Re: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#827951: libssl udeb inclusion in Jessie
On 2016-06-24 10:35:43 [+0200], Yann Soubeyrand wrote: > Le jeudi 23 juin 2016 à 23:13 +0200, jcris...@debian.org a écrit : > > That doesn't sound suitable for a stable update, sorry. > OK, I understand. Closing with no change then. Sebastian
Re: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#827951: libssl udeb inclusion in Jessie
Le jeudi 23 juin 2016 à 23:13 +0200, jcris...@debian.org a écrit : > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:55:54 +0200, Yann Soubeyrand wrote: > > > Le jeudi 23 juin 2016 à 11:20 +0200, k...@roeckx.be a écrit : > > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:58:54AM +0200, Yann Soubeyrand wrote: > > > > Package: openssl > > > > Severity: normal > > > > Version: 1.0.1t-1+deb8u2 > > > > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org > > > > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-boot@lists.debian.org > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Marga Manterola provided a patch to build a libssl udeb as well as the > > > > libcrypto udeb that was included in Sid (#802591). Could this patch be a > > > > candidate for Jessie inclusion? If so, you can find a patch attached to > > > > this mail. > > > > > > Is there a reason why you would like it in jessie? Will the > > > installer start to make use of it? > > > > > > Kurt > > > > At the company I work for, we customize the installer to fit our needs > > and we make use of wget udeb's https support. It would make our task > > simpler not to have to maintain a modified version of openssl and wget > > packages. > > > That doesn't sound suitable for a stable update, sorry. > > Cheers, > Julien OK, I understand. Cheers Yann
Re: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#827951: libssl udeb inclusion in Jessie
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:55:54 +0200, Yann Soubeyrand wrote: > Le jeudi 23 juin 2016 à 11:20 +0200, k...@roeckx.be a écrit : > > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:58:54AM +0200, Yann Soubeyrand wrote: > > > Package: openssl > > > Severity: normal > > > Version: 1.0.1t-1+deb8u2 > > > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org > > > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-boot@lists.debian.org > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Marga Manterola provided a patch to build a libssl udeb as well as the > > > libcrypto udeb that was included in Sid (#802591). Could this patch be a > > > candidate for Jessie inclusion? If so, you can find a patch attached to > > > this mail. > > > > Is there a reason why you would like it in jessie? Will the > > installer start to make use of it? > > > > Kurt > > At the company I work for, we customize the installer to fit our needs > and we make use of wget udeb's https support. It would make our task > simpler not to have to maintain a modified version of openssl and wget > packages. > That doesn't sound suitable for a stable update, sorry. Cheers, Julien
Re: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#827951: libssl udeb inclusion in Jessie
Le jeudi 23 juin 2016 à 11:20 +0200, k...@roeckx.be a écrit : > On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:58:54AM +0200, Yann Soubeyrand wrote: > > Package: openssl > > Severity: normal > > Version: 1.0.1t-1+deb8u2 > > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org > > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-boot@lists.debian.org > > > > Hi, > > > > Marga Manterola provided a patch to build a libssl udeb as well as the > > libcrypto udeb that was included in Sid (#802591). Could this patch be a > > candidate for Jessie inclusion? If so, you can find a patch attached to > > this mail. > > Is there a reason why you would like it in jessie? Will the > installer start to make use of it? > > Kurt At the company I work for, we customize the installer to fit our needs and we make use of wget udeb's https support. It would make our task simpler not to have to maintain a modified version of openssl and wget packages.
Re: [Pkg-openssl-devel] Bug#827951: libssl udeb inclusion in Jessie
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 10:58:54AM +0200, Yann Soubeyrand wrote: > Package: openssl > Severity: normal > Version: 1.0.1t-1+deb8u2 > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-rele...@lists.debian.org > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-boot@lists.debian.org > > Hi, > > Marga Manterola provided a patch to build a libssl udeb as well as the > libcrypto udeb that was included in Sid (#802591). Could this patch be a > candidate for Jessie inclusion? If so, you can find a patch attached to > this mail. Is there a reason why you would like it in jessie? Will the installer start to make use of it? Kurt
