Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Daily build aggregator debian-boot@lists.debian.org (2013-09-20): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: [ many ] We know there's apt's #723705, so I've decronned the build aggregator for now. Mraw, KiBi. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130920101546.ge15...@mraw.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On 17/09/13 00:15, Cyril Brulebois wrote: The Err issue while downloading some files (21: Is a directory) only appears on kfreebsd AFAICT, so might be an arch-specific issue. I saw it happen on Linux i386 too. I now realise the buildd log URIs are not valid for very long (could /daily/ become a 302 redirect to something more permanent?), but fortunately I quoted this in an email: http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_cdrom_gtk.log Err http://ftp.gr.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main/debian-installer xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-udeb i386 1:0.4.3-2 Could not open file /build/installer-yUDIZW/build/apt.udeb/cache/archives/partial/ - open (21: Is a directory) Err http://incoming.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main/debian-installer xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-udeb i386 1:0.4.3-2 Could not open file /build/installer-yUDIZW/build/apt.udeb/cache/archives/partial/ - open (21: Is a directory) Failed to fetch http://incoming.debian.org/debian/pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-fbdev/xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-udeb_0.4.3-2_i386.udeb Could not open file /build/installer-yUDIZW/build/apt.udeb/cache/archives/partial/ - open (21: Is a directory) And in the case of kfreebsd it was seen with a different mirror server (mirror-ubc). Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/52383a4a.20...@pyro.eu.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Cyril Brulebois k...@debian.org (2013-09-11): Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (2013-09-05): So, no mirror problem, fine. Then, what problem? I've just reproduced this issue locally (using make rebuild_netboot-gtk under build/). This doesn't appear to be related to the recent (last 2 months) apt updates, since I'm running 0.9.9.4 on this (slightly outdated) sid box. Looking at *Packages under build/apt.udeb/state, no acpi-* packages there. So I suspected a given Packages file could have been corrupted along the way. Switching to a different mirror in sources.list.udeb led to a download of the current file. Voluntarily breaking that Packages file (echo foo into it) gets totally unnoticed. It looks to me like there's no way to force apt to redownload InRelease and Packages files, since apt-get clean apt-get update don't do that. I'm tempted to just rm lists/* before calling apt-get update on the d-i side, to make sure index files are refreshed, no matter what. Looking at recent linux logs, it seems systemd's udev-udeb depending on libudev1 (instead of libudev1-udeb) is the thing breaking the build from now, so the issue apparently disappeared, at least for the time being. Once that's fixed, it should be trivial to see whether some udebs are still (considered) missing. Unfortunately, the logs that were partially pasted are now gone. From there, two things I'd like to sort out: - make d-i.d.o store more logs than just a handful. Those are text files, should be good to compress, so we probably could keep a whole year or so; I should be able to arrange something with DSA if storage becomes an issue. - make sure udebs are installable at all times (to catch such library / shlibs issue and the like as early as possible); that's probably just a matter of using edos-debcheck properly. I'll try to work on that this week. The Err issue while downloading some files (21: Is a directory) only appears on kfreebsd AFAICT, so might be an arch-specific issue. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
APT seems to be misbehaving on other architectures too: http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_netboot-xen.log Err http://ftp.gr.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main/debian-installer xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-udeb i386 1:0.4.3-2 Could not open file /build/installer-PBPsQ7/build/apt.udeb/cache/archives/partial/ - open (21: Is a directory) Instead of opening the output file, it tries to open the output directory for writing (as if the filename part is null). There is one place in code that tests for this: if (PkgFile.empty() == true) return _error-Error(_(The package index files are corrupted. No Filename: but I wouldn't be surprised if similar code is repeated elsewhere without this check; it suggests a corrupted package index. This code is pretty insane though. If StoreFilename is unset, it might try to stat the 'partial/' directory, realise it doesn't match the expected size of the .deb, and even try to unlink it. I notice within a 'fix cppcheck warnings' commit something alarming that looks like it would cause a functional change. http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=apt/apt.git;a=commitdiff;h=69c2ecbdc937e3c73fe67d3c9bce12a80d3ec7ec#patch2 - for (; Vf.end() == false; Vf++) + for (; Vf.end() == false; ++Vf) If that is some kind of iterator won't it now skip over the first element? Otherwise how did it ever work before? And confusingly, the same iterator is incremented if it gets to the end of that 'loop', in which case it could definitely skip over something, if the function is meant to be re-entrant. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5230d5c0.9000...@pyro.eu.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Hi, On 12/09/13 01:53, David Kalnischkies wrote: On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org wrote: Does this change seem odd to you too? I wondered if it could be causing recent failures of APT to download required debs for d-i builds: Looking at: http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log The only think I can see is that APT completes successfully and whatever comes after that can't find cdebconf-newt-terminal even though in the output of APT it is seen that it was downloaded. The acquire appeared successful in these cases at least - I guess we need to know exactly what's in the archives dir on the buildds: http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_gtk.log Needed cdebconf-newt-terminal not found (looked in apt.udeb/cache/archives/, debugudebs/) http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_netboot-gtk.log Needed speakup-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di not found (looked in apt.udeb/cache/archives/, debugudebs/) But this one is particularly interesting - this is why I suspected an APT bug such as StoreFilename being empty: http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_cdrom_gtk.log Err http://ftp.gr.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main/debian-installer xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-udeb i386 1:0.4.3-2 Could not open file /build/installer-yUDIZW/build/apt.udeb/cache/archives/partial/ - open (21: Is a directory) Err http://incoming.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main/debian-installer xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-udeb i386 1:0.4.3-2 Could not open file /build/installer-yUDIZW/build/apt.udeb/cache/archives/partial/ - open (21: Is a directory) Failed to fetch http://incoming.debian.org/debian/pool/main/x/xserver-xorg-video-fbdev/xserver-xorg-video-fbdev-udeb_0.4.3-2_i386.udeb Could not open file /build/installer-yUDIZW/build/apt.udeb/cache/archives/partial/ - open (21: Is a directory) And again on a completely different buildd, using a different mirror: http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_cdrom_gtk.log Err http://mirror-ubc.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main/debian-installer cdebconf-newt-udeb kfreebsd-amd64 0.185 Could not open file /build/installer-aXrvSw/checkout/build/apt.udeb/cache/archives/partial/ - open (21: Is a directory) [IP: 2607:f8f0:610:4000:6564:a62:ce0c:137e 80] Failed to fetch http://mirror-ubc.debian.org/debian/pool/main/c/cdebconf/cdebconf-newt-udeb_0.185_kfreebsd-amd64.udeb Could not open file /build/installer-aXrvSw/checkout/build/apt.udeb/cache/archives/partial/ - open (21: Is a directory) [IP: 2607:f8f0:610:4000:6564:a62:ce0c:137e 80] On 11/09/13 21:42, Steven Chamberlain wrote: - for (; Vf.end() == false; Vf++) + for (; Vf.end() == false; ++Vf) If that is some kind of iterator won't it now skip over the first element? Otherwise how did it ever work before? Did you recognize the first ; ? The value returned by the post-increase isn't stored or used for anything, so we can equally well use the pre-increment (as suggested by cppcheck), right? Sorry, of course, the return value isn't what's used within the loop. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/5231163d.4090...@pyro.eu.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (2013-09-05): So, no mirror problem, fine. Then, what problem? I've just reproduced this issue locally (using make rebuild_netboot-gtk under build/). This doesn't appear to be related to the recent (last 2 months) apt updates, since I'm running 0.9.9.4 on this (slightly outdated) sid box. Looking at *Packages under build/apt.udeb/state, no acpi-* packages there. So I suspected a given Packages file could have been corrupted along the way. Switching to a different mirror in sources.list.udeb led to a download of the current file. Voluntarily breaking that Packages file (echo foo into it) gets totally unnoticed. So I suspect Packages files got truncated at some point (maybe a dak glitch, a mirror sync issue, or whatever), and for some reasons apt isn't refreshing them. I haven't debugged that any further (yet). Mraw, KiBi. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130910225225.ga20...@mraw.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 07:02 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk): Still, this package seems to be provided by the linux source package. No, I haven't touched speakup. And in that log APT says: The following NEW packages will be installed: [...] sound-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di speakup-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di So, the problem might be with the mirror that is used by the build machine: Why? Get:1 http://ftp.gr.