Re: Bug#237534: inst report: lots of partman and LVM issues

2004-03-12 Thread Frans Pop
On Friday 12 March 2004 10:17, Erich Waelde wrote:
> would it seem reasonable to add another boot method (don't know a better
> term) to d-i like so
>
> NameSetting  Description
> linux   DEBCONF_PRIORITY=highminimum questions asked (recommended)
> custom  DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium  more options on bootloader, networking,
> file systems expert  DEBCONF_PRIORITY=low full control especially on hw
> and kernel modules
>
> Excuse: I see that often we have to tell folks use:
> "DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium", which is awkward to type on a foreign keyboard
> anyway.  We could, if enough like it, add Name and Description above the
> first prompt. Maybe that lead to lesser people pressing 'F1' to read the
> help, I don't know.
>
Second.
Maybe custom could/should be recommended for server installation (and linux 
for workstations).


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Bug#237534: inst report: lots of partman and LVM issues

2004-03-12 Thread Erich Waelde

Hello,

Christian Perrier writes:
 > Quoting Joey Hess ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
 > 
 > > > Not sure.  Maybe "Partition disks" and "Partition disks (cfdisk)"
 > > > since cfdisk might be a term people understand... but that's not ideal
 > > > either.  I'm sorry I don't have a good solution either. :/
 > > 
 > > cfdisk is not used on all architectures. There's also the queston of
 > > what to call partconf.
 > 
 > In another thread, I suggested "Partition disks (expert)" for partconf
 > and "Partition disks" alone for partman.
 > 

I would strongly recommend to use the "real" names somewhere in the
description. Otherwise it is never clear, which one of the several
(including cfdisk and whatnot) partitioners was used in a certain case.
 eg.  
  Partition disks, recommended tool (partman)
  Partition disks (partconf)
  Partition disks (cfdisk)
so I would support Joey's idea, even if he doesn't seem to like it :-)
I'm not so clear about what to show when (priority, arch), because all I
know is i386


Somewhat off-topic, but also a description thing:

would it seem reasonable to add another boot method (don't know a better
term) to d-i like so

NameSetting  Description
linux   DEBCONF_PRIORITY=highminimum questions asked (recommended)
custom  DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium  more options on bootloader, networking, file systems
expert  DEBCONF_PRIORITY=low full control especially on hw and kernel modules

Excuse: I see that often we have to tell folks use:
"DEBCONF_PRIORITY=medium", which is awkward to type on a foreign keyboard
anyway.  We could, if enough like it, add Name and Description above the
first prompt. Maybe that lead to lesser people pressing 'F1' to read the
help, I don't know.


 > That way, all partman-supported archs will have a quite clear choice
 > and non partman supported archs will only have "expert" which is not
 > really a problem as these architectures are indeed often used by
 > experts..:-)
 > 
 > Moreover, the choice will only be shown at medium priority which is
 > already a choice for "experts"
 > 
 > This terminology is the one I've already seen in RedHat 8 as far as I
 > remember.
 > 
 > 


Comments?
Erich


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]