Re: [PATCH 2/3] Make udhcpc continuously retry getting a lease until dhcp_timeout.
On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 11:34:44AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: > On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 01:58, Matthew Palmer wrote: > > I'd recommend this patch be applied before the Squeeze release, as there are > > a number of bugs related to DHCP timeouts, as Ferenc mentions. I'm not sure > > that the other patches should be applied pre-Squeeze; the cleanups involved > > are minor. > > I agree however... > > > Otavio, any objection to me committing this patch to SVN? (I'm assuming > > that Ferenc doesn't have SVN commit access...) I'm happy to do the upload, > > too, if that's necessary. > > At this moment, yes. > > Please commit it but don't upload it. Committed, not uploaded. Thanks for the patch, Ferenc. I've also committed your other two patches to my local d-i git repo, for pushing into SVN once squeeze is out. - Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110107234930.gt2...@hezmatt.org
Re: [PATCH 2/3] Make udhcpc continuously retry getting a lease until dhcp_timeout.
Hello, On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 01:58, Matthew Palmer wrote: > I'd recommend this patch be applied before the Squeeze release, as there are > a number of bugs related to DHCP timeouts, as Ferenc mentions. I'm not sure > that the other patches should be applied pre-Squeeze; the cleanups involved > are minor. I agree however... > Otavio, any objection to me committing this patch to SVN? (I'm assuming > that Ferenc doesn't have SVN commit access...) I'm happy to do the upload, > too, if that's necessary. At this moment, yes. Please commit it but don't upload it. Once rc1 is out, we can try to put it in if we need an rc2 or do it on Squeeze r1. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlktikfgmptisxk2cb0po1zcku=uwk=7imofadwm...@mail.gmail.com
Re: [PATCH 2/3] Make udhcpc continuously retry getting a lease until dhcp_timeout.
On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 14:58:58 +1100, Matthew Palmer wrote: > I'd recommend this patch be applied before the Squeeze release, as there are > a number of bugs related to DHCP timeouts, as Ferenc mentions. I'm not sure > that the other patches should be applied pre-Squeeze; the cleanups involved > are minor. > I'm not sure about squeeze r0, I guess it depends whether we need a rc2. But it can probably be included in an installer rebuild for a point release if it doesn't make r0? Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: [PATCH 2/3] Make udhcpc continuously retry getting a lease until dhcp_timeout.
Matthew Palmer writes: > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 09:32:02PM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > >> Signed-off-by: Ferenc Wagner >> --- >> packages/netcfg/dhcp.c | 10 -- >> 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/packages/netcfg/dhcp.c b/packages/netcfg/dhcp.c >> index f706c5c..385799b 100644 > > I've reviewed and tested this patch, and it looks good. I tested it by > running a DHCP install with the DHCP server off, and then starting it when > the progress bar was at around 50%. Without the patch applied, DHCP failed > and I was asked to manually configure the network. With the patch applied, > udhcpc quickly found the DHCP server and we were away. Dumping the traffic > with tcpdump also showed a lot more DHCP requests flying around. Thanks for the review and the testing! > I'd recommend this patch be applied before the Squeeze release, as there are > a number of bugs related to DHCP timeouts, as Ferenc mentions. I'm not sure > that the other patches should be applied pre-Squeeze; the cleanups involved > are minor. Yes, they don't even influence the object code I suppose. I included the first only because the next part touched that line anyway, so it would feel silly to leave the mistake in place. > Otavio, any objection to me committing this patch to SVN? (I'm assuming > that Ferenc doesn't have SVN commit access...) Correct. :) -- Thanks, Feri. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87fwt52dpj@tac.ki.iif.hu
Re: [PATCH 2/3] Make udhcpc continuously retry getting a lease until dhcp_timeout.
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 09:32:02PM +0100, Ferenc Wagner wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Ferenc Wagner > --- > packages/netcfg/dhcp.c | 10 -- > 1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/packages/netcfg/dhcp.c b/packages/netcfg/dhcp.c > index f706c5c..385799b 100644 I've reviewed and tested this patch, and it looks good. I tested it by running a DHCP install with the DHCP server off, and then starting it when the progress bar was at around 50%. Without the patch applied, DHCP failed and I was asked to manually configure the network. With the patch applied, udhcpc quickly found the DHCP server and we were away. Dumping the traffic with tcpdump also showed a lot more DHCP requests flying around. I'd recommend this patch be applied before the Squeeze release, as there are a number of bugs related to DHCP timeouts, as Ferenc mentions. I'm not sure that the other patches should be applied pre-Squeeze; the cleanups involved are minor. Otavio, any objection to me committing this patch to SVN? (I'm assuming that Ferenc doesn't have SVN commit access...) I'm happy to do the upload, too, if that's necessary. - Matt -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110107035858.go2...@hezmatt.org