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main/debian-installer mouse-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di amd64 3.10.7-1 [34.7 kB] I wonder why a build machine is using a mirror in Greece. I'd bet the build machine is *not* in Greece. There are a bunch of debian.org machines hosted at GRNET in Greece... Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If you seem to know what you are doing, you'll be given more to do. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 07:02:06AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: I wonder why a build machine is using a mirror in Greece. I'd bet the build machine is *not* in Greece. Why? Because you think Greece has no money left to run buildds? http://db.debian.org/machines.cgi?host=barber Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk): On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 07:02 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk): Still, this package seems to be provided by the linux source package. No, I haven't touched speakup. And in that log APT says: The following NEW packages will be installed: [...] sound-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di speakup-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di So, the problem might be with the mirror that is used by the build machine: Why? Get:1 http://ftp.gr.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main/debian-installer mouse-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di amd64 3.10.7-1 [34.7 kB] Doh, I didn't pate enough lines: Get:1 http://ftp.gr.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main/debian-installer mouse-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di amd64 3.10.7-1 [34.7 kB] Fetched 34.7 kB in 0s (0 B/s) Download complete and in download only mode Needed speakup-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di not found (looked in apt.udeb/cache/archives/, debugudebs/) make[2]: *** [stamps/get_udebs-netboot-gtk-stamp] Error 1 I wonder why a build machine is using a mirror in Greece. I'd bet the build machine is *not* in Greece. There are a bunch of debian.org machines hosted at GRNET in Greece... Ah, I wasn't aware of this. So, ack...but, admitedly, there is something wrong on that mirror, am I right? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 07:00:13PM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk): On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 07:02 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk): Still, this package seems to be provided by the linux source package. No, I haven't touched speakup. And in that log APT says: The following NEW packages will be installed: [...] sound-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di speakup-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di So, the problem might be with the mirror that is used by the build machine: Why? Get:1 http://ftp.gr.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main/debian-installer mouse-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di amd64 3.10.7-1 [34.7 kB] Doh, I didn't pate enough lines: Get:1 http://ftp.gr.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main/debian-installer mouse-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di amd64 3.10.7-1 [34.7 kB] Fetched 34.7 kB in 0s (0 B/s) Download complete and in download only mode These messages are from APT. Needed speakup-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di not found (looked in apt.udeb/cache/archives/, debugudebs/) I don't think this is. make[2]: *** [stamps/get_udebs-netboot-gtk-stamp] Error 1 This obviously isn't. I wonder why a build machine is using a mirror in Greece. I'd bet the build machine is *not* in Greece. There are a bunch of debian.org machines hosted at GRNET in Greece... Ah, I wasn't aware of this. So, ack...but, admitedly, there is something wrong on that mirror, am I right? I don't think so. It seems like APT and the calling script disagree about where udebs should be downloaded to. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings We get into the habit of living before acquiring the habit of thinking. - Albert Camus -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130904181645.gf7...@decadent.org.uk
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Philipp Kern (pk...@debian.org): On Wed, Sep 04, 2013 at 07:02:06AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: I wonder why a build machine is using a mirror in Greece. I'd bet the build machine is *not* in Greece. Why? Because you think Greece has no money left to run buildds? Well, see earlier messages: I was obviously mistaken. So, my apologies to anybody who could have been offended by the supposed assumption such as the above one, but I'd prefer if the real issue is fixed. So, no mirror problem, fine. Then, what problem? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 07:00 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Sep 03 00:05 buildd@barber build_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_netboot-gtk.log Needed speakup-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di not found (looked in apt.udeb/cache/archives/, debugudebs/) Something related to recent modules reorganization in kernel packages? Still, this package seems to be provided by the linux source package. No, I haven't touched speakup. And in that log APT says: The following NEW packages will be installed: [...] sound-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di speakup-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di Ben. -- Ben Hutchings If you seem to know what you are doing, you'll be given more to do. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Ben Hutchings (b...@decadent.org.uk): Still, this package seems to be provided by the linux source package. No, I haven't touched speakup. And in that log APT says: The following NEW packages will be installed: [...] sound-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di speakup-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di So, the problem might be with the mirror that is used by the build machine: Get:1 http://ftp.gr.debian.org/debian/ unstable/main/debian-installer mouse-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di amd64 3.10.7-1 [34.7 kB] I wonder why a build machine is using a mirror in Greece. I'd bet the build machine is *not* in Greece. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Sep 03 00:05 buildd@barber build_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_netboot-gtk.log Needed speakup-modules-3.10-2-amd64-di not found (looked in apt.udeb/cache/archives/, debugudebs/) Something related to recent modules reorganization in kernel packages? Still, this package seems to be provided by the linux source package. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * OLD BUILD:ia64 May 26 00:12 buildd@alkman build_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/ia64/daily/build_cdrom.log * OLD BUILD:ia64 May 26 00:16 buildd@alkman build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/ia64/daily/build_netboot.log \o/ We're onlyleft with these guys. Less noise. Good. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: Is there anything I can do (understand: something a dumb bubulle cacn do) to fix these recurrent build failures? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org (09/06/2013): Is there anything I can do (understand: something a dumb bubulle cacn do) to fix these recurrent build failures? Thanks for you offer. :) Unfortunately, one of the blockers is getting a linux kernel built everywhere. Currently, linux-image-3.9-1-$arch is lacking on: armel, s390*. This is in the kernel team's hands. (And one of the reasons why I didn't look too much into it, besides putting up [1] to complement [2].) 1. http://d-i.debian.org/kernel-summary.html 2. https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=linuxsuite=sid Besides missing linux kernel builds, kfreebsd-* had some troubles with autobuilding; Christoph kindly did the needed bits to get them back, and the failure is now on both archs: | # Generate grub2pxe | grub-mkimage -O i386-pc --prefix=(pxe)/debian-installer/kfreebsd-amd64 \ | -o ./tmp/netboot-gtk-9/dir_tree/core.img \ | bsd cpuid echo gfxterm gzio minicmd normal png vbe pxe pxecmd | grub-mkimage: error: cannot stat `/usr/lib/grub/i386-pc/pxecmd.mod': No such file or directory. I'm not sure this one got reported. Feel free to do so. ia64 is lacking d-i autobuilding those days, but not only that: Andreas is trying to restore ia64 autobuilding at all. I'm not sure this is a priority anyway, given ia64 is likely to go away for jessie. On the sparc side, sparc64 bits were dropped (see [1] above), I didn't investigate yet whether that's intentional on the kernel side, and what to do on the d-i side. Feel free to get in touch with kernel + sparc people once you've checked linux's changelog. Given all the above, I didn't check the debian-cd builds at all yet. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Daily build aggregator debian-boot@lists.debian.org (21/05/2013): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * OLD BUILD:amd64 May 19 00:05 buildd@barber build_cdrom_isolinux http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log * FAILED BUILD: amd64 bMay 19 00:05/b buildd@barber build_cdrom_isolinux http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log I guess the aggregator could be a little smarter and strip html tags; the real issue anyway is that while cleaning up some checkout dirs on ravel, I failed to think about the forced command used to upload build logs (~/.ssh/authorized_keys). Now switched this way: - /org/d-i.debian.org/scripts/buildd-forced-command + /home/d-i/trunk/scripts/buildd-forced-command Hopefully we'll get logs again next night, possibly successful for most of them (excluding powerpc on which linux currently fails to build). Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Hi Christoph, Is there a problem with buildd fano? On 23/03/13 01:00, Daily build aggregator wrote: Failed or old builds: * OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-amd64 Mar 21 00:35 buildd@fano build_cdrom_grub http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_cdrom_grub.log [...] Also package tilda is in 'Building' state on that buildd for 2+ days which seems unlikely... https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=tildasuite=experimental Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/514df62b.9070...@pyro.eu.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Hi! Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org writes: Is there a problem with buildd fano? There was som fun recently at UBC (where fano and finzi lieve) and later on the local package mirror there died so if things are now fine again, don't worry. On 23/03/13 01:00, Daily build aggregator wrote: Failed or old builds: * OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-amd64 Mar 21 00:35 buildd@fano build_cdrom_grub http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_cdrom_grub.log [...] Also package tilda is in 'Building' state on that buildd for 2+ days which seems unlikely... https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=tildasuite=experimental I don't have anything specific in mind which could have caused this (maybe fano couldn't connect to grieg for a while due to trouble there?). I've now requeued the build we'll see what happens Christoph -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87d2uqhqtp@mitoraj.siccegge.de
