Re: Missing glyphs

2008-05-29 Thread Davide Viti
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:05:46AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Jamil,
> >
> > On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 12:49:13AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 09:39:57AM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
> >> >> > For bn [2], it seems "DOTTED CIRCLE (U+25CC)" glyph [4] is missing.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > > [1] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/
> >> >> > > [2] 
> >> >> > > http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/2.24-2_vs_2.25-1/common/bn.png
> >> >> > > [3] 
> >> >> > > http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/2.24-2_vs_2.25-1/common/zh_CN.png
> >> >> > >
> >> >> >
> >> >> > [4] http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/25cc/index.htm
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >> thanx, it has to be a  ttf-freefont bug then, will check that.
> >> >
> >> > the glyph is definitely not included in current ttf-freefont.
> >> > Is it a glyph normally found in Bengali text?
> >> >
> >>
> >> This glyph is used to indicate combining characters. So I guess all
> >> Indic language use it.
> >>
> >> Actually in your screenshot [2] that part shows wrong spelling. Check
> >> my attachment for details. :)
> >
> >
> > thanx for clarifying,
> > does that mean that the problem goes away fixing a typo?
> 
> No, that glyph will be still missing! :)

that's true; I was surprised not to find u+25cc among the codepoints
used in "bn", see "codepoints" column in :

http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/spellcheck/level1/index.html 

> 
> > Caould you please fix that?
> 
> Yes, I will try to fix the typo shortly.
> 

thank you,
Davide


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Missing glyphs

2008-05-28 Thread Jamil Ahmed
On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 1:12 PM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Jamil,
>
> On Tue, May 27, 2008 at 12:49:13AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
>> On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 12:21 AM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 09:39:57AM +0200, Davide Viti wrote:
>> >> > For bn [2], it seems "DOTTED CIRCLE (U+25CC)" glyph [4] is missing.
>> >> >
>> >> > > [1] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/
>> >> > > [2] 
>> >> > > http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/2.24-2_vs_2.25-1/common/bn.png
>> >> > > [3] 
>> >> > > http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/2.24-2_vs_2.25-1/common/zh_CN.png
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> > [4] http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/25cc/index.htm
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> thanx, it has to be a  ttf-freefont bug then, will check that.
>> >
>> > the glyph is definitely not included in current ttf-freefont.
>> > Is it a glyph normally found in Bengali text?
>> >
>>
>> This glyph is used to indicate combining characters. So I guess all
>> Indic language use it.
>>
>> Actually in your screenshot [2] that part shows wrong spelling. Check
>> my attachment for details. :)
>
>
> thanx for clarifying,
> does that mean that the problem goes away fixing a typo?

No, that glyph will be still missing! :)

> Caould you please fix that?

Yes, I will try to fix the typo shortly.

>
> thanx alot,
> Davide
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFIO7RNax2slmJA7HoRAoO1AJ9hXDmm+2cXTwa8bvaZIow43r+uXACg9lwj
> oXRjSEvrBeUFg95VE1Wm5a0=
> =P75K
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Missing glyphs

2008-05-22 Thread Davide Viti
Hi Jamil,

On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 02:16:13AM +0600, Jamil Ahmed wrote:
> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > While generating the screenshots [1] showing how new dejavu renders text,
> > I've noticed there are some missing glyphs, at least for bn [2] and zh_CN 
> > [3];
> > it'd be interesting to know if it's a font problem (missing glyph) or an 
> > error
> > in the po file.
> >
> > any hints from original translators??
> >
> 
> For bn [2], it seems "DOTTED CIRCLE (U+25CC)" glyph [4] is missing.
> 
> > regards,
> > Davide
> >
> > [1] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/
> > [2] 
> > http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/2.24-2_vs_2.25-1/common/bn.png
> > [3] 
> > http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/2.24-2_vs_2.25-1/common/zh_CN.png
> >
> 
> [4] http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/25cc/index.htm
> 

thanx, it has to be a  ttf-freefont bug then, will check that.

Davide



signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Re: Missing glyphs

2008-05-20 Thread Jamil Ahmed
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:47 PM, Davide Viti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While generating the screenshots [1] showing how new dejavu renders text,
> I've noticed there are some missing glyphs, at least for bn [2] and zh_CN [3];
> it'd be interesting to know if it's a font problem (missing glyph) or an error
> in the po file.
>
> any hints from original translators??
>

For bn [2], it seems "DOTTED CIRCLE (U+25CC)" glyph [4] is missing.

> regards,
> Davide
>
> [1] http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/
> [2] 
> http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/2.24-2_vs_2.25-1/common/bn.png
> [3] 
> http://d-i.alioth.debian.org/gtk-frontend/screenshots/2.24-2_vs_2.25-1/common/zh_CN.png
>

[4] http://www.fileformat.info/info/unicode/char/25cc/index.htm

> -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iD8DBQFIMrpQax2slmJA7HoRAtbiAJ4uHGrM2biJekAYjlOD1xJ5H352kgCgo0JT
> M3K8zEPBp4A6+5QTkIo/kTc=
> =mHw1
> -END PGP SIGNATURE-
>
>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Missing glyphs

2008-05-20 Thread Christian Perrier
Quoting Davide Viti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> While generating the screenshots [1] showing how new dejavu renders text,
> I've noticed there are some missing glyphs, at least for bn [2] and zh_CN [3];
> it'd be interesting to know if it's a font problem (missing glyph) or an error
> in the po file.
> 
> any hints from original translators??


You probably need to CC them:

Jamil Ahmed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ming Hua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>





signature.asc
Description: Digital signature