Re: Please ignore some warnings in jenkins
Hi Cyril, On Dienstag, 16. September 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote: (I read -boot@ :) ACK. I confess I tend to mail people explicitly for specific topics… I think that's great, though I got into the habbit of bcc:ing people by now... where did you push to? I got caught into testing d-i with some extra packages and I actually managed to send the mail pretending I pushed something I didn't, woops. Fixed now: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/debian-installer.git/diff/?id=ef8b110 :-) I was hoping you prepared changes to jenkins.d.n's git repo and added those warnings yourself, so that I'd merely need to pull them in... ;-) I will do so myself and then send the diff to this thread, so you get an idea how simple it is to add new warnings ;-) cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Please ignore some warnings in jenkins
Hi, On Mittwoch, 17. September 2014, Holger Levsen wrote: I was hoping you prepared changes to jenkins.d.n's git repo and added those warnings yourself, so that I'd merely need to pull them in... ;-) for future reference, this would be easier for everyone involved: git clone ssh://git.debian.org/git/qa/jenkins.debian.net.git vi jenkins.debian.net/logparse/debian-installer.rules $send_patches_or_pull_requests That said, if asked for, I'll happily edit those warnings for you. I just think it might be easier to DIY. cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Please ignore some warnings in jenkins
Hi Cyril, (I read -boot@ :) On Dienstag, 16. September 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote: could you please tweak the debian-installer jenkins job to ignore some warnings? https://jenkins.debian.net/view/d-i_packages/job/d-i_build_debian-installe r/ I've just pushed a patch to deal with the job server warnings, as proposed in: https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2013/06/msg00071.html where did you push to? The following remain: dpkg: warning: trying to overwrite '.*', which is also in package busybox-udeb .* dpkg-genchanges: warning: the current version (.*) is earlier than the previous one (.*) I don't think the first one points to a real issue. The second one could be worked on/fixed by setting a more appropriate version in changelog but since there's no upgrade path to consider, I don't think it's a good idea to keep the build in the “unstable” state just for that. ack I'm not sure what we should do with the last one: mkfs.fat: warning - lowercase labels might not work properly with DOS or Windows since I'm not sure about possible consequences. I'm putting debian-cd@ in the loop since they might have some insight to share. :-) so can I pull your changes from somewhere or what shall I do? cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: Please ignore some warnings in jenkins
Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org (2014-09-16): (I read -boot@ :) ACK. I confess I tend to mail people explicitly for specific topics… On Dienstag, 16. September 2014, Cyril Brulebois wrote: could you please tweak the debian-installer jenkins job to ignore some warnings? https://jenkins.debian.net/view/d-i_packages/job/d-i_build_debian-installe r/ I've just pushed a patch to deal with the job server warnings, as proposed in: https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2013/06/msg00071.html where did you push to? I got caught into testing d-i with some extra packages and I actually managed to send the mail pretending I pushed something I didn't, woops. Fixed now: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/debian-installer.git/diff/?id=ef8b110 The following remain: dpkg: warning: trying to overwrite '.*', which is also in package busybox-udeb .* dpkg-genchanges: warning: the current version (.*) is earlier than the previous one (.*) I don't think the first one points to a real issue. The second one could be worked on/fixed by setting a more appropriate version in changelog but since there's no upgrade path to consider, I don't think it's a good idea to keep the build in the “unstable” state just for that. ack I'm not sure what we should do with the last one: mkfs.fat: warning - lowercase labels might not work properly with DOS or Windows since I'm not sure about possible consequences. I'm putting debian-cd@ in the loop since they might have some insight to share. :-) so can I pull your changes from somewhere or what shall I do? Filtering out the two warnings before your 'ack' should be a nice first step. I'll probably annoy you some more once I've got some feedback about the lowercase label thing if we go for ignoring that kind of warnings too. Mraw, KiBi. signature.asc Description: Digital signature