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 18 21:17 debian-cd@pettersson 2sidsource http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2sidsource * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 18 21:17 debian-cd@pettersson 2wheezysource http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2wheezysource Local build testing, ignore... -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com It's actually quite entertaining to watch ag129 prop his foot up on the desk so he can get a better aim. [ seen in ucam.chat ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u7clg-0001ks...@mail.einval.com
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Hello, 2013/2/3 Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org: It seems that the build deamon (ancina) that was building the d-i images for armel is currently down. Do you have any updates on what's happening or could you please move the build to another host if the failure is expected to last longer. ancina has been down, it is now up and back building d-i. Cheers, -- Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAODfWeH0ObHUe9e=-qd6r6y--gto3grn7k9bvzd1somrzhl...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Hi Hector Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com writes: Hello, 2013/2/3 Gaudenz Steinlin gaud...@debian.org: It seems that the build deamon (ancina) that was building the d-i images for armel is currently down. Do you have any updates on what's happening or could you please move the build to another host if the failure is expected to last longer. ancina has been down, it is now up and back building d-i. Thanks for working on this. Best, Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87obfzawxi@meteor.durcheinandertal.bofh
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Dear armel buildd maintainers It seems that the build deamon (ancina) that was building the d-i images for armel is currently down. Do you have any updates on what's happening or could you please move the build to another host if the failure is expected to last longer. The last d-i build happened on Jan 28, see below. Since then new information about attempted, failed or succsessful builds are available anymore. Gaudenz Daily build aggregator debian-boot@lists.debian.org writes: Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * OLD BUILD:armel Jan 28 08:08 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:armel Jan 28 08:10 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_network-console_glantank http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_glantank.log * OLD BUILD:armel Jan 28 08:13 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_network-console_n2100 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_n2100.log * OLD BUILD:armel Jan 28 08:16 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_network-console_ss4000e http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_ss4000e.log * OLD BUILD:armel Jan 28 08:18 buildd@ancina build_kirkwood_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:armel Jan 28 08:23 buildd@ancina build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk.log * OLD BUILD:armel Jan 28 08:25 buildd@ancina build_kirkwood_network-console http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_network-console.log * OLD BUILD:armel Jan 28 08:28 buildd@ancina build_orion5x_network-console http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_orion5x_network-console.log * OLD BUILD:armel Jan 28 08:31 buildd@ancina build_versatile_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_versatile_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:armel Jan 28 08:33 buildd@ancina build_ads_cf http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_ads_cf.log * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jan 30 01:17 debian-cd@pettersson sidamd64 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/sidamd64 Totals: 105 builds (1 failed, 10 old) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1u1nwc-0005sl...@ravel.debian.org -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/87k3qpip1j@meteor.durcheinandertal.bofh
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 07:41:27PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 18/01/13 19:36, Philipp Kern wrote: rem% ls -al ~buildd/ ls: cannot access /home/buildd/: No such file or directory Oh. Could a /home partition or network share be not mounted? The machines database still calls it a mipsel buildd, and before the outage it was responsible for the nightly d-i builds on that arch. Disk space:40g+120g sounds to me like /home might be the 120 GB disk. I just logged in, the hostkey changed. It seems that a buildd's running again and d-i.debian.org has recent daily builds. So that's probably solved. Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Le 22/01/2013 12:11, Philipp Kern a écrit : On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 07:41:27PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 18/01/13 19:36, Philipp Kern wrote: rem% ls -al ~buildd/ ls: cannot access /home/buildd/: No such file or directory Oh. Could a /home partition or network share be not mounted? The machines database still calls it a mipsel buildd, and before the outage it was responsible for the nightly d-i builds on that arch. Disk space:40g+120g sounds to me like /home might be the 120 GB disk. I just logged in, the hostkey changed. It seems that a buildd's running again and d-i.debian.org has recent daily builds. So that's probably solved. Yes. It's been a couple of days since the last failure. But, as usual, one never notices when things are again working as expected..:-) Thanks for your followup on this, Phil. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50fe8699.5000...@debian.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Hi, On Dienstag, 22. Januar 2013, Christian Perrier wrote: Yes. It's been a couple of days since the last failure. But, as usual, one never notices when things are again working as expected..:-) there is a jenkins job checking this: http://jenkins.debian.net/view/d-i_misc/job/d-i_parse_build_logs/ it will notice when problems are gone and can easily configured to send mail too. currently that job is still marked unstable as no armel builds from today are available. cheers, Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201301221621.24251.hol...@layer-acht.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
In article e1txoh9-pc...@ravel.debian.org you write: Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jan 22 22:57 debian-cd@pettersson sidamd64 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/sidamd64 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jan 22 22:57 debian-cd@pettersson Asidamd64 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/Asidamd64 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jan 22 22:57 debian-cd@pettersson 5sidamd64 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/5sidamd64 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jan 22 22:57 debian-cd@pettersson 4sidamd64 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/4sidamd64 Ignore these, that's me doing development/testing on pettersson. -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com We're the technical experts. We were hired so that management could ignore our recommendations and tell us how to do our jobs. -- Mike Andrews -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1txp9h-0005k3...@mail.einval.com
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On 18/01/13 07:03, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: On 18/01/13 05:49, Christian PERRIER wrote: Are there any news? We apparently had no D-I build for mipsel since Jan 10th. rem is back since Monday. Thanks Martin, Please could mipsel porters or wb-team see why the nightly d-i builds on rem.debian.org are not running? Thanks, Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50f998f6.9060...@pyro.eu.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 06:48:22PM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: On 18/01/13 07:03, Martin Zobel-Helas wrote: On 18/01/13 05:49, Christian PERRIER wrote: Are there any news? We apparently had no D-I build for mipsel since Jan 10th. rem is back since Monday. Thanks Martin, Please could mipsel porters or wb-team see why the nightly d-i builds on rem.debian.org are not running? There's no buildd on rem anymore. bui...@rem.debian.org SMTP error from remote mail server after RCPT TO:bui...@rem.debian.org: host rem.debian.org [2001:41b8:202:deb:202:4cff:fefe:d06]: 550 Unrouteable address rem% ls -al ~buildd/ ls: cannot access /home/buildd/: No such file or directory Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On 18/01/13 19:36, Philipp Kern wrote: rem% ls -al ~buildd/ ls: cannot access /home/buildd/: No such file or directory Oh. Could a /home partition or network share be not mounted? The machines database still calls it a mipsel buildd, and before the outage it was responsible for the nightly d-i builds on that arch. Disk space:40g+120g sounds to me like /home might be the 120 GB disk. Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50f9a567.3010...@pyro.eu.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Martin Zobel-Helas (zo...@ftbfs.de): Strangely the logs do not make the error obvious, at least to me. Isn't that the old build log? From when the last build happened, i.e. no error? i needed to shut down some hardware at our hosting MAN-DA due to an error in the air conditioning, to prevent the room from overheating. I will investigate, why it did not come back properly. Hello Martin, Are there any news? We apparently had no D-I build for mipsel since Jan 10th. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
