Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
On Thu, 30 Oct 2014 22:37:24 + Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote: On 20/10/14 01:09, Michael Gilbert wrote: The new isc-dhcp is now uploaded. Please let me know how your testing goes. After the upload of bind9/1:9.9.5.dfsg-5, this does seem to be working well now in sid d-i. Thanks. Just tested the netinst daily image as of 2014-10-31: dhcp now works again in the installer. Regards, Herbert -- Herbert Kaminski D-26122 Oldenburg -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141031114225.2a0918b1@toshi
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
On 20/10/14 01:09, Michael Gilbert wrote: The new isc-dhcp is now uploaded. Please let me know how your testing goes. After the upload of bind9/1:9.9.5.dfsg-5, this does seem to be working well now in sid d-i. Thanks. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 00:52, Steven Chamberlain wrote: Michael Gilbert wrote: Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat easy for porters to test? I don't particularly need that as I can build the udebs and d-i image from them myself. But doing so would allow others to be testing it meanwhile, so I'm okay with it. Did you already make a new version of the isc-dhcp package based on these new export udebs? If so, where can I find it? Hi Steven, The new isc-dhcp is now uploaded. Please let me know how your testing goes. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mpbb25ndu4q1udfxrh2cph3vfxhorfo6xk-jcxg3sa...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
On Mon, Oct 6, 2014 at 9:11 PM, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 00:52, Steven Chamberlain wrote: Michael Gilbert wrote: Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat easy for porters to test? I don't particularly need that as I can build the udebs and d-i image from them myself. But doing so would allow others to be testing it meanwhile, so I'm okay with it. Did you already make a new version of the isc-dhcp package based on these new export udebs? If so, where can I find it? No, not yet. Will probably get to that tomorrow. Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CANTw=MNmqCSH4fnnXCE80=f1Z3B1A+Y2F=1idn-tzifb9+x...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
Michael Gilbert wrote: On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: I'm not going to go through building this on a kfreebsd porterbox to try and figure out how isc-dhcp would look if rebuilt against such packages, but that looks a saner base for porters to build upon. That doesn't make the timing issues I've mentioned disappear though. I'm OK with thinking about it again if porters endorse/welcome/successfully test the resulting packages and installation images. I will try to find time to do this. Probably it is desirable, because it should reduce the overall size of udebs in the installer ramdisks? Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat easy for porters to test? I don't particularly need that as I can build the udebs and d-i image from them myself. But doing so would allow others to be testing it meanwhile, so I'm okay with it. Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141006235202.gg25...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org (2014-10-07): I will try to find time to do this. Probably it is desirable, because it should reduce the overall size of udebs in the installer ramdisks? I'm not sure how moving from an embedded code copy to shared libraries across several udebs but used by a single udeb is going to help reduce anything as far as size is concerned. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
On 00:52, Steven Chamberlain wrote: Michael Gilbert wrote: Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat easy for porters to test? I don't particularly need that as I can build the udebs and d-i image from them myself. But doing so would allow others to be testing it meanwhile, so I'm okay with it. Did you already make a new version of the isc-dhcp package based on these new export udebs? If so, where can I find it? Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141007011138.gi25...@squeeze.pyro.eu.org
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
On Sun, Oct 5, 2014 at 9:59 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: I'm not going to go through building this on a kfreebsd porterbox to try and figure out how isc-dhcp would look if rebuilt against such packages, but that looks a saner base for porters to build upon. That doesn't make the timing issues I've mentioned disappear though. I'm OK with thinking about it again if porters endorse/welcome/successfully test the resulting packages and installation images. Thanks for the feedback. Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat easy for porters to test? Best wishes, Mike -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/CANTw=mpb5cgpq1oe6d_vpsoggyk6o3y2bqrrxwba_ozlh6m...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Bug#762762: Updating isc-dhcp udeb to dynamically link bind (was: Bug#762762: nmu fixing bind issues)
Michael Gilbert mgilb...@debian.org (2014-10-05): Would it be ok to stage the changes in unstable to make it somewhat easy for porters to test? Since D-I Jessie Beta 2 is out I can't think of a reason why that wouldn't be a good idea. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
