I'm not 100% sure.

-- 
see shy jo


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Minutes of #debian-boot meeting of 20040706 (was: Debian Installer IRCmeeting on Tuesday 07/06 20:00 UTC)

2004-07-09 Thread Rick Thomas


Joey Hess wrote:
 
 Rick Thomas wrote:
  Last night I tried installing both 2.4 and 2.6 on my OldWorld Beige G3.
  (using the sarge netinst daily CD from 2004/07/07)  Neither worked, but
  for different reasons.
 
  I've sent installation reports to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but they
  haven't yet shown up on the list with a bug number.
 
  kernel 2.6 died trying to discover disk hardware -- segfaults.
 
  kernel 2.4 died trying to install a kernel -- something about missing
  dependencies involving kernel modules package.
 
 I don't know about your 2.6 problem, but 0707 was a bad day to be
 testing, since none of the images install at all. The second problem you
 encountered is likely due to that, though I'm not 100% sure.
 


OK,  I'll try again with a later iso.  Is 0708 likely to be any better?

Rick


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]