rem is back since Monday. Christian PERRIER bubu...@debian.org schrieb: Quoting Martin Zobel-Helas (zo...@ftbfs.de): Strangely the logs do not make the error obvious, at least to me. Isn't that the old build log? From when the last build happened, i.e. no error? i needed to shut down some hardware at our hosting MAN-DA due to an error in the air conditioning, to prevent the room from overheating. I will investigate, why it did not come back properly. Hello Martin, Are there any news? We apparently had no D-I build for mipsel since Jan 10th. -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Hi, On 13/01/13 06:41, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): * OLD BUILD:mipsel Jan 10 00:10 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log That's two days in a row. We should begin to worry..:-) It looks like the usual d-i buildd 'rem' is down (since Thurs/Fri). So I'm also Cc:'ing DSA: PING rem.debian.org (82.195.75.68) 56(84) bytes of data. From carp25.gw-manda.debian.org (82.195.78.118) icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable Strangely the logs do not make the error obvious, at least to me. Isn't that the old build log? From when the last build happened, i.e. no error? Regards, -- Steven Chamberlain ste...@pyro.eu.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/50f2eaaf.1070...@pyro.eu.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Hi, On Sun Jan 13, 2013 at 17:11:11 +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: Hi, On 13/01/13 06:41, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): * OLD BUILD:mipsel Jan 10 00:10 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log That's two days in a row. We should begin to worry..:-) It looks like the usual d-i buildd 'rem' is down (since Thurs/Fri). So I'm also Cc:'ing DSA: PING rem.debian.org (82.195.75.68) 56(84) bytes of data. From carp25.gw-manda.debian.org (82.195.78.118) icmp_seq=1 Destination Host Unreachable Strangely the logs do not make the error obvious, at least to me. Isn't that the old build log? From when the last build happened, i.e. no error? i needed to shut down some hardware at our hosting MAN-DA due to an error in the air conditioning, to prevent the room from overheating. I will investigate, why it did not come back properly. Cheers, Martin -- Martin Zobel-Helas zo...@debian.org | Debian System Administrator Debian GNU/Linux Developer | Debian Listmaster GPG key http://go.debian.net/B11B627B |Debian Webmaster GPG Fingerprint: 6B18 5642 8E41 EC89 3D5D BDBB 53B1 AC6D B11B 627B -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130113171621.gb30...@ftbfs.de
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Steven Chamberlain (ste...@pyro.eu.org): Hi, On 13/01/13 06:41, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): * OLD BUILD:mipsel Jan 10 00:10 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log That's two days in a row. We should begin to worry..:-) It looks like the usual d-i buildd 'rem' is down (since Thurs/Fri). So I'm also Cc:'ing DSA: You're right.I overread the OLD BUILD part that doesn't mention a failed build but a failure to have a recent one. zobel gave the right explanation, that's fine. Thanks for your help dealing with this. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * OLD BUILD:mipsel Jan 10 00:10 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log That's two days in a row. We should begin to worry..:-) Strangely the logs do not make the error obvious, at least to me. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Nov 03 00:20 buildd@barber build_hd-media http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_hd-media.log * FAILED BUILD: i386 Nov 03 00:17 buildd@biber build_hd-media http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_hd-media.log Both fail with: .../... rm -rf ./tmp/hd-media/syslinux/* mkdir -p ./tmp/hd-media/syslinux TYPE=standard INCLUDE_GTK=dest/hd-media/gtk/initrd.gz DESKTOP= \ syslinux-cfgs boot/x86 ./tmp/hd-media/syslinux mkfs.msdos -i deb1 -n Debian Inst -C ./tmp/hd-media/boot.img 976562 mkfs.msdos 3.0.13 (30 Jun 2012) # syslinux is used to make the image bootable syslinux ./tmp/hd-media/boot.img mcopy -i./tmp/hd-media/boot.img ./tmp/hd-media/vmlinuz ::linux Total number of sectors (1953124) not a multiple of sectors per track (32)! Add mtools_skip_check=1 to your .mtoolsrc file to skip this test signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Hello, we've received this: Daily build aggregator debian-boot@lists.debian.org (05/09/2012): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: s390 Sep 05 00:01 buildd@zandonai build_generic http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390/daily/build_generic.log Totals: 135 builds (1 failed, 0 old) The log has: | dpkg-deb: error: unable to create temporary directory: No space left on device I thought I'd let you know if you didn't already. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: This failed builds are due to the newly uploaded hw-detect having pending changes that were requiring udpkg 1.14. However, that version of udpkg was not yet uploaded, which is what I'm doing right now. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Hi, 2012/5/18 Daily build aggregator debian-boot@lists.debian.org: * OLD BUILD: armel May 08 08:10 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log Apologies guys, but ancina.d.o doing d-i dailies is down. We are trying to contact local admin to get it back as soon as possible, but that might take a while. Cheers, -- Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAODfWeGyTmwBAThVqBJ_6i+=-mb_sqjzjebd_-rdrqjwcpi...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 07:38:52AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org): On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 08:40:38 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: Duno if this is a transient problem or something we should care about in deep. It's not, and you should. Nobody did, as of now. I'm on holidays right now, with few time (and the remaining time left for other tasks in Debian) so if anybody would like to have a look at this problem, it could be a good idea. Julien filed a bug. Kind regards Philipp Kern signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 10:50:37 +0200, Philipp Kern wrote: On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 07:38:52AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org): On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 08:40:38 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: Duno if this is a transient problem or something we should care about in deep. It's not, and you should. Nobody did, as of now. I'm on holidays right now, with few time (and the remaining time left for other tasks in Debian) so if anybody would like to have a look at this problem, it could be a good idea. Julien filed a bug. Fixed in http://git.gnome.org/browse/glib/commit/?id=8db824e00b69302dafed9ceddd6f34abf5202516 and in glib2.0 2.32.2-1. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Julien Cristau (jcris...@debian.org): On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 08:40:38 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: Duno if this is a transient problem or something we should care about in deep. It's not, and you should. Nobody did, as of now. I'm on holidays right now, with few time (and the remaining time left for other tasks in Debian) so if anybody would like to have a look at this problem, it could be a good idea. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: Seem to be caused by this: Building dependency tree... Installing libc6-udeb as Depends of libasound2-udeb libglib2.0-udeb:i386 Depends on libelf1 [ i386 ] none ( none ) (= 0.132) can't be satisfied! Installing libslang2-udeb as Depends of cdebconf-newt-udeb Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable distribution that some required packages have not yet been created or been moved out of Incoming. The following information may help to resolve the situation: The following packages have unmet dependencies: libglib2.0-udeb : Depends: libelf1 (= 0.132) but it is not installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages. Duno if this is a transient problem or something we should care about in deep. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 08:40:38 +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: Duno if this is a transient problem or something we should care about in deep. It's not, and you should. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Please do not send bug reports --- On 3 Mar 2012 at 1:00, Daily build aggregator wrote: Date sent: Sat, 03 Mar 2012 01:00:03 + To: debian-boot@lists.debian.org Subject:Debian installer build: failed or old builds From: Daily build aggregator debian- b...@lists.debian.org Forwarded by: debian-boot@lists.debian.org Date forwarded: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 01:18:09 + (UTC) [ Double-click this line for list subscription options ] Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: armel Mar 02 06:07 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily- images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Mar 02 06:08 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_network-console_glantank http://d-i.debian.org/daily- images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_glantank.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Mar 02 06:09 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_network-console_n2100 http://d-i.debian.org/daily- images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_n2100.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Mar 02 06:10 buildd@ancina build_iop32x_network-console_ss4000e http://d-i.debian.org/daily- images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_ss4000e.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Mar 02 06:10 buildd@ancina build_kirkwood_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily- images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Mar 02 06:12 buildd@ancina build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily- images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Mar 02 06:12 buildd@ancina build_kirkwood_network-console http://d-i.debian.org/daily- images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_network-console.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Mar 02 06:13 buildd@ancina build_orion5x_network-console http://d-i.debian.org/daily- images/armel/daily/build_orion5x_network-console.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Mar 02 06:14 buildd@ancina build_versatile_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily- images/armel/daily/build_versatile_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: armel Mar 02 06:15 buildd@ancina build_ads_cf http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_ads_cf.log * FAILED BUILD: i386 Mar 03 00:03 buildd@biber build_cdrom_isolinux http://d-i.debian.org/daily- images/i386/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log * FAILED BUILD: i386 Mar 03 00:04 buildd@biber build_cdrom_gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_cdrom_gtk.log * FAILED BUILD: i386 Mar 03 00:05 buildd@biber build_cdrom-xen http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_cdrom-xen.log * FAILED BUILD: i386 Mar 03 00:13 buildd@biber build_hd-media http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_hd-media.log * FAILED BUILD: i386 Mar 03 00:14 buildd@biber build_hd-media_gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/build_hd- media_gtk.log * FAILED BUILD: ia64 Mar 03 00:13 buildd@alkman build_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/ia64/daily/build_cdrom.log * FAILED BUILD: ia64 Mar 03 00:14 buildd@alkman build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/ia64/daily/build_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: mips Mar 03 00:10 buildd@lucatelli build_malta_netboot- 2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_malta_netboot- 2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mips Mar 03 00:11 buildd@lucatelli build_r4k- ip22_cdrom-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_r4k- ip22_cdrom-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mips Mar 03 00:12 buildd@lucatelli build_r4k- ip22_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_r4k- ip22_netboot-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mips Mar 03 00:14 buildd@lucatelli build_r5k- ip32_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_r5k- ip32_netboot-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mips Mar 03 00:16 buildd@lucatelli build_sb1- bcm91250a_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_sb1- bcm91250a_netboot-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mips Mar 03 00:18 buildd@lucatelli build_miniiso http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_miniiso.log * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Mar 03 00:07 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot- 2.6_serial http://d-i.debian.org/daily- images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Mar 03 00:08 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot- 2.6_ssh http://d-i.debian.org/daily- images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_ssh.log * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Mar 03 00:09 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot- 2.6_common http://d-i.debian.org/daily-
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Miguel Figueiredo (el...@debianpt.org): i386 failing with: cp: cannot stat `/org/cdbuilder.debian.org/src/deb-cd/d-i/d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/cdrom/initrd.gz': No such file or directory FAILED: error 1 Failed to start disc 1, error 256 make: *** [image-trees] Error 9 I assume this is #657560 in apt, where Didier Rabourd raised the severity because it affects D-I builds signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
i386 failing with: cp: cannot stat `/org/cdbuilder.debian.org/src/deb-cd/d-i/d-i.debian.org/daily-images/i386/daily/cdrom/initrd.gz': No such file or directory FAILED: error 1 Failed to start disc 1, error 256 make: *** [image-trees] Error 9 ...and amd64 failing with: E: Unable to locate package ide-core-modules-3.2.0-1-486-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'ide-core-modules-3.2.0-1-486-di' E: Unable to locate package ide-modules-3.2.0-1-486-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'ide-modules-3.2.0-1-486-di' make[4]: *** [stamps/get_udebs-cdrom_gtk-stamp] Error 100 make[3]: *** [_build] Error 2 make[2]: *** [build_cdrom_gtk] Error 2 make[1]: *** [_build] Error 2 make: *** [build_cdrom_isolinux] Error 2 -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4f53c34e.5070...@debianpt.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: Houston, we have a problem. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 07:16:37AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: Houston, we have a problem. Hopefully, this will be fixed by http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=d-i/debian-installer.git;a=commitdiff;h=3d1a7e02fc08a65a21d8181c30db3d20035698d2 Best regards, -- Jurij Smakov ju...@wooyd.org Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120123213553.ga9...@wooyd.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
A Terça, 18 de Outubro de 2011 02:00:04 Daily build aggregator você escreveu: Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 Oct 18 00:11 buildd@fano build_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_cdrom.log * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 Oct 18 00:12 buildd@fano build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 Oct 18 00:13 buildd@fano build_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_netboot-gtk. log Fails with: E: Unable to locate package acpi-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'acpi-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di' E: Unable to locate package cdrom-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'cdrom-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di' E: Unable to locate package ext2-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'ext2-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di' E: Unable to locate package fat-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'fat-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di' E: Unable to locate package floppy-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'floppy-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di' E: Unable to locate package isofs-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'isofs-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di' E: Unable to locate package kernel-image-8.1-1-amd64-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'kernel-image-8.1-1-amd64-di' E: Unable to locate package mmc-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'mmc-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di' E: Unable to locate package ntfs-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'ntfs-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di' E: Unable to locate package nullfs-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'nullfs-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di' E: Unable to locate package reiserfs-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'reiserfs-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di' E: Unable to locate package sata-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'sata-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di' E: Unable to locate package scsi-extra-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'scsi-extra-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di' E: Unable to locate package scsi-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'scsi-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di' E: Unable to locate package xfs-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'xfs-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di' E: Unable to locate package zfs-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'zfs-modules-8.1-1-amd64-di' make[2]: *** [stamps/get_udebs-cdrom-stamp] Error 100 make[1]: *** [_build] Error 2 make: *** [build_cdrom] Error 2 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Oct 17 22:12 debian-cd@pettersson 1sidkfreebsd-amd64 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/1sidkfreebsd-amd64 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Oct 17 22:12 debian-cd@pettersson 2sidkfreebsd-amd64 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2sidkfreebsd-amd64 Totals: 107 builds (5 failed, 0 old) Fails with: (Optionally) making the image bootable for kfreebsd-amd64: Running tools/boot/sid/boot-kfreebsd-amd64 1 /org/cdbuilder.debian.org/src/deb-cd/tmp/1sidkfreebsd-amd64/wheezy/CD1 Using images from /org/cdbuilder.debian.org/src/deb-cd/d-i/d- i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/ cp: cannot stat `/org/cdbuilder.debian.org/src/deb-cd/d-i/d- i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily//cdrom/debian-cd_info.tar.gz': No such file or directory FAILED: error 1 Failed to start disc 1, error 256 make: *** [image-trees] Error 9 Anyone has a clue on this? -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best Regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201110182030.54251.el...@debianpt.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 19:00, Hector Oron hector.o...@gmail.com wrote: I really fail to see what's wrong on this build and also the cdimage ones. Is daily build aggregator playing with us? :-) The log seems incomplete. Maybe space constraints in the builder? -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkrvzxfcjervpq1b5cygqvpvp826-tbn4qfqnf_npux...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Hello, 2011/8/30 Daily build aggregator debian-boot@lists.debian.org: Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: armel Aug 29 06:18 buildd@ancina build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_kirkwood_netboot-gtk.log I really fail to see what's wrong on this build and also the cdimage ones. Is daily build aggregator playing with us? :-) Cheers, -- Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAODfWeG=elu9pypyhemovncuark_edb0vkbggy524rv0-on...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: My fault..:-)... I anticipated the renaming of ttf-farsiweb-udeb to fonts-farsiweb-udebbut the new package is waiting in NEW. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Philipp Kern (pk...@debian.org): On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 10:34:25AM +0100, Hector Oron wrote: d-i autobuilding already moved to ancina, we just need someone with enough permissions (Phil or Christian) to set the ssh key exchange at ravel.d.o I added it, please test. It seems that no build landed yet: d-i@ravel:/srv/d-i.debian.org/bin$ ls -l /srv/d-i.debian.org/www/daily-images/armel total 40 drwxr-xr-x 8 d-i d-i 4096 May 10 21:49 20110510-21:50 drwxr-xr-x 7 d-i d-i 4096 May 31 16:38 20110531-16:38 drwxr-xr-x 7 d-i d-i 4096 Jun 4 16:49 20110604-16:49 drwxr-sr-x 7 d-i d-i 4096 Jun 30 19:14 20110630-19:14 drwxr-sr-x 7 d-i d-i 4096 Jul 1 19:14 20110701-19:14 drwxr-sr-x 7 d-i d-i 4096 Jul 21 17:57 20110721-17:57 drwxr-sr-x 7 d-i d-i 4096 Jul 23 17:56 20110723-17:56 drwxr-sr-x 7 d-i d-i 4096 Jul 30 17:56 20110730-17:56 drwxr-sr-x 7 d-i d-i 4096 Aug 7 17:59 20110807-17:59 drwxr-sr-x 7 d-i d-i 4096 Aug 9 17:57 20110809-17:57 lrwxrwxrwx 1 d-i d-i 14 Aug 9 17:58 daily - 20110809-17:57 signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * OLD BUILD:armel Aug 09 17:32 buildd@alain build_iop32x_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/armel/daily/build_iop32x_netboot.log Ring, ring, knock, knock... signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Colin Watson (cjwat...@debian.org): Does anyone know what's going on here? The logs show: debian-installer git tree head: e93d4f4b527c4a85e81a06fb0a8c6fc0536ae37d ... which is from 15 July. Clearly the build tree isn't getting updated for some reason, but I don't know why or where to look to find out. I asked numerous times here I also CC'ed mip...@build.debian.org. And no real answer came out. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 01:00:03AM +, Daily build aggregator wrote: * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Aug 12 00:06 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Aug 12 00:06 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_ssh http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_ssh.log * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Aug 12 00:07 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_common http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_common.log * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Aug 12 00:07 buildd@rem build_malta_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_malta_netboot-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Aug 12 00:08 buildd@rem build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_sb1-bcm91250a_netboot-2.6.log * FAILED BUILD: mipsel Aug 12 00:08 buildd@rem build_loongson-2f_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_loongson-2f_netboot-2.6.log Does anyone know what's going on here? The logs show: debian-installer git tree head: e93d4f4b527c4a85e81a06fb0a8c6fc0536ae37d ... which is from 15 July. Clearly the build tree isn't getting updated for some reason, but I don't know why or where to look to find out. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110812235113.ga21...@riva.dynamic.greenend.org.uk
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 03:00, Daily build aggregator debian-boot@lists.debian.org wrote: Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Jul 30 00:05 buildd@barber build_cdrom_isolinux http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/amd64/daily/build_cdrom_isolinux.log Do someone has any idea what's going on here? I built those fine in my machine... -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cap9odkp9f392zcjqwu5muxwrmtkzx+iws8nhh32fxjd0q+e...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * OLD BUILD:mipsel Jun 30 00:08 buildd@rem build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mipsel/daily/build_cobalt_netboot-2.6_serial.log Aha, our good old Daily build aggregator friend reminds us that it is still alive...:-) Maybe just a few hiccups on remor maybe something more worrying to be looked at by mipsel buildd admins let's wait until tomorrow to see if things fix up by themselves or if a human needs to wave some magic wand. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Hi, 2011/6/27 Daily build aggregator debian-boot@lists.debian.org: * OLD BUILD: armel Jun 21 18:50 buildd@alain build_iop32x_netboot Some issues with alain.d.o prevented this to be fixed sooner, should be fixed by today. Best regards, -- Héctor Orón -.. . -... .. .- -. -.. . ...- . .-.. --- .--. . .-. free spam -- Would you like to make a donation for Debian Conference? ** http://debconf11.debconf.org/payments.xhtml ** /free spam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/BANLkTi=ug7geydbnnnuu+ekuxmuhunt...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Daily build aggregator wrote: Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-amd64 (…) * FAILED BUILD: kfreebsd-i386 (…) I plea guilty for those two: I uploaded win32-loader 0.7.2 yesterday and it has obviously not yet propagated to all mirrors. Additionnally, I added a versioned build-dependency, to ensure that the used win32-loader does indeed support to be launched from kFreeBSD CDs. If the mirrors propagation goes well, it will be fixed by tomorrow (eh, I hope). Cheers, OdyX -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/itevls$jv6$1...@dough.gmane.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: For those who care: that was a manual run... signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 06:59:35AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: hppa May 19 06:00 didaily@c3700 build_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_cdrom.log * FAILED BUILD: hppa May 19 06:01 didaily@c3700 build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: hppa May 19 06:01 didaily@c3700 build_miniiso http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_miniiso.log HPPA porters, could you have a look at this? By the way, is there still a reason to keep an hppa autobuilder now that hppa has been moved to debian-ports? For d-i, probably not - I've powered-down said box. Thanks for the notification. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110524140855.ga14...@dannf.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: hppa May 19 06:00 didaily@c3700 build_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_cdrom.log * FAILED BUILD: hppa May 19 06:01 didaily@c3700 build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_netboot.log * FAILED BUILD: hppa May 19 06:01 didaily@c3700 build_miniiso http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_miniiso.log HPPA porters, could you have a look at this? By the way, is there still a reason to keep an hppa autobuilder now that hppa has been moved to debian-ports? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On 2011-05-11, Daily build aggregator debian-boot@lists.debian.org wrote: Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * OLD BUILD:s390 May 01 00:03 buildd@zandonai build_generic http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390/daily/build_generic.log * OLD BUILD:s390 May 01 00:03 buildd@zandonai build_tape http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390/daily/build_tape.log Insufficient extends free in the LVM volume group, as always. Fixed now. Kind regards Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrniskke6.pg8.tr...@kelgar.0x539.de
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Insufficient extends free in the LVM volume group, as always. Fixed now. Oh, great. /me crosses fingers for a completely error-free daily build for the next day...:-) Thanks for all this work, Phil. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Sun, Mar 06, 2011 at 05:32:49PM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting dann frazier (da...@dannf.org): And how about hppa builds? IIRC, hppa is now only supported in unstable, so that may explain why D-I daily builds are no longer run. Am I right? oops - powered down my hppa box before i went out of town. It should be back up daily buildin' again. Thanks for the poke. As of today, we still have reports of old builds for hppa... * OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:06 didaily@c3700 build_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_cdrom.log * OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:10 didaily@c3700 build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:14 didaily@c3700 build_miniiso http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_miniiso.log oops, how about now? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110307154912.gb25...@dannf.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting dann frazier (da...@dannf.org): oops, how about now? You made it. Thanks, Dann.. Now we only have to sort out the issue with mipsel and everything will be fine again. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting dann frazier (da...@dannf.org): And how about hppa builds? IIRC, hppa is now only supported in unstable, so that may explain why D-I daily builds are no longer run. Am I right? oops - powered down my hppa box before i went out of town. It should be back up daily buildin' again. Thanks for the poke. As of today, we still have reports of old builds for hppa... * OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:06 didaily@c3700 build_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_cdrom.log * OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:10 didaily@c3700 build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:14 didaily@c3700 build_miniiso http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_miniiso.log signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Fri, Mar 04, 2011 at 08:51:08AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: armel Mar 03 23:16 joey@box build_orion5x_network-console http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_orion5x_network-console.log * OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:06 didaily@c3700 build_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_cdrom.log * OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:10 didaily@c3700 build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:14 didaily@c3700 build_miniiso http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_miniiso.log And how about hppa builds? IIRC, hppa is now only supported in unstable, so that may explain why D-I daily builds are no longer run. Am I right? oops - powered down my hppa box before i went out of town. It should be back up daily buildin' again. Thanks for the poke. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110304221722.ga1...@dannf.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): * daily mipsel images build: The build daemon responsible for these builds is currently moving to a new hosting location. Daily builds should be available again within the first two weeks of 2011. Is this still true? We maybe want to update this notice.:-) signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: armel Mar 03 23:16 joey@box build_orion5x_network-console http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_orion5x_network-console.log * OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:06 didaily@c3700 build_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_cdrom.log * OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:10 didaily@c3700 build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:14 didaily@c3700 build_miniiso http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_miniiso.log And how about hppa builds? IIRC, hppa is now only supported in unstable, so that may explain why D-I daily builds are no longer run. Am I right? signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Hi, A Sexta 25 Fevereiro 2011 01:00:03 Daily build aggregator você escreveu: [...] * FAILED BUILD: s390 Feb 25 00:02 buildd@zandonai build_generic http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390/daily/build_generic.log * FAILED BUILD: s390 Feb 25 00:02 buildd@zandonai build_tape http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390/daily/build_tape.log I suspect this is due to the recent kernel transition in d-i: E: Unable to locate package dasd-modules-2.6.37-1-s390x-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'dasd-modules-2.6.37-1-s390x-di' E: Unable to locate package kernel-image-2.6.37-1-s390x-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'kernel-image-2.6.37-1-s390x-di' E: Unable to locate package nic-modules-2.6.37-1-s390x-di E: Couldn't find any package by regex 'nic-modules-2.6.37-1-s390x-di' [...] -- Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards, Miguel Figueiredo http://www.DebianPT.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201102250806.08751.el...@debianpt.org
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Thanks to the action of the kfreebsd porters, the situation of D-I builds improved significantly. We should now try to get status about other things mentioned in this daily report: - hppa: if I'm correct, this arch is not longer a release arch. As a consequence, there doesn't seem to be any D-I build. We should probably remove it from the list of what's monitored -mipsel: it's quite some time since we say The build daemon responsible for these builds is currently moving to a new hosting location. Daily builds should be available again within the first two weeks of 2011. Hasn't it been moved? -sparc: is there a chance that something happens? (the s390 issue mentioned in this report might be transient) Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:06 didaily@c3700 build_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_cdrom.log * OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:10 didaily@c3700 build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:14 didaily@c3700 build_miniiso http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_miniiso.log * daily mipsel images build: The build daemon responsible for these builds is currently moving to a new hosting location. Daily builds should be available again within the first two weeks of 2011. * FAILED BUILD: s390 Feb 23 00:02 buildd@zandonai build_generic http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390/daily/build_generic.log * FAILED BUILD: s390 Feb 23 00:02 buildd@zandonai build_tape http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/s390/daily/build_tape.log * daily sparc images build: Due to the lack of buildd suitable buildd machine there are currently no daily builds for the SPARC architecture. These builds will be reenabled as soon as as a suitable machine is available. Totals: 110 builds (2 failed, 11 old) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/e1ps35h-0005he...@ravel.debian.org -- signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Hi, At Fri, 11 Feb 2011 07:33:50 +0900, Yasuhiro Araki wrote: Kmuto, I find latest 149.20.20.135 in returning query as follows, ksw.araki.net: Sun Feb 06 01:46:53 +0900 2011 74.125.38.81:ok:deb.cdn.araki.net:USA:128.226.116.176 149.20.20.135 osdn2.debian.net: Sun Jan 23 06:26:40 +0900 2011 67.195.111.183:ok:deb.cdn.araki.net:USA:128.226.116.176 149.20.20.135 Could you find 149.20.20.135 in returning query at debian2.topstudio.co.jp? I didn't find 149.20.2.135 in recent 5 weeks logs. I restarted CDN-DNS server of my host for the present. -- Kenshi Muto km...@debian.org -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110214012407.e37301a7...@mail.topstudio.co.jp
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 07:29:38AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson 2squeezepowerpc http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2squeezepowerpc * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson Csqueezepowerpc http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/Csqueezepowerpc * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson 1squeezesparc http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/1squeezesparc * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson 2squeezesparc http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2squeezesparc * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson 2squeezemulti-arch-1 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2squeezemulti-arch-1 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson Csqueezemulti-arch-1 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/Csqueezemulti-arch-1 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson 1squeezekfreebsd-amd64 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/1squeezekfreebsd-amd64 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson 2squeezekfreebsd-amd64 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2squeezekfreebsd-amd64 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson 1squeezekfreebsd-i386 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/1squeezekfreebsd-i386 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson 2squeezekfreebsd-i386 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2squeezekfreebsd-i386 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 08 00:49 debian-cd@pettersson multi-arch http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/multi-arch These fail because of: mkdir -p /org/cdbuilder.debian.org/src/deb-cd/tmp/1squeezekfreebsd-i386/wheezy/tasks echo - copying task files from 'tasks/squeeze/' - copying task files from 'tasks/squeeze/' cp -r /srv/cdbuilder.debian.org/build/debian-cd/tasks/wheezy/* /org/cdbuilder.debian.org/src/deb-cd/tmp/1squeezekfreebsd-i386/wheezy/tasks cp: cannot stat `/srv/cdbuilder.debian.org/build/debian-cd/tasks/wheezy/*': No such file or directory make: *** [/org/cdbuilder.debian.org/src/deb-cd/tmp/1squeezekfreebsd-i386/wheezy/tasks] Error 1 The latter seems to be a debian-cd issue. Caused by me updating things in the middle of a daily build run. Later ones should have worked fine as I checked in wheezy versions of the tasks files (simply copied from squeeze for now). -- Steve McIntyre, Cambridge, UK.st...@einval.com You lock the door And throw away the key There's someone in my head but it's not me -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110211225353.ge3...@einval.com
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
We have a bunch of recent failed builds for D-I images ATM: Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): (sent daily to -boot) Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * FAILED BUILD: armel Feb 09 22:18 joey@box build_iop32x_network-console_ss4000e http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_ss4000e.log These do fail because of: Ign http://cdn.debian.net unstable/main/debian-installer armel Packages Err http://cdn.debian.net unstable/main/debian-installer armel Packages 403 Forbidden [IP: 149.20.20.135 80] Fetched 20 B in 1s (19 B/s) W: Failed to fetch http://cdn.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/debian-installer/binary-armel/Packages.gz 403 Forbidden [IP: 149.20.20.135 80] E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead. * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson 2squeezepowerpc http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2squeezepowerpc * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson Csqueezepowerpc http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/Csqueezepowerpc * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson 1squeezesparc http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/1squeezesparc * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson 2squeezesparc http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2squeezesparc * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson 2squeezemulti-arch-1 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2squeezemulti-arch-1 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson Csqueezemulti-arch-1 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/Csqueezemulti-arch-1 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson 1squeezekfreebsd-amd64 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/1squeezekfreebsd-amd64 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson 2squeezekfreebsd-amd64 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2squeezekfreebsd-amd64 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson 1squeezekfreebsd-i386 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/1squeezekfreebsd-i386 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 07 22:17 debian-cd@pettersson 2squeezekfreebsd-i386 http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/2squeezekfreebsd-i386 * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 08 00:49 debian-cd@pettersson multi-arch http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/multi-arch These fail because of: mkdir -p /org/cdbuilder.debian.org/src/deb-cd/tmp/1squeezekfreebsd-i386/wheezy/tasks echo - copying task files from 'tasks/squeeze/' - copying task files from 'tasks/squeeze/' cp -r /srv/cdbuilder.debian.org/build/debian-cd/tasks/wheezy/* /org/cdbuilder.debian.org/src/deb-cd/tmp/1squeezekfreebsd-i386/wheezy/tasks cp: cannot stat `/srv/cdbuilder.debian.org/build/debian-cd/tasks/wheezy/*': No such file or directory make: *** [/org/cdbuilder.debian.org/src/deb-cd/tmp/1squeezekfreebsd-i386/wheezy/tasks] Error 1 The latter seems to be a debian-cd issue. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Christian PERRIER wrote: * FAILED BUILD: armel Feb 09 22:18 joey@box build_iop32x_network-console_ss4000e http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_ss4000e.log These do fail because of: Ign http://cdn.debian.net unstable/main/debian-installer armel Packages Err http://cdn.debian.net unstable/main/debian-installer armel Packages 403 Forbidden [IP: 149.20.20.135 80] Fetched 20 B in 1s (19 B/s) W: Failed to fetch http://cdn.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/debian-installer/binary-armel/Packages.gz 403 Forbidden [IP: 149.20.20.135 80] E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead. mirrors1.kernel.org always returns 403 when accessed as cdn.debian.net. --2011-02-10 16:28:03-- http://cdn.debian.net/debian/dists/stable/main/binary-armel/Packages.gz Resolving cdn.debian.net... 149.20.20.135, 128.226.116.176 Connecting to cdn.debian.net|149.20.20.135|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 403 Forbidden 2011-02-10 16:28:05 ERROR 403: Forbidden. Note that mirrors2.kernel.org is does not have this problem. The CDN status page shows it knows of this problem and dig shows it has removed the host from the CDN. But there seems to be a DNS caching problem. joey@finch:~host cdn.debian.net 8.8.8.8 Using domain server: Name: 8.8.8.8 Address: 8.8.8.8#53 Aliases: cdn.debian.net is an alias for deb.cdn.araki.net. deb.cdn.araki.net has address 128.226.116.176 deb.cdn.araki.net has address 149.20.20.135 Are google's DNS servers ignoring the cdn.debian.net TTL? -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Joey, Thanks for reporting. Kmuto, I find latest 149.20.20.135 in returning query as follows, ksw.araki.net: Sun Feb 06 01:46:53 +0900 2011 74.125.38.81:ok:deb.cdn.araki.net:USA:128.226.116.176 149.20.20.135 osdn2.debian.net: Sun Jan 23 06:26:40 +0900 2011 67.195.111.183:ok:deb.cdn.araki.net:USA:128.226.116.176 149.20.20.135 Could you find 149.20.20.135 in returning query at debian2.topstudio.co.jp? On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 5:51 AM, Joey Hess jo...@debian.org wrote: Christian PERRIER wrote: * FAILED BUILD: armel Feb 09 22:18 joey@box build_iop32x_network-console_ss4000e http://people.debian.org/~joeyh/d-i/armel/images/daily/build_iop32x_network-console_ss4000e.log These do fail because of: Ign http://cdn.debian.net unstable/main/debian-installer armel Packages Err http://cdn.debian.net unstable/main/debian-installer armel Packages 403 Forbidden [IP: 149.20.20.135 80] Fetched 20 B in 1s (19 B/s) W: Failed to fetch http://cdn.debian.net/debian/dists/unstable/main/debian-installer/binary-armel/Packages.gz 403 Forbidden [IP: 149.20.20.135 80] E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used instead. mirrors1.kernel.org always returns 403 when accessed as cdn.debian.net. --2011-02-10 16:28:03-- http://cdn.debian.net/debian/dists/stable/main/binary-armel/Packages.gz Resolving cdn.debian.net... 149.20.20.135, 128.226.116.176 Connecting to cdn.debian.net|149.20.20.135|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 403 Forbidden 2011-02-10 16:28:05 ERROR 403: Forbidden. Note that mirrors2.kernel.org is does not have this problem. The CDN status page shows it knows of this problem and dig shows it has removed the host from the CDN. But there seems to be a DNS caching problem. joey@finch:~host cdn.debian.net 8.8.8.8 Using domain server: Name: 8.8.8.8 Address: 8.8.8.8#53 Aliases: cdn.debian.net is an alias for deb.cdn.araki.net. deb.cdn.araki.net has address 128.226.116.176 deb.cdn.araki.net has address 149.20.20.135 Are google's DNS servers ignoring the cdn.debian.net TTL? -- see shy jo -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iQIVAwUBTVRP1MkQ2SIlEuPHAQi1ARAApq7qqjbsIHNY/HFA5IyErXUZJzujGapq ff4HoblsgMKX6GD0nTy12mW9pMIBxYuhdZylSxubsGrPjmGgvLd3l3K0c6NS Lt5H3EDy1xu/lO295+UF9SDm3XWz9rTi5zGRKp9MhVKDfSPNx40iZU5M69R+vfpJ 0dI9XpzO7hPUsJT4kgC4eZtGNWe2hiiG4zPsOTrM3c/HAMtlE6oTOpDexw9FpHvL W3kTvaBz5dEwC4egjolO8DkRn93SYPKUgsKqlelkbLwPrXgj2kU2ptNZpYL+TXgj pfU8CjkIljobXRZSk7pSd5fNRgUobA1u/X1Gvr/W6T1SEWqqKUFbPUb/fwnV7hOz /IjPvxOVhXCU5kwpEPPpy+63sG6PvzjzCbDlBcVbquP8P/zOrra/OZKUVFhpYA6x XV2pqyA4+r5oSgtD9mZylZ6nZU1dVDFu9Pg3NXNFKCQ9hmHGI7DN/dmr1bp/RwMT AlzP8+nO7QYT+FTGBDhdMonjPMNFRTdAsYJE6vRn01PowvPin/p6WKU0QBo+U7DO jcvhBmA5YBZ/9XGpwQs0puJbsnPLgh8CXGyIAqXC56U9NPpred5eBapRY4LMQ2ri M9UyPF/NaR4L6Mz0BnCjyW93JV7h2bwi/q7Ov+toltEneTzhMt8MT+L8GdwF992t 2c+zYltKY5U= =IZ2U -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- ARAKI Yasuhiro -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/AANLkTimZ2aM76Q=ik3cjxbuhdmsho9fneh5-swoxn...@mail.gmail.com
Update on D-I builds is needed (was: Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds)
Quoting Daily build aggregator (debian-boot@lists.debian.org): Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * OLD BUILD:hppa Jan 17 07:06 didaily@c3700 build_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_cdrom.log I noticed that hppa is now only supported in unstable. Would it this that affects D-I builds? * OLD BUILD:kfreebsd-amd64 Feb 05 00:11 buildd@fano build_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/kfreebsd-amd64/daily/build_cdrom.log New as of today * OLD BUILD:mips Feb 01 00:16 buildd@ball build_malta_netboot-2.6 http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/mips/daily/build_malta_netboot-2.6.log No more mips build for 5 days... * FAILED BUILD: amd64 Feb 04 05:07 debian-cd@pettersson 1sidhppa http://cdbuilder.debian.org/cdimage-log/1sidhppa This is an error I never saw before... signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
On 2011-01-13, Daily build aggregator debian-boot@lists.debian.org wrote: * daily sparc images build: Due to the lack of porter and buildd admin interest there are currently no daily builds for the SPARC architecture. These builds will be reenable as soon as someone finds the time to do the necessary buildd setup. Please remove the buildd FUD. kthx Philipp Kern -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/slrniitjg0.ka2.tr...@kelgar.0x539.de
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Can whoever (Geert I guess) caused these mails to be sent please fix them so they appear to come from a role address, not whoever is running the script? Joey Hess wrote: Debian installer build overview -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: I'm a bit confused where this mail comes from. Today I activated the script that generates this sort of mail on d-i.d.o (aka ravel). There is also a cronjob for the d-i user that runs the script daily at 00:30. But on ravel the current time is 21:33, so the script should not have been run yet. I've been running the script every 15 minutes on ravel for ages. I can stop it and make the pages a redirect to the d-i.d.o if desired. -- see shy jo signature.asc Description: Digital signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Excerpts from Joey Hess's message of Die Nov 09 19:58:25 +0100 2010: Gaudenz Steinlin wrote: I'm a bit confused where this mail comes from. Today I activated the script that generates this sort of mail on d-i.d.o (aka ravel). There is also a cronjob for the d-i user that runs the script daily at 00:30. But on ravel the current time is 21:33, so the script should not have been run yet. I've been running the script every 15 minutes on ravel for ages. I can stop it and make the pages a redirect to the d-i.d.o if desired. Yes please do so, unless others strongly disagree. I think d-i.debian.org is now the canonical place for all this stuff. If I find some time I'd like to convert the script to something that gets triggered after a new build is uploaded so that the pages are always up to date. Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1289334127-sup-9...@meteor.durcheinandertal.local
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Excerpts from Joey Hess's message of Die Nov 09 19:55:48 +0100 2010: Can whoever (Geert I guess) caused these mails to be sent please fix them so they appear to come from a role address, not whoever is running the script? I commited the change that caused these mails. I'm a bit unsure to whicht address to change the From header. Do you think it's better to use something like Daily build aggregator debian-boot@lists.debian.org? AFAIK there is no d-i role mailalias appart from the mailinglist. And hardcoding something like d...@ravel.debian.org seems even worse than using the name of whoever is running the script. Note that the mails already contain an X-Daily-Build-Aggregator header for easier filtering. Gaudenz -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
I commited the change that caused these mails. I'm a bit unsure to whicht address to change the From header. Do you think it's better to use something like Daily build aggregator debian-boot@lists.debian.org? I guess so. This makes it more agnostic I think. -- Otavio Salvador O.S. Systems E-mail: ota...@ossystems.com.br http://www.ossystems.com.br Mobile: +55 53 9981-7854 http://projetos.ossystems.com.br -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-boot-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/aanlkti=dw6sfv9j_ldpqsdbqdlo9prnuvrmwbejw0...@mail.gmail.com
Re: Debian installer build: failed or old builds
Hi I'm a bit confused where this mail comes from. Today I activated the script that generates this sort of mail on d-i.d.o (aka ravel). There is also a cronjob for the d-i user that runs the script daily at 00:30. But on ravel the current time is 21:33, so the script should not have been run yet. But this mail seems to come from joeyh and is sent from merkel. Is there another instance of the daily build aggregator running on merkel? How did the script get updated there? Joey, do you know anything about this? Gaudenz Excerpts from Joey Hess's message of Mon Nov 08 21:45:13 +0100 2010: Debian installer build overview --- Failed or old builds: * OLD BUILD:hppa Jun 07 00:12 bui...@lafayette build_cdrom http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_cdrom.log * OLD BUILD:hppa Jun 07 00:16 bui...@lafayette build_netboot http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:hppa Jun 07 00:21 bui...@lafayette build_miniiso http://d-i.debian.org/daily-images/hppa/daily/build_miniiso.log * OLD BUILD:sparc Jul 12 11:04 stapp...@dd build_cdrom http://people.debian.org/~stappers/d-i/sparc/daily/build_cdrom.log * OLD BUILD:sparc Jul 12 11:08 stapp...@dd build_netboot http://people.debian.org/~stappers/d-i/sparc/daily/build_netboot.log * OLD BUILD:sparc Jul 12 11:11 stapp...@dd build_miniiso http://people.debian.org/~stappers/d-i/sparc/daily/build_miniiso.log Totals: 167 builds (0 failed, 6 old) -- Ever tried. Ever failed. No matter. Try again. Fail again. Fail better. ~ Samuel Beckett ~ signature.asc Description: PGP signature
